Rebate settlement not posting

Hi,
I encounter the following problem with B3 and B1 billing types: Error in account determination message VF051 for Partial settlement and Final settlement
A bit more detail:
Create a rebate agreement with relevant conditions.
Complete Customer Order Cycle Process with Billing.
Accrual posted successfully.
However when you display the open items in this Provision GL account, items are shown when you select Normal items. When Noted items is selected, nothing is displayed.
I have create a rebate settlement credit memo request limited to amount in accrual account. It saved successfully, remove the billing block and created the Credit Memo that don't want to release to accounting.
The same rebate conditions are displayed in document in 2 lines: one with a positive and one with a negative. The positive in the Net Value amount. When you check account determination analysis on the credit memo then it determines the accrual account and the rebate sales deduction account.
It is possible that the accrual posted as a normal item could prevent the system from reversing the accrual in the provision account and we should therefore change it to post as a noted item.

Hi,
Try the transaction code KE4I, to assign SD condition type to COPA.
Thanks,
Rudi

Similar Messages

Rebate accruals not posted for returns

Hai Guys,
I have created a rebate and the accruals postings are happening fine.
When I am making the returns, the system is not reducing the accruals. I checked the 'Condition Type' for Provision for Correction - it is left blank so that automatic correction takes place.
I can't figure out where the things are going wrong. Can somebody help me in this regards.
Regards,
Maheshwaran. I

Dear krishna
i tried your scenario--so after changing the validity for my Material rebate agreement type--i ran VBOF(SDBONT06)--so system has shown the updated billing doc with rebate which was not having any rebate condition earlier.
Have you tried by retrieving all the billing docs created after service render date of 28th Feb14.
Please take all the billing docs created after this date from VBRK table and you check some random billings docs whether rebate condition type is active with condition record or not.
(other wise you try with by executing condition record numbers in KONV(doc condition number--then followed by VBRK)
pl update us..
Phanikumar

Rebate settlements should not hit the VAT account

Hello everyone,
There is a question on Rebate Settlement.
There is a customer who is entitled to a 15% BPR rebate.
We are accruing for this rebate successfully
The issue we are having is that the materials that this customer buy from us attract 20% VAT but when the customer claims back from us they do not claim the VAT component.
We need to be able to do rebate settlements that do not hit the VAT account.
I ran a test in SAP on a sample rebate agreement but the only way I could get the rebate settlement to not hit a VAT account was to change a material to be not liable for tax and then settle against that material.
Billing doc 1-Posts to VAT since the material is Tax inclusive
Billing doc 2-Does not posts to VAT since the material is Tax exclusive
Any of you aware of any other way to do this (perhaps using a payment type)??
Kindly suggest,
Regards
Manjunath

Hi Manjunath,
As Brian already explained the way how usually rebate settlements happen with settlement or dummy material.
Is our business needs to have settlement against actual materials billed ?
If yes, we did an approach in our client.
we have a six document concept which is custom developed.
You have 2 documents created for rebate settlement run. Rebate credit memo request and rebate credit memo for settlement or dummy material maintained in rebate agreement.
These two documents gets cancelled with corresponding cancellation documents.
New set of documents created for Rebate credit memo request and rebate credit memo with actual materials.
All of these documents are created using a batchjob and these documents form document flow in our case.
You can try with help of an ABAPer for achieving this.
Thanks
Rama

Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

Dear Expert,
I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
Please advice.
Thank you.
KH

Hi Kiran,
The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Extenede Rebate Settlement: Item not relevant for billing

Hi Friends,
While processing the Extended Rebate Settlement, either Partial Settlement or Final Settlement, I'm getting the message "Item is not Relevant for Billing"
Can anyone help me resolve this.
Regards,
Srikar

Dear Srikar,
While doing the rebate settlement in the settlement documents settlement material (which is assigned in the Rebate agreement) will be used to settle the amount.So you check the item category settings of that sattlement material through VOV7 transaction.
Go to VOV7 transaction then select your settlement material itemcategory then go in to the detail screen here you check the settings for the field Billing Relevance maintain this field as B then try.
I hope this will help you,
Regards,
Murali.

Settled but not posted

Is there any T-code or standard report which can find the list of transaction which are settled, but not posted?
I tried TPM20, but only those were posted is listed

please check if you selected only relevant area (-s) for you, e.g. if you need a list of contracts settled but not posted, then mark 'issue no messages' in all non-relevant areas, like in a screenshot attached.
/Renatas

Parallel depreciation area not posted when trying to settle an order.

