Re: Depth of Evaluation for Standard Evaluation Paths (Bottom Up Approach)

Hi All,
We are facing a unique issue when using OOSP and defining evaluation path. for e.g. we used the standard SBESX (Staff assignments along Organizational structure). We also defined the following fields to test the Org structure results for a user's structural authorization on what he/she can see (e.g. Org unit(O), Positions(S), Users(P))
1. Object Type = O
2. Evalutaion Path = SBESX
3. Status vector = 12345
4. Depth (D) = 5 (which defaults to 1 automatically if we set the sign field to -(negative) for Bottom-up approach (displaying org structure bottom to up)
5. Function Module = RH_GET_ORG_ASSIGNMENT
6. Key Date = D
The issue we have is for the above settings on OOSP Depth field defaults to 1 everytime we use the Bottom up approach (i.e setting the Sign field to - (negative)). Has anyone encountered the above problem with the depth field? Let us know if you had any fix or you had to escalate this to SAP?
Best regards,
-Murali

S0003562672 wrote:>
> hi murali,
>
> I cannot give you an answer on why exactly the depth filed is defaulting to 1 when using the negative in the sign fields (T77PR-SSIGN).  but can you perhaps explain what you're trying to accomplish with your structural profile.  in that case, maybe I/we can figure out a way to circumvent the use of the sign field...
>
> Edited by: Dimitri van Heumen on Mar 19, 2008 2:24 PM
> (typing errors)
Thanks for your reply Dimitri.
Here is what we are trying to acheive with the Org structure below:
                                                                      O - 00001004
                                                                        S - 00000253
                                  O - 00001005                                                O - 00001006
                                       S – 00000251 hradmin1                               S – 00000256 essuser2 (120)
                                       S - 00000252
               O - 00001007                   O - 00001008                     O - 00001009          O - 00001010
               S - 00000257                     S - 00000259                     S - 00000260(121)    S - 00000254 (122)
               S – 00000258  essuser1                                                                            S – 0000255 hradmin2(114)
Position # 00000255 (far right down below in the above Org structure) is the HR Specialist for (Org #00001006 and Org #00001009).  Employee # 114 (far right bottom) has been hired into this position 255. They should be able to see Employees 120, 121, 122 and themselves(114).
We have created a structural profile for the user hradmin2(114) and attached him to a role which has ess/mss functionality. We are trying to use the evaluation path SBESX to test what org units, postions and users this user hradmin2(114) can see which should meet the requirement stated above that he should see 120,121,122 and 114 themselves.
So from the Org structure above it is a bottom up scenerio where hradmin2 must see org units 00001010, 00001009 and 00001006 and whenever we set the sign field to -ve (bottom up approach of displaying org structure) and depth of lets say 4 it automatically defaluts to 1 and when we check hradmin2 authorization profile in oosb we only see org unit 00001010 being displayed and not the org units above it for this bottom up approach.
Are you aware of any methods to acheive this for the org structure above?
Thanks
-Murali
Edited by: Murali Sripadam on Mar 19, 2008 1:47 PM

Similar Messages

  • MSS Team View evaluation path for non chief positions (s-s)

    Hello,
    We have a problem with display of employees under non chief manager - reporting managers (connection A002). In our organization we have line managers and under them team managers who are leading team of employees. Those managers want to see their employees under MSS Team View iView.
    I have checked forum posts and try to create correct evaluation path but i didn't get results yet. I have created 2 evaluation paths:
    Z_MANG (copy of SAP_MANG):
    10 *     B 008      S
    20 S    B 002      S
    30 US  A 208 P
    Z_S-S (copy of MSSDIREC):
    10 S  A 002     S
    20 S  A 008     P
    30 S  A 008     US
    I also included them into rules so:
    Root rule (rule 1) - Z_MANG
    Target rule (rule 3) - Z_S-S
    I have also done customizing under Object and Data provider and if I choose standard evaluation paths (e.g. SAP_MANG and MSSDIREC), I get employees shown - if I give manager a hat (A012 connection).
    Could you please help me with advice, where am I wrong? I think that first evaluation path (Z_MANG) is ok and it finds non chief manager, maybe is a problem with second one that don't show employees?
    Thank you for answers in advance.
    Best regards,
    David

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • Evaluation Path for Appraisal docs

