Receiver Determination Not Found

Hi all,
Currently we integrating SAP ECC with TM using PI ,we have followed the standard document given and done the configuration steps ,
"Installations and Upgrades - R" SAP Rapid Deployment solutions" SAP Transportation Planning for Shippers RDS" SAP TM DTP RDS" SAP TM DTP RDS V2.90",the reference document is from the above link.
ECC has triggered an workflow which is in format of XML ,but when we checked in SXMB_Moni,i am getting the below error.
Receiver Determination: No Receiver could be determined
2:26:30 PM
2:26:30 PM
SHDCLNT900
http://sap.com/xi/APPL/Global2
BusinessDocumentFlowTMInformationbyBusinessObjectReferenceQueryResponse_Out
CENTRAL
"Current Status"
Synchronous
BE
IENGINE
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
00000000000000000000000000000000
53EB863237550A10E10080000A1A016E
sender =>R/3 system
Receiver=>TM system .
Your help is badly needed

hi Hareesh,
please find the below screen shot of my ID objects ,we generated it using "Apply Model From ES repository".

Similar Messages

  • Receiver determination not found for one interface

    Hi,
    I am receiving the message via SOAP and then sending to SAP as IDOC.
    The communication is party o partyless communication.
    I have configured 2 receiver determination for the same sender and receiver but with 2 different interfaces.
    When i test the scenario via SOAP tool only one gets  executed and the second one neither throws an error nor getting executed.
    I think i have a error in the configuration that i did for the 2nd interface since i am using the 1st receiver determination which has been created already ?
    but in the Quick Test tool and Test tool in ID both the receiver determination is working fine.please provide the inputs
    Thanks in advance,
    Rgds,
    Vasanth.

    Hi All,
    Thanks for all of your replies.
    I have activated all the objects and checked it again once.
    As i said earlier the sender and receiver are same and that's why i have been pushed to create 2 receiver determinations for the same file(not IDOC as i said above) to be dropped in to two different locations.
    Also the configuration is party in sender to partyless in receiver.
    To give a clear explantion:
    All the objetcs are activated and works fine when i test in the test tool in ID by specifying the inetrface and namespace.
    Sender1 - Int1 - sap1.com - SA - RD - ID - RA -Receiver1  = working fine when tested by ID test tool
    Sender1 - Int2 - sap2.com -SA- RD - ID - RA Receiver2  = working fine  when tested by ID test tool
    RD = Receiver determination / SA = Sender Agreement
    It is not working when i send the same file thru SOAP client tool and only one receiver determination is working and another is not.
    Any idea ?
    Thanks,
    RGds,
    Vasanth.
    Message was edited by:
            Vasanthakumar Balasubramani
    Message was edited by:
            Vasanthakumar Balasubramani

  • Receiver Determination Not found   Internal Error...Please help me

    Hi Gurus..
    I have done a file to File scenario and when i test my scenario i am getting this error
    Receiver Determination
     Internal Error
    HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden URL: http://sapserver:8001/sap/xi/simulation?sap-client= User: PIDIRUSER
    So please please help to solve this problem.

    Hello,
    Seems that you should configure the RFC Destinations and also
    maintain the correct password, which should be the SAME, for all
    the service users.
    Refer to note below according to your system version:
    PI 7.1:
    #999962 - PI 7.10: Change passwords of PI service users
    XI 7.0
    #936093 - XI 7.0: Changing the passwords of XI service users
    XI 3.0
    #721548 - XI 3.0: Changing the passwords of the XI service users
    Regards,
    Caio Cagnani

  • Interface determination not found

    Hi,
    I am reading a file and trying to send it through a SOAP adapter.
    I am getting the below error
    Error when determining the inbound interface: No interface determination found for outbound interface http://test.com.testFlies_OB: Error while determining root tag of XML: BOM / charset detection failed
    No interface determination found for outbound interface http://test.com.testFlies_OB: Error while determining root tag of XML: BOM / charset detection failed
    Error while determining root tag of XML: BOM / charset detection failed
    Error while parsing an XML stream: 'BOM / charset detection failed&#39
    Need help.

