Reader 64 bit browser support

We would like to enable PDF file scanning from our graphing tool, but need Adobe to provide a 64 bit version of nppdf32.dll for browser support. We provide this scanning functionality from the 32 bit versions of Ansys Simplorer and Ansys Maxwell, but eliminate the PDF option for our 64 bit versions, because the CHtmlView we use won't load PDF files. The technical world is moving rapidly to 64 bits. Where is Adobe?

There is currently no 64-bit plugin available, but I have a strong feeling that it will be there in Reader 12.

Similar Messages

Adobe Flash Player 64 Bit Browser

Look Here:
I just talked with adobe customer support,,,,they are working on 64 bit flash player,, Java has 64 bit browser support now,,,they have written that after flash player release 10.1 which is released, they are working on 64 flash player support and will release,,understand,, that not only do they have to revamp the code, they have to setup server time and bandwidth for probably 100 million downloads, this is a massive release,, thus,,,say something encouraging, while they get this done for us,,,further,, many companies are not even working on 64 bit support for browsers( not mozilla, though), all of the virus companies Microsoft, ect have no or little 64 bit browser add ons,, they need to get busy. Hooray for adobe 64 bit browser add on support, maybe adobe reader and shockwave player will be up next,,,
                                                              Cheers
                                                             3Fees

Further,,,,,,,,,,Adobe personnel has to besides set up server time and bandwith, they have to make a setup.exe file, zip file, digital certificates for the downloads for the adobe 64 bit flash player browsers add on( more than one browser) Firefox 4 has 64 bit browser and is being worked on, they also need to chat with 3rd party person to get permission, authorizations, ect as there software is copyrighted ,also,,,,,, a meeting of the minds so as to speak, and a legal document generated as to agreement,,,there is much more of course........Like beta testing,ect,, we do want it debugged and secure.Microsoft and others need to get supportive about this and get there end straightened out,, they get paid enough, if Microsoft needs help in this area,, I can point them in the right direction where code programmers are trained and chuse microsoft as employer, not oracle or the State of Washington.
                                                                 Cheers, Y'all
                                                                     3Fees

When will Flash Player support my 64-bit browser?

I have had my new Windows 7 PC for a couple of weeks now. When I first got it, I kept getting messages telling me I needed to install Adobe Flash Player in order to get the full experience of a website. So I installed the Flash Player. Subsequently at many websites I got a pesky message about the Flash Player. (I forget the precise content of the message, but I'm sure many people using 64-bit browsers are familiar with it.)
I went to Adobe's site and discovered that the Flash Player did not support 64-bit browsers. Adobe's recommended solution for this disturbing news was that I install and run a 32-bit version of Internet Explorer, and Adobe didn't exactly lead me by the hand in explaining how I should do that. I was told to go to Microsoft and get help there. Yeh, right! Suddenly I'm thinking about a couple of hours of hassle. Nevertheless I browsed over to Microsoft and clicked to a few pages. I did not find any easy-to-follow instructions on how to uninstall my 64-bit Internet Explorer 8 and install a 32-bit version.
Is Adobe advising me to take a step backward? Is, or is not, 64-bit browsing better than 32-bit browsing?
I did not, and have not, installed the 32-bit Internet Explorer. Instead I found help at Adobe for uninstalling the Flash Player. Those pesky messages are history.
I really have not noticed any difference in quality between my former 32-bit browsing and my present 64-bit browsing, with and without the Flash Player. My browsing experience has been good, and I think the Flash Player adds nothing significant. Surely it adds nothing critical. Windows Vista has come and gone without Adobe providing support for its 64-bit version. Maybe the same thing will happen for Windows 7. So be it. If a Flash Player comes out that supports 64 bits, then I will use it. If Flash Player never supports 64 bits, then I'll never again use Flash Player.
I saw another post here, a fairly recent one, where a replier said that about 70% of Internet browsers are still using Windows XP. (I guess more than 90% of those use 32-bit browsers.) Okay, I believe that, but what about the other 30%? If only a measly 5% of all Internet browsers use 64 bits, that's a hell-of-a-lot of people. Surely thousands, maybe millions. Are all these people to be fobbed off? Does Adobe really have something more important to work on?
Should Adobe be condemned for its lassitude regarding 64-bit support? I think so, but what about the horde of websites that features the Flash Player? Knowing well that there are thousands, or millions, of people using 64-bit browsers, should not those websites and their organizations also be condemned?

