RAW processing

I'm new to this, so please be patient.
I want to edit photos in RAW format.  I use a Leica D-Lux 4 camera and always save in RAW (these upload as .rwl files).  How do I get these into PS Elements to work on them?  I'm a MAC user.
When in PS Elements  and I open Bridge all files appear: JPEG files appear as thumbnails, but the RAW files appear as just file covers.  I can open the JPEG files no problem, and these appear on the PS Elements worktop; however, if I try to open a RAW file it just opens in PREVIEW and I can't get it onto the PS Elements worktop to work with it.
Advice please.

You will need to update the versions of the raw converter you have. Bridge will update itself. Just go to Help>Updates. Although the adobe updater may claim it's updating PSE, it doesn't. You need to go here:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=40&platform=Macintosh
and download the latest version and install it manually, following the instructions exactly. Be sure to remove the old plug-in first.

Similar Messages

  • My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images

    Any ideas?

    My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images from Lightroom and choosing the "Render using Lightroom option when it popped up in the dialogue box. She has been doing this for over a year and a half without any problem. Today when she hit Command E no dialogue box appeared and the image just opened in Photoshop. I'm concerned that all of her Lightroom edits are not being rendered to Photoshop. Anyone have an idea as to how we can get the "Render using Lightroom" dialogue back?

  • How do I update a folder of DNGs to the new 2010 (Current) Raw Process?

    Is there an efficient method to update an entire folder of DNG images to the newer RAW process in Camera Raw 6.1 - to "2010 (Current)"?
    And as an added bonus, it would also be great to simultaneously update the Camera Profile - to "Adobe Standard".
    I have lots of folders of DNGs that were processed in ACR 5.7 or Lightroom 2.7, and so they were processed in the older, 2003, process version.
    I see that when I update a single DNG in Lightroom 3's Develop Module that I am asked if I want to update all of the photos shown in the Filmstrip at the bottom of the window.  This is very convenient!
    My father does not yet have Lightroom 3, but does have Photoshop CS5 and ACR 6.1 installed and he wants an efficient method to do the same using those tools. We found that if we open the folder in Bridge, select all the DNG images, open the multiple images in Camera Raw, click on the "Select All" button in the upper left corner of the window, that we can then go to the Camera Calibration panel and make these two changes to all of the images simultaneously.
    It seems like there should be some method of doing this from within Bridge. When we go to Edit -> Develop Settings -> Copy Camera Raw Settings and then select all of the other DNGs in the folder and go to Edit -> Develop Settings -> Paste Camera Raw Settings.... and choose only the Camera Calibration checkbox, that only one of the two settings actually gets changed; the Camera Profile setting does - the Process version does not.

    austinmirage wrote:
    Is there an efficient method to update an entire folder of DNG images to the newer RAW process in Camera Raw 6.1 - to "2010 (Current)"?
    And as an added bonus, it would also be great to simultaneously update the Camera Profile - to "Adobe Standard".
    You CAN easily make a Camera Raw preset or use Copy/Paste develop settings to change a folder's worth of files to "Adobe Standard"...that's simple. However, currently the Process version is not captured in a preset not copy/paste settings...the only current method is to actually open images inside of Camera Raw, select all and change the Process version to what you want...note, even Sync won't sync the Process version...only select all and then change the setting.
    It's hoped in the future this will be somehow addressed...it will require that the subsetting for Process version be a separate item in the Camera Calibration settings.

  • Why my raw looks different in lightroom and camera's raw processing software

    Hi, I am using a Sony A-100 and just start using Lightroom to process my raw file. I quite like lightroom's interface and its workflow, however, a a problem disturbing me is the image look quite different in sony's raw processing software and in lightroom (just import without any editing). In sony's software, the WB and exposure is correct and I don't need to adjust so much. But in lightroom, the color always looks warm and image is underexposure.
    Is it a common problem or it is just a special case as to sony's dslr camera.

    The main reason is that each different software is interpreting image and color data in its own way due, I guess, to different processing methods.
    In that way, digital is not different than film : no film render colors and contrast the same way.
    You have to choose what fits the best for you.
    As an example, I think ACR / LR handle Canon files pretty well ( quite close to Canon's propietary raw converter - neutral settings - ). On the other hand, Nikon owners have more troubles and seem to prefer Capture 4 or NX renderings.
    Gilles.

