Re: Error Hitting while doing f-32
Hi Team,
when i am doing the f-32 customer clearing i was getting one information message like the company is not linking in to43g table.I had checked the tollerence limit still i am getting the same information message.Please do the need full.
Regards,
suma.
Hi Suma gaaru
pls give me ur mail id i will send u some of the real time docs and tickets
[email protected]
add me
Similar Messages
-
Error Message while doing Order CLSD
Hi,
I am getting error message while doing Order CLSD...
Error Msg: Invalid cost element(XXXX) for reservation item 010.
please suggest me...how to solve this issue.
regards,
Venkatesan AnandanHi Venkatesan,
I had replied and asked for one clarrification and to check same at your end.
Is your Cost Element mapping done with cost cost center used in order settlement rule.
Also check for Material Master Change document for Valuation Class change and revert back in this thread. -
Error message while doing MIGO.
Hi,
I am getting error message while doing MIGO. Can some one help me out in this issue.
Consolidated companies 0 and 5686 are different
Message no. F5 080
Diagnosis
The number of the affiliated company must be clear for the selected document type for all line items. In this case at least two different companies or a company in connection with a business partner who does not belong to a company are stated.
Procedure
If you selected the correct accounts, you must enter the document with a document type that allows cross-company posting. Otherwise, please correct the entered account.
Thanks in Advance,
SubhajoCheck Fi customizing in OBA7.
As you mentioned MIGO, I assume you are doing goods receipt, so you use document type WE.
Within WE you must not have selected the field inter-company posting .
Best you place the cursor into this field and press F1 for detailed explanation, -
Errors encountered while doing BCC Full deployment in the Applying phase
Errors encountered while doing BCC Full deployment in the Applying phase. The stack trace is as below:-
**** Warning Fri Aug 02 09:43:24 BST 2013 1375433004207 /atg/epub/PublishingRepository Using default JDBC type for: project:tar814 could not find this column in the table's meta data
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574278 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Run first apply phase: true
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574279 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Switch switchable CA datasources:
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574279 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer isDeploymentRollback(): false
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574284 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Current Target live datasource name: DataSourceA
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574285 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer CA switching datasource: /atg/commerce/jdbc/ProductCatalogSwitchingDataSource_production
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574285 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Current live datasource name: DataSourceB
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574285 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Current offline datasource name: DataSourceA
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574286 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer The current CA live datasource is pointing at the Target offline datasource. No CA switch necessary.
**** debug Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574287 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer Switchable CA datasources switched.
**** info Fri Aug 02 09:52:54 BST 2013 1375433574307 /atg/epub/DeploymentServer DirectSQLReplicationAdapter: Starting FIRST phase data transfer.
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver SQL Statement Failed: [++ReplicationSQL++]
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver INSERT
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver INTO ndcatalog2.extn_block_link
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver (
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver renderer_id,
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver link,
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver block_id
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver )
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver SELECT
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver t1.renderer_id,
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver t1.link,
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver t1.block_id
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver FROM
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver extn_block_link t1,
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver extn_block t2
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver WHERE t2.asset_version =
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver ( SELECT MAX ( asset_version )
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver FROM extn_block
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver WHERE
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver (
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver (
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver checkin_date <= ?
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver )
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver )
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND branch_id = ?
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND block_id = t2.block_id
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver )
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND t2.version_deleted = ?
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND t2.branch_id = ?
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND t1.asset_version = t2.asset_version
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver AND t1.block_id = t2.block_id
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver -- Parameters --
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver p[1] = {pd: checkin_date} 2013-07-30 10:23:57.867 (java.sql.Timestamp)
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver p[2] = {pd: branch_id} 10500 (java.lang.String)
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver p[3] = {pd: version_deleted} false (java.lang.Boolean)
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver p[4] = {pd: branch_id} 10500 (java.lang.String)
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver [--ReplicationSQL--]
**** Error Fri Aug 02 09:53:12 BST 2013 1375433592737 /com/screwfix/content/block/BlockRepository-ver java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00904: "RENDERER_ID": invalid identifier
Please note that we are migrating from ATG 2007 to ATG 10.0.1...Also we are doing deployment in this new environment for the first time only.
Thanks a lot
PijushHi Pijush,
The exception towards the end of the stack trace says the RENDERER_ID is an invalid identifier. the Oracle error 00904 indicates the column name must be wrong. Can you verify the repostiory xml on the BlockRepository and check the column name.
