Read parked and posting document from one FM

Hi all,
IS theere any FM avaliable to read parked and posting document from one function module.
Please let me know if anything is there.
Thanks

Hi T,
have u searched in SE37 with words park?,i'm sure we have few FMs which will do the same.
regards
Prabhu

Similar Messages

HT204053 how do i move page and numbers documents from one icloud login to another?

how do i move page and numbers documents from one icloud login to another?
I had to change my email address whcih meant new apple login.
I have a number of docs in iwork/pages and iwork/numbers. How do I transfer them to my new login?

There's a couple of ways but my tip backing up your documents in the cloud is as good as any.

How to identify Parked and Posted Documents in GL Line Item Report

Is there any way to identify parked and posted documents in GL Line Item Report S_ALR_87012282? If i tick the parked documents in the further selection tab in the selection parameter, report will list all documents (parked and posted).
There is no available field in the layout. Is there any other way?
Thanks!

HI,
The other way to know the parked document details
use tcode: FBV3 - Display
OR
you can go to SE16 and enter table name VBKPF -Document Header for Document Parking
BSTAT = V
V = parked document
and ececute u will get the details of parked document.
Edited by: Manohar Mathkunti on Sep 13, 2008 11:11 AM

Parking and Posting Documents FEBP,F-21,FV60 and FB60

Hello All,
Could anybody please suggest me how is the Parking and Posting Take place in SAP.
And do some Transactions like F-21 had to be given with FB01/FB02?
If FB01 is given what are the restrictions?
Are there any specific SOD's involved..
Replies and links would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks

Parking is a temporary hold of data for the FI doc. You don't need to have all the required data to park. Parking does not impact the financials for a company.
Posting does impact the financials.
F-21 is a parameter tcode for FB01 - so you don't need to have FB01 to use F-21.
SODs ? Depends on what your SOD matrix is.

GL Park and Post Automation

I am in process for the GL Park and Post automation from current manual process.
Accountetn - Park
Mgr - Post
Mgr II - Post
1) 50,000.99 and below will park and post without approval
2) 50,001 to 20 M will require approval and post by next level manager
3) 20 m and all above have to approval and 2nd level approval would require.
4) If under scenario 2 primary level manager not available then in certain amount of time automation will trigger to next level manager for approval.
We have Cross Company with Multiple company codes
What test scenario i can use please help me

Hi,
Please do the following configuration :
1. Define Tolerance Groups for Employees (OBA4)
Menu Path
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Business Transactions --> Open Item Clearing --> Clearing Differences --> Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
In that create tolerance groups
This are the examples of tolerance groups. You can create of your own choice depending on amount.
2. Assign to users (OB57)
Menu Path
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Business Transactions --> Open Item Clearing --> Clearing Differences --> Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
In Username enter User ID and in Tolerance group enter Tolerance group created by you in OBA4.
Please do not delete User ID - SMITH
3. Give park and Post authorization. You can see user is able to park items in all cases but will be able to post only as per his / her tolerance limit.
Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
Regards,
Tejas

Controller role Park and Post

Hi Experts
Here's what I got.
I need roles for my customer to park and post documents. This is what he is asking for:
Controller Role: No park, only post
Cost Acct Role: Park and Post, but no posting their own parked docs
Acct Clerk Role: Can only Park
I asked that he send me the transaction codes they will be using for this. Also, I thought I would use tcode SU24 and identify which authorization objects need to be interrogated. Anyone have a better solution?
I was able to get the tcodes the customer wants to use:
FB50 would be post only.
FV50 would be park only.
Edited by: Jim McCollum on Sep 10, 2008 10:50 PM

Dear JIM,
There is a useful document with screenshots on this wonderful functionality of SAP and this has saved lot of writing.
Link: [Click here|http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-how-to-post-a-parked-document-fbv0/56/|Tip]
Trust this helps much and solves your problem!
Regards,
Ashok SINGH

Getting error Can't read from the source or disk when moving documents from one folder to another folder in the library

Hi,
When we try to move documents from one folder to another folder in the document library using "Open with explorer" getting beloe error.
Can read from the source file or disk.
The user having below permission for the Library as well as site.
Fullcontrol,Limited access--->Given directly
Read,Limited access--->Givin through the all Test grp
Contribute,Limited Access-->given through test members grp
Read,Limited access---> givin through The group grp
Could you please help me anyone....
Thanks

