Reconstruction for FI doc after derivation rule change

Hi SAPers,
My client needs to change the derivation rule for year end. For PR and PO reconstruction, i understand that we can use RFFMRP34N and RFFMRP02N.
What is the procedure to reconstruct FI document to update FM based on latest FMDERIVE? If i understand correctly on the message, we need to delete old dataset (RFFMDL02) and then run RFFMRP20, then finish by executing BPINDX03. Is my understanding correctly or is there any other thing that i need to check?
Thanks a lot for replying.
EG

Hi Mar,
I might be wrong, but if i only execute FMN0, the accounting document from GR of PO still goes to the commitment item on PO. Below is the steps that i performed:
1. Post PR, PO, GR using commitment item X.
2. Change the derivation rule to commitment item Y.
3. Delete Actual data using (RFFMDLFI).
4. Run Supplementary Account Assignment using FMCN, and convert it. This updated the commitment item Y in the GR document.
5. Run S_ALR_87012637 - Totals Records for FI Documents to see whether FMCN updates FM, and i can see that the GR document that i deleted still missing in FM.
6. Run FMBV, but report FMRP_RFFMAV01X - Annual Budget still does not show changes, and the document is still missing.
6. Run FMN0, and put the document number.
7. Run S_ALR_87012637 - Totals Records for FI Documents again, and the GR document is updated
8. Run report FMRP_RFFMAV01X - Annual Budget, but apparently, even though the commitment item has changed to Y, it updates at commitment item X.
9. Run FMBV again to reconstruct the assignment, and no changes.
Then i tried another way.
1. I deleted PO commitment data (RFFMDLOI).
2. I and reconstruct PO again using FMN4N.
3. I run FMN0 using the GR document as reference.
4. I run report FMRP_RFFMAV01X - Annual Budget, and i can see that the assignment is correct.
Did i miss something, or this is what we should do if we have FM data from GR or Invoice?
Thanks a lot for the explanation.
CW

Similar Messages

Function module for to Create fund/Grant management Derivation rules

Hi All,
Is there any function module for to create a derivation rules for fund/Grant management.
Thanks in Advance.
Nara.

Hi,
Please try with FM KED0_CREATE_DERIVATION_TABLE
Please let me know if you have some issues,
Regards,
Lijo Joseph
*Assign Points ifuseful.

Number range for miro doc

Hi,
can anyone pls provide the full details abt how to define number range for miro documnets and which doc type , should be used for miro doc.

hi,
USe OMR4(change view document type invoice verification/valuation)
Go to SPRO --> MM --> Logistics Invoice Verification --> Incoming Invoice --> Number Assignment --> Maintain Number Assignment for Logistics Documents --> Transaction ---> Assign Number Range & Maintain Number Range Intervals for Invoice Documents ....here maintain the number range
thanks
katrina

Deleting derivation rule for the existing characteristic in operating conce

Hi all
My customer has two characteristics" Billing Doc(VBELN)" and" Warranty status" in the development and testing client and not in the production now.
Option 1 : Is to delete them but as the data is already posted for the same in the test and development client,it is lot more complex( involves implementation of OSS notes-SAPNET note 21207) .
Option 2: If we decide to keep them for now:These two have a derivation rules too. So can we simply delete the derivation rules so that data will not get posted to them( So will not effect the PSG i.e ce4xxxx table in production once the same transport is moved to production). There are no dependencies on this derivation rule.
Option 3: Can we also remove them from segment level characteristics?
Please let me know pros and cons ?
I really appreciate your time and effort.
Thanks & Regards
Sri

