Receiver determination for ALEAUD??

Hi,
    I have configured my ALEAUD for a (B2B partner) R3 -> PI (B2b) - > PI (local) - >  R3 (local) scenario... I have requested the partner PI system to map their systems to my business systems in their Receiver determination step - header mapping.... But the reverse step of sending back AleAUD is falling in our partners system because of the changed business system names...
I am not able map the ALEAUD back to the original Business sytems used by the partners....Although  I have created a receiver aggrement the std Aleaud does not pick it up.
I would like to avoid using the ALEAUD as a seperate message approach.
Regards,
Arvind R

Hi Arvind,
Refer this links. Hope it will help you.
Custom processing for ALEAUD01 messages ??
Re: XML Incoming Invoices - Send response to Vendor for Failed Messages in XI
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination for synchronous interface.

    Hello!
    Was anyone faced with the Enhanced Receiver Determination? When I try to create
    the definition of the Interface Mapping, I get the error:
    "Interface modi are different. Source interface Message Interface MI_My_sync_iface | urn:my is synchronous. Target interface Message Interface ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous"
    Thank you.

    Hi ,
    U can go through below limks  :
    Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios
    Enhanced Receiver Determination in SAP XI - Exchange Infrastructure - Wiki
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/enhanced%2breceiver%2bdetermination%2bin%2bsap%2bxi
    Thanks

  • Receiver Determination for Integration Process - R/3

    Hi,
    While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
    I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
    /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    Kindly, reply me.
    Regards,
    dinesh.

    >
    Dinesh Kumar wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
    >
    > I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
    >
    > /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    >
    > Kindly, reply me.
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > dinesh.
    did you import the BAPI?
    Your receiver system will be the SAP BS. when you use the f4 help option for the interface it will list the BAPI and u can select it

  • Dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface

    Hello everybody,
    I want to use dynamic receiver determination for a synchron scenario.
    The problem is, that the interface 'ReceiverDetermination' (http://sap.com/xi/XI/System SAP BASIS 7.00) is a asynchron interface.
    This leads to an error when activating the Interface-Mapping (synch source Interface -> asynch destination Interface ReceiverDetermination)
    Is there a way to use the dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface?
    Thanks a lot,
    Thomas

    Hi Thomas,
    I guess your scenario is not possible ASIS, since XI doesn't support 1:n for sync interfaces (and even if your mapping condition reduces it to 1:1, actually it is still 1:n, since your receiver list is unbounded).
    Theoretically, you could make it work with BPM, though.
    But I've never worked with a Receiver Determination Step reading from an enhanced receiver determination in ID (though there should be no problems).
    Use sync async bridge, then use receiver determination step to obtain the receiver from an enhanced Receiver Determination. Pay attention that this enhanced receiver determination is a dummy one, using a mapping from your async abstract interface to the ReceiverDetermination interface. Once your mapping has determined the receiver, the enhanced receiver determination will return that receiver to the Receiver Determination step in the BPM. Then use this receiver in the sync send step (in mode receiver from receiver list, not from context).
    The receiver determination of the actual sync send step may be a standard one, with the several receivers there (even if there are several there, at the moment of the sending, only one will be used).
    Maybe it will work, maybe not.
    Just try it.
    Regards,
    Henrique.

  • Enhanced Receiver determination - for Integration Process

    Hi,
    Just wanted to confirm that if it is possible to have more than one Receivers, with Enhanced Receiver Determination and one of the Receiver happens to be Integration Process. I know with Enhanced Receiver Determinations you can find more than one Receivers at Run time, however the key question is, if in addition to normal Receiver Systems (like SAP R/3 or Web Services etc), if we can also kickoff Integration Process within Enhanced Receiver Determination.
    Thanking in advance.

    as said by Udo Martens
    Assumedly the different receivers are using different Inbound Interfaces (a BP is using an Abstract Interface). Therefore you would need for each different receiver a own Interface Determination referring a own mapping.
    refer this wiki  http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/pointstab/viewpageversion.action?pageId=131760630&version=5 to Know how to  configure Enhanced receiver determination  and Interface determination for each receiver .
    In your case one of the receiver will be Integration process

  • Receiver determination for a proxy

    I have a sender proxy and I want to configure two receivers for this proxy. But I would like to use a condition. If I now open the condition editor then I do not see the message  in the condition editor. Does anybody has experience with sender proxies and conditions for receiver determination ?

