REALTEK AUDIO DEGRADING OVER TIME WITH FLME - PC WINDOWS 7

I am having a real issue with the onboard Reatek audio card and The Flash Live Media Encoder. I am providing the signal to the onboard Realtk audio card via the mic in source on my computer. The video is coming from my DV cam. At first, the audio sounds fine but after a period of time, the audio begins to degrade until it becomes totally useless - muffled and weak. If I use the onboard DV mic, it's OK. Problem seems to be with the onboard Realtek card. Some times it appears to be related to making some changes in the FLME settings. If I reboot the computer, it fixes it for a while and then the problem starts again. Running a PC with Windows 7. Anyone else, experiencing this? I have had the same problem on two different machines.

There is no way to do it from windows direct to the TC.
It only presents AFP to the WAN side. And most ISP block SMB from internet access due to risks. There is AFAIK, no suitable AFP protocol utility for windows at the moment. If you google and find one, be aware it probably will not work to your satisfaction anyway.
You must use a Mac to access AFP but even then it is not a secure protocol and I would recommend against it anyway.
So basically if you had have asked before purchasing, I would have said, TC is unsuitable product. It is a backup drive for a Mac. It is not a NAS.. it is not designed for remote access by any computer other than a Mac. It does not support any other file protocol to the WAN interface.. and no secure protocol even there.
A NAS with Time Machine extensions from QNAP, Synology, Netgear all are designed for web access and are far more suitable. Researching a purchase beforehand is always worthwhile.
Anyway, your choices are.. return the TC and buy something more suited to the job.
Or if return is now impossible sell the TC on ebay.. etc and do the same thing.. buy a more suitable NAS.
Or buy a cheap mac mini (even second hand) and use that for communications with home.
Or, replace your current router with something that includes vpn. This is actually a good and commercially sound decision. VPN is generally used by business to connect to remote locations, because it is secure and will allow the greatest flexibility of connection. How hard or easy depends on the current setup. I would recommend a combined modem router with vpn server if you have adsl. Or for cable you can find plenty of routers with combined vpn. You can also use those for adsl if your ISP allows pppoe with bridged modem. The TC will have to be bridged as well. For other broadband it might be harder to find the right kind of box.
Once you setup a vpn you can access it from work using the appropiate vpn client in your work computer.

Similar Messages

Internet performance degrades over time with AirPort Extreme

Hello, we have an AirPort Extreme (802.11n) which is about two years old, and I've noticed lately that if I don't reset it for say, a month or so, internet speeds become extremely slow, and there is no way to regain normal speeds without resetting it... I was just wondering if this is normal for an AirPort Extreme, and also, could this be due to the age of the unit (i.e. do AirPort Extremes slowly lose performance over time, and is buying a new one the only answer)? Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!

U have to find a good channel.
on 2.4ghz this is 6 unless other routers in the area are using it. if so use another channel.
Other things that can interfere: Microwave oven, frige - any thing that emits em fields
5ghz is better.
vicinity of your laptop makes a big difference - i get up to 57Mbps on speedtest net in vicinity of time capsule @ 5ghz.
Best performance is on ethernet cable.
Hope this helps

Movie degradation over time

I have sometimes had movies degrade over time. I have one specifically that I am looking at now that is a gray scale microscopy movie was made in 2006 with Cinepak and looked fine when first made. Now the first frame and several other frames (but not all) are dramatically posterized to a uniform gray. Sometimes I have seen a different degradation where you get blocks of pixels that turn uniform gray was if you reduced the resolution of the image. Is this a Cinepak issue or a Quicktime issue? Is there any way of recovering the data or preventing it from happening?

Grandpa,
Sadly, writable media DOES degrade over time - sometimes after a year or so. Cheap media (and sometime not-so cheap media), improper storage conditions (hot, sunlight, high humidity) and high burn errors during burning (result of high burn speeds over 4x) can all contribute to degradation.
Roxio's new Toast Titanium 8 now includes the ability to recover data from some damaged discs - it's probably worth trying.
Problems with the long term storage of digial images remain digital imaging's 'diry little secret' - see http://www.frontiernet.net/~fshippey/archiving.htm for an article I wrote on the subject.
F Shippey

Ever since installing on my 64bit Windows 7 install, Firefox has continually gotten more sluggish as time moves on, hangs for 10-15 secs at a time and just gets worse over time with the updates and everything.

