RDS 2008 R2 / Load Balancing, My 1st Setup. Help.

I currently have a 2008 R2 RDS server setup with around 100 people accessing, unfortunately we're starting to see 100% CPU spikes which are lasting for long periods of time making the whole RD experience painful for the end users.  I've pinpointed the
extra CPU usage to a specific program developed internally making changes to this program is not an option.
My solution is to introduce a 2nd RDS server and load balance the users between them.  My original thought was to setup a Session Broker (VM) to handle the initial connection and then that would load balance between the two physical servers.
Reading a bit more into it this is not looking like the way to go.  My best route would be to setup NLB on the two Sessions Hosts as the front end which are then connected to the Session Broker (VM).  This way after the initial connection the Sessions
Hosts should check with the Session Broker for existing connections before deciding which physical server the end users end up on.
Am I at least heading in the right direction with this setup or should I do it another way?  I also need to setup Web Access , can this be loaded on the Session Broker or do I need to do it on the physical Session Hosts and mirror the setup between
the two?  And the same for the RD Gateway or can I do this on the Session Broker as well?
Thanks for any advice given.

Hi,
Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
As you have commented that you are planning to load balance the RDSH server with RDCB, you can do the required steps for your environment. For this you need to check the following steps.
- Install the RD Connection Broker role service on the server that you want to use to track user sessions for a farm.
- Add the RD Session Host servers in the farm to the Session Broker Computers local group on the RD Connection Broker server.
- Configure the RD Session Host servers in the farm to join a farm in RD Connection Broker, and to participate in RD Connection Broker Load Balancing.
- Configure DNS round robin entries for RD Session Host servers in the farm.
More information:
Checklist: Create a Load-Balanced RD Session Host Server Farm by Using RD Connection Broker
For more information, you can go through following links.
1. Remote Desktop Server farms explained (Part 1)
2. Building a 2008 R2 RDS Load Balanced Farm with RD Connection Broker
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki

Similar Messages

  • Bind Load balancing problem..expert help required

    Hi there.
    My RV042 has 2 WAN connections. One is connected to a Public Internet (WAN1) and the DMZ/Internet to my VPN router (WAN2)
    Behind the VPN router connected t my WAN2 is  the finance servers at network 10.36.88.0
    Both users local and those who connects using PPTP VPN clients can access resources in the LAN
    My problem is that due the round robin of load balancing sometimes they cannot reach the finance server
    I tried playing bind the HTTP port and creating some rules with no luck
    We want our users to use the WAN1 for all the web pages except those behind the VPN
    Is there a way i can make that if my users access my finance server they go trough the WAN2?
    Could you please provide me some guidance? (Rules, binds. etc)
    in thi case woul be
    An access rule or bind that all the WEB traffic for 10.36.88.0 flows to WAN2.

    If you type "show real" you will probably see the column for "Data In" rising. This column is all the way on the right side of the display. This indicates that the server has received requests that it has not responded to.
    By default, the LD does not use the Data value to fail a server. So by default, the data threshold for all the real servers is "0". If you set it to a non-zero number, the LD will start to use it.
    http://www/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/localdir/ldv42/421guide/42ch05.htm#xtocid856528
    localdirector(config)# data 192.168.1.1:0:0:tcp 30
    Hope this helps,
    Steve Hall
    Cisco TAC

  • Load Balancing Microsoft RDS server

    Hi there, we have two servers hosting remote desktop service roles, is there any way to setup load balancing on these two? 
    Say setup a pointer "xxx.rdsfarm.com"? The pointer points to two servers with round robin? We have third party LB doing load-balance work for Citrix Xenapp. 
    Thanks
    Regards
    Ying Liu
    Ying Liu MCSE, CCNAV

    Hi Ying,
    Thank you for your posting in Windows Server Forum.
    Can you please let me know the OS Version of RDS Server?
    Yeah, you can load balance the two RDS Server and can combine with RDCB server for setting up RDS load balancing environment. Please check below article for information.
    1.  Remote Desktop Server farms explained (Part 1)
    2.  2012 R2 Load-Balanced RDS farm
    To load balance sessions in an RD Session Host server farm, you can use the RD Connection Broker Load Balancing feature together with Domain Name System (DNS) round robin. To configure DNS, you must create a DNS host resource record for each RD Session Host
    server in the farm that maps the RD Session Host server’s IP address to the RD Session Host server farm name in DNS.
    Checklist: Create a Load-Balanced RD Session Host Server Farm by Using RD Connection Broker
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks,
    Dharmesh

  • Access Manager 6 2005Q1 naming service behind load balancer

    Access Manager is running on box A & box B using the Sun Web Server as its front end web server. Box A & B both have a complete install of Sun Web Server, Access Manager, and Directory Server. The Directory servers are set up to replicate changes between each other. Our Policy Agents are running on box C & box D under the Apache web servers.
    Users will access applications on box C/D via https. The policy agents on box C/D should redirect the user to box A/B (via a load balancer VIP)for authentication. The redirect will be https. Once authenticated the user should be redirected back to box C/D.
    All subsequent communications between the Agents on box C/D to AM on box A/B (via load balancer VIP) are http.
    The load balancer VIP is setup in active/failover mode so all requests go to one server. We implemented it this way because our load balancers do not support SSL with cookies.
    The data returned to the agent from a call to the naming service contains the host name of our AM hosts instead of the load balancer VIP. Subsequent calls from the agent to AM bypass the load balancer and go directly to one of the AM hosts.
    We are looking to upgrade our load balancers to a version that supports cookies with ssl in order to take advantage of the second AM host.
    How do we configure AM so the values returned by the naming service contain the load balancer VIP instead of the actual AM host names?

