Re: Sudden loss of project image quality in iMovie 11

Hi
I'm an anxious technophobe looking for answers...
The image quality of my iMovie project suddenly went from crisp, to blurry and made the black areas in the film grey and pixilated/blocky (or is it considered 'noise'?). It had been perfectly fine before. The footage was shot on a 2011 Sony Handicam and I'm using a 2011 MacBook Pro. I had recently installed updates, including one that supposed fixed out of synch sound problems. I had a loss of quality with another project and optimised it to "original size" (It took hours and made absolutely no difference BTW). I should also mention my hard drive has limited space at the moment and iMovie is running very slowly.
Any suggestions/ diagnosis???
I am anxious to restore the previous sharp quality I had just hours ago.
Thanks

It sounds like the hard disk space could be the culprit.
I would recommend you get an external drive. You need to move some of your events to the external drive to free up space. This must be done within iMovie. Let us know if you need help with this. (or search the discussions for how to move events)

Similar Messages

  • Image quality in iMovie

    Hi guys,
    I am trying to use iMovie to put together a slide show (I am a wildlife photographer) and it seems great for the job
    There are a couple of bugs within iMovie itself but mostly no big deal, except for one that is bugging me.
    The images I have generated are perfect quality when viewed in Adobe Lightroom, iPhoto or any other app, but in iMovie there appear to be far fewer colours so that (for example) the sky in an image is heavily pixelated. I can only guess there are fewer colours in the image.
    I am confused because in one of the articles I read it claimed that iMovie was directly accessing the file on disk.
    I simply dragged and dropped the hi-res images (they are all between 5 and 15 meg size) into iMovie.
    Has anyone else come across this? How can I make the images in iMovie look proper so that I can export the

    Are our events all co-mingled? Since ownership is ignored I assume we can see each other's video clips? This seems pretty messy to me and prevents any sort of privacy. In fact this basically breaks the whole user model.
    Since still images are not stored as an event in iMovie '08, adding an image from iPhoto, your desktop, etc. adds a copy of the file to you project to serve as the "source" for later export of your project. In addition, since there is a maximum size associated with your project, this "stored" image may be scaled if the original height is greater than 1080 pixels. Therefore, my recommendation was to actually look at the "stored, scaled" file in your project so as to compare it with your original files to see there there was any loss in image quality. You can manually open the project "package" using the "contextual" menu option "Show Package Contents" at the Finder level.
    I opened it in iMovie but can't see that option nor an option for setting colours to millions (which would probably solve my problem).
    The ideal here is to open the file stored in your project and look at it in the QT Player for comparison with the original file. When I said "color depth should be millions," I was referring to the color depth you should find in the inspector window when you open the files in the QT player. Both should normally read "millions" unless you saved them otherwise.

  • Poor image quality using iMovie 8 or iDVD after importing DV file via FW

    Hello,
    i am a complete newby and asking for help. I have bought a Panasonic NV-GS320EG-S miniDV Camcorder. First i connected it via S-Video to my Pioneer Plasma which worked fine.
    I have connected the camcorder via Firewire to my iMac 20/2,4 GHz, camcorder will launch import window, streaming works but in iMovie the image quality is already rather poor. I can cut files and all but after using Import film and burning it with latest Toast, picture quality is even worse, that means colors are natural but no sharpness, lots of shivering lines as soon as the angle is moving.
    I've tried to import directly into iDVD with the direct transfer function for Firewire which works technically as well but the result is mainly the same, when i burn the DVD the picture quality gets far worse than via S-Video connection.
    Last thing i tried is importing to iMovie, importing for media browser and reopening file in iDVD which burns the DVD later, all that works technically fine, but the image result remains absolutely poor, my wife meant inacceptable...
    Any ideas what that could be??? I've always imported and exported the film with the largest picture mode possible...

