RE: Camera Raw and Smart Objects

Hello Everyone.
I have a question please.
Inside the Camera Raw 8.1, Inside the Workflow Options, I Checked the Box for Open In Photoshop as a Smart Objects.
I noticed Inside the Camera Raw, Open Image box turn to, Open Object box.  I click on open, and It opened the Image as a Smart Objects Inside the Photoshop.
If I make any changes to the Image, and If I Double Click on the Smart Object, It will Open In Camera Raw again which Is good.
I also noticed If I do any changes to the Image Inside the Camera Raw to the Smart Object after clicking on Open Smart Objects I see the changes Inside the Photoshop also.
But If I do any changes to the Image Inside the Photoshop,and later I Double Click on the Image the Image opens Inside the Camera Raw, without any changes.
This Is my question: The Smart Object Image Is still a Raw Image ?
This Is my next question:
I know If I open a Raw Image Inside the Camera Raw, and If I click on Done, the image is still a Raw Image, which Is good, and If I click on Reset Bottom, It will reset It back. If I only change the White Balance  and Click on  Done and go back to the Camera Raw again, and I choose As Shot, the Image goes back the  Original Raw file.
But If I do other changes such as the exposure, any color change, and click on done I can never go back to the original..
In the past month I been working with the Lightroom, and I noticed if I open a Raw image Inside the Lightroom, and do any changes to that Image,,  any time I can click on the Reset and the Raw image goes back to its original.
I don't think we can do this with Camera Raw can we ?

Clear removes the Camera raw settings completely. You will not see the adjustment icon on the thumbnail in Bridge
Camera Raw Defaults will show the icon and double clicking the thumbnail will always open it in Camera Raw with the Default settings.  The Default is "As Shot", which is why you don't see any difference. It's when you choose a Custom Default that you will. It will stay with the Camera Raw file.
See this article by Julienne Kost.
http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/2009/10/setting_new_camera_raw_default.html
Another difference is with Jpegs. Open a Jpeg in ACR, make an adjustment, click "Done".  Select "Camera Raw Defaults" and it will always open in ACR instead of Photoshop.  Select "Clear" and it's a normal jpeg that will once again open in Photoshop.
Basically that's about all I know, I normally don't use ACR much.

Similar Messages

  • Lightroom develop, Photoshop Raw and Smart objects

    I understand that Lightroom's Develop function and Photoshop Raw adjustments are the same.  So I adjust in either or.  I can then open the photo as a smart object in photoshop. I can then make further adjustments as an adjustment layer. Which I think is the same as both Lightroom's Develop function and Photoshop Raw adjustments?  I understand smart objects allows non destructive editing and smart filters.
    SO my questions are: When would you not open the photo as a smart object? Surely I should always open the photo as a smart object?  If I want to do any editing not allowed to smart objects such as clone stamp I can then create a layer and then apply the clone stamp to the layer, can't I?
    Secondly, should I also convert all layers to smart layers or leave them as a normal layer.
    Or thirdly, am I way off track?

    If I want to do any editing not allowed to smart objects such as clone stamp I can then create a layer and then apply the clone stamp to the layer, can't I?
    And that is where the underlying Smart Object starts losing (some of) its usefulness.
    Because all those edits will be unaffected if you should choose to change the development settings of the embedded RAW.
    Secondly, should I also convert all layers to smart layers or leave them as a normal layer.
    What for?
    Unless you want to non-destructively apply transformations or Filters or need several instances of something in one file it would mainly cause a drag on performance. (Edit: or bloat the files’s size)
    But in those cases Smart Objects offer significant advantages.

