REAL INTERNAL ORDER

hi
I created a real internal order for CWIP and order is half completed, what will be treatement for month end closing.
This order will be continue for 3 months. please explain detail process.
thanks
sapian

1. Go to KO88 give order number, period, fiscal year and asset valuation date, and select processing type as automatic and executive.
The order costs are transferred from relevant expense account to CWIP account.
2. If you want to transfer this CWIP account to main asset account, again go to KO88 and take processing type as full settlement and executive
This time, cost are transferred from CWIP to main asset.
If you want to keep amount only in CWIP upto the completion of total work, run full settlement only after three months.
Regards
Radha

Similar Messages

Depreciation posting to real internal order in ECC 6.0

Hello SAP experts,
Our business scenario is we want to post the depreciation calculated on asset to Real Internal Order and not Cost Center. We are implementing in ECC 6.0.
Q1 - what are the basic configuration required
Q2 - Internal order created will have which object - Overhead or Production or Investment.
Please reply .
abhay

Dear Abhay,
You can check the Screen Lay out rules for your asset master data under Logical Field Group - Time Dependent Data. Normally you don't have Internal Order as a selection option for posting depreciation. However check there if you can insert field group for internal order as well there.
Regards,
Sanjay

Real internal orders to statistical

Hi Gurus,
Could you please let me know if we can change the already existing real internal orders to statistical orders.
If so, please provide me the information on where we can do it.
Thanks
Sri

Hi Sri,
Go to transaction code KOT2_OPA and double click on the order type, i guess you are using order layout, if so click on the button "field selection", which take you to another screen, scroll down and you would find a field "Identifier for statistical order", for this field select the radio button under Input, this would allow you to select the Statistical order button while creating the internal order.
For changing the settlment profile to 90, would not allow you to settle the costs to any object. Please keep in mind, if you have orders with balance, changing the settlement profile to 90 would not allow you to settle the costs to the receiver and the order would always balance and this might impact your reports.
Let me know if you have further question.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
gj

PM Order Settlement to Cost Center(real) & Internal Order simultaneously

Dear Experts.
I have a request from client to settle 100% of PM order to Cost Center (real) and internal order (statistical) simultaneously. The purpose of statistical orders is to capture all the expenses (electricity, water, security charges, maintenance, etc...) location-wise.
PM Order settlement through statistical IO will contribute to the maintenance aspect, and other expenses will be captured to statistical IO through financial GL posting. Hence each location will have a unique statistical order maintained.
In the settlement Profile, I have maintained Order and Cost Center elements as "Settlement Optional" Under "Valid receivers". But the system doesn't allow this settlement. As per my understanding SAP allows settlement (100%) to go only to a single object.
Appreciate your inputs on this matter.
Thanks,
thushantha.

hi,
Please check how you maintained the real object in the settlement rule.
You must maintain both the cost center and internal order on the same assignment line such as:
CAT:     Settlement receivers
ORD      ORD_Number   Cst_Center_number         100%   PER
The system will correctly generate KI178 if you have the following:
CAT:     Settlement receivers
ORD      ORD_Number                              100%   PER
CTR      Cst_Center_number                       100%   FUL
regards
Waman

Availability control not activated - Real Internal Orders

Hi Experts,
I have created one order type with Object class overhead, budget profile 0000001. Defined Tolerance Limits for Availability Control. And I have created one order and maintained budget. If postings are exceeding the budget, system is simply saving it not giving any alerts. I have done KO30, system showing the message "Availability control not activated in any further objects". Where I am missing the configurations?
Regards,
Rajeswari

Hi,
Check whether the commitment management has been activated.
Check in transaction OKKP for Order management & commitment mangement active in controlling area level.Check the company code assignment also in controlling area.
Then check the activation of the Activate Open-Item Management in Order Types in Tcode KOAO.
whether commitment mangement tick is active against the order type.
Activate the availability control as automatic orelse activate when you assign budget in KO22 transaction.
Check both the setting.In some case it may not work in DEV server if you active later,Transport request to QAS & check it will work.
Regards,
Raj

Real and Statistical Internal Orders

Dear all
Is it possible to create a statistical internal order and specify another internal order for the actual postings as opposed to a Cost Centre?
Thank you for your help.
Thanks
Peter