    I am using the Panasonic HDC-SD5 camcorder which records in AVCHD.
    I also have a JVC miniDV camcorder.
    The following is available in iMovie 08 help:If the larger sizes are not available, the original project media isn’t large enough to render in that size. The largest media size used in the project determines the final movie sizes you can render.
    Tiny: Always 176 by 144 pixels.
    Mobile: Always 480 by 272 pixels.
    Medium: Varies in size from 640 by 480 pixels (standard aspect ratio) to 640 by 360 pixels (widescreen), depending on the size of the media in your project.
    Large: Always 960 by 540 pixels (widescreen). No large size is rendered if your original video isn’t high definition (HD).

  • Photo image quality in iMovie

    Hi ... I am attempting to create an iMovie that will include photos and video footage.
    I read that the best presentation quality for the photos would be achieved creating a slideshow in iPhoto and exporting the slideshow, and importing the resulting Quicktime movie into iMovie. This would bypass issues created during the iMovie image rendoring process.
    I just did a brief test run using the above steps. The image quality in the Qtime video was not very good.
    Am I missing a step in here someplace?
    The final show will be played on a large screen, so I am very concerned about image sharpness.
    Thank you in advance.
    Message was edited by: David Ris

    I'm not sure what you mean by media folder, a folder of JPEG files is a media folder as is a folder of audio files.
    More Info:
    When dragging any folder of high quality photos to iMove it has to change it from stills to video. Apples and oranges; a conversion takes place. I just experimented by exporting iPhoto file of high resolution photos to QuickTime changed the QuickTime resolution from 640 x 480 to 1280 x 800 then imported it into iMovie. Then I exported iPhoto full resolution pictures to my desktop and then dragged them to the time line. These photos have text in the pictures. The original photos are 2581 x 1836 when I played the slide show from iMovie I could not tell the difference from the QuickTime movie that I placed in the time line and the full quality photos exported to a folder on my desktop then dragged to the same timeline as I did the QuickTime movie. However the QuickTime movie played independently in QuickTime was far superior to the QuickTime Movie played in iMovie on my computer. My monitor is set at 1680 x 1050.
    Text in iMove will show Jaggies when viewed at close working range as I mentioned in an earlier post you must view iMovie at the proper viewing distance because your slides have been converted to video. Drag one of your slides to the desktop you will see that it becomes; example > Still 10.dv > in QuickTime format, no longer a JPEG file. Once you export your slide show to QuickTime you don't have the editing ease of moving your pictures position, changing slide duration, music etc.
    For others to view your movies you will eventually have to burn your slide show in iDVD unless you are using your computer and a projector. An hour long iMovie can become a very large file about 10 GB but will play very nicely from a computer. Burn that movie to iDVD it will become about 1GB.
    Dick

  • Image quality in iMovie 11

    I'm working on a personal documentary with 16mm footage (it's been de-interlaced) , but because I have a non OpenCL iMac I'm relegated to using iMovie 11 for the time being for budget reasons.  I will also upconvert my 16mm film footage to HD so I can take advantage of the higher rez for all the stills I will be using in this documentary.  What is the story on iMovie 11 image quality?  I understand that FCP X has many more features, but would any given moment in my documentary look the same as FCP X, or does iMovie just not look as good.

    It sounds like the hard disk space could be the culprit.
    I would recommend you get an external drive. You need to move some of your events to the external drive to free up space. This must be done within iMovie. Let us know if you need help with this. (or search the discussions for how to move events)

  • Image quality using iMovie 08 vs Final Cut Pro

    I read in November's Macworld that if I use a tapeless camcorder, "you won't get the best image quality if you use iMovie '08 because the software converts each movie clip to smaller, more manageable size. To get the highest quality you'll need to be running Final Cut Pro on a Mac Pro with at least 2GB of RAM." Do you all agree with this? And if so, please consider the following. I used a mini DV camcorder to transfer all my tapes to my computer and to an external hard drive. Have I already lost that image quality in doing so using iMovie? If so, can Final Cut Pro import from iMovie and improve that quality by decompressing or will I need to retransfer the tapes using Final Cut Pro or will the difference be too negligible to be noticed and not to bother. Thanks, SWestD