Frankly I think Adobe is treating its customers shabbilly in this regard. There is a much larger 64 bit windows installed base than 64 bit linux, yet adobe have released the 64 bit linux support first, and not even announced the 64 bit windows version in any way for over a year.
Come on Adobe, we understand you and Microsoft are competitors, but don't let your users get caught in the cross fire. There are now close to as many computers running 64 bit windows than there are running any version of linux, or any version of mac os, 32 bit included.
It has been over a year and a half since Adobe even updated its position on this issue on its web site. Search bing for 64 bit flash and you get 32 million hits. 64 bit windows is nearly 3 years old as a released product, and 4+ years in terms of dobe having access to it.
Adobe, surely at the very least, you owe it to your customers to tell them when you plan to address this.

Open Reader in 64-bit browser

How can I get Reader X or XI to open in a 64-bit browser window?

You can't. The Adobe Reader plugin is strictly 32-bit and won't work on a 64-bit browser.

Flash player will not install because it is not supported on a 64 bit browser?

What do I do? Help please. I have windows vista.

Flash Player will not install on my 64 bit system with Vista also. It wants a 32 bit browser. I don't
know what that is or I would get it ???????????????? ...Please HELP...Mine is HP Pavilion dv-1130us
entertainment Notebook Thanks LS June 22

Cant install on a 64-bit browser

I cant download Flash Player on my computer. I get redirected to a page that tells me:
Adobe Flash Player is not supported for playback in a 64-bit browser. However, you can run Flash Player in a 32- browser running on a 64-bit operating system. How do I fix this?

Flash Player does not yet support 64-bit web browsers, It does however support 32-bit Web Browsers on 64-bit operating systems.
To resolve your issue run Internet Explorer 32 bit. (In Vista it's the one with the plain title "Internet Explorer" rather than the one that says "Internet Explorer (64-bit)" or install another 32-bit web browser. such as Firefox
I hope this could be of some help to you.

Adobe Reader 64 Bit

From what I can gather, there is no roadmap for supporting 64 bit browser plugins/Reader.
Is that correct?
If so, it's mind boggling considering how many enterprise customer's depend on the the browser plugin. Is Adobe ever planning to support a 64 bit Reader? Does anyone know?

Those that know cannot say, they are under non-disclosure agreements. However, I can tell you that I have heard nothing about 64-bit support.Many enterprise customers may depend upon a browser plug-in. But my bet is that vast majority of enterprise customers are running 32-bit systems. Heck, most of them may be still running XP.

I need to know how to run Flash Player in a Vista 32-bit browser running on a 64-bit O.S.

Help please ! I have been reading for days, trying everything to find the answer to my dilemma, which BTW is making it impossible to use our new computer now. Every other minute it seems I get the message that I need to run Flash Player in a VISTA 32-bit browser which is actually running on a 64-bit operating system. Do I have to uninstall a program (what and where is it) and then instal something else (from where etc.)?
Give me back our XP! I get the idea that Adobe keeps SAYING they are developing a platform for Adobe Flash to run on a 64-bit, but I fear that is only a stall. Who is responsible for helping neophytes? No matter how many times I have tried to contact Adobe, it is a joke. One time, even though I do not have a subscription for service, the poor man took pity on me. But his Indian accent was so severe I have ZERO idea what he was saying. Can one of you wonderful, erudite, helpful people out there give me the solution in computer language 101?? I will be forever grateful. I wish our computer "guru" had been smart enough to give us the pros and cons when he suggested Vista and 64..... When I am asked for a serial number even I have no earthly idea how to get that either. I feel completely HELPLESS and SLEEPLESS in Tucson. Thanks SOOOO much to whomever can get me going in the right direction. (Forgive my LONG message. I had to vent. I feel better.) CLOWG

