RDBMS Version 8.0.5.0.0  Start시 mount 상태로 있어요.

alert 로그 파일을 보면 아래와 같이 마지막 부분에 alter database mount 상태로 있습니다..
db를 mount 후 open 하고 싶습니다.
방법이 없나요...
Wed Aug 12 17:47:01 2009
Shutting down instance (abort)
License high water mark = 3
Instance terminated by USER, pid = 9937
Wed Aug 12 17:50:12 2009
Starting ORACLE instance (normal)
LICENSE_MAX_SESSION = 0
LICENSE_SESSIONS_WARNING = 0
LICENSE_MAX_USERS = 0
Starting up ORACLE RDBMS Version: 8.0.5.0.0.
System parameters with non-default values:
tracefiles_public = TRUE
processes = 150
event = 10210 trace name context forever, level 2, 10211 trace name context forever, level 2, 10235 trace name context forever, level 1, 10246 trace name context forever, level 2, 7267 trace name errorstack level 4, 3106 trace name errorstack level 4, 10076 trace name context forever, level 1
shared_pool_size = 128000000
enqueue_resources = 5000
nls_language = american
nls_territory = america
nls_sort = binary
nls_date_format = DD-MON-RR
nls_numeric_characters = .,
control_files = /d01/oradata/PRD/cntrl01.ctl
db_block_buffers = 500
db_block_size = 8192
log_buffer = 327680
log_checkpoint_interval = 10000
db_files = 200
db_file_multiblock_read_count= 32
dml_locks = 500
row_locking = always
rollback_segments = RBS01, RBS02, RBS03, RBS04, RBS05, RBS06, RBS07
sequence_cache_entries = 100
sequence_cache_hash_buckets= 89
sort_area_size = 256000
db_name = PRD
open_cursors = 255
optimizerundo_changes = TRUE
optimizer_mode = rule
utl_file_dir = /usr/tmp, /d01/app/applmgr/1103/common/TMP, /d01/app/applmgr/1103/ja/11.0.28/out
background_dump_dest = /d01/app/oracle/admin/PRD/bdump
user_dump_dest = /d01/app/oracle/admin/PRD/udump
max_dump_file_size = 10240
core_dump_dest = /d01/app/oracle/admin/PRD/cdump
aq_tm_processes = 1
PMON started with pid=2
DBW0 started with pid=3
LGWR started with pid=4
CKPT started with pid=5
SMON started with pid=6
RECO started with pid=7
QMN0 started with pid=8
Wed Aug 12 17:50:13 2009
alter database mount

장애 상황으로 open이 안되는 건지 아니면 startup mount를 통한 startup인지 구분이 필요하겠지만
만약 장애 상황이 아니라면
alter database open;
명령어로 mount 단계에서 open 단계로 넘어갈 수 있습니다.
만약 장애 상황에 따른 open 불가 상황이라면 장애를 복구하는 방향으로 접근해야 합니다.

Similar Messages

  • Jonatan R. Aug 1, 2012 5:42 PM Hello, didnt really know hwere to post this guess it more belong under like "computers" generally,    but! For a while...        (-THE LONGER VERSION) : No whait!, let me start where it all began, 2009, a december (erhh.. ii

