Reconnecting for Higher Resolution

Hi
I'm working on a project in which the film has been scanned in as an Apple Pro Res file, 1920 x 1080
I've edited the entire thing, thinking my settings were in HD, but it turns out I've edited the video as 720 x 480 (yeah I know, dumb thing not to notice)
I've tried looking around at any tutorials for reconnecting media, hoping that it would read the HD file and make my edited timeline HD
I've made a new timeline with HD settings, and copied my 720 timeline into that. The videos are now very small on the screen. I could always physically drag the video and make it bigger, but I'd be afraid if I exported that as 1080, it would drastically lose the quality.
Is there anyone who can help with what I'm trying to do, and have FCP detect all the in/outs of the original 1080 file, and match them with the 720-video on my now-1080 timeline?
I apologize if that got confusing at any point I feel like I repeated myself
Message was edited by: Book1245

HI -
On the copy sequence you made, click on the timeline and type Command + A to select all your clips.
Then control click on any one of the selected clips and from the drop down menu, select Remove Attributes. From the Remove Attributes window that opens select Basic Motion and Distort (if it is bold and clickable), then click OK.
Your clips should now resize themselves to the correct size, if you have set the sequence settings correctly.
Hope this helps.
MtD
Message was edited by: Meg The Dog to fix typo

Similar Messages

  • Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?

    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling for high resolution monitors in their preferences panel but Bridge CC does not, when will this feature be added to Bridge CC Adobe???

    qsea wrote:
    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
    Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
    The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types.  The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
    The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

  • Panel not resizing for high-resolution monitors

    Received this in an email from a person using an HTML5 panel:  "What I'm seeing on a high resolution monitor (3840x2160) is that the panel doesn't resize to fit its container."
    The container for the panel is appears to have scaled up, but the panel itself is tiny within this container.
    The pixel dimensions on which the panel was built (and what's coded into the HTML for the panel) makes the panel the correct size on "normal" monitors, but it doesn't appear to up rez for high-resolution monitors.  The user can scale the rest of Photoshop's menus and panels using some interface in the OS, but the panel doesn't scale.
    Anyone have any thoughts on this weather or not it's possible to get panels to up-rez for high-resolution monitors?
    Thanks.

    qsea wrote:
    Why is there no scaling for high resolution monitors in Adobe Bridge CC?
    Photoshop CC, Illustrator CC and Indesign CC have 200% scaling…
    Inconsistency between or among applications in the artificial "suites" should come as no surprise.
    The "suite" concept is a fabrication of Adobe marketing and bean-counting types.  The engineering teams are totally independent of each other, they are not only in different buildings but in different cities and states of the American Union, even in different countries.
    The fact that they have little if any communication among them is highlighted by requests occasionally made in these forums by top Adobe engineers to let the other teams know when there are problems in one application that impact our workflow in another one.

  • Make Skype work properly with Windows DPI scaling for high resolution displays

    Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!

    pokegwa wrote:
    Hello, As of now, Skype does not work well with Windows DPI scaling. Everything looks fuzzy (fonts, icons, etc).Microsoft's recommendation is to turn off the DPI scaling ( http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2900023 ) but in this case, the text is too tiny to be read. Basically everyone with a high resolution display is stuck with either tiny of fuzzy fonts, making Skype unusable. It's really a pity because other Microsoft programs such as Office work perfectly with Windows DPI scaling, and Skype also looks great on Mac with Retina display. With high DPI displays becoming more and more common, this is a must have feature. Thanks for reading!It's been two years actually. As you can see Skype is really broken on HDPI displays and the issue is still being ignored/unacknowledged by Skype devs.

  • Support for higher resolution on iPad?

    I realise the latest 1.2 release increased the maximum resolution supported to 2048x2048 at the expense of the number of layers supported.
    Are there any plans to extend this further, even if it only means supported say 4 layers? Most of my image editing apps (iPhoto, FilterStorm, Photogene etc.) can support my Nikon 12.2MP images without reduction and output at the full size so it seems this is still a limitation with Photoshop Touch which can only support a 3rd of this resolution.

