Reconciliation problem in J1IFQ

Dear Friends,
I have the problem while I make J1IFQ. "Material X1 is not assigned fully, short by
0.885 KG."
While the material for wihich this message is a semifinished material with "scrap" a material group. This material does not come into the quantities to be reconciled as this is ascrap and coming thru 545 movt. Thus remaining Semifinished material X2 which has to be reconciled is not getting reconciled.
The message No is Message no. 8I574.
Can one tell me where from the "Assigned" quantity comes.
Thanks and Regards,
Deepak Andhale

In transaction J1ifq,there is a tab for assigning quantity.It will be just above the item details field and lokks like "calculator".
Click it, the quantity will be assigned from GR reference.

Similar Messages

Subcontract Challan Reconciliation Problem

Dear Sir,
We are facing a probelm related to Subcontract Challan Reconciliation , problem scenario is as below :
a) We had created a Subcontract PO and transferred the relevant material to Vendor Stock against the PO reference .
b) During MIGO , by mistake we could not mention the Challan Number . So MIGO was done without Challan reference number .
As input material has already been received , so now we want to reconcile the challan (using Tcode J1IFQ) . Pl guide us as what steps need to be followed to address the problem .
With Thanks and Rgds
B Mittal

Hi,
There is no mandatry condition to ref challan while creating GR.
In J1IFQ , you can enter the Gr Number + Challan Number + Challan Year
With this process you will able to link the GR with challan.
Hope this is helpful
thanks

Subcontractor qty reconciliation problem

Hi, I am Manoj here and need your help on subcontractor quantity reconciliation.
Scenario is, subcontract PO is made, 57F4 challan is made, material is transferred to subcontractor, GR for finished material is done, and then qty is reconciled in J1IFQ.
User has created subcontract PO for a material having three child components (A, B & C), material transferred using Transfer Posting to subcontractor. Three 57F4 challans created for all three child components (A, B, & C) and materials send to vendor. Finished material received and GR done using MIGO against PO. At the time of GR, challan reference given for all the three challan and qty. for first child component (A) was put against first item (A) but qty for second (B) & third (C) items were put against second (B) item only. No qty entered against third (C) item.
Now the problem is, we are not able to reconcile the subcontractor account using J1IFQ. J1IFR is showing the pending qty for third item (C). We are not able to do J1IFQ against third challan for item (C) as it was wrongly received against item (B). System shows error Challan material is different from material document (Message No. 8I572), as challan shows material (C) while material document shows material (B).
How to reconcile material C with material B? Can we make any change in challan by any means? We cant change GR material document as received qty has been approved by QA and consumed also.
Please do help in this regard.
Thanks & regards
Manoj Gupta

Hello
Help me in resolving this issue. Still the problem is not resolved.
Giving you the problem details.
User has created subcontract PO for a material having three child components (A, B & C), material transferred using Transfer Posting to subcontractor. Three 57F4 challans created for all three child components (A, B, & C) and materials send to vendor. Finished material received and GR done using MIGO against PO. At the time of GR, challan reference given for all the three challan and qty. for first child component (A) was put against first item (A) but qty for second (B) & third (C) items were put against second (B) item only. No qty entered against third (C) item.
Now the problem is, we are not able to reconcile the subcontractor account using J1IFQ. J1IFR is showing the pending qty for third item (C). We are not able to do J1IFQ against third challan for item (C) as it was wrongly received against item (B). System shows error Challan material is different from material document* (Message No. 8I572), as challan shows material (C) while material document shows material (B).
How to reconcile material C? Also MIRO has been done and payment made to vendor.
Please do help in this regard.
Thanks & regards
Manoj Gupta

Problem in J1IFQ quantity reconcilation

Dear all,
Still my problem is open, i am unable to reconcile the challan quantity in J1IFQ. It is not recognising the 545 O movement type in MIGO. i have declared that in subcontracting attributes with 0002 movement group. still i am unable to reconcile the scrap material quantity. Hope experts respond......
if somebody have scenario screen shots please send them to [email protected]
regards,
vvr sharma
Dear Venkadesh,
Please mail the document to [email protected] and [email protected] Your timely help is much appreciated. thanks in advance.
regards,
vvr sharma

