RBPD results does not match the usage of transaction in the system

Hi,
I have performed an RBPD analysis on a Solar01 project and have found many transactions which have been used in the managed system.
However there is a huge discrepancy between the number of usage we found in the RBPD analysis and the actual usage in the managed system
for example the transaction VA11 is shown to have been executed more than 80,000 times but there are less than 1000 Inquiry document in the system.
It is possible that not everytime the transaction VA11 is executed an Inquiry will be saved and also if there are multiple windows which are opened in VA11 that will also be counted. However still there is a huge difference between the numbers.
Also the EWA was not configured in the same Solution Manager in which I performed the RBPD. It was loaded from another Solution Manager. Can there be an issue while loading the data of EWA from another Solution Manager?
What can be the possible reason for such a huge discrepancy.
Regards,
Vishal

Hi Vishal,
UPL is based on kernal Exe hits, it is not actually based on any tables or EWA. It actually counts number of times the methods, function modules got called . You cant really compare the UPL value with any of these entries. more over UPL count only objects, fm, methods usage
The object usage tab in RBPD is not exactly representing UPL. This get data from n number of sources. It brings the data from EWA ( for transactions from st03N ), e2e diagnosstics, upl ( for objects usage) and also rfc used in charm ( for badi and others).
refer here Display object usage
The link is totally different from UPL recording, refer here, Objects recorded by UPL
this given clear statement that UPL is totally different provide more accurate data than other sources.
The case, why SAP broght UPL concept, is very simple, because regular workload stats will be counting only the direct calls, means it wont consider the calling by other programs, UPL is cross client, so its more accurate.
Hence the entries which is shown in Analysis project result is fine,
Thanks and Best regards,
Jansi

Similar Messages

DI: Stock Transfer error (Unique field value does not match the system ...)

Hi
I made an add-on that makes stock transfers via DI API. The add-on has been running for two months with more than 10,000 stock transfers with almost no problems.
The company that is using the add-on have all their products managed by serial/batch numbers.
But just with one transfer Im getting the error in the stock transfer Add() method:
"Unique field value does not match the system serial number [(----)29-52]"
And I tried to debug it without success, I checked that the system serial numbers exists in the origin warehouse and are available. And I really can't find where is the problem.
If somebody knows what this error means, please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Allan

Hi János, thanks for your answer.
I found what was the problem, it was not exactly what you told me, but you gave me some insights to found the problem.
The thing is that Im using UDT's to store the information of stock transfers (before creating a real SAP stock transfer), because of the funcionality of the add-on. After some user have done some steps or validations, the add-on actually does the real SAP stock transfer.
The problem here was that my tables had some InternalSerial for some Item, for example the serial A-234, and before the real SAP stock transfer was made, they changed the serial from A-234 to A234 (in the serial number management). So the add-on was trying to create the transfer with the serial A-234, but the serial A-234 no longer exists.
I have to create a validation that if they change the serial number for an item, I have to change it in my UDT's.
On the other hand, Im not sure, but I think that I read before that you made a Warehouse Management add-on. This add-on that Im working now is a kind of warehouse management.
Im having a lot of headaches because the poor accessibility to the user fields in the OSRI and OIBT tables. Im sure that you have faced problems with this. If you have any tips or advices about this it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Regards
Allan

Server failed to start: The domain path does not match the running server

Hi,
I've configured Eclipse to run my local weblogic - which actually is working fine.
The server starts as intended and reaches state RUNNING.
As soon as this happens, OEPE tries to validate the server and compares the identified server's configuration to the expected configuration.
This finally results into the error message shown in the subject -- though server is still running.
!MESSAGE Server watcher[Oracle WebLogic Server 11gR1 PatchSet 1 at localhost]:The domain path does not match the running server.
Domain RootDirectory retrieved from the MBean of running server is: N:\Oracle\MIDDLE~1\USER_P~1\domains\MYWEBL~1\
Domain RootDirectory of this server: N:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\myWeblogicServer
Obviously this seems to be an issue with the length of the directory and file names. The domain's configuration and all its start scripts do not have any 8+3 pathes, like USER_P~1 for user_projects. Nevertheless the MBean of the server returns such a "truncated" path which in turn is invalid for OEPE.
Fix: When setting up the domain in Eclipse, try using that 8+3 representation of the domain's location. Then the comparison will succeed...
My Question: Where do we need to ask for a fix in OEPE? The 8+3 path is still a valid one ...
Best Regards
Philipp

I haven't been able to reproduce this and 8+3 representation of the domain's location shouldn't be required.
Can you provide more information:
- is this a network drive?
- what is your OS: XP, Vista, Win7?
- what is the Windows file system type, is it FAT or NTFS
- Can you try install WLS on C:, e.g. C:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects and see if it still happens?