    Hi Frank,
    the interface and the business system are connected in SLD over the product/softwarecomponent which you put in techn/business system. But that does NOT avoid any functionality. It is only useful for help windows in IB directory.
    The "message" you got was only a "information", not an error. Just ignore it. The condition editor should open anyway. You can either "click" there to value of your message or put manually a X-Path expression. If your field is distinct just use the double slash like //myfield to ask for the searched value. The parser will read first element called "myfield" which is found.
    Regards,
    Udo

  • Using Xpath in Receiver Determination for greater than 500

    Hi,
    I am trying to use Xpath in the receiver Determination step and I want to check a field which is at item level and comes multiple times(0-unbounded) greater than 500.I tried with different options per SDN blogs,Xpath functions,but still I couldn't able to get what i am trying.I want to process the message when "quantity" is greater than 500,else I want to ignore the message with no errors.
    I gave like this    /p1: /LIST/item[quantity>499]     EX
    item loop is 0-unbounded and I need to check for every quantity.I selected the check box multi line as well.
    I played around different options,but still did not get what I am looking for.
    please suggest in this regard ,how I need to give the expression.
    Thank you,
    Sri

    Hi,
    For validating that the item field is occuring more than 500 times you need to choose the
    2.The exact XPath would be in your case *(/p1: /LIST/itemquantity[499]EX)*
    This means if the 500 th occurance of the item exists then the condition satisfies that is always true for 500 and above occurance of the item.
    Please revert if the suggestion proves to be helpful.
    cheers,
    Abhishek.
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 10:55 PM
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 11:02 PM
    Edited by: Abhishek  Paul on May 6, 2010 11:08 PM

  • Receiver determination for Split Message - Bulk message handling

    All,
    I have a scenario where MATMAS message is split to multiple receivers via multi mapping 1:n; the split is based on plant specific data, all works fine the mapping splits the message perfectly.
    The problem I have is in configuring the receiver determiniation. I have put conditions based on plant specific data the message should be distributed to the appropriate receiver. At runtime the MATMAS message received is treated as a bulk message and it produces mutiple sub-documents however in my case if the MATMAS has 3 plant specific data the data is send to all the 3 receivers instead of sending just one message per plant to the appropriate receiver.
    Its IDOC to File scenario on XI 3.0, SP20.
    Receiver Determination:
    /MATMAS05/IDOC/E1MARAM/E1MARCM/WERKS = 'xxxx' -> send to XXXX_receiver
    /MATMAS05/IDOC/E1MARAM/E1MARCM/WERKS = 'yyyy' -> send to YYYY_receiver
    Though the receiver determiniation splits the message by plant it could be that a material is maintained for both xxxx and yyyy plants and in this case both should receive the message but the contents would be different. The problem I have is both messages are delivered to both receivers.
    I appreciate those who have taken the time to read the thread and thank you all in advance supporting with advices.
    / Saj

