Re-using bind variables in Pro*C

Using dynamic SQL method 4. Application originally written back in, oh 1999-ish, using Oracle 7. We've upgraded to Oracle 10g. I've looked through the old manuals ( Pro*C Supplement to the ORACLE Precompilers Guide Version 1.5) for an answer to a question and can't find it in the old manuals. I haven't tried looking through the online manuals for the newer version yet, so if the answer is readily available there I apologize.
The question is, "Can a bind variable be used more than once within a SQL command?"
Example: find all employees whose first or last name is not Lee.
SELECT first_name, last_name
FROM employee
WHERE first_name <> :criteria1
AND last_name <> :criteria2;
In an example like this, both bind variables contains the same value (Lee). Is it still required to have separate bind variables? Or could I re-use a bind variable, like this:
SELECT first_name, last_name
FROM employee
WHERE first_name <> :criteria1
AND last_name <> :criteria1;
Obviously, this is a simplified example. In my application, there are some large unioned SQL statements that re-use the user's id over a dozen times. It would be nice to use just one bind variable repeatedly, rather than having ":userid1, :userid2, :userid3, ..., userid12".
Thanks in advance,
Darren

Got it... you mean, do I ever use a bind variable to store the result of a SQL statement (query). Answer is no, the bind variables are always criteria that are used by the SQL. Output is obtained by using FETCH.
So I ought to be safe then.
Thank you,
Darren

Similar Messages

Report Using Bind Variables

Hey Everyone,
I'm having a bit of trouble creating a report. I need the FROM part of the code to use bind variables. I have come up with this peice of code below but im getting the following error:
failed to parse SQL query:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 8:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "" when expecting one of the following:
begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
form
current cursor
The symbol "" was ignored.
ORA-06550: line 2, column 24:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "" when expecting one of the following:
begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
form
current
Can anyone see where im going wrong?
Thanks in advance,
-N.S.N.O.
Code*
DECLARE
x VARCHAR2 (4000);
BEGIN
x := x || 'select *';
x := x || 'from ';
x := x || :p13_schema;
x := x || '.ddl_log@';
x := x || :p13_db_name;
x := x || '_DBAAPEX.TNTEWW.COM';
RETURN (x);
END;

Hey Roel and Daylocks,
After getting frustrated for a while i deleted the page and started again. I put in the exact same code and it worked just how i wanted in the first place :S
The only thing i did different is when i was creating the report region the first time around i used a normal SQL query, For Example:
select sysdate from dual;
Then i modified it to
DECLARE
x VARCHAR2 (4000);
BEGIN
x := x || 'select ';*
x := x || 'from ';
x := x || :p14_schema;
x := x || '.ddl_log@';
x := x || :p14_db_name;
x := x || '_DBAAPEX.TNTEWW.COM';
RETURN (x);
END;
Whereas on the second attempt i used the peice of code in question straight away. Its been a bit of a frustrating morning because i used a similar peice of code for a different application, nevermind tho :)
Thanks for your replys, much appreciated.
-N.S.N.O.

Csv no data found when using bind variables

Hi,
I have created a report, that uses 2 date variables to limit the query and rows display as they should. But clicking the csv link opens csv having one row stating 'No data found...'. If I set static values in place of variables, I get the right result. How could I use bind variables and get the right answer in csv (without coding my own function)?
Kaja

I am having the same problem.
The export link opens a new session without submitting the current page. The page item values are therefor not saved to cache before the export is undertaken.
Any report using page item bind variables in the where clause will not export correctly as the bind values are either null or those of the previous page submit.
Any ideas on how to get round this??