Could not load file or assembly 'log4net, Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040

Please assist I am on a Windows 7 64 bit machine I have VS 2010 and have been fighting with this new program that I was brought on to help with - Issue is that I am unable to get rid of this issue. There is so many solutions but none have worked. If someone can give me some help with what has worked for you.
The error is Could not load file or assembly 'log4net, Version=1.2.10.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=692fbea5521e1304' or one of its dependencies. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131040)
This is with CR installed on 64 bit.
Thank you very much for any assistance with this problem,
Kris

Hi Vittorio
Please enter the search string 'log4net crystal net' into the search box in the top right corner. When the results come up, click on the Support Notes link. That will filter for the KBAs that you want to have a look at.
- Ludek
Senior Support Engineer AGS Product Support, Global Support Center Canada
Follow us on Twitter

Sharepoint error - Search Issue - The content type text/html; charset=utf-8 of the response message does not match the content type of the binding (application/soap+msbin1).

i see this error everywhere - In ULS logs, on site. On the site > Site settings > search keywords; I see this -
The content type text/html; charset=utf-8 of the response message does not match the content type of the binding (application/soap+msbin1). If using a custom encoder, be sure that the IsContentTypeSupported method is implemented properly. The first 1024 bytes of the response were: '<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <title>IIS 7.0 Detailed Error - 500.19 - Internal Server Error</title> <style type="text/css"> <!-- body{margin:0;font-size:.7em;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;background:#CBE1EF;} code{margin:0;color:#006600;font-size:1.1em;font-weight:bold;} .config_source code{font-size:.8em;color:#000000;} pre{margin:0;font-size:1.4em;word-wrap:break-word;} ul,ol{margin:10px 0 10px 40px;} ul.first,ol.first{margin-top:5px;} fieldset{padding:0 15px 10px 15px;} .summary-container fieldset{padding-bottom:5px;margin-top:4px;} legend.no-expand-all{padding:2px 15px 4px 10px;margin:0 0 0 -12px;} legend{color:#333333;padding:4px 15px 4px 10px;margin:4px 0 8px -12px;_margin-top:0px; border-top:1px solid #EDEDED;border-left:1px solid #EDEDED;border-right:1px solid #969696; border-bottom:1px solid #969696;background:#E7ECF0;font-weight:bold;'.
I am facing issues in searching, my managed metadata service is not running, search results page throws internal error. Any Idea why this above error comes.
P.S: We use windows authentication in our environment.

Hi IMSunny,
It seems you have solved this issue based on your another post.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/aa468ab0-1242-4ba8-97ea-1a3eb0c525c0/search-results-page-throws-internal-server-error?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Installing ST-A/PI Addon : "OCS package SAPKITAB9L does not match the current software component vector"

