Recording Failure
I recently got a pace tds850nb sky hd box but every time i record or download something it keeps on saying failed and if i record 2 programmes on 1 channel it will say "No Satellite Signal Is Being Recieved" i Dont Know if this is a software problem or what the details are as followedModel Number: R003.047.25.00PVersion Number: 9F3002Serial Number: 0289318203Viewing Card Number: N/AOperating System Version: R003.047.25.00PEpg Software Version: 47.0.16.1Manufacturer: PaceThe Software is out of date i know that i keep on doing a forced software update but it stays the same i need help i dont know what to do
JeanMWood48 wrote:
.........The Software is out of date i know that i keep on doing a forced software update but it stays the same i need help i dont know what to do......Yes, the software is out of date. Just make sure you are following the correct update procedure which is under Sky+HD box, paragraph 3 Download the Sky+HD box software which you can find here .
Similar Messages
-
Is there any way of establishing whether a recording has worked fully? I startd to watch something last night and after 5 minutes the recording stopped. There were no indicators on the menu screen to indicate a recording failure.
Solved!
Go to Solution.Thanks. Perhaps I just missed that. I guess it's worth checking each time a programme has been recorded, especially if you aren't going to get around to watching it for a while - dependning on what it is, there's always the catch-up route as a backup.
-
Hi all,
I have seen update record failures in sm13 with error, what should i do first?
kind regards,
praveenHi Praveen,
Follow the below steps to avoid data inconsistency in production environment,
1. In SM13, check whether the `Update is in active` status , if yes, then the problem is with certain user action. If not, check the table space status. whether any table space has reached 100%. If the table space has reached full , extend the table space and change the update to active. SAP will automatically change the status to inactive if any of the table space reaches 100%, this is to avoid inconsistency.
2. If it is not related to table space problem, check the failed update error. if you double click on that error, you will get the detailed error report..where it got failed and in which transaction it happened etc.
Normally, update errors are to be handled with coordination from Func and end user. Find out which user action has triggered this update error etc. Ask your func team to check if there is any business impact due to this error ( due to missing document etc). if there is any, ask your func team to analyze the situation and repost the failed document.
Once the business impact is fixed, ask your func team to search for any notes available in OSS for that particular transaction which caused the update error. in general, there will be some corrections or SAP will recommend to apply note.
This will solve the problem.
Hope this will help you a bit to analyze the update error situation.
regards,
Vinodh. -
Hi All,
I am working on ecc6.0. I can see update records in my system. Due to reason of
"SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC" .
Error pened?in the ABAP Application Program
The current ABAP program "SAPLV60U" had to be terminated because it has
come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
please suggest me ho to overcome from this?
regards,
praveenPraveen,
There are several posts which give solution to this error. Use the search function on SDN forums.
Look at the following thread:
Reg: Update Failures
Cheers,
Nisch -
Activation of M records failure in DSO in process chain during weekend
Hi Experts,
We have got same issue again but this time after a month's time.
Once again it happened during weekend and this is error message which is same as it was in the past : -
Error occurred while deciding partition number
PSA update failed
Process 000003 returned with errors
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
Data pkgs 000001; Added records 1-; Changed records 0; Deleted records 0
Log for activation request ODSR_DBA2WH3T615GA6FOR093U3W7K data package 000001...000001
Errors occured when carrying out activation
Analyze errors and activate again, if necessary
Activation of M records from DataStore object ZDSO** terminated
I have done all the things suggested by the experts but still unable to understand this strange behaviour.
Please suggest your valuable thoughts regarding how to stop this from happening.
Regards
SunnyHi,
For the issue,
Background process BCTL_DBA2WH3T6167YSRG2JOPWJAHC terminated due to missing confirmation
You should make some adjustments to the Data Store object parameters, then you should be able to activate the request.
Please make the following adjustments in transaction RSODSO_SETTINGS (you can adjust this for each DataStore object):
1) Maximum package size (for activation).
This you should reduce to 10000. Then the package processing would
be less time consuming.
2) Maximum wait time for process (for activation)
This could be increased to e.g. 600
See attached Note 1118205 for further information.
Regards,
Mani -
I've got everything set up, ready to record and when I hit the record button in the transport it lights up then goes out but the play button keeps going, any ideas why this would happen?
Have you set the record path for the song? If you haven't, I think A is the default key command to open the window to do this. I'm not at a computer that has logic on it so I can't verify that.