Hi,
If the characteristics have not been transported to production then why don't you delete them in the dev/test system ? Here you can take the risk.
To delete characteristics or value fields, perform the following
activities:
1. Delete the corresponding characteristics and value fields from Customizing in all clients (this includes forms, reports, planning
layouts, and so forth). To locate characteristics and value fields, use the appropriate where-used list in the Customizing Monitor. You can access it by choosing Tools -> Analysis -> Check Customizing Settings (TA KECM).
You can jump directly from the where-used list to the relevant Customizing transaction and then delete the appropriate field there.
2. Switch to the screen for maintaining the data structure of an operating concern (Maintain operating concern).
3. If you need to effect other changes to the datastucture for the operating concern before making any deletions, effect those changes and save the data structure.
4. In order to be able to select the fields of the data structure, choose Extras -> Characteristics (or Value fields) -> Unlock.
5. Select the characteristics and value fields to be deleted and remove them from the data structure with the "Reset fields" function.
6. Reactivate the operating concern. The system starts by checking whether the operating concern contains any data and whether the fields to be deleted are still being used in any Customizing settings.
7. If none of the fields are still in use, the system then starts the re-activation. If the operating concern does not contain any data or does not require the database system to be converted, the tables are activated. You are then able to activate the environment for the operating concern. In this case, the following activities no longer apply.
If the operating concern already contains data, a system message tells you that the database needs to be converted. If you proceed, an activation log appears (at the top of the list).
8. Analyze the activation log. If it only contains error messages telling you to convert the tables, proceed with the next activity.
You must otherwise remove the cause of the errors before the tables can be converted. In this case, you should answer "No" to the next prompt, which asks whether the conversion transaction should start.
9. If you still only receive error messages telling you to convert the tables, choose "Back" and start the conversion.
10. Plan a job for the conversion. A list of the tables to be converted is shown for this. If the tables only contain a small amount of data (less than 10 000 records), then all the tables can be converted in one job. In that case, you can select all the tables.
For larger tables, conversion should take place in several jobs.
However, you should ensure that table CE4xxxx (where xxxx = operating concern) is the last table to be converted.
Warning. No other changes can be made to the operating concern during the conversion.
A copy of the table is generated during the conversion. The database system should have sufficient memory available for this copy.
To schedule conversion as a job, use the "Schedule selections" function.
You can display the current status of the conversion by selecting the "Refresh" icon. Tables disappear from the list once they have been converted sucessfully. If a conversion is taking a while, it is also possible to leave the transaction. You can then continue the conversion using DB requests -> Mass processing in one of the following ways:
With the job overview. You access this by choosing System -> Services ->Jobs.
Using the database utility transaction. You access this by choosing Utilities -> Database Utility in the ABAP Dictionary menu.
You can use the status function to call up the status of the operating concern during operating concern maintenance. You need to activate all tables after conversion.
11. To analyze errors that have occurred during the conversion, you can use the database utility transaction by choosing Extras -> Logs. The log has the same name as the conversion job: TBATG-date. You can also restart the conversion with this transaction.
For more information on the database utility, choose Help -> Application help while still in the above transaction.
12. Once you have activated all the tables in the operating concern, generate the operating concern environment from within operating concern maintenance.
You can then use the operating concern again.
Please, refer to the IMG documentation under Controlling ->Profitability Analysis -> Structures -> Define operating concern
-> Maintain operating concern, for further details.
regards
Waman

Copa derivation rule not working for Discount GL

Hi All,
Kindly note that I have a distribution rule where company & plant combination is used where condtion is that customer group 3 should be 018 and then replace distribution channel to 03.However the rule is not working for discount GL posted in the billing document.
I tried testing it in FB50 but then it does not allows me to enter plant and because of that derivation rule fails. However in my billing doc I do see a plant against discount GL and still the rule is not getting picked.
I had raised this issue earlier but the reply where not as expected and so I have rephraised my question.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards
Pranay

Hi Pranay
I could not understand your req to a great detail, following are my observations
1. There should be derivation rule in place 1st of all to derive customer group from billing doc...
Check if Cust Group is populated in your COPA doc or not.. For this cust group should be a segment level char in KEQ3
2. Create a derivation rule using method "Derivation".
Source fields would be Cust Group, Plant and Company code ( I guess you want to change dist channel with this combination)
Target field would be VTWEG (Dist Channel)....Click on the magnifying lens beside VTWEG and choose relevant radio button "Overwrite if ......."
CLick on RULE VALUES and maintain the required Values there
This should work...
Regards
Ajay M

Copa derivation rule for customer group

Hi All,
I am currently facing an issue with Derivation rule and hope someone can help me on resolving this.I have created a COPA derivation rule which has field as
Source Field
company code
Plant
Target field
Distribution channel
Condition
customer group 3 = 18.
so ideally with this conbination the distribtion channel gets updated
for the sales order.
However the issue we are facing is that the rule is working for only 1st line item and not for the others. I have also kept setting as" overwrite values only if new values found"
e.g if we see the accounting doc of billing then
line item 1 customer: x
line item 2 SaLes GL: rule works fine and dist channel is updated.
line item 3 discount GL: rule does not work.
Have checked the derivation rule and it looks correct.
Can you kindly suggest solution to this.

Hi Ajay,
Thank you so much for your reply.Please note that the GL is a cost element but the category in system is 1 and not 12.However I would like understand as to why is this happening.why does the system picks up derviation rule for a Gross sales GL and not for Discount GL(Cost element).
The distribution channel gets updated for sales GL when i check the prof segment of the line item, however this is not the case with doscount GL.
I would like to understnad the implication before changing cost element category from 1 to 12 as it runs across system.
Kindly provide some more explaination.
thanks in advance.