Regards,
Srikanth -
What are the accounts that will hit while doing subcontracting process
What are the accounts that will hit while doing subcontracting process?
Hi Raj,
In Case of Sub contract
While doing Transfer Posting (Providing material to vendor) in MB1B or ME2O only Material document will be generated. No Accounting Document will be generated.
While Receiving the Finished / Semifinished material both Material and Accounting documents will get generated and the accounting entries will be as under
1. Stock Account (finished Account) BSX - Debits
2. GR/IR clearing Account WRX - Credits
3. Change in Stock Account BSV - Credits
4. Processing Charges/Sub Contract Charges FRL - Debits
5. Stock Account (Raw Material) BSX - Credits
6. consumption from stock of material provided to vendor GBB(VBO) - Debits
bye
Sridhar Thota -
HI Guys
I created Order and while doing PGI error message comes
Error message is:
Account 892000 requires an assignment to a CO object
Message no. KI235
Diagnosis
You have not defined a CO account assignment for an account that is relevant to cost accounting.
System Response
Account 892000 is defined as a cost element.
This means that you must always specify a CO account assignment.
Procedure
Enter one of the following CO account assignments
Order
Cost center / cost center/ activity type
Sales order item (for a project or cost relevant)
Project / WBS element
Cost object (Process manufacturing)
Network/ Network activities
Business process
Profitability segment
Real estate object
The posting row affected is 000, account 892000.
Help me in this issue ...as early as possibleHello,
sales order items are not in all cases available as account assignment
object, this is only the case if it is an order with make-to-order
production (VBAP-KZVBR='E').
If the sales order item itself is a co-object (VBAP-KZVBR='E'), the
cost and revenues can be carried on the position itself and the field
VBAP-OBJNR contains the number of the co-object. Please check this for
your case.
Even if the VBAP-KZVBR is set to 'E', but if the field VBAP-OBJNR is
blank, the order cannot be the accounting object in KB21N - you should
rather use the receiving order for the activity allocation.
You can check this in KB21N via the F4-help: if the sales order item
is not displayed here, it's is not considered as valid account assigment
object.
I hope this information will help to clarify the issue.
Regards
Claudia -
USER IS GETTING ERROR MESSAGE WHILE DOING PM ORDER COLLECTIVE CONFIRMATION
Dear,
i have query from my client that user is getting error message " no status object is available for cre o/o/o while doing pm order confirmation. My client is using sap MRS . I Recommend the client to run program ZKBEDREP in se38 and still they are facing the same error.Can any body help me in solving this.Hi,
Please see if this thread helps
System status not avilable for one of the component - Conf. can't be done
Regards, -
Error message while doing data migration
Hi all
When im doing data migration for material master through Z transaction ,it is updating global DIR documents for material while doing this ,im getting the error and the transaction is stopped intermediately the error message is CHANGE MASTER STATUS DOES NOT ALLOW CHANGES no error message number.
Kindly sujjest where is that error is coming,it would be very helpfulIt seems you are using engineering change management and your change number's status is not proper (CC01, CC02, CC03; table AENR).
Configuration of the status is in T419S (use SM30 + T419S) - but I guess the problem is about your change number not about config...
How your Z-program is working, we don't know; contact the responsible functional/technical consultants.
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Aug 19, 2011 8:41 AM -
Dear Experts,
We are facing some "entern error" while doing MIGO of any PO. Also their is no message type and no. It's just say entern error.
Please guide us in this topic.
What I feel is someone has created this error message manually. So please guide us where do can we change this message into no message type.
Thanks and Regards
Raghav PuranikHi Raghav,
Please check it there is any user exist activated in your MIGO transaction. If you were coded any exit it will populate such a message.
Also, Let me know your message details,
Whether it is standard message or customized by business?
Please double click it on your error message and check it message application area..
Go to Transaction code SMOD - and deactivate your exit data if used anything.
Thanks,
Thiru -
Error message while doing the Vendor Clearing
Dear Team,
I am encountering an issue while doing the Vendor clearing.I am nullifying the Vendor down payment against to RE document through residual posting system is showing the message like the below.
No additional posting to asset
Message no. AA 444
Diagnosis
A downpayment was already posted to the asset 80567 0 in the currently displayed document. Additional posting to the same asset in this document is not possible for technical reasons.
Procedure
Combine the two downpayments into one.
Please kindly advice.The concern Down payment is showing under open item in FBL1N.Kindly advice how to proceed further.
Thanks for the consideration.
Regards,
Suma.Hi Suma,
First clear Down payment with using of F-54 & next you can clear normal OI.