    I read in November's Macworld that if I use a tapeless camcorder, "you won't get the best image quality if you use iMovie '08 because the software converts each movie clip to smaller, more manageable size. To get the highest quality you'll need to be running Final Cut Pro on a Mac Pro with at least 2GB of RAM." Do you all agree with this?
    It depends on the format. In general, the consumer tapeless cameras shoot some highly compressed variant of the mpeg2 or mpeg4 format (delivery formats). These formats are not designed to be edited but rather to be displayed directly from the camera to the TV. In order to edit the material, you must first convert the files from their delivery format to something editiable. This conversion usually results in LARGER not smaller files. There is the potential for some minimal alteration of the image in the transcoding process. This is the trade-off for shooting with such a compressed format.
    And if so, please consider the following. I used a mini DV camcorder to transfer all my tapes to my computer and to an external hard drive. Have I already lost that image quality in doing so using iMovie?
    No, capturing DV material from tapes using iMovie is a direct digital transfer. DV/NTSC or DV/PAL video as captured from tape is the muxed (mixed audio and video) DV stream. It is an exact replica of what is on the tape.
    If so, can Final Cut Pro import from iMovie and improve that quality by decompressing or will I need to retransfer the tapes using Final Cut Pro or will the difference be too negligible to be noticed and not to bother.
    FCE and FCP capture material from tapes slightly differently than iMovie. While iMovie brings the material from the tape unaltered, FCE/FCP uses Quicktime during capture to pull the audio and video into separate streams with in the resulting file. By having the audio demuxed, the programs are able to edit multiple video streams simultaneously while iMovie is limited on one at a time. The video quality is not altered in this demuxing process.
    If you choose to shoot with a tapeless camera and edit the material in FCE or FCP, FCP has a wider range of formats that can be handled by the program, but in no way will it deal with them all. Many still need to be converted into an edit friendly format before you bring them into the program.
    x

  • Loss of display image quality when fit to screen

    Hi everyone,
    I've noticed that when I'm editing with PSE and have the view set so that the photo fits the screen (which means, it's very much zoomed out), the quality of the photo suffers.  Almost like there's some pixelation, but not really.  I apologize for the unclear explanation, I just don't know what the term is for this loss of quality when zoomed out a lot.  I don't mean to disparage PSE, which is a great program, but I don't have this problem with another (free) program I also use.  I'm just trying to find out if it's something in my display settings that I can change or some other way I can fix this.  I often like to see the whole picture when editing but it's almost impossible to do editing when looking at the whole picture in PSE since it looks so off.
    Thank you.

    The image size are 1600x1200 or larger and should be adequate in size.  Anyone know how to improve the quality of the stills? I feel it may have something to do with the program resizing/ downsizing the pics.
    You are correct. This is a case of bigger not being better. I would suggest resizing in Photoshop, Photoshop Elements, or similar, to the Frame Size of your Project, or just slightly larger, if you need to pan on any, when they are zoomed out to full size.
    This ARTICLE will give you some tips on resizing.
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Loss of PNG Image Quality

    I'm trying to display a PNG as a title screen for a game. I'm quite the newb, as the image itself will attest.
    Source: http://i30.tinypic.com/sfw96o.png
    Screenshot result: http://i25.tinypic.com/29m2d6v.png
    I've got all the RenderingHints turned to the quality settings, and use the following image loading/drawing code to put the freshly loaded image into a BufferedImage for later use:
    g2.drawImage((new ImageIcon(getClass().getClassLoader().getResource("assets/title.png"))).getImage(),0,0,null);Any ideas? I'm hoping that this is something that people have seen before, but I'm happy to provide more code upon request.