    AndyWhiteford wrote:
    I'm fine with how Adobe hace approached this. My point is I have managed to edit full 12MP images on the iPad in these other apps and output at full size without any issues at all. I appreciate the image size will have a direct impact on the layers supported due to the limitations of available RAM but even if they limited it to 2 layers, you would at least have the choice of being able to edit these images in Photoshop Touch. Even if they disabled layers entirely for large images, it would still be a benefit being able to use this application to edit images as opposed to switching to different apps depending on the task at hand.
    The point I'm trying to hammer home to anyone reading this is to realize the limitations tablets currently have. Sure, you might be OK with being only to edit a few layers when using a higher resolution but are others? Do they even know their tablets' specs? (I bet most don't even know the memory capacity their tablets have.)

  • Increase After Effects System text for high resolution monitor

    I just purchased a high resolution monitor.  The panels and system text (rendering queue, project panel, etc.) in After Effects is now just about microscopic.
    Is there anyway to adjust the default text size on all the panels?

    No, unfortunately not. This stuff is part of Adobe's specific UI libraries and cannot be changed. The main application menu should respect your settings though, as should file dialogs and a few text input fields, if that's any consolation. If possible, simply define a user preset in your graphics card settings that switches screeen resolution and system dpi when launching AE or any other Adobe app. Good monitors have good scaling chips, so it should not look all too shabby and you can always go back full res for pixel precision when needed...
    Mylenium

  • Performance Lag for higher resolution

    I have developed a touch based flash application with a resolution of 5120x1440.
    There is performance lag in two areas.
    1) FPS is low (below 33) and Graphic lag is high (sometimes hitting > 80 ms)
    2) Touch response is slow (using touchlib)
    I'm using a PC of the following specs.
    CPU: Intel i7-4770 3.4GHz
    RAM: Kingston 8GB
    Motherboard: Gigabyte Z87X-OC
    GPU: 4x Gigabyte Geforce GT630 2GB
    PSU: 1000W
    Currently, the GPU Load is hitting at most 20% and the CPU usage is most of time below 50%. If I keep invoking the touch events, the app will ocassionally freeze and GPU Load drops to 0% for a while before coming back to normal and app becomes responsive again.
    Is there a hardware compatilbility issue? Is there any way to improve on the touch responsiveness?
    Thanks...

    If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
    monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
    full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
    also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
    sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
    (the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
    so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
    with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
    and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
    one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
    be able to sync things up.
    This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
    kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
    you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
    one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
    not work.
    You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
    Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
    technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
    another (expensive) pieces of software.

  • QuickTime SDK for Windows ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame crashes for higher resolution cameras  2 MP

