Receiver agreement not visible in receiver determination( ID)

Hi,
I could not see receiver agreement in receiver determination in ID.
Even i could see my receiver agreement in ID.
Give some inputs to solve this issue.
Thanks & regards,
Ruban

Hi,
I did as u said..even though i could not see receiver agreement in receiver determination.
One more issue is in interface determination, if i select type of interface determination as Enhanced i could able to select name and Name space in inbound interface and interface mapping.
If i select type of interface determination as standard i could not see name , name space for inbound interface and interface mapping.
Thanks
Ruban

Similar Messages

Interface mapping is not visible in receiver determination

Hi,
I could not see interface mapping in my receiver determination in ID.
I can see the message interface and receiver agreement in receiver determination
my scenario is idoc to soap (SAP R3 to webservice)
Thanks
Ruban

hi,
could you plz check as Sheshagiri and Phani have said.
Also wanted to know,are u using the configuration wizard for creating ur business scenario and not finding ur interface mapping?
if so is the case then try creating manually ur reciever determination and add ur interface mapping(if u have already done as said by phani and seshagiri) by inserting it.
let us know how it went.
thanks,
ahmed

Sender and receiver agreement not cerated

Hi .
I am creating configuration scenario in ID by importing the integration scenario which i created in the IR.
I crated communication channel template also and i added it to the integration scenario in connections.
Query 1?
do i have to create Communication channels also.....even After creating communication channel template (because it is not seen the ID below communication channel )
Query 2 ?
once i transfer this integration scenario from IR to ID and cerate the configuration scenario (sender and receiver agreements are not getting created automatically)peace tell me what is the reason???.
and how can i resolve this...
thanks
shakif

Hi Mohamed,
Query 1?
do i have to create Communication channels also.....even After creating communication channel template
Yes You have to create as it's just a template that u created in IR. But u can use the same for creating CC.
Check this link for what's the Diff. B/w CCT in IR and CC in ID
Re: Communication Channels
Query 2 ?
once i transfer this integration scenario from IR to ID and cerate the configuration scenario
Yes. it will create automatically.
Just check my posting in Wiki for simple File to IDOC scenario might be u missing something
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/fileToIDOC&
and check my reply in this thread
Re: Doubt in transfering integration scenario from IR
Regards
Sachin

Error : Receiver agreement not found

Hi all,
My scenario is RFC to JDBC.
Its showing the below error, when 'I try to send data through test configuration after configuring ESR and ID part.
Receiver Agreement
Runtime error
Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -SAP_BL_ISU to receiver -RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1: No standard agreement found for , SAP_BL_ISU, , RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest, urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions, ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-SAP_BL_ISU </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">No standard agreement found for , SAP_BL_ISU, , RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest, urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions, ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
please suggest me...

Hi,
This is configuration issue, please check the ESR sender/Receiver interfaces and the associated
Sender / Receiver agreement and the associated communication channels are configured correctly.
Try to test the configuration using Test configuration / send a test message from RWB to this interface.
If the configuration is correct and you are facing the same issue. try to delete the ID configuration and recreate it.
Before re-creating the configuration, do cache refresh.
Regards
Bhargava Krishna

Indbound Interface not visible in Receiver business service

Hello Experts-
II have created a business service.
After creating the business service, when try to enter receiver inbound interfaces.
The message interface which I declared in IR is not visible .
I am not able to select it as its not visible.
When I manually input the name system display object doesnt exist. But, In IR I can see its there. Do I have to do any kind of import?
I am doing a Flat file to RFC scenario.
Thanks,
raj.

Yes. Below is little more detail descripition on what i did.
In IR design , this is what I have
MI_filetype (outbound asynchronous) and I have assigned its message type (mt_filetype) to it.
In message mapping I have mapped
mt_filetype to RFC message (ZFILEtype)
mapped the source interface MI_filetype to Target interface ZFILETYPE.
I have sucessfully tested interface mapping. .
Activated the change list.
In IR configuration,
I have created a scenario and then Busniess service for sender. and create dit communication channel.
In next step business service for receiver, I am assuming the receiver inbound interface would be MI_filetype?
Is that not right?
Thanks,
Raj

When is Receiver Agreement not needed?

