RE: (forte-users) Support for OpenVMS v7.1-2 on EV6 chip setques tion

http://www.forte.com/support/platforms.html
Dec Alpha with OpenVMS 7.1 is supported for 3L2
-----Original Message-----
From: Haben, Dirk [SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 1999 2:37 AM
To: 'Soapbox Forte Users'
Cc: 'Forte Support'
Subject: (forte-users) Support for OpenVMS v7.1-2 on EV6 chip set
question ...
Folxs
I have a new EV6 Alpha available and want to run Forte on it.
OpenVMS v7.1-2 is a supported OS for Forte v30G2 and 30L2 I think.
OpenVMS v7.1-2 is a supported OS for the new EV6 Alpha chipset.
Will Forte v30G2 or 30L2 work on this hardware?
Is it supported on this platform?
When will it be supported on the EV6 chip set and what version of Forte do
I
need?
Thanks,
Dirk
PS: Anyone out here using the EV6 and Forte?
For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

At 09:33 AM 4/20/01, Rottier, Pascal wrote:
Forte 4GL is:
1) A language, TOOL (Compare to Java)
2) An IDE (Compare to e.g. JBuilder or FJCE)
3) A collaborative development environment, with central repository (Compare
to ????)
4) A distributed application server / object request broker (Compare to J2EE
servers and/or CORBA)Let's not forget WebEnterprise, Express, and especially Fusion.
I think, SUN is not al all interested in TOOL.If TOOL were just a language and had no market yet, you are probably
right. But, not only is TOOL the key to the Forte environment, but it has
an existing and profitable market. Sun still sells FORTRAN, after all, and
continues to put money into ADE development for all its language
products. The real kicker, though, is that I think iPlanet is very clear
that Fusion, now iIS, is a very key product for them. There may be those
who wish it were written in Java and who might lobby for doing a Java
version, but it was clear at the conference that the iPlanet management
recognize that Java just isn't up to the task at this point. It isn't as
if all the iPlanet tools are actually written in Java, after all.
They will only support them for as long as they need.Or, more likely, for as long as they make money.
Now, in response to Microsofts .NET stratagy. We have yet to see how
succesfull this will be, but I expect Microsoft to push this down the
throats of developers and companies quite succesfully.Like they did DCOM?
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950

Similar Messages

Support for OpenVMS v7.1-2 on EV6 chip set question...

Folxs
I have a new EV6 Alpha available and want to run Forte on it.
OpenVMS v7.1-2 is a supported OS for Forte v30G2 and 30L2 I think.
OpenVMS v7.1-2 is a supported OS for the new EV6 Alpha chipset.
Will Forte v30G2 or 30L2 work on this hardware?
Is it supported on this platform?
When will it be supported on the EV6 chip set and what version of Forte do I
need?
Thanks,
Dirk
PS: Anyone out here using the EV6 and Forte?

I'm almost sure that Sun's DS (5.x or 6.x) has never been offered for Itanium (for HP-UX or any other OS).
Someone from Sun may have a better answer.
Of course, the download list here will give you a good answer too:
[http://www.sun.com/software/products/directory_srvr_ee/get.jsp]