    Bernhard,
    We have upgraded our Web PA to version 2.1-09. One of your previous replies stated the com.iplanet.am.naming.ignoreNamingservice property was not availalbe in the PA agent properties but only in the Java SKD. Indeed we do not see such a key in the new Web PA AMAgent.properties.
    Can you please explain how to configure the AMAgent.properties and/or the Access Manager server (or properties) so that subsequent calls to the services (returned by the call to the naming service) get directed thru the load balancer? Below are the setting in our AMAgent and AMConfig properties files
    AMAgent.properties
    com.sun.am.namingURL = https://lb-mydomain.com:443/amserver/namingservice
    com.sun.am.policy.am.loginURL = https://lb-mydomain.com:443/amserver/UI/Login
    AMConfig.properties
    com.iplanet.am.server.protocol=https
    com.iplanet.am.server.host=am.mydomain.com
    com.iplanet.am.server.port=443
    com.iplanet.am.console.protocol=https
    com.iplanet.am.console.host=lb-mydomain.com
    com.iplanet.am.console.port=443
    com.iplanet.am.profile.host=lb-mydomain.com
    com.iplanet.am.profile.port=443
    com.iplanet.am.naming.url=https://lb-mydomain.com:443/amserver/namingservice
    com.iplanet.am.notification.url=https://lb-mydomain.com:443/amserver/notifica
    tionservice
    If we set com.iplanet.am.server.host=lb-mydomain.com we get an exception when trying to start the AM web container. I don't know if this may be partof our issue or not. Please comment.
    Thanks,
    Craig

