RBDAPP01 and VI01 Cost Doc posting

Hi Frnds,
I have in incoming IDOC which carries Shipment and cost document data.
For some reason this IDOC, in partner profile, has been set as "Trigger by background Program". So as soon as the IDOC reaches the system (ECC 6.0) the status is set to 64.
And the program "RBDAPP01" has been scheduled in background to trigger this IDOC. This IDOC posts changes to already created shipment document and also creates the Cost document for that particular shipment.
During this Process, the IDOC is set to 64 status as soon as it arriaves and background program triggers it. After then, the IDOC makes changes to the corresponding shipment document but it could not create the cost document.
PS: The shipment is changed using the BDC on VT02 and cost document is created using BDC on VI01.
However if i change the setting in partner profile as "Trigger immediately", the IDOC automatically gets posted and it changes the shipment data and creates the cost document successfully using the same BDC programs. Or if i execute the program "RBDAPP01" manually then also this IDOC status is set to 53 from 64 and all the relevant data gets updated properly in the system.
Can you please give me some idea as to why this is happening. We want to keep the setting as "Trigger by background Program" and have the "RBDAPP01" job scheduled in background as its the requirement from our client.
With many thanks in advance,
Karthick C

Hi,
Use conversion_exit_alpha_input in the report to convert the cost center to internal format.
Regards
Praveen

Similar Messages

Batch job for shipment and shipment cost doc

Dear all,
In case of our client, shipment docs and shipement cost docs are created using a batch job. There are some documents that have not been processed with this batch jobs as expected. Now i want to analyse the job log for thosse failures. For this i want to know the batch job names which i am unaware of. In SM37 i am unable to trace in a generic way.
I know that we can filter batch jobs using ABAP Prog. My question is that which programs have to be used here. are these RV56TRGN for shipment docs and RV56TRSL fir shipment cost docs?? Plz help as the issue needs serious attention ffom my side. also suggest how further i have to rectify this issue.
Regds,
Raghu

Hello,
The ABAP programs you have mentioned are correct and you can enter these in SM37 to check the job names, status etc.
RV56TRGN - creating shipment docs
RV56TRSL - Shipment costs
Check the spool for messages which will have the error docs.
Cheers !

Two Shipment and Shipping cost docs using a single delivery doc.

SAP Gurus,
I'v a delivery document with a single line item and i would like to create two shipmt and shipping cost document since the material movement will be handled by two different freight vendors from the point of origin - transfer - Destination. I have a route setup for these stages, and i assigned each service agent to each stage(legs) and also marked each leg is shpcost-relv. My question is the system keeps creating only two shipment doc without any service agent on a header level but its not creating any shpping cost doc.
Thanks

Please post into Logistics Execution forum. MM forum is not the right place for this question.
Regards,
Dominik Modrzejewski

Delivery - Shipment and Shipment cost docs

Hi,
I created delivery and completed invoicing , when I tried to create shipment doc with VT01N , Its asking for tranportation planing point and shipment type. FYI I have configured routes , legs(Direct leg) and shipment doc types.My question is , is there any way to link delivery document to shipment docu and dhipment cost document?
Is there any field in delivery type to link with shipment doc ?
Is there anything to do with copying controls for this?
what is the T.code to maintain condition records(header and item) for shipment cost document?
can anyone help me on this
Thanks,
Kanna.

Hi kanna,
I support sarthak mohanty. Yes usually if you are using Transportaion in your business process. then the PGI definately takes place through Shipment only.
Even i do not understand until you complete PGI how did you manage getting an Invoice. Is it Proforma Invoice that was you created before PGI or Wher exactly PGI Takes place in your process. Let us know so that we can give you better info.
Now coming to Process point:
Transportation Planning Point (TPP) is the Highest Organizational unit like SD has Sales Organization.
Each company code contain their own TPP. There are no Copy controls from Delivery to Shipment. the only way to connect Delivery with shipment is you have to assign delivery to shipment then all the relevant info copied into shipment from the delivery.
To create a Shipment you need Shipment Type and TPP.
Based on your transportaion models Shipment Type varies like Order Types OR,CR,DR etc.......
You can use T-Code TK11 to maintain the condition Record, TK12 - to Change and TK13 - to Display
Regards
Venkat

