Re: (forte-users) Anyone used Semaphors in Forte ?

Jean-Paul,
I'm not sure what behaviour you are trying to implement with semaphores.
In Forté, the Mutex type is an implementation of a mutual exclusion
semaphore.
If that's all you need, then using Mutex would be the smartest way to
implement a semaphore.
Is that sufficient or are you looking for some other semaphore flavor?
Daniel Désy
BORN.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Paul Gabrielli" <Jean-Paul.Gabriellisema.fr>
To: "000Forte-Users" <forte-userslists.xpedior.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 7:37 AM
Subject: (forte-users) Anyone used Semaphors in Forte ?
Hi,
Looking for the smartest way to implement semaphrs in Forte.
Have you experienced such a use ?
thanks
j-paul gabrielli
sema
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a
new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Similar Messages

RE: (forte-users) XML and XSL in Forte

We too (at Viking Freight) would also be very interested to see if anybody
has produced such a useful series of classes...
Frank Lees, Developer
-----Original Message-----
From: Amin, Kamran [mailto:kamran.aminframeworkinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2000 12:11 PM
To: 'Forte User'
Subject: (forte-users) XML and XSL in Forte
Has anybody integrated an XSL parser with Forte. I know Forte provides us
with an XML parser but that does not help with parsing XSL. There a lot of
parsers written in JAVA but that will not integrate well with Forte. We
need something that will be easy to integrate with Forte. This parser will
take our XML and XSL to give us a result set. If anybody can comment on the
subject or share some information I would appreciate it.
thanks in advance.
ka
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.sageit.com

Re: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?

We are making use of interfaces extensively and have never had the
slightest problem. Interfaces do not cause any overhead, since they are
mainly a means to support type checking by the compiler. At run-time the
interface does not appear any more.
Using Forte 3.0.F.2
General wrote:
>
We are embarking on the analysis phase of a large pay/personnel project. =
We have been advised to use interfaces wherever possible, because they =
promote flexibility and reusability. I am fairly well convinced of the =
benefits of using interfaces - they appear to have a lot of advantages, =
and no drawbacks. However, I do wonder whether Forte's implementation of =
interfaces is stable and usable (..it was only introduced in version 3). =
If not, we may be better advised to use standard techniques.
If you have used Forte interfaces I would be interested to hear how you =
got on.
regards,
Tim Kimber--
Dr. Thomas Kunst mailto:[email protected]
sd&m GmbH & Co. KG http://www.sdm.de
software design & management
Thomas-Dehler-Str. 27, 81737 Muenchen, Germany
Tel +49 89 63812-221 Fax -444
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Eric,
You are correct, "manipulate anAIFace object" is not really the correct
way of thinking about what is happening. We are really manipulating an
instance of an object through an interface.
In regards to your other statement: "if Project C needs visibility to B,
it must have B as a supplier Plan." Forte does not force this to happen
when you are using interfaces, which is what causes the problem. Let me
expand on my initial example and add enough detail so that you can create
the problem, which surfaces as a deserialization error:
Project A (No Supplier Plans)
Defines Interfaces: UnitIFace with method GetValue() which returns an
integer
Project B (Contains A as a Supplier Plan)
Defines Class: Unit with attribute _Value as an integer and method
GetValue() which returns _Value. Implements interface UnitIFace.
Project C (Contains A as a Supplier Plan)
Defines Class: Square with method Calculate which accepts an
UnitIFace as an input parameter and returns an integer. This class needs
to be setup as a distributed object so that I service object can be
defined using this class.
Defines Service Object: SqaureSO using the Square class.
Project D (Contains B and C as Supplier Plans)
Defines a class or uses a window that creates an instance of Class B
and passes it to the SquareSO service object that sqaures the value and
returns an integer.
Once this is setup, use the running man to run everything locally. This
will run fine because the dependencies for the local partition end up
including Projects A, B, C and D. Next, run distributed and move the SO
to a remote partition. Now when you execute you will receive a
deserialization error. This happens because the dependencies for the
remote partition only included project A and C. The partition did not
have the necessary information to deserialize the underlying instance of
Class Unit that is referenced through the inteface UnitIFace.
The problem can be resolved by either adding Project B as a supplier plan
to Project C or ensuring that the interface and class are declared in the
same project as I suggested in my previous message. In either case, this
must be resolved by the programmer since Forte is not yet smart enough to
correctly resolve the project dependencies, even though all of the
information needed to establish the correct dependency hierarchy is
available.
Bradley K Wells
[email protected]
Strong Capital Management, Inc
http://www.strong-funds.com/
From: Eric Pereira
Sent: Friday, July 31, 1998 5:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
Bradley,
Thanks for that descriptive note on interfaces.
I do have a observation : in that example you gave us, if Project C
needs visibility to B, it must have B as a supplier Plan. Therefore, I
don't quite understand how partioning classes in C would end up with a
run-time errror in distributed mode, given that B supplies C (something
you've perhaps missed out in your example ?).
Also, is it really possible to "manipulate AIFace objects" ? Interfaces
are'nt really objects, they just help implement a compile-time type
check.
Thanks.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----<snip>------------------
Example:
Project A - Contains AIFace
Project B - Contains Class B which implements AIFace, depends on Project
A
Project C - Contains Classes manipulating AIFace objects, depends on
Project A
This can run fine locally since the local partition has knowledge of all
the classes in A, B, and C. Now as soon as you throw a service object
on
classes on Project C and push them into a remote partition, your
application starts failing because that partition does not contain the
information form project B since there is no dependency on that project.
The partition needs the information from project B though since it
contains the definitions for the actual implementation objects, however
there was no way for Forte to determine that need when it generated the
partition.
This problem is initially eliminated by keeping the interfaces in the
same project as the underlying business objects. But once you start to
have interfaces implemented by multiple classes from multiple projects,
then this won't cover all the bases either. In any case, it is an issue
that you will need to consider at some level when using interfaces.
Good luck!
Bradley K Wells
[email protected]
Strong Capital Management, Inc
http://www.strong-funds.com/
From: "Ngai, Stuart" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 11:10:50 -0400
Subject: RE: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
With version 3G, you can not create an array of interfaces. I believe
Forte
will have that feature in version 4 (which is scheduled to be in
production
at the end of next year).
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Kunst [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 1998 8:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: General
Subject: Re: Interfaces in Forte - has anyone used them?
We are making use of interfaces extensively and have never had the
slightest problem. Interfaces do not cause any overhead, since theyare
mainly a means to support type checking by the compiler. At run-timethe
interface does not appear any more.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Anyone using ObjectBroker with Forte

Hi there,
I am attempting to run the Forte provided BNK1 example. I am
not getting somthing.. My client gets an error(core dump) when I try to
run. I am just tring to run on the unix server where ObjectBroker is
installed.. I am not having any luck and FORTE is not even in the loop
yet.. Can anyone help.. what privilleges do I need?? What env
variables are needed??
Thanks in advance,
Chad

i created the grub package with patches (its all on the wiki http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Reiser4FShowto) and now im waiting for a brave man to test it... 8)

ISkin Revo Users: Anyone use 50 free downloads?

I'm just wondering if anyone has tried this yet?
Just curious.

They are kind of limited, not as good of a selection as iTines or that other one. They require a credit card to signup to get those 50 free downloads. They hold that card number in their records so that it can't be used in the future to open another trial account to get free downloads again.

RE: (forte-users) Does anyone have experience using OracleLarge Objects

hi ,
A few months ago, I tried a oracle stored procedure with a BLOB parameter,
but Forte(3.l2) could not recognize the blob variable. I used oracle 8.0
hth
suma
-----Original Message-----
From: Amin, Kamran [mailto:kamran.aminlendware.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:40 PM
To: 'Forte User Group'
Cc: Magaliff, Bill
Subject: (forte-users) Does anyone have experience using Oracle Large
Objects (LOB's)?
Does anyone have experience using Oracle Large Objects (LOB's) -
specifically the CLOB datatype? Forte supports Oracle LONG's but given that
Oracle is going to phase out that datatype and they're trying to push users
towards CLOB's instead of LONG's, I want to find out if Forte can handle it
and, if so, what we should know about mapping Forte datatypes to the Oracle
CLOB. [Their compatibility matrix for v3.5 indicates suppport under Oracle
8.1.x, and CLOB's were introduced back in 8.0.x - but the word from Forte is
that they currently don't support it.]
thanks in advance.
ka
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Hi,
Did you get any solution to this. If yes, please share.
Thanks,
Tints