  • DNS load balancing for Enterprise serevrs

    Hi All
    In my test Lync 2010 Enterprise environments, recently i have implemented the DNS load balancing with webservices
    My environment is two lync 2010 ent servers , 1 SQL server, 1 Monitoring + Archive server (Same Box)
    The below steps was performed from me for DNS load balancing.
    PLEASE NOTE: NO HARDWARE LOAD BALANCING IN MY SETUP
    Create a Host record for the Pool name with respective front end servers
    Pool name : Pool2.doitnow.com with 2 lync 2010 enterprise servers named lyncfe01n.doitnow.com (192.168.1.5) and lyncfe02.doitnow.com (192.168.1.6)
    Two host A records  in DNS as POOl2 with IP of 192.168.15 and 192.168.1.6
    1. From the Lync Server 2010 program group, open Topology Builder.
    2. From the console tree, expand the Enterprise Edition Front End pools node.
    3. Right-click the pool, click Edit Properties, and then click
    Web Services.
    4. Below Internal web services, select the Override FQDN check box.
    5. Type the pool FQDN that resolves to the physical IP addresses of the servers in the pool. in
    (my case it is Pool2.doitnow.com )
    6. Below External web services, type the external pool FQDN that resolves to the virtual IP addresses of the pool, and then click
    OK. ((my case it is Pool2.doitnow.com ) - is that REQUIRED ?
    7. From the console tree, select Lync Server 2010 , and then in the
    Actions pane, click Publish Topology.
    IS THERE ANY THING TO BE DONE APART fROM ABOVE POINTS
    Now
    what i did is. in lyncfe01n.doitnow.com - i have disabled the network card and try to login lync 2010 client , but not succeesfull
    my assumption is,  it should work via lyncfe02.doitnow.com, since load balanace in DNS is in  already in place
    do i need to open  / firewall  rule to be creany port in second lync server
    here is the below seqeunce of event viwer from lync
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:34:31 PM
    Event ID:      32108
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Pool Manager changed state of Registrar with FQDN: lyncfe02.doitnow.com to Inactive.
    ======
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:35:01 PM
    Event ID:      32109
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Pool Manager changed state of Registrar with FQDN: lyncfe02.doitnow.com to Active
    ====
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS Routing Data Sync Agent
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:50:58 PM
    Event ID:      48003
    Task Category: (1058)
    Level:         Information
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    The Routing Data Sync Agent has initiated a sync cycle with: [pool2.doitnow.com]
    =====
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:21 PM
    Event ID:      32108
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Pool Manager changed state of Registrar with FQDN: lyncfe02.doitnow.com to Inactive.
    ===============
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS File Transfer Agent Service
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:45 PM
    Event ID:      1008
    Task Category: (1121)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Failed to read Central Management database information from AD connection point. Microsoft Lync Server 2010, File Transfer Agent will continuously attempt to retrieve this information.
    While this condition persists, configuration changes will not be delivered to replica machines.
    Exception:
    Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.ADTransientException: Active Directory error "-2147016646" occurred while searching for domain controllers in domain "doitnow.com": "The server is not operational.
    Name: "doitnow.com"
    " ---> System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryServerDownException: The server is not operational.
    Name: "doitnow.com"
     ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x8007203A): The server is not operational.
       at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.Bind(Boolean throwIfFail)
       at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.Bind()
       at System.DirectoryServices.DirectoryEntry.get_AdsObject()
       at System.DirectoryServices.PropertyValueCollection.PopulateList()
       at System.DirectoryServices.PropertyValueCollection..ctor(DirectoryEntry entry, String propertyName)
       at System.DirectoryServices.PropertyCollection.get_Item(String propertyName)
       at System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.PropertyManager.GetPropertyValue(DirectoryContext context, DirectoryEntry directoryEntry, String propertyName)
       --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
       at System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.PropertyManager.GetPropertyValue(DirectoryContext context, DirectoryEntry directoryEntry, String propertyName)
       at System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.Domain.GetDomain(DirectoryContext context)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.GetDCForDomain(String fqdn, NetworkCredential networkCredential)
       --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.GetDCForDomain(String fqdn, NetworkCredential networkCredential)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.DiscoverDC()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.ReportDownServer(String serverName, ADServerRole role)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.ADConnection.MarkDown(LdapError ldapError, String message)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.ADConnection.AnalyzeDirectoryError(DirectoryException de)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.AnalyzeDirectoryError(ADConnection connection, DirectoryRequest request, DirectoryException de, Int32 totalRetries, Int32 retriesOnServer)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find(ADObjectId rootId, String optionalBaseDN, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties, CreateObjectDelegate objectCreator, CreateObjectsDelegate
    arrayCreator, Boolean includeDeletedObjects)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find(ADObjectId rootId, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties, CreateObjectDelegate objectCtor, CreateObjectsDelegate arrayCtor)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find[TResult](ADObjectId rootId, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.GetTopologySetting()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.GetBackEndServer()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Xds.Replication.Common.Utils.TryGetConnectionPointFromAD(String& sqlStorePath, Exception& exception)
    Cause: Possible issues with configuration or AD access.
    Resolution:
    Ensure that activation is completed and AD is accessible from this machine.
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Xds.Replication.Common.Utils.TryGetConnectionPointFromAD(String&amp; sqlStorePath, Exception&amp; exception)</Data>
     ====================
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS Master Replicator Agent Service
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:45 PM