    Hello, didnt really know hwere to post this guess it more belong under like "computers" generally, 
    but! For a while... 
        (-THE LONGER VERSION) :
    No whait!, let me start where it all began, 2009, a december (erhh.. iii think? Hwatever!) litlle me hwere nearly Totally blank to the computer world. And suddenly it stood there on the table, a shining (it was shining back there) new "hp pavillion entertainment pc" with its smell of fresh plastic mixed hwith the strong smell from the cardboardbox, remember it as if it were yesterday
    ... Since then.... I have today a good solid pc knowing! (at more advance level cmd,bott menu, recovery, blah, blah... NERD!) here at the last awhile, ive prommised to make a lot! A lot of video projects!
    (okay 2, but some big ones!) avchd multilayer 2 hours!!!! 
    So the poor hp laptop -dual core i2 4gb ram, has been begged to it knees! And simply cant handle it of course! and it have just trough time benn loaded with lots of crap, and is extremly noisy, heat, slow, anoying = unusable!
    SO hwat i need is...
        (-THE SHORTER) :
    A computer setup that will EASILY! could handle stuff like that  (avchd, multilayer, 2 hours project) -and simmilar. A total power machine! But Im tired of windows! And ugly cheap looking design! The times have changed and i change with them!
    NOW I WANT APPLE!! 
    But but but... Hwat should i get????
    1. Im NOT a billionare!
    2. I repeat: NOT a billionare!
    3. I also need portability for every day use beyond the hardcore creative editing and use
    AT LAST:
     i saw in front of me this genius plan... With a macbook pro, a tuned one, with as much of ram,cpu,gpu, and everything else as it can posibble have
    -the perfect combination of transportabillity, everydayuse and total power!
    When it gets combine with,
    A cinemadisplay
    A extra keyboard
    And a extra magic mouse
    And this power macbook pro, with screen, mouse, and keyboard i've found a really good offer at.
    MY ACTUAL QUESTION.... :
    Now it is yours turn to please! be creative! Please! Hwat does all you genius heads! think and say?
    WILL A super tuned MACBBOK PRO COMBINED WITH ACCESSORIES, AT ALL, BE ABLE TO REPLACE A STRONG MAC PRO, OR AT LEAST BE MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR REALLY HEAVY STUFF? And if yes, HOW strong actually (ram,cpu,gpu...) will it need to have to be "more than enough"?
    If no, what would all of  you then suggest that is perfect in relation to everything?
    PLEASE ANSWER!!

    Jonatan R. wrote:
    WILL A super tuned MACBBOK PRO COMBINED WITH ACCESSORIES, AT ALL, BE ABLE TO REPLACE A STRONG MAC PRO,
    No,
    the MacPro is the muscle machine and not constrained by power or cooling limitations like the MacBoo Pro is.
    OR AT LEAST BE MORE THAN ENOUGH FOR REALLY HEAVY STUFF?
    If you press the MacBook Pro like a desktop machine, it will blow fans like a hurricane but will do the job eventually.
    The longer you blow fans on a laptop, the sooner it clogs up with crippling dust and shortens the life of the machine.
    You'll need the top end 15" or better, not the 13" as it has no dedicated graphics, only CPU graphics.
    Preferably if you just now getting into video, you should be considering Avid on a Windows 7 tower, it's because Apple has been ignoring the MacPro for hardware updates to improve it and it seems like they don't want to carry it anymore. Also the last Final Cut Pro version had Hollywood up in arms as Apple removed a lot of required abilities to make it more "consumer friendly" which upset the Pro market who likes control.
    Apple is focusing on the consumer computing market and getting away from the "Pro" market which needs the heavier hardware to handle video needs. They stopped selling the X-RAID and the X-Server, so Apple really isn't a "computer" company any longer.
    Sure you can use a MacBook Pro and a external monitor for doing home movies and such occasionally, but if your into serious production you need to consdier other options now.
    There is nothing wrong in getting a MacBook Air and a Windows 7 professional video tower too.

  • Every time I update LR to a new version I seem to need a patch to make it work..... once again here I am SOS! I've just update LR to the 5.7 version and It wont let me start it: The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b).

    Every time I update LR to a new version I seem to need a patch to make it work..... once again here I am SOS! I've just update LR to the 5.7 version and It wont let me start it: The application was unable to start correctly (0xc000007b).

    Your system is missing a couple DLLs that LR needs, but the fix at Adobe is to copy them to the LR folder which gets replaced for each install, so you have to redo it after each LR install.  It would be worth documenting the process and saving the DLLs so you don’t have to ask about it each time:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/error-unable-start-correctly-0xc00007b.html
    You might also use the AIO210 program to add them as detailed in this YouTube video—maybe this is a more permanent fix, but since the files are from media-fire be very careful about what you do so as not to install a virus on your computer. 
    I’d scan the downloaded ZIP you download with whatever virus and internet security software you have and don’t be fooled by extraneous popups you might see during the download process.  I was able to download the aio210.zip after authorizing one Captcha window and closed at least one bogus popup trying to get me to install other software.  I also scanned the downloaded zip with two virus scanners and both said it was clean.  Here is the YouTube video, where the link to the ZIP to download is in the description once you expand it:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vlT0N2CX50g

  • What can I do when  in Photoshop Elements (version 11) the organizer does not start up??

