Recommendation for maintaining pricing in CRM when R/3 is also in landscape

Hi,
in out context we have already SAP R/3 in the landscape, all the pricing in done in R/3. lot of custom pricing routines are also written in r/3.
now we in the process of implementing CRM and plan to do Quotations in CRM and replicate in SAP R/3 . what is the recommendation for such a scenario.
do we replicate all pricing conditions/procedures in CRM? do we need to re-do all procedures in IPC?
can we re-determine pricing in R/3 so that we can avoid such work in CRM? we are using configurable products in R/3.
please share your thoughts/best practices and any document will be of help.
thanks
RH

Hi Swaroop,
The Assignment of Buisness Partner classification from CRM to R3 is purely based on Classification
so your initial Entry
I chose B as classification & Z001 as an account group which is a copy of 0001. System takes it.
was taken by the system
now when you tried to make another Entry by the same Classification
chose B again & this time Z002 acc gp (copy of 0002), and system does not allow?
it checks for the Existing Classification and so does not allow the same
Delete the Previous Entry and then Try Entering the New Entry
The System shall Take it
Hope it Answered your Queries...
Revert Back for any Doubts..
Also Chk the Link for details:http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/04/4d9ac77b2b11d3b52f006094b9114a/content.htm
Thanks and Regards,
RK.

Similar Messages

Recommendations for keeping my mbp cool when using it my lap?

My mbp does fine when I used it on a hard surface (desk), but I frequently use it on a soft surface, like my lap, for extended periods of time and it can get quite hot, as the soft surface prevents it from getting the necessary airflow to keep it cooled down. Does anyone have any recommendations for a slim, lightweight cooling pad for use on softer surfaces?

Any cooling pad that connects to a usb port should do. If you order one from online, buy the one that has the highest number of positive reviews that fits your budget.

Recommendations for reasonably priced Time Machine back ups on my iMac?

For example, will the SanDisk Cruzer Fit CZ33 (64gb) USB work? Can you recommend an alternative if not? Some of the options for sale in the Apple store are really expensive, and overkill for the amount of info to be back up on my computer....
Thank you!

A Time Machine backup drive should be at least twice the capacity of your computer's hard drive. I doubt a flash drive will suffice. Check out OWC for some reasonably priced external hard drives.

Recommendation for a new feature - alert when an important email arrives

Why can't I set my iPhone to give me an alert when an important email arrives? This new feature would alert me when I get an email from a predetermined sender or subject line. AOL offers this feature. Why can't my iPhone do it too? The phone would need to read the sender address and subject line of each email, and then bounce it against a list of pre-configured alerts that the user programs.
This would also cut down on data consumption, since users would not have to check and recheck their mail when waiting for somethign important. With an alert, you just set it and forget it.

iOS 6, coming this fall, will include a new feature that allows you to designate a VIP list for just this purpose. This feature will be supported on the iPhone 4. See "Mail" here: http://www.apple.com/ios/ios6/.

Guideline Performance Initial Download from SAP for Utility into SAP CRM

Hello,
Please find below a link (valid for 10 weeks) to the document Guideline Performance Initial Download from SAP for Utilities into SAP CRM. The document is also published in the SAP Service Market Place at http://service.sap.com/utilities. Then choose Technical Information Center - Migration.
The purpose of the document is to give guidelines as well as to share experience for an efficient and high performance execution of an initial download from an SAP for Utilities system to an SAP CRM system, such as:
- Configuration of the initial download
- Ensure optimum performance for the initial download of the relevant business objects
- Avoid unnecessary business data being downloaded
- Monitoring of the initial download and taking corrective actions in case of problems
- Handle errors occurring during the initial download of business objects
- Minimize performance bottlenecks
The document explains the setup and configuration of the SAP for Utilities and SAP CRM systems only if necessary for the understanding of the solution of a described performance problem. This document does not cover the performance optimization of the delta down- and upload and the synchronization download.
The document has the following structure:
Chapter 1 describes the basics of an initial download
Chapter 2 describes how to plan and execute tests to achieve an acceptable performance
Chapter 3 describes the most important technical activities to prepare the involved systems
Chapter 4 describes the most important functional activities to prepare the involved system
Chapter 5 describes how to perform an initial download
Chapter 6 describes measures to improve the performance of an initial download
Chapter 7 provides a list of important repository tables
Chapter 8 contains a list of important SAP Notes related to initial download
I'd highly appreciate your valuable feedback on this document.
Kind regards,
Fritz
Edited by: William Eastman on Feb 17, 2011 2:34 PM