Hi Santosh,
Batch split is not my scenario. I am sending raw material to the suncontracting vendor and receiving finished goods from him. i am mentioning the scrap to be returned by him as a separate material in BOM with -ve quantity. i am also able to create the challan and do GR . during GR also the system is defaulting 101, 543 O and 545 O movement types. the problem is while J1IFQ. the sysytem is gig=ving a message that the by product quantity is not assigned. i have also maintained the 545 O movement type as 0002 movement group in the suncontracting attributes.
please send me the real time scenario screen shots if anyone has such scenario and anyother solution deliverable to the client.
[email protected]
thanks in advance
reg
vvr sharma

Problem in J1IFQ-reg

Dear Sir/ Madam,
We are encountering the Problem During Reconcilation of Quantity in Subcontracting cycle Received in Multiple Batches.
The Following steps are followed,
1. We have created a Subcontract PO with BOM Explosion.
2. The Required Components are issued through MB1B.
3. Subcontract Challan Raised in J1IF01.
4. We created the Goods Receipt for the Processed MAterial Which has come in Two Batches.Hence we have used Distribute Quantity and split the Qty and Entered the Batch Numbers.Document Posted.
5. In Transation J1IFQ, We have entered Material Document Number and Challan Number and Executed.
6. Top of the Screen Material Document Details with Open Quantity are Displayed.There were two Line items displayed with Movement type 101.Since it is Received in Two Batches.The Consumed Quantities were shown in Movement type 543.
7. Bottom of the Screen the Challan details were displayed with Challan Quantity.
8.The Open Input quantities are assigned cumulatively against DC Quantity for both the Batches.
9. When we check the Allocation it gives an Message saying that"Material XXXXXXXXXX is not assigned fully, short by XX.XXX KG".
Note: We are not facing any problem If the Goods Receipt is made for the Single Batch.
Kindly Give us Your Valuable Input In order to Solve the Problem.
Regards,
M.Murugesan

Hi Santosh,
Batch split is not my scenario. I am sending raw material to the suncontracting vendor and receiving finished goods from him. i am mentioning the scrap to be returned by him as a separate material in BOM with -ve quantity. i am also able to create the challan and do GR . during GR also the system is defaulting 101, 543 O and 545 O movement types. the problem is while J1IFQ. the sysytem is gig=ving a message that the by product quantity is not assigned. i have also maintained the 545 O movement type as 0002 movement group in the suncontracting attributes.
please send me the real time scenario screen shots if anyone has such scenario and anyother solution deliverable to the client.
[email protected]
thanks in advance
reg
vvr sharma

Problem in J1IFQ -Reconciling the Qty -Received in Multiple Batches- reg

Dear Sir/ Madam,
We are encountering the Problem During Reconcilation of Quantity in Subcontracting cycle Received in Multiple Batches.
The Following steps are followed,
1. We have created a Subcontract PO with BOM Explosion.
2. The Required Components are issued through MB1B.
3. Subcontract Challan Raised in J1IF01.
4. We created the Goods Receipt for the Processed MAterial Which has come in Two Batches.Hence we have used Distribute Quantity and split the Qty and Entered the Batch Numbers.Document Posted.
5. In Transation J1IFQ, We have entered Material Document Number and Challan Number and Executed.
6. Top of the Screen Material Document Details with Open Quantity are Displayed.There were two Line items displayed with Movement type 101.Since it is Received in Two Batches.The Consumed Quantities were shown in Movement type 543.
7. Bottom of the Screen the Challan details were displayed with Challan Quantity.
8.The Open Input quantities are assigned cumulatively against DC Quantity for both the Batches.
9. When we check the Allocation it gives an Message saying that"Material XXXXXXXXXX is not assigned fully, short by XX.XXX KG".
Note: We are not facing any problem If the Goods Receipt is made for the Single Batch.
Kindly Give us Your Valuable Input In order to Solve the Problem.
Regards,
M.Murugesan

Hi,
You don't need to create 10 process orders to split for 10 batches, In one process order itself you can do batch splitting in CO11N (auto GR) or MB31.
Pl check the below link
Process order with multiple batches of finished product
thanks,
JK