Re: (forte-users) Fusion for the VAR

Hi,
It is a good idea. In fact, I think that how Forte is
going to integrate her own suite of app. too. ( I
kind of recall that there is a speech on this topic in
Forum ).
However, as Forte will most likely goes toward Java, I
would suggest that you take into account the
abstraction on Conductor ( which is frankly an event
broker ) and Fusion ( which handles the XML mapping )
too. In doing so, you can save guard your investment
on the design without binding tightly with FORTE and I
bet there will be tons of event broker or XML parser
in the future market.
On the other hand, this integration by Fusion would be
perfect for a perfect world. But, in this imperfect
world, it would be hard to do cross-checking between
apps in Fusion.
In the old days, we repulicate data or do file
transfer to integrate apps. In doing so, we also
build-in all the cross-checking procedure / reports.
In the case of Fusion, is there such a safety net to
save guard data integrity. Can I identify a lost
event and trace back to find out whether it is a app.
problem or Conductor problem?
I think the customer would surely like to know.
Regards,
Peter Sham.
--- "Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D."
<[email protected]> wrote:
Fusion has been positioned as an EAI tool, something
at which it appears to
be very, very good, but in recent months I have been
thinking about its
possible role as an architectural tool for those of
us who build large,
multi-application suites of applications. Having
been tossing some of
these ideas around the halls at Harrison Street, I
thought I would try some
of them on this audience as well to see what
reaction I got.
This concept is based on the context that one has
multiple interacting
applications which are loosely coupled, or at least
which should be. E.g.,
an order processing application may need credit
status information from an
accounts receivable application and may generate
invoices which then need
to be tracked for payment by that application, but
the connections between
these applications are specific, limited, and
readily enumerable. Mind
you, people don't always build their applications so
cleanly modularized,
but I think we all agree these days that they should
be.
The idea is to provide each application with a
specific API, which it may
currently have only indirectly. I.e., today one
might simply have calls
directly from one application to another, but one
would gather all these
links together and define an API, probably in XML
which covered all of the
necessary communciations between applications.
These would then be used to
build a Fusion Proxy and one would build the
necessary Conductor processes
to handle the communications which previously might
have been made directly
between applications. There is probably some
performance loss in this
process, but many of these interfaces are not
performance intensive and my
bet is that if the whole Fusion concept has adequate
performance for the
purposes for which it is being primarily marketed,
then it has the
performance for this sort of usage.
One would get several advantages from this
structure:
1) Interapplication communications would be handled
by a Conductor process
and thus be much more readily configurable than any
hard-coded link.
2) One would gain the ability to unplug one's own
application and plug in a
customer's application when the customer insisted on
using something else.
3) The discipline of working in this structure would
insure clean boundries
between applications, which is not only sound
design, but promotes the
flexibility of the overall suite.
4) Those with untransitioned legacy applications
would have a framework
that would allow a mixture of new and old
applications to co-exist, thus
providing them with a transition strategy until the
full product line was
converted.
Note that I am assuming that one would want to build
the individual
applications so that they also used Conductor for
managing their business
process logic, but that seems to me to be an
independent decision from this
one.
So, comments?
Any downsides?
Any added benefits I haven't covered here?
Are there many out there that would benefit from
this approach or just a few?
Is anyone doing anything like this?
Note that the one downside I have found so far is
that Fusion licensing,
independent of the Conductor aspect, is based on the
number of proxies and
so someone like CI who has 15 or more applications
in a typical site is
going to have 15 or more proxies. My bet is that
this can be handled once
it is clear that use of Fusion by a VAR for
integrating own applications is
not the same use as by an end-user integrating
arbitrary multiple applications.
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email:
[email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales:
510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support:
510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax:
510-233-6950
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
[email protected]
=====

Yes, they do & one page is 1KB page. We use the same instrument to check
memory usage & to send alerts in our production system.
Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:37 PM
To: 'Saraf, Suraj'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Thanks all for the response. I observed "Allocated Pages" instrument doesn't
change as and when memory usage by the partition changes. I was trying to
find a way to measure the actual memory (specifically in bytes or KBs).
Thanks,
Madhu
-----Original Message-----
From: Saraf, Suraj [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:46 PM
To: 'Epari, Madhusudhan'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello,
I think you can use 'OperatingSystem' service agent & check 'AllocatedPages'
instrument to see how many memory pages are used. You can compare that with
your maximum allocation & send alerts depending on that. Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:15 AM
To: 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello Everyone,
Is there an instrument to track the memory used in the partition at a given
point of time. I have a requirement where an alert has to be generated in
the environment when partition uses all its available memory.
Thanks in advance,
Madhu
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

Want multi user support for xperia c3

Eventhough its one of the main highlights of lolipop Sony ignore that feature with ease. Please provide that feature . .please sony

I believe that Sony should know about the camera problems. That is why the rolling process is only for India and Taiwan until now. I also want to have multi user support. However, I don't think it can be achieved due to the 1G ram limitation! Xperifirm and flashtool are good for the user becuase I can roll back to kitkat anytime when I get problem. However, someone may not know how to use it. It makes them feel frustrated! I just hope Sony can fix the camera bugs ASAP. For me, the main function of a smart phone is to take photo, phone call, whatsapp and browse the webpage. Please make sure user can be happy with this BASIC function! Lollipop or Kitkat?? I don't care. Anyways, thanks for the update. I know it take time. Thank you again!!