Re: [(forte-users) Need help w/SQL to Informix using anarray in WHERE c

Bob.
That syntax isn't know Forte, used Dynamic SQL and coding
it dynamically. And the SQL statement exceed 255 bytes, divide in 2 or more
sentences (NameListCity1, NameListCity2, NalmeListCountry1, ...)
Try with:
NameListCity = 'city1','city2','city3'...
NalmeListCountry = 'country1','country2','country3',...
WHERE
city in (:NameListCity) and
country_code in (:NameListCountry)
Bye.
"Briggs, Bob" <Bob.Briggsmarriott.com> wrote:
I'm trying to invoke a query to Informix to select rows that match any of
the city / country pairs that exist in an array that is passed into the
method. The SQL itself seems to be OK however it appears that Forte is
having a problem in parsing the Select statement when it gets to the WHERE
clause. The resulting exception shows the SQL string formatted properly up
to the WHERE clause which ends like "WHERE city". Does anyone know of a way
to make this type of query work in a single invocation? I'm trying not to
issue multiple queries as would be the case if I used Dynamic SQL and coding
it dynamically with multiple OR statements is not really an option since the
overall length of the SQL statement cannot exceed 256 bytes. I have included
an example of the code below, any insight would be greatly appreciated.
SQL SELECT address1 tnAddress, city tnCity, state tnState, zipcode
tnZipcode,
hotel_code tnHotel_Code, name tnHotelName, product_code
tnProduct_code, loc_type tnLoc_Type,
phone tnPhone, country_code tnCountry
INTO
:po_aboLocator
FROM
Hotel
WHERE
city in :pi_aboNickNameList[*].sCityName and
country_code in :pi_aboNickNameList[*].sCountryCode
ON SESSION getDBSession();
Thank you very much,
Bob
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Bob.
That syntax isn't know Forte, used Dynamic SQL and coding
it dynamically. And the SQL statement exceed 255 bytes, divide in 2 or more
sentences (NameListCity1, NameListCity2, NalmeListCountry1, ...)
Try with:
NameListCity = 'city1','city2','city3'...
NalmeListCountry = 'country1','country2','country3',...
WHERE
city in (:NameListCity) and
country_code in (:NameListCountry)
Bye.
"Briggs, Bob" <Bob.Briggsmarriott.com> wrote:
I'm trying to invoke a query to Informix to select rows that match any of
the city / country pairs that exist in an array that is passed into the
method. The SQL itself seems to be OK however it appears that Forte is
having a problem in parsing the Select statement when it gets to the WHERE
clause. The resulting exception shows the SQL string formatted properly up
to the WHERE clause which ends like "WHERE city". Does anyone know of a way
to make this type of query work in a single invocation? I'm trying not to
issue multiple queries as would be the case if I used Dynamic SQL and coding
it dynamically with multiple OR statements is not really an option since the
overall length of the SQL statement cannot exceed 256 bytes. I have included
an example of the code below, any insight would be greatly appreciated.
SQL SELECT address1 tnAddress, city tnCity, state tnState, zipcode
tnZipcode,
hotel_code tnHotel_Code, name tnHotelName, product_code
tnProduct_code, loc_type tnLoc_Type,
phone tnPhone, country_code tnCountry
INTO
:po_aboLocator
FROM
Hotel
WHERE
city in :pi_aboNickNameList[*].sCityName and
country_code in :pi_aboNickNameList[*].sCountryCode
ON SESSION getDBSession();
Thank you very much,
Bob
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Re: (forte-users) Using IN in a direct SQLstatement.

Hi,
What does the string in myType look like? You should
be careful with ' and \ as they are used by Forte. I
suggest you post a sample of the myType's value.
Regards,
Peter Sham.
--- Rumen Georgiev <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a problem when executing direct SELECT
statement against Oracle 7.4, something like that:
SQL SELECT ..... INTO .... FROM ..... WHERE .....
AND
TYPE IN :myType ON SESSION .......
myType is TextData containing a list of possible
values separated by commas. myType is set at run
time.
When executed through SQL*Plus the result is O.K..
When executed through Forte it doesn't return
anything. It seems that eigther Forte or Oracle
disregards the commas and treats myType as it will
with =,>,<. What makes me think so is that when
myType
holds single value it works. It fails as soon as I
concatenate one more value from the list. Same
happens
when using cursor. I didn't try it with DBSession
methods but I assume the result will be the same. I
can't use EXECUTE EMMEDIATE because I expect result
set(INTO). So far the only way I can think of is a
WHILE loop for every single value from the list.
Any ideas,comments or workarounds?
Thank's in advance.
Rumen
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
[email protected]
=====

rumen, peter,
Database placeholder substitution is only available for atomic value,
ie. myType can only be CI, or NG, or MS.
There are many ways to workaround this limitation, such as defining
your select statement to contain the IN clause before doing the DBprepare.
hope this helps,
linh ...
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Sham [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 1999 5:57 PM
To: Rumen Georgiev; [email protected]
Subject: Re: (forte-users) Using IN in a direct SQL statement.
Hi,
Maybe try this:
myType.setValue('(\'CI\',\'NG\',\'MS\')');
Regards,
Peter Sham.
--- Rumen Georgiev <[email protected]> wrote:
Peter,
I tried a couple of things to no avail. The simplest
one is like this:
myType.SetValue('\'CI\',\'NG\',\'MS\'');
It works if I do
myType.SetValue('\'CI\'');
Same is valid if myType is declared as a String.
Hi,
What does the string in myType look like? Youshould
be careful with ' and \ as they are used by Forte. I
suggest you post a sample of the myType's value.
Regards,
Peter Sham.
--- Rumen Georgiev <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi folks,
I have a problem when executing direct SELECT
statement against Oracle 7.4, something like that:
SQL SELECT ..... INTO .... FROM ..... WHERE .....
AND
TYPE IN :myType ON SESSION .......
myType is TextData containing a list of possible
values separated by commas. myType is set at run
time.
When executed through SQL*Plus the result is O.K..
When executed through Forte it doesn't return
anything. It seems that eigther Forte or Oracle
disregards the commas and treats myType as it will
with =,>,<. What makes me think so is that when
myType
holds single value it works. It fails as soon as I
concatenate one more value from the list. Same
happens
when using cursor. I didn't try it with DBSession
methods but I assume the result will be the same.I
can't use EXECUTE EMMEDIATE because I expectresult
set(INTO). So far the only way I can think of is a
WHILE loop for every single value from the list.
Any ideas,comments or workarounds?
Thank's in advance.
Rumen__________________________________________________
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
[email protected]
=====
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe,
send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Re: (forte-users) Using MouseCursor

The MouseCursor is an ATTRIBUTE not a method so your code have to look like this:
aFieldWidget.MouseCursor = MC_POINTER;
--- J Lejen <j_lejenyahoo.fr> wrote:
Hi everybody.
I would like to use the MouseCursor.
I try
aFieldWidget:FieldWidget=(FieldWidGet) (self.Window)
aFieldWidget.MouseCursor(MC_POINTER)
When I execute this code, I have this error.
"The virtual attribute
DisplayProject.qqds_C_FieldWidget.MouseCursor was used
in a context where a method is expected."
Then, How can I use this method to change the cursor
on a specific window?
Thanks a lot.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
=====
Ronald Celis
ronaldibcweb.com
Forte Consultant
International Business Corporation
http://www.ibcweb.com
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

The MouseCursor is an ATTRIBUTE not a method so your code have to look like this:
aFieldWidget.MouseCursor = MC_POINTER;
--- J Lejen <j_lejenyahoo.fr> wrote:
Hi everybody.
I would like to use the MouseCursor.
I try
aFieldWidget:FieldWidget=(FieldWidGet) (self.Window)
aFieldWidget.MouseCursor(MC_POINTER)
When I execute this code, I have this error.
"The virtual attribute
DisplayProject.qqds_C_FieldWidget.MouseCursor was used
in a context where a method is expected."
Then, How can I use this method to change the cursor
on a specific window?
Thanks a lot.
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
=====
Ronald Celis
ronaldibcweb.com
Forte Consultant
International Business Corporation
http://www.ibcweb.com
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