  • This photo was adjusted using an earlier version of Apple's RAW processing

    It is May 16 2012. A couple of days ago there was an update to OSX. I am now at 10.7.4. My Aperture version is 3.2.3. Digital Camera Raw 3.12.0 build 615 and a bunch of zeros.
    Last night when I imported a slew of photos, everything seemed to go well, but when all processing was complete all of the photos changed to a deep green hue. I finally found the message in the title line: "This photo was adjusted using an earlier version of Apple's RAW processing" and somewhat resolved the problem by individually reprocessing each master.
    Does anyone know what has caused Aperture to act this way and how the problem can be fixed? From a timing perspective, I feel that it was the OSX update, but I cannot be sure.
    Thanks in advance for any assistance.

    I am on a MacBook Air (mid 2011) running Lion 10.7.4 and Aperture 3.2.3 with Digital Camera Raw 3.12.0.  I have the exact same green photo import problem described above.  I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 and I shoot RAW.  Sometimes (I can't seem to determine what triggers this), when I click on the photo and Aperture brings it up in the Split View, Aperture briefly re-processes the photo and displays it without the green tint, but now the photo is over exposed.  If I right click->remove all adjustments, then the photo finally displays correctly.
    Sometimes, Aperture tells me "This photo was adjusted using an earlier version of Apple's RAW processing".
    The fix suggested by Snoop Dogg at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3942768?start=30&tstart=0 took away the green tint.  But now the recently imported photo is still over exposed.  By default, I turn on "Auto Enhance" on on my imports into Aperture.  I still have to right click->remove all adjustments, then the reapply the "Auto Enhance" quick fix before my photo finally displays correctly.
    Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.  Thanks.

  • ACR vs Aperture for Raw Processing

    I have been using Lightroom for over a year (including beta versions on my old PC), but have grown tired of it's lack of worthwhile output options. I have a trial version of Aperture and think that it is a far superior product on the management and output side of things, but I am having problems getting my raw files to look good to me.
    I could process all the files in Bridge first, then create tiffs or PSDs to import into Aperture, but that would negate have the purpose of Aperture. I need help with an Aperture workflow and probably with raw processing controls in Aperture.
    Specs: 17" MBP with 10.5.1, Aperture 1.5.6
    Camera: Pentax K10D ver 1.3
    I typically convert my PEF files to DNG due to better compression in DNG, but have tried using the original PEF with identical results. Any help is appreciated.

    I too came back to Aperture after a year of Lightroom's "workflow". It really is possible to match or surpass LR's output. There's a good guide to the adjustment tools here:
    http://www.insideaperture.com/Site/AdjustmentToolGuide.html
    Also lots of tips about workflow, etc. here:
    http://www.bagelturf.com/
    You probably won't want to spend too much money if you're just using the trial, but Ben Long's book
    Aperture Pro training Series: Aperture 1.5 is very good.

  • Leica D-LUX 4 (LX3) RAW Processing

    Hi all,
    Just wanted to report some interesting behavior regarding the long-awaited RAW processing ability for the D-LUX 4 and Panasonic LX3. I did not see this happen on the first library I coverted, because I let Aperture do the image processing, so the files were already converted when the Library upgrade process finihed.
    Anyway, this time I did not process images when doing the upgrade of my personal library, because I wanted it to finish the task quickly. It did about 3 hours for some 40K photos.
    I had been shooting RAW + jpg since I got my Leica D-LUX 4 in the hopes that Aperture would support it some day...and that day came!
    Anyway, the .RWL RAW files show up in the browser view as black boxes with the warning triangle. They convert when you select them individually, and that was pretty much as expected.
    What was cool though, was when I had opened an .RWL image into Split View, and then arrow key selected the next unprocessed image. Aperture displayed "Unsupported Picture Format" on top of a low res image that had really severe lens distortion for an instant in what appeared to be a 16:9 or longer aspect ratio image, then displayed the properly converted 4:3 RAW file.
    This is obviously the lens correction processing that is part of the way the camera operates, and that A2 was incapable of converting correctly. I thought it worth mentioning that you can sort of see it at work in A3.
    It is so great to have A3 do such a good job on these files, and be so responsive. Really enjoying getting to work with my Leica RAW files finally.
    THANKS APERTURE TEAM!
    Sincerely,
    K.J. Doyle

    Tonys264 wrote:
    I have been waiting for over a year for RAW support for the Leica D-Lux 4 using Aperture 2. It seems that this support is only going to be offered for Aperture 3 users. I have asked at my local Apple Store for an explanation without any success. Is it really just a marketing ploy for A3, or was there a technical reason why A2 could not have support for this camera??
    Hi Tony,
    Now I am not sure if this conversion works on a machine without Aperture 3 on it, because all of the machines here have A3 on them...
    BUT...
    I just dragged a .RWL file into iPhoto and it opened, no problem.
    I have no control over the conversion, of course, and the better control system for RAW is what you are paying for in A3.
    I shot over 30K images with my DL4, storing RAW + JPG hoping for this, and seeing them come up in A3, and be so workable (better that Phase one) was a very happy day for me.
    Sincerely,
    K.J. Doyle

  • RAW Processing Change?