  • RAW as Smart Objects - Lock Edge Pixel Opacity During Resize

    I'm a professional fine art printer.  I prepare images for large format printing, often starting from the original RAW files.  Since the feature to open RAW files as Smart Objects in Camera Raw was introduced, I've been doing that, as it allows me to go back into the Raw file at anytime and re-tweak as I layer.  I love this option and it is totally indispensable to my workflow.
    HOWEVER, I find a serious flaw when resizing the image for final print, or even when resizing for web-output.  If I do any interpolation (pixel resizing) up or down, the edge pixels are not locked in place, and treated as if they are a floating object, therefore the edge pixels usually show up at a lower opacity, (see attached image).  This KILLS my workflow!  It means I have to completely flatten my work and then resize, loosing all my groovy layers and the ability to go back into Camera Raw and make final tweaks while I make test prints and final decisions with the client by my side.
    Even worse, when I apply the final print sharpening and flatten the file to send out, the edge transparency issue is compounded, and the sharpening adds an ugly halo around the whole image, BLAH!
    What I need is a way for Smart Objects with the exact same pixel dimensions as the file to lock their edge pixels at the current opacity when resizing.  In other words, I need Photoshop to treat the Smart Object as a true Background Layer for certain purposes, while still being able to go back into Camera Raw as I like.  I notice the ability to lock transparency is gone on Smart Objects, which I'm sure is necessary for compositing, but not for what I'm doing at all.
    Is there anyway this can be done in the current CS5 or 5.5 (haven't upgraded yet) that I'm simply missing?  Can anyone from Adobe confirm that this is something you'll look into for me?
    Thanks so much, absolutely loving Adobe products these days, you guys rock!
    Best,
    -B

    I'm not going to say anything about the abysmal rendering of Vector Smart Objects in CS6 because it'll be beating a dead horse but I can explain the issues you see with measurements after scaling.
    The slightly disproportionate scaling and half-pixel shift of the centre is unavoidable when it happens because the resulting Smart Object/Vector Smart Object must measure an integer number of pixels in height and width and be perfectly aligned to the document pixel grid. That's true in CS5 and CS6.
    Say a SO/VSO originally measures 102 x 103 pixels and you scale it by 50%. The Options bar may say the result is 51 x 51.5 px but the result will really be 51 x 52 px, and therefore the new height will really be 50.49% of the old height.
    The original SO/VSO is an even number of pixels wide and an odd number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway down a pixel. The 50%-scaled SO/VSO is an odd number of pixels wide and an even number of pixels high, therefore its centre will be halfway across a pixel.

  • ACR4.2, Lightroom, CS3 and Smart Objects

    OK - here's something that's really bugging me and I just don't seem to be able to come up with an easy answer or solution although it might be staring me in the face. Hoping someone else can help here.
    Situation 1: I open an image in LR, do a few minor edits to WB etc and then click Ctrl+E (PC of course) to Export the image to CS3. My Export options are set as TIFF/ProPhoto/16 bits/no compression. The image now opens up in CS3 as expected. I then convert this image to a Smart Object which is so indicated in the Layers Panel. I then choose New Smart Object via Copy and now have the original Smart Object and it's copy in the Layers Panel. Here comes the puzzling part - if I now double-click on the Smart Object thumbnail I am presented with a pop-up window that states "after editing the contents, choose File > Save to commit the changes".
    Situation 2: If outside of LR I right-click on a RAW file and choose edit in CS3 it opens up ACR4.2 with the same edit sliders as in Lightroom. I now apply exactly the same minor edits as I did in Lightroom and upon completion I press and hold the shift key which changes the Open Image button to Open Object and sure enough the image now opens up in CS3 as a Smart Object. Up to this point both routes lead me seeing the same window. I now repeat what I did previously i.e. New Smart Object via Copy.
    The big difference now however, is that when I double-click on the Smart Object thumbnail it now opens up in Camera Raw as I want it to. There is no pop-up window as was the case when I followed the LR route into CS3.
    I am at a loss to understand why it should be different. There obviously doesn't appear to be a fault/bug with CS3 because things happen exactly as I expect them to. It's only when first going into CS3 via LR first does this strange pop-up window appear and I am not able to double-click on the Smart Object thumnail so opening it up in Camera Raw. Is it a bug, is it my Export settings or is it just me - frustrated?

