Reconciliation amount must be less than the balance due for this tran

Hi,
I received the error below when creating an outgoing payment for the invoices.
"Reconciliation amount must be less than the balance due for this transaction."
I have found this thread from Forum "Reconciliation amount must be less than the balance due for this trans " but that was posted in 2009 Jul.
The database version I am using is 2007B PL 13.
Kindly suggest if you know the solution for 2007b PL 13 for the above mentioned error.
Thank you.
Regards,
Yadana

Hi Yadana,
The solution from that thread is still valid for you. Your version is as early as 2008.
Thanks,
Gordon

Similar Messages

  • The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount

    Hi all,
    Our customers are using SAP 2007-PL15 and SAP 2007-PL41.
    When we want to create a down payment for a sales order, and we want to pay the entire amount of the sales order, including tax, we have to put an amount inthe TOTAL field of the Down Payment window since by default, the down payment amount is the total of the invoice before applying tax.  The DPM is
    higher than 100% (strange but I think it's normal since the down payment is not planned to take the tax in consideration).
    Then, we create an incoming payment for this down payment. It's ok.
    Then, we create an invoice based on the sales order we have paid with the down payment. It's impossible to use the down payment for the invoice... why that ? We receive the error 'The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount'. This causes big headaches to our customers !!
    Could you explain us what to do please ?
    thanks,
    Luce

    I'm very sorry, I have a similar question in dealing with AP Down Payment Request Linked to AP Invoice,  my case like this:
    1. I created 3 AP DPRs,their amount are each 100,000 RMB(for example, their document number are 10,11,12). then do the outgoing payment fully paided.
    2. I created a AP Invoice with the amount 150,000 RMB(for example, this AR Invoice document number is 5). I use the buttom"Total Down Payment",and selecet AP DRP No.10 and 11. When I click the buttom"Add",an error shows:
    The amount of down payment must be less than the invoice amount
    and I don't know how to continue.....
    Many Thanks
    Kam
    (PS:My English is poor,forgive me please. Shall I Speak in Chinese? then I can describe this question more clearly.)

  • GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.

    Dear Gurus,
                         if anybody puts GR date lesser than the PO date, system should display error this happens because the system allows back dated posting of 101 MVT in MIGO.Similarly the IR date should not be less than the GR date. This happens because the system allows back dated posting of MIRO also.
    Regards
    ASHOK K

    Hi,
    Use the badi MB_DOCUMENT_BADI  and compare dates of EKKO-BEDAT and MKPF-BLDAT for MIGO.
    USe the badi IF_EX_MRM_INVOICE_UPDATE PROCESS_AT_ and compare the dates of MKPF-BLDAT and RBKP-BLDAT while saving the invoice for checking the back dated entries and throw an error message.
    Regards,
    Bharat

  • F-28 partial incoming payment entered more than the net due

    Dear Experts,
    My users are entering the partial payments in F-28 transactions more than the net due. How can we avoid these in future.
    And secondly how can we do the transactions where in the amount received is more than the net due.
    with regards
    Ramesh Y

    Hello Ramesh,
    If you receive more amount than net due, then you can post these amount with special gl indicator in transaction F-29 as a advance. So that this amount is being displayed separately in FBL5N.
    Rgds
    Murali. N

  • The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.

    All,
    Please help!!
    I have tested my Application Client Project in WSAD on my pc and it works fine.
    I have 1gb RAM on my pc. When I deploy the same app on another xp pc(same as mine but 512mb RAM) I get a heap size error. Here is the exact error:
    Incompatible initial and maximum heap sizes specified:
    initial size: 268435456 bytes, maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes
    The initial heap size must be less than or equal to the maximum heap size.
    The default initial and maximum heap sizes are 4194304 and 267380736 bytes.
    Usage: java [-options] class [args...]
    (to execute a class)
    or java -jar [-options] jarfile [args...]
    (to execute a jar file)
    where options include:
    -cp -classpath <directories and zip/jar files separated by ;>
    set search path for application classes and resources
    -D<name>=<value>
    set a system property
    -verbose[:class|gc|jni]
    enable verbose output
    -version print product version
    -showversion print product version and continue
    -? -help print this help message
    -X print help on non-standard options
    Could not create the Java virtual machine.
    Press any key to continue . . .
    Here is the batch file that runs my app:
    @echo off
    SET appClientEar=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\MTSClientEAR.ear
    set JVM_ARGS=-Xms256M -Xmx256M
    set CLIENT_PROPS=C:\corp\apps\mts\jars\medicalclient.properties
    set APP_ARGS=
    call C:\bnsf\IBM\WebSphere\AppClient\bin\launchClientBNSF.bat "%JVM_ARGS%" %appClientEar% "-CCpropfile=%CLIENT_PROPS%" %APP_ARGS%
    @pause
    I have changed the value of Xms and Xmx of JVM_ARGS to different size but I sitll get error. Anyone knows what the problem is. Thanks..

