Recommended sizing for ZLM server/infrastructure

Hi,
I hope this is the right category to place this question.
I was wondering if any of you does have some recommendation according to the correct sizing for a ZLM infrastructure meaning how large would be a typical management zone when using the postgres db shipped with ZLM?
What type of hardware are you running your ZLM server software on?
Field reports welcome :)
Best regards
--Daniel

Daniel ,
we have just one management zone with a primary and a secondary at the backup data center. We managed sles 9/10 (soon 11) and RH4 and a bunch of third party software.
The package repository is currently at 35 GB and the database is at 3 GB. The object store is just about 100mb so no need to think about that. that will not grow very much when adding new systems or patches.
What I would take care of is that the database and package repository are located on a logical volume that you can resize online in case you need to expand it. We use reiser for that. The datbase as you can see is also not so big. But when you add new distributions (SLES 11 or so) you might need another3 GB for 32 and 3GB for the 64bit version. Then when then number of updates increase you need even more. Then later on for SP1 again about 5-6GB for both architectures ....
Rainer

Similar Messages

Server Sizing for SQL Server 2005

Hi Experts,
We are having a SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition, we are planning to do a sizing of the server.
Do we have any standard tool or criteria which can be used to come up with an assessment of the hardware enhancement which can be proposed for the server which host SQL server 2005.
Also is there any standard recommendation when setting up a production environment which would host SQL Server
Joji

http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jonathan_kehayias/archive/2010/03/22/sql-server-installation-checklist.aspx
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Recommended books for Sharepoint Server 2007?

I'm looking into Sharepoint for Intranet access and possibly other projects (like Case Management). Can someone recommend some books that cover setup, webparts, interaction with other Applications, etc...?
thanks,
Carlton.

I'm still getting into this myself ... I started with the Administrator's Companion, and honestly I would not not recommend it for a beginner. And this coming from a person who actually PREFERS to read big bulky tech manuals over stuff like novels. But for that particular book, Oh my goodness . . . someone needed to edit it back down just a tad. Do not need entire chapters on why microsoft designed the product the way they did. And how can you publish an 1100 page tech-heavy book and NOT included a stinkin' glossary?!?
OK, rant over.
A few others I'm starting to look at -
Step by Step Windows Sharepoint Services 3.0 - mostly for end-users with how-to's once the beast is magically set up and ready for them to start using. Also missing a glossary.
Sharepoint 2007 Unleashed (SAMS publishing) - Also missing a glossary. But it looks to me like it's got a good approach with heavy technical side. Practical stuff like implementation, design, firewall administration, etc.
Sharepoint 2007 Definitive Guide (O'Reilly) - Also missing a consolidated glossary, but does have some mini-glossaries throughout.
What I ended up doing was going to Microsoft's site, and doing a search for "Sharepoint Webcast." There are a lot of on-demand ones out there, some very good, some not so good. But if you download them for playing later, you can run them at about 1.4 speed and zip through a 60 minute presentation in about 40 minutes. As well as fast-forward when they're talking about stuff you don't want to see. I would highly recommend this approach if you're just hoping to see some good demos of the product in action with some technical discussion included.

SQL Server Sizing for Lync Server 2013

Hi,
We are planning to install Lync Server 2013 with 800 users, but I can find any information about the SQL Server instance sizing.
Can anyone give me an estimation or prior experience with similar installations? I need to know Disk size, memory an CPU number.
Thanks in advance.

There are a few variables to consider. Are you turning on monitoring, archiving, and is enterprise voice enabled? Is persistent chat enabled? Is it virtualized? Is this Lync enterprise edition or standard with a portion of the
databases hosted on full SQL? Are you required to retain any information or logs for a specific amount of time? Are you keeping SQL backups local with maintenance plans and for how long?
I would suggest not going below 16GB for a SQL Server, but you may not need much more. If it's virtual I'd throw 4 cores at it at least and disk space will vary based upon what you're doing and how long you want to keep things. Thick provision
those drives and make sure the logs and databases are on separate partitions.
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications

Sizing for SAP BCM (Business Communication Management)

Hi All
We have to provide a server sizing to be used for SAP BCM (Business Communication Management) module which will be intergrated with SAP CRM and is to be used for call support. As far as we have reached, we require a Windows server and will host MS SQL database with an approx consumer data of 63 lacs consumers.
Please specify the sizing for this server
Thanks in advance
Lokesh