    Please find attached the source xml before transormation used for the xpath that I have indicated in my original message. From the below message E1MARCM-BESKZ differs on each plant and also has a corresponding warehouse view E1MLGNM where for example LHMG1 value differs for each warehouse.
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    - <MATMAS05>
    - <IDOC BEGIN="1">
    - <E1MARAM SEGMENT="1">
      <MSGFN>005</MSGFN>
      <MATNR>000000000001002201</MATNR>
      <MTART>ZFGS</MTART>
      <MATKL>1111003</MATKL>
    - <E1MAKTM SEGMENT="1">
      <MSGFN>005</MSGFN>
      <SPRAS>E</SPRAS>
      <MAKTX>AA Ni-MH Rechargeable Batteries</MAKTX>
      </E1MAKTM>
    - <E1MARCM SEGMENT="1">
      <WERKS>4911</WERKS>
      <BESKZ>F</BESKZ>
      </E1MARCM>
    - <E1MARCM SEGMENT="1">
      <WERKS>4912</WERKS>
      <BESKZ>X</BESKZ>
      </E1MARCM>
    - <E1MARCM SEGMENT="1">
      <WERKS>5020</WERKS>
      <BESKZ>E</BESKZ>
      </E1MARCM>
    - <E1MARMM SEGMENT="1">
      <MEINH>CS</MEINH>
      </E1MARMM>
    - <E1MLGNM SEGMENT="1">
      <LGNUM>020</LGNUM>
      <LHMG1>2020.000</LHMG1>
      <LETY1>E2</LETY1>
      </E1MLGNM>
    - <E1MLGNM SEGMENT="1">
      <LGNUM>023</LGNUM>
      <LHMG1>2323.000</LHMG1>
      <LETY1>E2</LETY1>
      </E1MLGNM>
    - <E1MLGNM SEGMENT="1">
      <LGNUM>024</LGNUM>
      <LHMG1>2424.000</LHMG1>
      <LETY1>E2</LETY1>
      </E1MLGNM>
    - <E1MVKEM SEGMENT="1">
      <VKORG>4900</VKORG>
      <PRAT1>X</PRAT1>
      </E1MVKEM>
    - <E1MVKEM SEGMENT="1">
      <VKORG>5000</VKORG>
      <PRAT1>/</PRAT1>
      </E1MVKEM>
      </E1MARAM>
      </IDOC>
      </MATMAS05>
    so in this example above:
    Receiver 4911 (WERKS) should receive:
    F + 2020 (BESKZ + LHMG1)
    Receiver 4912 (WERKS) should receive:
    F + 2323 (BESKZ + LHMG1)
    Receiver 5020 (WERKS) should receive:
    F + 2424 (BESKZ + LHMG1)
    The problem is all these 3 messages are delivered to all the 3 plants thus making it 9 messages delivered in total as against 3.
    / Saj

  • Receiver Determination for differnet recordsets

    hi
    i 'm reading some files into the xi with the file adapter and content conversion. the result is a incoming message with some recordsets looking like this:
    MY_MT
      Record
        Row
          FieldA
          FieldB
        /Row
        Row
          FieldA
          FieldB
        /Row
      /Record
    /MY_MT
    my data is in fieldA and a flag for the receiver in fieldB (fieldB = 1 then send row to receiver 1, fieldB = 2 -> receiver 2).
    at configuration i created a receiver determination where i setup 2 different receiver services and then created a condition:
    MY_MT/Record/Row/fieldB = 1 for receiver 1
    MY_MT/Record/Row/fieldB = 2 for receiver 2
    a message like below is send to both receivers, but i just want to send all Rows with fieldB = 1 to receiver 1.
    MY_MT
      Record
        Row
          DATA
          1
        /Row
        Row
          DATA
          2
        /Row
      /Record
    MY_MT
    Is this possible?
    greets
    J.

    Hi
    As par current configuration settings, your choosing a reciver on the basis of flag.
    But same input is given to both recivers.
    What you want is hust separate the content based on flag.
    Two options:
    Conditional reciver:-
    Use two different mapping program for the same.
    In first mapping choose all DAta whose flag is one,
    and in another mapping
    Choose all the data whose flag is two.
    and wonder you will get two different outputs depending on your flag.
    Use multimapping:
    Instead of going for two mapping programs, just go for single mapping program, and just go through the blog
    /people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
    Go for message instance level mapping, It is easy and one time work.....
    and wonder you will get output as
    MY_MT
    Record 
      Row   
      DATA    
    1
       /Row 
    /RecordMY_MT
    MY_MT
    Record
      Row   
      DATA    
    2  
    /Row 
    /RecordMY_MT
    Cheers
    Regards
    Piyush

  • Dynamic receiver Determination for Sync Scenario??

    Hello Experts,
      I have a SOAP -> Xi -> R3 sync scenario i,e, R3 to send back response to SOAP client.
    Also I need the Dynamic receiver determination.
    When I try to create the Interface Mapping, I get the error:
    "Interface modi are different. "
    Source interface MI_My_sync_iface is synchronous.
    Target interface  ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous
    I coud find few threads on forum related to this but i think there is no clear solution provided.
    I do not wanna use BPM.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks in Advance!
    Appropriate point will be awarded.