Reversing A/P Invoice posted with wrong date and inventory cost adjustment

Here's the situation:
We had a PO dated 9/1/09 for items with a cost of $14.50, a Goods Receipt was entered 9/15/09 for the items with the same cost on the PO of $14.50. Somehow the order got lost in the mix and the AP invoice wasn't entered until today, with a posting date of 1/21/10 and the cost was corrected per the original vendor invoice to the right amount of $19.33. The invoice was actually dated 9/15/09. This resulted in hitting the vendor, purchases clearing and the inventory account (for the cost adjustment) in January 2010 when it should have occurred in September 2009.
The inventory itself has come and gone in the time between the GR and when the invoice was done with the incorrect date. Normally I would try to reverse the transaction with a Credit Memo and start over, however since the inventory side happened so long ago, I don't see any way of easily going backwards. I thought about doing service CM/invoice but what I am most concerned about is having the inventory valuation occur properly at the correct time. I'm not sure how to go about this.
Using SAP B1 2007A PL42 with moving average inventory.
Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Nicole,
I am afraid you may not have ability to do the adjustment based on historical date that long times ago. You know, the moving average has limited calculation based on current quantity and cost. There are no options to go backward especially new year is coming.
Thanks,
Gordon

Shipment freight cost not posted for 4th vendor after GR

Hello,
I have tested and found that isystem limits the number of vendors in Shipment to 3 only.
It sort all the vendors in the shipment and create the entries for 1st three vendors (after sorting smallest to largest vendor number) and after GR posting it creates the entires in accouting doc for 3 vendors only.
I have 5 stages in the shipment and 5 items in shipment cost doc. If number of vendors are upto 3 it works fine if there are 4 or more vendors are added then it doesnot create the entries for those vendors.
Please suggest.
regards,
JPS

Hello,
Any idea.

Problem during creation of shipment document and shipment cost document

Hi
My client facing problem during creation of shipment document and shipment cost document at the time of Batch Job
Delivery no 897654: goods issue on 30.11 at 13:22. Shipment on 30.11 (VT01N).
Shipment costs on 1.12 (VI01).
the problem is the shipment document get created on 30.11.2010 but the shipment cost document get created on 1.12.2010
pleas advice.

Hi,
Please check the batch job processing log.
As per my understanding, business requires to generate the Shipment & Shipment cost documents immediatley.
However there is some time between the documents creation time. I dont see any issue in the data or problem in the delivery docs Because system will not generate the shipment docs after 1 or 2 days if there is an issue with the data . There must be problem in the Batch Job.
Analyse the batch jobs and timing of the job process.
Let us know your feedback...
Best Regards,
MKumar

Batch wise actual material consumption and activity cost

hi
my client is steel industry, client requirement is heat wise actual material and machine cost. Heat is a batch number, how i can check batch wise actual material consumption and machine cost.
regards
imdad

Hi Imdad
Whats the batch definition in your case?? have you designed One batch per Prod order or One batch per GR?
If its one batch per Prod order - you can directly see the prod order.. however, chances are less for this as Steel company might be using PCC i.e. repetitive mfg
If its one batch per GR - Then you will have to track using the Confirmation no because each Confirmation will trigger the Goods Issue and Activity Confirmations...
Using Table AFRU - You can track the individual Confirmation no and also the Activity Qty confirmed....COSS / COSSD will have the Activity Cost
If any goods mvt are posted during the Confirmation, you would see a Mat Doc No populated in the field "Mat Doc"
Br, Ajay M

Rework Production Order not able to confirm and no cost calculation

Hi Guys,
During rework production order confirmation system giving error message as below:
[Item category 01001 not allowed in accounting transaction 0000/0001
Message no. GLT2001
Diagnosis
The online document splitting is active in your system. Here, each document is assigned to a accounting transaction variant and each document row to an item category. You determine for each business transaction variant which item categories can or must be posted here.
The following error occurred for the document you entered:
Item category 01001 in accounting transaction 0000, variant 0001 is no allowed.
System Response
The document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Check the document entered, the derivation of the business transaction variant, the derivation of the item category, and the assignment of the item categories to the business transaction variant.
Procedure for System Administration]
This error relating to New G/L split functionality such as the document type and G/L accounts document type. Doc type is using as same as normal production order and normal production order confirmations and other activities are posted successfully. Iu2019m in a puzzle, regards to this behavior of rework order?
Back ground for rework order:
Rework order was created through trigger points.
Rework order doesn't have any material, it has to pick and settle to original production order; the same was defined at re-work order settlement.
Rework order not doing any cost calculations at production order level itu2019s giving a message as below:
Object was not costed
Message no. CK060
Diagnosis
The system could not find any entries that are relevant to costing.
System Response
The system did not cost the object.
Procedure
Check whether the following objects should be flagged as relevant to costing:
- Items in the BOM
- Display BOM
- Operations in the routing
- Control key in the routing
1. Look at the message log.
2. Check whether a quantity was specified in the confirmation.
Will some one throw some light to come out from this situation and what I missed out and what need to be maintained exactly Plz.
Thanks in advanceu2026Vyas