Transport Problem - for KEDR Derivation rule

We are trying to create derivation rule through transaction KEDR without any values. After creating derivation rule, it is creating workbench transport request eventhough K9RE* table is client dependent.
We have different transport routes/groups for customizing and workbench. SAP Layer is assinged to workbench transport group with one another Z* layer.
When we are trying to create request it is creating workbench transport request eventhough it is client dependent. It is using KEG0 package which is assinged to SAP layer.
Workbench transport are not going to all clients and we have to move request manually to other clients.
What should we do for changing this behaviour?
Thanks,
Miral.

With detailed explanation:
I thing previous post with was not detailed enough. Please see below.
We have created two different transport group for differentiating
customizing and workbench transport request.
ZECD layer is assigned to /CUST/ group where as ZWBK and SAP layer is
assinged to /WRKB/ group.
We are moving all client independent transports (assigned to /WRKB/
group) to only 1 client in other systems.
While creating derivation rule through transaction KEDR, it is not
allowing us to assing /CUST/ group eventhough config is client dependent.
It is using package KEG0 which is assinged to SAP layer and SAP layer isassinged to /WRKB/ group in our configuration.
The Derivation rule config is client dependent eventhough it is creatingworkbench request. We would like to know why it is creating workbench
request instead of customizing request.
Thanks,
Miral.

Change in Derivation rule in fund managemet

Hi Gurus
If i change derivation rule for fund center to cost center in between of fiscal year. will it make any impact on existing PO.
please give me your valuable input.
Regards
Shiv

Hi Shiv,
If I understood you well you want to know if one assignment bettwen funds center and cost center change if the PO will be automatically updated to the new assignment or not.
The answer is no and you can find all the hints in the following note:
658163 Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
If you want that the PO will be changed to the new assignment, the note provides also some workarounds that will allow you to do this.
I hope it helps you
Best Regards,
Vanessa Barth.

Derivation rule for budgeting

is it possible to have a derivation rule where we can define for budgeting purpose that if we are using a particular cost center we could use only a particular commitment code only.
viewers please leave your hints/remarks so that any help could be received

How to change fund managment period from existing (APRIL TO MARCH)    TO OCT TO SEPTEMBER.
WE ARE TRYING TO CHANGE THAT USING
                 public cector mgmt
                                 fund mgmnt govt
                                               basic setting
                                                         fiscal year setting
                                                                     define fiscal year setting
there we have                       v3 as    april to march and
                                           v9 as    oct to sept
originally we had assigned v3 to Financial year and   to fund mgmt period both.
             but now we want to assign v9 to fund mgmt period.
But system is not allowing us to do that. How can we achive it and what are the reasons for errors

COPA derivation rule for GL fields

we are using Transaction type (BSEG_BEWAR) to store additional information for our Sales reporting. During the GL entry this field is update. I have created Derivation rule in COPA using table look up. The table I am using is BSEG. I have characteristics defined for Transaction type- WWTTY.
when the table lookup is populated I get following fields in source as target :
BSEG -
> BUKRS                                COPA --> BUKRS
BSEG -
> BELNR                               COPA -
> BELNR
BSEG -
> GJAHR                              COPA ---> GJAHR
BSEG -
> BUZEI                               COPA -
> WWDOC ( This is custom defined in COPA)
Assignment of Target Fields:
BSEG ---> BEWAR                                COPA -
WWDOC
Still I am in seeing COPA getting updated with Transaction type value.
Need input to solve this issue.
Thanks in advance

Hi Ajay,
Thank you so much for your reply.Please note that the GL is a cost element but the category in system is 1 and not 12.However I would like understand as to why is this happening.why does the system picks up derviation rule for a Gross sales GL and not for Discount GL(Cost element).
The distribution channel gets updated for sales GL when i check the prof segment of the line item, however this is not the case with doscount GL.
I would like to understnad the implication before changing cost element category from 1 to 12 as it runs across system.
Kindly provide some more explaination.
thanks in advance.

Derivation Rule for Partner Function

Dear Experts
I have some questions about COPA derivation rule.
I attempted to input a number for remark by using the partner function u201Ccontactu201D field in biling table (KNVP-PANRN).
Itu2019s always occurred error while SD entered PGI after I configuring the derivation rules.
My derivation rules as following:
Source Fields
KNVP     KUNNR     >>CO-PA     KNDNR
KNVP     VKORG     >>CO-PA     VKORG
KNVP     VTWEG     >>CO-PA     VTWEG
KNVP     SPART     >>CO-PA     SPART
KNVP     PARVW     >>GLOBAL USERTEMP3 (use MOVE for constant=CP in last step)
KNVP     PARZA     >>GLOBAL USERTEMP4 (use MOVE for constant=000 in last step)
Target Fields
KNVP    PARNR >>CO-PA WW001
Seems probably have some problems.
Could Experts give me a hint?

Problem solved.
I just set my constant numbers wrong.