Microsoft Exchange Connector Reconciliation Problem

Hi,
i am trying to run the Exchange Target Resource User Reconciliation and Exchange User Distribution Group Lookup Reconciliation scheduled tasks but i am getting below mentioned error.
ConnectorServer.exe Error: 0 : Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Common.Exceptions.ConnectorException: Problem while PowerShell execution System.Management.Automation.ParameterBindingException: A parameter cannot be found that matches parameter name 'IgnoreDefaultScope'.
at System.Management.Automation.CmdletParameterBinderController.VerifyArgumentsProcessed()
at System.Management.Automation.CmdletParameterBinderController.BindCommandLineParametersNoValidation(Collection`1 arguments)
at System.Management.Automation.CmdletParameterBinderController.BindCommandLineParameters(Collection`1 arguments)
at System.Management.Automation.CommandProcessor.BindCommandLineParameters(CommandParameterInternal[] parameters)
at System.Management.Automation.CommandProcessor.Prepare(CommandParameterInternal[] parameters)
at System.Management.Automation.CommandProcessorBase.DoPrepare(CommandParameterInternal[] parameters)
at System.Management.Automation.Internal.PipelineProcessor.Start(Boolean incomingStream)
at System.Management.Automation.Internal.PipelineProcessor.SynchronousExecuteEnumerate(Object input, Hashtable errorResults, Boolean enumerate)
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Exchange.Service.Impl.PowerShellExchangeServiceImpl.InvokePipeline(Command cmd) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\Exchange\ExchangeConnector\PowerShellExchangeConnectorServiceImpl.cs:line 635
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Exchange.Service.Impl.PowerShellExchangeServiceImpl.SearchDistributionGroups(ObjectClass oclass, String query, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options, ObjectClassInfo ocInfo) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\Exchange\ExchangeConnector\PowerShellExchangeConnectorServiceImpl.cs:line 293
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Exchange.Service.Impl.PowerShellExchangeServiceImpl.ExecuteQuery(ObjectClass oclass, String query, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\Exchange\ExchangeConnector\PowerShellExchangeConnectorServiceImpl.cs:line 252
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Exchange.ExchangeConnector.ExecuteQuery(ObjectClass oclass, String query, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_oimcp\idc\bundles\dotnet\Exchange\ExchangeConnector\ExchangeConnector.cs:line 228
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.RawSearcherImpl`1.RawSearch(SearchOp`1 search, ObjectClass oclass, Filter filter, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 1223
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.RawSearcherImpl`1.RawSearch(Object search, ObjectClass oclass, Filter filter, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 1194
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.SearchImpl.Search(ObjectClass oclass, Filter originalFilter, ResultsHandler handler, OperationOptions options) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 1156
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Api.Local.Operations.ConnectorAPIOperationRunnerProxy.Invoke(Object proxy, MethodInfo method, Object[] args) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\ApiLocalOperations.cs:line 244
at ___proxy1.Search(ObjectClass , Filter , ResultsHandler , OperationOptions )
at Org.IdentityConnectors.Framework.Impl.Server.ConnectionProcessor.ProcessOperationRequest(OperationRequest request) in c:\ADE\aime_icf\icf\framework\dotnet\FrameworkInternal\Server.cs:line 609
Please any one suggest to me on this error.
Thanks,
venu

Yes we finally solved it.
The Exchange connector creates mailboxes in the Exchange Server using the CreateMailboxExchange2007.vbs script. This script invokes another program called PowerShell.exe. We found out there were 2 different versions of Powershell.exe in our system. One of them was obsolete and it was the one being called. We solved the problem specifying the complete path of the good Powershell.exe version in the CreateMailboxExchange2007.vbs script ($PowerShell_PATH$/Powershell.exe...).
Regards

BP Internal Reconciliation problem

Hi,
I am working with B1 2007A PL41.
When I click BP-> Internal Reconciliation-> Reconciliation, select BP and click reconcile. Then for ARIN dated 1.August I change the amount to part amount and select an incoming payment dated 13.August - here too the same part amount entered - the total reconciled amount nets to zero - reconciliation date is 13.August -> click Reconcile -> Pop-up "Reconcile the selected transactions?" -> Yes -> nothing happens. System date is later than 13.August.
The reconciliation does not proceed and the screen simply remains the same.
What could be the problem?
Thanks,
Ajay Audich