Rgds
SumaMani -
Error encountered while doing on-demand refresh of Power BI report
When I try to manually refresh a PowerBI excel that has been uploaded on to SharePoint, I get this error.
"OnPremise error: Sorry, you don't have permissions to retrieve data for this data connection. Request access from your Power BI admin. An error occurred while processing table 'Reference Data'. The current operation was cancelled because another
operation in the transaction failed. "
It has been verified to us that the data management gateway has been approved and we have made sure that the credentials and the database details to connect to the On-Prem instance are the same as specified.
THe correlation ID is 8eb7c217-f62d-4137-a648-5df57937058ethe error is talking about the permissions to the data source, in the PBI admin center, per data source you need to specify who (O365 user) can access it, maybe this is the source of your problem?
GALROY -
Error message while doing delivery
I am getting an following message while doing delivery
Material 20000019 doesnot exist in storage location DLPT 2120
Storage location was deleted since material was not maintained correctly
No Schdule line is due for delibery upto the selected date
Please guide me with the solution.Dear Sanjay,
First of all, I would like to suggest to check the "Organizational Level" data, with which Material was created in T. Code: MM01.
Check the "Plant", along with "Sales Org" and "Dist. Chnl" in T. Code: MM02
Also, check the "Strorage Location" in T. Code: MM02
Select the Views: Sales: General Plant data/storage location and then go to organizational elements and enter the plant and storage location, save it.
Also, on to the same screen up there, in Menu-Bar:
Enviornment --> Sock Overview
It will lead you to Screen: MMBE
Check Stock for the Material.
Best Regards,
Amit
Note: I am a bit confuse with your statement:
Storage location was deleted since material was not maintained correctly
Do you mean that, You have removed "Strorage Location - DLPT 2120" from the Material Master "20000019"? -
Hi
I am encountering the error M8035 (" No Suitable Items found for PO ") while I am doing MIRO for the 1st time against service POs (item cat - D) in a company code.
in OMSY the period opened for the company code is : Current 06 2014 previous 05 2014
This was done because Go Live date for the new company code is 01.06.2014.
I am doing test in the test client now.
I have created a vendor on today's date
I have created a service PO on today's date (GR, GR Bsd IV, IR, Serv Bsd IV - these indicators are marked in the PO)
I have created service entry sheet on today's date (acc assignment - K, G/L a/c was determined from the Material Group maintained in the PO)
I have accepted the service entry sheet on 04.05.2014 (FI doc posted against the matl doc - KBS to WRX on 04.05.2014)
I am trying to do the MIRO in the same company code on 04.05.2014.
While I am putting the PO and its line item in MIRO item and pressing enter system shows the above info msg and nothings is appearing in MIRO item.
I have tried to do MIRO against service entry sheet also - same things happened.
I have tried selecting Goods Service Item+planned del cost in MIRO - nothing changed.
I have tried posting MIRO against a non service PO (acc assgnment K, Item cat - BLANK) after doing MIGO in the same company code in the same date- PO is appearing in that case.
FI people are able to post FB60 manually for the vendor I am using in the PO - so there is no problem in the vendor also.
I have gone through the scn post related with the topic, unfortunately none of them solved my problem.
Please help
Thanks
Sanjib...Can you post a screen shot for PO history ?
Regards
Dev -
Intercompany PO process, Error F5165 while doing PGI in outbound delivery
Hi all,
I am doing an inter-company PO with delivery & billing process.
i have configured the one step procedure in the STO config so that the movement type triggered while PGI in delivery will be 645.
But when i do the PGI (Post Goods Issue) in the outbound delivery, i am getting an error message no: F5165 "company code ' ' not defined".
I have checked the settings like both the supplying site & receiving site have company codes & sales orgs assigned in respective companies.
I am not sure why this error F5165 is coming.
how to identify what is the issue.
Please help.
regards,
kumarThe SAP Note which you referred is consulting note.
Check the fields as I mentioned in my previous post
- company code (T001K-BUKRS) or
- valuation area (T001W-BWKEY).