    Hi,
    just check in ID, whether in receiver determination, you have specified interface determination.........if yes, then check whether it is activated or not............if not activated, then activate it...........
    if it is activated and still you get this error, then ask your basis guys to do a full CPACache refresh using XIDIRUSER..........then re-run your scenario.
    Regards,
    Rajeev Gupta

  • Receiving command not found after modifying .bash_profile in OEL 5.6 64 bits

    Hi guys,
    After the installation of Oracle Database 11gR2 on OEL 5.6, I added the following entries into the .bash_profile of the oracle user:
    # Oracle Settings
    TMP=/tmp; export TMP
    TMPDIR=$TMP; export TMPDIR
    ORACLE_HOSTNAME=ol5-112.localdomain; export ORACLE_HOSTNAME
    ORACLE_UNQNAME=DB11G; export ORACLE_UNQNAME
    ORACLE_BASE=/u01/app/oracle; export ORACLE_BASE
    ORACLE_HOME=$ORACLE_BASE/product/11.2.0/db_1; export ORACLE_HOME
    ORACLE_SID=DB11G; export ORACLE_SID
    PATH=/usr/sbin:$PATH; export PATH
    PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/bin:$PATH; export PATH
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/lib:/lib:/usr/lib; export LD_LIBRARY_PATH
    CLASSPATH=$ORACLE_HOME/jlib:$ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/jlib; export CLASSPATH
    # I added my own values relative to my environment.
    But now, when I tried to login as the oracle user on my terminal, I received the following error:
    command not found
    command not found
    So I deleted all the entries I added to the .bash_profile file. But it didn't solve the problem. When I log in as oracle, I still receive the error:
    command not found
    command not found
    This is really weird. How can I do to solve this error?
    Thanks in advance
    Clamarion.

    The following command might show you where the problem is:
    bash -l -x
    See "man bash" for details.

  • Error : Receiver agreement not found

    Hi all,
    My scenario is RFC to JDBC.
    Its showing the below error, when 'I try to send data through test configuration after configuring ESR and ID part.
    Receiver Agreement
    Runtime error
    Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -SAP_BL_ISU to receiver -RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1: No standard agreement found for , SAP_BL_ISU, , RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest, urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions, ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1
    <Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T">-SAP_BL_ISU </Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T">-RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest </Trace>
    <Trace level="2" type="T">urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1 </Trace>
    <Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace>
    <Trace level="1" type="T">No standard agreement found for , SAP_BL_ISU, , RFC_To_JDBC_Async_R_SQL_bllmstest, urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions, ZTEST_TIPS_DOI1 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
    please suggest me...

    Hi,
    This is configuration issue, please check the ESR sender/Receiver interfaces and the associated
    Sender / Receiver agreement and the associated communication channels are configured correctly.
    Try to test the configuration using Test configuration / send a test message from RWB to this interface.
    If the configuration is correct and you are facing the same issue. try to delete the ID configuration and recreate it.
    Before re-creating the configuration, do cache refresh.
    Regards
    Bhargava Krishna

  • XI Idoc Receiver Port Not Found

    Hi there
    I have a Idoc Scenario where the Idoc is a receiver adapter going into some Sap System. I have setup the scenario and it gets processed correctly but the Idoc has got a status 56. Everything seems fine but in WE02, if I view the idoc under Technical Info, the Port there is different from what I have specified in the message mapping. Where does that port get specify if not in XI?
    Thanx,
    Jan

    Hi Jan,
    have a look at my blog
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/01/xi-idoc-adapter--edidc40--demystified
    to understand which values from the control record you can control
    and how
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Q? Receiver determination error ????

    Hi all.
    I wana transfer from R3 IDOC to XML with FTP service.
    Although I think configuration completely was finished, happens error.
    How can i correct?
    It's results from test configuration.
        Receiver Determination  <Not found>
           Internal Error
           HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed.
           Error: 403 Forbidden
           URL: http://R3:8000/sap/xi/simulation?sap-client=
           User: XIDIRUSER Check
    =======================================================
    Scenario : R3 IDOC -> FTP XML (import Ext Definition DTD)
    1) create Business Service System     : R3, FTP
    2) create Message Interface about FTP : MI_FTP_in
    3) create Interface Mapping R3 & FTP  : IM_R3_to_FTP
    4) import business system about FTP server : FTP
    5) create Receiver Determination : |R3|IDOC_inf
         sender : R3
               - interface : IDOC interface
         configured Receivers
               - Service   : FTP
               - Receiver  : FTP
               - interface : MI_FTP_in
               - Mapping   : IM_R3_to_FTP
               - Receiver Agreement: FTP_file_adapter
    6) create Interface Determination: |R3|IDOC_inf||FTP
         Sender   : R3
               - interface : IDOC interface
         receiver : FTP
         Configured Inbound Interface
               - Inbound interface  : MI_FTP_in
               - interface Mapping  : IM_R3_to_FTP
    7) create Receiver  Agreement : |R3|IDOC_inf|MI_FTP_in
         Sender   : R3
         Receiver : FTP
               - interface : MI_FTP_in
               - Receiver Channel : FTP_File_Adapter
    ========================================================

    Hi,
      Please can you check you Cache is updated or not.If cache is succesfull then check the Port & RFC Destination and Partner profiles  R/3 side and XI side.
    R u testing this scenario using WE19.
    If using we 19 then check the your sender information and receiver information (I mean to say Port,Parner...with outbound parameters )
    Regards,
    Venu.