Hi Clowg,
Sorry to hear that you are having trouble. Unfortunately, I don't believe the folks here on this forum will be able to help you with your issue. Have you tried posting on the Flash Player forum?
http://forums.adobe.com/community/webplayers/flash_player
Regards,
Fang

Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2)

Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2).
Edited by: 867760 on Aug 18, 2011 3:36 PM

No, it is not supported as a server.
Please refer: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/oracle-hyperion-epm-system-certific-131801.xls for supported versions.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Why isn't my browser supported?

One of the challenges of delivering desktop-quality software
inside a browser is, well, the browser itself. For more details on
our approach to browser support, its challenges, etc. please see
the posting on the Acrobat.com blog.
http://blogs.adobe.com/acom
Browsers aren't all the same, and there is a fair amount of
work to get things working right, especially with keyboard
shortcuts and the clipboard. We've focused on the most common
browsers first: Firefox (Mac & Windows), Internet Explorer 6
and 7, and Safari 3.
For example: We’d like to follow convention and provide
the typical Cmd-B shortcut to make text bold. However, Firefox on
the Mac uses Cmd-B to open bookmarks in the sidebar; so Buzzword
was forced to use Ctrl-B for making text bold.
For
Firefox under Linux, we're providing limited support. We
have done some testing and we believe it works well, but we're
interested in your feedback. Please be sure to upgrade to the
latest Linux version of Flash Player 9 available at
http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer,
and also be sure to adjust your preferences as described in the
initial page you'll see when visiting the application in Firefox
under Linux.
Other browsers may work (Opera, Camino, etc.) to some extent,
but we can’t make assurances that all functions will work.
We appreciate hearing from users who want to give Buzzword a
spin under non-supported browsers, as it helps us focus our efforts
and testing.

Hi,
After trying Opera AND Firefox to post a reply to "Why isn't my browser supported?" I'm now using IE (7 not 8 - that's not working, too!). Maybe that's the first thing that should work in all browsers - the forum.
The second thing, and that's why I originally wanted to post something here, is that I had problems typing "&" and "/" in Opera. They don't seem to be at the same key as usual. (I have a german keyboard...):
Shift + ^1234567890ß´
Key (normal): °!“§$%&/()=?`
Key (buzzword): ^!@#$%^&*()ß`
Additionally everything seems a little bit slow...
Regards,
Ireen

Acrobat form field that allows Reader user to browse and insert a picture into a predefined area

Is there a way to do insert a form field into an AcroForm that allow Reader users to browse and insert a picture into that form field?
I know that LiveCycle can do this, but I need to do this using an AcroForm. Or maybe there's a third-party plug-in that can be used in an AcroForm to do this?

Jay,
The new version of Reader, which was announced today (see AcrobatUsers.com), will now allow you to use the field.buttonImportIcon method: http://livedocs.adobe.com/acrobat_sdk/9.1/Acrobat9_1_HTMLHelp/JS_API_AcroJS.88.737.html
For a bit more information, see: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/743823
Here's the minimum code that can be used in the Mouse Up event of a button that's configured with a layout that's something other than "Label only":
// Mouse Up script for a button
event.target.buttonImportIcon();
Since this isn't backwards compatible with Reader, you'll probably want to add additional code to test what version is being used and alert the user if it's pre-11. You should also check the return value to see if anything went wrong. The hard part is getting everyone to upgrade, but this and a number of other features should make it worth it.