Hi Fritz,
sorry for the late late reply but I didn't notice your answer.
Here are my answers:
(1) I monitored the behaviour on the CRM system, CRM 7.0, SP5
(2) The change should be implemented in the CRM system
(3) Deactivate buffering for scenarios marketing, sale and service via SM30 and table T770MATTR.
By doing this the initial load of 3.2 million business agreements took around 2 hours, with activated scenario buffering I was at least ten times slower.
After the initial load you have to activate the buffering again.
Interesting to know would be why the scenario buffering only affects the initial load of business agreements and no other object. As far as I know the scenario buffering is relevant for the organizational management.
Regards
Alexander

Error :Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice

Hi
i have maintained excise data for material, after that i have created scheduled agreement with lp and with 0 value private and dummy tax code and delivery schedule is released. Now when i do the goods receipt i am getting error " Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date
Message no. 8I629" can some body can help me.
with regards
Narendra kumar

Hi,
goto tcode fv11 u have to maintained the condition.
first enter the condition type like jmop -
then enter, next screen u have the select the below comination.
select the plant/vendor/material base u have to maintain the conditions.
Thank's
MVS

Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date

When I am doing MIGO (Release GR Blocked Stock-movement type) t)he system is giving an error "Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date"I am attaching screen shot for reference.
I request if any one can provide me the solution

Hi,
Check did you have entry of that movement type in the following path where you specify which movement type relating to goods receipts involve excise invoices
SPRO -
> Logistics general -> tax on Goods Movements-> India -> Business Transactions--> Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoices
Regards,
Biju K

Preventing re-pricing in CRM for document created in MSA

Hi All,
I am trying to prevent a document (specifically a quotation) that was created in MSA being re-priced in CRM as we have differences in the pricing, specifically user exits for field catalogs which result in errors in the pricing if it is redone in CRM.
As I understand this, you should be able to control this by implementing the BADI CRM_30A_USER_EXITS Method USER_EXIT_UPLOAD_SALESDOC and set the Pricing parameter to 'A' in structure BAD_BUS_TRANSN_MESSAGE-ACTIVE_SWITCH.
However, even after implementing the code below, pricing is still re-determined in CRM, if I look at the mBDOC in TR SMW01 the entries that I wrote into the ACTIVE_SWITCH table in the BADI are not present.
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated, I've been tearing my hair out for a day and this is a major problem on our project.
Many thanks
Jason
Data declarations
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_sdgen_object> TYPE /1crmg0/sdgen_object01,
                 <fs_active_switch> TYPE bad_active_switch_mess.
DATA: lt_fields_active TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF smog_sfldn,
        wa_fields_active TYPE smog_sfldn,
        lt_ddfields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF dfies,
        wa_ddfields TYPE dfies,
        lv_sfavbak TYPE smo_sfavbk,
        lv_auart TYPE smo3auart,
        lv_sendbits TYPE smog_sinc-sendbits.
CONSTANTS: lc_active_struct TYPE smog_sname VALUE 'BAD_ACTIVE_SWITCH_MESS'.
Get the order details
LOOP AT salesdocgen_write-sdgen_object[] ASSIGNING <fs_sdgen_object>.
    lv_sfavbak = <fs_sdgen_object>-sfavbak.
    lv_auart = <fs_sdgen_object>-auart.
ENDLOOP.
Check the order is relavant for pricing - THIS SHOULD BE CHANGED TO A CONFIG TABLE
CHECK lv_auart = 'ZD01' OR lv_auart = 'ZD02'.
Get the active switch details
LOOP AT bus_trans_msg-active_switch[] ASSIGNING <fs_active_switch>.
Get the table structure
    CALL FUNCTION 'DDIF_NAMETAB_GET'
      EXPORTING
        tabname   = lc_active_struct
      TABLES
        dfies_tab = lt_ddfields
      EXCEPTIONS
        not_found = 1
        OTHERS    = 2.
    LOOP AT lt_ddfields INTO wa_ddfields.
      CLEAR wa_fields_active.
      wa_fields_active-fieldname = wa_ddfields-fieldname.
      wa_fields_active-position = wa_ddfields-position.
      INSERT wa_fields_active INTO TABLE lt_fields_active.
    ENDLOOP.
Fill Sendbits
    CALL FUNCTION 'SMO_SNDBITS_SETX'
      EXPORTING
        structurename       = lc_active_struct
      TABLES
        sfields             = lt_fields_active
      CHANGING
        sndbits             = lv_sendbits
      EXCEPTIONS
        structure_not_found = 1
        wrong_fieldname     = 2
        OTHERS              = 3.
    CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
Switch off the pricing
    <fs_active_switch>-sendbits = lv_sendbits BIT-OR <fs_active_switch>-sendbits.
    <fs_active_switch>-ref_guid = lv_sfavbak.
    <fs_active_switch>-pricing = 'A'.
    <fs_active_switch>-task = '2'.
   MODIFY bus_trans_msg-active_switch FROM <fs_active_switch>.
    APPEND <fs_active_switch> TO bus_trans_msg-active_switch.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.