RE: (forte-users) 3J= 3M new to me error

Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your email but I think it will be interesting for Brenda not me.
It is exactly what I have expected from Forte Support: detailed information
about bugs and workarounds. But what I cannot understand is that #53398 was
released without any information about possible reasons for this problem or
suggested workarounds. My first reaction after reading this bugreport was to
open a new case at CallCenter to get more information about it. Please
release more information with your bug reports !
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Information Services
Senior Programmer Analyst
Tel: 905 712-1084 ext. 3628
Fax: 905 712-6709
E-mail: zadamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Degen - Sun Germany Forte Tools - Bonn
[SMTP:thomas.degensun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:49 AM
To: Adamek, Zenon
Cc: 'Brenda Cumming'; Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
Subject: RE: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
Hi Zenon,
bug #53398 is not a bug which will likely get fixed, it's an informational
bugreport.
You might see an errorstack like Brenda has reported (and described in
informational
bugreport #53398) probably when you are doing something illegal that is
possible
via Forte Tool but Forte is not trapping it for performance reasons. Hence
you will see
the error coming from your illegal operation only at runtime, probably
only
while
running interpreted in the Forte IDE, but in worst case it might be even a
segmentation
violation.
Technotes 12448 'Sudden client partition crashes at runtime' and 11225
'Don't reparent
mapped Widgets between UserWindows at runtime' explain this matter . See
attached.
But maybe Brenda is much more experiencing a problem as described by Forte
Technote 11398 'Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
control'
that might get easily resolved via setting of FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE=0.
Good Luck and Best Regards !
BTW: I've logged bug #53398, so I've felt responsible to explain its real
background.
Thomas
Thomas Degen
Sun Microsystems - Forte Tools
Forte CTE & Sustaining Group
Technical Support Germany
tel.:+49.228/91499-50
MailTo:thomas.degensun.com
Technote 11398 Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
control
SCENARIO:
Getting some unusual interpreter errors that result in an error stating
that
the workspace has been set to read only. Please see Enclosures for the
two
most common error stacks that have been encountered. The abbreviated
versions of the errors are:
- Can't read record (record size = -1)
- Id in index does not match id in record header in data file
- Recursive deserialization attempted.
- Unknown Mark type in deserialization
- Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
Header
is corrupt.
These errors can be happening in either the development environment when
running from one of the development workshops, or with the deployed
application.
The bug outlined in this Technote may be the culprit if the errors above
are
seen when running a client on Windows NT or Motif and the user interface
incorporates ActiveX controls or ListView/TreeView widgets.
CAUSE:
Basically what is happening is that in rare circumstances Forte may invoke
a
nested copy of the interpreter while the first interpreter has yielded.
This
is not a problem in and of itself, but in the case where the original
interpreter was in the middle of a repository fetch when it yielded, and
the second interpreter needs to fetch code as well, we will get one of the
errors listed above, depending on the exact timing. The reason for the
errors is that the repository code at this level is thread-safe but not
re-entrant. It is protected by a mutex that is already owned by the
current task. Which, given the scenario outlined here, where the two
interpreters are running inside of the same task, results in the nested
interpreter being allowed to change data out from under the first.
While for every fetch one or more calls to WindowSystem.Yield will be made
(this is there to prevent the semblance of system lock-up on Win 3.1,
where
Yield is the only way other applications can be allowed to run), there is
a parameter which controls how often to actually yield, which by default
is
set to one out of every 100 calls. This is the reason the problem is
intermittent--you need a yield to occur during a repository fetch
which starts another interpreter which also needs to fetch code from
disk.
The reason this has only surfaced recently is that the nested interpreter
scenario can only happen in 2 cases that we know of:
- ActiveX controls which respond to events/Windows messages
- Outline fields/ListViews with column(s) mapped to virtual
attributes
In all other normal cases, the yield can process the message (typically a
paint message) without starting another interpreter, so regardless of
whether
the first interpreter yielded during a repository operation or not, there
is
no conflict.
SOLUTION:
The workaround is to prevent yields altogether by setting the
FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE environment variable equal to 0 in the client's
environment. This should have no detrimental effects since the yield code
is in place solely for Windows 3.1x clients.
ERROR STACK 1
SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
read-only to
prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your
workspace
contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to save this
work.
First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import
the
changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 695]
Detected at: qqrp_Session::GetObjectById
Last TOOL statement: method EFWindowController.EFEventLoop
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
The remainder of the Error Manager stack is:
SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element (64,67470)
(fetch
bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-only to prevent the
application
from attempting to write to the repository. The repository and work you
have
saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace contains unsaved work,
you
may use the following procedure to save this work. First, export the
changed
components. Then, shut down and restart this application and reopen this
workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the changed components and
save
your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 61]
Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
Last TOOL statement: method EFTabManagerNew.EFNoteBookHandler
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
SYSTEM ERROR: Unknown Mark type in deserialization.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1101, 34]
Detected at: qqrp_DeSerializeObject::ProcessHdr
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
ERROR STACK 2
SYSTEM ERROR: A serious error has occurred in Repository
(c:\PROGRA~1\CSSPTEST\conplu0). Corrective action may be necessary.
Notify
your repository administrator.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1101, 198]
Detected at: qqrp_Repository::Fetch
Last TOOL statement: method
SalesDevelopment_NWC.DEVNotifyofTabSetCurrent
Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
taskId =
[769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
SYSTEM ERROR: Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
Header is corrupt.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1106, 612]
Detected at: qqbt_BtreeAccess::FetchDataFileRecord
Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
taskId =
[769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
Technote 11225 Don't reparent mapped Widgets between UserWindows at
runtime
It is sometimes tempting to unparent a widget from one UserWindow and
reparent
it into another at runtime. However, this can cause crashes if the widget
(or
its decendants) are "mapped" to data. Here's why...
Suppose you have two UserWindows, UW1 and UW2. UW1 contains a DataField
(DF1)
which is mapped to a TextData. UW2 contains a RadioList (RL2) which is
mapped to
a scalar Integer. At compile time, every mapped attribute is internally
assigned
a "Map ID" (a small integer) which is used to tie the Widget to its
corresponding attribute. These Map IDs are used by the Widget to look up a
pointer to their data in a "Map" which is maintained by the UserWindow.
Each
UserWindow is assumed be to independent of the others, so there is nothing
wrong
with Widgets in different UserWindows being assigned the same Map IDs.
In
this
case, let's assume that DF1 and RL2 both got assigned the same Map ID of
3. No
problem so far, since each lives in a separate UserWindow with a separate
map.
Now suppose at runtime the application "detaches" or unparents DF1 from
its
UserWindow and reparents it somewhere into UW2. When it comes time for DF1
to
paint itself the Display System it must ask the Runtime System for the
value of
DF1's mapped attribute. To do that it says "give me the value of the
TextData
for DF1. You'll find it in the Map for this UserWindow (UW1), and its Map
ID is
3". When the runtime system goes to do this it expects to find a TextData
in
this "slot" of the map, but instead it picks up the integer which is
mapped to
RL2. At best this leads to bad data being returned; more likely you get a
segfault and a crash.
If DF1 was not a mapped attribute (say, a Rectangle) there would be no
problem
because there is no data mapped to a Rectangle. If instead of moving DF1
you
created a brand new DataField on the fly there would be no problem,
because the
dynamic DataField would not have any Map ID and so couldn't conflict with
any
IDs in UW2.
So how do you solve this problem? This is exactly what Nested Windows are
all
about. While you can't move DF1 into the middle of UW2, you can nest
UW1.
This
works because UW1 brings its map with it, and when you access DF1 it knows
to
look up its value in UW1's map.
UserWindows are intended to be the "unit of compilabilty" that can be
nested
inside other UserWindows. It is dangerous to "transplant" anything from
inside
one UserWindow into another at runtime.
(Note that you can't avoid this problem by cloning DF1 because the MapID
gets
copied along with it, and the clone will fail in the same way.)
Further details explained in related technote 12448 'Sudden client
partition
crashes at runtime.'
Technote 12448 Sudden client partition crashes at runtime
Scenario : You have two UserWindows, A and B. When Window A starts up, it
instantiates an instance of B and reparents some component of B into A's
window
hierarchy.
This is not allowed and almost always leads to an error at best or at
worse a
segmentation fault.
Here's why :
When you compile a UserWindow in Forte, each "mapped attribute" (whether a
form
element or menu element) is assigned an internal ID which represents an
offset into
that UserWindow's table of mapped attributes. This offset is only valid
in the
context of the UserWindow in which it was compiled. If you detach a
FieldWidget or
MenuWidget from one compiled Window ("tmpMenu" for example) and then
parent
into another compiled window ("tmpWindow") the internal ID comes with it.
When Forte tries to make use of that copied widget it uses the ID as an
offset
into tmpWindow's table of mapped attributes. But that copied offset is
meaningless in the context of tmpWindow's table, so you get some kind off
error.
In this case it found that the data type of the variable in the slot
wasn't
what
was expected. But you might even index off the end of the table and get a
segmentation fault.
There is nothing to prevent you from dynamically creating menu items and
adding
them to a window at runtime; that will work fine. Although of course you
can't
access them via mapped attributes, since those can only be created at
compile time.
But you are not allowed to reparent a widget from one compiled UserWindow
into
the hierarchy of another.
More information may be found in technote 11225 'Don't reparent mapped
Widgets
between UserWindows at runtime'.
Possible errorstacks seen at runtime instead of a complete crash or
segmentation
violation while you are illegally reparenting a widget or menuitem between
windows
at runtime:
Map::SetSubjectData: Invalid conversion from map type 0 to subject type 22
SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 3 in method
qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [1001, 381]
Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 3
Error Time: Wed Aug 09 13:03:57
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "testproject_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd,
taskId =
[D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd.68]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 672 on node ONEWAY in environment Audi3M2Env.
At 13:14 26.09.00 -0400, Adamek, Zenon wrote:
Hi,
It is the unfixed defect 53398. Please contact Forte support.
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda Cumming [SMTP:brenda_cummingtranscanada.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:15 PM
To: Forte User group
Subject: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
Hi,
We are in the process of going from 3J1 to 3.0.M.2, and I am getting
this error that I am unfamiliar with on a GUI that works fine in 3J.
It
does not happen all the time, and I have been unable to establish the
pattern that kicks it off. Has anyone seen this before?
PS- this error is not occurring in the deployed (non-compiled) app,but
when I am running locally from my workspace.
SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 6 in method
qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [1001, 381]
Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 6
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2,
taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Can't find scope 20070 for a class.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [201, 11]
Detected at: qqlo_ClassTableLoadScope at 1
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
read-only to prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository.
The repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If
your
workspace contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure
to save this work. First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and
restart this application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode.
Finally, import the changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 695]
Detected at: qqrp_Session::IsDistributed
Last TOOL statement: method PPMeasWin.
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element
(64,120684) (fetch bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-onlyto
prevent
the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
repository
and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace
contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to savethis
work.
First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the
changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 61]
Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Recursive Deserialization attempted, Internal Error!
Class: qqsp_UsageException with ReasonCode: SP_ER_INVALIDSTATE
Error #: [301, 231]
Detected at: qqsp_DeSerializeDriver::Run at 1
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in anew
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your email but I think it will be interesting for Brenda not me.
It is exactly what I have expected from Forte Support: detailed information
about bugs and workarounds. But what I cannot understand is that #53398 was
