RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales Order

Hi Everyone,
RBA GATP check is not getting invoked for Sales order.
I maintained the configuration settings for 'Rules-Based Availability Check', APO general settings (check mode, check instruction), carried out integrated rule maintenance, Rule determination for the combination of order type & product, associated the check mode to product master. Also maintained all the settings in ECC towards Req class, Req type, checking control etc.
However, sales order is not invoking RBA Check though it is showing up the 'Rule' icon in the screen. Also, in the APO Availability check in Sales order when I click onto 'check instruction', I get the checking mode that pertains to RBA for business event 'A' (Sales order). Though I have not maintained any stock for the main material for which I have the sales order, yet system is confirming any quantity that I put in.
I would expect that system would propose the same material in an alternate location where we have stock through RBA.
Request you to share ideas on this.
Regards,
Avijit Dutta

Hi Avijit,
You should used No Checking Horizon in Checking instructions and also Check your rule control settings.
What you have defined in 1st and 2nd steps. Check whether product substitution is carried out or Location Substitution.
Thanks,
Bala.

Similar Messages

  • Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer inf

    Do weblogic has some parameter in weblogic deployment descriptor like numAlarmThreads="5" minThreads="1" maxThreads="10" etc
    becoz I am facing one problem relating to timer service in EJB
    Problem Scope: Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer info (Serializable object containing the details of timer).
    Details : I am implementing EJB timer 2.1 and when ejbTimeOut execution of one timer exceeds the interval time, next timeout doesn’t happens till the execution of first ejbTimeOut completes . Ideally the timers should behave in the manner that on every interval the ejbTimeOut should occur no matter the previous timeout is completed or not
    for example : consider there is timer T whose timeout occurs every minute, and on every timeout it calls process P, so on every minute ideally container should give call to process P irrespective of the previous status of P (call is complete or not). In our case next call to process P is not happening after timeout also since it is waiting for previous call to P to get completed

    You should also cross-post this in the WebLogic EJB forum:
    WebLogic Server - EJB

  • Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer info (Serializable

    Problem Scope: Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer info (Serializable object containing the details of timer).
    Details : I am implementing EJB timer 2.1 and when ejbTimeOut execution of one timer exceeds the interval time, next timeout doesn’t happens till the execution of first ejbTimeOut completes . Ideally the timers should behave in the manner that on every interval the ejbTimeOut should occur no matter the previous timeout is completed or not
    for example : consider there is timer T whose timeout occurs every minute, and on every timeout it calls process P, so on every minute ideally container should give call to process P irrespective of the previous status of P (call is complete or not). In our case next call to process P is not happening after timeout also since it is waiting for previous call to P to get completed

    You should also cross-post this in the WebLogic EJB forum:
    WebLogic Server - EJB

  • Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer info

    Problem Scope: Concurrent timers are not getting invoked for same timer info (Serializable object containing the details of timer).
    Details : I am implementing EJB timer 2.1 and when ejbTimeOut execution of one timer exceeds the interval time, next timeout doesn’t happens till the execution of first ejbTimeOut completes . Ideally the timers should behave in the manner that on every interval the ejbTimeOut should occur no matter the previous timeout is completed or not
    for example : consider there is timer T whose timeout occurs every minute, and on every timeout it calls process P, so on every minute ideally container should give call to process P irrespective of the previous status of P (call is complete or not). In our case next call to process P is not happening after timeout also since it is waiting for previous call to P to get completed

    You should also cross-post this in the WebLogic EJB forum:
    WebLogic Server - EJB

  • Quantity is not getting conformed in sales order

    HI SD Gurus,
    i have one issue we are not able to solve i need your help, it is very urgent,
    My issue:we created sales order but quantity was not getting conformed is sales order even though we have enough stock
    but it was consumed the stock in MD04,
    we ran the SDRQCR21 program but issue is still exist,
    1. we checked all the ATP configuration  every thing is fine,
    2.we replicated the scenario in  quality it is working fine
    3.we try simulated in production but not conformed the stock
    4. total stock is in unrestricted only
    5. no block in sales order
    6. same material working fine with different plant
    7. in same plant different materials working fine
    available stock level in MMBE and MD04 is 330 qty unrestricted
    sales order created for 165
    then stock reduced in MD04 to 165,and sales order displayed in MD04 with quantity 165
    but it was not conforming the schedules in sales order(with any dates)
    I am requesting you to reply ASAP if any one faced the same scenario
    BR,
    CS

    Hi CS,
    Please check the stock availability in CO09. If CO09 shows available quantity as zero then the sales order quantity cannot be confirmed.
    Please review SAP Note Number 89362 - No confirmation despite available quantity/stock for further information on this transaction.
    You will also find further information in this document:
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-58040
    I hope this helps.
    Kind regards,
    Catherine

  • Storage location not getting determine in Sales order

    Hello All,
    Storage location not getting determined in SO, every time when i update picking i have to manually enter the storage location.
    I saw few of the response in the SCN but one thing i noticed in my system was, when i enter OVLQ i don't see OR order type, and for order type BV which is present in system assigned to MALA but still when i am creating CS order still storage location is getting determined.
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Vishwanath.