Hi,
We have requirement of using parallel currencies in one of the cocode.So I havee set up parallel currencies in AA as well.
We have three currencies EUR as Local currency, USD as Group Currency and CHF as Index-based Curremcy.
I have set up Depreciation areas
01 Book depreciation areau2014posts in real timeu2014leading ledger 0L
02 Book depreciation area for CHFu2014posts Dep only u2013Z1 european ledger
10u2014Statutory Depreciation areau2014Do not post
19u2014Derived Dep area (01-10)
29u2014Dervied dep area (02-01) Posts APC onlyu2014Z1 european leading ledger
30-Consolidated Balancesheet in local currencyu2014do not post
31u2014consolidated balance sheet in group currencyu2014do not post
32u2014Book dep in Group currency u2013do not post--assigned USD in OABT
42-Book dep in Group currency-do not post --assigned CHF in OABT
I have selected Indentical and TTr check box for dep areas 02,31,32, & 42.
I have done the consistency check and it shows no errors in depreciation area set up.
When Trying to settle an internal order in KO88 to a fixed asset I am getting the below error message.
*Data inconsistency: Parallel depr. area is not posted Message no. AAPO104*
Diagnosis
For chart of depreciation ZCH, you defined this area (or these areas) as parallel depreciation areas for depreciation area 01. In the current transaction, however, not all of these areas are posted. This is not allowed.
Procedure
Check if the transaction type is limited to certain depreciation areas. If there is such a limitation, add the missing depreciation areas for the transaction type.
Check if the asset that is being posted manages all these depreciation areas.
I have checked the transaction types and they are not limited to any depreciation areas. I have activated depreciatio areas in the asset class and maintained the account determination nad assigned g/l accounts.
Please help me if I have missed any settings.
Thanks & Regards
Nirmala

Hi,
AAPO104 is generally a customizing error: the check points to consider are generally the following regarding parallel currencies: I think you have checked most of them already...
* The parall. dep. area must have the same settings as the original area (e.g. allowing APC).
* The parall. dep. area must set for identical values take over.
* The parall. dep. area must set for identical parameter take over.
* The parall. dep. area must be assigned to the currency type which is defined as parallel in FI in trx. OB22 (e.g. 30).
* The parall. dep. area must be activated in the asset class (transaction OAYZ)
Furthermore, a problem can also be that in OABT you have a parallel area customized, taking value from another area, which is customized and seen in T093. If for example this parall.area is missing on your Asset Under Construction but is there on the final asset this obviously will create the error AAPO104, too.
In any case check your settings are correct in regards to parallel depreciation areas. They must manage same values as original areas. If they don't it cannot be a parallel area.
Maybe you also need to consider the information in SAP note 317806.
Also, looking at your different depreciation areas above, it looks that you have set up a ledger scenario (areas 01 , 02 and 29). I wonder, do you have a correct set up for the parallel currency for your ledger scenario? If I am not mistaken, I don't see a derived parallel currency area. Could this be the problem?
Regards,
Brigitte

How the sales returns will effect after rebate settlement in sap

Dear SD Experts,
I have a query that the Rebate settlement is done (Material Rebate) after that the sales returns has taken place and again in the credit memo the system is showing the rebate accruals.
Can any one please suggest me how the actual postings will takes place? what changes need to be done to reverse the rebate accrual already posted.
Thanks in advance.
Anjan kumar

Hi Imran
1. The first entry should ideally happen along with the invoice posting or when you run VBOF.
Dr. Rebate Discount
Cr. Rebate Accrual
This means that rebate accruals are happening. This means you are keeping a provision to pay. You are booking a liability in your books.
2. The second entry is when you pay out to the customer.
Dr. Rebate Accrual
Cr. Customer
This means you are reducing the customer balance by adjusting against the liability. Ideally this entry is passed when you do a partial settlement. If a final settlement is executed then the additional accruals if any in the account will get reversed.
3. While taking returns the entry that you say that is happening is
Dr. Customer
Cr. Rebate Accrual
This is also correct since he has returned the good, we ideally should not pass on the benefit to him. Additionally if this is happening that means the rebate is still active. When you finally settle the rebate if there is any balance in the rebate account it will get reversed. This means liability will be reversed in your books of accounts.
Thanks
Indranil

Profit centre error while vendor rebate settlement

Hi
this is regarding vendor rebate settlement TC- MEB4.
while settlement of agreement, system is not able to determine the profit centre, hence unable to post the entries. in this regards, i have checked following:-
1. material used in rebate agreement - profit centre maintained
2. field status of all GL used in settlement process is optional for profit centre and cost centre
3. in document splitting, categories of the GL's are Balance Sheet Item and Revenue
4. field status of the posting key also open for profit centre
5. document type is defined as Unspecified posting in splitting
do i need to look some other place for possible cause of error? please revert
Regards
DD

If you have mainatained the Rebate as accrual based on agreement adn Sales conditions then you should use Item Category as "01300-Cash Discount Clearing".
Change and try in atest system and while changing the category read the warning message carefully that the system issues and understand the implications.