Hi all,
I was going through the BPM logs and in one of the logs Jai Shankar had suggested that "we don't need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract"
Now I have several questions
1. In what cases will the target MI be Abstract? Why and when would we do that?
2. Why don't we need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract? What is the logic behind that.
3. Is there some other cases when Receiver aggrement is not needed.
Thank You

Hi Sonia,
>>. In what cases will the target MI be Abstract? Why and when would we do that?
Abstract MI are used with in BPM. So if you are sending a msg into a BPM(the target is BPM), then you dont need a Receiver Agreement.
>>2. Why don't we need a receiver aggrement if our target MI is Abstract? What is the logic behind that.
Receiver Agreement is just to create a binding between your communication channel with your scenario, but imagine when the target is BPM you dont need any commn. channel at all. So no receiver agreement.
>>3. Is there some other cases when Receiver aggrement is not needed.
No. In all other cases, Receiver agreement is mandatory.
Regards,
Jai Shankar

Unloading Point & Receiving Point Not Visible in Invoice.

Hi All,
I have one condition type YFRT which is get updated on Unloading Point & Receiving Point.
I want to update it in Invoice but in invoice nowhere i can see Unloading Point & Receiving Point.
ie. which gets copied from SO.
Now its showing Unloading Point & Receiving Point missing when i update the condition in Invoice.
Condition record is maintained on Unloading Point & Receiving Point.
How to proceed?
Reg,
Antaa21

Hi
Does it get populated in your sales order ? THe reason I ask is that if you calculate the condition in the order and do not recalculate it at the time of invoicing you should get the condition copied as-is.
Anyway, if you need to fill the shipping point in the pricing structure, KOMK, you can use exit RV60AFZZ. Here you can add a logic telling the system where to find the value and set it in the invoice pricing.
Does it help you ?
best regards
Michael

AS2 adapter not visible in Receiver Communication Channel (Adapter Type)

Hi,
We wish to connect to our customer using AS2 adapter as the receiver communication channel.
We are unable to find the "AS2 adapter type in the in "adapter type" field. (Choose Adapter Metadata).
Our XI version is as following (NW04S_11_REL Service Pack 11).
Version
Service pack:
11
Release:
NW04S_11_REL
Is there add-on to be installed on XI or is there any activation required?
Thanks in Advance,
Rehan

SAP_BASIS
Release 700
Level 0011
Highest Support Package: SAPKB70011

Pics are not visible in received mail

This has been happening a lot. Someone will send me an email with a picture or multiple pictures in it, and instead of the pictures I get little blue boxes with question marks in them. When I right click on the box, there is a single option "download image" but it doesn't seem to do anything. Nothing shows up anywhere.

I had lots of gremlins with mail dissapearing after installing tiger but have resolved them. Now the slideshow feature has gone, it was there when I first opened mail under tiger but it has since vanished. The earlier reference to button on top right corner is a puzzle, as, when I click on mine all that happens is the munu bar shrinks. The photos are shown on my emails but the slideshow has just vanished, just as I was finding this useful. Any ideas

Message not visible but received

I would like to send a print screen to show what happen but i don't find how to join the picture in tis message.

Error is as follow
Horodatage : 08/05/2014 19:07:42
Avertissement : Couleur attendue, mais « top » trouvé. Erreur d'analyse de la valeur pour « background-image ». Déclaration abandonnée.
Fichier Source : https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/
Ligne : 1, Colonne : 472125

Interface mapping not visible in interface determination

Hi,
when i create Interface determination in ID i could see Message interface and i could not my Interface mapping in that.
It is saying no objects found.
when i select enhanced instead of standard i could see my Interface mapping
plz give some idea reg. this
Thanks

Hi,
Check if there is any Interface mapping available between the Outbound Message Interface name and Inbound Message Interface name which you are using in your Interface Determination. Check carefully.
Thanks
aMit

"No receiver agreement found" for BPM ???