released without any information about possible reasons for this problem or
suggested workarounds. My first reaction after reading this bugreport was to
open a new case at CallCenter to get more information about it. Please
release more information with your bug reports !
Regards
Zenon Adamek
Information Services
Senior Programmer Analyst
Tel: 905 712-1084 ext. 3628
Fax: 905 712-6709
E-mail: zadamekpurolator.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Degen - Sun Germany Forte Tools - Bonn
[SMTP:thomas.degensun.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:49 AM
To: Adamek, Zenon
Cc: 'Brenda Cumming'; Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
Subject: RE: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
Hi Zenon,
bug #53398 is not a bug which will likely get fixed, it's an informational
bugreport.
You might see an errorstack like Brenda has reported (and described in
informational
bugreport #53398) probably when you are doing something illegal that is
possible
via Forte Tool but Forte is not trapping it for performance reasons. Hence
you will see
the error coming from your illegal operation only at runtime, probably
only
while
running interpreted in the Forte IDE, but in worst case it might be even a
segmentation
violation.
Technotes 12448 'Sudden client partition crashes at runtime' and 11225
'Don't reparent
mapped Widgets between UserWindows at runtime' explain this matter . See
attached.
But maybe Brenda is much more experiencing a problem as described by Forte
Technote 11398 'Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
control'
that might get easily resolved via setting of FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE=0.
Good Luck and Best Regards !
BTW: I've logged bug #53398, so I've felt responsible to explain its real
background.
Thomas
Thomas Degen
Sun Microsystems - Forte Tools
Forte CTE & Sustaining Group
Technical Support Germany
tel.:+49.228/91499-50
MailTo:thomas.degensun.com
Technote 11398 Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
control
SCENARIO:
Getting some unusual interpreter errors that result in an error stating
that
the workspace has been set to read only. Please see Enclosures for the
two
most common error stacks that have been encountered. The abbreviated
versions of the errors are:
- Can't read record (record size = -1)
- Id in index does not match id in record header in data file
- Recursive deserialization attempted.
- Unknown Mark type in deserialization
- Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
Header
is corrupt.
These errors can be happening in either the development environment when
running from one of the development workshops, or with the deployed
application.
The bug outlined in this Technote may be the culprit if the errors above
are
seen when running a client on Windows NT or Motif and the user interface
incorporates ActiveX controls or ListView/TreeView widgets.
CAUSE:
Basically what is happening is that in rare circumstances Forte may invoke
a
nested copy of the interpreter while the first interpreter has yielded.
This
is not a problem in and of itself, but in the case where the original
interpreter was in the middle of a repository fetch when it yielded, and
the second interpreter needs to fetch code as well, we will get one of the
errors listed above, depending on the exact timing. The reason for the
errors is that the repository code at this level is thread-safe but not
re-entrant. It is protected by a mutex that is already owned by the
current task. Which, given the scenario outlined here, where the two
interpreters are running inside of the same task, results in the nested
interpreter being allowed to change data out from under the first.
While for every fetch one or more calls to WindowSystem.Yield will be made
(this is there to prevent the semblance of system lock-up on Win 3.1,
where
Yield is the only way other applications can be allowed to run), there is
a parameter which controls how often to actually yield, which by default
is
set to one out of every 100 calls. This is the reason the problem is
intermittent--you need a yield to occur during a repository fetch
which starts another interpreter which also needs to fetch code from
disk.
The reason this has only surfaced recently is that the nested interpreter
scenario can only happen in 2 cases that we know of:
- ActiveX controls which respond to events/Windows messages
- Outline fields/ListViews with column(s) mapped to virtual
attributes
In all other normal cases, the yield can process the message (typically a
paint message) without starting another interpreter, so regardless of
whether
the first interpreter yielded during a repository operation or not, there
is
no conflict.
SOLUTION:
The workaround is to prevent yields altogether by setting the
FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE environment variable equal to 0 in the client's
environment. This should have no detrimental effects since the yield code
is in place solely for Windows 3.1x clients.
ERROR STACK 1
SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
read-only to
prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your
workspace
contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to save this
work.
First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import
the
changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 695]
Detected at: qqrp_Session::GetObjectById
Last TOOL statement: method EFWindowController.EFEventLoop
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
The remainder of the Error Manager stack is:
SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element (64,67470)
(fetch
bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-only to prevent the
application
from attempting to write to the repository. The repository and work you
have
saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace contains unsaved work,
you
may use the following procedure to save this work. First, export the
changed
components. Then, shut down and restart this application and reopen this
workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the changed components and
save
your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 61]
Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
Last TOOL statement: method EFTabManagerNew.EFNoteBookHandler
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
SYSTEM ERROR: Unknown Mark type in deserialization.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1101, 34]
Detected at: qqrp_DeSerializeObject::ProcessHdr
Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
taskId =
[7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
ERROR STACK 2
SYSTEM ERROR: A serious error has occurred in Repository
(c:\PROGRA~1\CSSPTEST\conplu0). Corrective action may be necessary.
Notify
your repository administrator.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1101, 198]
Detected at: qqrp_Repository::Fetch
Last TOOL statement: method
SalesDevelopment_NWC.DEVNotifyofTabSetCurrent
Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
taskId =
[769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
SYSTEM ERROR: Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
Header is corrupt.
Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
Error #: [1106, 612]
Detected at: qqbt_BtreeAccess::FetchDataFileRecord
Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
(partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
taskId =
[769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
"ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
Technote 11225 Don't reparent mapped Widgets between UserWindows at
runtime
It is sometimes tempting to unparent a widget from one UserWindow and
reparent
it into another at runtime. However, this can cause crashes if the widget
(or
its decendants) are "mapped" to data. Here's why...
Suppose you have two UserWindows, UW1 and UW2. UW1 contains a DataField
(DF1)
which is mapped to a TextData. UW2 contains a RadioList (RL2) which is
mapped to
a scalar Integer. At compile time, every mapped attribute is internally
assigned
a "Map ID" (a small integer) which is used to tie the Widget to its
corresponding attribute. These Map IDs are used by the Widget to look up a
pointer to their data in a "Map" which is maintained by the UserWindow.
Each
UserWindow is assumed be to independent of the others, so there is nothing
wrong
with Widgets in different UserWindows being assigned the same Map IDs.
In
this
case, let's assume that DF1 and RL2 both got assigned the same Map ID of
3. No
problem so far, since each lives in a separate UserWindow with a separate
map.
Now suppose at runtime the application "detaches" or unparents DF1 from
its
UserWindow and reparents it somewhere into UW2. When it comes time for DF1
to
paint itself the Display System it must ask the Runtime System for the
value of
DF1's mapped attribute. To do that it says "give me the value of the
TextData
for DF1. You'll find it in the Map for this UserWindow (UW1), and its Map
ID is
3". When the runtime system goes to do this it expects to find a TextData
in
this "slot" of the map, but instead it picks up the integer which is
mapped to
RL2. At best this leads to bad data being returned; more likely you get a
segfault and a crash.
If DF1 was not a mapped attribute (say, a Rectangle) there would be no
problem
because there is no data mapped to a Rectangle. If instead of moving DF1
you
created a brand new DataField on the fly there would be no problem,
because the
dynamic DataField would not have any Map ID and so couldn't conflict with
any
IDs in UW2.
So how do you solve this problem? This is exactly what Nested Windows are
all
about. While you can't move DF1 into the middle of UW2, you can nest
UW1.
This
works because UW1 brings its map with it, and when you access DF1 it knows
to
look up its value in UW1's map.
UserWindows are intended to be the "unit of compilabilty" that can be
nested
inside other UserWindows. It is dangerous to "transplant" anything from
inside
one UserWindow into another at runtime.
(Note that you can't avoid this problem by cloning DF1 because the MapID
gets
copied along with it, and the clone will fail in the same way.)
Further details explained in related technote 12448 'Sudden client
partition
crashes at runtime.'
Technote 12448 Sudden client partition crashes at runtime
Scenario : You have two UserWindows, A and B. When Window A starts up, it
instantiates an instance of B and reparents some component of B into A's
window
hierarchy.
This is not allowed and almost always leads to an error at best or at
worse a
segmentation fault.
Here's why :
When you compile a UserWindow in Forte, each "mapped attribute" (whether a
form
element or menu element) is assigned an internal ID which represents an
offset into
that UserWindow's table of mapped attributes. This offset is only valid
in the
context of the UserWindow in which it was compiled. If you detach a
FieldWidget or
MenuWidget from one compiled Window ("tmpMenu" for example) and then
parent
into another compiled window ("tmpWindow") the internal ID comes with it.
When Forte tries to make use of that copied widget it uses the ID as an
offset
into tmpWindow's table of mapped attributes. But that copied offset is
meaningless in the context of tmpWindow's table, so you get some kind off
error.
In this case it found that the data type of the variable in the slot
wasn't
what
was expected. But you might even index off the end of the table and get a
segmentation fault.
There is nothing to prevent you from dynamically creating menu items and
adding
them to a window at runtime; that will work fine. Although of course you
can't
access them via mapped attributes, since those can only be created at
compile time.
But you are not allowed to reparent a widget from one compiled UserWindow
into
the hierarchy of another.
More information may be found in technote 11225 'Don't reparent mapped
Widgets
between UserWindows at runtime'.
Possible errorstacks seen at runtime instead of a complete crash or
segmentation
violation while you are illegally reparenting a widget or menuitem between
windows
at runtime:
Map::SetSubjectData: Invalid conversion from map type 0 to subject type 22
SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 3 in method
qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [1001, 381]
Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 3
Error Time: Wed Aug 09 13:03:57
Exception occurred (locally) on partition "testproject_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd,
taskId =
[D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd.68]) in application
"FTLaunch_cl0", pid 672 on node ONEWAY in environment Audi3M2Env.
At 13:14 26.09.00 -0400, Adamek, Zenon wrote:
Hi,
It is the unfixed defect 53398. Please contact Forte support.
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: Brenda Cumming [SMTP:brenda_cummingtranscanada.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:15 PM
To: Forte User group
Subject: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
Hi,
We are in the process of going from 3J1 to 3.0.M.2, and I am getting
this error that I am unfamiliar with on a GUI that works fine in 3J.
It
does not happen all the time, and I have been unable to establish the
pattern that kicks it off. Has anyone seen this before?
PS- this error is not occurring in the deployed (non-compiled) app,but
when I am running locally from my workspace.
SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 6 in method
qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [1001, 381]
Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 6
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2,
taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Can't find scope 20070 for a class.
Class: qqsp_Exception
Error #: [201, 11]
Detected at: qqlo_ClassTableLoadScope at 1
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
read-only to prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository.
The repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If
your
workspace contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure
to save this work. First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and
restart this application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode.
Finally, import the changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 695]
Detected at: qqrp_Session::IsDistributed
Last TOOL statement: method PPMeasWin.
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element
(64,120684) (fetch bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-onlyto
prevent
the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
repository
and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace
contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to savethis
work.
First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the
changed components and save your workspace.
Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
Error #: [1101, 61]
Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition
"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
SYSTEM ERROR: Recursive Deserialization attempted, Internal Error!
Class: qqsp_UsageException with ReasonCode: SP_ER_INVALIDSTATE
Error #: [301, 231]
Detected at: qqsp_DeSerializeDriver::Run at 1
Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
(partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
[36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
application
"Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in anew
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Re: (forte-users) Fusion for the VAR