Hi Ajay,
I am unable to reproduce such problem in my test enviorment.
Just before i ask you and open a support ticket to SAP regarding the issue faced,
Please check the following :
1) If any SP_transactionNotification is there, do check that.
2) Any Add-ons, then you can check by stopping that.
If that does not help, approaching support is better.
Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

GTC Reconciliation Problem

Hi ,
We have configured a GTC to Reconcile with a table from an Oracle Database.
When running the recon task, the following error appears in the logs:
ERROR,05 Jan 2011 11:06:40,063,[OIMCP.DATC],Class/Method: DBReconTransportProvider/getFirstPage encounter some problems: Attribute: ID_USUARIO does not exist in the specified parent table/view: ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST
com.thortech.xl.gc.exception.DBException: Attribute: ID_USUARIO does not exist in the specified parent table/view: ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.common.DBFacade.validateAttrExistence(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.common.DBFacade.getSchema(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.recon.DBReconTransportProvider.getSchema(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.recon.DBReconTransportProvider.getFirstPage(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.runtime.GCScheduleTask.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.tasks.SchedulerBaseTask.run(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper$TaskExecutionAction.run(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:41)
at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.weblogicLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper.execute(Unknown Source)
at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:178)
at org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:477)
ERROR,05 Jan 2011 11:06:40,068,[XELLERATE.GC.FRAMEWORKRECONCILIATION],Reconciliation Encountered error:
com.thortech.xl.gc.exception.ProviderException: Attribute: ID_USUARIO does not exist in the specified parent table/view: ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.recon.DBReconTransportProvider.getFirstPage(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.runtime.GCScheduleTask.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.tasks.SchedulerBaseTask.run(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper$TaskExecutionAction.run(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.security.Security.runAs(Security.java:41)
at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.weblogicLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.scheduler.core.quartz.QuartzWrapper.execute(Unknown Source)
at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:178)
at org.quartz.simpl.SimpleThreadPool$WorkerThread.run(SimpleThreadPool.java:477)
Caused by: com.thortech.xl.gc.exception.DBException: Attribute: ID_USUARIO does not exist in the specified parent table/view: ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.common.DBFacade.validateAttrExistence(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.common.DBFacade.getSchema(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.gc.impl.recon.DBReconTransportProvider.getSchema(Unknown Source)
... 11 more
WARN,05 Jan 2011 11:06:40,069,[XELLERATE.GC.FRAMEWORKRECONCILIATION],Though Reconciliation Scheduled task has encountered an error, Reconciliation Transport providers have been "ended" smoothly. Any provider operation that occurs during that "end" or "clean-up" phase would have been executed e.g. Data archival. In case you want that data to be a part of next Reconciliation execution, restore it from Staging. Provider logs must be containing details about storage entities that would have been archived.
The column ID_USUARIO exists in the ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST table.
Any idea?
Thanks

Hi Damian,
The parameters are the following:
Transport Provider = Database Application Tables Reconciliation
Format Provider = Database Application Tables Reconciliation
Trusted Source Reconciliation = Yes
Database Driver = oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
Database URL = jdbc:oracle:thin:@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:xxxx:xxxx
Database User ID = xxx
Database Password = ********
Customized Query =
Use Native Query = No
Connection Properties
Parent Table/View Name = ADM_PRIVIL.USERS_OIM_TEST
Child Table/View Names =
Unique Attribute = ID_USUARIO
Timestamp Attribute = fmodificacion
Database Date format =
Batch Size = All
Stop Reconciliation Threshold = 0.0
Stop Threshold Minimum Records = 0
Source Date Format = yyyy/MM/dd hh:mm:ss z
Reconcile Deletion of Multivalued Attribute Data = No
Reconciliation Type = Incremental
Thanks,
Ariel

VAT Reconciliation Problem with large number of transactions

Hi
We are experiencing problem when it comes to doing a Manual Internal Reconciliation for the VAT G/L account.
We have about 10,000 Output VAT transactions per month. So when we do a manual reconciliation for all these 10,000 credit entries against one debit entry SAP B1 resulted in "Out of Memory Error" or "Internal Error".
We are currently on SAP B1 2007A PL49.
The client system spec is Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2.0GHZ with 2GB memory.
Has any one come across the same issue before? Or SAP B1 cannot handle 10,000 transactions reconciliation due to limit in application?
BR,
Jimmy