Sincere apologies. My client only posts to Internal Orders with WBS elements for planning and budget perposes. The client wishes to monitor expenses for particular members of staff who are entitled to financial benefits. In order to benefit from avaiabilty control it was suggested either to create an real internal order for each member of staff or alternatively create a statistical order to do this with costs updated in the operational order. I believe the second option in not possible.
Thank you
PRG

Internal Order Down Payment settle to Asset

Hi,
I have a requirement related to Down Payment shows in Order. User want that if there is any down payment against purchase order & purchase order contain real order, they want that FBL1N/FAGLL03 report show Order Number in reports. So that down payment can be traced against Internal Order.
Now I have tested the whole scenario. everything is ok till down payment. I can seen Order number in FBL1N report and also in FAGLL03 report.
Now the problem is here,
Real Internal Order is created which will be settle to AUC asset.
Purchase order is made with Assignment category 'F' . Real Internal Order is mention with GL.
Now Down Payment is made against Purchase Order with mention Purchase Order. I can see in FBL1N report.
Now when i am going to settle Internal Order to asset, there are errors which are rectified by configuring. But when i see AUC asset, down payment is also settle on asset.
If Purchase Order is raised with amount 1500000.
Down Payment is made with amount 50000
when i settle Internal Order 1500000 & 50000 also settle on Asset.
I dont want to settle 50000 on asset and when i see KOB1 report, i only see 1500000 amount.
Or is there any report in which i can extract Order with down payment data. I can develop Z report but i want to do it in standard.
Waiting for reply....
Regards
AJ

For Down payment data,
you need to use FBL1N transaction.
probably, down payment will not reflect in internal order. Expense GL with Internal order will reflect in the internal order actual values.
Thanks
Sudhir Krishna Kumar Singh

Internal orders to track rev and cost

Hi
How to track revenue and cost, related to utilization of land using internal order and offset revenue against cost..
Pls advice? What we can use on this statistical internal order on real internal order ????
Pls advice in details ... Thank you in advance

HI,
If at all you want to use Internal order for this purpose, you have to create a real internal order only for settlement purpose. Statistical IO can not be settled.
Try once.
Regards
Sarma BH

Internal order authorization issue

Dear Sir/Madam
We want to restrict the authorization for posting entries into internal order.
Our users are authorised to pass entry through T code FB01- where they use the gl account which is internal order mandatory. they are putting the real internal order and passing the entry.
We want to restrict the users authorisation for using the real order. It has to be restricted to only limited users.
Kindly help us how can we control this authorisation
Thanks & Regards
Prashant P.Zinge

Hi Prashant,
Here is my suggestion:
1. Create a basic set with GS01 for user group who are allowed to post to internal order. Also, create basic set for internal order also.
2. Now, in validation check for system-user name and syste-tcode. User name should be in user name set and tcode should be FB01.
If every thing goes well allow user to post the transaction otherwise give an error message.
This is just a draft, details you need to check while doing these activities.
Please let me know if it helps!!
Regards,

Plan data on Statistical Internal Order

Dear gurus,
Presently we have real internal orders for the projects but now we are diverting from real Internal Order to Statistical Internal Order. Before we use to plan data on the real internal order. My concern is by changing the IO to statistical, would it impact on the Plan data? How can we approach the Planning data in the statistical Internal Order?
Also while creating Statistical Internal Order, the system does not allows to select Plan-Integrated Order field. What is the signficance and by not selecting this field, this does impact the plan data on the statistical IO
Thank you in advance
Regards

Diverting to Statistical order,system will not allow you make settlement. if you need only for information purpose, then u can adopt the statiscal order.
System will not allow to select statistical indicator & Indicator for Integrated Planning. you will only select one option. u can only select with real indicator
by selecting the "Indicator for Integrated Planning"activity inputs planned are updated
directly on the sending cost center if 'Integrated planning with Cost Center Accounting' is activated in the version. You can then also settle plan-integrated orders/projects to cost centers.which only possible with Real order
I hope this will be helpful

