RAW + Jpeg Deleting Master Jpeg File

I have several 100 photos that were imported as RAW + Jpeg. I don't need or want the Jpeg master files. How do I delete them while leaving the RAW masters?
Dual 2 GHz G5, 2.5 GB RAM, Aperture 1.5.2   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  
Dual 2 GHz G5, 2.5 GB RAM, Final Cut Studio   Mac OS X (10.4.4)  

i asked the same thing quite a while ago ... see if
this helps you out ...
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5819
12&tstart=0
Thanks, but it didn't work.
Dual 2 GHz G5, 2.5 GB RAM, Final Cut Studio   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

Similar Messages

  • How to Delete imported JPEGS after matching RAW files are imported as masters

    Using a 5D Mark III and shoot JPEG (SD) and RAW (CF).
    Aperture 3.5.1, using a managed library
    Perviously, using a 7D so new to shooting JPEG and RAWs from an aperture Aperture workflow standpoint.
    I know that i can import the JPEGs > delete images that do not make the cut > then import the matching RAW files in the import dialogue that correspond to the JPEGs in the Aperture Library.
    I use the RAW files as my Camera Master images and once the RAW files are imported, the smaller resolution JPEGs are no longer needed or viewed in my normal edit workflow.  I only need the JPEGs to quickly go through the images to find out which RAW files i need to import at a later time to increase the speed of import > edit > deliver.
    My Assumptions:
    1.  Logic would lead me to believe that after import the user should see a stack like image representation with whatever file type is considered Master to be on top and the viewable secondary file type on the bottom.  clicking on the image stack should allow you to see both file types as you would normally see with image stacks with the same files types.  This is not the case...  What am i missing here?
    2.  Logic again would lead me to believe that when i have the ability to delete one of the 2 image types as i do not need both in the end.  After the import process is complete and RAWs are backed up, I want to delete the JPEG files as they are just taking up more space on my DAS drive array...  There is no need to keep a duplicate of every file in both JPEG and RAW format.  This is not the case as when i delete the JPEG or RAW, both files formats are deleted simultaneously.  What am i missing here?
    Problems: (correspond to Assumptions above)
    1.  I do not seem to have access to both images (JPEG & RAW) in a stack where i can expand and close the stack to see both?  It seems like i only have access to the image type i have selected as Master?  This seems counter intuitive to what the workflow should be as why would aperture 'lock the secondary file types away' so you can't easily view both file types as the same time for comparison?
    2a.  Reality seems to be that i do not have access to the JPEG and RAW image files.  I can only see one at a time by selecting the images and choosing 'make JPEG master’ and then respectively... 'make RAW master', but you can't see both at the same time for file comparison.
    2b.  Also, I can't find a way to delete the JPEG images after the RAW files have been imported.  I would presume most professional photographers shoot RAW and do not shoot JPEG as their camera master or editing master images.  I do not understand why aperture has captured both as a pair in the library that does not allow me to delete the JPEG (in this case) as i have selected the RAW as my master.
    If someone can please help...  The function seems like either i am missing something obvious or that the implemented function of using RAW + JPEGs files for import is broken from a real world workflow standpoint.

    leonie...
    thank you for clearing that up for me.
    I think that at this point it is silly to use the JPEG+RAW import functionality as it seems that it takes longer to do the above steps than to just import only the RAW files and press on from there.
    I seems what i have done in the past of only importing the RAW files and then using the quick preview functionality to reduce image load times is the best thing in can come up with without keeping 'duplicates' in the database.
    That really baffels me that there is no built in functionality to remove the JPEG from a RAW+JPEG pair and i wonder how the real world photographers who help Apple test and implement software to solve real world workflow problems thought the JPEG+RAW import was going to be used.
    I do understand that i can use a smaller JPEG file size to reduce the bloat of the database, but used over hundreds of thousands of images is certainly going to make a dent in my total aperture database size and therefore storage needs down the road.
    If you have any other workflow thoughts, or know of a 3rd party plugin/ etc... to fix this obvious shortcoming then i am all ears..
    thank you again Leonie and have a great week

  • Delete RAW and set JPEG to Master

    For a large number of photos, I imported both the RAW and JPEG versions from my cameras.  However, I no longer really need the RAW versions for many of them; I would like to delete them and reclaim the disk space they consume.
    Can anyone tell me step-by-step how to (1) delete the RAW versions of selected images, and (2) set the remaining JPEG as Master?
    I'm using Aperture 3.4.1
    dt