-
Can't make Recovery DVD "recording failure when writing disc 1 (20)" C500 with Vista
I keep getting this error every time I try to make recovery dvd's. I did a restore to factory condition and still get this error. I even swapped out the DVD drive and still get the same error. Did a google search and this seems to be a common problem but didn't find any resolutions. This is a Presario C500 with Vista Basic and this is the first time I've tried to make Recovery Discs. Thanks
Did you use high quality DVD+R media?
-
Validate whether all the records are present in the list before writing
Hi,
I have the below code:-
List<CustomerVO> custlist = new ArrayList<CustomerVO>();
for (CustomerVO customerVO : custlist) {
try {
saveRecord(customerVO);
} catch (Exception e) {
custlist.add(customerVO);
if(){ // Here i need to compare whether all the records in the list are processed and there is no more records
// if so i wrire the all the error details at once by calling the writeErrorDetails
writeErrorDetails(frbVOlist);
Here in the if block I need compare whether all the records in the list are processed and there is no more records to process ,
if so write all the error details at once by calling the writeErrorDetails in the .TXT file.
The problem here is, how i will know whether the all the records are processed from the custList, so that I can write all of then atonce.
If the If conditional block is not there, then for each record failure a separate .txt file will be created. Hence if there are 4 failed records
then 4 .txt error file will be generated. Which should be avoided and i want to write all the 4 failed records in a single .txt file.
Hence, what may be the If condition i need to check from the list whether all the records are processed. Please , let me know your opinion.
Thanks.797836 wrote:
List<CustomerVO> custlist = new ArrayList<CustomerVO>();
for (CustomerVO customerVO : custlist) {
try {
saveRecord(customerVO);
} catch (Exception e) {Look at the following statement in the catch block.
custlist.add(customerVO);Is this correct? Why are you adding the faild record to the custlist again? I think, it should be like,
frbVOlist.add(customerVO);
if(){ // Here i need to compare whether all the records in the list are processed and there is no more records
// if so i wrire the all the error details at once by calling the writeErrorDetails
writeErrorDetails(frbVOlist);
}Call the writeErrorDetails(frbVOlist) after the end of the for loop by checking the size of the frbVOlist > 0. -
Time capsule backup failure after moving and changing internet access
I bought a 1GB time capsule to backup my MacBook Pro using time machine and also archived files so I would have these when I had to move across country to work temporarily. The time capsule was working fine in my home after the original backup through an ATT DSL, but I then moved across country and set up a Comcast cable DSL and now Time machine records under Backing up: Preparing and the latest backup records failure. Is there a way of fixing this without erasing the entire Time Capsule and then taking 2-3 days of backing up again and will I have access to these when I return to my original home with the capsule and MacBook Pro. I have tried resetting all the backup modes and options.
Linda,
According to the logs, you are going to need to initiate a backup, and then let it do it's thing uninterrupted, perhaps all day of over night. Time Machine needs to do a "deep traversal". See this article.
*_Time Machine May Report "Preparing..." For a Long Time_*
First, it’s good to determine WHY Time Machine is "Preparing..." for an extended period of time. Examining the Console logs during this event can reveal what is actually going on behind the scenes. It may be “Preparing…” for a genuinely good reason. How long is 'too long' to wait for Time Machine to finish "Preparing..."? Some times, "Preparing..." is required to perform the normal housekeeping that Time Machine does periodically. Other times, it really is "stuck" and never proceeds after many hours.
*”Deep Traversal” (Recent Crash / Forced Restart / System Update / Extended Period Between Backups)*
According to the following KB article it can sometimes take quite a long time if Time Machine begins a “deep traversal” and has to compare data inventories. This may apply to your situation, particularly if many Gigs of data are involved. [http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1516]
You see, Time Machine *+does not+* ordinarily perform file-by-file comparisons to determine what has changed and thus determine what needs to be backed up. Rather, Time Machine relies on FSEvents notifications. This is a log that the system uses to keep track of changes to directories. Rather than scan tens of thousands of files for changes each time, Time Machine simply looks at this log and narrows its’ scan to only the directories that have experienced changes since the last backup. Otherwise, Time Machine would have to be running constantly just to catch every change on its own and thus eat up precious CPU.
Every event that FSEvents records has its’ own ID which includes a time stamp. At the end of every backup, Time Machine stores the last event ID that it processes. When the next backup is initiated, Time Machine looks at this stored ID and determines that it only needs to backup events that have occurred after the time stamp on this last event ID.