    Today, I believe after installing the version 5.01 Digital RAW Compatibility Update, all of the pictures in my library produced by my Nikon D2x and D3 cameras are listed as being adjusted using an "earlier version of Apple's RAW processing." And clicking on the button to reprocess the RAW images does result in very minor changes.
    These cameras are pretty old models. Did Apple really sneak in some changes to RAW processing engine for older models along with the added models listed in the RAW Compatibility update? Nothing was said about this in the update page, and this happened before only with a major Aperture version introduction. Did this happen for anyone else?

    I'm seeing changes for many, perhaps all, my Sony camera bodies.  But first, note that the Images aren't -- iirc -- marked as "needing" to be re-converted -- they are simply marked as having been converted by a superannuated version of Digital Camera RAW.  I create my own RAW tuning settings, and save them as the default.  With DCRAW 5.x, I had to create new ones and save them again as the default.  But I didn't have to change any Images that had been converted with any of the older DCRAW versions.
    I think the notice I got was very similar to the one that shows up when you use the old "Highlights & Shadows (sic)" adjustment brick.

  • This photo was adjusted sung an earlier version of apple's RAW processing

    Using Aperture 3 I recieved this message when opening a new set of photos.  The reprocessing button does not work and all adjustments are not functioning.  What do I need to do be able to process these photos?

    I am on a MacBook Air (mid 2011) running Lion 10.7.4 and Aperture 3.2.3 with Digital Camera Raw 3.12.0.  I have the exact same green photo import problem described above.  I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 and I shoot RAW.  Sometimes (I can't seem to determine what triggers this), when I click on the photo and Aperture brings it up in the Split View, Aperture briefly re-processes the photo and displays it without the green tint, but now the photo is over exposed.  If I right click->remove all adjustments, then the photo finally displays correctly.
    Sometimes, Aperture tells me "This photo was adjusted using an earlier version of Apple's RAW processing".
    The fix suggested by Snoop Dogg at https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3942768?start=30&tstart=0 took away the green tint.  But now the recently imported photo is still over exposed.  By default, I turn on "Auto Enhance" on on my imports into Aperture.  I still have to right click->remove all adjustments, then the reapply the "Auto Enhance" quick fix before my photo finally displays correctly.
    Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.  Thanks.

  • Raw processing - camera compatibility

    I own a Panasonic DMC-FZ18 camera, and was about to buy the newer FZ45. However, I note that Aperture only appears to support RAW processing with the FZ100 in that range.
    Does this mean I will not be able to process RAW images with either the FZ18 or FZ45? If so, is their any likelihood that these older models will to be added to the supported list?

    Correct. Also we have no way of knowing if any particular camera will be added.
    Regards
    TD

  • How to combine Camera-Raw processed files to be viewed within Windows Explorer as processed

          The problem I have with  camera processed files is that when viewed within Explorer what you did on the file, the crop, and other effects are not visible within Windows Explorer. What is visible there is the original file--this seems to be true of the original nef file in my case.  The change does appear if you save it as a .tif, .dng or .psd but not the NEF. But if you were to open again the NEF file and the RAW Window opens you can see your changes immediately.
            I know it is because  with an original raw file nothing has been done to the image except give it instructions so to speak but Bridge does see it as such so why not let Explorer (Or other viewers, for ex. XnView) view it as such as well? Perhaps this is more a Microsoft Windows issue or what-have-you but I thought I would start to present it here first.
    Where's the question? The question is not actually for someone to explain why this is so, I think I may understand this a little but rather the question is, would it be possible to let other software such as Explorer see the raw processed file--to let it see it as Bridge sees it? Yeah I guess this may be a Windows issue but.....
       Why does this bother me? Since I don't use Photoshop or Bridge professionally I view images more often in Explorer then I do in Bridge or PS (The former is instantaneously viewable while the latter take way to long to open--and Bridge vs. XnView needs an extra step.)
            Side note: Sometimes I feel I am wasting my time and yours in writing such silly questions nevertheless they present themselves in my brain and in the process I hope to learn something from it regardless of its silliness/stupidity. It is such questions which at times creates something original, therefore creativity, after all, does it not? (Or so I tell myself in order to justify it all :-)