Feature request: Add left-handed users support for Show Pointer

Show Pointer is a very useful tool for precise movements and operations on the touch display.
However, the way it currently works is optimized for right-handed people (as the button is on the left side and you maneuver with the right hand.
As there are very many left-handed people among creative individuals, I'm kindly asking to add left-hand support to Show Pointer, which would effectively mirror the user interface of the tool (button on the right side).
This could be configured in the Photoshop Touch setting panel.
I would really appreciate someone from Adobe reading this and adding this to the product backlog. Thanks.

If I'm ever asked to give input, I'll be sure to +1 for you.

R: (forte-users) Web for Forte - what is the rightproduct?

Oh man it looks like a problem with the web server.
Its an error that happens on SAP, even my dad reported an error like this to me but i wasn't able to solve it.
What i find is that its an error with browser incompatibility,
Check this http://scn.sap.com/message/10338540

Re: (forte-users) nested FORTE ITERATE tags in WebEnterprise

Yes, they do & one page is 1KB page. We use the same instrument to check
memory usage & to send alerts in our production system.
Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2001 2:37 PM
To: 'Saraf, Suraj'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Thanks all for the response. I observed "Allocated Pages" instrument doesn't
change as and when memory usage by the partition changes. I was trying to
find a way to measure the actual memory (specifically in bytes or KBs).
Thanks,
Madhu
-----Original Message-----
From: Saraf, Suraj [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 12:46 PM
To: 'Epari, Madhusudhan'; 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello,
I think you can use 'OperatingSystem' service agent & check 'AllocatedPages'
instrument to see how many memory pages are used. You can compare that with
your maximum allocation & send alerts depending on that. Thanks.
Suraj
-----Original Message-----
From: Epari, Madhusudhan [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2001 11:15 AM
To: 'Forte User Forum'
Subject: (forte-users) Instrument for memory used in the partition
Hello Everyone,
Is there an instrument to track the memory used in the partition at a given
point of time. I have a requirement where an alert has to be generated in
the environment when partition uses all its available memory.
Thanks in advance,
Madhu
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

IPad needs multi user support NOW

I believe Apple will sell more iPad if they enable multi user support for these devices.
Since it's currently a single user device tied to your iTune and MobileMe/Exchange, it's not something you could share between family. I thought buying an extra iPad for the wife would solve the problem, but I was wrong. Now we have two iPads, it's still not working out very well. We'd leave them in different places of the house, and we'd still grab the nearest iPad regardless who it belongs to.
Had Apple made the iPad multi user, I would more likely to buy one or two more. One for the kitchen, one for the living room, one for the family room and one for the master bathroom. That would make life so much easier as I don't have to take my iPad with me. I could pick one up wherever I am.
Now without multi user support, I'd have to buy a total of 8 iPads and my house would look ridicules with two ipads in each room. Suppose if I have a few teenage kids in the house, I'd have to buy 16 or 20 iPads. That's just mad!
So instead, I wait. For now I'll just have to cope with 2 iPads, one of which configured for the wife. 50% of the time, I use an iPad with my wife's emails, music and books on it.

Tell Apple - http://apple.com/feedback. We're just users like you.
It seems so far that Apple has had absolutely no problem selling iPads at this point.

RE: (forte-users) Reporting tools/components for ForteApplications?