- may be field WERKS is not maintained in the preceding document (order) for the corresponding delivery item. As a result, the system does not find a valuation area in table T001W as well
So, in case to avoid this error your config should have these table-field combination which you are used transaction data
Table-Field
Table-desc
Field-desc
T001K-BUKRS
T001K-Valuation area
BUKRS-Company Code
T001W-BWKEY
T001W-Plants/Branches
BWKEY-Valuation Area
T001W-WERKS
T001W-Plants/Branches
WERKS-Plant
Regards
JP -
Error encountered while doing Migration from WLS 8.1 to WLS 10.0
Hello All ,
We are trying to do a WLS migrate(8.1 to 10.0) for a java/j2ee based application. We did not face any issues while compling application code (using jdk 1.5 & weblogic.jar of WLS 10.0) but while running the ant build script , we encountered an error while executing below part
Line: -----
1 <java classname="weblogic.appc" fork="true" maxmemory="${appc.java.maxmemory}" failonerror="true">
2 <classpath>
3 <pathelement path="${project.classpath}"/>
4 </classpath>
5
6 <jvmarg line="${appc.java.options} -Djava.io.tmpdir=${appc.tmp.dir}"/>
7
8 <arg line="-compiler ${appc.compiler} -output ${_appc.output}
9 -classpath ${_appc.classpath}
10 ${bmwslc.param.options}
11 ${appc.additional.options}
12 ${_appc.input}" />
13 </java>
Line: -----
Following is the error , which we encountered
Line: -----
# [java] Usage: java weblogic.appc [options] <ear, jar, war or rar file or directory>
# [java] where options include:
# [java] -help Print the standard usage message.
# [java] -version Print version information.
# [java] -output <file> Specifies an alternate output archive or
# [java] directory. If not set, output will be
# [java] placed in the source archive or directory.
# [java] -plan <file> Specifies an optional deployment plan.
# [java] -forceGeneration Force generation of EJB and JSP classes.
# [java] Without this flag the classes may not be
# [java] regenerated if it is determined to be
# [java] unnecessary.
# [java] -quiet Turns off output except for errors
# [java] -lineNumbers Add JSP line numbers to generated class
# [java] files to aid in debugging.
# [java] -library <file> Comma-separated list of libraries. Each
# [java] library may optionally set its name and
# [java] versions, if not already set in its
# [java] manifest, using the following syntax: <file>
# [java] [@name=<string>@libspecver=<version>
# [java] @libimplver=<version|string>]
# [java] -librarydir <dir> Registers all files in specified directory
# [java] as libraries.
# [java] -writeInferredDescriptors Write out the descriptors with inferred
# [java] information including annotations.
# [java] -keepgenerated Keep the generated .java files.
# [java] -verbose Compile with verbose output.
# [java] -classpath <path> Classpath to use.
# [java] -source <source> Source version.
# [java] -target <target> Target version.
# [java] -advanced Print advanced usage options.
# [java] <May 18, 2010 12:36:19 PM CEST> <Error> <J2EE> <BEA-160187> <weblogic.appc failed to compile your application. Recompile with the -verbose option for more details. Please see the error message(s) below.>
# [java] [J2EE:160128]ERROR: Incorrect appc command-line. Too many arguments were given. The command-line only takes a single argument, the source file, in addition to the supported options.
Line: -----
All the arguments looks correct to me while debugging . here is the summary of echo statements
${appc.additional.options} =""
${bmwslc.param.options} ="-forceGeneration"
${_appc.input}="test_ear-generic.ear"
I am dumb struck at this point
Please suggest any other thoughts , which you have in mind .
Thanks in advance !
Regards
ShobitProbably too late for an answer but I try,
We are not able to build our J2EE 1.4 application with weblo 10, we have to build them with weblo 8 which contains the xdoclet. then we deploy it in WL10. then sometimes we have to fix some build constraints that WL10 doesn't allow anymore.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Is it necessary to create a Billing Plan for the Service Contracts
Hi All, Is it necessary to create a billing plan for the service contracts. My requirement. In CRM 7.0, we created a service contract. For the item in that service contract there is a Billing Plan tab. In that tab we have the dates for Period
-
Error 4450 whilst burning playlist,how can i fix this?
constant error 4450 when burning playlists in itunes. Running on windows XP. How can i fix this ?
-
Remembering an undefined number of arrays.
I have an undefined number of arrays (usually 3-5, but can be different) which i need to 'remember' within a LabVIEW VI. Each array may need to be called up in the future for a variety of things, or even overwritten. I am currently storing the defaul
-
How To Maximize Frame in my Freeze Window
Hi All, I have a freeze window sample. http://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=68056:1 WS: dev_ws_100 login: test01 passwd: abc123 How do I maximize the width and height so that the window fits in the monitor screen? I tried screasing the with to 1000 x
-
Hi, When I am tryin to change object type in CN41N it is giving ABAP dump with funtion "AC_system_flush" and this function is calling another function "AC_FLUSH_CALL", Moreover when I checked "AC_FLUSH_CALL" got introduction statement "NO DIRECT CALL