    Hi  Friends-    
    These  FMs  using  such  Evaluation Paths  creating  Appraisal docs  for  Given ' Org Unit '   'O'
    1) HRHAP_DOCUMENT_PREP_ORG                      using   'BOSSORG' ,
    2) HRHAP_PREP_READ_ORG_STRUCTURE         using   'HAP_ORG',
    3) STRUCTURE_BUILD_MULTIPLE_ROOTS          using the same 'HAP_ORG'
    What  Evaluation Path i shd  pass in these FMs   to  create Appraisal docs  for  Given  Employees ' Perner'   ?
    These all FM  used in one standard Report  RHXHAP_APP_DOC_PREPARE    which i need to copy and enhance for pernr also ...
    Or is there  Standard FMs  are there which creates  Appraisal docs based on Employees 'P' ?
    Pls share your inputs on this.
    Regards
    Meeta

    ok

  • Evaluation Path for Position to Position Reporting Structure

    Hello Everyone,
    We currently have a position to position reporting structure in place.  WIth this being said, not every supervisor in our organization is the chief of a team.  I am trying to create an evaluation path that will look at a position, then go up to get the positions report to position (but not go up any further), then go down to get the positions that report to the supervisor.  This will allow us to start with a position, then return all the positions that the report to position has.  In essence this will allow us to start with a position and get the team (though we don't have an org unit for the team).  I am trying to do this for the Team Calendar in ESS. 
    Below is what I have.  The problem is with the depth, if I enter a 2, then it is not getting the lateral positions, but if I enter a 3, then it goes up to another level and gets an additional supervisor (which I do not want).
    S     A     002     Reports (line) to     2     S
    S     B     002     Is line supervisor of     1     S
    S     A     008     Holder     3     P
    Has anyone developed and Evaluation Path that does this (gets a positions team without having an org unit) and can offer assistance?
    Best Regards,
    Scott

    My first suggestion was either use Bottoms-up approach or top-down dont use both..like either use either of below
    S A 002 Reports (line) or
    S B 002 Is line supervisor
    but figured u will still have depth issues..so therefore
    you cld experiment like below..i understood your requirement, and i am suggesting this totally off-hand thats on top of my head..as i said experiement doing this way..
    say you have four levels  why dont you use different evalutaion path to link them between each level..
    say 1st to 2nd (reports to A002)
          2nd to 3rd (subordinate to A005)
          3rd to 4th/4th to 3rd (Is line supervisor B 002 )etc
    this way you will not have the depth issue as each one is diffeent Ev path..
    ...oops i can see people laughing at this solution..but well..i tried!

  • SAP_MANG Evaluation Path not working for MSS after ECC6 Upgrade

    Hello All,
    We are upgrading to ECC6 and still using an older version of the java/HTMLB MSS Business Package. We are seeing strange results in the vacancy request overview iview (team viewer like component)  which is using a view driven by SAP_MANG Evaluation Path.
    SAP_MANG looks like this...
    10 * B 008 * S
    20 S A 012 * O
    30 US A 208 * P
    Our View is ZRCPOS using...
    Eval Path - SAP_MANG
    Eval Objects - O_NACH_S
    Initial Evaluation Depth - 3
    Column Group - ZRC_VACREQ_OV
    Header Type - RC_VAC_HEADER
    The iview is meant for position maintenance and should show a dropdown of orgs. When an org is selected a list of positions/holders is shown to modify, delimit, etc. The problem is that in the dropdown "Select organizational unit to display positions" instead of...
    Test Org 1
    Test Org 2
    We have...
    Test User1
    Test Org 1
    Test Org 2
    ...so the user us shown as an org. Right off I suspected the upgrade to MSS 60.1.22 (the newest version of the old Business Package) so I installed the older versions of the components and the actually still worked but also showed this condition. So I have ruled out the java side as a source of the problem.
    Looking at HRP1001 I see the following relationships among suspect objects.
    Object P 1234567 to Object S 9876543 via B008
    Object S 1234567 to Object O 9876543 via A012
    no relationships US to P via A208
    Given the Eval Path above, does anyone have any idea why this would display this way or have a suggested approach to solve.
    Thanks,
    Doug

    >
    Doug Steckel wrote:
    > Hi Ranganath,
    >
    > Thanks for the quick reply. Yes the Skip flag is set on relationships 10 and 30. I would also think that would prevent this but it is not.
    >
    > Thanks,
    > Doug
    not all relationships represent physical data records in the database.  some are derived and without looking at the system, I believe the US 208 to P is a derived relationship.
    Are you sure all the users you are testing with have a proper sy-uname setup for all respective pernrs in PA0105?

  • Evalution path for PFAL to handle concurrent employee asignment.