Query don't use the right index when using bind variables

Hi people !
I need some help because I have an issue with a query that don t use the right Indexes as it should
First of all, I have mainly three tables :
ORDER : Table that contains description for each Order (approximately 1 000 000 Records)
ORDER_MVTS : Table that contains the tasks made (called movements) to set up each Orders
with quantity of packages prepared for each product (approximately 10 000 000 Records)
PRODUCT : Tables that contains the products (approximately 50 000 Records)
When I launch the query with hard coded values, it brings back response very fast
because it uses the right index (ORDER_DHR_VALID) which represent the date and hour of the order
(with format 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'). The selectivity for this index is good.
NB 1: I have to use the trick " >= Trunc(date) and < trunc(date) +1 " to filter on a simple date because
the index contains hour and minutes (I know it wasn't probably a bright idea at conception time).
NB 2: The index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE is'nt discriminating enough because there is'nt enough different products.
It's the same for index on CUSTOMER_CODE and on MVT_TYPE so only the index on ORDER.DHR_VALID is good.
Here is the correct explain plan when I execute the query with hard coded values :
SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'))
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')) + 1
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = 1234
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
4 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
777 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 378119) --> ORDER_DHR_VALID
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
30 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377784) --> ORDER_MVTS_ORDER_FK
Now the problem is when the query is used in a Cursor with bind variables.
It seems like Oracle don't use index on ORDER.DHR_VALID because he can't figure out that he have
to actually filter on a short period of time (only one day).
So Oracle uses the index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE which is'nt a bright idea (it takes 10 secondes instead of just one)
Here is the bad explain plan :
Rows Row Source Operation
1 SORT AGGREGATE
2 NESTED LOOPS
722 NESTED LOOPS
2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
722 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
1790 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377777) --> ORDER_MVTS_PRODUCT_FK
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
1442 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378439) --> ORDER_PK
Now I have found two solutions to this problem :
1) using a Hint to force the use of index on ORDER.DHR_VALID (with /*+ INDEX(ORDER ORDER_DHR_VALID) */ )
2) Using Dynamic SQL and keeping the date hard coded (but not the other values except mvt_type)
For example :
QUERY :=
'SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) '||
AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) + 1 '||
AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = :CUSTOMER
AND PRODUCT.CODE = :CODE ';
These two solutions work but Number 1 is bad in theory because it uses a Hint
and Number 2 may be difficult to code.
So my question is : Does someone knows another solution to force the use of index ORDER_DHR_VALID that can be simple and reliable.
Thank you very much for support
Edited by: remaï on Apr 1, 2009 4:08 PM

What version of oracle you have? CBO work is different in 9i and 10g.
Usually cost based optimizer do not want to use index for >< condition with binding variables because optimizer can not use statistic to determine selectivity, and by default selectivity of <> operators is low.
(As I remember '>' selectivity by default is 5%, you have two conditions > and <, therefore resulting selectivity will be 0.05*0.05=0.0025 as two independent events, but selectivity of other conditions
ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY' or ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS' looks much better for CBO)
The best solution I see is do not use binding variables. Actually your query looks as searching query, which executes not so often, therefore you will not have perfomance win along of skipping execution plan creation.
Edited by: JustasVred on Apr 1, 2009 10:10 AM

Using Bind Variable in a SELECT

Hi,
I'm trying to build up my SQL query at run-time using bind variables and in the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) it says that 'After defining the bind variables, the next step is to reference them in the SQL statement. While SQL syntax allows bind variables to appear both in the SELECT list and in the WHERE clause, you'll typically use them in the latter context, as part of your WHERE clause.'.
However, when I try to use the bind variables in my SELECT list because I've had to set a type for the variable to String the variable gets inserted with inverted commas either side e.g. SELECT 'Service' FROM TestTable. Is it possible to use bind variables to insert a value into my select list without these inverted commas around it?
Thanks in advance,
Tom

OK, thanks for your response. Do you know of a way then where I can control my SELECT parameters programmatically? I'm currently trying to do it using the information in the chapter '35.9 Using Programmatic View Objects for Alternative Data Sources' from the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1). I think I'm part way there, would this be the correct way of acheiving what I want?
Cheers, Tom

Using bind variable with IN clause

My application runs a limited number of straight up queries (no stored procs) using ODP.NET. For the most part, I'm able to use bind variables to help with query caching, etc... but I'm at a loss as to how to use bind variables with IN clauses. Basically, I'm looking for something like this:
int objectId = 123;
string[] listOfValues = { "a", "b", "c"};
OracleCommand command = new OracleCommand();
command.Connection = conn;
command.BindByName = true;
command.CommandText = @"select blah from mytable where objectId = :objectId and somevalue in (:listOfValues)";
command.Parameters.Add("objectId", objectId);
command.Parameters.Add("listOfValues", listOfValues);
I haven't had much luck yet using an array as a bind variable. Do I need to pass it in as a PL/SQL associative array? Cast the values to a TABLE?
Thanks,
Nick