Dear Gurus,
When i try to install ST-A/PI Addon from SPAM and select queue : OCS package SAPKITAB9L does not match the current software component vector
My downloads ;
1 - SAPKITAB9J ==> CSN0120061532_0073055.PAT (ST-A/PI , 01Q_731 , Package Level=0000) downloaded from
ST-A/PI 01Q_731 (INSTALLATIONS AND UPGRADES)
2 - SAPKITAB9K==> CSR0120031469_0081131.PAT (ST-A/PI , 01Q_731 , Package Level=0001) downloaded from
ST-A/PI 01Q_731 (SUPPORT PACKAGES AND PATCHES)
3 - SAPKITAB9L==> CSR0120031469_0076956.PAT   (ST-A/PI , 01Q_731 , Package Level=0002)
ST-A/PI 01Q_731 (SUPPORT PACKAGES AND PATCHES)
I placed them under EPS and uploaded succesfully when i "Load Packages" from " "from Application Server"
What could be problem ?
Here is system components ;
SAP_BASIS
740
0005
SAPKB74005
SAP Basis Component
SAP_ABA
740
0005
SAPKA74005
Cross-Application Component
SAP_GWFND
740
0005
SAPK-74005INSAPGWFND
SAP Gateway Foundation 7.40
SAP_UI
740
0006
SAPK-74006INSAPUI
User Interface Technology 7.40
PI_BASIS
740
0005
SAPK-74005INPIBASIS
Basis Plug-In
ST-PI
2008_1_710
0007
SAPKITLRE7
SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
BI_CONT
757
0001
SAPK-75701INBICONT
Business Intelligence Content
BI_CONT_XT
757
0001
SAPK-75701INBICONTXT
Business Intelligence Content for Bobj I
SAP_BW
740
0005
SAPKW74005
SAP Business Warehouse
CPMBPC
801
0005
SAPK-80105INCPMBPC
CPM Business Planning and Consolidation
POASBC
100_731
0005
SAPK-10205INPOASBC
POA Shared Business Components

in 000 client but now i am getting DUMP ;
Category               ABAP Programming Error
Runtime Errors         CALLBACK_REJECTED_BY_WHITELIST
ABAP Program           SAPLSTPA
Application Component BC-CTS
What happened?
    An RFC callback has been prevented due to no corresponding whitelist
    entry being configured. The original RFC called function module "RFC_TP" in
    the target system with destination "CALLTP_WindowsNT". The callback called
     function
    module "TRINT_PROGRESS_INDICATOR" in its own system.
Error analysis
    Function module "RFC_TP" was called. This execute an RFC callback via ABAP
    statement CALL FUNCTION 'TRINT_PROGRESS_INDICATOR' DESTINATION 'BACK'
    . This action resulted in this ABAP short dump.
    This action was triggered explicitly by the application in transaction
    "SAINT               " and in ABAP main program "SAPLSAINT_UI".

AADSTS50011: The reply address does not match the reply addresses configured for the application

Can anyone tell me where to update the reply address?
I have AD synced from on-prem to Azure, then I setup a website on azurewebsites.net, then created a CNAME record from portal.mydomain.com to portal.azurewebsites.net. When I try to login using portal.mydomain.com I get:
AADSTS50011: The reply address does not match the reply addresses configured for the application.
Can anyone help? Thanks
Frank Russo

Hi Frank69,
Thanks for posting here!
It appears to me that the application is unable to find the URL you have configured on Azure or could be missing from the list. As a result the application is attempting to authenticate against AAD but failing to match the URl it wants.
I would suggest you to re-configure your AAD application on Azure and set one or more reply URLs.
Reference link:
http://www.matvelloso.com/2015/01/30/troubleshooting-common-azure-active-directory-errors/
Regards,
Sadiqh
Disclaimer: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site.
Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites; therefore, Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety,
or suitability of any software or information found there.
There are inherent dangers in the use of any software found on the Internet, and Microsoft cautions you to make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any software from the Internet.

