Rebates : partial settlement and finall settlement in same order type

Hello,
I have to activate manual payment procedure for rebates
But when I put the order type which is the same than the one specified in the final settlement, i got a message VK340 telling me this document type is not allowed for partial rebates.
I've compared this order type to another one permitted by the systele, i can see no difference.
In both cases we are speaking about credit note so it could be possible ?
Thank for your help,

Hi
ya of course , Generally we use Order type R4 for Partial settlement amd R3 for Final settlement.Eventually Credit note and final bills r generated consequently.
So,error is right,
Plz Go to T.Coed Agreement type VB(2 and brush up the concept.
Thanks
mk
Note U can even make partial payment Via VBO2.Which give u credit note against that.

Similar Messages

SAP HR INDIAN PAYROLL- FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT GUIDE

Hi,
We are implementing SAP HR for Indian Payroll and now trying to configure Full and Final Settlement . We have not integrated our system with FI yet completely. Can anybody please provide me with some link or documentation guide so that i can set up FnF in the system. Although there is data available on google and some of the forums but its not complete .
Please help.
Regards
Neha

Hi,
I want to put another question to forum members linked to the above query only. As of now we separate the employee in PA40 personnel actions t-code, now if we use termination workbench, then Pa30 IT0000 does not get updated for the Separation action. In this case do we need to first run the Separation action in PA40 and then through Termination workbench also?
Please help ASAP.
Regards
Neha

Query for the FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT REPORT

Hi, any one has the query for the FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT REPORT in oracle hrms??

Hi,
I go through that .class file and find that they have used below package in that.
PAY_IN_TERM_RPRT_GEN_PKG
Hope this will help you.

Percentage rate settlement and amount settlement

What is the difference between percentage rate settlement and amount settlement and how does this impact settling orders?

Order cost will be settled to some settlement receivers.
1. If you maintain Percentage, based on the percentage entry, cost will be distributed among different receivers.
2. If you maintain Amount, directly amount can be entered & will be settled.
For example, order cost is 1000 & settlement receivers are 4 different cost centers. We have cost center as CC1, CC2, CC3 & CC4.
Settlement % for each cost center as follows:
CC1 -> 20%
CC2 -> 10%
CC3 -> 35%
CC4 -> 35%
Then cost will be calculated accordingly, settlement will happen.
Also you can enter amount against each cost center.

How to put material and service in the same order

I want to put the material and service in the same order. How do it input different taxes. and also migo for one material item and other service item.

HI,
In your scenario create material and service PO using T-code ME21N as follows.
1) Select PO document type, vendor and PO date
2) PO first line item account assignment 'N' if project and give input data material code,plant,storage location,qty,rate,delivery date and tax code.
3) PO second line item account assignment 'K', item category 'D',material short text for service, plant,storage location,material group data's are input given and press enter it will open 'Service Tab' in Item Detail Menu.
4) In item Detail Menu - Service tab you will give Service no.,qty,gross price for the above service material activity and service tax code in Invoice TAB and then check PO and SAVE.
5) After getting PO approved by top management.
6) PO first line item, you will do MIGO and PO second line item you will do ML81N service entry sheet.
7) On the vendor bill, you will mention material document number (GRN no.) & Service sheet number and given to accounts dept.. They will book vendor bill and give payment.
Hope, it is useful for you and solve your requirement.
Regards,
K.Rajendran

Is there any constrain in using the same order type for MTS and MTO

Hi,
i have the constrain to use single production order type .
Can i use single order type for MTO and MTS.
is there any constrain in using the same order type for MTS and MTO.
pls help me.

Hi,
There is no constraint or limitation in using the same production order type for MTS and MTO . Settings in requirement class and material master will mainly control whether the flow is MTS or MTO.
Regards,
Mrinal

Different number ranges for same order type

Hi PP Guru's ,
Can anyone send me the user exit for the differnet number range creation for the same order type.
Same order type is used in two different Plants. So our client want to track the production order plantwise.
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Nagraj

Hi Nagaraj,
The number range is defined at order type level ( i.e. client level)
So if you want to use different number range for different plant, then use different order type for different plants.
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Different Production order number ranges with same order type