Nevermind, found this
How to use OracleParameter whith the IN Operator of select statement
which contained this, which is a brilliant solution
http://oradim.blogspot.com/2007/12/dynamically-creating-variable-in-list.html

Trying to pass array to stored procedure in a loop using bind variable

All,
I'm having trouble figuring out if I can do the following:
I have a stored procedure as follows:
create procedure enque_f826_utility_q (inpayload IN f826_utility_payload, msgid out RAW) is
enqopt dbms_aq.enqueue_options_t;
mprop dbms_aq.message_properties_t;
begin
dbms_aq.enqueue(queue_name=>'f826_utility_queue',
enqueue_options=>enqopt,
message_properties=>mprop,
payload=>inpayload,
msgid=>msgid);
end;
The above compiles cleanly.
The first parameter "inpayload" a database type something like the following:
create or replace type f826_utility_payload as object
2 (
3 YEAR NUMBER(4,0),
4 MONTH NUMBER(2,0),
83 MUSTHAVE CHAR(1)
84 );
I'd like to call the stored procedure enque_f826_utility_q in a loop passing to it
each time, new values in the inpayload parameter.
My questions are:
First, I'm not sure in php, how to construct the first parameter which is a database type.
Can I just make an associative array variable with the keys of the array the same as the columns of the database type shown above and then pass that array to the stored procedure?
Second, is it possible to parse a statement that calls the enque_f826_utility_q procedure using bind variables and then execute the call to the stored procedure in a loop passing new bind variables each time?
I've tried something like the following but it's not working:
$conn = oci_pconnect (....);
$stmt = "select * from f826_utility";
$stid = oci_parse($conn, $sqlstmt);
$r = oci_execute($stid, OCI_DEFAULT);
$row = array();
$msgid = "";
$enqstmt = "call enque_f826_utility_q(:RID,:MID)";
$enqstid = oci_parse($conn, $sqlstmt);
oci_bind_by_name($enqstid, ":RID", $row); /* line 57 */
oci_bind_by_name($enqstid, ":MID", $msgid);
while ($row = oci_fetch_array($stid, OCI_RETURN_NULLS+OCI_ASSOC))
++$rowcnt;
if (! oci_execute($enqstid)) /* line 65 */
echo "Error";
exit;
When I run this, I get the following:
PHP Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
ine 57
Entering loop to process records from F826_UTIITY table
PHP Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
ine 65
PHP Warning: oci_execute(): ORA-06553: PLS-306: wrong number or types of argume
nts in call to 'ENQUE_F826_UTILITY_Q' in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on lin
e 65
PHP Notice: Undefined variable: msgnum in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
ine 68
Error during oci_execute of statement select * from F826_UTILITY
Exiting!

Thanks for the reply.
I took a look at this article. What it appears to describe is
a calling a stored procedure that takes a collection type which is an array.
Does anyone from Oracle know if I can pass other database type definitions to a stored procedure from PHP?
I have a type defined in my database similar to the following which is not
an array but a record of various fields. This type corresponds to a payload
of an advanced queue payload type. I have a stored procedure which will take as it's input, a payload type of this structure and then enqueue it to a queue.
So I want to be able to pass a database type similar to the following type definition from within PHP. Can anyone from Oracle verify whether or not this is possible?
create or replace type f826_utility_payload as object
YEAR NUMBER(4,0),
MONTH NUMBER(2,0),
UTILITY_ID NUMBER(10,0),
SUBMIT_FAIL_BY VARCHAR2(30),
MUSTHAVE CHAR(1)
);

How to use bind variables in the following query

CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE MMDB.test IS
sel_qtn VARCHAR2 (10);
CURSOR PT_QUANTITY IS select * from mmdb.product_tree WHERE QUANTITY_CHECK ='E'
AND run_id = 100
a PT_QUANTITY%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
FOR i IN PT_QUANTITY
loop
sel_qtn := i.quanttity-1;
While sel_qtn>=1
loop
insert into mmdb.product_tree (BILLING_ACCOUNT_NO ,S_CODE) values (i.BILLING_ACCOUNT_NO ,i.S_CODE||'E');
sel_qtn :=sel_qtn -1;
End loop;
commit;
end;