    Event ID:      2014
    Task Category: (2122)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Failed to read Central Management database information from AD connection point. Microsoft Lync Server 2010, Master Replicator Agent will continuously attempt to retrieve this information.
    While this condition persists, configuration changes will not be delivered to replica machines.
    Exception:
    System.ApplicationException: Domain "doitnow.com" cannot be contacted or does not exist. ---> System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.ActiveDirectoryObjectNotFoundException: The specified domain does not exist or cannot be contacted.
       at System.DirectoryServices.ActiveDirectory.Domain.GetDomain(DirectoryContext context)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.GetDCForDomain(String fqdn, NetworkCredential networkCredential)
       --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.GetDCForDomain(String fqdn, NetworkCredential networkCredential)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.DiscoverDC()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.DirectoryServicesTopologyProvider.ReportDownServer(String serverName, ADServerRole role)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.ADConnection.MarkDown(LdapError ldapError, String message)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Connection.ADConnection.AnalyzeDirectoryError(DirectoryException de)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.AnalyzeDirectoryError(ADConnection connection, DirectoryRequest request, DirectoryException de, Int32 totalRetries, Int32 retriesOnServer)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find(ADObjectId rootId, String optionalBaseDN, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties, CreateObjectDelegate objectCreator, CreateObjectsDelegate
    arrayCreator, Boolean includeDeletedObjects)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find(ADObjectId rootId, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties, CreateObjectDelegate objectCtor, CreateObjectsDelegate arrayCtor)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.Find[TResult](ADObjectId rootId, QueryScope scope, QueryFilter filter, SortBy sortBy, Int32 maxResults, IEnumerable`1 properties)
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.GetTopologySetting()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Management.ADConnect.Session.ADSession.GetBackEndServer()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Xds.Replication.Common.Utils.TryGetConnectionPointFromAD(String& sqlStorePath, Exception& exception)
    Cause: Possible issues with configuration or AD access.
    Resolution:
    Ensure that activation is completed and AD is accessible from this machine.
    ===============
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS Inbound Routing
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:46 PM
    Event ID:      45005
    Task Category: (1037)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Unexpected exception occurred in the Inbound Routing Application.
    ======================================
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:53 PM
    Event ID:      30975
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Encountered a connection failure while executing a request against the back-end.
    Back-end: sql.doitnow.com\rtc
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:53 PM
    Event ID:      32134
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Failed to connect to back-end database.  Lync Server will continuously attempt to reconnect to the back-end.  While this condition persists, incoming messages will receive error responses.
    Back-end Server: sql.doitnow.com\rtc   Database: rtc  Connection string of:
    driver={SQL Server Native Client 10.0};Trusted_Connection=yes;AutoTranslate=no;server=sql.doitnow.com\rtc;database=rtc;
    Cause: Possible issues with back-end database.
    Resolution:
    Ensure the back-end is functioning correctly.
    =================
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:53 PM
    Event ID:      32112
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Pas with FQDN: Pool2.doitnow.com has been detected to be down.
    =================
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Services
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:56:54 PM
    Event ID:      32098
    Task Category: (1006)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Failed processing conference status requests. This error might delay the freeing up of PSTN meeting ids in conference directories homed on this pool.
    Error code: 0x800407D0
    Cause: Possible issues with back-end or Lync Server health.
    Resolution:
    Ensure the Lync Server service is healthy.
    ===========
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS User Replicator
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:58:33 PM
    Event ID:      30022
    Task Category: (1009)
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    The connection to domain controller DC01.doitnow.com appears to have been terminated.  The domain controller could have gone down. User Replicator will attempt to reconnect to an available domain controller for this domain.
    =====
    Log Name:      Lync Server
    Source:        LS File Transfer Agent Service
    Date:          1/14/2014 3:58:43 PM
    Event ID:      1035
    Task Category: (1121)
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Computer:      lyncfe01n.doitnow.com
    Description:
    Failed to register with back-end database. Microsoft Lync Server 2010, File Transfer Agent will continuously attempt to reconnect to the back-end.  While this condition persists, no replication will be done.
    The Connection string: Data Source         = sql.doitnow.com\rtc;
                    Database            = xds;
                    Max Pool Size       = 5;
                    Connection Timeout  = 60;
                    Connection Reset    = false;
                    Enlist              = false;
                    Integrated Security = true;
                    Pooling             = true;
    Exception: [-1] Could not connect to SQL server : [Exception=System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that
    the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(ServerInfo serverInfo, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity, SqlConnection owningObject)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.AttemptOneLogin(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, SqlConnection owningObject)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginNoFailover(String host, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Int64 timerStart)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
       at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
       at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
       at Microsoft.Rtc.Common.Data.DBCore.PerformSprocContextExecution(SprocContext sprocContext)]
    Cause: Possible issues with back-end database.
    Resolution:
    Ensure the back-end is functioning correctly.
    =================