If, due to a system crash, power failure, forced restart, or some other major system event, Time Machine cannot find this last event ID in the system logs then it will consider the FSEvents log “untrustable” and it will go into what’s called “deep traversal”. The Console logs may report +“Event store UUIDs don't match”.+ In this event, Time Machine will by-pass the system log entirely and perform its’ own file-by-file comparison to determine what has changed since its’ last backup. Obviously, if tens or hundreds of Gigs are involved, then this process can take quite some time and should be allowed to proceed.
Additionally, it appears that if Time Machine has to go back too far to find the last event ID, then it will give up and simply go into “deep traversal” and do the file-by-file scan on its’ own. This can occur if Time Machine has not been able to perform its’ hourly backups for some time, as is the case for users who only backup once a week or so. This is also the case with major Mac OS system updates that change thousands of files at one time. There are simply too many events logged by the system for Time Machine to bother looking for the last known event ID.
Cheers! -
Exchange 2003 SMTP resolves to incorrect MX record for Outbound emails
Starting October 2007, we have encountered numerous incidents where users complaint that they can not send emails to randomly with Relayed Denied error.
First we thought the problem is with the receipient servers, but after reviewing the SMTP log intensively, I have noticed that the SMTP service on Exchange Server 2003 SP2 tries to send out emails to wrong IP Addresses (instead of sending out to listed IP of MX record, it tries to send to primary domain IP address).
To test further, we have changed the DNS server of the Exchange Server to public DNS service provided by the ISPs and still received same result.
If the user tries to send the email again (from the bounced back message), it some times goes through.
Has anyone know what the problem is?
Have checked the server configuration, DNS configuration, ran all updates, and yet still same result. Is one of the Microsoft Updates causing this issue?Here is the official explanation i got from MS, sounds like it is doing what they expect it to do.
Problem Description
When Exchange 2003 sends e-mail to the Internet using DNS to resolve external domain names a DNS query is done for the remote domain's MX records. In the event that the initial MX query returns a "server failure", Exchange 2003 will fall back to a DNS A record query. If this query is, in turn, successful and there is an A record for the domain in question that happens to be listening on port 25, Exchange will make a connection to that server. However, if this server does not relay, or accept e-mail for the intended domain a NDR will be generated with a 5.7.1, or
5.5.0 error message.
There are several domains that have A records that point to IP addresses that accept connections on port 25, but do not relay for the same name space:
Eg: Mindspring.com; Earthlink.net
Resolution
Resolve the DNS resolution problems that are causing occasional MX record failures.
Examples:
1. The Exchange server has multiple default gateways set on a multi-homed server.
This is not a recommended configuration and can cause a number of unexpected network problems. If the internal DNS server the internal NIC points to cannot resolve external DNS queries, this problem can occur.
Action: remove the default gateway from one of the NICs.
This doesn’t applies to us, as we don’t use Internal DNS
2. If the Exchange server points to multiple DNS servers on TCP/IP properties, or on the SMTP Virtual Server properties, verify that each of these DNS servers will return MX records properly. If one of the DNS servers does not return DNS records consistently, rectify this problem.
Action: remove this DNS server from the external DNS tab.
Workaround:
Bypass DNS by creating a SMTP connector with address space of <domain.com> and forward to smart host as the IP address the MX/A points to.
Exchange Query Explained
1. If Exchange finds the MX record(s) for a remote domain (through DNS query) it will not fall back to an A record query in the event the MX record (more precisely, the A record the MX record points to) is temporarily not responding on port 25. Instead, Exchange will try another MX record if one exists. If no other MX records exist and none are responding on port 25, the queue will go into a retry state for this remote domain. When that retry state has expired, Exchange will again attempt to resolve MX records for this domain, and so on.
2. Exchange will fall back to an A record query for the remote domain in the event that no MX record can be found. This is not to say that the MX record does not exist - only that when Exchange issued a DNS query for the remote domain the DNS response was "server failure", which basically means no MX was found. So, the MX record may indeed exist, but Exchange simply could not find it through DNS resolution.
3. Exchange then queries the A record and this happens to return a result. If the A record is listening on port 25, but does not accept mail for <domain.com> then we will get the NDR with 550 5.7.1 unable to relay (or some variation of this NDR error code) when Exchange connects and attempts to send the e-mail.
So, the intermittent nature of the problem is caused by a failure to find the MX record and a success in finding A record. This can happen for a variety of reasons, but it boils down to flakey DNS resolution.