Don't duplicate threads: How to use bind variables in the following query

Performance when using bind variables

I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
My first JAVA program runs without using bind variables as follows:
loop
stmt.executeUpdate("delete from nobind_test where id = " + i);
end loop
My second JAVA program uses bind variables as follows:
pstmt = conn.prepareStatement("delete from bind_test where id = ?");
loop
pstmt.setString(1, String.valueof(i));
rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
end loop;
Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
Thanks.

[email protected] wrote:
I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
The point is that you have to find out where your test is spending most of the time.
If you've just populated a table with 100,000 records and then start to delete randomly 2,000 of them, the database has to perform a full table scan for each of the records to be deleted.
So probably most of the time is spent scanning the table over and over again, although most of blocks might already be in your database buffer cache.
The difference between the hard parse and the soft parse of such a simple statement might be negligible compared to effort it takes to fulfill each delete execution.
You might want to change the setup of your test: Add a primary key constraint to your test table and delete the rows using this primary key as predicate. Then the time it takes to locate the row to delete should be negligible compared to the hard parse / soft parse difference.
You probably need to increase your iteration count because deleting 2,000 records this way probably takes too short and introduces measuring issues. Try to delete more rows, then you should be able to spot a significant and constant difference between the two approaches.
In order to prevent any performance issues from a potentially degenerated index due to numerous DML activities, you could also just change your test case to query for a particular column of the row corresponding to your predicate rather than deleting it.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

How to use bind variables in JSP applications ?

Hi,
How will i use bind variables in jsp applicaions ?
Any links that give a clear understanding ?
TIA,
jj

Hi,
Try this link, this may help you.
http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/WebScriptingForOracle.php
Thanks

How to use bind variables in this procedure

Hi Experts,
How to use bind variables in this procedure for static queries.
PROCEDURE DELETE_MER_PROC (M_id IN NUMBER)
IS
BEGIN
V_date DATE;
SELECT PD_DATE INTO v_date FROM PD_MAINTAIN;
    DELETE FROM MER_CLEAR
    WHERE MER_DT < v_date
    AND ID = M_ID;
COMMIT;
END;
How to use v_date and m_id as bind variables in this procedure to avoid hard parsing.
Please help me.
Thanks.

976208 wrote:
How to use v_date and m_id as bind variables in this procedure to avoid hard parsing.
You cannot avoid hard parsing - as the 1st time a SQL statement (like the SELECT or DELETE statements in your code) is encountered, it does not reside in the server's Shared Pool, and needs to be added into the pool via a hard parse.
Bind variables does not prevent hard parsing. Hard parsing happens when the SQL statement (with or without bind variables) is a brand new statement encountered by the server.
Bind variables enables the same SQL cursor to be reused, by simply changing the bind variable value.
Not using bind variables means that each SQL statement is unique and not shareable - as the value is hardcoded into the statement and cannot be changed via a bind value. This typically means LOTS of different SQL statements (where the only difference is the changed value in the statement) are created - with each statement being a new statement not seen before in the Shared Pool and needing to be hard parsed.
One does not design one's code not to be hard parsed. There ALWAYS will be a hard parse in order to get a SQL statement into the Shared Pool. One designs one's code to REUSE cursors in the Shared Pool.

How to use bind variables with XMLTABLE?