    !@@

    Yes, thanks a lot. I understand now.
    I now am able to open the old catalog again!! I tried now several times with the new shortcut.
    Thank you very much indeed for ALL YOUR EFFORT and patients with me.
    You suggest now I should click on the repair button. When I do so, the catalog will be overwritten, or I can choose not to overwrite and than the catalog will be twice as big. So I decided not to click on the repair button. When I see afterwards that some functions do not work anymore, I allways can use the repair button. As far as I can see now nothing is lost.. )
    As far as I understood it is only possible to repair with a backup. Happily I made that allways, but I am afraid to use it, for the reason above.
    When I have more time to spare, I will look for all the foto's from the apps of my cellphone and delete them.
    Now I can finish my fotowork, what I had started before, and make Photoshop Elements again the main fotoprogram on my desktop.
    Thank you again! Trees
    Van: Little_Pale_Face 
    Verzonden: woensdag 1 april 2015 21:53
    Aan: Trees kaizer
    Onderwerp:  What can I do when  in Photoshop Elements (version 11) the organizer does not start up??
    What can I do when  in Photoshop Elements (version 11) the organizer does not start up??
    created by Little_Pale_Face <https://forums.adobe.com/people/Little_Pale_Face>  in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion <https://forums.adobe.com/message/7396555#7396555>

  • Since july 2 I have Acrobat Pro (the paid version). But every time I start the program I get the screen with: this is a trial version. You have X days left, etc. I find that quite annoying.

    Since july 2 I have Acrobat Pro (the paid version). But every time I start the program I get the screen with: this is a trial version. You have X days left, etc. I find that quite annoying.

    This is not just annoying, it is wrong, because at the end of the trial it will stop completely. You must resolve it before then.
    So, did you do anything to license the trial version? It needs to be told that you have purchased, or it will stop working at the end of the trial.

