Receiver Agreement for Integration Process

Dear All
I am facing a strange problem when I am sending a message via proxy to SAP PI whci is then supposed to forward it to a legacy system.
I am using a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process

Hi,
>>>a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process
use the integration directory wizard and create two configurations
- ECC - PI (integration process)
- PI (BPM) - to the legacy
then it will work - this is not an error but lack of configuration
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Similar Messages

Enhanced Receiver determination - for Integration Process

Hi,
Just wanted to confirm that if it is possible to have more than one Receivers, with Enhanced Receiver Determination and one of the Receiver happens to be Integration Process. I know with Enhanced Receiver Determinations you can find more than one Receivers at Run time, however the key question is, if in addition to normal Receiver Systems (like SAP R/3 or Web Services etc), if we can also kickoff Integration Process within Enhanced Receiver Determination.
Thanking in advance.

as said by Udo Martens
Assumedly the different receivers are using different Inbound Interfaces (a BP is using an Abstract Interface). Therefore you would need for each different receiver a own Interface Determination referring a own mapping.
refer this wiki http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/pointstab/viewpageversion.action?pageId=131760630&version=5 to Know how to configure Enhanced receiver determination and Interface determination for each receiver .
In your case one of the receiver will be Integration process

Receiver Determination for Integration Process - R/3

Hi,
While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
Kindly, reply me.
Regards,
dinesh.

>
Dinesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
>
> I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
>
> /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
>
> Kindly, reply me.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> dinesh.
did you import the BAPI?
Your receiver system will be the SAP BS. when you use the f4 help option for the interface it will list the BAPI and u can select it

Integrated Configuration- Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender

Hi , I am using AAE in PI 7.1 and it is proxy to file scenrios.
When Ia m doing testing in Integration Directory in test configuration its giving me this error .
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> to receiver -BS_D_EPS,http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications.Qualifications_Async_Out: No receiver agreement found for , -<ECCBUSINESSSYSTEM> , BS_D_EPS, http://abc.com/sap/pi/HR/Qualifications, Qualifications_Async_Out
( here it should take interface Qualifications_Async_In, but logs says it is pointing to outbound interface)
here when I am going in to trace logs then it seems that are not able to understand the receiver interface . rather then it is taking sender inface in logs..
In trace logs . I am getting
Receiver Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Start with given receiver - BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Using Receiver Determination 00000000000000000000000000000000 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No Relation found - accept given Receivers. </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...extracting Receiver from Header: BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Classic Receiver Determination via Rules. </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">...create rule engine </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">No Receiver found behaviour: 0 </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of Receivers:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Interface Determination
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service BS_D_EPS </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) BS_D_EPS Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: Qualifications_Async_Out </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
Operation Mapping
<Not found>
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace>
<Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping configured </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
I have developed the other integrated configuration scenario and this is working fine .
please let me know how can I troubleshoot it

I am using sender as Soap and receiver as File adapter.
here the problem is that while going for interface deteremination and receiver agreement it is calling to Outbound interface .
It should call the inbound interface. I put all the details correctly and deleted all the objects and crated again for both Ir and Id..
I put the name of inbound interface in configuration but while executing its calling outbound interface.

How to configure Integration Directory for Integration process async sync

Hi Experts,
I am confused about doing configuration in Integration Directory i.e receiver determination,interface determination and receiver agreement and sender agreement for my integration process as it involve synchronous send at target side.
In my Scenario , we get Purchase order request(asynchronously) from SRM system in proxy xml format which we have to map to Cxml format send it to third party system(say system 2) as http request.Then we will recieve a response from system2 in Cxml format through HTTP.Now,we have to map this response as to SRM system via proxy code for successful and error case .If error occured we also have to mail to the respective department about the error occured via mail adapter.Proxy to XI is a asynchronous communication and XI to System2 is a synchronous communication .Then again XI to SRM is a asynchronous communication via proxy.I have request and response External defination for Cxml i.e HTTP side.
I have done following integration process in ESR
Start- Receive(1)---Transformation(2)-send(3)-Fork(4)--
stop
...................................................................................................... .....[----Branch 1 [-Transformation(5)-Send(6)-
.......................[-----Branch 2 -
SWITCH STEP to check error code[
............................................................................................................[.otherwise branch of switch
Fork(4)----[
.......................[----Branch 1-Transformation (9)-send(10)-
Here,
Recieve(1) -- is used for recieve request from SRM.Mode is asynchronous
Transforamtion(2)-- is used for operation mapping between request of SRM to HTTP request.
send(3) --is used to sending request synchronous to HTTP,mode is synchronous,used synchronous abstract interface,abstract reqhttp and abstract resphttp
switch-switch Branch1 is used for checking error response to be true---
Transformation(5)--- is used to map HTTP response to Mail response structure
Send(6)----
is used to send mail content to Mail adapter
Transformation(9)---- is used to map HTTP response to Proxy response
Send(10) --- used to send mapped proxy response to SRM as to update status by calling calling Function module using proxy code.
Thanks
Deepak