    > So when I try to define a interface Mapping using a Sync interface as Source and Async interface as target, XI does not allow me to do so.
    You are getting this error because in Interface mapping when you use sync source then it generates request and response tab so if at target side if you put anync interface then definetly it will go into error. You have to make both the interfaces as sync.
    BTW, after getting the message in R3, how are processing the message? Are you using sync proxy??
    You can solve the problem by creating one additional message interface of type inbound-asyn. Use this additional Message interfce in your Interface Determination. And create additional Receiver Agreement to deliver the message to it's destination.
    Note: When you careate additional Interface Determination then you have to chose the response message interface (Sync message interface which returns the response from R3) as a source.
    Regards,
    Sarvesh

  • Receiver Determination for an Outbound Message to Multiple Receivers

    Hi,
    I have a scenario in which one Single Outbound Message needs to be sent to multiple receivers.
    1. I have set up the Receiver Identification correctly i.e I can see the Receiers and their end points.
    2. The problem is that when the first Message fails i.e due to Mapping error , the remaining Receivers do NOT get any messages.
    3. So does XI does a Rollback of the whole set of receivers if first one fails?
    Logically speaking the Message should go to other Receivers even if it fails for one of them.
    I see a Red flag and then a Green flag in SXMB_MONI.
    Please advice.
    Thanks so much.
    A

    Hi,
    I checked the trace log for Receiver Identification.
    It says : Evaluating Condition //VBELN EQ '999999'.
    INVALID RECEIVER : (rec name)
    If the XPATH has turned false why does it still call the same Receiver ??
    The value of VBELN is never 999999.
    Can you please advice?
    Thanks
    Ashish

  • Receiver determination not found for one interface

    Hi,
    I am receiving the message via SOAP and then sending to SAP as IDOC.
    The communication is party o partyless communication.
    I have configured 2 receiver determination for the same sender and receiver but with 2 different interfaces.
    When i test the scenario via SOAP tool only one gets  executed and the second one neither throws an error nor getting executed.
    I think i have a error in the configuration that i did for the 2nd interface since i am using the 1st receiver determination which has been created already ?
    but in the Quick Test tool and Test tool in ID both the receiver determination is working fine.please provide the inputs
    Thanks in advance,
    Rgds,
    Vasanth.

    Hi All,
    Thanks for all of your replies.
    I have activated all the objects and checked it again once.
    As i said earlier the sender and receiver are same and that's why i have been pushed to create 2 receiver determinations for the same file(not IDOC as i said above) to be dropped in to two different locations.
    Also the configuration is party in sender to partyless in receiver.
    To give a clear explantion:
    All the objetcs are activated and works fine when i test in the test tool in ID by specifying the inetrface and namespace.
    Sender1 - Int1 - sap1.com - SA - RD - ID - RA -Receiver1  = working fine when tested by ID test tool
    Sender1 - Int2 - sap2.com -SA- RD - ID - RA Receiver2  = working fine  when tested by ID test tool
    RD = Receiver determination / SA = Sender Agreement
    It is not working when i send the same file thru SOAP client tool and only one receiver determination is working and another is not.
    Any idea ?
    Thanks,
    RGds,
    Vasanth.
    Message was edited by:
            Vasanthakumar Balasubramani
    Message was edited by:
            Vasanthakumar Balasubramani

  • Receiver Determination - Configuration Overview for Receiver Determination

    Hi All,
    I was trying on some tutorial for Calling RFC(sender) and creating a File at Receiver site.
    I've configured all the required setting at the Design: Integration Builder.
    As for Configuration: Integration Builder. Until the Step where I required to setup the Receiver Determination, there is this part "Configuration Overview for Receiver Determination". where i have to maintain the "Receiver Service", else i will hit this error "Enter the receiver service".
    The steps which i followed was :
    1. Create 2 Communication Channel for Sender/Receiver in the Business System.
    2. Create a Sender agreement.
    3. Create a Receiver agreement.
    4. Create a Interface determination.
    5. Lastly "Configure the Overview for Receiver Determination"  for   Receiver Determination
    The problem which I'm facing now is I have nothing in the "Configure the Overview for Receiver Determination" at all even i have created the sender/receiver agreement and interface determination.
    While some troubleshooting, under the If No Receiver Is Found, Proceed as Follows: I tried choosing the "Continue Message Processing with the Following Receiver" radio button and choose the Receiver for the Service then hit the save button.
    The error "Enter the receiver service". pop up but now, the Receiver service was shown under the "Configure the Overview for Receiver Determination". When i try choosing back the "Terminate Message Processing with Error (Restart Possible) and hit the Save button. The Receiver service goes missing again.
    Any Idea what happen ? or anything i missed out ? thanks in advance.

