RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL No e-mails exist for execution of work items

Hi ,
We are trying to implement SRM offline approval. The system is able to send the email to the approvers, but when they click on approve, the work item does not get updated.
When i try to run report RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL it says that No e-mails exist for execution of work items. No Work Item Found for Processing. What do i need to check to resolve this. If I approve thru SRM, it is working.
Thanks,
Jograd

Hi
refer related links too
SRM : Offline approval process
Offline approval not working?
Check WF-BATCH user id has email ID?
regards
Muthu
Edited by: muthuraman on Aug 18, 2008 8:00 AM

Similar Messages

After "Configure Feature", "Changed By" field shows my name for most of work items

I recently upgraded TFS from 2010 to 2012. And I am running "Configure Feature" for every project. The configuration ran successfully. However, when I run a query, the "Changed By" field shows my name for most of work items. I thought
configuration should never touch the data. More interesting, I go to history of work items, there is no change by me at all. Now why did history and query show totally different data?
Thanks.

Hi Jason,
You can create a new work item to have a check if the same issue occurrs. To configure features, you can refer to the links below to see if you configured correctly:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff432837(v=vs.110).aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2012/05/09/how-to-configure-features-for-dozens-of-team-projects.aspx
Please elaborate more details about the configuration feature steps if the issue persists. You can also run TFS best practice analyzer to see if there configuration issues.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Report RSWUWFML to send mails to Outlook about the work item Arrival

Hello,
Report RSWUWFML to send mails to Outlook about the work item Arrival - Can we make settigns so that only work items pertaining to Leave Requests are sent to the Outlook.
Please help.
Regards,
Poornima

Hi Poornima,
RSWUWFML is very old, you should use RSWUWFML2 at least but if you are on release Basis 6.40 or above you should use Extended Notifications. As mentioned in the other posts you need to restrict your selection criteria by task TSXXXXXXX. The task associated with the work items you want to send a notifcation about. You need to open the workflow definition and open the step in th definition that corresponds to the work item.
Another way would be to highlight one of the work items in the users inbox SBWP in the backend and click the "Details" button in the toolbar. You will see the task ID listed there.
Regards,
Eddie

Iphone mail app for hotmail not working

Hi,
i have the iphone 4s and have been using the mail app to connect with my hotmail account. in the past it has never been a problem but over the last few days it has not been recognising my password or verifying the account. i have deleted the account and re-installed it...did not work, i have logged onto the account using a p c and it seems to be fine, i am able to log into my gmail account but hotmail it has a problem with. any help on this issue would be greatly appreciated.

Logging in to an email account via webmail access using a browser is not the same as connecting with the incoming mail server for an email account with an email client.
You need to contact Microsoft regarding this problem especially since there is no problem accessing your Gmail account with the iPhone's Mail app.

Disable Reject Button for Invoice on Work Item Screen

Hi! I know we can use the Dynamic Column configuration to disable and enable the Approve/Reject button on the Inbox screen where the approval work items are displayed. However, I would like to know whether it is possible to have only the Reject button disabled? Reason for asking this is a rejection reason needs to be maintained for the rejection. The check is in place if we reject the invoice from the detail screen. However, if we reject it from the Inbox screen, it will go through without any warning or error message. I have searched OSS notes but found nothing so am wondering whether this can be considered a bug or not. If not, then I want to know what solution option I have relating to this. I am thinking of either a repair to disable the button on the screen for invoice approval or find a why with the dynamic columns to do that.
Appreciate any comments on the above.
Cheers!
SF

No response

UWL for Manager : Multiple work items for approval

Hi Experts, We have a scenario when the line manager is approving the leave workitems in his UWL. And the UWL has multiple leave workitems pending for approval. When the line manager click on any of the work item in the UWL, The UWL opens the items which was first creared in the UWL rather than the one which the line manager clciked. Then line manager has to navigate to the desired work item by clicking on next button. Is their any funtionality / customization available to get only the work item which is clicked in the UWL. Please advise. Regards, IFF

I had the same issue and spent a long time correcting it including opening a OSS request with sap.
It took a combination of all almost all the notes above (1807724 is included in our current release so we didn't have to install).
But nothing worked for us until SAP directed me to the following note http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1733095 that was the final fix to all our problems.
One other thing to note is from the time we implemented the correction for note: 1946640 had changed from its original so if you implemented it before revision 3 came out you may need to update.
Hope this helps,
Martha.