I tried to use bind variables with xmltable statment. Here, my testcase:
create or replace function wsdltest return xmltype as
l_dummy xmltype;
l_stt clob;
l_name varchar2(500);
l_xml clob;
BEGIN
l_xml :=
'<definitions name="F1" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/">
<types>
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xsd:element name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="A-VARCHAR2-IN" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="F1Output">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="RETURN" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
</types>
<message name="F1InputMessage">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:SVARCHAR2-F1Input"/>
</message>
<message name="F1OutputMessage">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:F1Output"/>
</message>
<portType name="F1PortType">
<operation name="F1">
<input message="tns:F1InputMessage"/>
<output message="tns:F1OutputMessage"/>
</operation>
</portType>
<binding name="F1Binding" type="tns:F1PortType">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="F1">
<soap:operation soapAction="F1"/>
<input>
<soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
</input>
<output>
<soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
<service name="F1Service">
<documentation>Oracle Web Service</documentation>
<port name="F1Port" binding="tns:F1Binding">
<soap:address location="http://localhost:8080/orawsv/XFILES/F1"/>
</port>
</service>
</definitions>';
-- OK
l_stt := 'select * from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES(''http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'' AS "XSD", default ''http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/''),
''//definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element[@name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input"]''
passing xmltype(:1)
columns
ab xmltype path ''.'' ) t';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_stt INTO l_dummy using l_xml;
-- ERROR ORA-01006
l_name := '"SVARCHAR2-F1Input"';
l_stt := 'select * from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES(''http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema'' AS "XSD", default ''http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/''),
''//definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element[@name=:2]''
passing xmltype(:1)
columns
ab xmltype path ''.'' ) t';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE l_stt INTO l_dummy using l_xml, l_name;
return l_dummy;
END;
Any idea ?
Thanks in advance
Cyryl

Why are you using dynamic SQL statements? Why not just use something like this instead in your PL/SQL. I also replaced the leading // in your Xpath with just / since you start from the root node.
select *
INTO l_dummy
from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES('http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' AS "XSD", default 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/'),
                '/definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element'
                passing xmltype(l_xml)
                columns
                ab xmltype path '.' ) t;Also, the above returns two rows, which I suspect is not what you want. Here is the pure SQL version for you to debug.
select *
from xmltable(XMLNAMESPACES('http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' AS "XSD", default 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/'),
               '/definitions/types/XSD:schema/XSD:element'
               passing xmltype('<definitions name="F1" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/">
<types>
<xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/orawsv/XFILES/F1" elementFormDefault="qualified">
<xsd:element name="SVARCHAR2-F1Input">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="A-VARCHAR2-IN" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
<xsd:element name="F1Output">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element name="RETURN" type="xsd:string"/>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
</types>
<message name="F1InputMessage">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:SVARCHAR2-F1Input"/>
</message>
<message name="F1OutputMessage">
<part name="parameters" element="tns:F1Output"/>
</message>
<portType name="F1PortType">
<operation name="F1">
<input message="tns:F1InputMessage"/>
<output message="tns:F1OutputMessage"/>
</operation>
</portType>
<binding name="F1Binding" type="tns:F1PortType">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/>
<operation name="F1">
<soap:operation soapAction="F1"/>
<input>
<soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
</input>
<output>
<soap:body parts="parameters" use="literal"/>
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
<service name="F1Service">
<documentation>Oracle Web Service</documentation>
<port name="F1Port" binding="tns:F1Binding">
<soap:address location="http://localhost:8080/orawsv/XFILES/F1"/>
</port>
</service>
</definitions>'
               columns
               ab xmltype path '.' ) t

ORA-01722: invalid number caused with SQL using bind variable

Hi,
Im am hoping that someone can help me resolve a problem thats only just services and is being experienced on quite a few clients.
our application uses C++ exes and makes OCI calls to the database.
what has happened in the last week or so, there has been quite a few invalid number errors being received on a prod server but strangly enough we cannot reproduct the error on our UAT system.
The sql is using bind variables and the information in the trace file shows that a number is being used for the bind variable, here is an extract from one trace file:
for some schemas, the bind variable value is some currupted value, i think:
oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=9a8d62b8 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
value="Â*d"
but on another schema, the value used is:
Bind#0
oacdty=01 mxl=32(32) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
kxsbbbfp=c5f92718 bln=32 avl=04 flg=05
value="2101"
however both produce invalid number errors.
I am relatively inexperienced as a DBA so would appreciate as much help as i can get.