Hi,
It is a good idea. In fact, I think that how Forte is
going to integrate her own suite of app. too. ( I
kind of recall that there is a speech on this topic in
Forum ).
However, as Forte will most likely goes toward Java, I
would suggest that you take into account the
abstraction on Conductor ( which is frankly an event
broker ) and Fusion ( which handles the XML mapping )
too. In doing so, you can save guard your investment
on the design without binding tightly with FORTE and I
bet there will be tons of event broker or XML parser
in the future market.
On the other hand, this integration by Fusion would be
perfect for a perfect world. But, in this imperfect
world, it would be hard to do cross-checking between
apps in Fusion.
In the old days, we repulicate data or do file
transfer to integrate apps. In doing so, we also
build-in all the cross-checking procedure / reports.
In the case of Fusion, is there such a safety net to
save guard data integrity. Can I identify a lost
event and trace back to find out whether it is a app.
problem or Conductor problem?
I think the customer would surely like to know.
Regards,
Peter Sham.
--- "Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D."
<[email protected]> wrote:
Fusion has been positioned as an EAI tool, something
at which it appears to
be very, very good, but in recent months I have been
thinking about its
possible role as an architectural tool for those of
us who build large,
multi-application suites of applications. Having
been tossing some of
these ideas around the halls at Harrison Street, I
thought I would try some
of them on this audience as well to see what
reaction I got.
This concept is based on the context that one has
multiple interacting
applications which are loosely coupled, or at least
which should be. E.g.,
an order processing application may need credit
status information from an
accounts receivable application and may generate
invoices which then need
to be tracked for payment by that application, but
the connections between
these applications are specific, limited, and
readily enumerable. Mind
you, people don't always build their applications so
cleanly modularized,
but I think we all agree these days that they should
be.
The idea is to provide each application with a
specific API, which it may
currently have only indirectly. I.e., today one
might simply have calls
directly from one application to another, but one
would gather all these
links together and define an API, probably in XML
which covered all of the
necessary communciations between applications.
These would then be used to
build a Fusion Proxy and one would build the
necessary Conductor processes
to handle the communications which previously might
have been made directly
between applications. There is probably some
performance loss in this
process, but many of these interfaces are not
performance intensive and my
bet is that if the whole Fusion concept has adequate
performance for the
purposes for which it is being primarily marketed,
then it has the
performance for this sort of usage.
One would get several advantages from this
structure:
1) Interapplication communications would be handled
by a Conductor process
and thus be much more readily configurable than any
hard-coded link.
2) One would gain the ability to unplug one's own
application and plug in a
customer's application when the customer insisted on
using something else.
3) The discipline of working in this structure would
insure clean boundries
between applications, which is not only sound
design, but promotes the
flexibility of the overall suite.
4) Those with untransitioned legacy applications
would have a framework
that would allow a mixture of new and old
applications to co-exist, thus
providing them with a transition strategy until the
full product line was
converted.
Note that I am assuming that one would want to build
the individual
applications so that they also used Conductor for
managing their business
process logic, but that seems to me to be an
independent decision from this
one.
So, comments?
Any downsides?
Any added benefits I haven't covered here?
Are there many out there that would benefit from
this approach or just a few?
Is anyone doing anything like this?
Note that the one downside I have found so far is
that Fusion licensing,
independent of the Conductor aspect, is based on the
number of proxies and
so someone like CI who has 15 or more applications
in a typical site is
going to have 15 or more proxies. My bet is that
this can be handled once
it is clear that use of Fusion by a VAR for
integrating own applications is
not the same use as by an end-user integrating
arbitrary multiple applications.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email:
[email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales:
510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support:
510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax:
510-233-6950
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
[email protected]
=====

Yes, they do & one page is 1KB page. We use the same instrument to check
memory usage & to send alerts in our production system.
Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:37 PM
To: 'Saraf, Suraj'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Thanks all for the response. I observed "Allocated Pages" instrument doesn't
change as and when memory usage by the partition changes. I was trying to
find a way to measure the actual memory (specifically in bytes or KBs).
Thanks,
Madhu
-----Original Message-----
From: Saraf, Suraj [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:46 PM
To: 'Epari, Madhusudhan'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello,
I think you can use 'OperatingSystem' service agent & check 'AllocatedPages'
instrument to see how many memory pages are used. You can compare that with
your maximum allocation & send alerts depending on that. Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:15 AM
To: 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello Everyone,
Is there an instrument to track the memory used in the partition at a given
point of time. I have a requirement where an alert has to be generated in
the environment when partition uses all its available memory.
Thanks in advance,
Madhu
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

RE: (forte-users) Reporting tools/components for ForteApplications?