Ever since installing on my 64bit Windows 7 install, Firefox has continually gotten more sluggish as time moves on, hangs for 10-15 secs at a time and just gets worse over time with the updates and everything. It was fast when I first installed, but over the last six mos has slown to a crawl.

upgrade your browser to Firefox 8 and try
* getfirefox.com

RE: Capture Problems on External Drive/Audio drift over time

Greetings FCP gurus -
I posted earlier on the LAFCPUG board and now seek worldwide assistance with a problem I can't seem to resolve.
Been working in FCP since 1.5. Been successfully capturing on external FW devices for over 4 years with an old 500 MHz Powerbook - no problems.
I recently upgraded to FCP 5 Studio on a PowerBook 1.5 GHZ 512 RAM FW 4/8 machine. Prior to upgrade, I was running Panther (OS X 10.3X) and FCP 4.5 HD. This configuration allowed me to flawlessly capture to external FW drives from Panasonic AJ-D250 DVCPRO deck using a standard DVNTSC codec. Prior to that I was also able to do the same from a Sony DSR-11 deck. No longer.
I now get a constant audio "drift" every time I capture. I've tried shortening the clips to under 10 minutes - even as small as 5 minutes - but the audio progressively drifts as the clip plays on. This is true in both FCP and QT. I completely reformatted the laptop/wiped the drive prior to install (Unjournaled) and it currently has 25 gig available disk space on the 80 gig internal drive. Additionally, I'm using LaCie 7200 RPM Oxford 911 chip-set external drives. I've tried with clean D2 FW 800 and Porsche FW 400 drives to no avail - even reformatted one and still no luck.
Current configurations attempted:
FW 800 PB port to FW 800 drive port/DVCPRO deck to FW 400 PB port
FW 800 PB port to FW 800 drive port/DVCPRO deck to FW 400 drive port
FW 400 PB port to FW 400 drive port/DVCPRO deck to FW 400 drive port
..and so on.
I'm at wit's end and appreciate any insight. Is anyone else having issues capturing to External FW media via FCP 5 Studio/OSX 10.4.x? I don't currently have the option of internal drives to capture as I'm working at a client site. Additionally, I sold my FCP 4.X upgrade software so going backwards is not an option either... Even took the deck home and tried this same trick on my home machine (Dual 500 G4 Sawtooth) to the internal ATA drive with the same result -...drifting audio. Since upgrade this is my first capture and needless to say it's not going well.
Help, information and insight are greatly appreciated. Thanks

Hi Expressofiend! Were you able to resolve this issue yet? We are having an IDENTICAL problem. We shoot on a Canon XL2, and thought that might be causing the audio drifting issue? We also have a Panasonic AD-J 250 deck, and when we capture, say an interview, the lip sync is perfect for a few minutes, then drifts as much as a second or two over 20 minutes of capture. It's making us crazy. Happens when we capture to an external LaCie or our internal drive. We're using Apple's 2.7 gig duel processor computer. 2 Gig of ram, all the latest versions of Tiger, Final Cut Pro 5, etc. If we look at the Quicktime movie - it shows the audio drift - you don't even need to view it through Final Cut!
Interestingly, if we use the Canon XL2 camera as the source player when we capture the 20 minute piece - there is NO audio drift or syncing problem. Only with the AJD 250! We've spoken with the senior engineer at Panasonic - he doesn't think it's the DVCPro unit. Says drifting audio isn't the kind of thing an out of adjustment or broken deck would do.
Anyway, any answers here yet?
Thanks,
Larry

Audio prioritization over Video with webcams

Apparently FMS automatically prioritizes audio over video in
a webcam conversation. In my experience this doesn't really happen.
In my app, possibly due to bandwidth limitations, webcam stream
runs with a delay of a few seconds (starts ok, but the delay grows
as the conversation continues). When the delay happens, audio is
synced with the webcam stream. I can live with seeing a video delay
of a few seconds (or lower quality or even totally interrupted),
but I certainly don't want that to happen to the audio.
Is there something that I need to do for FMS to limit the
video stream in favour of keeping audio as close to "live" as
possible. Right now, video lags and audio is always synced with it.