Hi Robert,
A good place to start when it comes to reporting is Forte Consulting. They
have developed a tool called ReportKit, which is ActiveX integration with
Seagate Software's Crystal Reports tool. Crystal is not really a three-tier
tool (although, your Forte Consultant can probably set it up to mimic a
three-tier tool), but it is a quick, easy way to get quality reports from
your existing Forte applications. If you're interested, give your Forte
Sales Rep (or, better still, your Forte Regional Consulting Director) a
call. They can discuss pricing and scheduling. I've done several
integration projects with Crystal, and I highly recommend ReportKit for
small- to medium-sized reporting requirements. As for costs, I don't recall
how much CrystalReports runs, but I think there are developer licenses and
runtime licenses.
FYI, the actual integration of ReportKit is pretty quick. The more
time-consuming piece of any report tool integration is the design and
implementation of the reports to be used.
I hope this helps.
-Katie
Katie Tierney
Quality Management Analyst
Akili Systems Group
601 Jefferson, Suite 3975
Houston, Texas 77002
Office: (713) 655-1400
Cell: (409) 255-1643
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
price is forgotten" --Larry Anderson
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Brooke-N502365 [mailto:Robert.Brookeca.michelin.com]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2000 8:17 AM
To: kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: (forte-users) Reporting tools/components for Forte
Applications?
Hi all,
We are looking for what is currently in the marketplace to enhance the
reporting
capabilities of Forte. Ideally, we are looking for component libraries that
we
could import into our repository. Do these exist?
Currently, I have found six reporting tools that are out there. The
tools
are Actuate, Crystal Reports, Report Workshop from Indus Consultancy
Services, Brio Technologies (SQR) VisualBRIO, Visual CyberQuery from
Cyberscience Corp., and Beacon from Brahma Software Solutions FORTify
Components. Are there any others for Forte?
If anyone is currently using one of these Reporting Tools for Forte or
any
others, could you give me any indications as to the costs, training, type
of
application using the Reporting tool, would you recommend using the
product
again, does it use wrappering or API, or is it a component based tool, and
any
other relevant information on the product?
Thanks,
Robert Brooke
Application Developer
Michelin North America (Canada) Inc. CA0/CA1
PO Box 399
New Glasgow, Nova Scotia
B2H-3E6
Phone: (902) 753-1977
Fax: (902) 396-2180
Note: We are currently developing in Forte 3.0.L.2. However, we would
like
to select a reporting tool/component within the next month. We are in the
initial phases of our next project, an application to be developed
in-house.
Probably will have two databases, one for real-time data and another one
for
archived data. Probably will need reporting functionality and capabilities
for
both real-time data and archived data.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
The E-Mail System is to be used for business purposes only.
www.mimesweeper.com
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

At 09:33 AM 4/20/01, Rottier, Pascal wrote:
Forte 4GL is:
1) A language, TOOL (Compare to Java)
2) An IDE (Compare to e.g. JBuilder or FJCE)
3) A collaborative development environment, with central repository (Compare
to ????)
4) A distributed application server / object request broker (Compare to J2EE
servers and/or CORBA)Let's not forget WebEnterprise, Express, and especially Fusion.
I think, SUN is not al all interested in TOOL.If TOOL were just a language and had no market yet, you are probably
right. But, not only is TOOL the key to the Forte environment, but it has
an existing and profitable market. Sun still sells FORTRAN, after all, and
continues to put money into ADE development for all its language
products. The real kicker, though, is that I think iPlanet is very clear
that Fusion, now iIS, is a very key product for them. There may be those
who wish it were written in Java and who might lobby for doing a Java
version, but it was clear at the conference that the iPlanet management
recognize that Java just isn't up to the task at this point. It isn't as
if all the iPlanet tools are actually written in Java, after all.
They will only support them for as long as they need.Or, more likely, for as long as they make money.
Now, in response to Microsofts .NET stratagy. We have yet to see how
succesfull this will be, but I expect Microsoft to push this down the
throats of developers and companies quite succesfully.Like they did DCOM?
=========================================================================
Thomas Mercer-Hursh, Ph.D email: [email protected]
Computing Integrity, Inc. sales: 510-233-9329
550 Casey Drive - Cypress Point support: 510-233-9327
Point Richmond, CA 94801-3751 fax: 510-233-6950