Sorry, forgot to ask how much physical memory you have on each host.
Let's split it to 2 topics.
1. For ECC, since OracleDB and non-unicode page which are the 2 major factors won't be changed, so I would think here we could just do a math, as long as host A has enough memory which is allocated for Oracle and ECC (extended memory) on host B to be added up.
2. For EP, memory tuning size is basically the same for HP JDK and SUN JDK, that each server node is allocated approximately 2.5GB RAM. Besides, 0.8-1GB RAM needs to be left for OS kernel. But in your case, host B is currently holding 200 users which is a big jump for host A(note: only active user quantity matters here).
That's fine if main physical memory is a little short for host A, utilizing multiple less powerful servers as 2nd tier application server to do the load balancing is also a solution with lower TCO.
Regards,
Effan

Sizing IIS ARR for Exchange Server 2013

Hi Everyone,..
I planned to publish Exchange 2013 through IIS ARR server, but I've had trouble finding any data on CPU / memory usage for a dedicated ARR server based on Microsoft recommendation. There are 8000 users that will be access from ARR server.
Hopefully you can help for sizing so
there isn't bottleneck on that server.
Thanks
~IH~

Hi Irfan
The concurrent connections depends upon appConcurrentRequestLimit which has a default value of 5000. I think you need to increase this if in your case the concurrent connections exceed 5000
I have found few articles for your reference
http://www.iis.net/learn/extensions/configuring-application-request-routing-(arr)/achieving-high-availability-and-scalability-arr-and-nlb
http://blogs.technet.com/b/tristank/archive/2008/03/11/maxuserport-what-it-is-what-it-does-when-it-s-important.aspx
https://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/07/19/reverse-proxy-for-exchange-server-2013-using-iis-arr-part-1.aspx
https://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/08/02/part-2-reverse-proxy-for-exchange-server-2013-using-iis-arr.aspx
https://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/08/05/part-3-reverse-proxy-for-exchange-server-2013-using-iis-arr.aspx
Its better to submit this to http://forums.iis.net/ since this is more kind of IIS related issue and you will get better response
Good Luck !!
Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com

SAP Parameter Recommended note for SAP Content Server 6.40

Hi..
we are planning to installation of SAP Content Server 6.40 with SAP MAXDB 7.6 on Solaris, Kindly provide what are the recommendation need to perform before installation of Production system.
Like IO Buffer Cache[MB] , Number of Sessions or any SAP Parameter Recommended note for SAP Content Server 6.40 with SAP MAXDB 7.6.
Regards,
Panu

Hello,
Did you already check the preparations and parameters in the SAP CS 6.40 installation guide ?
You can find topics in the Installation Guide like :
- Planning and Sizing of the Database Instance
- Preparations
For more in depth tuning also have a look at the following document :
Operational Guide - SAP Content Server
This document contains the complete list of Content Server parameters.
Success.
Wim

Server Sizing for OCS

Does anyone / Oracle have a Server Sizing
document for OCS and/or individual modules
[Files, Email, Calendar etc].
Looking at sizing for 100 users, 1000 users,
3000 users.
Thanks
Hemant

Contact you local Oracle Collaboration Suite Product Manager,
they have a really cool online (Internal only) sizing tool for each component of OCS. This question has been asked many times
by various members
Cheers
Justin Miles

Server Sizing For Oracle Database

Hi All,
I need a server sizing for the below mentioned architecture:
This application is basically for logistics company which we are planing to host it centrally with two server's one server for application and one for oracle database along with DR site (Other Location). There are four locations and each location will have 20 users who are going to access this application (20 x 4= 80 Users). We are using MPLS network of 35 mbps bandwidth.
1. Application server: Windows server 2008 R2
2. Database Server: Windows server 2008 R2, Oracle 11g r2
I need a server sizing documents.
Thanks........

