Receiver Determination for Integration Process - R/3

Hi,
While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
Kindly, reply me.
Regards,
dinesh.

>
Dinesh Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
>
> I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
>
> /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
>
> Kindly, reply me.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> dinesh.
did you import the BAPI?
Your receiver system will be the SAP BS. when you use the f4 help option for the interface it will list the BAPI and u can select it

Similar Messages

Enhanced Receiver determination - for Integration Process

Hi,
Just wanted to confirm that if it is possible to have more than one Receivers, with Enhanced Receiver Determination and one of the Receiver happens to be Integration Process. I know with Enhanced Receiver Determinations you can find more than one Receivers at Run time, however the key question is, if in addition to normal Receiver Systems (like SAP R/3 or Web Services etc), if we can also kickoff Integration Process within Enhanced Receiver Determination.
Thanking in advance.

as said by Udo Martens
Assumedly the different receivers are using different Inbound Interfaces (a BP is using an Abstract Interface). Therefore you would need for each different receiver a own Interface Determination referring a own mapping.
refer this wiki http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/pointstab/viewpageversion.action?pageId=131760630&version=5 to Know how to configure Enhanced receiver determination and Interface determination for each receiver .
In your case one of the receiver will be Integration process

Receiver Agreement for Integration Process

Dear All
I am facing a strange problem when I am sending a message via proxy to SAP PI whci is then supposed to forward it to a legacy system.
I am using a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process

Hi,
>>>a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process
use the integration directory wizard and create two configurations
- ECC - PI (integration process)
- PI (BPM) - to the legacy
then it will work - this is not an error but lack of configuration
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk

Enhanced Receiver Determination for synchronous interface.

Hello!
Was anyone faced with the Enhanced Receiver Determination? When I try to create
the definition of the Interface Mapping, I get the error:
"Interface modi are different. Source interface Message Interface MI_My_sync_iface | urn:my is synchronous. Target interface Message Interface ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous"
Thank you.

Hi ,
U can go through below limks :
Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios
Enhanced Receiver Determination in SAP XI - Exchange Infrastructure - Wiki
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/enhanced%2breceiver%2bdetermination%2bin%2bsap%2bxi
Thanks

Unable to clone File Adapter receiver channel for parallel processing

Hi Experts,
I am using variable substitution for File - RFC - File with out BPM scenario(using request response, oneway bean).
While i placed the file in the sender FTP folder, the file didnt get picked up, but in communication channel monitoring, i am getting error ' Unable to clone File Adapter receiver channel for parallel processing'.
Can anybody provide me suggestions to solve this error.
Note : without variable substitution , the interface is working good.
Is it due to, i am trying the source structure field in response file adapter?

Hi,
In your CC, do you use some additional paramaters ?
like these one of point 47/48 of [Oss note 821267 - FAQ: XI 3.0 / PI 7.0/ PI 7.1 File Adapter|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/821267]
Maybe there is conflict with a parallel connexion and the bean used to do asynch-synch bridge...
Mickael

Dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface

Hello everybody,
I want to use dynamic receiver determination for a synchron scenario.
The problem is, that the interface 'ReceiverDetermination' (http://sap.com/xi/XI/System SAP BASIS 7.00) is a asynchron interface.
This leads to an error when activating the Interface-Mapping (synch source Interface -> asynch destination Interface ReceiverDetermination)
Is there a way to use the dynamic receiver determination for synchron interface?
Thanks a lot,
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
I guess your scenario is not possible ASIS, since XI doesn't support 1:n for sync interfaces (and even if your mapping condition reduces it to 1:1, actually it is still 1:n, since your receiver list is unbounded).
Theoretically, you could make it work with BPM, though.
But I've never worked with a Receiver Determination Step reading from an enhanced receiver determination in ID (though there should be no problems).
Use sync async bridge, then use receiver determination step to obtain the receiver from an enhanced Receiver Determination. Pay attention that this enhanced receiver determination is a dummy one, using a mapping from your async abstract interface to the ReceiverDetermination interface. Once your mapping has determined the receiver, the enhanced receiver determination will return that receiver to the Receiver Determination step in the BPM. Then use this receiver in the sync send step (in mode receiver from receiver list, not from context).
The receiver determination of the actual sync send step may be a standard one, with the several receivers there (even if there are several there, at the moment of the sending, only one will be used).
Maybe it will work, maybe not.
Just try it.
Regards,
Henrique.