RE: (forte-users) Forte SMTP and POP3 Support

Scaffolds includes in a protocol library an smtphandler which allows us to
send emails. It works great! You can try contacting someone at Metamor to
see if they can give you more information on this. I can't give you any
code as it is part of their package. Sorry!
-----Original Message-----
From: Rottier, Pascal [mailto:Rottier.Pascalpmintl.ch]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 7:22 AM
To: 'edwardsmjwillis.com'; kamranaminyahoo.com
Subject: RE: (forte-users) Forte SMTP and POP3
Support
Mark,
Unfortunately, Forte doesn't offer any ready-to-use internet
protocoll
support libraries (like FTP, Telnet, SMTP, POP3, NNTP,
UU-code
or MIME). I think this would be a valuable enhancement of
Forte.
Does any one know if SUN plans to include this into Forte?
Does
any one know if there is any third-party set of Tool-classes
that
supports this?
Pascal
> -----Original Message-----
> From: edwardsmjwillis.com [SMTP:edwardsmjwillis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 3:36 PM
> To: kamranaminyahoo.com
> Subject: (forte-users) Forte SMTP and POP3 Support
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Our Forte development team are currently investigating how
we can add
> internet
> mail capabilities to a Forte application. Our application
needs to
> send/receive
> mails from a mail server in an NT environment. Does forte
provide SMTP and
> POP3
> protocol support (libraries) so that we can use external
connection class
> to
> connect to the server and send/ receive mails or do we
have to use third
> party
> controls ?.
>
> Any help regarding code examples or third party solutions
would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Mark J Edwards
> Senior Technical Specialist
> Willis
>
> Email: edwardsmjwillis.com
>
>
>
>
>
> The information in this email and in any attachments is
confidential and
> may be
> privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy this
> message,
> delete any copies held on your systems and notify the
sender immediately.
> You
> should not retain, copy or use this email for any purpose,
nor disclose
> all or
> any part of its content to any other person.
>
>
> --
> For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
> the login: forte and the password: archive. To
unsubscribe, send in a new
> email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
For the archives, go to:
http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe,
send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:
forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Hi,
Unfortunatly, Forte does not provide SMTP and POP3 protocoles.
But, you can use External connections to do it if you need.
You can find a simple SMTP send mail sample code on
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dnguyen/ . The receive should be as easy as the send.
For MIME base 64 encoding and decoding, it should last one or two weeks of coding
(if you need optimization).
One advantage of coding this in Tool directly is the portability.
In your case, on NT, you could also interface with MAPI using for instance the
ActiveX interface.
By that way, you will already have SMTP, POP3 and MIME.
Hope this helps,
Daniel Nguyen
Freelance Forte Consultant
http://perso.club-internet.fr/dnguyen/
edwardsmjwillis.com a écrit:
Hi,
Our Forte development team are currently investigating how we can add internet
mail capabilities to a Forte application. Our application needs to send/receive
mails from a mail server in an NT environment. Does forte provide SMTP and POP3
protocol support (libraries) so that we can use external connection class to
connect to the server and send/ receive mails or do we have to use third party
controls ?.
Any help regarding code examples or third party solutions would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Mark J Edwards
Senior Technical Specialist
Willis
Email: edwardsmjwillis.com
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and may be
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message,
delete any copies held on your systems and notify the sender immediately. You
should not retain, copy or use this email for any purpose, nor disclose all or
any part of its content to any other person.
For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

Request for input about Forte support for the Eurocurrency

The design work for Forte support for the Euro currency is underway.
The Euro becomes legal at the start of 1999.
It is important that Forte support for the Euro currency provides
all the features that knowledgeable users will expect and require.
Please email me ([email protected]) before July 31 if you know of
features that should be supported, or if you have suggestions or
thoughts of any kind regarding supporting the Euro currency.
Thanks ..
Walt Loew
Forte Engineering
Walt Loew [email protected]
Forte Software Inc. 510.869.3428
1800 Harrison St.
Oakland CA. 94612
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Jonathan,
Contact BEA sales, I believe that version 7.0 supports the seamless
replacement of security providers and that several major security vendors
have developed providers that are or will shortly be commercially available.
Alex
"Jonathan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
First off, this may seem redundant.
Our company is looking for security products that can be used to
secure the Weblogic Application server. We are currently upgrading
from 5.1 to 7.0 and left to my own devices I would use the Security
that is built into weblogic.
However in order to do the due diligence I need to provide other
options i.e. get a product that can be configured to provide security
for the Application server. An additional nice to have feature would
be security for resources outside of Weblogic.
My primary request is for any websites that give a comparison of
such tools. but if anyone has experience using a security tool with
weblogic, it would be great to hear this. If anyone has used an
external LDAP server with Weblogic 7.0 that would be interesting also.

Multi-language support for user-specified text strings used in the forms

multi-language support for user-specified text strings used in the forms
Instead of creating multiple forms, 1 in each different language, for the same service, is there any workaround?