Hi,
I am quite sure that there is no need to do this in some BADI but on customizing level itself (depending on process type or pricing determination), at least for 4.0.
Regards,
Wolfhard

When we clicked on Update for new pricing,condition type is repeated twice

Hi Friends,
For new pricing,I clicked on the Update pushbuttion in the conditions tab of sales order,Condition type is repeated twice .So value is increased.I checked in the pricing analysis,it is showing only once.
I searched all threads and I tried all the possibilities.
I checked exclusive indicator,it is correctly checked.
Condition type manual entries selected as B automatic as priority
Item condition check box is checked only.
Mandatory check box is selected in the Pricing procedure for that condition type.
Anything i missed out .
Please suggest me how to go.
Thanks in advance.
Rgds....VM
Edited by: vm on Nov 2, 2011 5:55 PM
Edited by: vm on Nov 2, 2011 5:56 PM

Condition type is repeated twice
Ensure that the pricing condition is not maintained for multiple combinations in VK11
G. Lakshmipathi

I get a notice that says a security and stability update is recommended for Fire Fox 3.6.15. When I click to update a bar appears showing attempt to contact but nothing ever updates.

I get a notice that says a security and stability update is recommended for Fire Fox 3.6.15. When I click to update a bar appears showing attempt to contact but nothing ever updates.

Sometimes the updater gets in a funny state - Go to http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/ and download the full installer. Close Firefox and run the installer

Log Sizing recommendation for DB6 / SAP CRM

HI
Can anyone have Tran Log sizing recommendation for DB2 for Unix ( DB6 ) to be used in SAP CRM 7.0 ?
Thanks
Kirubakaran

Hi Kirubakaran,
please have a look here
1086130 DB6: DB2 9.5 Standard Parameter Settings
or
1329179 DB6: DB2 9.7 Standard Parameter Settings
BR,
Andreas

Duplicate Check Function in CRM when creating new BPs?

Hi
Three questions:
1. does anyone know if there is some standard way in CRM (we are on CRM5.0) to enable a duplicate check to happen when a new business partner is created - one that will warn that a similar BP already exists when the user goes to save (or even better, when part way through creation)? I have already looked into using the data cleansing cases in CRM, which is ok for existing duplicate records, but doesn't help with stopping them being created in the first place.
2. Is there a standard function/report available that will go through the database and identify any potential duplicate records? Or, does anyone know of some standard function calls/bapis etc that can be used by our developers to design something to do this for us?
3. Failing the above two, are there any recommendations out there for 3rd party add-ins for address/duplicate checks?
Any insight would be most gratefully received!
Regards
Cara