    It will be a lot of work, if you really want to do it, and it is a risky operation, I really cannot recommend to do it  ...
    Back up your library, before you read on.
    First of all, to make the jpegs the original master image files instead of the raw images select the images in the Browser and use the command "Photos > Use Jpeg as Original".
    Then turn your images into referenced images and move the originals to a folder outside your Aperture Library by using the command "File > Relocate Originals" and selecting to move the files, not to copy them. Pick a folder where you want tthe images to stay permanently; you should not try to move them back after deleting the raws - that will result in error messages.
    Then select an image in the Browser and use the command: "File > Show in Finder". In the Folder that opens, you can delete the raw files for each image.
    Test, if you can still work with the image and edit it, after removing the raw. If there should be any problems, put the raw back and forget about it.
    But if all is fine, remove more raws, as you see fit.
    I'd keep the raws for the images that are most important to you, however.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • How to delete JPEGs after RAW + JPEG import of referenced files?

    Anyone know? I gather that simply deleting the JPEGs in the finder will mess up the Aperture library.

    http://blogs.oreilly.com/aperture/2007/09/getting-rid-of-unwanted-manage-1.html
    http://www.bagelturf.com/files/f2152c171c89f2ce02166f0f69bdac17-993.php
    i used the bagelturf method on a copy of my library first to see how it would work ... and it did just fine ... no issues ...

  • Batch delete the JPEG's from all my RAW/JPEG pairs?

    What's the best way to batch delete the JPEG's from all my  RAW+JPEG pairs?
    I have a 88k image library many of which are RAW+JPEG pairs.  I've got about 50GB's left on my 2TB internal hard drive and need to free up space.  I'm combing through the years worth of data attempting to clean it all up but I thought dumping the JPEG's would be a quick and easy gain.  Can anyone thing of a safe way to do this?  Creating an album of all my pairs is easy enough but I can't find a "delete JPEG" option.
    Thanks!
    -Jared
    www.rogersglobal.com

    Again, another untested idea for you. You should try it with one image first and Please! make sure your library is backed up first.
    Select the Photos group from the Library pane to show all photos in the browser.
    Set your view to Browser only.
    Clear any filters in the top right if they are set.
    Click the Filter icon at the top right.
    If it's not already there, add the rule for "File Type" using the popup menu.
    Set the filter to show Filetype Is RAW+JPEG.
    You are now looking at all of your RAW+JPEG pairs in your entire library.
    Make sure all the images are set to RAW as Master.
    Select all the photos (test just one first!) and File->Relocate Masters. Choose an external disk with enough room.
    Once all the masters are moved out of the library to a new location (this could take awhile if you have many photos), Navigate to the new location of the masters and remove the JPEGs. Sort by filetype in the Finder to make it easier.
    Back in Aperture, Select all the RAW+JPEG pairs in the filtered browser and choose File->Consolidate Masters. (Now that the JPEGs are gone, I don't know if Aperture will complain. That's why you should test this first on 1 image)
    If this worked, you should now have only RAW masters in your library.
    I repeat myself: I didn't test this. Please test on a fully backed up library on only 1 image first. Good luck.

  • How do I find BOTH the raw and the cameras jpeg files?

    I've got Aperture 3 importing raw plus jpegs from my Nikon D600 camera. The D600 produces amazing jpegs!
    Aperture is set to use the raw file as the master.
    I'd hoped that I'd have access to both the raw AND the camera jpeg but I only see the raw file and as soon as I open it, the cameras jpeg is replaced by something that aperture generates. It's quite frustrating because the jpegs from my Nikon look fantastic but only for a couple of seconds before aperture replaces them with a horrible, jpeg.
    I want to have access to both the camera's jpeg and the raw file. Aperture's jpegs just aren't that good compared to the Nikon original jpegs. Not even close!
    Is there any way that I can get back my Nikon camera's jpegs or are they gone, forever?
    Thanks in advance!