The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly re

Ok. been working on this for the better part of a day. I am having trouble with the .net web controls. trying to create a simple portlet that populates a text box with values from a 2nd text box when a button is selected. both text boxes are in the same portlet.
without using the <httpModules> entry in the web.config file the portlet works fine, but it does pop you out of the portal.
setup: working in a Dev. environment with portal and portlets on the same box.Portal version is 5.0.2.EDK version is 5.0.2.
error:
The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.IO.FileLoadException: The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.Source Error:An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.Assembly Load Trace:The following information can be helpful to determine why the assembly 'openfoundation' could not be loaded.=== Pre-bind state information ===
LOG: DisplayName = openfoundation, Version=2.0.9.3152, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d0e882dd51ca12c5
(Fully-specified)
LOG: Appbase = file:///c:/inetpub/wwwroot/netTest
LOG: Initial PrivatePath = bin
Calling assembly : dotnetportlet, Version=3.5.0.1, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null.
===
LOG: Publisher policy file is not found.
LOG: No redirect found in host configuration file (C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\aspnet.config).
LOG: Using machine configuration file from C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\config\machine.config.
LOG: Post-policy reference: openfoundation, Version=2.0.9.3152, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d0e882dd51ca12c5
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/WINNT/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v1.1.4322/Temporary ASP.NET Files/nettest/9e6689f5/a0d2f067/openfoundation.DLL.
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/WINNT/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v1.1.4322/Temporary ASP.NET Files/nettest/9e6689f5/a0d2f067/openfoundation/openfoundation.DLL.
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///c:/inetpub/wwwroot/netTest/bin/openfoundation.DLL.
WRN: Comparing the assembly name resulted in the mismatch: Minor Version
Stack Trace:[FileLoadException: The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.]
   Plumtree.Remote.Portlet.PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(HttpRequest req, HttpResponse resp) +0
   Com.Plumtree.Remote.Transformer.Condition.GatewayedStandardCondition.UseFilter(HttpContext ctx)
   Com.Plumtree.Remote.Transformer.FilterManager.UpdateFilter(HttpContext ctx)
   Com.Plumtree.Remote.Transformer.PTTransformer.BeginRequestHandler(Object sender, EventArgs e)
   System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication+IExecutionStep.Execute() +60
   System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +87
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.573; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.947
************************************************************Is there any step by step instructions for setting up and using the .net web controls in Plumtree????
There doesn't seem to be any information in one spot as to setting up the environment to use the .Net Web Controls. I have had to piece together information from multipule threads to get this far. I.E. there was nothing in any documentation that I have read that required the installation of the VJ# lib's. (that error took me the first half of the day to resolve :-) )
Thanks for any help,
Greg************************************************************

Also, when reviewing the Plumtree_.NET_Web_Controls_InstallLog.log there were 5 nonfatal erros. These error's were:
Install File: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\edk.dll Status: ERROR Additional Notes: ERROR - java.io.FileNotFoundException: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\edk.dll (The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process)
Install File: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\jsregistry.dll Status: ERROR Additional Notes: ERROR - java.io.FileNotFoundException: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\jsregistry.dll (The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process)
Install File: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\log4net.dll Status: ERROR Additional Notes: ERROR - java.io.FileNotFoundException: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\log4net.dll (The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process)
Install File: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\openfoundation.dll Status: ERROR Additional Notes: ERROR - java.io.FileNotFoundException: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\openfoundation.dll (The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process)
Install File: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\Plumtree.WCFilter.dll Status: ERROR Additional Notes: ERROR - java.io.FileNotFoundException: E:\plumtree\ptwc\2.0\bin\assemblies\Plumtree.WCFilter.dll (The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process)
When installing the Web Control's do you need to stop any services? I didn't see anything in the install notes about doing this?

JNI generated header file does not match the class file

We have had a JNI project for many years and all has been fine. Within our libraries we have several classes that have inner enum classes.
Recently we have moved to JDK1.7. Up to now when JNI generated the methods where the signature used the inner enum class, and it was an oveloaded method, we would get something like the following as the signature:
Java_PackageName_ClassName_methodName_OuterClass_00024InnerEnum_2
And the class file result of the build would look like the following:
methodName(OuterClass$InnerEnum)
Since we have moved to JDK 1.7 the header file looks like the following:
Java_PackageName_ClassName_methodName_OuterClasss_InnerEnum_2
The class file is still the same, and because of that when we run the program we get an UnsatisfiedLinkError. I understand that this error is because the VM cannot find the implementation. So why JDK 1.7 generates a header file that does not match the class file?
Thank you in advance.

I don't have 1.6 to verify but your statements about what is generated for 1.7 for the header appear correct.
The 000024 represents the '$' and for 1.7 the inner class is still named using '$'. So for example after compiling in 1.7 the inner class file is named the following...
MyClass$InnerEnum.class
So a one to one conversion should have kept the 000024 (presuming it does in fact do it that way in 1.6.)
You might want to look at the release notes for 1.7.
If you need a solution you could add a post javah step that renames the file.