I hear what Daniel is saying. FMS_Developer this is great
feedback, but can you or can anyone else in the community or at
Adobe that can help define the FMS configuration and AS elements
that need to be tweaked (read as "set") to help FMS developers
quickly get past what should be a simple set up in their app rather
than a science project or a guessing game?
(e.g. Here are the items to consider - Network (User
(Bandwidth) to Server to (Bandwidth)Users) and based on these
connections if are you trying to achieve near real time audio /
video communication there is a balance between video / audio
quality, the number of connections and the amount of dropped
packets. Here are the AS items and FMS files to tweak and why. 1)
NetStream.setBufferTime() on the Client and the Server 2)
Client.setBandwidthLimit( ), NetStream.currentFps, etc. The
NetStream.setBufferTime() is important helps you to … )
I found the same thing as Dan – I cannot find the FMS
configuration and AS elements that need to be tweaked spelled out
anywhere in a single spot towards easily understanding how to
proceed with audio / video chat apps.
Can anyone in the community or at Adobe that can help define
the FMS configuration and AS elements that need to be tweaked (read
as "set") to help FMS developers quickly get past what should be a
simple set up in their app rather than a science project or a
guessing game? Or do you know of any resource on the net that would
assist?
Thanks in advance
-SR

160N Version 1 - Wireless Range Degrading Over Time

Hello,
I have owned a version 1.0 160N now for about 5 months and all was well with everything. The range was better than any router I owned in the past until about three weeks ago when connectivity to my furthest outlying wireless adapters began to get worse. It has been slowly degrading to the point that I cannot get a reliable connection unless the computer is within 30 foot clear line of sight. Symptom is that PING to the router is not reliable and Web pages will not load even though the connection is made and maintained. I was wondering if any others have experienced this degradation in range over time. It is to the point now where I may ditch it and go get a 54G if I can find one. Will a hard reset and configuration reload possibly solve the issue. I also see that a firmware upgrade is available that is supposed to "improve wireless range" is available for the 1.0 version. Has anyone done this upgrade with ill effects or a noticiable increase in range? It is a total pain to have reconfigure all the MAC filtering and Port Forwarding but at this rate I will soon have a shiney, sleek, black doorstop. Thanks for any insight you can provide.

Yes you can Upgrade the router's firmware as it would improve your wireless range...
Download Firmware 2.89MB...
Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device: -
Open an Internet Explorer browser page.In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
Leave the username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful" After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be displayed".
Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...Release the reset button...Unplug the power cable from your router, wait for 30 seconds and re-connect the power cable...Now re-configure your router...

Dolby audio and Realtek audio drivers suddenly won't work on windows 8.

I've got an Ideapad U510, Windows 8 64-bit system.
A couple of days ago I got a message, which stated that the dolby audio driver didn't work, and I needed to reinstall the driver or restart. I did both and neither worked.
I searched for drivers on Lenovos website, and updated the driver for Realtek audio. Now the logo for sound just have a red X on it and I don't know what to do. I uninstalled the drivers, installed them again and it didn't work so I uninstalled it again.
The dolby digital driver won't install again, it says it needs PCEE to install but I have no idea what to do.
Please help me. I don't know what caused the problem, so I have no idea how to get my audio working again.

hi Bubble,
Welcome to the Lenovo Forums.
Can you try the following:
1. Press the Windows key‌ +R, type appwiz.cpl and press Enter. On the list of programs, remove any instances of Dolby or Realtek Audio and reboot.
2. After the reboot, press the Windows key‌ +R, type devmgmt.msc and press Enter. On the Device Manager, expand Sound, video, and game controllers and check if the sound device is listed as High Definition Audio. If it says Realtek High Definition Audio, uninstall it, put a check on 'delete device driver software' and reboot. This step will install a generic sound driver that should enable you to play sound on the unit.
If the above steps doesn't work and you still see the red X mark on the sound adapter then you may need to backup important data and do one of the following:
a. System Restore
b. System Recovery via the OneKey Recovery Button
c. Refresh or Reset Windows 8
Regards
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

Audio distortion over time

The audio I am receiving deteriorates to a "fuzz" and eventually disappears completely after a few minutes of using Facetime on my mac mini with an isight camera for sound and video. Using lion and facetime 1.1.1. After I end the call, restart the app and call again, the sound is fine for a few minutes and then it starts all over again. Suggestions?