Hi Reddy,
If you are moving files in two libraries in different sites, then the error will occur and it is by design that there are limitations on the DAV move commands that the DAV client is respecting.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/6245f332-c609-4a7b-8e00-c8b5e46f7759/cant-move-files-using-windows-explorer-cant-read-from-source?forum=sharepointgeneral
If you are moving files in the same library, I recommend you to use Wireshark to reveal the error message and enable IIS
Trace Logging for Failed Requests to examine the IIS log file for troubleshooting.
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/47cd569d-98f2-4cca-b78e-fd178c097285/cant-read-from-the-source-file-or-disk?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
To narrow down the issue scope, I recommend you to test with another library and see if the copy in explorer can work.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

How to restrict the posting document from the parked user

Hi All,
Please help me in the below requirement
The requirement is, need to restrict the posting of document by the same user, who has parked the document.
For this I did the code changes in BTE: 00001140 by copying the function module:
u2018SAMPLE_INTERFACE_00001140u2019 into new function module asu2019 Y_IB_FI_PROCESS_00001140u2019
In this I have restricted as
IF ( sy-tcode = FV60 or
sy-tcode = FV50 or
    sy-tcode = FBV0 ).
IF i_parked = u2018xu2019. " document has already been parked
      READ TABLE t_bkpf INDEX 1.
      IF t_bkpf-usnam EQ sy-uname. " park user = current user ?
        t_exctab-okcod = 'BU'.    " do not allow to post
        APPEND t_exctab.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
This function module is getting trigger while parking and posting the documents
While posting the document, the parameter i_parkedu2019 is not getting the values as u2018Xu2019,
To get the values as u2018Xu2019 for the parameter: i_parked what can I do?
Can you please help me, is there configuration side need check?
Or do I need to write code some where else.
Thanks in Advance
Rambabu .A
Cross-post

Hi
Well, in such a case, it might be justified... BUt again, I would ask how would you differentiate between What USER1 can park and what can he post?... Certainly, it would be by means of fields like Doc Type, etc...
Else, if you leave it to the discretion of USER1 and give him both the authorizations, why would he like to park when he can post the doc?
Anyways, now coming to the BTE, each BTE uses a structure... For eg: BTE 1120 uses BSEG_SUBST... If the fields you desire are not available in the structure, then you can also enhance the structure... See if you can enhance the structures involved and achieve the result
Regards
Ajay M

I uploaded a document from my PC to one of my iPads using the Cloud and Pages. It appeared on both my iPads as it should have. But when I deleted that document from one of my iPads, it did not delete from the other iPad. Anyone know why?

I have no other info to add other than it is my understanding that if both my iPads are connected through the Cloud, if I delete a document from one of them, it should automatically be deleted off the other one. Thanks

Use the Office for Mac and ignore using Parallels for that. If you have PC only apps you have to run that are MS Windows only then consider Parallels. Just transfer your main PC, using Migration Assistant. If you don't know how then simply read over Pondini's article called Lion or Mountain Lion Setup Assistant tips and look for the section on migrating from a PC. Millions have done what you are about to, it's far from leading edge these days, if you go to an Apple Store to purchase they will offer this as a service, something you might be interested in.

IDCO for Parking and Posting of FI documents

Hi all,
Could you please help me the IDCO for Parking and Posting of FI documents.
Regards
Paul

Hi Gomathy,
Can you please confirm whether this IDOC is used to park or post FI documents, when I checked the documention of the IDOC it says it is used for posting , kindly confirm the same.
Regards
Dhanoo

Changes between park document and post document

Hi SAP Gurues
Depending upon the business practice at the time of posting the approver changes the figure once the document is posted.How to know what are the changes have been made between the parking and posting.How to know it?
Your kind cooperation is solicited.
sk

Hi,
It better to use save as completed - reason being when SAVE AS COMPLETED the entire document is checked for parking i.e, simulted before parking.
Eg,
If cost center us not assigned, then when SAVE AS COMPLETED the an error msg will pop up.
if you want user to use only SAVE AS COMPLETED then in FB00 you can set the indicator for each individual.
Hope this info is usefull.
Thanks
Sujai C

Park and Post for recuring entries

Hi,
Can anyone tell me is it possible to have SOD in park and post for recurring entries documents - f.14?
For the purpose of segregation of duties, I need accountant A to allow to create/park recurring entries but not post. Acccountant B will be allow to post the recurring documents created by account A.
Pls help.
Thanks.