For example:
a. A bad DNS server listed as a forwader on the DNS server.
b. A bad DNS server on the TCP/IP properties.
c. A bad DNS server on the SMTP VS (external DNS servers)
d. Multiple default gateways on Exchange (ie. multiple NICs on different networks, each NIC having a default GW)
A netmon on Exchange will show the failed MX lookup and successful A record lookup; however, it may not be conclusive unless the "bad" DNS server is listed in the netmon trace. For example, if Exchange points to internal DNS server(s) for name resolution and these DNS servers service these DNS queries by Exchange, you may need a netmon on the DNS server(s) as well to determine which DNS server/Forwarder/etc is at fault.
Regards,
Shahul Hameed Dasthagir
Support Engineer | Enterprise Communications Support -
Live instruments are not recording...microphone works
i cant figure this out. please help.
i am getting so frustrated.
thanksMy impression is that the likiehood of recording failures increases significantly with those series record recordings scheduled well in advance where the timing/content of the program episode is revised in the EPG. Typically the sports channel programmes are most likely to fall into this category but other entertainment channels particularly those showing several different series of a tv show can in my experience cause issues.
-
Failed attempt to move log and database paths
Hi. Can anyone offer any advice on what might have caused an attempt to move Exchange 2010 (SP3) mailbox database and log folder paths to fail? I can't diagnose it, and would appreciate any advice.
We have two databases in a two-node DAG, one mounted on each node. I removed the passive copy of each database before the move attempts. The first moved ok. The second failed. Here's a summary of what happened:
Task 1:
DAG-NODE-A ----------------------------DAG-NODE-B
MAILBOX-DB-01 MAILBOX-DB-01
MOUNTED HEALTHY (passive)
- Dismount database
- Remove passive copy.
- Move logfolder path from R: to L:
and move EDB path from S: to M:
- Succeeded.
- Mount datbase.
- Re-add passive copy
All ok.
Task 2:
DAG-NODE-A ----------------------------DAG-NODE-B
MAILBOX-DB-02 MAILBOX-DB-02
HEALTHY (passive) MOUNTED
- Dismount database
- Remove passive copy.
- Move logfolder path from R: to L:
and move EDB path from S: to M:
- Failed. Paths not moved.
- Database now won't mount.
- Database eventually mounts
after approx. 30 auto retries.
- Abandon attempt to move paths.
- Re-add passive copy.
END
Here's some more detail, included event log and shell output:
So, as per the above, with Mailbox-DB-01 (active copy on DAG-NODE-A), Exchange moved the paths without a hitch and I was then able to mount the database and re-add the passive copy. I then tried to move the paths for Mailbox-DB-02 (active copy on DAG-NODE-B),
but after a few minutes Exchange aborted the move, outputting errors to the Shell, the application log and the MSExchange Management log. A second attempt failed because Exchange found that "The .edb file path is not available. There is already a file
named M:\Mailbox-DB-02\Mailbox-DB-02.edb" - Exchange had created an EDB file in the target location, but the source EDB file was still in the source location and the path was unchanged. Rather than re-trying the move again, I decided to try to mount the
database, to check it was ok, but it wouldn’t mount.
I left it alone for an hour or so to have a think about what to do, came back to it and found Exchange had mounted the database (without moving the paths) after around 30 automatic retries. I was then able to re-add the passive copy.
I’m not keen to re-try the move without knowing why it failed, why the database then wouldn’t mount, and why it subsequently recovered. Any advice would be appreciated. Many thanks.
Output included
- a WinRM error in the Shell’;
- an App Log error event from my attempt to mount the database after the move failure, saying an attempt to open the EDB file for read / write access failed with system error 32 because the file was being used by another process;
- events recording failure to configure and start the database, and noting a serious error which caused it to terminate its functional activity;
- Event ID 3154 from MSExchangeRepl, saying an Active Manager operation failed / database action failed / MapiExceptionCallFailed;
- Event ID 10056 from source MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store in the App Log just before Exchange successfully mounted the troublesome database, saying “Patch all ID counters for database Mailbox-DB-02.”
One other thing which may or may not be relevant – the MSExchange Service Host service stops soon after being started on DAG-NODE-B (reboots have made no difference). On DAG-NODE-A, it runs consistently.
Here’s what seems to me to be the most relevant output from the Application Log and the MSExchange Management Log on DAG-NODE-B, and from the Exchange Shell:
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:19 ESE 327 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine detached a database (4, S:\Mailbox-DB-02\Database\Mailbox-DB-02.edb). (Time=6 seconds)
Internal Timing Sequence: [1] 0.000, [2] 0.000, [3] 0.000, [4] 0.000, [5] 0.000, [6] 6.188, [7] 0.156, [8] 0.016, [9] 0.015, [10] 0.016, [11] 0.031.
Revived Cache: 0"
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:19 ESE 103 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine stopped the instance (4).