Dear Friends,
I am working on live project implementation.I am having four manufacturing plants.I am having one order type say PPLE, I am having two different versions say CM and CN.Now my requirement is can I maintain two different number ranges for same order types within single plant .
number ranges should be like,
Plant          Version     Number ranges
1210            CM           CM121008...
1210            CN            CN121008
1220            CM           CM121008
1220             CN           CN121008
and so on.here first two digit should be version,then plant and year followed by order number .
Regards,
Manoj Jadhav

Hi manoj,
You cant have two different number ranges for an order type in internal number range, but in external number range you can have two diffrent number ranges
for example for one order you can start with CM1210080001 and other starting from CN1210080001.
Just convince the client to have external number range
Regards,
Srini

Issue regarding : ESI - Full and final Settlement

Hi,
Regarding ESI :
While doing Final settlement for the employee; ESI is calculating on overall Gross..Actually, it has to take on Actual Gross Earned. for that month i.e. for 15 days and Esi should be calculated on that 15 days only.
Any inputs on the above issue is highly appreciated
Regards
Tinkoo.

Hi Tinkoo,
The ESI is calculated on half yearly basis. From Apr to Sep and Oct to Mar. Assume that if an employee is drawing payment Rs 9500/- in the month of Apr 2010 and his salary is increased by Rs 1000/- in the month of May and his gross will become Rs 10500/- which is more than the ESI limit i.e. Rs 10000/- In this case ESI contribution for this employee will be continued to deduct up to Sep 2010 and the same will be discontinued from 2010 automatically.
In your case it seems the ESI is getting deducted for the period left i.e. first 6 months period.
Regards
Mohan
Edited by: Mohan Reddy on May 24, 2010 12:56 PM
ESI limit has been changed from 10000 to 15000 Please have a note of it rest mohan has updated

How to pass the entry via HR to FI when the recovery is made in cash from employee for full and final settlement

Hello Team,
Here is a scenario am stuck with-->
Employee has been terminated effective 28th April 2014 after the payroll run.
We are deducting (28-30th) 3 days salary( say 500 USD)
He is getting sm amount say USD1000 as business trip allowance
After the Full and final calculation he is to pay to the company USD 400 which the employee has paid in cash.
How should be pass this entry to finance from HR?
Thanks,
Poonam

Hi Poonam, If Employee has paid cash. Here are your option. 1. Send that money treasury department 2. Do you have any deduction wage type? Use that in infotype 0014 and re-run offcyle for him when was active. 3. Perform GL account posting. 4. FI Business will get this as a deduction in balance sheet account but they will adjust this from the cash money account which got from that employee. Regards, Arpit

Whether E5620 and E5-2650 are same "CPU type" from replication point view?

Our product supply both HP X86 G7 and X86 G8. G7 use E5620 and G8 use E5-2620. We have two servers installed with Timesten instance. One timesten instance is active and another one is standby. There is DB replication between two DB instance.
This kind of configuration requires that the two servers have same "CPU type" based on following:
"The master and subscriber databases must reside on machines that have the same
operating system, CPU type, and word size. Although you can replicate between
databases that reside on the same machine, replication is generally used for copying
updates into a database that resides on another machine. This helps prevent data loss
from node failure."
Then, whether the E5620 and E5-2650 are the same "CPU type" from timesten point view ? Can we establish DB replication between two severs with E5620 and E5-2650 ?

Yes, these are considered the 'same' they are both Intel Xeon CPUs. The key things are CPU architecture and endianness.
Chris

Different number range for different sales area but same order type

i have 2 different sales area but i have assigned same sales order type for 2 different sales area,
but i need the number range different for different sales area for that same sales doc type,
is that there is any user exists for number range? if so how can i find the user exists

Hi,
You can surely have a different number range per Sales Area. For this you will have to make use of a User Exit (which would surpass the standard SAP functionality). Try USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE.
Maintain the desired range in VN01 with the respective Range Keys.
Make a custom table comprising of Sales Area and Number Range keys (same keys which you maintained in VN01).
Now everytime, the system will check which sales area is used and accordingly, it will fetch the Number Range Key~Sales Area combination from the custom table, and will pick up the number range from VN01.
Coding should done by a good technical guy to make this work nicely.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,
Vivek