    Hello,
    While using PFAL to push any object of type 'P'(employee), the standard process is creating IDoc segments only for the given employee, But how is it possible to create IDoc segments for its other assignments also?
    I need to create IDoc segments of all the assignments for the employee given in PFAL selection screen.
    Is there any evalution path (relating to 'CP') could help?
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Parthasarathi Mohanty on Jun 1, 2011 1:01 PM

    Hi,
    Thanks,
    A209 evaluation path adds the IDoc segment of the Central Person (CP) related to the 'P'.
    I need the IDoc segments of all the assignments of the P.
    For e.g: The 'P' entered in the selection screen of PFAL has 3 assignments with a single CP.
    I need the IDoc segments to be created for all the 3 assignments. (Segments related to CP not required)

  • Help to evaluation path for ESS

    Hi
    I have to make a report/list in the portal, where an employee can see i.e. the birthday of all the colleagues directly under the employees manager.
    Is there a standard evaluation path for this ? Or can someone point me in the right direction (and remember I am new to evaluation paths)
    Thanks
    /Jakob

    Hi Siddharth 
    Thank you for your reply.
    I have created the evaluation path as you described, but when I test it using PPSS, with the following data :
                                                                                    Objekttype           P   Person                                               
    ObjektID             00032422      ib                                         
    Betegnelse           ib, ibsen                                                                               
    Evalueringsvej       Z_ess_co  Test af at finde hvilke objekter der er løn på t
                                                                                    Behandlingsperiode   28.09.2008  til  31.12.9999                                                                               
    Where the person "00032422" is part of an organization with several employees. I was expecting a list of employees directly under the manager of employee "00032422".
    Anything I have misunderstood or done wrong?
    Thanks
    /Jakob

  • T-code of the window where it asks for evaluation path.

    Hi,
    I want the T-code of that window where it asks for evaluation path. I want to generate the report in OM

    Hi,
    If you are creating repoert through HIS tool, you can use OODS T code to declare the Evaluation path.
    Tomesh

  • Evaluation path for team calender in MSS

    Hi Experts,
    I need to configure an evaluation path as follows.
    1.  A manager  M1 belongs to org unit O1. He manages Org unit O2.
    2.  Org unit O2 reports to O1. similarly O3 also reports to O1.
    3.  Now I need to develop a evaluation path in which, M1 should have visibility to all employees from both O2 and O3 in his MSS..
    I have tried out many combinations with A002 and B002 relationships. but it not working.
    So could you help me to build this evaluation path.
    Thanks
    Sameer

    there are standard evaluation paths available which should fulfil thsi requirement
    Check SAP_MANG
    SBESX
    MSSDIREC
    You can use report report RHSTRU00, to check your own path

  • Evaluation Paths for Audit Requirements

    Hi,
    For requirements, which belong to the "Subrequirements" requirements category, is "A500" typically the value that one would specify for this?
    Thank you,
    Eric

    Yesterday, I defined the evaluation path as you suggested. I am still seeing problems, so I assume that I must have something misconfigured or unconfigured somewhere else. This implies that I'm probably not done bothering the forum yet....
    As far as getting the "SC" requirement selection into 4.72, it is not much of an issue for me, since we are supposed to be upgrading fairly soon, and for testing purposes, I should be able to use an eval path. I might still post an OSS message, as you suggest.
    One thing that would be nice would be a complete "changelog" to view somewhere. I can see the release notes for my version in the implementation guide, but it would be nice to see the release notes for all versions. This would allow someone to make a quick determination about what became available and when. If such a changelog already exists, can you tell me where to access it?
    Thanks again for your help, Joachim.
    Best,
      Eric

  • Evaluation path for B002 - OOAW

    Hi
    I'm creating a evaluation path for fetching all reports under a line manager. Can someone please throw light on how to configure thie in OOAW. It works fine SAP_MANG, I tried to modify but iam not able to get this.
    - Aravind

    Hi,
    B002 is normally used as an O-O relationship.  If you look at evaluation path O-S-P in OOAW.  You will see how it is used here.
    O-S-P might actually meet your requirement.
    let me know.
    thanks.
    JB

  • Evaluation Path for Direct Reports only

    Hi
    We have written an evaluation path to return direct reports for a given manager (to use in an Adobe Interactive form). We get the correct employees returned, but also the manger himself. Ideally we want a list of names that doesn't include him.
    Here's our path:
    No      Obj      A/B     Rel     Rel name         Priority      Rel Obj Type    Skip
    10       US       B       008     Holder                 *                   S  
    20       P         B       008     Holder                 *                   S
    30       S         A       012     Manages             *                   O
    40       O         B       003     Incorporates        *                   S
    50       S         A       008     Holder                 *                   P      
    What change should we make to not include the manager in the returned set?
    Thanks
    Trish

    Hello,
    Sorry but you can't.
    SAP considers that Manager is not assigned to his own org unit (A012 not equal to A008).
    I had the same issue and i had to create 2 evaluations path :
       - one to get the list of employee (manager include)
       - one to get the manager only
    and exclude the second one in the report.
    Edited by: Cédric LEFRANCOIS on Dec 21, 2009 11:47 AM