    >
    Thanks for the reply again. Since Numain's example causes the same loss of color depth on my machine, I've just modified it:>Huh...
    OK - I tried your source, and like Numain, failed to see the problem on my PC - the image appeared in the frame at the full color depth.
    There were some slightly suspicious aspects to that source, so I have changed them, and made a few other changes to get more information. Run the source below and post back your results, but most importantly, does the problem still happen using this source?
    Here are my results..
    java.vm.version:      1.6.0-b105
    java.vendor:      Sun Microsystems Inc.
    os.name:      Windows XP
    os.arch:      x86
    os.version:      5.1
    *** end system props
    GraphicsEnvironment: sun.awt.Win32GraphicsEnvironment@9f671b
    GraphicsDevice: Win32GraphicsDevice[screen=0]
    GraphicsConfiguration: sun.awt.Win32GraphicsConfig@1b9240e
      [dev=Win32GraphicsDevice[screen=0],pixfmt=0]
    DisplayMode - bitdepth/WxH: 24/1024x768
    ColorModel (screen): ColorModel: #pixelBits = 24 numComponents = 3
      color space = java.awt.color.ICC_ColorSpace@ca0115
      transparency = 1 has alpha = false isAlphaPre = false
    *** end screen props
    Read start:      Sat Mar 22 20:11:51 EST 2008
    Read end:      Sat Mar 22 20:17:04 EST 2008
    *** end image load
    ColorModel: ColorModel: #pixelBits = 32 numComponents = 4
      color space = java.awt.color.ICC_ColorSpace@ca0115
      transparency = 3 has alpha = true isAlphaPre = false
    true is Error? false
    *** end cons..:      Sat Mar 22 20:17:04 EST 2008The code used.
    import java.awt.*;
    import java.awt.image.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    import javax.imageio.ImageIO;
    import java.net.URL;
    import java.util.Date;
    public class PngQuality extends JPanel {
      private BufferedImage image;
      public PngQuality() throws Exception {
        URL imageUrl = new URL("http://i30.tinypic.com/sfw96o.png");
        GraphicsEnvironment ge = GraphicsEnvironment.
          getLocalGraphicsEnvironment();
        System.out.println( "GraphicsEnvironment: " + ge );
        GraphicsDevice gd = ge.getDefaultScreenDevice();
        System.out.println("GraphicsDevice: " + gd);
        GraphicsConfiguration gc = gd.getDefaultConfiguration();
        System.out.println("GraphicsConfiguration: " + gc);
        DisplayMode dm = gd.getDisplayMode();
        System.out.println("DisplayMode - bitdepth/WxH: " +
          dm.getBitDepth() + "/" +
          dm.getWidth() + "x" +
          dm.getHeight()
        ColorModel cmScreen = gc.getColorModel();
        System.out.println("ColorModel (screen): " + cmScreen);
        System.out.println("*** end screen props");
        // read the image..
        System.out.println("Read start: \t" + new Date() );
        image = ImageIO.read(imageUrl);
        System.out.println("Read end: \t" + new Date() );
        System.out.println("*** end image load");
        setPreferredSize(new Dimension(800, 600));
        MediaTracker tracker = new MediaTracker(this);
        tracker.addImage(image, 0);
        /* Thought it might be useful.. */
        String[] properties = image.getPropertyNames();
        if (properties!=null) {
          for (int ii=0; ii<properties.length; ii++) {
            System.out.println(
              properties[ii] +
              ": " +
              image.getProperty( properties[ii] )
        /* Check the color model.. */
        ColorModel cm = image.getColorModel();
        System.out.println("ColorModel: " + cm);
        // I get the impression that ImageIO.read blocks and
        // this is redundant, but keep for the moment.
        try {
          tracker.waitForAll();
        } catch(InterruptedException ie) {
          ie.printStackTrace();
        // Is there any error loading the image, in that VM?
        System.out.println("" + tracker.checkAll() +
          " is Error? " + tracker.isErrorAny()
        System.out.println("*** end cons..: \t" + new Date() );
      protected void paintComponent(Graphics g) {
        // did you not read my advice about the ImageObserver?
        // What am I ..talkin' to myself here?
        g.drawImage(image, 0, 0, this);
      public static void main(String[] args) {
        /* Get some basic info. */
        String[] sysProp = {
          "java.vm.version",
          "java.vendor",
          "os.name",
          "os.arch",
          "os.version"
        for (int ii=0; ii<sysProp.length; ii++) {
          System.out.println( sysProp[ii] +
            ": \t" +
            System.getProperty(sysProp[ii]) );
        System.out.println("*** end system props");
        // best to invoke a runnable to create the GUI
        Runnable r = new Runnable() {
          public void run() {
            JFrame f = new JFrame();
            f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            try {
              f.getContentPane().add(new PngQuality());
            } catch(Exception e) {
              f.getContentPane().add(
                new JLabel("See Stacktrace!"));
              e.printStackTrace();
            f.pack();
            f.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
            f.setVisible(true);
        EventQueue.invokeLater(r);
    }Oh, and AFAIR is a less common variant of AFAIK. As Far As I Recall/As Far As I Remember.
    My apologies for tossing about obscure abbreviations.
    There was a thread on usenet I vaguely recall where some nonser wished to implement a JProgressBar for an image download. Everyone pointed out that images properly displayed within a Java based ImageObserver would provide a better (+ prettier and more relevant) download indicator. GIF images will (or at least, can) show 'low detail' before full download. JPEG will scan down from the top to the bottom of an image. Someone pointed out that PNG supports (I think it was) a number of different mechanisms for 'quick low-detail display'.
    Oddly, this is one of the few instances I've seen where the (apparently) blocking behavior of the ImageIO.read() calls for a JPB/ProgressMonitorInputStream.
    Edit 1:
    ColorModel and GraphicsConfiguration info. line wrapped for better formatting.
    P.S. Can you tell from my output, why I commented on the image size? ;-)
    Edited by: AndrewThompson64 on Mar 22, 2008 9:46 AM