Adapter Specific Paramters for Integration Process in Configuration

I want to send the data from flat file to idoc through BPM
While doing configuration do I need to explicitly give Adapter specific parameters(Logical System Name) for BPM(Integration Process) or not?
Is it mandatory to give Adapter Specific Parameters for this scenario?
FILE-->BPM--->IDOC(R/3)
Thanks & Regards
Katta Mohan Reddy

Hi,
why would you require Adapter specific parameters (I assume you mean Adapter specific Attributes) - Logical System should be there through the routing (Receiver Determination). What exactly do you want to accomplish by that?
regards,
Peter

How to configure Integration Directory for Integration process async sync

Hi Experts,
I am confused about doing configuration in Integration Directory i.e receiver determination,interface determination and receiver agreement and sender agreement for my integration process as it involve synchronous send at target side.
In my Scenario , we get Purchase order request(asynchronously) from SRM system in proxy xml format which we have to map to Cxml format send it to third party system(say system 2) as http request.Then we will recieve a response from system2 in Cxml format through HTTP.Now,we have to map this response as to SRM system via proxy code for successful and error case .If error occured we also have to mail to the respective department about the error occured via mail adapter.Proxy to XI is a asynchronous communication and XI to System2 is a synchronous communication .Then again XI to SRM is a asynchronous communication via proxy.I have request and response External defination for Cxml i.e HTTP side.
I have done following integration process in ESR
Start- Receive(1)---Transformation(2)-send(3)-Fork(4)--
stop
...................................................................................................... .....[----Branch 1 [-Transformation(5)-Send(6)-
.......................[-----Branch 2 -
SWITCH STEP to check error code[
............................................................................................................[.otherwise branch of switch
Fork(4)----[
.......................[----Branch 1-Transformation (9)-send(10)-
Here,
Recieve(1) -- is used for recieve request from SRM.Mode is asynchronous
Transforamtion(2)-- is used for operation mapping between request of SRM to HTTP request.
send(3) --is used to sending request synchronous to HTTP,mode is synchronous,used synchronous abstract interface,abstract reqhttp and abstract resphttp
switch-switch Branch1 is used for checking error response to be true---
Transformation(5)--- is used to map HTTP response to Mail response structure
Send(6)----
is used to send mail content to Mail adapter
Transformation(9)---- is used to map HTTP response to Proxy response
Send(10) --- used to send mapped proxy response to SRM as to update status by calling calling Function module using proxy code.
Thanks
Deepak

Deepak,
In BPM data does not flow in Backword direction!
take any step in your BPM the message it is goiong to receive will be what a step just before it is giving to BPM.
Now in your case
IR Part:
You have to call Third part Synchronously and the input to it will be what Proxy has given to you.
Create an Abstract Synchronous(in case of abstract you need not bother it is Inbound or Outbound) in which(I mean the Message Interface) The Output message will be what you have Received from Proxy and the input message will be what you are going to receive from the Third party as a Response. Now you would have Inbound Synchronous Interface created for calling Third party.
Have a Interface Mapping between the Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous Message Interface.
ID Part:
For synchronous Step: BPM will; be sender with Message Interface Abstarct Synchronous
Third Party will be receiver With Inbound Interface(Synchronous). Use the INterface Mapping between Abstract Synchronous and Inbound Synchronous that You have created in IR.
Have a Receiver Agreement for the Thirs part.
No Sender agreement required in case of BPM as a Sender.
Thanks,
Sunil Singh

Receiver Determination for differnet recordsets

hi
i 'm reading some files into the xi with the file adapter and content conversion. the result is a incoming message with some recordsets looking like this:
MY_MT
Record
    Row
      FieldA
      FieldB
    /Row
    Row
      FieldA
      FieldB
    /Row
/Record
/MY_MT
my data is in fieldA and a flag for the receiver in fieldB (fieldB = 1 then send row to receiver 1, fieldB = 2 -> receiver 2).
at configuration i created a receiver determination where i setup 2 different receiver services and then created a condition:
MY_MT/Record/Row/fieldB = 1 for receiver 1
MY_MT/Record/Row/fieldB = 2 for receiver 2
a message like below is send to both receivers, but i just want to send all Rows with fieldB = 1 to receiver 1.
MY_MT
Record
    Row
      DATA
      1
    /Row
    Row
      DATA
      2
    /Row
/Record
MY_MT
Is this possible?
greets
J.

Hi
As par current configuration settings, your choosing a reciver on the basis of flag.
But same input is given to both recivers.
What you want is hust separate the content based on flag.
Two options:
Conditional reciver:-
Use two different mapping program for the same.
In first mapping choose all DAta whose flag is one,
and in another mapping
Choose all the data whose flag is two.
and wonder you will get two different outputs depending on your flag.
Use multimapping:
Instead of going for two mapping programs, just go for single mapping program, and just go through the blog
/people/narendra.jain/blog/2005/12/30/various-multi-mappings-and-optimizing-their-implementation-in-integration-processes-bpm-in-xi
Go for message instance level mapping, It is easy and one time work.....
and wonder you will get output as
MY_MT
Record
Row
DATA
1
   /Row
/RecordMY_MT
MY_MT
Record
Row
DATA
2
/Row
/RecordMY_MT
Cheers
Regards
Piyush

Multiple Queue Assignment for Integration Process - PI 7.11

Hi,
I am trying to configure multiple Queues for an Integration Process.
The Integration Process is straight forward, except for a Asynchronous Request Response pattern with correlation. (A asynch send step - immediately followed by a asynchronous receive step with Correlation)
I have done the following
1) In IR set the Queue as Multiple - Content Specific
2) In SWF_INB_CONF transaction reconfigured Multiple Queues - Content Specific without buffering
But when I trigger the message, the message is not at all triggering/entering the Integration Process. The error message is BPE Internal Failure.
But if I reconfigure the IP as One Configurable Queue & "Without Buffering", it is working. But we want multiple queues assigned to this Process.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Bjoern, there are blogs/wikis available which should be searched before a question is asked on forum. The information you need is quite basic one and I will therefore lock this thread.
Regards,
Prateek