Derivation Rule Problem After A Client Copy

Hello,
Has anyone ever encountered a problem with derivation rules after a client copy is performed? After a client copy, we have "some" FM and GM derivation rules (not all of them) that have to be manually copied from the source to the target client (line by line by line by line). I'm thinking that there has to be a way to prevent this since some rules are fine after the clent copy. Your input would be greatly appreciated.
Will

I believe that we have resoved our issue. For the derivation rule values that would never copy, we re-created these again starting in DEV and transported the derivation rules throughout the entire landscape (QAS and PRD). Evidently some derivation rules (and the related values stored in the tables) were created directly in Production. During a client copy the values in the tables for the derivation rules that were created directly in our Production environment would not copy to our QAS environment. Those rules were stored in a table named FMFMOAPRD1000122. Note that PRD is in the table name. After re-creating the rule and transporting it through the landscape, the table was named FMFMOADEV1000152 (for example).

How to make signature field work for reader users? Security settings change when doc is extended???

I've been struggling to correct a problem all week and am at my wits end. Customer service was no help as the person I spoke with could barely speak english let alone understand the problem as I explained it to him. Hoping someone here can provide some insight, here's the issue:
I'm using a Windows 7 Professional OS. I created a Microsoft Word doc and used Adobe Acrobat XI Standard to create a form from it. It automatically detected the fields, which includes a signature field. I went through fixed it all up how it needed to be and did "save as other - reader extended pdf - enable forms fill in & save in reader".
The document is a report that will be sent to a small number of people that have to fill it out, digitally sign and return and I'm assuming that most if not all of them will open the document using the free Adobe Reader. So I thought extending it is what I needed to do to make sure they could fill it out, save it to their computer if need be, and also sign digitally. The signature field was automatically added in by acrobat for me and I did not change the properties of it at all except to add a border.
When I open the form in Reader (also XI) I can fill out all the fields, save it... but not sign it. The security settings say signing is not allowed even though I went back to the original pdf form and the security settings on it say allowed for everything. I don't know how to fix this... please help!!!
I've attached some screen shots but can include more if needed...

I don't have the Enable More Tools option under Reader Extended PDF. I just tried to download the XI Pro trial version and it won't complete installation because of the standard version I already have. Any advice or workarounds you know of? Going to the boss for $$ to upgrade to Pro is what I'll consider my last resort if the issue is truly that I have to use Pro to enable more tools for reader.... I appreciate your reply though. I sat here all day yesterday fingers crossed that SOMEONE would give it a go!

My itunes library was on my PC. About two years ago I switched it to my Seagate server/hardrive. (itunes-preferences-advanced-change library). Last summer (2012) I bought a macbook, which seems to access the seagate server hard drive fine for word docs,

My itunes library was on my PC. About two years ago I switched it to my Seagate server/hardrive. (itunes-preferences-advanced-change library). Last summer (2012) I bought a macbook, which seems to access the seagate server hard drive fine for word docs, excel spreadsheets,etc. It also seems to have started its own library which is not complete. My PC died this summer (I still have it though).
Now when syncing any of the multiple devices (ipods,ipads, iphones) that we have with my mac book, itunes states that "an error occurred" or the "app cannot be found". Itunes wants me to erase the device and sync with my macbook. The message "The iPhone “Renee’s iPhone” is synced with another iTunes library on “Renee PC”. Do you want to erase this iPhone and sync with this iTunes library? An iPhone can be synced with only one iTunes library at a time. Erasing and syncing replaces the contents of this iPhone with the contents of this iTunes library."appears.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Renee

u can give try to using external enclosre and backup ur files. I hope u will get files back. or using external enclosre with ur hdd boot into Linux and try to mount ur harddisk.
there are multiple no of tutorial to mount apple partion in Linux.

I have had a trial version of Acrobat X1 Pro - I have decided not to buy at this stage - for some time it has been conflicting with opening PDF docs after saving as from word 2007 - I uninstalled Pro X1 and now when I save as from word 2007 to PDF it will

Can anyone help with this - do I have to uninstall Reader and then reinstall?

I have had a trial version of Acrobat X1 Pro - I have decided not to buy at this stage - for some time it has been conflicting with opening PDF docs after "saving as" from word 2007 - I uninstalled Pro X1 and now when I "save as" PDF from word 2007 to PDF it will save the document as a PDF but will not open the document to display after publishing - I have to got to where the file has been saved to view the new PDF document - this is really annoying - do I have to delete adobe reader and reinstall it - adobe needs to look at this conflict with acrobat pro as I have even gone it to properties and tried to have adobe reader as the default PDF program - the main issue is that I cannot view the PDF after publishing it from word 2007

Reconstruction for FI doc after derivation rule change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for