    Don't know why, but the "maximum heap size: 267380736 bytes" value is just slightly less than 256*1024*1024, wheras the reported initial size is equal to that.
    Try setting the initial value to 255MB.

  • SharePoint 2010, Visual Studio 2010, Packaging a solution - The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.

    Hi,
    I have a solution that used to contain one SharePoint 2010 project. The project is named along the following lines:
    <Company>.<Product>.SharePoint - let's call it Project1 for future reference. It contains a number of features which have been named according
    to their purpose, some are reasonably long and the paths fairly deep. As far as I am concerned we are using sensible namespaces and these reflect our company policy of "doing things properly".
    I first encountered the following error message when packaging the aforementioned SharePoint project into a wsp:
    "The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters."
    I went through a great deal of pain in trying to rename the project, shorten feature names and namespaces etc... until I got it working. I then went about gradually
    renaming everything until eventually I had what I started with, and it all worked. So I was none the wiser...not ideal, but I needed to get on and had tight delivery timelines.
    Recently we wanted to add another SharePoint project so that we could move some of our core functinality out into a separate SharePoint solution - e.g. custom workflow
    error logging. So we created another project in Visual Studio called:
    <Company>.<Product>.SharePoint.<Subsystem> - let's call it Project2 for future reference
    And this is when the error has come back and bitten me! The scenario is now as follows:
    1. project1 packages and deploys successfully with long feature names and deep paths.
    2. project2 does not package and has no features in it at all. The project2 name is 13 characters longer than project1
    I am convinced this is a bug with Visual Studio and/or the Package MSBuild target. Why? Let me explain my findings so far:
    1. By doing the following I can get project2 to package
    In Visual Studio 2010 show all files of project2, delete the obj, bin, pkg, pkgobj folders.
    Clean the solution
    Shut down Visual Studio 2010
    Open Visual Studio 2010
    Rebuild the solution
    Package the project2
    et voila the package is generated!
    This demonstrates that the package error message is in fact inaccurate and that it can create the package, it just needs a little help, since Visual Studio seems to
    no longer be hanging onto something.
    Clearly this is fine for a small time project, but try doing this in an environment where we use Continuous Integration, Unit Testing and automatic deployment of SharePoint
    solutions on a Build Server using automated builds.
    2. I have created another project3 which has a ludicrously long name, this packages fine and also has no features contained within it.
    3. I have looked at the length of the path under the pkg folder for project1 and it is large in comparison to the one that is generated for project2, that is when it
    does successfully package using the method outlined in 1. above. This is strange since project1 packages and project2 does not.
    4. If I attempt to add project2 to my command line build using MSBuild then it fails to package and when I then open up Visual Studio and attempt to package project2
    from the Visual Studio UI then it fails with the path too long error message, until I go through the steps outlined in 1. above to get it to package.
    5. DebugView shows nothing useful during the build and packaging of the project.
    6. The error seems to occur in
    CreateSharePointProjectService target called at line 365 of
    Microsoft.VisualStudio.SharePoint.targetsCurrently I am at a loss to work out why this is happening? My next task is to delete
    project2 completely and recreate it and introduce it into my Visual Studio solution.
    Microsoft, can you confirm whether this is a known issue and whether others have encountered this issue? Is it resolved in a hotfix?
    Anybody else, can you confirm whether you have come up with a solution to this issue? When I mean a solution I mean one that does not mean that I have to rename my namespaces,
    project etc... and is actually workable in a meaningful Visual Studio solution.

    Hi
    Yes, I thought I had fixed this my moving my solution from the usual documents  to
    c:\v2010\projectsOverflow\DetailedProjectTimeline
    This builds ok, but when I come to package I get the lovely error:
    Error 2 The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters. C:\VS2010\ProjectsOverflow\DetailedProjectTimeline\VisualDetailedProjectTimelineWebPart\Features\Feature1\Feature1.feature VisualDetailedProjectTimeline
    Now, the error seems to be related to 
    Can anyone suggest what might be causing this. Probably some path in an XML file somewhere. Here is my prime suspect!
    <metaData>
    <type name="VisualDetailedProjectTimelineWebPart.VisualProjectTimelineWebPart.VisualProjectTimeline, $SharePoint.Project.AssemblyFullName$" />
    <importErrorMessage>$Resources:core,ImportErrorMessage;</importErrorMessage>
    </metaData>
    <data>
    <properties>
    <property name="Title" type="string">VisualProjectTimelineWebPart</property>
    <property name="Description" type="string">My Visual WebPart</property>
    </properties>
    </data>
    </webPart>
    </webParts>
    .... Unless I can solve this I will have to remove the project and recreate but with simple paths. Tho I will be none the wiser if I come across this again.
    Daniel