Hi Robert,
A good place to start when it comes to reporting is Forte Consulting. They
have developed a tool called ReportKit, which is ActiveX integration with
Seagate Software's Crystal Reports tool. Crystal is not really a three-tier
tool (although, your Forte Consultant can probably set it up to mimic a
three-tier tool), but it is a quick, easy way to get quality reports from
your existing Forte applications. If you're interested, give your Forte
Sales Rep (or, better still, your Forte Regional Consulting Director) a
call. They can discuss pricing and scheduling. I've done several
integration projects with Crystal, and I highly recommend ReportKit for
small- to medium-sized reporting requirements. As for costs, I don't recall
how much CrystalReports runs, but I think there are developer licenses and
runtime licenses.
FYI, the actual integration of ReportKit is pretty quick. The more
time-consuming piece of any report tool integration is the design and
implementation of the reports to be used.
I hope this helps.
-Katie
Katie Tierney
Quality Management Analyst
Akili Systems Group
601 Jefferson, Suite 3975
Houston, Texas 77002
Office: (713) 655-1400
Cell: (409) 255-1643
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
price is forgotten" --Larry Anderson
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Brooke-N502365 [mailto:Robert.Brookeca.michelin.com]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 8:17 AM
To: kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: (forte-users) Reporting tools/components for Forte
Applications?
Hi all,
We are looking for what is currently in the marketplace to enhance the
reporting
capabilities of Forte. Ideally, we are looking for component libraries that
we
could import into our repository. Do these exist?
Currently, I have found six reporting tools that are out there. The
tools
are Actuate, Crystal Reports, Report Workshop from Indus Consultancy
Services, Brio Technologies (SQR) VisualBRIO, Visual CyberQuery from
Cyberscience Corp., and Beacon from Brahma Software Solutions FORTify
Components. Are there any others for Forte?
If anyone is currently using one of these Reporting Tools for Forte or
any
others, could you give me any indications as to the costs, training, type
of
application using the Reporting tool, would you recommend using the
product
again, does it use wrappering or API, or is it a component based tool, and
any
other relevant information on the product?
Thanks,
Robert Brooke
Application Developer
Michelin North America (Canada) Inc. CA0/CA1
PO Box 399
New Glasgow, Nova Scotia
B2H-3E6
Phone: (902) 753-1977
Fax: (902) 396-2180
Note: We are currently developing in Forte 3.0.L.2. However, we would
like
to select a reporting tool/component within the next month. We are in the
initial phases of our next project, an application to be developed
in-house.
Probably will have two databases, one for real-time data and another one
for
archived data. Probably will need reporting functionality and capabilities
for
both real-time data and archived data.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
The E-Mail System is to be used for business purposes only.
www.mimesweeper.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

At 09:33 AM 4/20/01, Rottier, Pascal wrote:
Forte 4GL is:
1) A language, TOOL (Compare to Java)
2) An IDE (Compare to e.g. JBuilder or FJCE)
3) A collaborative development environment, with central repository (Compare
to ????)
4) A distributed application server / object request broker (Compare to J2EE
servers and/or CORBA)Let's not forget WebEnterprise, Express, and especially Fusion.
I think, SUN is not al all interested in TOOL.If TOOL were just a language and had no market yet, you are probably
right. But, not only is TOOL the key to the Forte environment, but it has
an existing and profitable market. Sun still sells FORTRAN, after all, and
continues to put money into ADE development for all its language
products. The real kicker, though, is that I think iPlanet is very clear
that Fusion, now iIS, is a very key product for them. There may be those
who wish it were written in Java and who might lobby for doing a Java
version, but it was clear at the conference that the iPlanet management
recognize that Java just isn't up to the task at this point. It isn't as
if all the iPlanet tools are actually written in Java, after all.
They will only support them for as long as they need.Or, more likely, for as long as they make money.
Now, in response to Microsofts .NET stratagy. We have yet to see how
succesfull this will be, but I expect Microsoft to push this down the
throats of developers and companies quite succesfully.Like they did DCOM?
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950

Re: (forte-users) Delays in data transfer..server-to-client

I would try using DOM (distributed object manager) traces. trc:do:20 will
give you information on each messages sent from and received by the
partition. Levels are 1, 2, 5, 7, and 8, and trc:do:*:8 is very
verbose. trc:do:20:1 may tell you what you want to know. trc:do:1:1 will
give you a basic 1-line-per DOM event trace that may also be all you need.
Communications manager traces will tell you about network and socket-level
activity, but not about the sizes of the messages themselves. In addition,
the operating system makes decisions about physical packet size and
send/receive timing, so CM activities only generally map to actual network
activity.
-tdc
iPlanet Integration Server Engineering
At 09:24 AM 5/1/01 -0700, you wrote:
All,
We are experiencing delays in object transfer between server and client. The
delays are longer with large objects (a single object with an array of objects
that reflect the rows returned in a database) than small (ie: 10 rows vs 400).
Does anyone have any (actual) experience using the various Forte' flags in
order
to show the actual size of the object/packets being passed between the server
and client?
We are using input/output between client and server, input on all the SO's
within a partition. Response on the server side is good, roughly 6 seconds or
so. The round trip fare however from the time the client makes the SO call to
the time that it completes is in the 25-30 second range, leaving roughly 20-25
seconds unaccounted for. I have brought in the network guys who are
requesting
the data size and packet information. I did not see what I am looking for
using
the trc:cm:*:4 and trc:cm:*:8 flags. I will be trying the trc:cm:*:10
flag, but
Forte' indicates that this flag is very verbose, the systems group hates
it when
I use up all of THEIR disk space!
Any ideas would be appreciated as always.

Jeff,
If the object you are passing does not require changes made to it in the
server partition to be returned, pass the object as copy input (pass by
value not reference). If it is necessary to pass the object as input, try
to pass only the attributes that are required to the remote partition
instead of the whole object.
Input/Output is normaly used with scalar variables. When a scalar is passed
to a remote partition, if the value is changed in that partition, the value
is not returned to the calling partition unless Input/Output is used.
Input/Output should not be used for object type parameters, if you need to
pass a reference, use Input only. If you can pass by value, use Copy Input.
You will notice a huge difference in performance changing from Input to Copy
input when passing large objects.
Hope this helps,
Travis Foote
Fortedeveloper.com Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Bennett" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:24 AM
Subject: (forte-users) Delays in data transfer.. server-to-client
>
All,
We are experiencing delays in object transfer between server and client.The
delays are longer with large objects (a single object with an array ofobjects
that reflect the rows returned in a database) than small (ie: 10 rows vs400).
>
Does anyone have any (actual) experience using the various Forte' flags inorder
to show the actual size of the object/packets being passed between theserver
and client?
We are using input/output between client and server, input on all the SO's
within a partition. Response on the server side is good, roughly 6seconds or
so. The round trip fare however from the time the client makes the SOcall to
the time that it completes is in the 25-30 second range, leaving roughly20-25
seconds unaccounted for. I have brought in the network guys who arerequesting
the data size and packet information. I did not see what I am looking forusing
the trc:cm:*:4 and trc:cm:*:8 flags. I will be trying the trc:cm:*:10flag, but
Forte' indicates that this flag is very verbose, the systems group hatesit when
I use up all of THEIR disk space!
Any ideas would be appreciated as always.
-jeff
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Re: (forte-users) Accessing Technote 10398