Boot screen resolution does not match the login screen on retina

Boot screen resolution does not match the login screen on MBP retinas if you've set your resolution to hi-res thus resulting a flickering at login screen appearing instead of that nice login screen animation, due to I believe screen resolution change...
is there a way to change boot screen resolution (times before login screen)???
Or do we have to wait for apple to push an EFI update for this problem?
Thanks in advance

No one having this issue?
please some one at least confirm this so I know thats not my setup spesific problem?

The declared package does not match the expected package

I was given some Java code that I need to get working and then make some improvements on, but I'm still in the process of learning Java and the IDE Eclipse as well. There is a package called MyGUI and most of the files in that package had the error "The declared package MyGui does not match the expected package MyGUI" as a result of the inconsistent case, so I changed all of the first lines "package MyGui" to "package MyGUI" and this fixed all of those problems except for one.
There is still one file where it gives this error message even though I changed the code the same way I did for the other files. I can't figure why this file is different. I saved it and I also refreshed everything, but it still gives me the error message "The declared package MyGui does not match the expected package MyGUI" although the package is clearly declared as "MyGUI".
Does anyone have an idea of why this would be? I am very new to Eclipse and Java, so I don't really know how to go about solving errors yet.

Forget the IDE until you get a handle on basic concepts like packages and classpath.
The error you're talking about comes when a .java or .class file is not in a directory that matches its declared package.
Let's say that CLASSPATH_ROOT is the only element in your classpath. If you have a class that is declared like so:
package com.foo;
class Bar {}Then, you must have CLASSPATH_ROOT/com/foo/Bar.java or CLASSPATH_ROOT/com/foo/Bar.class.
The language rules for .java files are not as strict as those for .class files, but some compilers may expect them to be the same, and it's a good idea to do so even if it's not strictly necessary, for clarity's sake.
Also, even though Windows' file system is not case sensitive--that is it considers FOO.class and foo.class the same file name--Java is. You probably can't directly rename FOO.java to Foo.java in Windows, as it will say it's the same name, so if you need to change the case, rename it to a different name, than back to Foo with the correct case.
Edited by: jverd on Mar 29, 2009 12:07 PM

Pretzel: The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the

We have got 5.0.2 Plumtree portal, EDK 5.0.2 and .Net Web Controls 2.1.
I am trying to call:
IPortletContext oPortletContext = PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Request, System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Response);
I have attached the error I am getting. Is this related to Open Foundation version? This is quite urgent because we are in the process of trying to get a demo together for grabbing Activity Rights.
Server Error in '/portlets/DOJ/JNET/pretzel.clients.doj.reentry' Application.
The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.IO.FileLoadException: The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.Source Error:An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.Assembly Load Trace:The following information can be helpful to determine why the assembly 'openfoundation' could not be loaded.=== Pre-bind state information ===
LOG: DisplayName = openfoundation, Version=2.0.9.8318, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d0e882dd51ca12c5
(Fully-specified)
LOG: Appbase = file:///E:/Data/HSTPRDAPP01/Inetpub/plumtree/portlets/DOJ/JNET/pretzel.clients.doj.reentry
LOG: Initial PrivatePath = bin
Calling assembly : dotnetportlet, Version=3.5.0.1, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null.
===
LOG: Publisher policy file is not found.
LOG: No redirect found in host configuration file (C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\aspnet.config).
LOG: Using machine configuration file from C:\WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v1.1.4322\config\machine.config.
LOG: Post-policy reference: openfoundation, Version=2.0.9.8318, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d0e882dd51ca12c5
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/WINNT/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v1.1.4322/Temporary ASP.NET Files/portlets_doj_jnet_pretzel.clients.doj.reentry/26128f6f/cfc1837a/openfoundation.DLL.
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///C:/WINNT/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v1.1.4322/Temporary ASP.NET Files/portlets_doj_jnet_pretzel.clients.doj.reentry/26128f6f/cfc1837a/openfoundation/openfoundation.DLL.
LOG: Attempting download of new URL file:///E:/Data/HSTPRDAPP01/Inetpub/plumtree/portlets/DOJ/JNET/pretzel.clients.doj.reentry/bin/openfoundation.DLL.
WRN: Comparing the assembly name resulted in the mismatch: Minor Version
Stack Trace:[FileLoadException: The located assembly's manifest definition with name 'openfoundation' does not match the assembly reference.]
   Plumtree.Remote.Portlet.PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(HttpRequest req, HttpResponse resp) +0
   pretzel.clients.doj.reentry.navigation.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in \\devnet2\inetpub\doj\reentry\development\pretzel.clients.doj.reentry\navigation.aspx.cs:22
   System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +67
   System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +35
   System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain() +750
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:1.1.4322.1031; ASP.NET Version:1.1.4322.947