Deepak,
In BPM data does not flow in Backword direction!
take any step in your BPM the message it is goiong to receive will be what a step just before it is giving to BPM.
Now in your case
IR Part:
You have to call Third part Synchronously and the input to it will be what Proxy has given to you.
Create an Abstract Synchronous(in case of abstract you need not bother it is Inbound or Outbound) in which(I mean the Message Interface) The Output message will be what you have Received from Proxy and the input message will be what you are going to receive from the Third party as a Response. Now you would have Inbound Synchronous Interface created for calling Third party.
Have a Interface Mapping between the Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous Message Interface.
ID Part:
For synchronous Step: BPM will; be sender with Message Interface Abstarct Synchronous
Third Party will be receiver With Inbound Interface(Synchronous). Use the INterface Mapping between Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous that You have created in IR.
Have a Receiver Agreement for the Thirs part.
No Sender agreement required in case of BPM as a Sender.
Thanks,
Sunil Singh

Problem in creating Receiver Agreement using Integration Directory API

Hello Experts,
We are developing a scenario where we are creating "REceiver Agreement" through Integration Directory API.
This requires certain parameters like Sender component, Interface, Communication Channel & Namespace to be set in the code.The required Communication Channel & Components already exist in Integration Directory .
Our concern is that we are not able to retreive this Communication Channel's ID through the code in order to set it as a parameter for Receiver Agreement generation.
Can anybody pls advice??
Thanks in advance,
Suraj.

Hi Stefan,
We tried using query on communication channel, but could not do it as we could not get a method which accepts name of communication channel as parameter.
We used "CommunicationChannelQueryIn" related methods in the API.
But still could not retreive the Communication Channel ID of an existing Communication Channel.
Please help.

Unable to clone File Adapter receiver channel for parallel processing

Hi Experts,
I am using variable substitution for File - RFC - File with out BPM scenario(using request response, oneway bean).
While i placed the file in the sender FTP folder, the file didnt get picked up, but in communication channel monitoring, i am getting error ' Unable to clone File Adapter receiver channel for parallel processing'.
Can anybody provide me suggestions to solve this error.
Note : without variable substitution , the interface is working good.
Is it due to, i am trying the source structure field in response file adapter?

Hi,
In your CC, do you use some additional paramaters ?
like these one of point 47/48 of [Oss note 821267 - FAQ: XI 3.0 / PI 7.0/ PI 7.1 File Adapter|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/821267]
Maybe there is conflict with a parallel connexion and the bean used to do asynch-synch bridge...
Mickael

No receiver agreement for the sender "xyz" to receiver "abc" found

in SXMB_MONI i am getting the following error message when the data has been sent from the IDOC
No receiver agreement for the sender "xyz" to receiver "abc" found
I have specified 3 receiver agreements and a Default receiver (in configured receivers)
so in any case, it should pick it as the receiver
but, still I am getting the above error message
any one faced same kind of issue?
regards,
nikhil.

Hi Nikhil,
Correct me if I understood it wrongly.
You need to copy the IDOC xml data and copy it for testing. XSD is the definition for your XML data.
You should not copy the XSD as the input to the Mapping program.
Follow this steps:
- Go to your Mapping Program
- Click on Test tab
- Click on the SRC tab and copy your XML data here not XSD.
Thanks
Srini
Thanks
Srini

Logical System for Integration Process

I am getting a error message for my Integration Process: "Unable to convert sender service IP_Kleinschmidt_Shipments to an ALE logical system"
I am confused as to what i need to put in the IP -> Service -> Adapter Specific Identifires ->Logical System.
I won't let me enter either the R3 system nor the XI system.
What value do I need to put here so my acknoldgement can go back to the R3 system?

Use header mapping in receiver agreement to apply a business system as sender of the Idoc message.
That business system must have a logical system aplied and this should be maintained in R/3 as well.
if you use XI system as logical system as IDoc receiver in R/3, then you can apply also XI as sender here.
But you have to load the PI as business system to ID for this reason.
You cannot apply a logical system to the business system, which already used elsewhere.
I discused that issue with the developer a couple of years ago. He told me to use the workaround.

Missing receiver agreement for incoming IDoc

Hi guys,
I transfer IDoc's from a SAP-system to XI to start a ccBPM-process
For that I don't need a receiver agreement.
But why I get always the error message "No receiver agreement found for sender -<SAP-SYSTEM> to receiver -<integration process>" ?
For other IDoc which coming from the same system but starting another process everything is working fine!!!
I don't understand that.
Could somebody help me please? Thanks very much in advance.
Regards, Thomas

Hi,
please can you check in transaction SXI_CACHE if the return code for the IP is 0.
Also, for the Interface that are working is it the same scenario SAP to IP with IDocs on the Outbound?
Regards
Vijaya

Multiple Queue Assignment for Integration Process - PI 7.11

Hi,
I am trying to configure multiple Queues for an Integration Process.
The Integration Process is straight forward, except for a Asynchronous Request Response pattern with correlation. (A asynch send step - immediately followed by a asynchronous receive step with Correlation)
I have done the following
1) In IR set the Queue as Multiple - Content Specific
2) In SWF_INB_CONF transaction reconfigured Multiple Queues - Content Specific without buffering
But when I trigger the message, the message is not at all triggering/entering the Integration Process. The error message is BPE Internal Failure.
But if I reconfigure the IP as One Configurable Queue & "Without Buffering", it is working. But we want multiple queues assigned to this Process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Bjoern, there are blogs/wikis available which should be searched before a question is asked on forum. The information you need is quite basic one and I will therefore lock this thread.
Regards,
Prateek