For this kind of volume, you may have to do reconciliation more often to avoid error messages. I don't think this is application error but the limitation of all resources.
Thanks,
Gordon

OIM DB Application Table (for oracle 10g db) reconciliation problem

I want to reconcile my oracle database table into OIM. My table name in the db is called SD_EMPLOYEE and following is the fields.
     StaffID VARCHAR2(10),
     EmpID VARCHAR2(6),
     IDType VARCHAR2(20),
     IDNum VARCHAR2(20),
     EmpName VARCHAR2(255),
     EmpType VARCHAR2(20),
     EmpStatus VARCHAR2(10),
     LocID VARCHAR2(10),
     DeptID VARCHAR2(10),
     JobID VARCHAR2(10),
     JoinDate DATE,
     ConfirmedDate DATE,
     Confirmed VARCHAR2(2),
     ResignDate DATE,
     LoginID VARCHAR2(100),
     DomainName VARCHAR2(50),
     Email VARCHAR2(100),
     MobileNo VARCHAR2(10),
     ExtensionNo VARCHAR2(10),
     Xchange VARCHAR2(100),
     MovementType VARCHAR2(20),
     PrevMovementType VARCHAR2(20),
     MovementStatus VARCHAR2(10),
     MovementEffDate DATE,
     MovementDetail VARCHAR2(255)
However, I'm not sure how should I modify my oraApp2.xml file so that I can reconcile my SD_EMPLOYEE data into OIM and create the users. I'm not sure what it means by <xdb_app_map ... >.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xdb_app_map
xmlns:xsi = "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation = "file:///export/home/dbadp/xdb_app_map.xsd"
name = "OracleApp1">
<target_application>
<target_app_name>testapp1</target_app_name>
<target_app_ver>1.0</target_app_ver>
<target_app_provider>Wipro</target_app_provider>
</target_application>
<target_database>
<database name = "Oracle">
<properties>
<encryption_nego_level impl_class_name = "oracle.net.encryption_client" value = "REQUESTED"/>
<encryption_algorithm impl_class_name = "oracle.net.encryption_client" value = "DES40"/>
<crypto_seed impl_class_name = "oracle.net.crypto_seed" value = "xelsysadmin_seed"/>
<crypto_checksum_level impl_class_name = "oracle.net.crypto_checksum_client" value = "REQUIRED"/>
<crypto_checksum_client impl_class_name = "oracle.net.crypto_checksum_types_client" value = "MD5"/>
</properties>
</database>
</target_database>
<database_adapter>
<operation name = "create">
<task table_name = "MDL2_USER_PROF" xeltask_type = "insert">
<column
col_name = "USR_ID"
data_type = "VARCHAR2"
data_typ_size = "20"
col_info = "primary"
required = "true"
col_type = "xellerate"
xel_data_source = "xel_usr_id"/>
<column
col_name = "USR_FIRST_NAME"
data_type = "VARCHAR2"
data_typ_size = "60"
required = "true"
col_type = "xellerate"
xel_data_source = "xel_usr_first_name"/>
Anyone can help?

Hi Kevin,
Thanks for your info.
Just to make things clearer. Im doing a trusted recon. I have the below.
1) For the IT resource,
a) Application Name: this should be the same with the application name I put in the
XML file right? I have put it as testapp1.
b) Database user ID: this is the user which have the access to the table I want to
reconciled into OIM?
2) For resource object,
a) I'm currently using the "Database Application Resource" which has all predefined
fields like xel_usr_id. However, in the reconciliation action rules, I can't select the option of "create user" when "no matches found". Thus, can I use the "xellerate user" resource object for the DB Application Table connector?
3) Table to reconcile into OIM:
SD_Employee. The fields are EMPID, FNAME and LNAME.
In the OraApp2.xml file, I have the below:
<operation name = "create">
<task table_name = "DBRECON.SD_Employee" xeltask_type = "insert">
<column
col_name = "EMPID"
data_type = "VARCHAR2"
data_typ_size = "20"
col_info = "primary"
required = "true"
col_type = "xellerate"
xel_data_source = "xel_usr_id"/>
<column
col_name = "FNAME"
data_type = "VARCHAR2"
data_typ_size = "60"
required = "true"
col_type = "xellerate"
xel_data_source = "xel_usr_first_name"/>
<column
col_name = "LNAME"
data_type = "VARCHAR2"
data_typ_size = "60"
required = "true"
col_type = "xellerate"
xel_data_source = "xel_usr_last_name"/>
Am I doing the right thing here? As I still can't get the records in the SD_EMployee table to reconciled into OIM.
Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
GBHL