  • Custom Relationship or Evaluation Path needed for 'Time Admin' Scenario

    Hello all Gurus,
    I am looking for some direction on a scenario that I am trying to accomplish.
    The position u201CLEAD Solutions Architectu201D, in the example below, is going to be what we will classify as a Time administrator.  The function on this Time Admin will to be to correct an employeeu2019s punch exceptions via a portal application (ITC).  But, my issue is that I need this user/position to be able to view all organizations and their people down below.
    I have tried creating a custom evaluation path and I can get it to work down to the ORG, but not to the employee.
    Also, I have created an ABAP program and routine to tie to a custom relationship, but when I attempt assign the new program, the program name disappears after clicking on new entry (T77EV-PROGR).
    EXAMPLE
    IT Infrastructure          O(rganization)
                        Lead Solutions Architect     S    (TIME ADMIN)          
         Director, IT Infrastructure     S          
         Operations Services          O(rganization)          Below Organization 'IT Infrastructure'
              Senior Support Specialist                          S     
              Senior Operations Coordinator     S     
              Manager, Operations Services     S     
              Intern, IT Intern                          S     
              Operations Servies Analyst     S     
              Customer Support Services     O(rganization)  Below Organization 'Operations Services'
                   Support Specialist     S
                   Support Specialist     S
                   Support Specialist     S
    END
    Any advice or direction on this would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Mike

    Hello Brad,
    Thank you for your response. Here is the requested information.
    1) Is it a customer ITC app in the portal?
    a) This is SAPs iTime Clock for punch edits
    2) Are you using structural auth's ? also have you checked to make sure the time admin user has the right auth's to see people?
    a) We do use Structural auth and I have already opened that orgranization up to my test Time Admin
    3) Post the eval path you have so far.
    10     US     B     008     Holder      *      S
    20     P     B     008     Holder      *      S
    30     S     A     003     Belongs to      *      O
    40     O     B     003     Incorporates      *      *
    Appreciate your help on this,
    Mike

  • Evaluation Path for View of Organizational Structure

    Hi all,
    I am trying to define new VIEWID using EVPATH which would do the following filtering (by using f.m. HRWPC_GET_NAV_SUBTREE): giving org.unit number, it would return employees of current org unit and in case that there are some sub org units  which dont have the boss also all employees of those org units and in case that the sub org. unit have the boss only the boss.
    I saw there is Evaluation path SBES, which shows me the employees of given org unit, or SBESX which gives all including suborgs, but I cannot find Ev. path which will do more complicated conditions.
    I can see EVPATH only on T778A table with short description, is there any other way to see them with more details?
    Thank you and best regards,
    Anna

    Hi Anna,
    You will find all the existing eval paths in table T778A itself.
    I am not sure if you have seen the individual maintenance too.
    You can also create your own eval paths acc to your requirement too.
    But as far as i know all the things wrt to eval paths can be managed there itself
    Hope it helps!
    Regards,
    SR

  • Evaluation path for MSS role

    Hi all,
    Is there a way to assign MSS role dynamically to an employee if he has employees reporting to him?
    We have got to know that this can be achieved by configuring some evaluation path.
    Any pointers would be appreciated!
    TIA!

    Diana,
    Where actually do you assign the roles ,is it in the portal or you have a CUA system where all the role maintenance is done over there.if second one is true you can write a custom program and assign the role by checking the direct reportees
    Thanks
    Bala Duvvuri

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to show the dialogs in Indesign?

    hi to all, I tried these script to show the dialogs but it doesn't work at all! $.writeln(app.dialogs.length); app.dialogs.everyItem().destroy(); //for(var i=0;i<app.dialogs.length;i++) //     app.dialogs[i].destroy();               //These also i tr

  • Linking Soundtrack Pro to audio files stored on an external drive

    FCP user but using SP for the first time. I have the large sized audio files stored on an external drive which at the moment I can't access from within SP. Just wondering the best way to link to the audio files?

  • Procedure after Automatic Payment it run.

    Dear all, Please suggest what is the procedure after automatic payment is run. what is mostly done. Thanks Nishan

  • Sdm tool

    hi, any body help me on the sdm toool ? 1) how the process of applying patches thru sdm tool , there is any  tool other than sdm? - send me with detailed with process, and also format of the file like abc.sca , so plz 2) in real time - which type of

  • Do you know how to record yourself doing something?

    Hello, do you know how to record yourself doing something, like teaching a craft, or ranting about something so it can be uploaded to a video provider... from an iMac? Thanks if so! <Re-Titled By Host>