EdStevens wrote:
Justin Mungal wrote:
EdStevens wrote:
user1970505 wrote:
Hi All,
I need a server sizing for the below mentioned architecture:
This application is basically for logistics company which we are planing to host it centrally with two server's one server for application and one for oracle database along with DR site (Other Location). There are four locations and each location will have 20 users who are going to access this application (20 x 4= 80 Users). We are using MPLS network of 35 mbps bandwidth.
1. Application server: Windows server 2008 R2
2. Database Server: Windows server 2008 R2, Oracle 11g r2
I need a server sizing documents.
Thanks........I'd seriously reconsider hosting Oracle db on Windows. Obviously there are many, many shops that do. And obviously it is often a case of the fact that they do not have (and choose to not acquire) expertise in Linux. But I've been in IT for 30+ years and have worked on IBM S-370 and its variants and descendents, Windows since v3, DEC VMS, IBM OS/2, Solaris, AIX, HPUX, and Oracle Linux. The first Oracle database I ever created was on Windows 3.11 and at that point I had never seen *nix. Now I am in a position to state that Windows is the worst excuse of an operating system of any I have ever used. I am constantly amazed/amused by how often (at least once a month on schedule, plus unplanned times) that our Windows SA has to send out a notice that he is re-booting his servers. I can't remember the last time we had to reboot a Linux server ( I have 4 of them)
Yes, I'm biased away from Windows, but that bias comes from experience. Hardly a day goes by that I don't see something that causes me to say to whoever is in earshot "have I told you how much I hate Windows?"I was going to refrain from commenting on that, as I assumed they're a Windows shop and aren't open to any other OS (but my assumption could be incorrect).
I haven't been working in IT for as long as many of the folks around here, only about 10 years. I'm a former system admin that maintained both Linux and Windows servers, but my focus was on Windows. In the right hands, Windows can be rock solid. If a system admin has to reboot Windows servers often, he is most likely doing something wrong, or is rebooting for security updates. It's never as simple as "Windows Sucks," or "Linux Sucks;" it all depends on who's running the system (again, in my opinion).
I have seen some windows servers run uninterrupted for so long no one could remember the admin password. But more often memory leaks and the "weekly update" (replacing last weeks bugs with this weeks) is the culprit.
Yes, it really is sad how often you have to reboot for updates if you want to keep your system current. Mind you, it's better to have the fixes then to not have them (maybe). I rebooted my servers about once every month at my old place... which is not that bad.
With that said, in my experience, Oracle on Windows is a major pain. It takes me much longer to do anything. Once you get proficient with a CLI like the bash shell, the Windows GUI can't compare.Agreed. One of my many complaints about Windows is the poor excuse of a shell processor. I'm pretty proficient in command line scripting, but still cringe when I have to do it. Practically every line of code I write for a command script is accompanied by the remark "this is so lame compared to what I could do with a shell script". Same for vi vs. notepad. But my real problem is the memory leaks and the registry. I'm fairly comfortable hacking certain areas of the registry, but the need to and the arcane linkages between different areas of the registry and how they influence 'process environment' remains a mystery to all but a tiny minority of admins. Compare to *nix where everything is well documented and "knowable".
One (of many) anecdotal experiences, this with my personal Win7 laptop. One time it crashed and refused to reboot. A bit of a google search turned up some arcane keystroke sequence to put it into some sort of recovery mode on bootup .. similar to getting into the bios, but the keystroke sequence was much more complex .. it may have involved standing on one foot while entering the sequence. Anyway, it entered a recovery process I've never seen before or since and repaired everything. My first thought was "hey, that was pretty cool." Then my second thought was 'but only Windows would need such a facility.
Bottom line? To paraphrase a famous Tom Hanks character, "My momma always said Windows was like a box of chocolates. You never know just what you'll get."Haha... I like that one. Yes, the registry is definitely horrible. It's amazing to me that a single point of failure was Microsoft's answer to INI files.
I think Windows and nix have their places. Server work definitely seems more productive to me in a nix environment, but I think I'd jump off a cliff if I had to use it as my desktop environment day-in-day-out. The other problem is application lock-down; I can't blame the OS for that, but it's a reality... and using virtualization to run those applications seems to defeat the point to me.

Proper server sizing for SPARC/Solaris to Intel/R migrations

Is there any collateral available concerning proper server sizing for customers migrating from SPARC/Solaris to Intel/RHEL? I was just asked by our account team that is working with a very large custormer in the pharma space.
My initial knee jerk was to refer them to the OEM but thought I'd look around in these forums first.
My searches have not returned any good results yet.

Hi Mike
the public SAP SD-Benchmark homepage ([http://www.sap.com/benchmark/|http://www.sap.com/benchmark/] -> SD two-tier results) gives interesting but very indirect sizing hints. There are several SAP SD-Benchmarks on SPARC/Solaris. I picked some of them:
[2008075|http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=B1FEF26EB0CC3466320983FEDBEB2A47615DC8F24866B0B6870E95AA3589B515566F7A57D98961BB]: 24650 SD-User w SAP ERP 6.0 (2005 Non-Unicode) on SPARC Enterprise Server M9000 (32CPUs)
[2008062|http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7C974D9FC4D21DA80E794CB437BC196262799B27A2BB01B9D6]: 825 SD-User w SAP ERP 6.0 (2005 Non-Unicode) on SPARC Enterprise Server M3000 (1CPU)
[2008058|http://download.sap.com/download.epd?context=40E2D9D5E00EEF7CB82813BD3F95797BAEB80527B36EC026E03386D659E4DE48]: 7520 SD-User w SAP ERP 6.0 (2005 Non-Unicode) on SPARC Enterprise T5440 (4CPUs)
You'll probably have the hardware setup of your customer together with the system utilization. Check it with the Solaris/SPARC benchmarks on the public page and check for Intel Benchmarks as well. Make sure, that the SAP release is the same (with 2009 a new SAP release is mandatory for benchmarks -> numbers are not comparable to 100%).
Thanks,
Hannes