I have seen this before after a upgrade of the EDK, found I had to remove the reference in the C# project to the old EDK dll and re add it to the new EDK dll.
Also noticed that you are using the System.Web.HttpContext.Current fully qualified namespace in the CreatePortletContext() call instead of the usual way of PortletContextFactory.CreatePortletContext(Request, Response) this uses the System.Web.HttpRequest.Page namespace by default.

The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP

Error Message: " The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action"
we need establish webservice link with our vendors, they are on windows platform and we are on java.
they gave us this URL:
http://mesadstage.webhop.net/MesadSCService/EBOrderService.svc?wsdl
I create a project in Netbeans, then add Web Service Client, put the URL in, after the some configuration and source code generation, i put these codes in the public void main(String[]), it always returned the error msg:
Error Message: "The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action, 'http://tempuri.org/IEBOrderService/GetData'. "
what was wrong? any thing that I din configured? or it caused by different platforms???
h2. error message (stack trace)
javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPFaultException: The SOAP action specified on the message, '', does not match the HTTP SOAP Action, http://tempuri.org/IEBOrderService/GetData'.
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.MethodMarshallerUtils.createSystemException(MethodMarshallerUtils.java:1326)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.MethodMarshallerUtils.demarshalFaultResponse(MethodMarshallerUtils.java:1052)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.marshaller.impl.alt.DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller.demarshalFaultResponse(DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller.java:659)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.getFaultResponse(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:577)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.createResponse(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:520)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.invokeSEIMethod(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:386)
at org.apache.axis2.jaxws.client.proxy.JAXWSProxyHandler.invoke(JAXWSProxyHandler.java:171)
at $Proxy11.getData(Unknown Source)
at javaapplication7.Main.a(Main.java:28)
at javaapplication7.Main.main(Main.java:43)
h2. source code:
try {
org.tempuri.EBOrderService service = new org.tempuri.EBOrderService();
org.tempuri.IEBOrderService port = service.getWSHttpBindingIEBOrderService();
java.lang.Integer value = Integer.valueOf(0);
java.lang.String result = port.getData(value);
System.out.println("Result = " + result);
} catch (Exception ex) {
System.out.println("Error = " + ex.getMessage());
ex.printStackTrace();
}

Try to rebuild the index file of the troubled folder.
Right-click the folder - Properties - Repair Folder

CreateAuthenticatedSessionToken: The signature of the request does not match the request parameters

I'm creating an app using the SODA Architecture.
I could successfully create an app and make the client to authorize it.
Result of newApplicationCreationInfo:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<response>
<status>
<code>0</code>
</status>
<wc:info xmlns:wc="urn:com.microsoft.wc.methods.response.NewApplicationCreationInfo">
<app-id>4417587e-46d1-49ee-a0fa-50dbfdcf932c</app-id>
<shared-secret>gBksYDAqcuAUXK+zyvfFW9F0sy8nchwnplJ6K7aKmAM=</shared-secret>
<app-token>AiAAANDl....A5b9fxVIlXEloouci6jGhY/A==</app-token>
</wc:info>
</response>
I'm using the app-token to build the redirect url, and I get to authorize the new app.
then, using the new child app id and the shared-secret I built the
CreateAuthenticatedSessionToken:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<wc-request:request xmlns:wc-request="urn:com.microsoft.wc.request">
<header>
<method>CreateAuthenticatedSessionToken</method>
<method-version>2</method-version>
<app-id>4417587e-46d1-49ee-a0fa-50dbfdcf932c</app-id>
<language>en</language>
<country>US</country>
<msg-time>2013-01-01T00:00:00Z</msg-time>
<msg-ttl>1800</msg-ttl>
<version>2.0.0.0</version>
</header>
<info>
<auth-info>
<app-id>4417587e-46d1-49ee-a0fa-50dbfdcf932c</app-id>
<credential>
<appserver2>
<hmacSig algName="HMACSHA256">PcW4f9krD1O43O4JGBGEkqDlpatFIUUQY9JejHji0XA=</hmacSig>
<content>
<app-id>4417587e-46d1-49ee-a0fa-50dbfdcf932c</app-id>
<hmac>HMACSHA256</hmac>
<signing-time>2013-12-17T14:19:58.623Z</signing-time>
</content>
</appserver2>
</credential>
</auth-info>
</info>
</wc-request:request>
Being hmacSig value the encryption of "<content>....</content>" using shared-secret value as private key:
hmacSig = Encodingutil.base64Encode(Crypto.generateMac('hmacSHA256', Blob.valueOf(body), Blob.valueOf(sharedSecret)))
this returns an error code 11: The signature of the request does not match the request parameters.
I'm using the following endpoint: https://platform.healthvault-ppe.com/platform/wildcat.ashx
Also the redirection url I received after authorizing the app contains the following:
https://<MY_URL>/?gws_rd=cr&ei=h5ewUuKLJa7IsASc4YHIAw I'm not using this parameters, if that helps.
Any hint will be greatly appreciated.
UPDATE: I already checked the HMAC encoding using a third party service and it returned the same as my app