    I implemented a while ago a H.264 re-encoding to output H.264 QuickTime .mov file usng QuickTime Window SDK  7.3.0.70. The code uses ICMCompressionSession to compress the frames going into the container. The code works fine with cameras with resolutions up to 2 Megapixels (1600 x 1200). The crash occurs in QuickTime API call. Here is the code to compress the frame:
    CVPixelBufferRef pixel_buffer = nil;
    int nWidth = (**pixMap).bounds.right - (**pixMap).bounds.left;
    int nHeight = (**pixMap).bounds.bottom - (**pixMap).bounds.top;
    CVReturn ret =
    CVPixelBufferCreateWithBytes(kCFAllocatorDefault,
                                 nWidth,
                                 nHeight,
                                 k24RGBPixelFormat,
                                 GetPixBaseAddr(pixMap),
                                 3 * nWidth,
                                 NULL,
                                 NULL,
                                 NULL,
                                 &pixel_buffer);
    //.....code ommitted for clarity
    // set image data into the pixel buffer
    CVPixelBufferLockBaseAddress( pixel_buffer, 0 );
    // Feed the frame to the compression session.
    m_OSerr = ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame( compressionSession, pixel_buffer,
            displayTimeMsecs, displayDurationMsecs, validTimeFlags,
            frameOptions, NULL, NULL );
    //unlock the pixels
    CVPixelBufferUnlockBaseAddress( pixel_buffer, 0 );
    CVPixelBufferRelease(pixel_buffer);
    The call to ICMCompressionSessionEncodeFrame fails either  with
    1. Error code -108
    memFullErr = -108, /*Not enough room in heap zone*/
    OR
    2. An access violation QuickTimeH264.qtx!6782522d()
    [Frames below may be incorrect and/or missing, no symbols loaded for QuickTimeH264.qtx]
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6782529a()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!676c7a13()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777467b()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!676ac709()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777abbe()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!6777ac1a()
    QuickTimeH264.qtx!67698aa1()
    kernel32.dll!@BaseThreadInitThunk@12() + 0x12 bytes
    ntdll.dll!___RtlUserThreadStart@8() + 0x27 bytes
    ntdll.dll!__RtlUserThreadStart@8() + 0x1b bytes
    Has anyone encountered the same problem and if so what was the resolution?

    i suspect its a weak psu ,can you run any thing stresses the vga card under linux

  • Flash for higher resolution displays

    Newbie here (using CS3 Professional...just completed first
    basic tutorial). I've been searching Adobe documents and this
    forum, but haven't found an answer to my question. I'm wanting to
    use flash for a tradeshow digital signage application and I need my
    PC to output a flash movie at a resolution of 4080x768. An external
    Matrox card will divide that resolution over three LCD flat-panel
    displays. I learned that Flash's max stage size is 2880 pixels
    either horizontal or vertical. Any workarounds? or is this even
    do-able?
    Thanks!

    If the computer recognized the three monitors as three
    monitors, and not one really wide monitor, then you could run three
    full screen flash programs at the same time, one on each screen,
    also syncing them with localConnection. It could be pretty easy to
    sync content if you created a movie clip to hold all your animation
    (the movie clip can be 4080 px wide) and then animated everything
    so that a very wide clip had the entire animation. Then use a stage
    with a width of 1360 and move this clip to x positions 0, -1360,
    and -2720, each time saving the movie and publishing. If you have
    one that sends localConnection cues to the others, then it should
    be able to sync things up.
    This is much easier said than done of course, as I dunno what
    kind of content you're running, audio, video, etc. Plus, I think
    you're dealing with a situation where you have a computer that sees
    one big screen and not 3 smaller ones, so the second solution might
    not work.
    You could try a similar thing and drop all of them in a
    Director shell, which will do 4080 pixels wide, and use the same
    technique, but that could be a big performance hit, and it adds
    another (expensive) pieces of software.

  • I want to buy high resolution mu

    I made a search on this before posting but didn't find what I was looking for. I bought the Audigy 4 a while back and really enjoy the performance and quality. When I bought this sound card it came with a DVD 24 bit music sampler. I've been shopping on the web and in?stores for high resolution music (24 bit, or "aiff" format)?and can't believe I have found none. Is it me?not looking at the right place or is this not available on the market yet?thanks?

    The only "hi def" music you'll find will be super audio CD's and DVD audio "CD's". I doubt you will find anything in an uncompressed format online as that would take up way too much storage space and bandwidth.
    SACD's are "better" because they offer an enormously high sample rate. 2.xxx MHz, I can't remember the exact rate. It also has a bit rate of only . DVD "CD's" (which aren't CD's at all) can hold more data, so the songs can be recorded in a much higher sample rate over conventional CD's. You won't, however, be able to play them on normal CD players, and it would be impracticable to rip them to your computer.