  • TFS Build Error - Exception Message: The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters

    I am trying to set-up CI of Orchard CMS and deploy it on Azure using TF service. I am stuck at following error for path being
    longer than 260 characters. However, when counted the total characters in path are 235. Please see the below error :
    Other Errors and Warnings
    1 error(s), 1 warning(s)
    Exception Message: TF400889: The following path contains more than the allowed 259 characters: drop/_PublishedWebsites/Orchard.Web_Package/Archive/Content/C_C/a/src/projects/Orchard/dev/DevAltaf/Orchard/src/Orchard.Web/obj/Debug/Package/PackageTmp/Modules/BrentApart.BannerManager/Scripts/controllers/bannerAssignmentController.js. Specify a shorter path. (type VssServiceException)
    Exception Stack Trace: at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Workflow.Activities.FileContainerDropProvider.EndCopyDirectory(IAsyncResult result)
    at Microsoft.TeamFoundation.Build.Workflow.Activities.CopyDirectory.EndExecute(AsyncCodeActivityContext context, IAsyncResult result)
    at System.Activities.AsyncCodeActivity.CompleteAsyncCodeActivityData.CompleteAsyncCodeActivityWorkItem.Execute(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager)
    Inner Exception Details:
    Exception Message: The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters. (type PathTooLongException)
    Did anyone came across such issue while deploying Orchard on Azure with TF service? If yes, how did you sort this freaking error?
    Thanks,
    Altaf B.

    Hi AltafB,
    For your situation, you can short the path for the source code. Or use a short path for build agent folder in your build definition. You can refer to the links below to solve your problem:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/aaronhallberg/archive/2007/06/20/team-build-and-260-character-paths.aspx
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/1638a5f0-9321-4ff9-9ee7-6d347badb972/please-some-solution-to-the-specified-path-file-name-or-both-are-too-long?forum=tfsbuild
    Besides, since you deploy Orchard to Azure, you can also publish it directly using publish profile in Visual Stduio or WebMatrix directly.
    Best regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • PO is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO am

    Purchase Order is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO amount. The release strategy is only working for the first Purchase Order and if the PO amount is greater than the last PO amount.
    Please let me know how to correct this scenario (release strategy).
    Regards,
    Prishu

    Hi,
    Release strategy has nothing do with the previous PO amount. May be, Co-incidently the amount in previous PO which you are referring and the characteristics value maintained in the release strategy is same.
    1) Please go in release strategy by the path mentioned below
    IMG u2013 Material Management u2013 Purchasing u2013 Purchase Requisition u2013 Release Procedure u2013 Procedure with Classification u2013 Set Up Procedure with Classification
    2) Then go to release strategy. Here the total available release strategies would be displayed. Double click the strategy which is getting reflected in the PO you want and go the classifiction tab. There you will get the PO value. Based on this characteristic value the respective release streategy gets refelected.
    I hope this clarifies.
    Regards
    sachin

  • Get-ChildItem : The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.

    Hi, Im trying to get the whole path in my server, so i tried that with this following code
    Get-ChildItem $sourceFolder  -Recurse | ?{$_.PsIsContainer} |Get-Acl
    But then, it showed me somtehing like this :
    Get-ChildItem : The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.
     I tried to find the solver everywhere and mostly they propose to change the path name, which is impossible, since I am working with my company server, and those folder have already there before i start to work here, then the other ask me to use robocopy,
    but all of the trick just dont work
    is there any way to solve this problem? thanks

    There is no simple solution to this. And it is not a limitation of powershell itself, but of the underlying NTFS file system.
    If the problem is that a folder with a name longer than 248 exists anywhere within your directory structure, you are hooped.
    If the problem is that some fully qualified path names exceed 260 characters, then, in those cases, the solution already given is to create a psdrive partway up the path from the drive letter or server/share root of the path. Unfortunately, the output produced
    will be relative to that psdrive and not to what is specified as the $sourcefolder.
    unless you already know where those problematic paths are, you might consider trying to trap those errors and have your script figure out where it needs to create psdrives. You might then be able to calculate the equivalent path for each file or folder and
    output that. the programming effort would be simpler to just created a psdrive for each folder encountered, however I expect that would be very inefficient.
    Al Dunbar -- remember to 'mark or propose as answer' or 'vote as helpful' as appropriate.