    Thanks Andrew.
    may be i missed to create SRV records for the second FE server - Let me check this point and come back -- is it mandatory to create the SRV records for second FE server?
     Are the clients using "Automatic Configuration"? Yes. 
    so web service need a hardware load balancer right?

  • Load Balance Configuration for OCS 10g

    Hi guys,
    A few question on the load balancer requirement and setup for a OCS 10g cluster.
    1. Can Pound be used as the load balancer for the OCS cluster. (pound is an application for load balancer and reverse proxy).
    2. Basically the load balancer will have two network interface, the first nic is connected to the
    user network, and the second interface is connected at the backend network where the ocs cluster is located. My question is at which network interface the virtual server name (ldap, sso and http ) for the ocs cluster should be created ? at the user network interface or the ocs network interface ?. Do the virtual name need an ip addresses ?
    Thanks for any info.
    Regards
    lanang

    Which articles & documentation have you read already? I don't want to duplicate what they've covered.
    http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise

  • Prevent Load Balancing in a Remote Desktop Services Deployment

    We need to prevent two Remote Desktop Session Hosts from load balancing between each other. Currently they are load balanced and users dont have a means of ensuring they end up on a particular server. Is there anyway that we can accomplish this?
    Cheers

    Hi,
    You can try below group policy might useful in your case.
    Computer configuration>Administrative Templates>Windows Components>Remote Desktop Services>Remote Desktop Session Host>RD Connection Broker
    Use RD Connection Broker Load Balancing: Disable
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • JSF and load balancing issues

    Hello,
    We are having a difficult time getting our app to work correctly on our load balanced system. Any help / suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
    We have a very basic load balancer which is in round robin mode (this cannot be changed), two separate vms, each with an instance of apache(2.0.54) and tomcat(6.0.14). Each apache talks only to the tomcat on the same vm and the tomcats are configured to session replicate with each other (which is happening).
    When I log in to the app and start pressing a few buttons there are no problems for a little while. I then leave the screen idle for 1 minute and resume pressing buttons. The main session bean which holds information about where the user is and other key information, gets its constructor called and is set back to default and the page goes back to the main menu. Immediately before the bean is reset, the logs show the following:
    [MyApp] 17 Jun 2009 15:33:27,514 WARN: [ajp-8009-2 LoggerListener.onApplicationEvent(60)] : Authentication event AuthenticationSuccessEvent: v; details: (etc etc removed&hellip;)This is what the two logs look like:
    VM1 - Authentication event          
    VM2 - Main menu
    VM2 - Presss a button &ndash; progress a screen
    VM2 - Presss a button &ndash; progress a screen
    VM2 - Presss a button &ndash; progress a screen
    VM2 - Presss a button &ndash; progress a screen
    [wait 1 min]
    VM1 - Authentication event
    VM1 - Bean reset
    Processing continues, but screen is redirected to main menu
    We have the distributable tag in the web.xml file and javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD is set to client. Its set to client as the app will not work at all with it set to server (keeps asking for the user to re-log in).
    Thank you,
    Victoria

    Looks like a Tomcat issue to me. JSF is not going to timeout in 1 minute. You might want to check your Tomcat replication settings. Note try to do a very simple loadbalancing application that just echos the Tomcat is executing on.