Partial Reconciliation - Problem with Search Filter

Hi All,
I'm trying to do a partial reconciliation and am getting this error:
INFO [ACTIVEDIRECTORY] ActiveDirectoryRecon/performReconciliation
INFO [ACTIVEDIRECTORY] Search Filter (&(&(objectclass=user)(whenChanged>=20100312190553.0Z))(((&((objectclass=user)())(sn=Test)))))
ERROR [ACTIVEDIRECTORY] Error during search : javax.naming.directory.InvalidSearchFilterException: Missing 'equals'; remaining name 'dc=dinghy,dc=hal,dc=test'
INFO [STDOUT] javax.naming.directory.InvalidSearchFilterException: Missing 'equals'; remaining name 'dc=dinghy,dc=hal,dc=test'
INFO [STDOUT] at com.sun.jndi.ldap.Filter.encodeSimpleFilter(Filter.java:305)
Missing equals??? This is what I entered as the query filter:
(&(objectclass=user)(sn=Test))
I just want to do it on a user whose last name is Test. I took the query straight out of the documentation.
I'm using an older adapter, 9.0.4, so they had me add this in the CustomizedReconQuery property of ITResource. The documentation also states:
The CustomizedReconQuery attribute is used in conjunction with the
isNativeQuery attribute. You use the isNativeQuery attribute to specify whether
or not the query condition is in the native format.
But I don't see a isNativeQuery property in either the ITResource or the Scheduled Task. I'm guessing that's not the issue anyway.
Anyone see any obvious issue I'm missing?
Thank you so much

I have a flat file recon process that I believe is my trusted source and this Updates or Creates OIM users. I just want only certain users to update to AD.. only ones where OIM.EmployeeID = AD.EmployeeID.
I got all the pieces together, except that all my OIM users have no EmployeeID, so I want to do a one time reconcliation from AD to get the AD.EmployeeID property into OIM.
Since my ProcessForm's Employee ID field is being populated correctly from Reconciliation, I thought I could take that value and put it in the User form with a "Employee ID Updated" task, but that, for some reason, doesn't trigger as an update from Reconciliation, works when I click Save tho. I guess it's not meant to work that way.
I've never heard of Entity Adapters, but I'll look into it now.
Thanks much
Alex
EDIT - OK, so I see Entity is a type of Adapter.... how do I call this adapter? Do I make a process task that calls it? Do I do it as above and name it "MYFILED Updated", or do something else?
Edited by: alecks29 on Mar 17, 2010 3:04 PM

Manual Reconciliation problem

Dear Experts,
I am a bit lost here, one of our employee is doing manual reconciliation (via Banking >Bank Statements and External Reconciliation > Manual Reconciliation). as per the employee one time she saved the recon she was doing and when she returned and checked again the recon was not saved, this only happened on one GL account. anyone who had the same experience and what mostly the cause of this?
your feedbacks and answers are greatly appreciated.

Hi,
1. Check your communication link for note, but it is not for your version. But you have to check reason that stated in symptom.
2. Refer thread for S-user ID--http://scn.sap.com/thread/3362801
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Bank Reconciliation problem

Dear Friends,
We uploaded the manual bank statment . But for the bank statments the clearing document is not updated in the system.
Please suggest what might be the problem
Regards
Babu

confirm it has posted.
check the posting rules, should all line items be cleared? Some may not be.
You may have a posting rule that does not clear.
Check the overview of the bank statement confirms that all of the line items have posted correctly.
You may have a batch session that needs processing.
Hope this helps.
Award points if useful.

Email Reconciliation problems !!!

When I go to options under messages and it shows -
general options
email settings
email reconciliation
spell check
Then when I enter "email reconciliation" no options appear. And as far as I know that is the only place I can change the email deleting options
thanks for your help

When I go to options under messages and it shows -
general options
email settings
email reconciliation
spell check
Then when I enter "email reconciliation" no options appear. And as far as I know that is the only place I can change the email deleting options
thanks for your help

Reconciliation problem in J1IFQ

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for