    I know it doesn't make sense, but that's the way it is. Here's what I do in the same situation.
    First, I'm converting my raws to DNG files. I chose to do this so I don't have to worry about when to write out the sidecar files.
    I take an image in LR, edit it he way I want.
    I then go to Grid view, select the image, right click and select Show in Finder (or in your case, Explorer).
    I then right click on the file icon in Finder/Explorer and Open in Photoshop. This opens the image in the Camera Raw dialog with all my edits in place. I then open the file as a smart object.
    When I click on the smart object in PS to re-edit it, I go of course to the camera raw dialog. I then edit what I want.
    When I'm done with the file in PS, I save it out as a JPEG/TIFF/PSD, whatever is appropriate for that type of file.
    I close PS
    I then go to LR, in the Grid View, go to the folder holding the new JPEG/TIF/PSD image (in my case, the same folder as the raw file is in.
    I right click on the folder and chose Sync.
    Now I have two filed. My original DNG with the latest changes, no matter if they were done in LR or Camera Raw, and my JPEG/TIFF/PSD file.
    I do it this way because I like to use LR for printing.
    You can do all this without converting to DNG, but you have to remember to write out the metadata to the side car files when you leave LR.
    Hope this helps

  • ACR and Smart Objects

    ACR and Smart Objects...
    Ok, I'm trying to take the plunge into Smart Objects. I want to control localized luminance as well as localized contrast adjustments (using masks in PS CS3) in a non destructive and flexible way. Instead of the usual: bringing into PS multiple exposures of a single Raw image, or bringing into PS multiple bracketed images (landscape) I am exploring the idea of bringing these images into PS as Smart Objects.
    I have figured out how to work with multiple copies of a single Raw image as Smart Objects, but can not figure out how to get different bracketed Raw files layered into PS as Smart Objects...
    Would someone offer some assistance, if it is possible?
    Thank you!

    >Would someone offer some assistance, if it is possible?
    If you have multiple images (as opposed to multi versions of the same image) you'll need to open each of the images as separate SO's and separate documents, then drag them into one document.

  • Why do my raws look different when I view them in Adobe Bridge/Adobe Camera Raw and Canons Digital P

    Hello all,
    I am sorta new to taking Raw photographs and I have been been using Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw to edit. When I take my photos (I am using a Canon t2i) I have it set to save a raw and a jpg. When I view these images in Adobe Bridge/Camera Raw I notice a clear difference in the jpg and raw (I understand the whole concept behind raw vs. jpg. so im not questioning why one looks different) It is obvious all the adjustments that were applied to my jpg. vs the natural raw.  My question is: When I view the same two images in the software that came with my camera, canon digital photo professionals, the canon and raw look almost identical.... My assumption is that canon is applying the same "adjustments" to my raw as it did to the jpgs?  Has anyone used these two programs and noticed this?
    Thank you in advance for your assistance.
    Michelle

    Can't say I'm an expert on DPP myself either.  I've only run it a few times myself.
    If you're seeing Photoshop freeze just by looking at the File Info tab, that's certainly not expected and you should start a tread specifically to discuss that.  The forum may be able to help you get that working.
    I happen to like the color my camera delivers in its embedded JPEGs (which I use to quickly review shots via IrfanView).  Starting with that color in Camera Raw by default just feels very natural and integrated.
    Without a specific custom profile to help you with the task, here's my suggestions for the next best thing:
    1.  Take an image with a range of different colors in it.
    2.  Open the embedded JPEG also using whatever means you have to do so.
    3.  Open it also in Camera Raw and make sure you're using the Camera Raw default parameters.
    4.  Go into the Camera Calibration tab (little camera icon), and choose the Camera Standard profile as provided by Adobe.
    5.  Tweak the various sliders so as to match the color between what you're seeing in the JPEG and Camera Raw.
    6.  Save new Camera Raw defaults.
    Some notes:
    Make sure you leave the White Balance on As Shot, since storing a specific white balance is probably not going to be helpful.
    Test your settings and repeat the above to tweak them as needed using other images.
    Keep in mind that not every application does proper color-management.  IrfanView can be set up to do so, and I don't recall whether you have to tweak a default setting to make it do that or not (it's been a while).
    Hope this helps!
    -Noel