  • Load Balancing and Clustering

    How can I connect to my cluster rather than a single
    server in the cluster? I have 3 instances of WLS running on the same machine, and I can connect to these three servers separately (the login.jsp page). However, when I shutdown one of them, the page cannot be displayed, which means that I was connected to the server and not the cluster.
    To understand it better following is the configuration details which i am having:
    1. Admin Server running on 7001 port.
    2. Three server instances(Trade1,Trade2,Trade3) are running on TradeCluster having same ip address (127.0.0.1) and different port number 8001,8011,8021 respectively.
    3. Trade application can be accesses via (127.0.0.1:8001 or 127.0.0.1:8011 or 127.0.0.1:8021) separately.
    If server Trade1 is getting down in that case 127.0.0.1:8001 is showing "page can not be displayed". I tried to use "HttpClusterServlet" for load balancing but it was not working. How i can access application through ome common URL and how can a configure load balancing.
    Can anybody help me find out what I might have missed.
    TIA
    Sunil

    Hi,
    we need to specify the cluster information in web.xml like
    <web-app>
    <servlet>
    <servlet-name>HttpClusterServlet</servlet-name>
    <servlet-class>
    weblogic.servlet.proxy.HttpClusterServlet
    </servlet-class>
    <init-param>
    <param-name>WebLogicCluster</param-name>
    <param-value>
    hostname1:7736|hostname2:7736|hostname:7736
    </param-value>
    </init-param>
    </servlet>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>HttpClusterServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>/</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>HttpClusterServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>HttpClusterServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>*.htm</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-mapping>
    <servlet-name>HttpClusterServlet</servlet-name>
    <url-pattern>*.html</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    </web-app>
    and deploy the application target to cluster
    Prasanna Yalam

  • Need help with ACE Load Balancing Base on URL pattern

    This is the first time for me trying to configure something like this on the ACE load balancer.  I need help configuring a load balancing policy base on URL pattern.  URL https://ineedhelp.com base on /willuhelpme and /imlost
    Key: ineedhelp_key
    cert:  ineedhelp_cert
    serverfarmA
    serverA 10.1.1.1 443
    serverfarmB
    serverB 10.1.1.2 443
    ineedhelp.com/willuhelpme-------serverfarmA
    ineedhelp.ocm/imlost---------------serverfarmB

    This is the first time for me trying to configure something like this on the ACE load balancer.  I need help configuring a load balancing policy base on URL pattern.  URL https://ineedhelp.com base on /willuhelpme and /imlost
    Key: ineedhelp_key
    cert:  ineedhelp_cert
    serverfarmA
    serverA 10.1.1.1 443
    serverfarmB
    serverB 10.1.1.2 443
    ineedhelp.com/willuhelpme-------serverfarmA
    ineedhelp.ocm/imlost---------------serverfarmB

  • Load balancing not happending but fail over is for Read only Entity beans

              The following are the configuration.
              Two NT servers with WL5.1 sp9 having only EJBs(Read only entity beans)
              One Client with WL5.1 sp9 having servlet/java application as
              EJB client.
              I am trying to make a call like findbyprimarykey in one of the
              entity bean. I could see the request is being directed only to the one of the
              server always. When I bring that server, fail over is happening to the other server.
              Here are the settings I have in the ejb-jar.xml :
                        <entity>
                             <ejb-name>device.StartHome</ejb-name>
                             <home>com.wl.api.device.StartHome</home>
                             <remote>com.wl.api.device.StartRemote</remote>
                             <ejb-class>com.wl.server.device.StartImpl</ejb-class>
                             <persistence-type>Bean</persistence-type>
                             <prim-key-class>java.lang.Long</prim-key-class>
                             <reentrant>False</reentrant>
                             <resource-ref>
                                  <res-ref-name>jdbc/wlPool</res-ref-name>
                                  <res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
                                  <res-auth>Container</res-auth>
                             </resource-ref>
                        </entity>
              Here are the settings I have in the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml.
              <weblogic-enterprise-bean>
                        <ejb-name>device.StartHome</ejb-name>
                        <caching-descriptor>
                             <max-beans-in-cache>50</max-beans-in-cache>
                             <cache-strategy>Read-Only</cache-strategy>
                             <read-timeout-seconds>900</read-timeout-seconds>
                        </caching-descriptor>
                        <reference-descriptor>
                             <resource-description>
                                  <res-ref-name>jdbc/wlPool</res-ref-name>
                                  <jndi-name>weblogic.jdbc.pool.wlPool</jndi-name>
                             </resource-description>
                        </reference-descriptor>
                        <enable-call-by-reference>False</enable-call-by-reference>
                        <jndi-name>device.StartHome</jndi-name>
                   </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              Am I doin any mistake in this?
              Any one's help is appreciated.
              Thanks
              Suresh
              