    You can't...
    Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    Camera Raw-compatible Adobe applications

  • RAW Processing problems with Canon 5D Mark iii

    I am having problems with the RAW files coming from my new 5D Mark iii in Aperture. I have the latest version of Aperture (and update) installed. Selecting a picture style on the 5D doesn't seem to yield any results because when I import the photo into aperture all the images go very dark. I have to pull the exposure levels up all the way to get a decent exposure. The histogram on my camera looks perfect but when imported into Aperutre the histogram changes. I have my custom picture style set to give me a very flat image (contrast off, sharpening off, saturation -2, color tone 0). The images looks very flat and perfect in my LCD but once imported into aperture the RAW processing makes it very dark. I even tried shooting the exact photo in three completely different picture styles but they all look identical once they are in aperture. What's going on??

    Here is a side by side comparison of a RAW image in the latest versions of Aperture and Lightroom. I have never had these issues with the 5D Mark II only the Mark III. As you can see Lightroom produces a nice flat image while Aperture is under-exposing the image. Any thoughts? I really want to continue to use Aperture but with my recent camera upgrade to the Mark III I don't see how this is possible. Anyones help would be much appreciated.

  • RAW Processing with Canon 5D Mark iii

    Since upgrading to Aperture 3.3.1 I started to notice a huge decrease in the sharpness of my images. I have checked previous threads and followed up on my Highlight Tone priority settings as well as Post Import Raw Process setting. Having messed around with both settings I have been unable to fix this issue. So I went ahead and downloaded a copy of Lightroom to test. Images imported into lightroom at full 1:1 previews are sharp as a tack. What could be causing my issue with Aperture. I do not want to have to switch but at this point I might not have a choice.
    I am importing mRAW files without JPG and applying no Presets. The first time I click on the image it initially loads sharp and then after a split second it becomes "blurry"
    Any one else seeing this issue still and have any advice?
    Shooting with a Canon 5D MK3.
    Thanks
    Brad

    Wish I had an answer here, but I will caution about mRAW files.  I wouldn't use them, as they are the "red-headed stepchild" of RAW files.  They are not true RAW files, and Aperture's support for them came much later than regular RAW files.
    I'd recommend shooting regular RAW files and just deleting more of the non-keepers if space is an actual consideration.
    Here's an article that goes into details (mostly on sRAW, but mRAW is the same thing, pretty much):
    http://dougkerr.net/Pumpkin/articles/sRaw.pdf

  • ACR3 RAw processing vs. LIghtroom.

    Does anyone know if the raw processing engine to be released with LIghtroom is the same as ACR's current engine? I sure hope not because all versions of ACR have had issues with rendering the Red's with a slight orange tonality to them. The results I get from Capture One are significantly better, I just hate having to use multiple software programs to get the best results. If not, is there a profile or a workaround for getting correct tonality out of Canon's Eos 1dmk2 and 1dsmk2's? I can never render correct Reds and I've tried it all.
    Any help would be great.
    Matt

    Many people in many forums with many camera models believe that ACR gets the red hue and red saturation wrong.
    Using one of the available calibration scripts, based on photographs of a GretagMacbeth ColorChecker, tends to make people happier. Once I did this, I like ACR's colours, and don't normally need to change them in Photoshop.
    For example, here is a thread about the topic:
    http://adobe.groupbrowser.com/t165599.html
    And others:
    http://adobe.groupbrowser.com/t146550.html
    http://adobe.groupbrowser.com/t146539.html
    A common adjustment in the "Calibration" tab is: red hue: about -20 or -25; red saturation: from +0 (rare) to +40, often about +25. These can be saved as defaults so that you never need to think about them again. (Blue and green may also need changes, but it is red that is so consistently wrong).

  • HT3946 Raw processing for Fuji X1 Pro

    Raw processing for Fuji X1 Pro - when can we expect it to be supported in Aperture

    This is a user forum, so none of is will know officially; you probably have found already the list of raw formats supported by Aperture: http://www.apple.com/aperture/specs/raw.html
    Apple has been rather quick with adding raw support for pro cameras lately, so keep your fingers crossed.
    Use the feedback form in the Aperture " - menu > Provide feedback to Apple" to ask for speedy raw support.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • When will Aperture 3 support RAW processing for the Canon 5D III?

    When will Aperture 3 support RAW processing for the new Canon 5D III?

    We are no phophets and also do not work for Apple -  so we don't know.
    See this thread to join into a discussion with others who also are waiting:
    Canon 5D Mk III - RAW update?
    Regards
    Léonie

Maybe you are looking for