Re: cProject settlement rule defaulting as PSG during transfer.

Hello
We currrently use multi-level controlling scenario for cProjects, which generates project and subsequent WBS elements automatically.
I am looking at using automatic generation of settlement rules on all WBS elements to default 'CTR' and have created a settlement profile and strategy to incorporate this. The set.profile has been defautled in the project profile in PS and also in the Maintenance for cProjects Controlling scenario config within Accounting integration.
However, every time I transfer the cProject to PS, an error message in the controlling cockpit states 'Receiver categ. 'PSG' is not allowed by settlement rule' - which is correct as I have configured the profile for CTR only.
Is there t-code to access the cProject's defaulted settlement rule so it can changed to CTR and not PSG?
I have checked IAOM0 and doesn't seem to be there.
Thanks
Pablo

Hi Pablo,
I see you encountered this error in 2009 and it hasn't been marked as answered yet.
I was wondering if you found any solution on this one later, because we are facing the same exact error in our current project. I would really appreciate if you share any info. on it.
Thanks,
DHP

Similar Messages

Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi prasanth,
what i think is becoz in configuration for that order type they might have put the settlement rule as Mandatory for release thats why its coming like that. Do one thing change the settlement rule in configuration as Distribution for release and then check.
pls let me know the result after doing
if it is really helpful to you pls reward me with points
regards
Satish

No PSG in settlement rule (table COBRB)

Hi,
I have a Sales Order which had a settlement rule created to PSG and had been settled already. However, currently, the customer of that SO became invalid as well as contract type. So I tried to realign (KEND) this PSG, unfortunately, the current PSG has gone (no PSG no. in table COBRB), in settlement rule, there are some incompleted data left, such as customer, plant...
Now I would like to close this Sales Order (no balance in KVBI), however, since there is incompletion log regarding the incomplete PSG and settlement rule, it is unable to close the SO. In case I tried to end the old settlement rule and create a new one, it seems to be unable to create using the new customer with new mapping.
Please kindly advise how to solve this problem.
Thank you.
Sirirak

answered

Settlement Rule not defaulting in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi,
Thanks...... the issue solved.......
The issue was because of the derivation rule in Controlling.
Prase

How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create work order (IW31)

How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create workorder and saving without release.
I kanow we can make settlement rule mandatory upon Release order but here requirement is
Create work order (IW21) save without releasing that time settlement rule should default.

Hi,
1.If you want the settlement rule default then maintain account assignment data in technical object and when MO is created on that it would be copied into the settlement rule...
2. If you want to make those fields mandatory .... plz check up field selections in config , if you cannot find those then use SHD0 Transaction variant to make those fields mandatory.
3. Enter SHD0 , Enter IW31 in transaction and ZIW31 for transaction variant ..click create option and this takes you to IW31 initial screen , here enter required values of technical object etc and press enter and this gives you IW31 Initial scree screen variant , click continue and this takes you to inside screen and here enter required field values and on pressing enter gives you screen variant .. so you need to enter field values and check the flow of screen variants and on getting settlement rule screen variant select required option for the fields you need.
4. Finally you can save that in package created in SE80 for transporting to other client .., you can activate the variant in SHD0 -->Standard variants -->you can find activate option ..
regrds
pushpa

Require settlement rule when creating a Prod order

Hello,
Hello,
one of our processes is to fabricate complex tools that will be capitalized and depreciated when completed.
while the tools is being fabricated, we would like to settle regularly the production order to a capital order (AUC) and track the budget for the fabrication.
in this production process we want to require the user to enter a capital internal order in the settlement rule of the production order master data.. this way when Prod order is settled we dont have issues. can you make settlement rule entry as required during production order creation?
any input is appreaciated on the issue. Thanks
Andy

Hi,
There is no standart control for this, but I know a PP user exit which excatly meet you requirement.
PPCO0007---User Exit for Checking or Changing Header Fields During Order
You can first control if it is a production order ( ı think it is a special type to produce auc) that you want to control. Then you can select settlement rule and control and give error message settlement rule is mandotory you can not save. The exit sends a signal that it is not possible to save. For error message you can write code into the exit for the message.

Can you require settlement rule in Production order !