Hi Cara
SAP Business Address Services (BAS) is used for maintaining BP address data.
You can maintain any number of addresses for each business partner. One address per business partner is always flagged as being the standard address. You can define address usages by assigning the different addresses to the relevant business processes.
Postal data and information on different communication types, such as phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail, can be assigned to the address. If you have only the name and the (mobile) phone number of a business partner but you donu2019t know the address, you can create a BP with this address-independent communication data.
Now Answer to your question
A postal validation for the postal code, the city and the street can be carried out by checking against the SAP Regional Structure. You can also use external software for postal validation, checks for duplicates, and error-tolerant searches. (For more information, please see SAP Note 176559.)
The following are examples of possible checks:
Postal codes, cities and streets, and combinations of all of them are checked for consistency. During the check, missing elements are added. For example, if you enter only the city, the postal code is added.
When you create and change a business partner, several phonetically similar, existing BPs are proposed for comparison purposes.
This prevents you from creating the same partner more than once.
Please let me know if this answered your questions.
Regards
Dinesh

Not able to select sales area for reference BP in CRM system

Hi All
I am not able to select sales area data for the reference customer copied from r/3 to crm sysytem even through ORg. structure is properly maintain ( Object permitted in determination is ticked).
The field " Choose sale area is subpress/grey.
Please help me for the same.

Hi Kishore,
So you manage get into Sales Area Data, but when you
try to select Sales Organization you get nothing?
(click Sales Org combo but no selection appear)?
How about field Distribution Channel and Division?
I am afraid some of these fields still not properly
set/transported to CRM.
In R/3, this BP has maintained under same Sales Area
which mapped in CRM Org Model right ?
What is role in CRM when you open the BP?
Have you check if there is any error in middleware
when downloading BP data to CRM?
Cheers,
Gun.

Pricing table for Material pricing Group

Hi everyone
I have a problem related to pricing. In ECC, if we create a condition table for material pricing group, assign it to the Access sequence PR00 and then download the customizing data to CRM, the access sequence appears in CRM but without this table.
Could you please provide any clue to this??
Also, I had created another table with the Material/Material Prc Grp, assigned it to another Z-Access sequence and assigned the access seq to a Condition type. Again I had downloaded the customizing and in this case, only the Condition type has arrived. Neither the access sequence nor the table has come.
Could you please guide me as to what needs to be done??
Please help!!
Regards
Debolina

Hello,
Please check your replication object e.g. DNL_CUST_CNDALL and see if you have filters defined there.
You might have put filters which are preventing the download.
Also, you have to define the new field mappings in CRM before you download the tables.
V_CND_MAP_CNVFLD (transaction SM30).: This view contains the mapping between R/3 data structure (maintained in CND_MAPT_ACS_REM_CUST) to CRM data structure (Field Catalog).
The relationship between R/3 field names and CRM field names must be defined in either CND_MAPC_CNV_FLM or CND_MAPM_CNV_FLM
Let me know if still issues.
Koshal

Authorizations for Opportunity searches in CRM/EP?

Need help restricting user results in Opportunity searches.
Our authorizations scheme defines users by their sales group, but when doing searches in CRM/EP User 1 can see results for users 2 and 3 when doing an opportunity search which are defined outside of user 1's sales group. Does this require any additional config enhancements such as Account or Territory management?
Does this need to be solved by authorizations at field level, or is there a table where these restrictions can be maintained? So far I have been trying to restrict values via CRM_ORD_LP and B_BUPA_BZT.
Not sure if this is the correct forum to post in, if not, is there a forum on here specifically for CRM Authorizations or configuration?
<removed_by_moderator>
Edited by: Julius Bussche on Aug 7, 2008 3:10 PM

Hi Ram,
The way we ended up resolving this was by adding the authorization object B_BUPA_ATT to each sales user role. Each user had a secondary role which defined their particular sales group in the org model.
It involved some programming (which required an outside resource) on our development side, but it worked.
We basically had the consultant write code to perform a check against custom Z values in the AUTHTYPE field, and then the variables were the data placed in
the AUTHVAL1 and AUTHVAL2 fields. And obviously ACTIVITY was whatever the specific user was allowed to do with items in that sales area (postal code, country, etc)
SAP's preferred solution is something called ACE which creates an extra layer of authorizations, however we didn't have the time and resources to properly implement that. You may want to look into that if you have the time.
Hope this information helps!

Recommendation for maintaining pricing in CRM when R/3 is also in landscape

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for