    Roy Martin German wrote:
    For some unknown reason, although I can see both the "Use JPEG as Original" and the "Use RAW as Original", both of these menu items are grayed out?
    A couple of ways this can happen is (1) if only one format is actually on the  camera's card (i.e., the camera's Quality setting is incorrect), or (2) if "Import RAW files only" or "Import JPEG files only" was selected in the RAW+JPEG Pairs panel in the import dialog. So (1) are you sure the card contains RAW and JPEG images (e.g., have you looked at it with Finder), and (2) what setting was used during import?
    Roy Martin German wrote:
    but I only see the raw file and as soon as I open it, the cameras jpeg is replaced by something that aperture generates.
    Not sure what you mean by this statement. By design Aperture doesn't "replace" anything. Can you clarify?

  • How do I delete the jpeg from raw+jpeg imported images?

    Hi,
    Back in the day, I shot lots of images using raw+jpeg and imported them into Lightroom.  Now I realize those jpegs add no value and I'd like to recover the disk space that they're collectively occupying.
    Is there a good way to:
    1. Identify all images in a catalog which have raw+jpeg?
    2. Remove just the jpeg for these images?
    Thanks!

    $$PhotoHobby wrote:
    I'm very hesistant to take the chance on any 3rd party script.
    Just so ya know, what the deletion feature in RawPlusJpeg does is ultra simple:
    1. Identifies extraneous jpeg files.
    2. Presents them for you to review.
    3. Deletes the extraneous jpeg files, if you approve. (puts them in the recycle bin if possible).
    It does nothing to the database nor anything else.
    You sync folders with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' afterward, which is what sets the database right.
    The only potential for trouble is the criteria for determining which jpegs are extraneous.
    It has no direct access to the database, so what it does is check for jpegs with same base name as raw (which *must* be present in catalog, and on disk), that aren't in the catalog, which includes the jpegs associated with RAW+JPEG (imported as a unit), *and* any jpegs that were imported separately, but subsequently removed from the catalog, or had never been imported.
    So, what it does will be the perfect thing to do, *if* you first synchronize folders (with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' checked) to pull any jpegs in to the catalog that were previously imported separately, but may have been inadvertently removed from the catalog (or had never been imported), before invoking the delete feature of the plugin.
    Note: You must do that for any manual procedure too, or you will have the same problem, except in the manual case, you won't have the benefit of the plugin checking your work, and presenting the files to be deleted, before you commit.
    It's your call, obviously, and to save Geoff the Kiwi from pointing this out: the plugin comes with no guarantee, warranty, or any other kind of tea.
    Consider backing up catalog and photo files before doing this maintenance, whether manual, or plugin-assisted.
    In my opinion, the plugin-assisted method is much safer than the manual method, which is the only reason it was written, *not* to save steps, although it does that too. For example, you can not, with the plugin, delete any jpegs that do not have a corresponding RAW in the catalog and on disk, period. - unless there is a bug of course, but there probably isn't , at least not one that would change the aforementioned assertion... - it wouldn't take much of a bug to cause it to barf, but it would take a big bug to cause it to delete files that weren't on the list, etc...
    Seriously, I don't think you have to wait for Adobe on this one. I wouldn't (I didn't - my catalog is all clean now!...).
    PS - there is *very* little recorded in the database about the jpeg sidecar - it's existence upon import (when "as a unit") - that's about it. Most of the funny business about updating that we were fumbling with above, stems from the software (and the person at the keyboard), *not* the database. Syncing folders with 'Treat JPEG files next to raw files separately' checked, once the jpeg sidecars have been cleaned up, *will* set the database straight!
    Cheers,
    Rob.

  • RAW + JPEG capture - how to delete the JPEGs?

    I have accidentally captured a large number of images as both RAW + JPEG.
    Now I want to get rid of the JPEGs, but since LR displays both files as a single entity, I'm scratching my head how to go about it. I tried removing some JPEGs outside of LR then synchronized the folder, but LR now complains about missing "Sidecar" files. I can click the ? icon to fix this one-by-one, but is there a "proper way" to do it for all images in one fell swoop?
    Any hints welcome!

    Thanks everyone,
    I used to think this preference setting would only apply to future imports, but it's good to know that it works on synchronizing folders, too.
    Unfortunately I'm still left with question marks on all affected images (missing sidecar file), that apparently have to be dismissed one by one.
    I noticed one difference though…
    If I enable "Treat JPEG files next to raw files as separate Photos" and simply synchronize the folder to show the JPEGs, the question marks just disapear on click. However LR still references the JPEG and on synchronizing again will label all images again with question marks.
    On the other hand if I delete the JPEGs manually in the Finder before synchronizing, clicking the question marks brings up a dialog box asking whether I want to continue tracking the sidecar file or forget it – that seems to get rid of the references for good.
    I was hoping to avoid going through the images one by one, but there doesn't seem to be any other way.