Did Adobe Acrobat/reader stop providing browser integrated PDF viewing(addin) for Internet Explorer?

Did Adobe acrobat and reader stop providing browser integrated PDF viewing capability for Internet Explorer?
Hi, I have been trying to view PDF's directly on my browser (Internet Explorer 9). We used to be able to have this available. To be honest last configuration that did work was Internet Explorer 8 with Adobe Acrobat 7. But I recently tried with Intenet Explorer 9 with Adobe Acrobat X and did not work as expected (I tried to activate the add in for Adobe but the adobe addin for PDF did not show up) I have the following questions:
1) Do you still provide PDF's viewing capabilties on Internet Explorer?
2) If yes: Is there a propper Add-in we (users) are able to install for Internet Explorer?
3) if yes: Do we require to have Adobe Acrobat to have this capability? (this was my experience with IE8 and Adobe Acrobat 7)
Additional Info:
There seems to be an addin for Chrome wich works as expected (opens PDF in browser) to this current date. This does not happen on IE.
Thanks in advance.
AlbertCastle

Are you using the 64-bit edition of Internet Explorer?
The Adobe Reader/Acrobat plugin is 32-bit, and will not work on a 64-bit browser.
Other possibilities: http://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/using/display-pdf-browser-acrobat-xi.html

Is FF 3.6.13 a 32 or 64 bit browser?

I have Windows 7 64 bit. I cannot play AVI videos now. Some suggestions were to convert the AVI to WMV format, or to fix the problem with FF 32 bit for Windows. I can't seem to find that information. I read that FF doesn't have a true 64 bit browser yet. The videos won't play in Windows Live Movie Maker, Windows Media Player, Irfanview Player, or VLC Media Player. I don't have Quicktime because I don't want to mess with I-Tunes.
Also, I've tried to save FLV videos from online. It seems that my Adobe Flash player might not be working properly. It's Adobe Flash Player 10 ActiveX and I have the plug-in for it.

I failed to mention that FF is my default browser.

Multiple Browser Support in Webcenter

What are the code changes that are to be made to have Multiple browser support in Webcenter?
what is done in Webcenter to provide to browser independent UI
e,g in jsp , we usually write javascript
if browser is this, do this
else do this
kind of logic

Even When I use JSTL and have modified the code to the following
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
xmlns:c="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core"
xmlns:fn="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/functions"
xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>
<f:view>
<af:document id="d1">
<af:form id="f1">
<c:choose>
<c:when test="${fn:containsIgnoreCase(header('User-Agent'), 'MSIE 6.0')}">
<c:out value="Its IE6"/>
</c:when>
<c:otherwise>
<c:out value="Its others"/>
</c:otherwise>
</c:choose>
</af:form>
</af:document>
</f:view>
</jsp:root>
i get error on compile that says
Error(12,16): The function "header" for prefix "" can not be found in the specified tag library.

I recently upgraded to Mavericks from Snow Leopard. Does Snow Leopard still exist on my Mac? If so, is it possible to restart under Snow Leopard in order to run PowerPC apps? If not, is there an OS available in 64 bit that supports PowerPC apps? Mav ***.

I recently upgraded to Mavericks from Snow Leopard. Does Snow Leopard still exist on my Mac? If so, is it possible to restart under Snow Leopard in order to run PowerPC apps? If not, is there an OS available in 64 bit that supports PowerPC apps? Mav ***.

The only reason I upgraded to Mavericks was because my Snow Leopard OS was 32 bit, which I was told would support only 4GB of RAM.
That wasn't quite right. You can put in as much RAM as your Mac's hardware supports. The division is in the apps themselves. A 32 bit app can't use more than 4 GB or RAM. A 64 bit app can use much more.
For example, as a 32 bit only version, Photoshop CS3 can't use more 4GB of RAM, no matter how much you actually have installed. CS4 or later can use all the RAM you want to throw at it.

Reader 64 bit browser support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for