That's extremely strange. Although nothing's impossible, I think iTunes is the least likely culprit. Normally, if files are getting corrupted, the number 1 suspect is a failing disk drive. You might want to run some diagnostics on your disk.
How was the file ripped? Is it Mp3 or AAC? Some old rippers did non-standard things, and maybe new players are a little fussier. I thought all that had been sorted out by 2008, though.
You said you have Time Machine backups. Do you have any of when it was good?
I'd suggest trying to open it with Audacity and see if there's anything "interesting" about it.
If it's an MP3, you could also try an MP3 repair utility, like this one:
http://mp3.about.com/od/tutorials/ht/Repair-MP3-Files.htm
(I have no direct experience with this program).

Please help me figure out why this thread's performance degrades over time

Hello.
The code below is from a Runnable that I've tested inside a Thread operating on a TreePath array of size 1500; the array 'clonedArrayB' is this TreePath array. The code is designed to create a more stepped version of setSelectionPaths(TreePath[]) from class JTree.
The performance decrease of the thread is very rapid; this is discernible simply from viewing the println speed. When it gets to about 1400 TreePaths added to the JTree selection, it's running at roughly 1/10 the speed it started running at.
I know there's no problem with maintaining a set of selected paths of that size inside a JTree. I also know that the thread stops when it should. So it must be some operation I'm performing inside the brief piece of code shown below that is causing the performance degradation.
Does anyone have any idea what could be causing the slowdown?
Many thanks for your help. Apologies if you would have liked an SSCCE, but I very much doubt it's necessary for this. Either you can see the problem or you can't. And sadly I can't x:'o(
int indexA = 0;
public void run() {
     // Prevent use of / Pause scanner
     try {
          scannerLock.acquire();
     } catch (InterruptedException exc) {
          Gecko.logException("Scanner lock could not be acquired by expansion thread", exc);
     while (!autoExpansionComplete) {
          while (indexA < clonedArrayA.length) {
               int markerA = indexA + 10;
               for (int a = indexA; a < markerA && a < clonedArrayA.length; a++) {
                    pluginTreeA.addSelectionPath(clonedArrayA[a]);
               indexA = markerA;
               System.out.println(indexA + "," + clonedArrayA.length);
                    if (autoExpansionComplete) {
                         break;
               stop();
};