  • Optimizer bug in RDBMS versions 9.2.0.7.0 and 9.2.0.8.0

    This listing below demonstrates a bug in the Oracle optimizer that causes incorrect results to be returned after a table is analyzed. Rule based optimizer gives correct results.
    Under cost-based optimization the predicate includes a condition from a check constraint on a nullable field. When the value of this field is NULL the record is excluded from the results even though that record does not violate the check constraint.
    I have verified that this bug exists on both RDBMS versions 9.2.0.7.0 and 9.2.0.8.0.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>DROP TABLE test1;
    Table dropped.
    ORA92080>DROP TABLE test2;
    Table dropped.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>CREATE TABLE test1
    2 ( id     NUMBER NOT NULL
    3 , date1     DATE NOT NULL
    4 , date2     DATE
    5 );
    Table created.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>ALTER TABLE test1
    2 ADD ( CONSTRAINT test1_chk_date1
    3      CHECK ( date1 > TO_DATE( '01-JAN-1960', 'DD-MON-YYYY' ) )
    4      );
    Table altered.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>ALTER TABLE test1
    2 ADD ( CONSTRAINT test1_chk_date2
    3      CHECK ( date2 >= date1 )
    4      );
    Table altered.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>/* date2 is NULL */
    ORA92080>INSERT INTO test1 VALUES ( 1, TO_DATE('16-JUN-2005 11:30:01', 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS'), NULL );
    1 row created.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>/* date2 is filled in */
    ORA92080>INSERT INTO test1 VALUES ( 2
    2                     , TO_DATE('16-JUN-2005 11:30:01', 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
    3                     , TO_DATE('16-JUN-2005 11:40:01', 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
    4                );
    1 row created.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>CREATE TABLE test2 AS
    2 SELECT * FROM test1
    3 WHERE 1=2;
    Table created.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT = 'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS';
    Session altered.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>SELECT * FROM test1;
    ID DATE1 DATE2
    1 16-JUN-2005 11:30:01
    2 16-JUN-2005 11:30:01 16-JUN-2005 11:40:01
    2 rows selected.
    ORA92080>SELECT * FROM test2;
    no rows selected
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>/*
    DOC>| Since no statistics were gathered, rule-based optimizer will be used.
    DOC>| The correct count of two is returned.
    DOC>*/
    ORA92080>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    2 WHERE EXISTS
    3      ( SELECT 'X'
    4      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    5                FROM test1
    6           MINUS
    7           SELECT id, date1
    8                FROM test2
    9           ) i
    10      WHERE i.id = t.id
    11           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    12      );
    COUNT(*)
    2
    1 row selected.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    2 SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    3 WHERE EXISTS
    4      ( SELECT 'X'
    5      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    6                FROM test1
    7           MINUS
    8           SELECT id, date1
    9                FROM test2
    10           ) i
    11      WHERE i.id = t.id
    12           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    13      );
    Explained.
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | | | |
    |* 2 | FILTER | | | | |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST1 | | | |
    | 4 | VIEW | | | | |
    | 5 | MINUS | | | | |
    | 6 | SORT UNIQUE | | | | |
    |* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST1 | | | |
    | 8 | SORT UNIQUE | | | | |
    |* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST2 | | | |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - filter( EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM ( (SELECT "TEST1"."ID"
    "ID","TEST1"."DATE1" "DATE1" FROM "TEST1" "TEST1" WHERE
    "TEST1"."DATE1"=:B1 AND "TEST1"."ID"=:B2)MINUS (SELECT "TEST2"."ID"
    "ID","TEST2"."DATE1" "DATE1" FROM "TEST2" "TEST2" WHERE
    "TEST2"."DATE1"=:B3 AND "TEST2"."ID"=:B4)) "I"))
    7 - filter("TEST1"."DATE1"=:B1 AND "TEST1"."ID"=:B2)
    9 - filter("TEST2"."DATE1"=:B1 AND "TEST2"."ID"=:B2)
    Note: rule based optimization
    28 rows selected.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>BEGIN
    2 DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS
    3      ( ownname     => USER,
    4      tabname     => 'TEST2',
    5      estimate_percent => DBMS_STATS.AUTO_SAMPLE_SIZE,
    6      cascade     => TRUE
    7      );
    8 END;
    9 /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>/*
    DOC>| This is the identical query as above. With statistics gathered, the
    DOC>| cost-based optimizer is used. An incorrect count of 1 is returned.
    DOC>*/
    ORA92080>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    2 WHERE EXISTS
    3      ( SELECT 'X'
    4      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    5                FROM test1
    6           MINUS
    7           SELECT id, date1
    8                FROM test2
    9           ) i
    10      WHERE i.id = t.id
    11           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    12      );
    COUNT(*)
    1
    1 row selected.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>/* Using rule-based optimizer, the result is correct. */
    ORA92080>SELECT /*+ RULE */ COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    2 WHERE EXISTS
    3      ( SELECT 'X'
    4      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    5                FROM test1
    6           MINUS
    7           SELECT id, date1
    8                FROM test2
    9           ) i
    10      WHERE i.id = t.id
    11           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    12      );
    COUNT(*)
    2
    1 row selected.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    2 SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    3 WHERE EXISTS
    4      ( SELECT 'X'
    5      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    6                FROM test1
    7           MINUS
    8           SELECT id, date1
    9                FROM test2
    10           ) i
    11      WHERE i.id = t.id
    12           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    13      );
    Explained.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>SET ECHO OFF
    Wrote file reset.sql
    Session altered.
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 44 | 11 |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 44 | |
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 44 | 11 |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST1 | 82 | 1804 | 2 |
    | 4 | VIEW | | 1 | 22 | 8 |
    | 5 | MINUS | | | | |
    | 6 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 31 | |
    |* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST1 | 1 | 31 | 2 |
    | 8 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 22 | |
    |* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST2 | 1 | 22 | 2 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - access("I"."ID"="T"."ID" AND "I"."DATE1"="T"."DATE1")
    7 - filter("TEST1"."DATE1">TO_DATE(' 1960-01-01 00:00:00',
    'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "TEST1"."DATE2">TO_DATE(' 1960-01-01
    00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
    9 - filter("TEST2"."DATE1">TO_DATE(' 1960-01-01 00:00:00',
    'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
    Note: cpu costing is off
    27 rows selected.
    ORA92080>/*
    DOC>| Workaround: change the check constraint on the test1 table that is causing the problem.
    DOC>*/
    ORA92080>ALTER TABLE test1
    2 DROP CONSTRAINT test1_chk_date2;
    Table altered.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>ALTER TABLE test1
    2 ADD ( CONSTRAINT test1_chk_date2
    3      CHECK ( date2 >= date1 OR date2 IS NULL )
    4      EXCEPTIONS INTO exceptions
    5      );
    Table altered.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    2 WHERE EXISTS
    3      ( SELECT 'X'
    4      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    5                FROM test1
    6           MINUS
    7           SELECT id, date1
    8                FROM test2
    9           ) i
    10      WHERE i.id = t.id
    11           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    12      );
    COUNT(*)
    2
    1 row selected.
    ORA92080>
    ORA92080>EXPLAIN PLAN FOR
    2 SELECT COUNT(*) FROM test1 t
    3 WHERE EXISTS
    4      ( SELECT 'X'
    5      FROM ( SELECT id, date1
    6                FROM test1
    7           MINUS
    8           SELECT id, date1
    9                FROM test2
    10           ) i
    11      WHERE i.id = t.id
    12           AND i.date1 = t.date1
    13      );
    Explained.
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 44 | 11 |
    | 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 44 | |
    |* 2 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 44 | 11 |
    | 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST1 | 409 | 8998 | 2 |
    | 4 | VIEW | | 20 | 440 | 8 |
    | 5 | MINUS | | | | |
    | 6 | SORT UNIQUE | | 20 | 440 | |
    |* 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST1 | 20 | 440 | 2 |
    | 8 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 22 | |
    |* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST2 | 1 | 22 | 2 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    2 - access("I"."ID"="T"."ID" AND "I"."DATE1"="T"."DATE1")
    7 - filter("TEST1"."DATE1">TO_DATE(' 1960-01-01 00:00:00',
    'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
    9 - filter("TEST2"."DATE1">TO_DATE(' 1960-01-01 00:00:00',
    'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
    Note: cpu costing is off
    26 rows selected.
    ORA92080>