Hi Mangalraj,
Have check the BOM & Routing for Parent production order costing check box is for both. Coming to rework order doesn't have any material, though it has pulled the some material cost from parent production order. The same can see at production order costs>analysis, but where as costs>itemization not able to see and mesage issued like: object was not costed.
as early mentioned, confirmation level same error.
Hope this may give some idea on this case, thanks for your time on this.
Looking forward some light.
Thanks...Vyas

Open sales orders and open deliveries and open billing doc to sap from legesy

Dear all
i have some open sales orders and open deliveries and open billing doc are there in the legesy system
so i want to know how to transfer the doc to sap by using lsmw plz tell me

Hi Amith,
it is always good to search in Google before posting .LSMW is very old topic and i am sure you will get lots of Documents on this .Please go through the below link .you will get some idea on this.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/1012472
there are 14 steps in LSMW and it is same for all (master data and Transaction Data)
Pls practice this in your sand box or quality system before working it in the client requirement.
Hope this helps to you
Regards
Sundar

Billing doc posting confirmation

Hi Gurus,
I wish to get confirmation on the following:
1. Billing Doc posting status is to indicate if accounting doc has been created which means posted or not.
2. A billing doc can be save without posting docs to accounting (due to say posting block?) and in this case the posting status is something like posting doc not yet created.
3. If posting status = posting doc created, this also implies that in the overall status status of billing doc = completed.
Have a nice day.
regards
M Russo

1) Yes you are correct
2) It could also be due to Error in Accounting interface or pricing error
3) If an accounting document is created, then the status would be "C"
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

How to calculate the Current APC (Acquisition and Production Cost)

Hi,
Please help me how to calculate the Current APC.
The Current APC (Acquisition and Production Cost) is a calculated value based on Previous Year Acquisition balance plus any value changes up to the time of the report.
The Asset History Report (RAGITT_ALV01) calculates the Current APC value &
The Current APC can also be found in the Asset Explorer (transaction code AW01N) under Country Book 10/ Posted Values tab then the line Acquisition Value and column Posted values.
I suppose that the calculation of Current APC (Acquisition and Production Cost) is getting done in the GET statements in the report RAGITT_ALV01, but unable to find the actual logic.
Please help me.
Thanks in advance,
Satish

Hi,
you'll find the logic in fm FI_AA_VALUES_CALCULATE
A.

ERS and delivery costs

Hi guys,
We have following two problems in case of ERS vendors.
1) We have certain delivery costs also in purchase order. The same vendor will receive material payment and freight related payments. In MRRL transaction, we select "Selected goods items + Planned del costs" and run MRRL. But after this also, amount excluding freight amount is posted in the invoice and delivery cost is not being picked for invoice. How to get material cost + delivery cost also in one invoice
2) In another scenario, we have different freight vendor. For this we are configuring ERS for delivery costs also. But the problem is in configuration we have to mention the vendor code in "Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs". Can we give vendor code as " * " here? Or is there any other way of doing configuration without mentioning vendor code and it is applicable for all vendors ?
Please suggest the solution for the above two problems.

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for ur reply. This will work. But my problem is with this, we have to include all the freight vendors in configuration. But we do not know how many vendors are there for the company. If any new vendor is created, who has to enter this in the configuration..
Is there any other way of making this functionality applicable for all vendors.
Other problem is in our PO we have basic rate and 3 to 4 delivery costs,. We have made 103 and then 105 and run ERS run and arranged payment to material vendor (it is same for both material and freight)
But for some reason we are making return delivery against material document with 105 movement. When we run MRRL for this, it will generate credit memo for the quantity returned to vendor. But delivery costs are also added. We want to avoid delivery costs in credit memo and it should only take material cost
How to acheive this? Please help me out

So, iDisk (great with MobileMe) is closed! Ok. I got the most expensive iCloud Plan and LOVED storing files online. Is that REALLY OVER??!! (besides Numbers', Pages', and Keynote's docs sync).. Will I REALLY have to downgrade to "free" on iCloud?!!