    Hi Vishwanath,
    OVLQ is Delivery type and storage location determination and not for sales order type as you assumed
    As per standard for BV cash sales order type subsequent Delivery Type is BV and hence you can see the value MALA against BV
    Just check for LF delivery type there would be storage location determination assignment
    Storage location is determined at Delivery level and not at order level
    thanks
    santosh

  • Copy 0CO_OM_WBS_5 to get variances for Sale Order / Item

    Hi ,
    I copied the existing 0CO_OM_WBS_5 extractor and modified it with a logic to bring the Result Analysis numbers for Sales Orders. But when trying to create a normal generic datasource with the FM  it is not allowing and giving me an error "E_T_DATA is not present in the the Function Module " The same is not available in standard datasource FM as well for 0CO_OM_WBS_5  .Do we need to maintain any table for mapping the datasource with FM and Extract Structure specific to the CO-OM Extractors.
    Help will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    VSK

    Thanks.

  • Queue Block (SMQ2) and no GATP invoking for Sales Order

    Hi,
    I am encountering two issues:
    - Every time I activate any integration model for customer, materials etc. it queues up in SMQ2 in ECC and on processing there it goes to the APO
    - When I create sales order it does not invoke the GATP screen. However, if I click onto the 'Item availability' button it takes me to the APO screen with a different check mode (different from the one maintained in product master)
    - On saving the sales order and then clicking 'Item availability' button again, I get the message 'Order do not exist'. Next, if I check SMQ1 in ECC I find the queue. If I try to re-process, I get the message "LUWs in status NOSEND must be picked up by the application.
    Well, we have maintained X0 for the MRP materials, did CIF manually, and have udated the product master ATP view with new check mode. We have also maintained the distribution, RFC destination, change transfer settings etc.
    Can someone please tell me as to what is it that controls the queue communication between ECC & APO or if anything else that is controlling this.
    Regards,
    Avijit

    Hi Santosh,
    We maintained this settings in /SAPAPO/C4 in APO.
    Also, we maintained Debug = 'R', Logging = 'D' (Detailed) and RFC Mode = 'Q' (Queued RFC) in CFC2 of ECC.
    Even on changing the Debugging off in APO system to "Debugging on" / "Debugging on, Recording of t/qRFCs (NOSENDS)". I get the queue in SMQ2 of APO with status 'NOEXEC' i.e. no automatic execution.
    Another info:
    The queues are CF* and for that we maintained like this:
    In ECC (T-code: SMQS): Host id of ECC system is appearing at the 'Schedular Information' section and against the Destination of SCM system we maintained Host id of ECC system once again
    In ECC (T-code: SMQR): Host id of ECC system is appearing at the 'Schedular Information' section and against CF* queue Destination with Logon data is blank
    In SCM (T-code: SMQS): Host id of SCM system is appearing at the 'Schedular Information' section and against the Destination of ECC system Host id is kept blank
    In SCM (T-code: SMQR): Host id of SCM system is appearing at the 'Schedular Information' section and against CF* queue Destination with Logon data is blank
    In the light of these, is there something , that I am missing. Please let me know.
    Regards,
    Avijit

  • Customer material info records are not  getting displayed in Sales order

    Hi ,
    We are upgrading our client sap system  from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 .We are now in the testing phase .An  issue came up  regarding customer material info records .
    When we are creating a sales order using VA01, after entering Material number and order quantity for an item  if we press the ordering party tab(before saving the sales order) the customer material info records (value in cutomer material number) are gettting displayed.But if we save the sales order we are not able to  see the customer material info records.
    kindly guide me in this issue .
    Thanks in advance .
    Nikhil

    hi nikhil,
                check the tick box in vov8 "read info record",and when you create sales order(va01),dont enter the material number enter the "customer material number" and see whether you are getting the material number.
    and also go to (va02) and check whether you are getting the CMIR details.
    pls explain me the problem in detail for my better understanding
    regards
    senya