Adapter Specific Paramters for Integration Process in Configuration

I want to send the data from flat file to idoc through BPM
While doing configuration do I need to explicitly give Adapter specific parameters(Logical System Name) for BPM(Integration Process) or not?
Is it mandatory to give Adapter Specific Parameters for this scenario?
FILE-->BPM--->IDOC(R/3)
Thanks & Regards
Katta Mohan Reddy

Hi,
why would you require Adapter specific parameters (I assume you mean Adapter specific Attributes) - Logical System should be there through the routing (Receiver Determination). What exactly do you want to accomplish by that?
regards,
Peter

Alternative for integration process ?

The XI integration process functionality for me looks like another example of overkill design in XI. Needs lots of additional abstract message interface declarations, difficult to follow what really happens.
Question: what alternatives in XI are possible without breaking the architecure completely ? E.g. when I have to perform some simple connected steps, like call an RFC, then load a file via FTP, then send out an email with the result data. Where in XI could I define a Java or ABAP method which does that programmatically ? The communication channels have some module processors. Would that be the right place ( define a module processor in channel which receives the trigger). Are there standard functions in XI available in Java or ABAP to perform RFC, FTP...
or is it better to do it in a Java or ABAP mapping ? This does not seem to make much sense.
Any experiences or ideas ?
CSY

hi,
the complete lauch of xi is to have common place for all designed interfaces and configuration and monitoring stuffs.
client b4r getting in to xi should read his landscape and justify whether to bring in xi r not, when this step is not done, questions as mentioned above would arise around
what is the need of xi for simple function which i can do by abap , java , jco s etc..(many ask ))
but beauty of xi is tapped when the landscape around it is growing and when u want to intergrate those all systems.
i guess it's better to have xi standard congf instead peeping in to other hindden programs to do same , as it would be easily visible to all developer who come in .
IP is the class idea and u shud think if u r flow has more logic in between to be manipulated.
In in the end the moral is that every system is capable of meeting the requirment we shud be in search of which can be trusted and maitained easily as a long run ) everything is possible.
rgds
srini
Edited by: Venkateswarlu Srinivas on Jul 9, 2008 3:19 PM

Problem when creating receiver agreement for File to IDOC scenario

I have done the following :
1. Created two business systems one for the file system and other for the R3 system and also I created two communication channel, one as sender communication channel and one as receiver communication channel.
2. Created the receiver determination
3. Created the interface determination
4. Created the sender agrement
5. Now when I was trying to create the receiver agreement I want to assign the receiver communication channel i have created to the receiver agreement but the F4 help gives me no records and I am thus stuck at this point.
Please suggest me how to proceed forward from here.

Hi ,
5. Now when I was trying to create the receiver agreement I want to assign the receiver communication channel i have created to the receiver agreement but the F4 help gives me no records and I am thus stuck at this point.
Make sure that your created communication channel for reciever is under the respective reciever business system and give the same while creating the reciver agrement.
sekhar

Idoc to flat file using Integration process does not show up at all

Hello All,
I created a scenario IDOC to Flat File using Integration Process and one without IntegrationProcess. I am able to execute the one without Integration Process easily.
However when I send the IDOC from SAP then the Integration Process scenario just does not work.
I Checked SXMB_MONI There is no entry for the Integration Process.I can see entry for other without Integration Process.
SXI_CACHE : I can see my Integration Process active
SWEQADM : I have activated the Event Queue and Background job
SWF_XI_ADM_BPE : ALL BPE is showing green status.
All syntax check on IP are fine.
There is no Basis Help for me so there could be some additional basis steps which need to be configured. Has anyone faced such an issue with Integration Process?
Regards
Prashanta

Hope this might help you. when u configure an IDoc as Sender with BPM this is how you proceed.
1. let us split the scenario into two.
a. Sender to BPM ( Integration Process).
b. BPM to Receiver.
2. First let us configure the first Sender to BPM.
a. Sender Agreement( Not required ).
b. Receiver Agreement( NOT Required).
c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service, Outbound Interface, Receiver Service(Integration Process).
d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface(Sender Abstract Interface), Message Mapping(NOT Required if your using transformation stepin Integration Process)).
3. Now let us configure the Second BPM to Receiver.
a. Sender Agreement( NOT Required)
b. Receiver Agreement( Sender Service(Integration process), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver service, Inbound Interface).
c. Receiver Determination( Sender Service(Integration Process), Receiver Abstarct Interface,Receiver Service).
d. Interface Determination( Inbound Interface, Message Mapping(NOT Required)).
So Finally we have One Receiver Agreement, Two Receiver Determinations, Two Interface Determinations.
Please let me know if you have any more queries.
Regards
Gopi

Receiver Agreement for Integration Process

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for