Rebate settlement and VAT

Hi Gurus,
I am implementing retrospective rebates in SD.
I have produced a rebate settlement document (in Poland (where I am working) that document is a corrective invoice request). With the billing document that I will produce from that request I need to post VAT in addition to the usual postings that SAP performs in rebate agreement settlements (that is: accruals reverse, client account profit correction and posting of rebate ammount).
That means that I need somehow to include MWST like price conditions in the settlement documents.
Unfortunatelly it seems that SAP does not allow including any new conditions in the pricing of those settlement documents. No new conditions can be added to the corrective invoice request.
Is there any way to add price conditions to a rebate settlement document ?
Or is it a SAP constraint that nothing else can be changed there in order to not to mess with the normal rebate settlement ?
I have a program that calculates the right VAT ammounts I have to post. If only I could include it somehow in the settlement doc. that would solve the problem...
Thank you in advance for any advice

Hello,
Can you tell which Rebate Type are you using and which Sales Document type this rebate type generates?
Thanks
Fátima

Free goods in lieu of Rebate Credit Note

Hi Gurus,
Can we have the option of Free Goods Settlement instead of Rebate Credit Note at the time of Rebate Settlement.
Your reply is highly appreciated.
Sadanandam Kasarla

Hi Sadanandam kasarla
Generally if you want to issue free goods then you need to create a sales order and you have to deliver the stock from the storage location also. The inventory level will come down
But if you are doing the rebate settlement. then you will be using a Dummy material to create the sales order and then you will be doing billing . Finally only the rebate value will be settled to the customer .
Regards
Srinath

Getting an unusual error while running transaction for rebate settlement

Hi Experts ,
While i am running a customized transaction for vb7 that is rebate settlement , I have input field on agreement screen of payment method . Whenever , i put any value in that field and run the transaction , it gives me an error " Input values must be defined in Table T042Z. The value or
values ' T ' are not specified in this table. " whereas when i check the table T042Z for payment method values , the values i m entering are present there . I cannot get why its showing this error .
Could anyone plz help as its very urgent req ..
Thanks in advance ..
Ankit

Ankit,
Set a breakpoint very early in the program's soruce code. When you hit that breakpoint in the debugger, go to the menu bar and choose Breakpoints > Breakpoint at > Statement . Enter the word MESSAGE into that pop-up window and continue the program's execution.
This will stop the debugger at all MESSAGE statements... Including the one that is generating your error. You can then analyze the code just prior to that error.... and address the issue accordingly.

Derivation of pricing procedure in rebate credit note

Hi friends!
We have unique issue related to settlement of rebate credit note for a rebate agreement document. The rebate condition records are not populating with correct condition types and there is different pricing procedure being derived in credit note document. My query is that where do we maintain pricing procedure for rebate credit note (VF03) and how do the pricing procedure determine for rebate credit note.
Thanks & regards,
Praveen.

Dear Praveen
In rebates once you settle the amount from rebate agreement the credit memo request will be generated automatically.
With reference to the credit memo request number you go to the VF01 and raise the credit memo (g2).
Make sure that document pricing procedure should be same for credit memo req and credit memo and respective pricing procedure should be assigned in u201COVKKu201D .
Please try and let me know the status
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

Rebate settlement at Sales order level

Insight requested..
How to do rebate settlement at sales order level, generally rebate settlement is done after the invoice creation and with reference to accounting document.

Dear sud
The definition for rebate is A rebate is a special discount which is paid retroactively to a customer. This discount is based on the customer's sales volume over a specified time period.
Having said that if you are willing to give some discount to your customer, on the order itself, we can call it as DISCOUNT and it should not be called as REBATES.
For discounts, you can create a condition type and assign it to your pricing procedure.
Incidentally, can you please let me know what warrants you to ask this question. I am sure, the sales process won't be like that.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Account Determination Error for Rebate Settlements

I have question on Account Determination for rebates
Here are the entries that I have made in VKOA
ERB - R201051
ERU - R201051 / R120201
ERS - R120201
ERL - R559001
I am able to accrue the money to right accounts, but I am getting an Account Determination error when processing rebate settlements
Any input on this would be really helpful.
Thank you!

Hi Shailesh
When you are getting the error in rebate settlements it means you carefully check
all the combinations for VKOA settings. Whether the Account assignment
group in all the Materials used in settlement document along with the customer account assignment group
is maintained or not. Also check in the pricing procedure the account key used.
For all these account key the settings are made in VKOA or not. Hope it will help you
Thanks
sushant

Rebate settlement not posting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for