  • Item text not getting copied into sales order from inbound Idoc

    Hi All,
    I have a scenario where in we get the sales order created through a inbound 850 idoc .
    The trading partner sends the sales order information which gets through GENTRAN and gets posted as inbound idoc in SAP .
    The problem here is that ,there are segments with values for item text in the idoc ,but the item text is not getting carried over to the sales order which is getting created because of this idoc.
    There is no problem with the header text and it is present both at the idoc as well as the sales order level.
    I have checked the configuration for text determination and everything looks fine .
    Please let me know has anyone come across a scenario like this .This is important as our EDI is getting failed when an outbound 810 is sent from SAP for the simple reason that there is no item text .
    Thanks
    Sridhar

    Hello Sridhar
    Do you have access to the genuine 850 EDI message? Does it contain the item texts? If so then there is probably a problem with the (XSLT) mapping EDI 850 -> ORDERS.ORDERS05 IDoc.
    Are you able to test the mapping independent of the EDI transmission? This way you could nail down the problem.
    Regards
       Uwe

  • Tax is not getting updated in Sales Order Pricing Conditions

    Hi ,
    Tax is not getting updated in Condition of sales order when creating Sales order but when we click on update button it is calculating correctly.
    Following are the changes for in the standard Pricing:
    1) Created ZPSC condition type to calculate the sur-charge from Z-table
    2) ZPR0 Condition type to calculate the sum of PR00 and ZPSC
    So tax has to be calculated based on the ZPSC value, but it is calculating the tax based on the PR00 base price.
    We implemented the logic for updating values of  Amount and condition values for ZPSC and ZPR0 by creating custom Routine 904 in Calculation types and assigned the routine in Pricing Procedure.The correct values are coming till NET VALUE 3 but tax is calculating based on the PR00 net price.
    I debugged the code for Tax Routine the value for Net value (NETWR) is the base value price but displaying correctly in Net value screen of Conditions tab.
    Please suggest how to update the Tax values correctly without manual update.
    Thanks ,
    Rajesh Sanapala.

    Hi Lakshmi,
    I am using a TAXINN procedure.....to correct my self can u brief me abt the CIN configuration settings required from SD point of view......how many tax codes have to be maintained for capturing the BED,EDCess,SHED cess,VAT,CST and what are the condition types required for capturing the same.....
    I am using JEXQ-A/R BED ......for capturing the BED....and so on ......I feel that i have missed out on some settings ,thats why few conditions are getting captured and some are not.....It would be great if you ca nhelp me on this.
    Thanks
    Ivy

  • Output fax not getting triggered when sales order credit block is released

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on an issue.
    I have one sales Order which has credit block.
    when we release the credit block via vkm3, then the output fax gets triggered.
    I have another sales order which has credit block,
    when we release the credit blcok via vkm3 , the output fax is NOT getting triggered.
    If any of you has worked on this setting, request your input on where to find the settings/coding for the same.
    Any advice on this please.
    Regs,
    SuryaD.
    Edited by: SuryaD on Oct 21, 2010 9:34 PM

    Hi Brad,
    Thanks for your response.
    Order 1: Issues output fax(ZFAX) correctly when block is released.(i see output zfax in te output screen)
    Order 2: Fails to issue output fax(ZFAX) even when the block is released.( i dont see any output in the output screen)
    I went to Go to -Determine analysis for both orders 1 and order 2.
    in both the analysis i am able to see the output ZFAX.
    *Analysis Output*
    *Order 1                                                                    Order 2*
    1. ZFAX                                                                   1.   ZFAX
        10(Z010)                                                                 10(Z010)
           0000122426                                                              0000122427
    2.  ZFAX                                                                   2.   ZFAX
    When i click, D.Click on the output type ZFAX on both the order Analysis output screen, i see similarities.
    There in just 2 differences as below.
    In the above screen,
    1.Order 1 ==> has some value 0000122426
    2.For Order 1==> row marked 2.(in the above screen) if i D.Click on ZFAX it says
    Diagnosis
    Output ZFAX has already been issued. Multiple issue for this output type is forbidden in Customizing.
    In the above screen
    1.Order 2 ==> has some value 0000122427
    2.For Order 2==> row marked 2.(in the above screen) if i D.Click on ZFAX it says
    No more information is available.
    Please guide as to how to initiate the debug for output processing ?
    Which screen where to switch on debugger.
    where to look further?
    Regards,
    SuryaD.
    Edited by: SuryaD on Oct 22, 2010 11:41 AM

  • Price in invoice is not getting copied from Sales order

    Hi,
    In my case when i create a sales order...my VPRS condition is taking price 4.020,24 (@335.02/PC). When i create a Invoice it is coming with 4.020,22 value and .02 is coming in different condition type ZDIF ( Rounding diff) automatically. When i check my PGI accounting document there also price 4.020,22  hits the G/L account.
    Now able to understand why .02 value is going in the ZDIF condition ?
    Need help
    Regards
    Nitin