I figured this out (God bless Pair Programming):
I was signing incorrectly:
On the newApplicationCreationInfo:
My Shared Secret is : gBksYDAqcuAUXK+zyvfFW9F0sy8nchwnplJ6K7aKmAM=
But BEFORE hashing the "<content>...</content>" i need to decode my secret that is:
hmacsig = calculateHMAC256(content, sharedSecret.decodeBase64())

ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested.

I am getting below mentioned error?
ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested. Reference is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
Definition is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Activation Context generation failed.
End Activation Context Generation.
How to solve this error?
=================
Begin Activation Context Generation.
Input Parameter:
Flags = 0
ProcessorArchitecture = Wow32
CultureFallBacks = en-US;en
ManifestPath = C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\MFC80.DLL
AssemblyDirectory = C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\
Application Config File =
INFO: Parsing Manifest File C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\MFC80.DLL.
INFO: Manifest Definition Identity is (null).
INFO: Reference: Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0"
INFO: Resolving reference Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture WOW64.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture Neutral.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC\8.0.50608.0__1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture Neutral.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture x86.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture Neutral.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC\8.0.50608.0__1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.DLL.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: Manifest found at C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui,language="*",processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture WOW64.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en-US.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en-US_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en-US.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for ProcessorArchitecture x86.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en-US.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en-US_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en-US.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Resolving reference for culture en.
INFO: Applying Binding Policy.
INFO: No publisher policy found.
INFO: No binding policy redirect found.
INFO: Begin assembly probing.
INFO: Did not find the assembly in WinSxS.
INFO: Attempt to probe manifest at C:\Windows\assembly\GAC_32\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui\8.0.50608.0_en_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.mui.DLL.
INFO: Did not find manifest for culture en.
INFO: End assembly probing.
INFO: Parsing Manifest File C:\Program Files (x86)\Citrix\ICA Client\Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC.MANIFEST.
INFO: Manifest Definition Identity is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Component identity found in manifest does not match the identity of the component requested. Reference is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50608.0".
Definition is Microsoft.VC80.MFCLOC,processorArchitecture="x86",publicKeyToken="1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b",type="win32",version="8.0.50727.762".
ERROR: Activation Context generation failed.
End Activation Context Generation.

Hello Xyzam,
Welcome to MSDN forum.
Based on your description, I am afraid that your issue is out of support range of VS General Question forum which mainly discusses
the usage of Visual Studio IDE such as WPF & SL designer, Visual Studio Guidance Automation Toolkit, Developer Documentation and Help System
and Visual Studio Editor.
Whether did this issue occur when you do something in Visual Studio? Which version of Visual Studio are you using? If you got this issue when you worked with a project, please tell us the type of your project, is it MFC project?
When you running this MFC project?
If you created new and simple project, whether you get this issue?
Please provide us detailed information, then we will provide you better support.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

RBPD results does not match the usage of transaction in the system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for