Obtain Instance Id # for SWI5 Mgr work items

Hi
I need to be able to determine what the instance id #'s are for work items that managers have showing in SWI5 transaction. I am looking to get a report that has both the work item # and the associated instance number it relates to. I know that I can manually get the instance # of the workflow by clicking on the work item in SWI5 and drilling down to see the information, but is there any way I can get a report that shows me the details ?
Any help would be most appreciated.
Many thanks
Nicola.

Hi Nicola ,
If you have the workflow id you can view the entire details in SWWWIHEAD table.
To check the status of the workflow you can view the details in SWW_OUTBOX table.
I think this tables will help you to find the status of the workflow.
Thanks & Regards,
Ganesh R K

Execution of work item programatically

Hi All,
I need a function module which can execute a work item programmatically. like if the work item has two user decisions say approve or reject...
programatically if i pass the value it should be executed with that value....
Thanks,
Siddarth

Thanks for your quick reply,
But I have already seen this... this asks the user to select the decision...
but what I want is even the decision i.e. approve or reject should be passed through the FM and that will execute it automatically without asking the user for selecting the decision...
Thanks,
Sid
Thanks Sanju,
I found the funcion module by my own, which does the task....
FM : SAP_WAPI_DECISION_COMPLETE
Edited by: Siddharth Chordia on May 8, 2009 12:18 PM
Edited by: Siddharth Chordia on May 8, 2009 12:19 PM

Options for leave request work items in ECC6

We are upgrading our backend system from R/3 4.7 to ECC6. I am not very impressed with the leave request authorisation process and wondered if there are any other options open to us.
In 4.7, leave requests were workflowed to the requester's manager with a subject like this:
Process leave request from <fromdate> to <todate> submitted by <person>
When the manager selected it, they only see that request.
In ECC6 (using task 12300111 and the Webdynpro 'Leave Request: Approval') the subject in the inbox is;
<person>'s Leave Request
When the manager opens the item they see all leave request from all staff, despite this, they can only process one item at a time. Once completed, they are given an option to Approve Another Absence - but the link does not work. I can remove that link using ctrl-right-click, but was wondering;
1 Has anyone got the "Approve Another Absence" link working when the iView is launched from the UWL?
2 Has anyone managed to put the details of the request into the subject?
3 Has anyone managed to setup bulk authorisation of multiple requests in one step?
4 Has anyone managed to restrict the workitem to only display a single request?

Bharghava.K,
I've implemented a work around for this - I've added the following UWL configuration file as a high priority:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'>
<UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
<ItemTypes>
    <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.TS12300097" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="launchIView" executionMode="default">
      <ItemTypeCriteria externalType="TS12300097" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
      <Actions>
        <Action name="launchIView" groupAction="" handler="IViewLauncher" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="yes" launchNewWindowFeatures="resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,status=yes,toolbar=no,menubar=no,location=no,directories=no">
          <Properties>
            <Property name="iview" value="pcd:portal_content/com.sap.pct/every_user/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.bp_folder/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.iviews/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.working_time/com.sap.pct.erp.ess.leaverequestapprover"/>
          </Properties>
          <Descriptions default="launchIView"/>
        </Action>
      </Actions>
    </ItemType>
</ItemTypes>
</UWLConfiguration>
Check the "Leave Request: Apporval" iView's ID if you try this - I don't know if ours is in the 'standard' place within the PCD.

Execution of work items

Hello,
we have some unprocessed work items in workflow with status Error. we would like to post, is there any standard job to process all Errro items at a single time !!
Regards,
Ramesh.

Hello,
This transaction SWPR didn't pick up the work items, we executed through SWI1 still the process and workflow log did not completed. Below error has occured "Fork from node 362 has not been released again yet"
Please suggest
Regards,
Ramesh.

Standard object for open ar line items charge backs

Hello there,
can any body tell me whether any standard object exists for open AR line Items Charge Backs.
Regards
Janapathi

Hi,
As per my knowledge, there is no standard object available for AR neither for AP.
Thanks & Regards,
Sandip Kamdar

Error in WEB IC FOR WORK ITEM "Choose an assignment reason"

We are getting an error in WEB IC where user is trying to resubmit the work item by giving the resubmission date, re submission reason , Status, and sub status
but when users are trying to save it they are getting an error i.e. "Choose an assignment reason" and they are not able to complete the process
I know there is config for maintaining "Define Reasons for Assignment of Work Items" in SPRO under work items, but this config is not applicable since we are not assigning work item to a new unit and/or a new collection specialist, or removing any assignment. we are just re submitting the work items
Any help on this will be highly appreciated.