Hi everybody
I think this could be an issue in the cache. I have a ccBPM and when I am sending the message who starts the BPM to the Integration Engine I got the following error:
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -BS_SQL_Database to receiver -IP_ScanningStatus_01,http://xxxx.com/common/scanning.MI_JDBC_Response_Asyn_ABS</SAP:Stack>
IP_ScanningStatus_01 is an integration process and you do not need a receiver agreement ("not required" in receiver determination) to send a message to an integration process. Two weeks ago the process work and the very strange is, that in sxi_cache it shows the 31.07.2006 as last change/activation, but I did an activation yesterday. A full cache refresh did not change anything and the status of the cache is "up to date". We are on SP14 (:-<)
Regards Oliver

Hi Udo
yes, that is exacly my problem.
I deleted the corresponding processes in the repository and in the configuration. I recreated the process in the repository under the same name and after that I tried to import the porces in the configuration under the same name, but now I got the following error:
Unable to transport object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxxx.com/common/scanning (CE_ONESAP_ACETATE_MFG_xx, 1.0 of celanese.com) of type RepBProcess from application REPOSITORY on system REPOSITORY. Detailed information: Attempt to serialize the generic part of object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxx.com/common/scanning failed(serialization problem)
Any Ideas?
How can I delete the old process out of cache?
Regards Oliver

Receiver and Interface Determination, Sender and Receiver Agreement

Hi Experts,
Could you please tell me, what Receiver Determination, Interface Determination, Sender Agreement and Receiver Agreement we have to use for the below blog.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
Regards
Sara

Hi Sara,
WS->BP
Receiver Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine the BP
Interface Determination: Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS determine your start msg IF (abstr IF) and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: SOAP sender channel for that Sender IF, Sender NS, Sender BS
Receiver Agreement: not reqired
BP->DB
Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (DB)
Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: not reqired
Receiver Agreement: JDBC receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
BP->File
Receiver Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine the 3rd party BS (File)
Interface Determination: BP IF (abstr), BP IF NS, BP determine Inbound-IF and IF mapping
Sender Agreement: not required
Receiver Agreement: File receiver channel for that Inbound IF, NS and 3rd party BS
Regards,
Udo

Receiver Agreement problem in XI

Hi,
The problem is that when the idoc calls adapter in XI, the following error message is thrown(Display XML Message Versions- window, SOAP Header):
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.ConfigException: ConfigException in XI protocol handler. Failed to determine a receiver agreement for the given message. Root cause: com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.impl.exception.CPALookupException: Couldn't retrieve outbound binding for the given P/S/A values: FP=;TP=;FS=our_sender;TS=our_receiver;AN=WorkCenterMasterData;ANS=our_namespace
I have checked that the Receiver Agreements are configured right, there should not be problem with that. So what could be the problem? We just updated our XI to SP19, could this affect to idoc processing?

Hi,
I have got a couple of times that Receiver agreement not found even though I have receiver agreement. Also I have done some dummy changes and tried out. Also I have stopped and started the receiver communication channel. But it have not worked. Then I have started and stopped the File Adapter but that doesnot worked. I have done all the cache refreshes but the issue is not resolved.
Then finally just restarted the machine and it worked fine. So there are some caches which is not refreshing when we do the cache refreshes. They are only refereshing when we reboot. Can you also try all these steps and if you dont get success then try to bounce the system and check.
---Satish