Ketie,
let's see, I have been using FORTE since November of
1994. since the beginning those flags have been common
knowledge within the FORTE community and widely
disseminated.
the FORTE flags have been invaluable to me and HAVE
NEVER caused any downtime. sure, there are a few
wildcards in there that can cause trouble, but to
throw out the baby with the bathwater is ridiculous.
what would life be without trc:lo:25? to trace
exceptions.
or trc:os:1:1 and trc:os:5:5 to tune memory
consumption?
Should i have to call a consultant or FORTE tech
support to do the deep dive on exceptions or tune my
applications? I think not.
Overreaction? No.
Mark.
--- Katie Tierney <katiethetierneys.com> wrote:
I think y'all are overreacting. There are log flags
that are detailed in
Technote 10398 that can cause serious implications
if used improperly. I
think Forte/Sun just wants to make sure that people
don't make mistakes that
cost them valuable time.
As a Forte Consultant for many years, I have seen a
good number of people
misuse information that was not completely
understood. In some cases, this
caused excessive downtime for production
applications. The only time I ever
saw Technote 10398 being provided to a customer was
when they were utilizing
Forte Consulting, or when a Technical Support
Engineer was heavily involved.
I was extremely surprised to learn that it was
available to non-employees via
the website - that sounds as if someone may have
inadvertantly marked it as
customer-viewable (incorrectly, obviously) in Sun's
internal systems.
Again, I think you're overreacting. I am sure that
this isn't a case of Sun
thinking anyone is "stupid." It's a matter of
providing the support that
people need to properly utilize the tools available.
-Katie
mark joyce wrote:
read: Sometimes, the technotes are markedunviewable
to customers because they might need further
explanation. Let me know if you need to log acase.
in other words, you are TOO STUPID to use FORTElogger
flags, although they have been widely distributedand
used for years by FORTE users.
i can't believe it either. i don't know what iwould
have done for the last 5 years without using theFORTE
flags. such a wealth of good output!
what an excuse! "they might need furtherexplanation"
.. if i had to log every problem with FORTE,instead
of resolving them myself through the information
obtained by using flags, i would have lost my joba
long time ago.
mark.
--- Jeff Bennett <jeff_bennettsehamerica.com>wrote:
I thought it might be prudent to share with youthe
response I received from Sun
regarding the inability to access technote 10398
(Forté logger flags). I was
able to access it 3+ weeks ago, and fortunatelykept
a hard-copy. But, how are
we supposed to do our job effectively and
expediently if we do not have
(complete) access to this resource?
I thought the technotes were completely open tothe
Forté development
community.... wrong.
-jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by JeffBennett/SEH
on 09/11/2000 09:02 AM
Forte Support <supportforte.com> on 09/08/2000
10:05:17 AM
To: Jeff Bennett/SEHsehamerica.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Accessing Technote 10398
Fax to:
Hello Jeff,
Were you at one point able to access thistechnote?
You know why -- it's
because this technote is marked for employeeviewing
only and not available
for customer viewing. If you need further
assistance or need to look at
this technote, what you would need to do is loga
call with us and then a
tech support specialist will give you a callback.
Sometimes, the
technotes are marked unviewable to customersbecause
they might need
further explanation. Let me know if you need tolog
a case.
Thanks!
At 09:57 AM 9/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
I am no longer able to access technote 10398
(forte
logger flags)... why?
-jeff~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sun® microsystems
Jeannie Lee
Phone: (510) 451-5400
Fax (510) 869-2010
Email: jeannie.leesun.com
Forte Tools Response Coordinator
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
http://mail.yahoo.com/
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. Tounsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
http://mail.yahoo.com/

Ketie,
let's see, I have been using FORTE since November of
1994. since the beginning those flags have been common
knowledge within the FORTE community and widely
disseminated.
the FORTE flags have been invaluable to me and HAVE
NEVER caused any downtime. sure, there are a few
wildcards in there that can cause trouble, but to
throw out the baby with the bathwater is ridiculous.
what would life be without trc:lo:25? to trace
exceptions.
or trc:os:1:1 and trc:os:5:5 to tune memory
consumption?
Should i have to call a consultant or FORTE tech
support to do the deep dive on exceptions or tune my
applications? I think not.
Overreaction? No.
Mark.
--- Katie Tierney <katiethetierneys.com> wrote:
I think y'all are overreacting. There are log flags
that are detailed in
Technote 10398 that can cause serious implications
if used improperly. I
think Forte/Sun just wants to make sure that people
don't make mistakes that
cost them valuable time.
As a Forte Consultant for many years, I have seen a
good number of people
misuse information that was not completely
understood. In some cases, this
caused excessive downtime for production
applications. The only time I ever
saw Technote 10398 being provided to a customer was
when they were utilizing
Forte Consulting, or when a Technical Support
Engineer was heavily involved.
I was extremely surprised to learn that it was
available to non-employees via
the website - that sounds as if someone may have
inadvertantly marked it as
customer-viewable (incorrectly, obviously) in Sun's
internal systems.
Again, I think you're overreacting. I am sure that
this isn't a case of Sun
thinking anyone is "stupid." It's a matter of
providing the support that
people need to properly utilize the tools available.
-Katie
mark joyce wrote:
read: Sometimes, the technotes are markedunviewable
to customers because they might need further
explanation. Let me know if you need to log acase.
in other words, you are TOO STUPID to use FORTElogger
flags, although they have been widely distributedand
used for years by FORTE users.
i can't believe it either. i don't know what iwould
have done for the last 5 years without using theFORTE
flags. such a wealth of good output!
what an excuse! "they might need furtherexplanation"
.. if i had to log every problem with FORTE,instead
of resolving them myself through the information
obtained by using flags, i would have lost my joba
long time ago.
mark.
--- Jeff Bennett <jeff_bennettsehamerica.com>wrote:
I thought it might be prudent to share with youthe
response I received from Sun
regarding the inability to access technote 10398
(Forté logger flags). I was
able to access it 3+ weeks ago, and fortunatelykept
a hard-copy. But, how are
we supposed to do our job effectively and
expediently if we do not have
(complete) access to this resource?
I thought the technotes were completely open tothe
Forté development
community.... wrong.
-jeff
---------------------- Forwarded by JeffBennett/SEH
on 09/11/2000 09:02 AM
Forte Support <supportforte.com> on 09/08/2000
10:05:17 AM
To: Jeff Bennett/SEHsehamerica.com
cc:
Subject: Re: Accessing Technote 10398
Fax to:
Hello Jeff,
Were you at one point able to access thistechnote?
You know why -- it's
because this technote is marked for employeeviewing
only and not available
for customer viewing. If you need further
assistance or need to look at
this technote, what you would need to do is loga
call with us and then a
tech support specialist will give you a callback.
Sometimes, the
technotes are marked unviewable to customersbecause
they might need
further explanation. Let me know if you need tolog
a case.
Thanks!
At 09:57 AM 9/8/00 -0700, you wrote:
I am no longer able to access technote 10398
(forte
logger flags)... why?
-jeff~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Sun® microsystems
Jeannie Lee
Phone: (510) 451-5400
Fax (510) 869-2010
Email: jeannie.leesun.com
Forte Tools Response Coordinator
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
http://mail.yahoo.com/
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. Tounsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
http://mail.yahoo.com/

RE: (forte-users) FW: (forte-users)

Hi there
Thanks very much for the solution - just wanted to let you know . We
implemented the design that technote 11378 suggested .
It worked .
Thanks very much
Cheers
Jen
-----Original Message-----
From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 March, 2001 9:21 PM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: (forte-users) FW: (forte-users)
Hi David,
The problem is that the SO uses an attribute of its class ACBAccount as
the ObjectReference pointer. SO is not a stateless object. The possible
scenario before crash can be that client A and B calls SO at the same
time. A's thread creates ACBAccount gets the ObjectReference. At this
point B's thread is activated, does the same as A creates new
ObjectReference. Probably the next switch between A and B will be in the
Connect() (B should wait for OLE server). If A is reactivated it doesn't
get the original own reference but the B's reference. It can cause the
crash and means that a thread can use reference created in some other
thread.
Regards,
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: David McPaul [SMTP:dmcpaullumley.com.au]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:52 PM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: RE: (forte-users)
Jenni,
As Zenon has pointed out, technote 11378 talks about problems that
can occur if the calls made to an OLE object are not from within the same
thread the OLE object was created in. It goes on to show a design to
avoid
this.
However, the code you have given DOES communicate to the OLE object
in the same thread as it was created. So the problem as I see it is more
likely to be that the OLE object is not being garbage collected. Although
you do explicitly NIL out the ACBAccount object there is a technote 12453
that deals with the need to set the ObjectReference of CDispatch objects
to
NIL to allow the OLE object to be completely reclaimed by the garbage
collector. Failure to do so when using code that creates a new OLE object
every time you ask for an account validation will eventually run the
partition out of memory.
As pointed out in a previous post you can also increase
FORTE_STACK_SIZE but this will delay the problem not correct it.
Rather than create the connection each time you may want to think
about redesigning the method as shown in tech note 11378.
Cheers
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:05 AM
To: 'Els, Jenni'
Cc: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: RE: (forte-users)
Hi Jenni,
The most important issue by designing an OLE connection between a Forte
server partition and an OLE component is taking into account that an OLE
object can be referenced from the NT thread in Forte partition that it was
created in. It is the reason that you have no problems with your mini-app
in
single-threaded version.
This problem is discussed in the Technote 11378. You can find a workaround
for your problem there, too.
Regards,
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: Els, Jenni [SMTP:JElsnbs.co.za]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:28 AM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: (forte-users)
Hi there
We have this situation
We are calling a Service Object (in the server partition) from ourclient
partition.This service object calls a method which calls a DLLregistered
on our server (VB code) . This VB code access a database on anotherserver
.(DSN set up on our server ).The database is sql server .
We are having the problem where for about 3 hours in the morning , the
system works perfectly. We then get a segmentation violation on this
partition . When we run interpreted we can see that this is an OLEinvoked
exception. The partition does not always show as offline in econsole
and
because it does not , we cannot 'online' another . We cannot take the
entire app down as everything hangs . Eventually our technical depthas
to
down the server
We set up a mini-app looping through and calling the DLL to simulate
the
problem . It worked fine. When we put another asynchronous task in the
method to call the service object , it erred quite soon. We thencreate
an
attribute of type mutex and locked using that. The mini-app worked.
However our app in development eventually hanged (without the
partition
coming though) .
The service Object is an environment visible service object in asingle
(non-replicated partition) . It has a dialog duration = session .
In the project is
ACB : ACBObject
ACBObject : CDispatch (shared = disallowed , distributed =
disallowed, transactional = disallowed, monitored = allowed)
ACBValidator : Object (shared = allowed , distributed =allowed,
transactional = disallowed, monitored = disallowed)
ACBVaidatorSO : ACBValidator
In this method we have this code to call the DLL
self.ACBAccount = new;
self.ACBAccount.CreateUsingCLSID(classID='{2EFD3084-7B05-11D3-857F-00105A4
8CEA0}');
pErrorMessage = new;
acbaccount.BankCode = pBankCode.value;
acbaccount.BranchCode = pBranchCode.value;
at : VariantI2 = new;
at.Value = pAccountType.Value;
acbaccount.AccountType = at.Value;
acbaccount.AccountNo = pAccountNo.value;
begin
acbaccount.Connect();
exception
when e : GenericException do
ex : GenericException = new;
ex.SetWithParams(severity = SP_ER_ERROR,
message = 'There was an error connecting to the database');
raise ex;
end;
begin
err : i2 = acbaccount.ValidateAccount();
if err != 0 then
pErrorMessage.SetValue(acbaccount.ErrDescriptionStr(iErrorCode= err));
acbaccount.Disconnect();
return false;
else
pErrorMessage.SetValue('The account is
valid!!');
acbaccount.Disconnect();
self.ACBAccount = NIL ;
return true;
end if;
exception
when e : GenericException do
acbaccount.Disconnect();
ex : GenericException = new;
ex.SetWithParams(severity = SP_ER_ERROR,
message = 'There was an error Validating the account');
Task.ErrorMgr.AddError(ex);
task.errormgr.ShowErrors();
raise e;
end;
exception
when e : GenericException do
acbaccount.Disconnect();
Task.ErrorMgr.ShowErrors();
raise e;
If anybody has any suggestions , they would be most welcome
Thanks very much
Cheers
Jenni Els************************************************************************Th
is e-mail is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above
and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately at helpdesklumley.com.au and destroy the original message.
While this mail and any attachments have been scanned for common computer
viruses and found to be virus free, we recommend you also perform your own
virus checking processes before opening any attachments.
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com--
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
WARNING:
Any unauthorised use or interception of this email is illegal. If this email
is not intended for you, you may not copy, distribute nor disclose the
contents to anyone. Save for bona fide company matters, the BoE Group does
not accept any responsibility for the opinions expressed in this email.
For further details please see: http://www.nbs.co.za/emaildisclaim.htm