    Justin,
    Thanks for the reply. I have sent this test case to my DBA who may submit it to Metalink.
    Since I have found and implemented a workaround, I can wait for the next service release. I just thought that this might be of interest to other Oracle users.
    My work-around (buried near the end of my original post) was to modify all check constraints that fit the pattern:
    ( not_nullable_column condition IS TRUE )
    AND ( nullable_column condition IS TRUE )
    To:
    ( not_null_column condition IS TRUE )
    AND ( nullable_column condition IS TRUE OR nullable_column IS NULL )
    Redefining a check constraint in this way prevents it from being used in the optimizer's predicate.
    If someone at Oracle Support wanted to submit code that identifies such potential problem constraints in the data dictionary, that would be great too.
    - Doug

  • My iMac Version 10.6.8 has problems starting up. I often get a white screen without the apple icon.

    My iMac Version 10.6.8 has problems starting up. I often get a white screen without the apple icon. Then I must turn the computer off and restart. Restarting will usually bring up the Apple icon and the start screen. What could be causing this? And how can I resolve this issue. My Mac is still under warranty, I've had it just 7 months.

    Reset the NVRAM/PRAM and Reset the SMC.

  • I downloaded the trial version of creative cloud but cannot start photoshop?

    I downloaded the trial version of creative cloud but cannot start photoshop?
    How can I start the program, cannot find any Ps icon to click on??
    thank you

    Without proper system info and other technical details nobody can say anything.
    Mylenium

  • Installed the new Lightroom 5 CC on a Mac running the OX X Yosemite version 10.10.3 (14D136) Lightroom starts to load but within a 1/2 sec it closes. Is there a fix?

    Installed the new Lightroom 5 CC on a Mac running the OX X Yosemite version 10.10.3 (14D136) Lightroom starts to load but within a 1/2 sec it closes. Is there a fix?

    I had the same problem earlier today. Sign out of your account for CC in the Preferences panel, close the CC toolbar app. Then sign back in, and the download process might begin in earnest for you. Took me SIX HOURS to download this pig, and now it crashes continually. This software is not ready for release based on today's experience. Hopefully you will at least be able to get to the level of frustration I have arrived at, beyond the level of frustration you are currently stuck at trying to get it to work.I am on the same OS. Too bad Apple abandoned a pro level competitor to LR. Hopefully in the near future they will update Photos so that it competes well with LR.