    Hi Nitin,
    Rounding condition is coming in picture because there will some difference in PR00 and VPRS.
    Generally VPRS is a statistical condition type and it is just used for viewing purpose not a part of calculation.
    So you can go to V/08, select your pricing procedure and then control data.
    In that find out VPRS condition type and click on statistical, then it wont come in calculation.
    If you want that this should be copied then you have to made changes in copy control.
    Go to VTFA if you are making billing document with reference to order document.
    Go to VTFL if you are making billing document with reference to delivery document.
    Select your combination of billing document and delivery document/order document.
    Then go to item level and select you item category and then click on detail
    In that you will find pricing type just change that pricing type to D.
    Now it will copy pricing as it is from sales order.
    Hope so it will solve your problem
    Regards
    Raj.

  • Sales deal not getting populated in Sales order.

    Hi,
    A new custom Agreement type is created for VISTEX agreement in our company. This has condition records table with primary keys as application, condition type, Sales orgs, materia, agreement and valididty date.
    When I create a sales order for same Sales orgs, Sold to and material - it is not pulling sales deal in communication structure.What could be the reason for this. I debugged standard SAP and found that order  is not finding access sequence. Access sequence does not get any data in agreement field  which is VBAP-KNUMA_AG or KONP-KNUMA_AG. Fields is access sequence are VKORG MATNR and KNUMA_AG (table t682z).
    Can anyone please help me to know if something missing in configuartion? Ot it is because order does not have enough data to find agreement or DO I need to manualy ipopulate value of agreement in field KONP-KNUMA_AG in any of sales order user exit.
    Thanks
    Swat
    Edited by: Swati Swati on Mar 5, 2012 10:34 PM

    Let me put more information on my question. We already have an agreement type ZBAB for which a sales order is populating sales deal. But that has condtion tables with fields VKORG KUNAG (sold to) and KONDM Material Pricing Gr). When I create an order , it finds condition record number (within standard SAP logic), using above three fields ( which is VKORG KUNAG and  KONDM) from condition table A700. A700 is conditon table creted for ZBAB.
    But for this new agreement type which has condition table A777  has fields as VKORG MATNR and KNUMA_AG, it is not working.
    I suspect that it is because for the first one, we can get all field values like VKORG KUNAG and KONDM in sales order. But for 2nd one we have KNUMA_AG maintained in access sequence for which we dont have data in sales order.. so we dont have condition record number to get corresponditing agreement. But I dont know where to link this in sales order config or user exit.

  • Pricing procedure not getting determined in sales order

    Hi All
    I have did all the configuration settings for determining  the pricing procedure in the sales order,but it is not getting in the order.
    The assignment  sales area + customer pricing procedure + document pricing procedure are fine
    And in the customer master the customer pricing procedure is maintained properly
    And in document type TA,the document pricing procedure is maintained properly.
    Without IPC is it not possible to get the prcing procedure of CRM in to the sales transaction.
    I dont have IPC installed on my system.
    Appreciate ur help
    Regards
    Sreekar M

    Thanks Shalini for the information
    Then i think i cant create a billing document in CRM with reference to sales order...as the sales order is incomplete
    Is creation of delivery possible in CRM?
    Regards
    Sreekar M

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to update an existing item in a sharepoint list using the WSS adapter for Biztalk

    Is there a way that a record in SP list be updated using WSS adapter in biztalk ? BizTalk 2013 and SP 2013 .. Regards Ritu Raj When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer

  • How to store multiple format text file in a oracle table

    Hi, I want to store a file which has multiple format for field separation so is it possible in Oracle data integrator if yes then how ..... Waiting for reply regards palash

  • Exporting Folios to share with another developer?

    I did the major development on the folio for my team and now I need to hand it over to a collegaue to finish the job of publishing it. But I cannot figure out how to share it with them. If I share the folio through the Dashboard, they don't have acce

  • Is it compulsory to use %@ page language="java" % ....? in JSP

    Hi, Iam testing my JSP application in that i removed the following Page directives <%@ page language="java" %> <%@ page import="java.io.*" %> instead i used the java.io.File in my code directly,which i know is another way of using the java.io.* packa

  • Working with 3d models in Flash

    Hi I am trying to find a solution for a student I'm working with - she wants to have a 3d model to rotate very slowly (360 degrees every 24 hours) for a very specific project she is working on, my initial thoughts were that flash would be the best op