Sizing for NW2004s 7.0 App server

Hi All
This is regarding the sizing req's for SAP NW2004s (7.0) app server which is required for the installation of GTS. I am going through the req's for a new implementation of GTS 7.1 for a very small user group ( Less than 10) on AIX with Oracle.
I have been told that the initial estimates for the server HD size cam up to 75 gb each for the DEV and QA and this apparently includes the app+db.
I am not familiar with the quicksizer and someone else arrived at this number. I doubt that 75 gb for an ABAP+JAVA NW 7.0 install would be sufficient to house the db and app and am still reading through documentation to verify this.
Can someone who has gone through the NW app server installations clarify this and let me know if there is a breakup of file sizes for the Orcale and the SAP files for an NW 2004s app server install.
Thanks
Vic

Was this installation done on UNIX ?
: nope System that I tell you is windows.
Do you have any breakup for the SAP sytem and the Database files (sapdata and teh log files) ?
: BREAKUP ???? did you mean backup if "backup" is YES.
Does this account for the swap space and how RAM do you have on your system ?
: for RAM I have on my system is 9GB but I can install 3 instance(SID) and DB in one Server
maybe we can share Exp. in how to tuning for best performance next time

SAP Content Server sizing for DMS

Hi
Can anyone advise on the most appropriate way to 'size' for a new Content Server. Documents have been stored in the SAP DB till now, but the use is increasing, so now a new Content Server is to be added and all existing documents migrated into it. I have seen references in the past to SAP methodology for sizing the content server, but now cant find any.
Thanks

Dear John
Please find these links on how to do SAP content Server sizing.
https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700006713092002E
Please check this on service market place.
With Regards
Mangesh Pande
Edited by: MANGESH PANDE on Feb 25, 2011 6:18 AM

Why Windows server 2003 enterprise edi is the recommended OS for Netweaver?

Hi All,
I am in a client discussion stage and the client is a huge enterprise going for SAP installation.
In order to implement SAP Netweaver 2004 S, the recommended OS is Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition?
I need to be equipped about the difference feature wise between Enterprise and Standard Edition.
Any kind of help is really appreciated.
It is a bit urgent.
So Tribe please come together and help me out.
Points will be rewarded for the timely help.
Thanks
Anila

why not have a look yourself
-> http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windowsserver/bb294403.aspx
as you might see, the standard edition of win2k3 only supports up to 4 gb of ram, 4 cpus and it seems that there will be not 64bit edition...so, these might be some reasons, why sap recommends the enterprise edition
GreetZ, AH

Oracle Grid Infrastructure 11g R2 for standalone server

hi experts
can you tell me how to install linux and Oracle Grid Infrastructure 11g R2 for standalone server.i need to create two diskgroup as well
please send me step by step document if you have
thanks

user1175505 wrote:
hi experts
can you tell me how to install linux and Oracle Grid Infrastructure 11g R2 for standalone server.i need to create two diskgroup as well
please send me step by step document if you have
thanksIt's all documented here http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e17212/toc.htm
Cheers

How to install oracle 11gR2 Grid Infrastructure for standalond server

Hi Experts,
we do not want to install ASM. under this condition, does any expert install oracle 11gR2 Grid Infrastructure for standalone server in Linux 5 at file system?
Please share tip and experiences of installed oracle 11gR2 as single instance include install oracle 11gR2 Grid Infrastructure for standalone server in Linux 5. no one node RAC configuration.
If we do not install 11gR2 Grid Infrastructure for standalone server . which function will be lost? restat server only?
Thanks
Jim

Grid Infrastructure automatically uses Oracle Restart as default if you're installing Standalone. You can turn this off using crsctl ('disable has', I believe).
According to the inference in the install docs (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e16763/oraclerestart.htm#CIHCBGCC), you can install 11gR2 without Grid Infrastructure, but you lose ASM and Restart.

Recommended sizing for ZLM server/infrastructure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for