Hi,
Here's my thoughts on this.
As it is Recurring entries is a two step transaction.
Have "Segregation of Responsibilities" at the time of creation of the Recurring entires itself.
and have the second person to post it. Of course you can prevent the second person from changing any thing in the recurring document.
Rather than Parking the recurring documents.
Regards,

Park and Post with ME22N

Hi All -
We are currently using ME22N to park and post a PO.
User with just the PO Processor role is now able to post with AR Approver role
(without the PO Approver role). The authorization objects related to
post are being shared across different modules. These object are
available in all the approver roles and it gives the ability for the
user to post a PO even without a PO Approver role.
It appears as if the F_FICA_FOG, F_FICA_FSG, F_FICB_FKR, and F_FMMD_MES
are being shared across multiple FI modules. One role has the park
(actvt 11) access (PO Processor) and the other role (AR Approver) has
posting capabilities (actvt 10).
We are leaning towards creating custom authorization objects to achieve this. We are trying to prevent Segregation of Duty conflicts in our system. Are there any standard was to prevent someone from posting a parked document in the purchasing module (a PO) if the person has access to post AR documents (AR Invoices)?

We decided to have the DEV team create a custom auth object and custom table to handle this issue. In the table there is a listing of activities, for example:
PO1 - PO Processor Park
PO2 - PO Approver Post
AR1 - AR Processor Park
AR2 - AR Processor Post
In the PO Processor role, in the custom object, the value would be PO1, and in the AR Approver, the custom object would have AR2. This will require a lot of testing. I hope this helps someone in that may have this problem in the future.
Edited by: T on Feb 10, 2011 9:43 AM

Regarding Parking and Posting access

Hi All,
The requirement for my client scenario is as follows:
There are about 6 company codes (lets name it as AAA) which need to be isolated based on the following rule:
Users belonging to AAA should be able to PARK as well as POST to all entities whereas Users belonging to other than AAA should not be able to POST to AAA. They should be able to POST to non AAA only and PARK everywhere.
Also a user who PARK's should not be able to POST.
Options which I have tried are -
- Created a separate role with activity 01 for the object F_SKA1_BUK and gave the AAA entities only and at the same time removed 01 activity for the same object in a separate role. The combination of these two roles gave the result as
- Was able to PARK and POST to AAA entities using FB01 (True)
- Was unable to post to other entities (Failed - user should have been able to)
- The person who parked was not allowed to Post (True)
The other combination with 01 activity to non-AAA entities and minus 01 activity to AAA entities:
- Failed to PARK to non AAA entities (Failed - user should have been able to) failed at 01 activity
- Was able to PARK to only non AAA. (True)
- Was unable to POST to AAA entities (True)
- The person who parked was not allowed to Post (True)
I came to know that this can be achieved by creating separate roles for posting and parking Tcodes and using SOD.
I have an already existing GL role - I removed all the posting tcodes in the original GL role so that it can allow only parking to all entities. Then I created a separate role and put all the Posting Tcodes in it and maintained the objects in the same was as they were maintained in the original GL role but here I have given only the AAA entities. Can some one help me in this approach.
Regards
Shakeel

The objects designed to protect posting of accounting documents directly in FI are F_BKPF, F_SKA1 protects the Chart of Accounts maintenance by company code.
You should generate two master roles, one with the activity 77 in all F_BKPF* Objects and other with activity 77 and 01
The first one only lets you parking documents. The second one parking and posting too.
Be careful with the tcodes you are going to use. The FB01 does not work if you don't have 01 in your authorizations for the F_BKPF_BUK object.
The Tcodes for excellence for parking documents are:
Invoices ( Vendors and Customer)
FV60
FV65
FV70
FV75
GL Documents
F-65
FV50
Regards!!

Can't move document from one folder to another

In the previous incarnation of Pages, right when it first developed Folders (a long overdue development), I was able to easily move a document from one folder to another on my MacBook, as well as my iPad.
Now, whenever I grab a document and try to drag and drop it into a new folder to move it, it won't let.
Did Apple actually remove this functionality from Pages?

Didn't have the Yosemite MBA powered up, so verified this on Mavericks with Pages v5.2.2. Since Apple has essentially frozen the Pages v5 codebase, figured this would also work on Yosemite.
Any application (e.g. TextEdit) that takes advantage of this titlebar feature can move documents in this manner.
In the Finder, you can move a document from one location to another by depressing the command key while dragging the file.
In Pages v5.2.2, with the document chooser open, I can use the preceding sentence move technique to move a file from an open folder into the Pages document chooser and it will automatically switch the Pages document chooser to inside that external folder — without launching the document. But, the command+drag feature does not work to move a document visible in the Pages v5.2.2 document chooser to another Finder location, or even into a folder visible within the document chooser.

Read parked and posting document from one FM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for