Question on Search Help and Authorization Check for Sales Order Type

Question 1:
When I go to VA01 and click the search help, it shows only order type that are not blocked.
However, when I have sales order type in select-options of a Z program,
S_AUART FOR VBAK-AUART
I click on the search help, it gives all the sales order types. How can I have a list with unblocked sales order type only?
Question 2:
I want to check whether a use can extract data from a sales order type (e.g. OR and RE)that he/she authorized to use.
I have include the following in my program:
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'AUART'
ID 'AUART' FIELD 'OR'.
It always returns SY-SUBRC = 12.
But order type 'OR' is granted to the user (he/she can create order with type OR in VA01)
Please kindly give me some ideas, thanks.

hi,
ad1
use following code:
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR auart.
PERFORM auartGet.
FORM auartGet.
    CALL FUNCTION 'RV_HELP'
         EXPORTING
              KEY            = VKORG
              KEY2           = VTWEG
              KEY3           = SPART
              KEY4           = '0'
              NUMBER         = '008'
              FIELD_IN       = AUART
         IMPORTING
              FIELD          = AUART.
ENDFORM.
ad2.
example:
   AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'V_VBAK_AAT'
         ID 'AUART' FIELD 'OR'
         ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01'. "01-create order, 02-change, 03 display
check sy-subrc eq 0.
regards,darek

Acting as router and partner with the same message type

Hi All
Let A and B be two companies communicating with each other
via a company called R. Some MSCONS messages will just be
routed, some MSCONS messages will be kept by R, processed
and then routed on. The only way to know if it should be
processed or not is to read some of its fields and compare
them with current state in the database owned by company
R. If company A sends a MSCONS to B via R, the sending and
receiving identification id in the message will belong to
A and B, not R.
To make it more complicated, there are about 200 companies
communicating via R in the same way as A and B. Further
more, MSCONS is only one out of about 15 types of message
routed under these conditions.
Any suggestions on how to apply B2B to this use case is
most appreciated.
Best regards
Pär

Hi
I have a hard time to get following use case to work.
If company A sends an MSCONS to company B and C via R, is there a
way to configure B2B in R so that only one agreement is needed even though
company B and C have different interchange id's?After sending a MSCONS from A to R (host) and I look in reports, I find
that the sender, receiver, exchange protocol, document protocol, and business
action has been identified, but state is set to error. When looking into the log
I find following.
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Enter
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeReceiverQual, val = [ZZ]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [ZZ]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeSenderID, val = [27700]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [Emix]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Value and doc parameter don't match
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeReceiverID, val = [10001]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [null]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup Value doesn't match, doc parameter is null
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = Standard, val = [EDIFACT]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [EDIFACT]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeControlVersion, val = [2]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [2]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = ec_DataNodeName, val = [Interchange]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup key = InterchangeSenderQual, val = [ZZ]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup param = [ZZ]
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = false
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doLookup return = false
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Param Name = TPName
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:getValue Value = Actor
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Enter
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit getLookUpError Key = key = [InterchangeSenderID] value = [27700] param = [Emix] Value = null
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit getLookUpError Key = key = [InterchangeReceiverID] value = [10001] param = [null] Value = null
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit NodeGUID = {7DDD0E19-7D9E-40AC-8DAC-A10BDB9AFB9E} position = 0
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:516: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.document.edi.ISelectorImpl:doCommit Leave
2007.09.25 at 17:32:47:526: Thread-20: B2B - (DEBUG) iAudit report :
I do not want to add interchange sender id's 10001 and 27700 to
Document Protocol Parameters because then I make the document
protocol partner sensitive.
Any help is most welcome.
Best regards
Pär

Final settlement of Rebates

Dear Members
When i record a rebate agreement in SAP 4.6C, then after the sales process-delivery , billing and account determination i am able to do both Partial (manual ) and Final settlements.
But in 4.7, for final settlement system shows the message" Sales volumes are not Current" and suggest that i need to use OSS note for correcting this. Do i have to activate any info-structure
Please suggest me right solution
Thanks in advance
Regards
Narasimha

Hi,
Usually this message would come if rebate agreement is created retroactively.That means that a rebate agreement is created for which the validity start date lies in the past.
Try running the VBOF transaction code for the agreement number for which sales volume needs to be updated.
Enter the validity date as 31.12.9999
Enter the sales area.
Posting date as today's date.
Check Error flag box and choose Drill down processing.
Uncheck the control boxes.
Try if this helps you.
Regards,

Rebates : partial settlement and finall settlement in same order type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for