  • Reciever determiantion not found

    Hi
    We installed PI 7.3 but not able to find receiver determination,interface determination and sender and receiver agreements.
    but integrated configuration is present
    I think only AAE is installed and IE is missing . Please let me know how to check that and correct it.
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi,
    Is this an error "Receiver determination not found"? If so, where are you seeing that? SXMB_MONI messages?
    Have you tried performing a cache refresh?
    Regards,
    Caio Cagnani

  • Message Interface not found during Receiver determination

    Hi Folks,
    While doing Receiver determination i found this error
    “Problem Loading Schema Description: Message interface does not exist in any software components installed on this business system”
    i checked it in SLD also for Product assigned to Particular Business System. Even i tried with creating a new one and assigning the product and software component to it.
    When i imported the Business system from SLD, i m not able to see any inbound and outbound interface for particular business system.
    But it is working for another scenario where inbound interfaces are used.
    plz help me out
    Sachin

    Sachin,
    ><i>DEV and QA is having diff. SLD so i created the SWC and products in SLD again.</i>
    You should export the SWCV from your Old SLD and import in into your new SLD.
    and then import the same in Integration Respository.
    When you try to export SWCV from SLD, you will get a .CIM file which you need to save in your local desktop and then import this in the new environment.
    More in this article,
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e76e511-0d01-0010-5c9d-9f768d644808
    Regards
    Bhavesh

  • Receiver Determination and Interface Determination Condition conflict in ICO

    Hi,
    I found a strange issue today while configuring two receivers using the Receiver and Interface Determination conditions.
    Sender - Proxy Service
    Receiver1 - ReceiverA
    Receiver2 - ReceiverB
    Receiver Determination Condition : When Field1 = 100, message should flow to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
    Interface Determination Condition (ReceiverA) : When Field1=100 and Field2=50 message should flow to a specific interface in ReceiverA
    There is no Interface Determination condition for ReceiverB, for all messages having Field1=100, it should go to ReceiverB.
    Test Scenarios:
    1) Field1=100, Field2=50 : Message flows successfully to ReceiverA and ReceiverB
    2) Field1=100, Field2=89 : Message fails to process from ECC itself throwing Interface Determination not found error. Ideally this is a positive scenario for ReceiverB and it should send the message to ReceiverB without any errors. But, this did not happen in this case
    I tried the same by configuring the conditions completely in Receiver Determination itself without using the Interface Determination, it worked perfectly fine. But, just wanted to understand that if this is an expected behavior.

    Hi Sherin,
    As there are two receivers Receiver A and Receiver B.You need to create two bussiness components and two communcication channels for two receivers and one Reciver Determination, two Interface Determination,two Receiver Agreement.In Receiver Determination you need to keep the below and condition.
    In the above screenshot the two receiver are Receiver B and Receiver C and Field 1 is Key_Value and Field2 is Emp_ID.
    If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID =22 then the message should go to both the receivers B & C by keeping the following AND condition
    If the Key_Value=100 and Emp_ID is not equal to 22 then the message should go only to Receiver B by keeping the following condition
    You need not keep any condition in Interface Determination just create 2 Interface determination for two receivers.
    Hope this helps you.
    Thanks,
    Durga.

  • Configuration Scenario Builder - Receiver Determination Problem.

    Hi  I am Follows  configurates Integration Scenario to SRM-SUS scenario in XI
    In Model Configuration.  when I try create Object Bottom in Simulation Process .  generate the report show the next message for
    Component View Connection
    Receiver Determination light yellow color  SRD_009 | PurchaseOrderRequest_out
    Analisys ; Requiered Communication Component | SRD_009
                    a receiver determination was found for connection
                    Reciever are missing in the receiver determination found
    Results ;  the reuse receiver determination is already assigned to the configuration scenario
                   the missing receivers were inserted into receiver determination found
                   added receiver communication component SRD_008
    Notes;      Check the conditions for all receivers of the receiver determination. the default result value for the generated condition
                    is TRUE:
    thanks.

    Hi,
    Please verify letter by letter if you haven't make a typo here:
    Default Interface Namespace -- http://mtf
    Default Interface Name -- mtf_mi1
    please also make a test of your scenario in integration directory
    please also do not use best efort quality of service
    /wg
    Message was edited by:
            Wojciech Gasiorowski

  • CNA 6 InstallShield Wizard will not install with a JVM not found message

    I ran CNA 5.5 up until last week when Java 7 71 update hit. When I tried to launch, I received JVM Not Found, that was all. So I figured it was time to install CNA 6, however during the install process I now get a pop up box stating  InstallShield Wizard will not install with a JVM not found message. No other error messages, no logs, and the installation ceases. Tried installing CNA 5.8.9.1, and CNA 5.5 again, all stop at the same point with the same message. Anyone else see this issue?