Procument through Internal Order

Hi
We got few real internal orders (overhead) where it got a budget value and a settlement rule to be settled to a cost center
When raising PO, we use F (Internal Order) as the account assignment adn the double entry is passed to debiting as asset account and crediting GRIR account. But during month ends when the internal orders are settled, it does not settle because its a balance sheet account. Account assignment A is used because we wanted the asset to be assertized at the time of procument
What I need to know is that the process that we have use is correct or not.?? Is it correct to use an internal order at the time of the PO OR do we need to use a WBS at the time of the PO
Following account assignment categories are used
A (Asset), F (Internal Order), Q (WBS)
Thanks
Trishan

Hi,
You are trying to control the budget through the Internal Order and at the same time capitalize (create the Asset) during the GR posting. Then why the Internal Order is having a settlement rule for settling to Cost Center?
Create the PO with account assignment to Internal Order (Posting to a Cost Element and not a Balance Sheet Account). Then during the month-end, the IO should be settled to FXA (Fixed Asset). The settlement rule of the IO should point to FXA and not Cost Center. WBS can also be used instead of these real Internal Orders.
Thanks,

Inaccurate JE hitting wrong Internal Order

Hi
We got a journal entry posted during the month of February through FI (FB50). The JE got one P&L a/c (debit) and balance sheet a/c (credit). The P&L entry consist of a real internal order..That particular internal order consist of a budget (KO22) as well JE was posted for February without any errors. Budget also consumed accurately. The internal order was settled (KO8G) during the month end for the month of February and it had hit the respective cost center without errors.
This month we realized that the JE should not have been used an internal order. It should hit only a cost center. Not an internal order.
How to correct this entry? Please let me know the steps.. Budget also need to be revised to the original figure
Thanks

Hi Srikanth
Thanks for the reply
The orginal JV was posted by,
Debit - Expense (with internal order)
Credit - Bank
Internal order was settled during the month end and it has hit the cost center.
If I do the JV you mentioned, dont you think the cost center value will be double coz the settlement of the internal order has hit the cost center as well?
What will happen if I reverse the JV through FB08 and put a new JV with correctly..and suppliment the budget through KO24?? I guess the internal order problem will not get sorted if I do that right??
Thanks

Why does internal order can exceed budget ?

i use real internal order 400001 . set budget at KO22 year 2008 = 100 (post not over 100)
config at t-code KOT2_OPA budget profile = 000001
and set order availability control : tolerance limits = 100 (error message)
but when i post expense at FB60 i use internal order 400001
to get value 5000. document can post and saved.
please tell me .
1 why internal order can post exceed budget 100 ?
2 can i use statistical internal order to check budget ?
Edited by: dittaporn nanasilp on Oct 16, 2008 5:36 AM

Hi
1.Check in OPTK whether you have exempted that cost element.
2.Check tolerance limit is set for "all activity groups"
3.Use KO31 to reconstruct availabilty control.
Regards

Internal Order Settlement by Amount

Dear Experts,
I have created a real internal order which has settlement profile by amount.
Now the scenario is, if I am booking an expense to this order in 1st month say of Rs. 1000, i want it to settle only Rs. 200/- to COPA in that period. again in next month i would again settle say Rs. 500 to COPA.
But, when I am settling the order in first month with Rs. 200, order gets settled completely. hence, the message is coming that the sender completely settled.
pl. suggest me that correct way to do this..
Thanks in Advance.
Warm Regards,
Sayu

Hi,
Now I could do the settlement by amount, but now the problem is that the system is allowing me to settle more than the debits in the order.
e.g. Debits to Order are 1000
in 1st period i have settled 800
in 2nd period, it is allowing to settle more than 200.
Regards,
Sayujya

Internal order with a budget

I have a real internal order with a budget.
In case I create the settlement of the internal order by period end- how this will impact from the budget point of view
(I am steeling the cost with the original account to a cost center).
I mean to say- will the system refer the settlement as a deduction in cost - so i will have more available budget- this is a scenario I am not interested in.
How can i solved this conflict (in case this conflict is in place).

Hi
If you are settling to a Budget controlled object i.e. the receiver also has a budget on it - In that case, settlement would release the budget from sender IO
Else, it does not
br, Ajay M

REAL INTERNAL ORDER

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for