Receiver Determination Step in process (not in directory)

I get a little confused about the receiver determination step when i doing the process design
i have looked through the example:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/11/13283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm
1.does it mean that
when i get the ReceiverList, it will execute the process
according to the receivers in ReceiverList.
If the receivers is not in ReceiverList, the process will not send the message to these receivers
2.In the example, what is the "ResponseList" used for?
Thank you very much

>>>>> the Receivers step calls the receiver determination that you configured in ID and gets the list of receivers into the multiline container element 'receiver list'
so where to use the receiver list"? used in directory?
>>> which example ?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/11/13283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/content.htm

Logical System for Integration Process

I am getting a error message for my Integration Process: "Unable to convert sender service IP_Kleinschmidt_Shipments to an ALE logical system"
I am confused as to what i need to put in the IP -> Service -> Adapter Specific Identifires ->Logical System.
I won't let me enter either the R3 system nor the XI system.
What value do I need to put here so my acknoldgement can go back to the R3 system?

Use header mapping in receiver agreement to apply a business system as sender of the Idoc message.
That business system must have a logical system aplied and this should be maintained in R/3 as well.
if you use XI system as logical system as IDoc receiver in R/3, then you can apply also XI as sender here.
But you have to load the PI as business system to ID for this reason.
You cannot apply a logical system to the business system, which already used elsewhere.
I discused that issue with the developer a couple of years ago. He told me to use the workaround.

Using Xpath in Receiver Determination for greater than 500

Hi,
I am trying to use Xpath in the receiver Determination step and I want to check a field which is at item level and comes multiple times(0-unbounded) greater than 500.I tried with different options per SDN blogs,Xpath functions,but still I couldn't able to get what i am trying.I want to process the message when "quantity" is greater than 500,else I want to ignore the message with no errors.
I gave like this /p1: /LIST/item[quantity>499] EX
item loop is 0-unbounded and I need to check for every quantity.I selected the check box multi line as well.
I played around different options,but still did not get what I am looking for.
please suggest in this regard ,how I need to give the expression.
Thank you,
Sri

Hi,
For validating that the item field is occuring more than 500 times you need to choose the
2.The exact XPath would be in your case *(/p1: /LIST/itemquantity[499]EX)*
This means if the 500 th occurance of the item exists then the condition satisfies that is always true for 500 and above occurance of the item.
Please revert if the suggestion proves to be helpful.
cheers,
Abhishek.
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 10:55 PM
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 11:02 PM
Edited by: Abhishek Paul on May 6, 2010 11:08 PM

Receiver determination for ALEAUD??

Hi,
I have configured my ALEAUD for a (B2B partner) R3 -> PI (B2b) - > PI (local) - > R3 (local) scenario... I have requested the partner PI system to map their systems to my business systems in their Receiver determination step - header mapping.... But the reverse step of sending back AleAUD is falling in our partners system because of the changed business system names...
I am not able map the ALEAUD back to the original Business sytems used by the partners....Although I have created a receiver aggrement the std Aleaud does not pick it up.
I would like to avoid using the ALEAUD as a seperate message approach.
Regards,
Arvind R

Hi Arvind,
Refer this links. Hope it will help you.
Custom processing for ALEAUD01 messages ??
Re: XML Incoming Invoices - Send response to Vendor for Failed Messages in XI
Thanks.

Alternative for integration process ?

The XI integration process functionality for me looks like another example of overkill design in XI. Needs lots of additional abstract message interface declarations, difficult to follow what really happens.
Question: what alternatives in XI are possible without breaking the architecure completely ? E.g. when I have to perform some simple connected steps, like call an RFC, then load a file via FTP, then send out an email with the result data. Where in XI could I define a Java or ABAP method which does that programmatically ? The communication channels have some module processors. Would that be the right place ( define a module processor in channel which receives the trigger). Are there standard functions in XI available in Java or ABAP to perform RFC, FTP...
or is it better to do it in a Java or ABAP mapping ? This does not seem to make much sense.
Any experiences or ideas ?
CSY

hi,
the complete lauch of xi is to have common place for all designed interfaces and configuration and monitoring stuffs.
client b4r getting in to xi should read his landscape and justify whether to bring in xi r not, when this step is not done, questions as mentioned above would arise around
what is the need of xi for simple function which i can do by abap , java , jco s etc..(many ask ))
but beauty of xi is tapped when the landscape around it is growing and when u want to intergrate those all systems.
i guess it's better to have xi standard congf instead peeping in to other hindden programs to do same , as it would be easily visible to all developer who come in .
IP is the class idea and u shud think if u r flow has more logic in between to be manipulated.
In in the end the moral is that every system is capable of meeting the requirment we shud be in search of which can be trusted and maitained easily as a long run ) everything is possible.
rgds
srini
Edited by: Venkateswarlu Srinivas on Jul 9, 2008 3:19 PM

Receiver Determination for Integration Process - R/3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for