  • Camera raw and bridge: no dialogue in cs3

    After purchasing the Nikon D300 I had to upgrade from CS2 to CS3 as former versions of photoshop are unable to manage the RAW files (NEF) generated by the new camera.
    My problem is that, even having downloaded the 4.3.1 version of Camera Raw and having installed it, there is no dialogue with bridge. I tried to reinstall CS3 as well.
    This means:
    - I miss the Camera Raw preferences setting (under the edit menu in bridge)
    - Always in Bridge I cannot cut and paste (copy and apply) camera raw settings of one photo to others. Neither selecting the edit menu, nor with the mouse's right button.
    The point is not that these and similar selections do not work, the point is that they do not even appear in the menus. The help resources, for instance, tell about a Edit > Develop Settings function that is not present in my menu.
    What is wrong? Is it possible that there is any kind of conflict with Nikon capture NX?
    I'll be grateful to anyone able to help me,
    fm

    Hi All,
    Been reading this thread with interest.
    I am on PC with XP, I have been using CS3 for quite a while now and both my D200 and D300 have all been working perfectly. But over the last few months I have noticed that Bridge was (a) very slow to start and (b) would suddenly come up with the "Bridge has encountered a problem and must close" message. Then it got to the stage were Bridge would not open at all and just the "Problem" message would show and then next PS3 then starting displayed the "There has been a cataclysmic Failure" message.
    So I have used the original CS3 CD and uninstalled and reinstalled and got both programs working but no Camera Raw. If I click on the NEF file it goes to PS and gets the message wrong file type. All the preferences are set ok.
    The other thing that happened was when I downloaded all the updates, Bridge went back to not opening and the "problem" message showing again.
    After reading Xoslic message I will try to take out the registry entries and reinstall again and see if that works.
    For all of you on Nikon, CS3 was working perfectly for me until just recently, so I know that it does work fine.
    Hopefully I will get a soloution and let you know if it works.
    Gerry
    PS. I also had a problem in that Lightroom 1.4 would not work either, opened ok but "lightroom has encountered a problem" message appeared and it closed down. Other people suggested that the problem lay in "Version Cue"

  • How do I install the RC updates to my PS CC, camera raw and Lightroom?

    How do I install the RC updates to my PS CC, camera raw and Lightroom? I have downloaded the correct versions from the Lab site but I still can't open my Nikon D-610 RAW files. The site says follow on screen instructions but I have not found any. Help please.

    Please ensure that for CC you have downloaded ACR 8.3 - CC:
    http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/cameraraw8-3-cc.html
    Please extract the downloaded .zip file to Desktop and then run .exe file.
    After successful installation try opening D610 files, This should work.
    Regards,
    Ashutosh

  • Open pictures in Camera RAW and still have paths/clipping paths?

    Hello
    A big problem in Bridge is that I can not open my pictures in Camera RAW and still have my paths left. I work in a place where we get loads of product photos from many different companies and they almost always have a clipping path in it. Many of the pictures do we have to fix like colour, exposure etc and this is here Bridge comes in as the best solution to batchfix them. But now I have to take the long way through Photoshop. Is there a solution for this?, an update from Adobe or a script or something.
    Have a nice day!

    You do know that you can deconfigure Camera Raw from opening TIFFs and JPEGs, right?
    These are the settings I've chosen.  Done this way, JPEGs and TIFFs just open right into Photoshop, and their clipping paths would be intact.
    -Noel

  • I edited a .nef file in Camera Raw and PSE 11 saved it as a .xmp file.  I cannot open it now.

    I edited a .nef file in Camera Raw and PSE 11 saved it as a .xmp file.  I cannot open it now.
    I am not sure if this is an issue but Windows does not recognize the .xmp file and give it an icon with the photo's picture.  On a related note, when I edited some .nef files and Windows saved it as .dng file, it too, like the .xmp file, Windows does not recognize the .dng file and give it an icon with the photo's picture.
    Do I need to download something to create this icon?

    PSE didn't save your file as an .xmp file. The .xmp file is not the image--that's still the .nef. The xmp file is what adobe calls a 'sidecar' file, just a record of the settings you used in the raw converter. As long as it's in the same place as the image, when you open the nef in ACR again, it will open where you left off, with the settings you chose.
    If you want to save as, you have two choices:
    1. Click the Open button in the raw converter window and save in the image format of your choice.
    2. Use the Save button in the raw converter to create a separate DNG file, which still must be opened in the raw converter and converted to an image format for use in other programs.

  • Why are my images suddenly darker in camera raw and photoshop C4 than when I open them in bridge?