Well, since I've had no responses, I tried to think of other ways to speed the code up.
I'd already made nearly every tweak I know. The only additional thing I could think of was to use addSelectionPaths(TreePath[]) on a subarray of the cloned array, instead of addSelectionPath(TreePath) on the cloned array's elements, since obviously it would be fewer method calls. It has sped things up an awful lot (my new code is shown below - I've left in some things I chopped out above, so you can see exactly what I see). The problem is though, obviously an increase in initial velocity doesn't solve the problem of deceleration occurring, if you get me.
// Clone the selection arrays to non-volatile arrays for better access
// speeds
final TreePath[] clonedArrayA = selectionPathsArrayA.clone();
final TreePath[] clonedArrayB = selectionPathsArrayB.clone();
// Create a new runnable to perform the selection task
Runnable selectionExpander = new Runnable() {
     /** Position within cloned array A */
     int indexA = 0;
     /** Position within cloned array B */
     int indexB = 0;
     /** Length of subarray grabbed from cloned array A */
     int lengthA;
     /** Length of subarray grabbed from cloned array B */
     int lengthB;
     /** Subarray destination */
     private TreePath[] subarray = new TreePath[100];
     public void stop() {
          autoExpansionComplete = true;
          automatedSelection = false;
          scannerLock.release();
      * Grabs 10 blocks of each selection paths array at a time, adding
      * these to the tree's current selection and then moving to the next
      * cycle
     public void run() {
          // Prevent use of / Pause scanner
          try {
               scannerLock.acquire();
          } catch (InterruptedException exc) {
               Gecko.logException("Scanner lock could not be acquired by expansion thread", exc);
          while (!autoExpansionComplete) {
               while (indexA < clonedArrayA.length || indexB < clonedArrayB.length) {
                    // Set subarray lengths
                    lengthA = subarray.length;
                    lengthB = subarray.length;
                    // If subarray length is greater than the number of
                    // remaining indices in the source array, set length to
                    // the number of remaining indices
                    lengthA = indexA + lengthA > clonedArrayA.length ? clonedArrayA.length - indexA : lengthA;
                    lengthB = indexB + lengthB > clonedArrayB.length ? clonedArrayB.length - indexB : lengthB;
                    // Create subarrays and add TreePath elements to trees'
                    // selections
                    System.arraycopy(clonedArrayA, indexA, subarray, 0, lengthA);
                    pluginTreeA.addSelectionPaths(subarray);
                    System.arraycopy(clonedArrayB, indexB, subarray, 0, lengthB);
                    pluginTreeB.addSelectionPaths(subarray);
                    // Remember the latest index reached in source arrays
                    indexA += lengthA;
                    indexB += lengthB;
                    System.out.println(indexA + "," + clonedArrayA.length);
                    System.out.println(indexB + "," + clonedArrayB.length);
                    if (autoExpansionComplete) {
                         break;
               stop();
// Create and start new thread to manage the selection task runner
selector = new Thread(selectionExpander);
selector.start();I really can't think what could be causing the slowdown. I've done everythng I can think of to increase the velocity, such as cloning the source arrays since they're volatile and access could be slightly slower as a result.
Nothing I try gets rid of the slowdown effect though :(
- Dave

Recording Video and Audio at Same time with simultaneous sync

I want to record a keyboard performance into garageband and at the same time record the playing of that performance with my video camera. Then I want to create a movie using the music from garageband and the video from the camera. I was thinking that if I can sync the video and audio when I'm recording the session, then that part is taken care of. Or, maybe this is easier than I think it is?
Is there a way to do this so that I can use the garageband record performance and have it synced to the video on the camera?
I don't want to use the audio from the video camera because the performance that is captured in Garageband will be much better and I can do editing of the individual notes in GB.
In the end, I just want to make a movie and/or podcast of the performance.
I'm a newbie regarding this, but I did search the forums and couldn't find anything specific. Mostly it was about importing video into GB3 and then syncing new audio. I'll basically have audio and video from the same performance in two separate locations and I want to bring them together perfectly in Garageband.
Thanks for any help you can provide.
Powerbook G4 - DVI Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Okay. I got the video and audio all together. I told you I'd link to it when it was up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FxssYpUNJm8
There's also a copy of it at http://www.myspace.com/bonjimmy/
And as a quick side comment, even though I uploaded the same video to both YouTube and MySpace, the MySpace version is much better. YouTube must do something to the video after it's uploaded.
What I learned doing this project:
I recorded the video first (which gave me the sequencing of the piano performance) and then I dubbed the audio in later. However, there wasn't a good way to sync the video and the prerecorded piano, so there are some spots where the dubbed audio vocal isn't accurate to the video. I'm not sure what the pros do for this. I was hoping I'd remember how I sang for the video but when a couple weeks go by before re-doing the audio, it's about impossible. I tried, though.
I remember working with an old 4-track and smpte to a sequencer a long time ago. With the way it is now, it's pretty cool that you can record digitally and mix and match and everything falls together perfectly as long as you have a place to match the video and the audio. It's pretty cool.
What else???
Does anyone have suggestions that would have made it better? Also, if you have suggestions on my performance or whatever, I'd love comments, but you can do that on the linked page.
Thanks again for all your help. (The point of the video is because I'm thinking about getting back out there and doing some more playing... I'm looking for a band or something else interesting...)
Powerbook G4 - DVI Mac OS X (10.4.10)

Audio Popping over HDMI with R9 285 Gaming

Definitely pulling my hair out trying to solve this!
I have an MSI R9 285 plugged into a ASrock X99 Extreme4 mobo and running CCC Beta drivers and Win7 64bit. I've got an Onkyo 5.1 AV receiver which the HDMI out of the card is plugged into. Whenever I play music or watch something I hear popping on the audio. This doesn't happen when I use the onboard soundcard of the mobo when listening via headphones. I have tried a different HDMI cable, tried re-installing the graphics and the bundled audio drivers, tried not allowing applications exclusive priority of the AMD High def audio device, tried different bitrates etc and every time I still get that faint popping. The card is running at stock speed with no kind of overclock. Any idea what the problem might be? The card is only a few months old. Many thanks for any help!