  • Amount to credit greater than credit balance - goods return to AP Cred Note

    Hi All,
    I've got the following scenario:
    We have a AP Goods Return on the system which totals £12.94 with freight charges of -£3.75. We have copied this to a AP Credit Note, but have amended the freight from -£3.75 to -£3.00(UK VAT Rate 15% applicable throughout). The total credit field now shows £13.80 and the credit balance field shows £12.94. When you try to add the document it gives an error "amount to credit greater than credit balance". I'm using 2005A PL53.
    Can anyone please advise the reason behind the error and also what the correct way of handling this kind of transaction would be?
    Kind regards,
    Matt

    Hi Wesley,
    I tried both methods and it doesn't resolve the issue. Spoke to SAP, they gave me a solution and workaround, the issue is a bit more complicated as what it may seem. You manually have to close the goods return, create a standalone service credit note with the appropriate GL account to reverse out the "goods clearing account" entry created by the reversal journal. The bahaviour has been changed in SBO 2007 and therefore the problem is not present in this version anymore. Thanks for your help anyway.
    Kind regards,
    Matt
    Edited by: Greeff Matt on Jun 5, 2009 9:47 AM

  • With my KLIPSCH - the FIDELITY and REAR VOLUME is signaficantly less than the front chan

    I had always been using KLIPSCH PRO AUDIO speakers, and I must say - they are simply incredible. I just bought another complete set of KLIPSCH 2. for the rear channel of my AUDIGY LS card ---- but and the FIDELITY and VOLUME is significantly less than the front channel. Is it that card? Is it the synthesized rear volume because it's not true 4 channel? It's that CMSS Or should I just hook up the rear to the front channel with a simple y connector?I want to hook up my whole whose with satellite KLIPCSH and just a few subwoofers.And I want to do with that LS card and Y connectors.Am I correct here - or do I need something MORE?__________Joliett

    Please tell me if I'm right...the rear speakers input from a stereo source is not true 4 channel. So the fidelity and volume is somewhat different than the front channel.
    To get the same fidelity, I need to use Y-connectors to join the fron speakers to the rear.
    Or is there a soundcard that is better for that kind of installation?

  • Total budget 0.00 EUR in order 12412100 is less than the cumulative bud

    Dear  Sir,
    In t.code KO22 it gives error while saving amount in original budget field for 2008,
    "The total budget 0.00 EUR in order 15210080 is less than the cumulative budget 2.16 EUR.
    The cumulative budget is the total of the annual budgets."
    Can you pls guide.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Mukherjee S on Mar 31, 2008 1:47 PM

    You might have distirbuted the values  (2.16 EUR) over years. In this case you need to enter the value in Overall Budget also.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • TS4002 Anyone has this error when trying to enable Mail/Notes in iCloud? "Your email address must be less than 21 characters"

    Is this a bug?
    Any workarounds?

    You're being asked to create a [email protected] address and you're entering an address at your domain. The 'something' must be less than 21 characters and can only be followed by '@icloud.com'.

  • Messages in Xi is less than the messages in R/3 server after processing.

    Hi Experts
    I have a scenario file - Idoc.
    XI picks up the file from FTP process it and sends to the R/3 server.
    Now I have a problem is when I check the Data in XI using IDX5 or SXMB_MONI the no of messages in xi is less than the messages in R/3 server.
    I am checking the data of the last day like 8th May from 00:00:00 to 23:59:59 in both the cases.
    In R/3 I check using BD87 t code.
    Thanx

    Hi Divyesh
    Thanks for your prompt reply.
    Ya I am also doing exactly the same . But the problem is that I am checking for yesterday datas.
    In idx5 I get total of 2625 messages for  orders.
    When I check the same on BD87 i get 2636 messages with status 53 & 1 message with status 51.
    Difference is of 11.
    Now the question in how is it possible that it is picking 2625 data from FTP and after processing its sending 2637 data on R/3 server.
    Thanx

  • I am debating between the 13in 2.9ghz mac book pro or the 13in 2.5 ghz mac book pro with all the same specs bbut for me i am trying to see which one for the money is better becuase the 2.5 will run me 100-200 dollars less than the other

    I am debating between the 13in 2.9ghz mac book pro or the 13in 2.5 ghz mac book pro with all the same specs bbut for me i am trying to see which one for the money is better becuase the 2.5 will run me 100-200 dollars less than the other

    Only you can make that determination. All things being equal the 2.5 GHz model is slower.

Maybe you are looking for