    Why are my images suddenly darker in camera raw and photoshop C4 than when I open them in bridge?

    "Catalog"?  Are you referencing Ps Elements perhaps?
    Wrong forum.  We do not do Elements here.
    Here's the link to the Elements forum:
    Photoshop Elements

  • Camera Raw and DNG Converter 4.4 Now Available

    Details here: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/lightroom_14_and_camera_raw_44.html
    Regards,
    Tom

    Hmmm... I got the DNG Converter and ACR from the page I listed.
    If you go to the DNG page at http://www.adobe.com/products/dng/ and click on Downloads (in the light gray box on the upper right) for Mac or Windows (I'll use the Windows example here because I'm on a PC right now, but it also worked from my Mac) you will go to http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3894 and then you have to click on Proceed to download and it should say filename DNG_Camera)Raw_4_4.zip and be 5.4 meg in size (If you follow the Macintosh link the filename is DNG_Camera_Raw_4_4.dmg and is 12.5MB).
    However, if you go to the Camera Raw page at http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html and click on the download links under the main gray box you will only get the Camera Raw file (filename is Camera_Raw_4_4.zip at 3.3MB or Camera_Raw_4_4.DMG at 7.8MB).
    Both download places list the Product name as Adobe Camera Raw and DNG Converter. But the filenames are different and indicate which one you are downloading.
    JOhn

  • I'm trying to do a batch crop in camera raw and there is no dropdown option in the crop tool to select inches or pixels. How can I fix this?

    I'm trying to do a batch crop in camera raw and there is no dropdown option in the crop tool to select inches or pixels. How can I fix this?

    Create an action to do the crop and user the image processor to batch process your RAW files and have it use your cropping action in the process.

  • Adobe Camera Raw and Adobe Lightroom color profiles ....

    Adobe Camera Raw and Adobe Lightroom color profiles .... for sony cameras

    Adobe Camera Raw and Adobe Lightroom color profiles .... for sony cameras

  • Scale difference between Camera Raw and Lens Correction Filter in CS6

    I have the latest Camera Raw plugin (8.6.0.254). When I open an NEF file from a D800, the resulting image is 4912x7360 pixels, whether I apply distortion correction or not.
    If I load the NEF file, do not apply distortion correction in Camera Raw, but then apply it via the Lens Correction Filter, the image must be rescaled to approximately 4840x7252 (some 98.53%) so that it matches the results of the Camera Raw plugin (minus the missing pixels around all four sides, of course).
    Anyone else notice this (particularly in newer versions of Photoshop)? Is there a way to prevent this cropping? The amount of distortion on the lens (35mm) is minimal and, regardless of that, I would have expected Camera Raw and the Lens Correction filter to output identical images after distortion correction, since the lens profile is the same.

    To see if that can be replicated, we'd need to now the exact version of CS6 you're running (e.g. on Mac you should be on Photoshop CS6 13.0.6) and the exact version of your OS.

Maybe you are looking for

  • New mac mini and noisy dvd drive

    Any time I have a DVD in my brand new mac mini, from commercial DVDs to trying to author a blank DVD, I get the dreaded chainsaw sound that plagues anyone who has owned an xbox 360. Has anyone else suffered with this with their new mac mini or should

  • My iPhone 5 keeps pausing music using 30 pin to lightening adapter in my car

    I have a Blitzsafe iPhone adapter in my car and recently upgraded to the iPhone 5.  I purchased the wired 30 pin to lightening adapter and the music will start off playing fine but it randomly stops the music every 30 seconds or so, doesn't happen al

  • How to get process id in java

    I am executing exe file from my java application by using Runtime.exec How can i find out from my application whether the exe file is running or not?

  • Unable to print book - error with page info

    I'm trying to print a 50 page book. No problem assembling, uploading or purchasing but after a day or two I always get the following message from the Apple store. Due to an error when your order was submitted, the file we received contains incorrect

  • Problems linking to a youtube video within InDesign. Why oh why?

    I have followed the instructions as given in this video tutorial: http://blogs.adobe.com/jlockman/2013/06/04/embedding-youtube-videos-into-your-dps-project/ and my youtube video (with the youtube embed code inserted - https: added) plays in the previ