  • Poor Image quality/Slideshow/iMovie to iDVD

    I placed about 150 jpegs as clips in iMovie HD (v.5.0.2). I made them all 3.25 seconds long and gave them all a short overlap transition. I set them to music and exported to iDVD (v.5.0.1). Once the DVD was burned, I viewed it with disappointment. Briefly, during the transitions the images are of great quality. But the actual image clips are very poor quality. I'm new to this and I find all the many options for making quicktime movies a little overwhelming. But, exporting to iDVD doesn't have any options. I thought it was supposed to maintain the quality.
    What did I do wrong or what can I do right?

    Karl Peterson said,
    "If there are unrendered clips in the Timeline when we tell iMovie to Share (Export) a project to iDVD, iMovie will ask permission to render those clips. (Rendering converts the clips to video clips.)
    These may include still photos, photos imported with the Ken Burns checkbox turned OFF. Photos imported with the Ken Burns checkbox ON are rendered by Ken Burns; iMovie won't ask to render them again.
    If we grant permission to render clips, iMovie will render them with very poor quality, adding lots of "jaggies" to the photos. It's a bug.
    To avoid the bug, do NOT grant permission to render when iMovie asks. Then iDVD will render them for us, which it does with good quality.
    So, to avoid the bug do any ONE of these:
    1. Import all photos with the Ken Burns checkbox ON.
    2. If iMovie asks permission to render when exporting the project, do NOT grant permission.
    3. Instead of sharing from iMovie to iDVD, drop the iMovie project into the iDVD project window.
    Karl"

  • Sudden Overlay Shift and Drop in Image Quality

    I’ve been authoring DVDs for two years now, and operating out of my current authoring lab for 4 months. All of a sudden, with this one project, I’m having a frustrating menu problem.
    The symptoms of the problem are:
    1. Overlays no longer match up, they’re WAY off, by about %10 of screen size
    2. Big drop in image quality of menus, text looks like garbage.
    Here’s my workflow for the menus:
    1. Create .mov files in After Effects, comp settings D1 720x486, render at lossless
    2. Pull into FCP to create audio, render in FCP as 10 Bit Uncompressed, export using compressor at MPEG-2 (DVD Best 90 minutes)
    3. Create overlay files in AE, render frames as PSD files
    I’ve tried a lot of variations on this tonight, such as exporting .tiff’s from FCP and building the overlay in Photoshop, or using Compressor to encode the .mov’s from AE independent of FCP. The two symptoms are always there. When I pull the raw .mov from AE into DVD Studio Pro, the quality is a little better but the overlays are still off.
    Please Help!
    <Edited by Moderator>

    I Feel your pain guys! The problem is, you are creating the comp in AE with the incorrect Size. I experienced the same problem for months and actually went back and forth between DVDSP and Photoshop until the overlays fit. After extreme headaches I decided to try something different.
    Here's my process;
    1. start by creating the comp in AE at NTSC D1 Square Pixels (720 X540)
    2. complete the animation
    3. then on rendering go to the output module and click stretch
    4. Select NTSC DV (720 X 480). This will put it down to what you need it to be in DVDSP
    5. Then create your overlays at the 720 X 486
    6. Import and build your DVD as usual and it should work out
    Somehow this seems to trick DVDSP into putting things where they are supposed to be. It may seem dumb and archaic, but it beats going back and forth! I hope it works for you!