When you say popping is it a constant popping while it's playing? Or just when you first start playing something?
What is displayed on you AV Receiver? What model is it?

Sensor Mapping Express VI's performance degrades over time

I was attempting to do a 3d visualization of some sensor data. I made a model and managed to use it with the 3d Picture Tool Sensor Mapping Express VI. Initially, it appeared to work flawlessly and I began to augment the scene with further objects to enhance the user experience. Unfortunately, I believe I am doing something wrong at this stage. When I add the sensor map object to the other objects, something like a memory leak occurs. I begin to encounter performance degradation almost immediately.
I am not sure how I should add to best add in the Sensor Map Object reference to the scene as an object. Normally, I establish these child relationships first, before doing anything to the objects, beyond creating, moving, and anchoring them. Since the Sensor Map output reference is only available AFTER the express vi run. My compromise solution, presently, is to have a case statement of controlled by the"First Call" constant. So far, performace seems to be much better.
Does anyone have a better solution? Am I even handling these objects the way the community does it?
EDIT: Included the vi and the stl files.
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:12 PM
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:12 PM
Message Edited by Sean-user on 10-28-2009 04:16 PM
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
test for forum.vi ‏105 KB
chamber.zip ‏97 KB

I agree with Hunter, your current solution is simple and effective, and I can't really visualize a much better way to accomplish the same task.
Just as a side-note, the easiest and simplest way to force execution order is to use the error terminals on the functions and VIs in your block diagram. Here'a VI snippet with an example of that based on the VI you posted. (If you paste the image into your block diagram, you can make edits to the code)
Since you expressed some interest in documentation related to 3D picture controls, I did some searching and found a few articles you might be interested in. There's nothing terribly complex, but these should be a good starting point. The first link is a URL to the search thread, so you can get an idea of where/what I'm searching.You'll get more hits if you search from ni.com rather than ni.com/support.
http://search.ni.com/nisearch/app/main/p/q/3d%20picture/
Creating a 3D Scene with the 3D Picture Control
Configuring a 3D Scene Window
Using the 3D Picture Control 'Create Height Field VI' to convert a 2D image into a 3D textured heigh...
Using Lighting and Fog Effects in 3d Picture Control
3D Picture Control - Create a Moving Texture Using a Series of Images
Changing Set Rotation and Background of 3D Picture Control
Caleb Harris
National Instruments | Mechanical Engineer | http://www.ni.com/support

Audio is not in sync with the video. how do I make audio run in time with video?

when I play any video from any site, the video lags behind the audio. How do I correct this?

While the posted solution to my sync issue could very well correct my problem, the poster presumes I am computer literate, which I am not. lol
could the solution provider please explain the solution as is it were being given to a 6 year old? Although most 6 year old's are possibly more computer literate than I. lol
Thank you for your time.
I will be checking back for any response.

Tweening a MC over Time with ActionScript

This is probably very basic and simple scripting but I need
help. I am looking to tween a Movie Clip (img1) from 0 to 100% alph
over a time spand of 5 seconds. I have the instance name of that
particular Movie Clip img1_mc. I want to have this function/script
applied to other alike Movie Clips. Question is:
A) What is a simple actionscript to do this?
B) How do I have it perform that action script when it enters
the frame
Any help would be great. I have looked online but am limited
on time. Most information is close but is missing or has more than
enough other information that it makes it somewhat confuseing.
Thanks in advance!
Luke

dont cross post..
Link
to same post in General

REALTEK AUDIO DEGRADING OVER TIME WITH FLME - PC WINDOWS 7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for