Hoan - is your question what are the considerations when creating multiligual catalogs? If so, I can tell you that at other clients I have seen them use a single catalog for one or two languages. For the two langugages, such as Spanish/English, you can create a single catalog with both of them. Once you get to more than two languages, the catalog would get unweildy and is therefore not suggested.

Apple changed my Apple ID to the email address associated with my iTunes account. I now can no longer access my account because the old user name is no longer valid and has no password. I have been on the phone with tech support for hours trying to fix.

Apple changed my Apple ID to the email address associated with my iTunes account. I now can no longer access my account because the old user name is no longer valid and has no password. I have been on the phone with tech support for hours trying to fix this. I can not update any of the apps associated with that user name.

Is this itunes on the iPad or on my computer? Thank you for the reply.

Lack of Migration support for 6.0 & 10g users

Hi,
One of the 1st things we wanted to do with the beta as an existing customer is to validate migrating a project from our existing Production version (6.0) to 11g.
While the import appears to work, opening any imported diagram throws an XML parsing exception.
After raising an SR, it turns out that migrating from previous versions is unsupported until 11gR2.
This puts me in a tricky spot as one of the main business drivers to adopt 11g is product upgrade.
I am very surprised to see existing customers nt being catered for in the new version, as running multiple versions in Prod is not a realistic option for most.
Backwards compatability is therefore very important to the existing user base!
So, questions for Oracle:
1. Can you please reconsider the lack of migration support for R1?
2. if this feature cannot be working for R1, what is the expected release date (even if its just a quarter) for R2?
3. To save my time, is there a list of what other features are not for going to be available in the Beta / R1 release?
As a Beta tester my time is precious, and I need to know what I can expect to work, rather than report issues only to then find out that its not supported...
Thanks,
Ian
.

Hi Ian,
You are right in the sense that upgrade will be supported in BPM 11gR2. More specifically, the upgrade will support OBPM 10gR3 to BPM 11gR2. Customers in older versions of OBPM and ALBPM will need to upgrade to OBPM 10gR3 before attempting the upgrade to BPM 11gR2. To upgrade to OBPM 10gR3, there are a series of pointers in our documentation on how to do this. I can explicitly provide links if you are interested in this mandatory upgrade before moving to BPM 11g.
As per the reason for not being able to support upgrade in this first version of BPM 11g, it simply boils down to time to create the new unified BPM platform which in itself is a major undertake from an Engineering perspective. Once the foundation is complete (this is the objective for BPM 11gR1), we will start working on completing the delta to upgrade OBPM 10gR3 projects to BPM 11gR2 as best as possible. There is a document we have been sharing with customers with Best Practices for implementing OBPM 10gR3 projects with idea of an upgrade to BPM 11g. We do have significant knowledge on some pieces that we will be able to automate from a migration perspective and some others that will be hard to upgrade. If you are interested in this document, we can provide this to you.
If you have any other questions, please let me know. I would be more than happy to assist with migration questions with the most up to date knowledge I have on this front.
Regards,
eduardoc.

EXP-00105: parameter CONSISTENT is not supported for this user

Hi,
I have use Oracle 10g on unix platform
i have export is taken from following command
exp \'/ as sysdba\' file=t.dmp full=y buffer=10485760 log=0101.log CONSISTENT=y statistics=none
export is sucessfull but one warning
EXP-00105: parameter CONSISTENT is not supported for this user
if i have use without CONSISTENT parameter then export is successfull ,
why EXP-00105 error occured ?

As per Oracle Error Notes:
EXP-00105: parameter string is not supported for this user
Cause: The user attempted to specify either CONSISTENT or OBJECT_CONSISTENT when connected as sysdba.
Action: If a consistent export is needed, then connect as another user.
Looks likE the SYS user cannot do a transaction level consistent read (read-only transaction). You could have performed this by SYSTEM user or any DBA priviliged user to to take the complete export of your DB.
Anyway, for more information the error "EXP-00105", please take a look into the same question on another Oracle related forums.
http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/05-2006/msg00236.html
Regards,
Sabdar Syed.

RE: (forte-users) Support for OpenVMS v7.1-2 on EV6 chip setques tion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for