Hello,
i am FICO. one of our processes is to fabricate complex tools that will be capitalized and depreciated when completed.
while the tools is being fabricated, we would like to settle regularly the production order to a capital order (AUC) and track the budget for the fabrication.
in this production process we want to require the user to enter a capital internal order in the settlement rule of the production order master data.. this way when Prod order is settled we dont have issues. can you make settlement rule entry as required during production order creation?
any input is appreaciated on the issue. Thanks
Andy

Hi Francois,
I would suggest you to ask the PP user to create production order without Material using transaction CO07.
Here the user can maintain the settlement parameters in the "maintain settlement rule" screen. The account assignment should be "Order - ORD" and can input the internal order number to Settlement reciever feild.
If you need the final product to be delivered then in the component overview add the material number and the quantity in negative qty. System assumes this as byproduct.
Hope this helps.. you. Reward your points if so,
Regards,
Prasobh

SM - Service Order - TECO: Settlement rule (PSG)

Hi Experts,
I would like to know where can I maintain the default values of the Account Assignment in Profitability Segment? When TECOing a service order, I use PSG as the settlement rule. I would like to make the system automatically determine the profit center based on plant and business area.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
nasj

Nasj,
Please post this query in "ERP Financials" forum for better response.
Regards,
Prasobh

Default Settlement Rule for Project Definition

Hi Viewers,
I am having the requirement that, when i create the project, automatically system should create the AUC asset in the project level.
I tried and I am able to make at WBS element level. I need at Project level.
I need help on this...
Regards,
Aswin

Hello,
In Customizing for the order type it is set that orders should be settled periodically (default rule PP2). However, this is not supported for subordinate orders in the collective order.
For this collective order, the system sets the default rule to PP1 regardless of the settings predefined in the order type. Then the collective order is subject to full settlement.
200060 - Periodic settlement in the collective order
Please check if you have any custom development for settlement.
If not then raise this to OSS.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

CProjects to Internal Order - settlement rule

Hi,
Having created an IO from cProjects, I get to see accouting error. Control Cockpit shows "No settlement rule exists for the Order ...".
Going further, this error is coming in the way of the planned costs getting to IO, and subsequently the IO costs coming up in Fin Planning, in RPM.
Please advise on the steps to correct the settlement rule issue. Resolving one issue is likely to solve many of my issues!
Thanks.

Yes. You cannot delete.
If you want to use this new distribution rule from here onwards (means from this period ..) it is possible.
Do the following
1. For old distribution rule (i.e. for old cost center ) change the "valid to period" last month. You can directly change this by clicking the settlement rule in the order master data.
2. For new distribution rule give "valid from period" whatever you want (future periods).
So that you need not delete the old distribution rule.. and from this month onwards your new distribution rule will work.
Radha

Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

Hi Folks,
Could you please advise me on the below issue?
Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
We have applied the below notes:
Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
This note was released at 09.06.2014

Problem in Settlement Receiver during Settlement Rule in T.code IW31/32

Hi,
We have created an Equipment Number 11001212 with Business Area 1451 / Cost center 145130100. After that when are create Order in respect to that Equipment Number through IW31.
During Settlement Rule, when we select Account assignment category CTR - Cost Center...and press F4 on Settlement Receiver column, it shows the value in respect to all Cost Centers.
We want that in settlement receiver column, values should show in respect to related cost center. (defined as per Equipment Master).
Please guide...

Hi,
Pass the Order number in AFIH to get Equipment Number (EQUNR) value.
Pass the Equipment No in V_EQUI table with Valid to date (DATBI) as 31.12.999 & get the value of ILOAN value.
Pass this value in ITOB table & get Cost Center KOSTL value.
In IWO10027 user exit, in F4 possible entry option, ABAP people can restrict the required cost center.
IWO10009 PM Order: Customer Check for 'Save' Event
Even though the user enters manually some other cost center without going for F4 option, by check that value, you can give the error message, while saving the order.
Pass the Order number in AUFK table to get Object Number (OBJNR).
Pass OBJNR value in COBRB table to get KOSTL value.
Compare both the value & you can give the error message.
Give these tables, fields & user exits to ABAP people. They can form the correct logic.
Incorporate both the logic.
Regards,
Maheswaran.

Default Settlement Rule of PM Maintenance Order

Hi,
While creation of settlement rule on Maintenance Order, Option appears of default settlement rule. Whenever i select that option on Settlement Rule definition screen, two rows appears for the same Cost reciever automatically ( One for Full settlement and second for Periodical Settlement) But i only want Full settlement option to appear on screen in this scenario. Can anybody pin point the root cause and share the solution of it.

hi
while defining the settlement profile specify CTR as default settlement receiver and check ,and also make the settlement profile mandatory for order release,
regards
thyagarajan

Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

Hello,
I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L. However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

Re: cProject settlement rule defaulting as PSG during transfer.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for