    When you start Network Assistant, Java determines whether the resources it needs are available. If they are not, Java displays the message Could not create Java Virtual machine, and the session ends. To overcome this problem, open the file C:\Program Files\Cisco Systems\CiscoSMB\Cisco Network Assistant\startup\startup.properties (the default installation path), and modify this entry:
    JVM_MAXIMUM_HEAP=1024m
    Replace 1024m with a lower setting that does not exceed the available RAM. There is no way to foresee what value will work. Try 512m , and lower it further if necessary. You can use the dial peer tag range 2500 to 2999 out-of-band to define your own dial peers.
    If the Network Assistant InstallShield wizard fails to start, it is likely that the temporary folder location defined through the environment variables TMP and TEMP has some problem. Assigning a correct temporary folder location can fix such problems.
    Source:  http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/net_mgmt/cisco_network_assistant/version6/relnotes/ol32368.html#pgfId-840748

  • Is multiple receiver determination possible in a  Sync scenario

    Hi I have a scenario - Syncronous interface -> RFC to JDBC. There are two target databases. based on the one of the input fields in the source message I have to route the database call to one of the two databases.
    When i put the condition (which is mutually exclusive - one onlt receiver is always selected at a time) in the receiver determinationand executed the interface I got a message saying sync messages cannot have multiple receivers ... even though the condition was such that only BSwould have been selected..
    Is there some work around for this?
    regards,
    Arvind R

    Hey
    As far as i know, its not possible to have multiple Syn receivers with regular Receiver Determination.
    You can try 2 options:
    1. Try using "Extended Receiver determination" instead of regular Receiver determination, not sure if it will work but worth a try.
    2. Use BPM as given in below help.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/11/13283fd0ca8443e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    Thanks
    Aamir

  • Purpose of Enhanced Receiver Determination

    Hi
       i go thrown  the some sap help link  .. But I did't understand.. so, can  any of you plz explain the what is the purpose of the  Enhanced Receiver determination..
    for this.. in mapping side does we need to do any special  things.. or for a normal  scenario also.. can we use this..
    I want to use this   Enhanced  Recever determination in  my scenario.. for that what are the steps  i need to  follow..
    Regards
    Babu

    Hi !
    Enhanced Receiver Determination:
    You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    also check this
    Please Check
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    Also check ....
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm -
    >Enhanced Interface determination.
    /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination --->Customised XPath
    Also check the following threads
    Enhanced Receiver Determination
    Enhanced Receiver Determination synchronous
    /people/robin.schroeder/blog/2006/11/15/using-dynamic-receiver-determination-with-sync-interface
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    List of receivers can be dyamically determined and assigned at runtime using enhanced receiver determination .
    have alook at thses URl's also
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/01322a7af25285e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    :Dynamic file and variable substitution
    Similarly Extended Receiver determination is used to determine the receiver at runtime.
    Refer my reply:Re: Condition In Receiver Determination Not Working
    enhancement in ID
    Enhanced Receiver Determination:
    You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    Enhanced (Mapping-Based) Interface Determination
    In an enhanced interface determination you do not enter the inbound interfaces manually, but instead first select a multi-mapping. You get the inbound interfaces from the target interfaces of the multi-mapping. The inbound interfaces are determined at runtime during the mapping step.
    You typically use an enhanced interface determination if the source message has an element with occurrence 0 ... unbounded (for multiple items of a data record) and you want multiple messages (for the individual items) to be generated at runtime.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    Thanks

Maybe you are looking for

  • Quantity in A/R Credit Memo

    Hello all, i can create an A/R Invoice  with Quantity 0 and just the price. but if i want to create the same as A/R Credit Note this don't work (zero quantity is not allowed). For the Purchasing side this also don't work for Invoice and Credit Note i

  • I plugged my ipod in, and it is not being recognized in itunes, on the list on the left side. what do i do

    i plugged my ipod in, and it is not being recognized in itunes, on the list on the left side. what do i do

  • Can't create a folder without being asked for a login password.

    I'm running 10.9.5 on an iMac. When I try to create a folder I'm asked for my login password. When I try to move a file into the folder I'm asked again for my login password. This is very annoying. My other Mac running 10.4.8 doesn't do this.

  • Director and PowerPoint

    I am more than happy to buy a third-party product if necessary for this. My objective is to call a PowerPoint presentation from within Director and then after the PowerPoint finishes to return to my Director presentation. If someone is a maven on thi

  • Custom transformation does not run against Logical Model

    Here is the screen [http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/7411/20110530174314002.jpg|http://img849.imageshack.us/img849/7411/20110530174314002.jpg] Besides setting the object=logical, the script ran against the relational model. To prove this, have a sc