So, iDisk (great with MobileMe) is closed! Ok. I got the most expensive iCloud Plan and LOVED storing files online. Is that REALLY OVER??!! (besides Numbers', Pages', and Keynote's docs sync).. Will I REALLY have to downgrade to "free" on iCloud and PAY for "DropBox", "Google Drive" or "Microsft's Sky Whatever.."?!!
I could not log in to this Support Community with my UPDATED Apple ID (and this is another issue I can't believe Apple just says "NO, you CAN'T!" - deleting other (old) Apple IDs we've created by mistake or a long time ago and being able to have it all on ONE SINGLE UPDATED Apple ID - ALSO saving Apple's storage servers, etc.).
Anyway, my Apple ID for better communication is [email protected] (but I really couldn't log in here - it kept saying that the e-mail is already registered, etc. I know it, I'm trying to use it here, that's all...
So, really. Of course a lot of people don't care about the iDisk issue. That's fine, we all love and hate specific apps or software.. But why has Apple just shut it down, since it was so EASY to use (as DropBox) on all our Apple devices?!! So, we really can't upload/store any kind of files anymore and that's it?!
I used iDisk when MobileMe was still alive, and it was great to have my files from work, home, any backup (whatever we want) uploaded and synced and used in our Macs, iPhones and iPads. If we have the OPTION of an iCloud Plan (the top one, for example), but we just don't like the automatick backups for the iPhones and iPads, nor the Pictures' sync function.. Why can't we just have the SAME simple and efficient/great service of the iDisk installed in each device?!
Do we really have to go back and downgrade back to the free iCloud Option (just for keeping the e-mail) and paying extra for DropBox, Google, Microsoft, any other services?! I have nothing against them - I actually have DropBox and it works great because it REMINDS me of iDisk!! But WHY NOT just keep it simple and closed with 1 company/platform/option - Apple's iOS, OSX, etc.
That's why I decided to have a Macbook Pro, an iPhone 4S and an iPad 3rd. Generation (for example, along with other products and services such as Apple TV).. I know I'm CHOOSING to stay with 1 world, that's fine. And that's why I didn't (yet) go for a Samsung phone or another tablet.. I wanna stick with 1 pattern and I have chosen Apple's..
Just can't understand such an innovative company make such decisions (such as shutting down iDisk or not letting us just DELETE Apple IDs we do NOT use anymore).. Please, just some guidance or confirmation if that's correct: No way of uploading files others than Numbers', Pages' or Keynote's!!??
Thank you very much!!
Peace.

Thank you Roger.
That's exactly what I was afraid of...
During all the time I have been a loyal customer of Apple's products and services, these have been the only 2 issues that I really can't understand (specially when we look at Apple's strategies and management)...
1) Not being able to DELETE (simply delete or deactivate) old or duplicated Apple IDs... I have 3 different Apple IDs but only one is the real Apple ID I use for everything, with all my purchases and services (such as e-mail) related to it (Why won't Apple jus let people delet, deactivate or - at least - merge Apple IDs?! That would help everyone, including Apple when we think about costs, storage, database maintenance, etc.) - Actually, even when I gave up on trying to delete other Apple IDs, I tried to have the one I really use and have organized to use my @me.com address as the Apple ID itself (as Apple asks us to do - and makes sense, of course). But never worked. Just because I created that Apple ID with a @hotmail.com account (since it asks for a valid e-mail when you create an Apple ID, it NEVER lets me now change my Apple ID to my @me.com e-mail address - I mean JUST having my @me.com e-mail address as my primary e-mail and my Apple ID (for example, having that old @hotmail.com e-mail address out of it, cleaned..)!
2) The other issue was this one, about iDisk. Of course there must be reasons for having it shut down, maybe the apps used by iPhone and iPad, along with the folder on Mac OSX, is way too complicated, expensive, full of bugs, I don't know. But if we decide to pay for 50GB of online storage, why even THINK about different options for files we use?! I have Dropbox, I've read about Google Drive and Microsoft SkyDrive, etc. But I just wanted to STICK with a single ALL-APPLE solution.. That is.. Pay the annual fee for the 50GB and just still keep any file I want on the cloud with iDisk. So, what Apple tells me is that if I have other files than iWork or PDF (and some few exceptions), I should actually downgrade to "free" iCloud and decide to PAY for another solution (organization), such as DropBox, Google Disk or Drive (I don't really know), Micrsoft's SkyDrive..
Of course there's the strategy of getting more and more people to use Pages, Numbers and Keynote (buying them for iOS and Mac OSX, as I already have and love them). But "killing" iDisk and just telling users to look for other storage solutions doesn't really sound like Apple.
I have seen so many questions here about both issues (deleting or merging Apple IDS + iDisk back since we pay for storage) that I really believe Apple should reconsider these issues or, at least, open the issue and let us know what would be the best "partner solution" for iCloud...
Thanks a lot!
All the best...
Eduardo Rocha.
[email protected]

Account 'Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs' could not be found for a

dear all
when i am posting periodic asset postings through ASKB below error is comming ple help
Account 'Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs' could not be found for area 90
Message no. AU133
Diagnosis
When creating the accounting document, the system could not find account 'Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs' in depreciation area 90 for company code SCIL.
Procedure
Enter this account in the account determination for Asset Accounting.
thanks

Dear bikkina.prakash
please check were you properly maintained the AO90 for GLs for Depreciation
also check whether you changed any depreciation key in asset master(means previously you run depreciation. by mistakenly any body changed)
Regards
shankar

RBDAPP01 and VI01 Cost Doc posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for