Hi,
Just a thought - on a couple of my previous projects we had some custom CRM Fron-end validation between Work Item Sub Status and either re-assignment reason and/or Closing result code.
Perhaps check with your Development support team to ensure no such cross-validation exists upon saving.
Regards,
Ivor Martin

Alignment of body for work item via SWNCONFIG

Hi All,
As per my present client scenario, every work item will be sent to UWL and external mail also. It means, user wants to execute the work item from external mail (Gmail or outlook)through SWNCONFIG transaction. Here my issue is as follows.
I am getting the below issue when work item goes to external mail.
Body sequence is out of alignment as you can see it in Red color below(You can observe the placement of the symbol u2018:u2019 is out of alignment).
Actual Output Required:
Item #                         : &MATNR&
Description                    : &WA_MARA.MAKTX&
Item type                      : &WA_MARA.ITEMTYPE&
Project ID                     : &WA_MARA.LPID&
Product Group                  : &WA_MARA.PRODUCTGRP&
Purchase / Manufacture value   : &WA_MARA.PUR_MAN_VALUE&
PDM Status                     : &WA_MARA.PDMSTATUS&
Life Cycle Status              : &WA_MARA.LCSTATUS&
Task sent by                   : &WA_MARA.ZUSER&
Actual Output Obtained At Present:
Item # : 1111
Description : PDM Data
Item type : PHysical Item
Project ID : Local Project ID
Product Group : Product Group
Purchase / Manufacture value : P
PDM Status : PDM Status
Life Cycle Status : Life cycle
Task sent by :
Please let me know the solution for this asap.I would really appreciate you for your help in this.
Thanks in advance..

Hi!
You can try playing around with mail formats in SWNCONFIG, provided work item text is formatted using tabs, however I do not think that will help. You should format task description using SAPscript formatting symbols - SWN_SELSEN should convert it to correct output format.
Or you can create work item description in HTML - that should keep formatting everywhere. Use tab "Work item display" in your WF step, there is a demo f-n module SWL0_PREVIEW_DEMO_HTML that can be used as example.
WBR -
Pauls

How to calculate Time difference for a single line item

Hi All,
I have an issue where you have to calculate the Start time and End Time , Start Date and End Date for a particular Work item number
For eg ;
WI_ID WI_CD WI_CT
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:48:4 02/09/2009 09:48:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:54:4 02/09/2009 09:54:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 09:54:5 02/09/2009 09:54:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:07:0 02/09/2009 10:07:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:07:0 02/09/2009 10:07:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:16:5 02/09/2009 10:16:9
000001312610 02/09/2009 10:16:7 02/09/2009 10:16:9
Similarly I get the Endtime and ENd dayfrom other table for same work item.So my requirement here is
in the it should show the display in a single cell .as, 5secs, 5 secs,4 secs,9secs,4 secs,2 secs
for each work item.
Can any body help me on this issue.
Any pionters for this are much helpful for me.
Thanks
Rohini.

Timestamp is date and time together in one field..
Search for data element TIMESTAMP.
If you are getting this in your table.
If you are getting time and date in different fields then you can use the function module
given below....
CALL FUNCTION 'DELTA_TIME_DAY_HOUR'
EXPORTING
    t1            =
    t2            =
    d1            =
    d2            =
IMPORTING
   MINUTES       =
Then you can convert minutes into seconds..
Function module credit to BrightSide it works....but only it will give difference in minutes
Regards,
Lalit Mohan Gupta.

Work items creating for GoodsMovement IDOCS

Hi Friends,
We have IDOC to File and File to IDOC scenario, we are able to post GRN files into SAP successfully, but for some idocs , work items are creating for some line items where there is error . After analysis we have come to know that there is some error in article or price is missing.
what i would like to know is instead of creating idoc for some items success and some with work items ,can we restrict if there is error in any line item.
for example:
let us say if i have one GRN file with 10 line items.when i post this File into SAP .. It post 7 items as success and for 3 items it creates workitems.
1) Is there anyway i can restrict the entire idoc , instead of posting 7 items once and after re-processing 3 items in second one.?
2) how to avoid creating work items?
one more thing I have created a backgrounduser for PI while posting to SAP. Some articles are showing as article is locked by piuser.
can anyone suggest how to overcome this..
Regards,
Suman

Suman
What is the Message type / IDOC type your are using? You should be able to create one single IDOC with multiple line items instead of one IDOC for each item, provided the header information for the material document is the same for all the line items. In most cases this is possible.
Check your mapping in XI and see if you can club all the items in one single IDOC. Doing so will also prevent the material locked issue. But, point to note with this design is that you will be penalizing good records in your file just because one line item was in error.
KK

RBBP_OFFLINE_EVAL No e-mails exist for execution of work items

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for