    we are using 5.1
              "Gene Chuang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              > Colocation optimization occurs if your client resides in the same
              container (and also in the same
              > EAR for 6.0) as your ejbs.
              >
              > Gene
              >
              > "Suresh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              > > Ok....the ejb-call-by-reference set to true is making the call to one
              server
              > > only. i am not sure why it is. I removed the property name and it
              works.
              > > Also I have one question, in our prduct environment, when i cache the
              ejb
              > > home it is not doing the load balancing. can any one help me for that.
              > > thanks
              > >
              > > Mike,
              > > From the sample pgm I sent, even from single client calls get load
              > > balanced.
              > >
              > > Suresh
              > >
              > >
              > > "Gene Chuang" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > In WL, LoadBalancing will ONLY WORK if you reuse your EJBHome! Take
              your
              > > StartEndPointHome lookup
              > > > out of your for loop and see if this fixes your problem.
              > > >
              > > > I've seen this discussion in ejb-interest, and some other vendor
              (Borland,
              > > I believe it is), brings
              > > > up an interesting point: Clustering and LoadBalance is not in the
              J2EE
              > > specs, hence implementation
              > > > is totally up to the vendor. Weblogic loadbalances from the remote
              > > interfaces (EJBObject, EJBHome,
              > > > etc..), while Borland loadbalances from JNDI Context lookup.
              > > >
              > > > Let me suggest a third implmentation: loadbalance from BOTH Context
              > > lookup as well as stub method
              > > > invocation! Or create a smart replica-aware list manager which
              persists
              > > on the client thread
              > > > (ThreadLocal) and is aware of lookup/evocation history. Hence if I do
              the
              > > following in a client
              > > > hitting a 3 node cluster, I'll still get perfect round-robining
              regardless
              > > of what I do on the
              > > > client side:
              > > >
              > > > InitialContext ctxt = new InitialContext();
              > > > EJBHome myHome = ctxt.lookup(MY_BEAN);
              > > > myHome.findByPrimaryKey(pk); <== hits Node #1
              > > > myHome = ctxt.lookup(MY_BEAN);
              > > > myHome.findByPrimaryKey(pk); <== hits Node #2
              > > > myHome.findByPrimaryKey(pk); <== hits Node #3
              > > > myHome = ctxt.lookup(MY_BEAN);
              > > > myHome.findByPrimaryKey(pk); <== hits Node #1
              > > > ...
              > > >
              > > >
              > > > Gene
              > > >
              > > > "Suresh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > > Mike ,
              > > > >
              > > > > Do you have any reasons for the total number of machines to be 10.
              > > > >
              > > > > I tried with 7 machines.
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > > Here is my sample client java application running individual in the
              > > seven
              > > > > machines.
              > > > >
              > > > > StartEndPointHome =
              > > > > (StartEndPointHome)ctx.lookup("dev.StartEndPointHome");
              > > > > for(;;)
              > > > > {
              > > > > // logMsg(" --in loop "+currentTime);
              > > > > if (currentTime > nextRefereshTime)
              > > > > {
              > > > > logMsg("****- going to call");
              > > > > currentTime=getSystemTime();
              > > > > nextRefereshTime=currentTime+timeInterval;
              > > > > StartEndPointHome =
              > > > > (StartEndPointHome)ctx.lookup("dev.StartEndPointHome");
              > > > > long rndno=(long)(Math.random()*10)+range;
              > > > > logMsg(" going to call remotestub"+rndno);
              > > > > retVal =
              > > > >
              > >
              ((StartEndPointHome)getStartHome()).findByNumber("pe"+rndno+"_mportal_dsk36.
              > > > > mportal.com");
              > > > >
              > > > > logMsg("**++- called stub");
              > > > > }
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > > The range value is different for each of the machines in the
              cluster.
              > > > >
              > > > > If the first request starts at srv1, all request starts hitting the
              same
              > > > > server.
              > > > > If the first request starts at srv2, all request starts hitting the
              same
              > > > > server.
              > > > >
              > > > > I have the following for the url , user and pwd values for the
              context
              > > .
              > > > >
              > > > > public static String url="t3://10.11.12.14,10.11.12.117:8000";
              > > > > public static String user="guest";
              > > > > public static String password="guest";
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > > It would be great if you could help me.
              > > > >
              > > > > Thanks
              > > > > suresh
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > > "Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > > >
              > > > > > If you have only one client don't be surprised if you only hit one
              > > server.
              > > > > Try
              > > > > > running ten different clients and see if the hit the same server.
              > > > > >
              > > > > > Mike
              > > > > >
              > > > > >
              > > > > > "suresh" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >The following are the configuration.
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > Two NT servers with WL5.1 sp9 having only EJBs(Read only entity
              > > beans)
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > One Client with WL5.1 sp9 having servlet/java application as
              > > > > > > EJB client.
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >I am trying to make a call like findbyprimarykey in one of the
              > > > > > >entity bean. I could see the request is being directed only to
              the
              > > one
              > > > > > >of the
              > > > > > >server always. When I bring that server, fail over is happening
              to
              > > the
              > > > > > >other server.
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >Here are the settings I have in the ejb-jar.xml :
              > > > > > > <entity>
              > > > > > > <ejb-name>device.StartHome</ejb-name>
              > > > > > > <home>com.wl.api.device.StartHome</home>
              > > > > > > <remote>com.wl.api.device.StartRemote</remote>
              > > > > > > <ejb-class>com.wl.server.device.StartImpl</ejb-class>
              > > > > > > <persistence-type>Bean</persistence-type>
              > > > > > > <prim-key-class>java.lang.Long</prim-key-class>
              > > > > > > <reentrant>False</reentrant>
              > > > > > > <resource-ref>
              > > > > > > <res-ref-name>jdbc/wlPool</res-ref-name>
              > > > > > > <res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
              > > > > > > <res-auth>Container</res-auth>
              > > > > > > </resource-ref>
              > > > > > > </entity>
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >Here are the settings I have in the weblogic-ejb-jar.xml.
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > ><weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              > > > > > > <ejb-name>device.StartHome</ejb-name>
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > <caching-descriptor>
              > > > > > > <max-beans-in-cache>50</max-beans-in-cache>
              > > > > > > <cache-strategy>Read-Only</cache-strategy>
              > > > > > > <read-timeout-seconds>900</read-timeout-seconds>
              > > > > > > </caching-descriptor>
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > <reference-descriptor>
              > > > > > > <resource-description>
              > > > > > > <res-ref-name>jdbc/wlPool</res-ref-name>
              > > > > > > <jndi-name>weblogic.jdbc.pool.wlPool</jndi-name>
              > > > > > > </resource-description>
              > > > > > > </reference-descriptor>
              > > > > > > <enable-call-by-reference>False</enable-call-by-reference>
              > > > > > > <jndi-name>device.StartHome</jndi-name>
              > > > > > > </weblogic-enterprise-bean>
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >Am I doin any mistake in this?
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > >Any one's help is appreciated.
              > > > > > >Thanks
              > > > > > >Suresh
              > > > > >
              > > > >
              > > > >
              > > >
              > > >
              > >
              > >
              >
              >
              