Hi there
Thanks very much for the solution - just wanted to let you know . We
implemented the design that technote 11378 suggested .
It worked .
Thanks very much
Cheers
Jen
-----Original Message-----
From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 March, 2001 9:21 PM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: (forte-users) FW: (forte-users)
Hi David,
The problem is that the SO uses an attribute of its class ACBAccount as
the ObjectReference pointer. SO is not a stateless object. The possible
scenario before crash can be that client A and B calls SO at the same
time. A's thread creates ACBAccount gets the ObjectReference. At this
point B's thread is activated, does the same as A creates new
ObjectReference. Probably the next switch between A and B will be in the
Connect() (B should wait for OLE server). If A is reactivated it doesn't
get the original own reference but the B's reference. It can cause the
crash and means that a thread can use reference created in some other
thread.
Regards,
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: David McPaul [SMTP:dmcpaullumley.com.au]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 11:52 PM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: RE: (forte-users)
Jenni,
As Zenon has pointed out, technote 11378 talks about problems that
can occur if the calls made to an OLE object are not from within the same
thread the OLE object was created in. It goes on to show a design to
avoid
this.
However, the code you have given DOES communicate to the OLE object
in the same thread as it was created. So the problem as I see it is more
likely to be that the OLE object is not being garbage collected. Although
you do explicitly NIL out the ACBAccount object there is a technote 12453
that deals with the need to set the ObjectReference of CDispatch objects
to
NIL to allow the OLE object to be completely reclaimed by the garbage
collector. Failure to do so when using code that creates a new OLE object
every time you ask for an account validation will eventually run the
partition out of memory.
As pointed out in a previous post you can also increase
FORTE_STACK_SIZE but this will delay the problem not correct it.
Rather than create the connection each time you may want to think
about redesigning the method as shown in tech note 11378.
Cheers
David
-----Original Message-----
From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:ZAdamekpurolator.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 5:05 AM
To: 'Els, Jenni'
Cc: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: RE: (forte-users)
Hi Jenni,
The most important issue by designing an OLE connection between a Forte
server partition and an OLE component is taking into account that an OLE
object can be referenced from the NT thread in Forte partition that it was
created in. It is the reason that you have no problems with your mini-app
in
single-threaded version.
This problem is discussed in the Technote 11378. You can find a workaround
for your problem there, too.
Regards,
Zenon
-----Original Message-----
From: Els, Jenni [SMTP:JElsnbs.co.za]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 2:28 AM
To: 'forte-userslists.xpedior.com'
Subject: (forte-users)
Hi there
We have this situation
We are calling a Service Object (in the server partition) from ourclient
partition.This service object calls a method which calls a DLLregistered
on our server (VB code) . This VB code access a database on anotherserver
.(DSN set up on our server ).The database is sql server .
We are having the problem where for about 3 hours in the morning , the
system works perfectly. We then get a segmentation violation on this
partition . When we run interpreted we can see that this is an OLEinvoked
exception. The partition does not always show as offline in econsole
and
because it does not , we cannot 'online' another . We cannot take the
entire app down as everything hangs . Eventually our technical depthas
to
down the server
We set up a mini-app looping through and calling the DLL to simulate
the
problem . It worked fine. When we put another asynchronous task in the
method to call the service object , it erred quite soon. We thencreate
an
attribute of type mutex and locked using that. The mini-app worked.
However our app in development eventually hanged (without the
partition
coming though) .
The service Object is an environment visible service object in asingle
(non-replicated partition) . It has a dialog duration = session .
In the project is
ACB : ACBObject
ACBObject : CDispatch (shared = disallowed , distributed =
disallowed, transactional = disallowed, monitored = allowed)
ACBValidator : Object (shared = allowed , distributed =allowed,
transactional = disallowed, monitored = disallowed)
ACBVaidatorSO : ACBValidator
In this method we have this code to call the DLL
self.ACBAccount = new;
self.ACBAccount.CreateUsingCLSID(classID='{2EFD3084-7B05-11D3-857F-00105A4
8CEA0}');
pErrorMessage = new;
acbaccount.BankCode = pBankCode.value;
acbaccount.BranchCode = pBranchCode.value;
at : VariantI2 = new;
at.Value = pAccountType.Value;
acbaccount.AccountType = at.Value;
acbaccount.AccountNo = pAccountNo.value;
begin
acbaccount.Connect();
exception
when e : GenericException do
ex : GenericException = new;
ex.SetWithParams(severity = SP_ER_ERROR,
message = 'There was an error connecting to the database');
raise ex;
end;
begin
err : i2 = acbaccount.ValidateAccount();
if err != 0 then
pErrorMessage.SetValue(acbaccount.ErrDescriptionStr(iErrorCode= err));
acbaccount.Disconnect();
return false;
else
pErrorMessage.SetValue('The account is
valid!!');
acbaccount.Disconnect();
self.ACBAccount = NIL ;
return true;
end if;
exception
when e : GenericException do
acbaccount.Disconnect();
ex : GenericException = new;
ex.SetWithParams(severity = SP_ER_ERROR,
message = 'There was an error Validating the account');
Task.ErrorMgr.AddError(ex);
task.errormgr.ShowErrors();
raise e;
end;
exception
when e : GenericException do
acbaccount.Disconnect();
Task.ErrorMgr.ShowErrors();
raise e;
If anybody has any suggestions , they would be most welcome
Thanks very much
Cheers
Jenni Els************************************************************************Th
is e-mail is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above
and may contain information that is confidential and privileged. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately at helpdesklumley.com.au and destroy the original message.
While this mail and any attachments have been scanned for common computer
viruses and found to be virus free, we recommend you also perform your own
virus checking processes before opening any attachments.
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com--
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
WARNING:
Any unauthorised use or interception of this email is illegal. If this email
is not intended for you, you may not copy, distribute nor disclose the
contents to anyone. Save for bona fide company matters, the BoE Group does
not accept any responsibility for the opinions expressed in this email.
For further details please see: http://www.nbs.co.za/emaildisclaim.htm

Re: (forte-users) Anyone used Semaphors in Forte ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for