Getting Receiver Agreement issue in IDOC to File scenario

Hi Gurus,
 Need your help. I'm working on a IDOC to File scenario. I'm using CREMDM.CREMDM04 as outbound Interface & small structure VEND_FILE_IN_MI as Inbound Interface. Though I've configured the receiver Communication Channel as a File Adapter with proper Inbound Interface I'm seeing the message getting failed which is showing CREMDM.CREMDM04 as both Outbound & Inbound interface and pointing a Receiver Agreement issue . The Receiver service is coming Properly, only the Interface is coming wrong as the sender interface. I've checked both Receiver Agreement & Receiver determination and found the Receiver Service, Communication Channel & Interface are perfectly mapped there, I cross checked the same Configurations in IE via SXI_CACHE after full Cache copy.
Error Message:
No receiver agreement found for sender -SAPERP to receiver -IDOC2FileReceiver,urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
Error Category : Outbounding
Error ID : CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND
My IR design:
Sender:
 Interface : VEND_IDOC_OUT_MI
 Message Type : CREMDM.CREMDM04
Receiver:
 Interface : VEND_FILE_IN_MI
 Message Type : VEND_IN_MT , Data Type VEND_FILE_DT
My ID Config:
1. Sender / Outbound Message: Service Type --> Business System
 Service ---> SAPERP
 Interface--> VEND_IDOC_OUT_MI
 Adapter Type : IDOC
2. Receiver / Inbound Message: Service Type --> Business Service
 Service --> IDOC2FileReceiver
 Interface ---> VEND_FILE_IN_MI
 Adapter Type--> File
3. In Sender Agreement : Specified the Sender Communication Channel
 VEND_IDOC_OUT_Channel
4. In Receiver Agreement Configured the receiver service IDOC2FileReceiver aging sender service SAPERP & Interface VEND_IDOC_OUT_MI.
5. In Interface Determination Specified the Inbound Interface VEND_FILE_IN_MI and Interface Mapping VEND_IDOC_FILE_IMAP
6. In Receiver Agreement specified the receiver communication Channel IDOC2FileChannel against Receiver Service & Interface.
I used the Configuration wizard in my second attempt to make sure the sequence of configuration.
Can anyone help me identifying what's going wrong. I'm very new to XI and basically this is the first assignment I'm working on.
Regards,
Subhadip

Hi Babu,
 In the Inbound data type all the fields have MinOccurance = 0 and MaxOccurances unbounded.
Please find the XSD:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="http://adc.com/poc/sample" targetNamespace="http://adc.com/poc/sample">
 <xsd:complexType name="VEND_FILE_DT">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 8f584d80456311dccd680018fe79f69b
 </xsd:appinfo>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:sequence>
 <xsd:element name="VENDCODE" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 a8653cb0390c11dc843000188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor Code
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="VENDNAME1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 a8653cb4390c11dc84e800188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor name4
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="ORT01" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 a8653cb5390c11dcbe3400188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor City
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="PFACH" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 a8653cb6390c11dc896100188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor PO Box
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="STRAS" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 4811db0335fd11dc9e9600188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor House No & Street
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="PSTLZ" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 4811db0435fd11dc98b000188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor Postal Code
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="LAND1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 4811db0535fd11dc870500188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Vendor Country
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="STCD1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 7ca8d600403b11dcc9bd00188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Tax Number 1
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="TELF1" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 9abaee7040e611dcce4300188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Telephone number
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="STCEG" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 9abaee7140e611dc8f3900188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 VAT Registration Number
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="LIFNR" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 9abaee7240e611dccef700188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 <xsd:documentation xml:lang="EN">
 Account Number of Vendor or Creditor
 </xsd:documentation>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 <xsd:element name="ALTKN" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
 <xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">
 9abaee7340e611dcb3bc00188bd09370
 </xsd:appinfo>
 </xsd:annotation>
 <xsd:simpleType>
 <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
 <xsd:minLength value="0" />
 <xsd:maxLength value="50" />
 </xsd:restriction>
 </xsd:simpleType>
 </xsd:element>
 </xsd:sequence>
 </xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>

Receiver agreement not visible in receiver determination( ID)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for