  • I've just bought Office 365 Personal, without realising there is a University version. I'm due to start University in two weeks, is there any way I can convert my account to the University version? Or uninstall my current version and replace it?

    I've just bought Office 365 Personal, without realising there is a University version. I'm due to start University in two weeks, is there any way I can convert my account to the University version? Or uninstall my current version and replace it?

    Contact Microsoft and ask them.  These forums are for troubleshooting technical issues with Apple products and not related to Office or your question in any way.

  • I updated iTunes to 10.4 version and now it doesn't start and sen a messages "iTunes has detected an error and must be closed". Someone have the same problem and how can we repair our installation insted of change the windows XP installation? Best regard

    I updated iTunes to 10.4 version and now it doesn't start and send a messages "iTunes has detected an error and must be closed". Someone have the same problem and how can we repair our installation insted of change the windows XP installation? Best regards

    Only way to get iMac starting again was to re-install 10.4.4 from DVD, and then update it into 10.4.6. For a while it worked perfectly, just as before.
    Then I tried to print to CD with my EPSON Stylus Photo 950 from Adobe Photoshop Elements (2.0). It didn't print anything, but printer started flashing all lights. The print job was not performed, so I did remove it from the Printer Utility. After that the iMac started "ticking" again, same noise than before, after 10.4.7 installation. I did re-boot iMac. It never started, it does stuck on gray screen (gray block running clockwise). HW test from DVD didn't find any problems (extended search looping 3 times). But Disk Utility found hard drive to have inaccurate node structure, it could not fix it.
    Apple support recommended to use DiskWarrior. However, it does not support (yet) Intel Macs. I haven't got TechTool Pro 4.5.1 anywhere. iMac does start on to FireWire mode (T at boot), but I cannot see the disk from 10.2.8 iMac.
    So, obvisously the problem is not 10.4.7. I believe it to be ESPON printer driver compatibility on Mac OSX. This does not suprise me, EPSON printers *****, I shall never purchase one again. However, disk catalog structure should not get messed by one faulty printer driver!

  • Is XML DB versions tied to RDBMS versions?

    Hi,
    Can new functionality of XML DB be deployed to older versions of a database? I currently have RDBMS version of 92060 (yes, old, and yes it's Oracle EBS)
    Is it possible to install 10g XML DB functionality into this database? without first upgrading to 10g?
    Regards,
    Alex

    9.2.0.6.0 can provide 9.2.0.6.0 XML DB functionality. If XML DB is not enabled it can be enabled by running catqm. However since XML DB functionality is native to the database and tightly integrated with the kernel you cannot install functionality that was introduced in a later release of the database.

  • Start mount 2nd standby RAC instance got controlfile header error

    start mount

    I created the standby controlfile from the primary database, scp the controlfile to both standby nodes, and modified init file to include those controlfiles.I would recreate the control file and scp it again. But instead of changing your spfile, rename the copies to match your spfile.
    If you have to recreate the spfile from a pfile copy.
    OERR: ORA 203 using the wrong control files [ID 18288.1]
    ALTER DATABASE CREATE STANDBY CONTROLFILE AS '/u01/app/11.2.0/standbycontrolfilename.ctl' REUSE;Cooper

  • Can I install the latest version of FF on Windows 7 Starter

    Can I upgrade version 6.0.2 to the current version - 22 I believe, on a netbook running Win 7 starter? I have an Atom N450 processor @1.66 gHz and 2 MB RAM with about 40 GB left on my HD. Can I do the upgrade with that configuration? Will it be faster than the version I have now?
    Thanks!

    No issue - I just wanted to be sure I could do it before I even tried. Wondered if my system was going to be up to handling the newest FF. But no - no install issue - yet!

  • Problem with reader version 11.0.2 when it starts up and I open a file, All hangs for 30sec

    I am using windows 7 on a 64bit laptop.
    When I open a file the sytem hangs for over 30sec saying 'program not responding' the wakens up and works fine till I open another file?

    Thanks for your feedback. I have now tried that but does not appear to change the situation noticeably.
    I have tried raising priority using a program for managing the 2 memory cores and this appears to improve
    things considerably as one might expect but probably only masks the basic problem.
    I am assuming that I have added the reader_sl.exe program file to the start-up sequence, since this is
    not as straightforward with windows 7 as it was with previous versions.

Maybe you are looking for