  • Image quality on CP8 Responsive Project

    Has anyone come across image quality drop off when publishing to a responsive project in CP8?
    I currently have a few .PNG icons I need to use with transparency and on different screen sizes they resize as you would expect.
    But the quality really drops off on iOS (iPhone 5) where as when showing on a desktop they look fine.
    Even when having the image as a fixed size of the correct pixels the .PNG still looks pixellated on the iPhone.
    I've tried changing quality settings but to no avail, my first thought was it's network compression over 4G/3G but it's the same on WiFi.
    I'm hoping I'm missing something obvious?

    Two for Two in helping me TLC....amazing!
    The worrying this is that Captivate seems to be not only compressing the image but adjusting the size slightly.
    The image had moved from 112x64 to 112x65.  As soon as I overwrote the images with the originals and re-named them in the output folder the quality was drastically improved.  Obviously this isn't ideal for every time I publish the content but it's a fix for now.
    Hopefully Adobe see this and rectify it in a future build.
    Thanks again.

  • Loss of image quality after rotate canvas

    PS7 on Win XP
    Windows Explorer and some software bundled with digital cameras [Canon and Panasonic] warn when rotating a picture that there may be loss of image quality. Presumably it must re-compress the jpg image file?
    In order to avoid that problem, I have been rotating image files in PS7, since no such warning comes up there.
    Is there loss of image quality by rotating or cropping in PS7? I usually save jpg files at quality level 10.
    TIA
    Bruce

    Have seen this posted several months back. Try a search to see if you can dredge up this issue. If not successful, come back and someone with more memory cells than I can answer it.

  • Project Images/Thumbnails suddenly gone (image count visible)

    Hi,
    The images/thumbnails in one of my projects are suddenly gone. The project image count (number) is still visible in the projects side bar. And I can see the images in the project overview-big-icon window. But the images are not viewed/visible when I click the project. I have tried fixing the database and exporting the project but neither worked. The odd thing is . What can I do?
    Thanks for your help.
    Message was edited by: Erbsenroller
    Message was edited by: Erbsenroller

    Hi Nathan,
    You are my hero I must have activated a filter accidentally. Thanks so much for your help.
    Erbsenroller

  • The image quality suddenly downgraded in Photoshop

    Hello guys,
    today when I'm editing my file as usual, suddenly I found out that the image quality are downgraded inside photoshop
    but it become smooth and normal again when I try to blow up the image. The saved image have no trouble as well.
    When I'm using general preview size, it will be like this
    When I blow up the detail, it become smooth again like this
    I'm not sure if I accidentially clicked any button, could anyone help with this please? big thanks!!!

    this is windows system and I've checked the image processor box
    The text is not rendered into pixels either,
    the below is the screen capture:

  • Image quality suddenly much worse in almost all apps (Visible pixels)

    Hi everyone
    Suddenly the image quality om my macbook pro started going fubar. I started noticing that everything on facebook looked so bad, and then i started to realize that it was all images/pictures and everything that was bad while browsing. I then tried loading up some HD movies that used to be totally pixel perfect, and now they look pretty bad too(quciktime)
    Anyone know what this could be and how to resolve this?
    I'm running Mac OS X 10.5.7 on a Macbook Pro from late 2008 (Unibody)
    Bendix

    Here you go with a screenshot:
    http://www20.zippyshare.com/v/38662055/file.html
    What is most noticable to me is my profile picture on facebook that is completely pixeled out, and like everything on vimeo looks weird. Especially the smiley logos, the upload a video logo and get facebook connected logo.
    If you want me to upload it elsewhere, let me know.

Maybe you are looking for