  • Importing Raw Jpeg Pairs with Jpeg as Master

    I give....I imported raw and jpeg as pairs since aperture updated for the D7000. I see the J on the badge. I assume they are stacked. I see where i can change the master to the raw file by right clicking. However, can't i just navigate to the raw file for adjustments or do I have to switch the master? I have looked at the manual. I have a book on aperture, I searched the board. I gotta be missing something really basic! Please help this stupid newbie. Is it better to import both as masters in the future? What do people prefer? tx
    Message was edited by: Sheryl Kingstone

    Hi Sheryl,
    No, you aren't missing anything really basic. The RAW and JPG aren't really stacked. They are associated together in a different way that is only applicable for pulling JPG and RAW versions of the same photo out of your camera together.
    If you can answer the following question, it might help the other users (and mybe you) help you.
    Why is it a problem to have your RAW be the master?
    With your hesitation to switch the master to the RAW, you imply to me that you would like Aperture to work with your JPG files, but at the same time it your question implies that you would like you want to work on your RAW file.
    In my own preference, I struggled with what to start out with, RAW or JPG. I came to the conclusion that I didn't want to spend the time comparing RAW and JPG from my camera and deciding what to do. I no longer capture RAW+JPG in my camera.
    Basically, post-processing the RAW file through Aperture gives you lots more information to work with, as the creation of a JPG in your camera throws out lots of colors and pixels. So, I had to balance things, why would I choose to take a "throwaway snapshot" with RAW if I knew it probably wouldn't be worth post-processing? For instance, all the pictures of my niece at the dinnertable in really bad light. I can't do anything worthwhile in post-processing with the sharp shadows, and the 5 different and ugly light sources, and the fact that she only looked at the camera once. Yeah, I can make it a little better, but not enough that it's worth post-processing to me. So, for those pictures, I just let my camera do the work and use the most basic, point-and-shoot settings most of the time. My camera produces JPG-only in the basic settings.
    On the other hand, for those sunsets, gardens, forests, streams, vistas, etc, I probably would like to do a little post-processing if my exposure wasn't right to begin with. I decided that I would just let Aperture decode the RAW file for me and forget about the JPGs entirely. When I'm using my camera in manual mode (or one of the quasi-manual modes) I shoot in RAW only. Yes, my camera will do a better job rendering a JPG than Aperture will, but Aperture's very good and I figure I wouldn't be looking at the JPG from the camera if I'm doing other post-processing in Aperture.
    That being said, there are many other opinions and othe reasons to choose one way or the other.
    Hope that eas clear enough. I had lots of ideas to write about.
    hope this helps,
    nathan

  • Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files ignored when unchecked

    In the Catalog Settings under the Metadata tab, I have unchecked the option 'Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF and PSD files'.
    I then selected a JPEG photograph in the Library module and chose Metadata/Save Metatdata to File.  I wanted to save the metadata that I had added (keywords, IPTC, rating, etc), but not the develop settings.
    I then imported the jpeg back into another catalog.  The metadata I had added was there as expected, but so are the develop settings.  This I did not expect or want.
    Have I got something wrong here?  My understanding is that turning off the 'Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF and PSD files' option means that develop settings are not written to the xmp area in non raw files such as jpegs.
    Looks like a bug to me.
    Tony