  • Weblogic 11g load balancing configeration

    how can configure load balancing in weblogic 11 server

    Load balancing has to be done from the outside with an external load balancer, could be a Hardware or Software (such as webcache in OAS 10.1.2 ), WebLogic could do a Clustering service where several machines could host failed processes from died machine, but they nead a external Load balancer.
    Hope it helps.

  • Cluster/load balance weblogic using L4 switch like Alteon

    Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more server and
              cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like Alteon Layer4
              switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to maintain a single copy
              of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among servers)?
              BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use a Layer 4
              switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the application server
              layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a single server
              (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers or 20 weblogic
              servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable, sacalable and fast.
              I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers need to
              share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this approach will
              fail.
              

    So My understanding is:
              Alteon with WL 6.0 can do load balancing for:
              entity bean
              stateless session bean
              but can't do load balancing for:
              stateful session bean (will persistent/sticky binding solve part of the
              problem except fail-over)
              in-memory replication
              am I right?
              Pao Wan
              "Don Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              news:[email protected]...
              > It is possible to configure Alteon to understand the WebLogic 6.0 cookie
              format
              > and have a proxy-less cluster configuration that performs load balancing
              and
              > fail over of session state.
              >
              > It is also possible to configure Alteon's hardware-based SSL decryption
              for really
              > fast HTTPS processing.
              >
              > We are working on a white paper that describes how to configure Alteon for
              use
              > with WebLogic Server 6.0.
              >
              > -Don
              >
              >
              > Robert Patrick wrote:
              >
              > > Cameron,
              > >
              > > I believe that BEA tested their new proxy-less web clustering solution
              with
              > > load-balancing products from Alteon and several other vendors
              (Arrowpoint ?--
              > > which is now Cisco). However, it was my understanding that these
              products do
              > > not understand how to decrypt our cookies and extract IP addresses but
              rather
              > > these products are capable of doing sticky load balancing based on the
              Session
              > > ID contained in our cookie.
              > >
              > > If this is correct, then what this means is that when the primary server
              fails,
              > > the request will be routed to "some other server" in the cluster but not
              > > necessarily the one that holds the secondary copy of the user's session.
              The
              > > change in WLS 6.0 is that WLS will accept these misdirected requests and
              it will
              > > go out to the correct server and "migrate" the session to the server
              that
              > > received the request making that server the new primary (and
              regenerating the
              > > Session ID).
              > >
              > > I am sure if this is wrong that our product manager or one of our
              engineers will
              > > correct me (please?)...
              > >
              > > Hope this helps,
              > > Robert
              > >
              > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
              > >
              > > > Hi Robert,
              > > >
              > > > FWIW - There are several vendors (Primeon? Arrowpoint?) who claim to
              > > > understand WL cookies and parse the IPs out. (I haven't verified it
              myself
              > > > though.)
              > > >
              > > > --
              > > > Cameron Purdy
              > > > Tangosol, Inc.
              > > > http://www.tangosol.com
              > > > +1.617.623.5782
              > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
              > > >
              > > > "Robert Patrick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > > There are not any hardware vendors (yet) that can understand
              WebLogic's
              > > > session
              > > > > ID. While you might be able to use the load balancer without the
              proxy on
              > > > 5.1,
              > > > > you would not be able to take advantage of in-memory replication
              failover
              > > > unless
              > > > > you only had two machines in the cluster. Like you said, everything
              will
              > > > work
              > > > > with 6.0 regardless of how the load balancer works (though you
              really,
              > > > really
              > > > > want to minimize the number of times the requests come into the
              wrong
              > > > server by
              > > > > utilizing sticky load balancing).
              > > > >
              > > > > Hope this helps,
              > > > > Robert
              > > > >
              > > > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
              > > > >
              > > > > > Rajesh,
              > > > > >
              > > > > > I meant that it would work in lieu of a proxy (such as Apache or
              NES)
              > > > with
              > > > > > 5.1, but only if both the hw load balancer and WL were set up to
              use
              > > > > > cookies. Some hw load balancers rely on IP and that doesn't
              work -- AOL
              > > > > > connections for example can change the source IP on the fly.
              Others
              > > > produce
              > > > > > their own cookies, that will work. Some even can use WL cookies
              and
              > > > parse
              > > > > > them to determine where to go. According to what I've read, with
              6.0 if
              > > > the
              > > > > > WL primary dies or for some other reason the request shows up at
              the
              > > > "wrong"
              > > > > > server, it will be handled correctly. That means you are pretty
              safe
              > > > with
              > > > > > hw load balancers and 6.0, almost regardless of the sticky
              > > > implementation
              > > > > > that they use.
              > > > > >
              > > > > > --
              > > > > > Cameron Purdy
              > > > > > Tangosol, Inc.
              > > > > > http://www.tangosol.com
              > > > > > +1.617.623.5782
              > > > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
              > > > > >
              > > > > > "Rajesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > > > > news:[email protected]...
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > Hi Cameron,
              > > > > > > Can you elaborate on how it would work with WL5.1 since no in
              memory
              > > > > > replication
              > > > > > > would happen if the servers are standalone.
              > > > > > >
              > > > > > > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
              > > > > > > >Yes, this will work fine with WL6. (WL5.1 will work fine as
              long as
              > > > > > cookies
              > > > > > > >are used by the load balancer.)
              > > > > > > >
              > > > > > > >--
              > > > > > > >Cameron Purdy
              > > > > > > >Tangosol, Inc.
              > > > > > > >http://www.tangosol.com
              > > > > > > >+1.617.623.5782
              > > > > > > >WebLogic Consulting Available
              > > > > > > >
              > > > > > > >
              > > > > > > >"paowan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
              > > > > > > >news:[email protected]...
              > > > > > > >> Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more
              server
              > > > and
              > > > > > > >> cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like
              Alteon
              > > > > > Layer4
              > > > > > > >> switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to
              maintain a
              > > > single
              > > > > > > >copy
              > > > > > > >> of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among
              servers)?
              > > > > > > >>
              > > > > > > >> BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use
              a
              > > > Layer
              > > > > > > >4
              > > > > > > >> switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the
              application
              > > > > > server
              > > > > > > >> layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a
              single
              > > > > > server
              > > > > > > >> (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers
              or 20
              > > > > > weblogic
              > > > > > > >> servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable,
              sacalable
              > > > and
              > > > > > > >fast.
              > > > > > > >>
              > > > > > > >> I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers
              need to
              > > > > > > >> share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this
              > > > approach
              > > > > > will
              > > > > > > >> fail.
              > > > > > > >>
              > > > > > > >>
              > > > > > > >
              > > > > > > >
              > > > > > >
              > > > >
              >
              

  • 2012 R2 Load-Balanced RDS farm

    Hi,
    I am basically looking for this information for 2008 R2, but for 2012 R2:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753891.aspx
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    For Windows Server 2012, firstly, you need to add multiple RD sessions host servers in a remote desktop collections. If you do not configure HA for RDCB, you can refer to the following.
    And, you can configure load balancing settings in the collection properties.
    Then, use the collection name to create a Host record in your DNS server and point it to the RDCB server.
    After that, please use the CollectionName.domain.com as the connection name for the remote desktop clients.
    Also, you can refer to Create a RDSH FARM RDS 2012 using DNS Round Robin
    http://ryanmangansitblog.wordpress.com/2013/03/30/create-a-rdsh-farm-rds-2012-using-dns-round-robin/
    Note: The third-party product discussed here is manufactured by a company that is independent of Microsoft. We make no warranty, implied or otherwise, regarding this product's performance
    or reliability.
    More information:
    How do you configure a farm name in RDS 2012?
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/8703aafb-d3d5-4c43-a8cd-1169e5eec2ea/how-do-you-configure-a-farm-name-in-rds-2012?forum=winserverTS
    Management (how to) changes for RDS in Windows Server 2012 and 2012R2
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20684.management-how-to-changes-for-rds-in-windows-server-2012-and-2012r2.aspx
    Hope this helps.
    Jeremy Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exposing a webservice on ECC 5.0 in a load balancing setup

    Hi
       We have a webservice exposed on ECC 5.0 that is being invoked by an external system. When we move this webservice to our production environment - which is load balanced and has a logon group setup - we need to be able to expose this webservice - not on a single application server - but be available on the logon group ( message server ) so that the url that we provide for the webservice to the external system does not contain  a single application server - but points to the logon group. We do not have a web dispatcher in our environment/architecture.
    How do we go about exposing this point-to-point webservice on ECC 5.0 in a load balanced setup ? Any suggestions, experiences that can be shared ?

    This  can be done though SICF.
    If you click on a service, their is a service data tab.
    underthat tab is a Load Balancing option.
    This then points the service at the SMLG logon group.
    Regards
    James

Maybe you are looking for