    Hello
    Check if you have the issue in the kba #1538009 Error When Executing Open - Object not found.
    Also see note #1466011 Usability Improvements in Directory:
    o Don't show deleted objects in navigation tree
    When you delete an object in Directory the link to this object is not
    automatically deleted from Configuration Scenario. You need to manually
    open every scenario and remove such 'broken' link. In scenario editor
    broken links are displayed in grey font and therefore can be easily
    identified. Unfortunately the navigation tree in 7.1 (in contrast to
    XI3.0) doesn't make difference between existing and broken links and
    shows them as they all leads to existing objects.
    Regards
    Mark

  • Receiver determination in BPM

    Hi Folks,
        I wanted to send a message to 2 receivers from 1 sender using BPM. People on SDN advice that I have to use 3 receiver determinations for it. I just can't understand why to use 2 receiver determinations where as I have only 2 receivers. Why shall I use a receiver determination for the sender ? Can anybody explain this logic ?
    Regards,
      Santosh

    HI Chandra,
    There will be only one reciever determination.
    In reciever determination what can be done is one sender and recievers will be two as
    well as ineterface determination and reciever agreement will be 2.
    Can you explain how is this possible?....In the first receiver determination the connection will be done for Sender --> BPM.....
    In second BPM---> Receiver1
    In third BPM--->Receiver2
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Receive data for same IDOC from 2 different scenarios

    Hello,
    I have already scenario that received xml file and transfer data to IDOC (The IDOC is purchase order).
    This scenario works fine.
    Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
    The problem is in integration builder u2013
    When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.
    How can I solve this issue?
    Elad

    Hi Elad,
    +Now I try to add more scenarios. This scenario takes files from other xml source work with new mapping and transfer data to same IDOC.
    The problem is in integration builder u2013
    When I try to create receiver agreement the message the message "Object already exists" appear.+
    Does this mean that the other xml source is from the same party? If yes, then that party is already configured in your receiver agreement as explained by the error "Object already exists".
    If the xml source is from a different party. What you can do is to delete the existing receiver determination. Make a new one and replace the party with an "*", in that way, increasing the parties would only consist of one receiver determination for that particular interface. You would only have to add sender and receiver agreements.
    Hope this helps,

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to create playlists on all devices from a single shared iTunes music library?

    i have an iMac.  my kids each have their own iMac.  my wife has a PC.  all three of their devices can "see" my shared iTunes library on their computer.  all three of those devices can play my shared iTunes library on their computer.  BUT, those other

  • All my apps I downloaded a few a go were gone in my purchased items in the app store, what happened?

    When I checked my app store recent purchases, all my apps were gone except for the very recent purchases. Even my apps I got from the itunes 5 year anniversery were gone but the apps were still in the itunes library. Also my ipad can't sync it, it sa

  • Tax Code does not appear in services PO at Services line item

    Dear Experts, I am trying to create a services PO with tax code. The tax code should be entered at Services Line item level not the PO line item level. But I can not see Tax Code field in the line item level. Although I have activated the the option

  • Peoplesoft VM template

    Hi, I created an virtual machine from the database server template (OVM_EL5U2_X86_64_HCM91_PVM downloaded from edelivery) and encountered the following problems : 1. On the first boot of the machine I configured the database to be started on boot (de

  • Adding fields on click of button

    Hi All The requirement is - There is a form for user to put in his educational detail. On click of a button, the same form appears below the existing form for user to put in more educational qualification. I have created a view in a webdynpro project