    Hello all,
    I have investigated this problem further and now have the answer.  It is not that the option "Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files" is ignored, but it appears that the LR catalog is not properly updated when this option is turned off.
    Here are steps to test and illustrate the problem:
    1. Create a new folder and place a copy of an original jpeg image (original from camera) in the new folder.  Make sure you keep the original safe and only work on copies.
    2. Create a new catalog in Lightroom 2.3.
    3. Import the jpeg image from the new folder.
    4. Add some metadata (keywords, ratings, title, caption, IPTC data, etc).
    5. Make some Develop adjustments to the image.
    6. Open "Catalogue Settings" from the Edit menu and check (enable) the option "Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files".  Uncheck (disable)  the "Automatically write changes into XMP" option.
    7. Select "Save Metadata to File".
    8. Delete the jpeg image from the Library module, then re-import it.
    9. Copy the original image back to the new folder, replacing the updated jpeg (once again, the jpeg image now contains no metadata from Lightroom).  At this stage, Lightroom fails to recognize that the metadata in the LR catalog doesn’t match the metadata content in the jpeg file.  I would have though that it should.
    10. Open "Catalogue Settings" from the Edit menu and uncheck (turn off) the option "Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files".
    11. Reset the Develop settings.
    12. You now need to make a change to the metadata like increase or decrease the rating (otherwise LR won’t save any metadata to the jpeg file - LR is being too smart and thinks it’s already up to date, so does nothing when you do the next step).
    12. Select "Save Metadata to File".
    13. Delete the jpeg image from the Library module again, then re-import it again.
    14. Look at the develop settings (that you specifically did not want saved within the jpeg file in step 10).
    Although the Develop settings were Reset in step 11, you have ended up with the original Develop settings from step 5.  It is true that LR has not saved the reset develop settings, but it also hasn’t removed the old develop settings that are still stored in the catalog.  This must be considered a bug (oversight).  Note that it has also saved an Import snapshot as well.
    For the more technically minded (and the LR developers if you are listening), the field "xmp" in the table "Adobe_AdditionalMetadata" is not updated (old camera raw settings and snapshot settings are left behind) when the "Include Develop settings in metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files" option is unchecked (disabled) and it seems that this is the data that is written to the jpeg file when you select "Save Metadata to File".  Note that the state of "Automatically write changes into XMP" has not effect on this process - I tried it on and off.
    Hope that this might be of some help to others one day.
    Tony

  • I just upgraded to iPhoto '11.  When it was finished many pictures do not appear.  I have a black box but the information for the picture is still there.  Some are raw and some are jpeg.  Also lost all albums.  Can anyone offer assistance?

    I just upgraded to iPhoto '11.  When it was finished many pictures do not appear.  I have a black box but the information for the picture is still there.  Some are raw and some are jpeg.  Also lost all albums.  Can anyone offer assistance?  Using iOS 10.7.5

    Apply the two fixes below in order as needed:
    Fix #1
    1 - launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down and rebuild the library.
    2 - run Option #4 to rebuild the database.
    Fix #2
    Using iPhoto Library Manager  to Rebuild Your iPhoto Library
    1 - download iPhoto Library Manager and launch.
    2 - click on the Add Library button and select the library you want to add in the selection window..
    3 - Now that the library is listed in the left hand pane of iPLM, click on your library and go to the Library ➙ Rebuild Library menu option.
    4 - In the next  window name the new library and select the location you want it to be placed.
    5 - Click on the Create button.
    Note: This creates a new library based on the LIbraryData.xml file in the library and will recover Events, Albums, keywords, titles and comments.  However, books, calendars, cards and slideshows will be lost. The original library will be left untouched for further attempts at fixing the problem or in case the rebuilt library is not satisfactory.
    OT

  • RAW images appearing as JPEG in Lightroom

    Hi there,
    I have recently installed the latest version of Lightroom on my Apple iMac, when I import RAW files (NEF) from my hard drive (they are in iphoto) into LR they show up in LR as jpegs rather then NEF files. Is there something I am not doing correctly? I did not encounter this problem when I used to use LR with  RAW files with Windows Vista on my laptop, they appeared in Lightroom as NEF files not jpegs.
    Thanks for your help

    This is the Camera Raw Forum...the Lightroom Forum is down the hall. You would be better off asking there.

  • What does "Include develop settings metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files" do?

    I am wondering what the option "Include develop settings metadata inside JPEG, TIFF, and PSD files" found in catalog settings/metadata does?  what happens if you uncheck it?