Could you post your sql statement that is being run.
Also post the query plan from your uat system and the one from your production system (They are likely to be different)
You can export the stats from your production system and run them in your uat system. If you do this, then the execution plans should be the same on both systems(dbms_stats) and if you have the same data you should run into the same problem on uat as in production.
The root cause of this type of problem is having a column in a table which holds values which are of different datatypes. Typically there is a condition in the where clause which indicates that for example only numeric columns should be retrieved from the column which holds multiple data types. However since the optimizer is free to rewrite the query any way it sees fit, (It does not necessarily execute in the order the sql statement is written) it does not filter this data first, and therefore you hit non-numeric data and run into the invalid number error.
You can use little techniques like using an inline view with rownum in the column list, to perform the first filter. This ensures that the inline view is executed on its own, rather than being merged (materialized) with the rest of the query.
A quick temporary solution is to use a comparison like to_char(column_name) = variable
Make sure your comparisons are correct and it doesn't negatively impact on performance of the query

Using Bind variables in SQL PLUS Report

using Bind variables in SQL PLUS Report. This report gets the arguments from the application concurrent program. Now my need is to convert the start_date and end_date to bind Variables to improve the performance. I have commented the original code in 'prompt List of Unapproved Adjustments' and used my Bind Variable but it is giving an error
error: Bind Variable "ENDING_DATE" not declared
Report Date and Time:
26-OCT-2010 15:44:13
List of Unapproved Adjustments
Bind Variable 'ENDING_DATE" not declared
Please see below the code for the sql plus report:
define p_org_id = '&1'
define p_fy_begin_date = '&2'
define p_start_date = '&3'
define p_end_date = '&4'
define p_conversion = '&5'
declare
variable begin_date date;
exec :begin_date := p_start_date;
variable ending_date date;
exec :ending_date := p_end_date;
/* Begin
:begin_date := to_date('&p_start_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
:ending_date := to_date('&p_end_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS');
End; */
set newpage none
set termout off
set pagesize 55
set linesize 180
set heading on
set feedback off
set wrap off
set space 1
set heading on
begin
dbms_application_info.set_client_info('&p_org_id');
end;
prompt
prompt Report Date and Time:
prompt ----------------------
select to_char(sysdate,'DD-MON-YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
from dual ;
prompt
prompt List of Unapproved Adjustments
prompt -------------------------------
select b.trx_number,
a.adjustment_number,
f.user_name created_by
from apps.ar_adjustments a,
apps.ra_customer_trx b,
apps.fnd_user f
where a.customer_trx_id = b.customer_trx_id
and a.status <> 'A'
and a.created_by = f.user_id
and a.creation_date between :begin_date
and :ending_date
-- and a.creation_Date between to_date('&p_start_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
-- and to_date('&p_end_date','YYYY/MM/DD HH24:MI:SS')
order by
b.trx_number ;

Hi
Please go to customization part of the report and verify..You have set a default value out there ..And also verify your lov and look at the values ..If it is again giving you the problem ..pl delete the report and develop it again from the scratch it will be solved...
vishnu
null

How to use bind variables in desc flexfields in OA pages?

Use case: In EBS 11i we have a DFF on po_vendors and one of the segment has a table validated value set that is referencing a forms variable i.e :VENDORS.VENDOR_ID. Now after upgrading to R12 this won't work as the vendor pages moved to OA framework. Is there any way to reference the vendor_id column in OA framework?

976208 wrote:
How to use v_date and m_id as bind variables in this procedure to avoid hard parsing.
You cannot avoid hard parsing - as the 1st time a SQL statement (like the SELECT or DELETE statements in your code) is encountered, it does not reside in the server's Shared Pool, and needs to be added into the pool via a hard parse.
Bind variables does not prevent hard parsing. Hard parsing happens when the SQL statement (with or without bind variables) is a brand new statement encountered by the server.
Bind variables enables the same SQL cursor to be reused, by simply changing the bind variable value.
Not using bind variables means that each SQL statement is unique and not shareable - as the value is hardcoded into the statement and cannot be changed via a bind value. This typically means LOTS of different SQL statements (where the only difference is the changed value in the statement) are created - with each statement being a new statement not seen before in the Shared Pool and needing to be hard parsed.
One does not design one's code not to be hard parsed. There ALWAYS will be a hard parse in order to get a SQL statement into the Shared Pool. One designs one's code to REUSE cursors in the Shared Pool.

Re-using bind variables in Pro*C

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for