  • Hp2311x higher resolution with Acer Aspire TC-105

    Hello
    I have a new Acer Aspire TC-105 purchased, now do the following problem that my screen resolution can not be higher than 1366 x 768. In my previous PC had to choose. No problem for higher resolution
    I have the latest drivers geeinstalleerd, I get the message C: \ Monitors \ HP_2311_3.0 \ HPX64DRIVE.EXE access denied
    I press ok
    He just goes to the HP installer I press following normal message, click finish then nothing happens with my display adapters. The only thing I see is the Compaq W185q Wide LCD Monitor that's not him, and I can not select him for another montitor the HP2311x
    Higher resolution will be nice.
    What am I doing wrong
    Goos Mante

    Since you are reverting the patch, you need to indicate that the patch should be reversed on the command line. So if you saved the patch from git as constrain-cursor-harder.patch, for instance, you would need to modify the PKGBUILD so that:
    constrain-cursor-harder.patch is in the source array
    The patch's md5sum is in the md5sums array
    The patch command line specifies that it's a reverse patch (the -R is important):
    patch -RNp1 -i "${srcdir}/constrain-cursor-harder.patch"
    Unfortunately, the patch from git no longer reverses cleanly against xorg-server 1.11.4.
    I've made an updated version of the patch that should apply cleanly, without a need to be reversed, here: http://moe.isisview.org/patches/xorg-se … rder.patch

  • Does iPhoto '11 post to Facebook in High Resolution?

    Does iPhoto '11 post to Facebook using its new High Resolution feature?
    (I haven't bought '11 yet so I can't test it myself.)

    In my test, yes a larger file was uploaded. However, if you call this "high resolution" when it's still compressed smaller than it was, and almost all the metadata - including colour information is stripped out - then you've a pretty low setting for "high" resolution. Put it this way, it will still print very poorly.
    FWIW, I had none of the issues described above.
    Regards
    TD

  • When will Muse work with high resolution systems?

    I just upgraded my PC to a Yoga 3, pushing an ASUS 2560x1440 monitor. After a new download/install, launching Muse on either the laptop's screen (3K) or the monitor results in the GUI's menus and commands being so tiny they are unusable. So far, Muse is the only application that I'm seeing this with. MS Office, browsers, and numerous other programs all work fine.
    When I contacted support, they said "Muse isn't ready for high resolution systems," and had me drop the resolution down to "fix" the issue. Not what I spent all this money to do.
    When I asked when Muse would be ready, they recommended that I post that question for the community. So here I am.
    This all seems odd to me, because my old machine was a MacBook pro with retina display and the same monitor - Muse worked just fine there.
    Question posted.

    The simple and only really honest answer is: When it's ready. Adobe never makes and "let's look into the crystal ball" statements about its software.
    Mylenium

  • Possible to pull higher resolution single frames from movie?

    Hi.
    I am currently using iMovie HD 6. I am wondering if it is possible to pull a higher than 72 dpi frame for still picture purposes? Command "F" doesn't seem to give options for higher resolution.
    Would moving to Final Cut Express give more still picture options?
    Any ideas welcome.
    Thanks for any replies in advance.
    Thomas

    Images in video are defined by their pixel dimensions, for example -NTSC DV is 720x480 non square pixels - which is the square pixel equivalent of 640x480. It really doesn't matter if this is output at 72dpi or 300dpi as it is still 720x480. You get what the camera recorded - no more.
    If you need higher quality images (ie more pixels) take still images on the set. Even throw away point and shoot cameras will record an image with more pixels than any video format.
    good luck.
    x

  • How do I upload to Facebook in High Resolution using my iPhone. Do I need an app? Which ones are best for the job? (I know how to do it on a PC :) )

    How do I upload photos to Facebook in High Resolution using my iPhone. Do I need an app? Which ones are best for the job? (I know how to do it on a PC )

    100pat wrote:
    Thanks, I can do it fine from my Windows desktop PC, I just want to know how to do it from an iPhone4
    Like I said before ask facebook or look at their support site to see if that is even a feature.

Maybe you are looking for