    Bob12312321 wrote:
    also when this is unchecked will lightroom still save keyword changes to raw(nef) files?  thank you!
    Metadata ("real" metadata like keyowords nor develop adjustments) are never saved into non-DNG Raw files (like .nef, .cr2) directly. With these files, there is always a so called sidecar file (with the extension .xmp) created to hold the XMP information.
    And yes, if the option is unchecked, LR will save the keywords to the XMP sidecars, when you perform "Write Metadata to File" or have the autowrite option active.
    Beat

  • I was automating batch images but now when I do it is trying to save each raw photo as a jpeg

    I was automating batch images but now when I do it is trying to save each raw photo as a jpeg, how do I make it stop or is it a bug?
    The destination is marked "none". I've been doing this correctly all day so I don't know why it has started doing this! Help please

    Due to the current unavailability of clairvoyants and mind-readers in the forum, we respectfully request you supply sensible, complete details.
    BOILERPLATE TEXT:
    Note that this is boilerplate text.
    If you give complete and detailed information about your setup and the issue at hand,
    such as your platform (Mac or Win),
    exact versions of your OS, of Photoshop (not just "CS6", but something like CS6v.13.0.6) and of Bridge,
    your settings in Photoshop > Preference > Performance
    the type of file you were working on,
    machine specs, such as total installed RAM, scratch file HDs, total available HD space, video card specs, including total VRAM installed,
    what troubleshooting steps you have taken so far,
    what error message(s) you receive,
    if having issues opening raw files also the exact camera make and model that generated them,
    if you're having printing issues, indicate the exact make and model of your printer, paper size, image dimensions in pixels (so many pixels wide by so many pixels high). if going through a RIP, specify that too.
    A screen shot of your settings or of the image could be very helpful too,
    etc.,
    someone may be able to help you (not necessarily this poster, who is not a Windows user).
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    Thanks!

  • Lens correction works with my RAWs, but not my JPEGs?

    Hi all, if I check "Enable Profile Corrections" for any of my RAW files, Lightroom automatically identifies the Make/Model/Profile of my lens. However for my JPEG files (same camera, same lens) when I check "Enable Profile Corrections" it defaults to none/none/none, and my lens doesn't even show up in the dropdown menus if I try to select it manually.
    How can I get Lens Correction to work for JPEGs as it does for RAWs?

    Update, got it working, sweet! I'll post what I did below, hopefully useful to somebody...
    1) Probably the best thing would be to make my own Lens Profile -- http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/lensprofile_creator.html -- but I'm not quite ready for that now, I just wanted to make the built-in RAW profiles work for JPEG too.
    2) I located the RAW profiles I wanted available as JPEG profiles, in this folder:
    C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\[MyCamera]\
    3) In this folder:
    C:\Users\[USER]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\
    4) I created the following subfolder:
    C:\Users\[USER]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\[MyCamera]\
    5) I copied the RAW profile files from #2 above into this new folder.
    6) I set the files to not be "read-only"
    7) I opened those files into a text editor, and I performed a Find/Replace.
    From: <stCamera:CameraRawProfile>True
    To: <stCamera:CameraRawProfile>False
    (Note that there are multiple instances, so I performed a Find/Replace ALL.)
    8) I set the files back to "read-only" (probably not necessary)
    And now when I turn on Lens Correction for a JPEG, it works! And it seems like my camera isn't performing any lens corrections (such as vignetting) when saving JPEGs, so it's pertty good as-is. Though, per #1 above, probably the best solution would be to make my own Lens Profiles from scratch.
    Thanks to all & I hope this helps somebody...

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I back up my iphoto library on one external harddrive to another?

    I have successfully created one external hard drive back up from iphoto library. I am trying to back up this first hard drive with an additional hard drive, so my iphoto library is saved in two external hard drive locations. As of right now every tim

  • When we go for Business content extraction and when we go for LO/COPA etc.e

    Hi Dear Friends When we go for Business content extraction and when we go for LO/COPA etc.extractions Thanks Learner

  • Any BAdi for Digital Signature?

    ECC 6.0 Does anyone know of a BAdI, Enhancement Spot or exit for digital signature where I can detect the object that is being signed (in this situation Engg Change Management) and perform some follow on process (specifically call a Workflow API to c

  • Camera Raw v 8.2

    I'm using CS6 and just got an EOS 70D, cant open the RAW files. Adobe suggests updating using the Help menu but I keep getting "server unavailable or check firewall settings message". I downloaded the DNG converter v 8.2 but don't want to convert to

  • More Information on "Database Extractor"

    Dear Gurus, Could you please provide some useful links for PPTs, wikis for information in DATABASE  EXTRACTOR ? We do configure database extractor while doing managed system configuration (under Automatic Set-up) to extract data from satellite system