Dirty Shutdown: 0
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:19 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 9539 General The Microsoft Exchange Information Store database "Mailbox-DB-02" was stopped.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, MSExchange Management log
Information DD/MM/14 10:46:19 MSExchange CmdletLogs 1 General Cmdlet succeeded. Cmdlet Dismount-Database, parameters {Identity=Mailbox-DB-02}.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:19 MSExchangeRepl 3161 Service Active Manager dismounted database Mailbox-DB-02 on server DAG-NODE-B.company.corp.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, MSExchange Management log
Error DD/MM/14 10:46:20 MSExchange CmdletLogs 6 General Cmdlet failed. Cmdlet Get-PublicFolderDatabase, parameters {Status=True, Identity=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx}.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:21 MSExchange Assistants 9002 Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Stopped processing database Mailbox-DB-02 (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 10:46:21 MSExchange Assistants 9002 Assistants Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Stopped processing database Mailbox-DB-02 (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 10:51:08 MSExchange Search Indexer 104 General Exchange Search Indexer failed to enable the Mailbox Database Mailbox-DB-02 (GUID = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) after 10 tries. The last failure was: MapiExceptionMdbOffline: Unable to
get CI watermark (hr=0x80004005, ec=1142)
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, MSExchange Management log
Warning DD/MM/14 11:06:44 MSExchange CmdletLogs 4 General Cmdlet stopped. Cmdlet Move-DatabasePath, parameters {Identity=Mailbox-DB-02, EdbFilePath=M:\Mailbox-DB-02\Mailbox-DB-02.edb, LogFolderPath=L:\Mailbox-DB-02\Logs}.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Exchange Management Shell output
Processing data from remote server failed with the following error message: The WinRM client cannot complete the operation within the time specified. Check if the machine name is valid and is reachable over the network and firewall exception for Windows Remote
Management service is enabled. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
+ CategoryInfo : OperationStopped: (System.Manageme...pressionSyncJob:PSInvokeExpressionSyncJob) [], PSRemotingTransportException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : JobFailure
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 11:23:42 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 1000 General Attempting to start the Information Store "Mailbox-DB-02".
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 11:23:43 ESE 102 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine (14.03.0162.0000) is starting a new instance (4).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 11:23:43 ESE 105 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine started a new instance (4). (Time=0 seconds)
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:53 ESE 490 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: An attempt to open the file ""S:\Mailbox-DB-02\Database\Mailbox-DB-02.edb"" for read / write access failed with system error 32 (0x00000020): ""The
process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process. "". The open file operation will fail with error -1032 (0xfffffbf8).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:53 MSExchangeIS 9519 General "The following error occurred while starting database Mailbox-DB-02: 0xfffffbf8.
Failed to configure MDB. "
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:53 MSExchangeIS 9519 General "The following error occurred while starting database Mailbox-DB-02: 0xfffffbf8.
Start DB failed.. "
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:53 ExchangeStoreDB 215 Database recovery At 'DD/MM/2014 11:23:53' the Microsoft Exchange Information Store Database 'Mailbox-DB-02' copy on this server experienced a serious error which caused it to terminate its functional activity.
The error returned by the remount attempt was "There is only one copy of this mailbox database (Mailbox-DB-02). Automatic recovery is not available.". Consult the event log on the server for other storage and "ExchangeStoreDb" events for
more specific information about the failures.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:53 ExchangeStoreDB 231 Database recovery At 'DD/MM/2014 11:23:53', the copy of database 'Mailbox-DB-02' on this server encountered an error during the mount operation. For more information, consult the Event log on the server for "ExchangeStoreDb"
or "MSExchangeRepl" events. The mount operation will be tried again automatically.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 11:23:54 ESE 103 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine stopped the instance (4).
Dirty Shutdown: 0
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:54 ExchangeStoreDB 231 Database recovery At 'DD/MM/2014 11:23:54', the copy of database 'Mailbox-DB-02' on this server encountered an error during the mount operation. For more information, consult the Event log on the server for "ExchangeStoreDb"
or "MSExchangeRepl" events. The mount operation will be tried again automatically.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Error DD/MM/2014 11:23:54 MSExchangeRepl 3154 Service Active Manager failed to mount database Mailbox-DB-02 on server DAG-NODE-B.company.corp. Error: An Active Manager operation failed. Error The database action failed. Error: Operation failed with message:
MapiExceptionCallFailed: Unable to mount database. (hr=0x80004005, ec=-1032)
==================================================================================
NOTE:repeat events similar to some of the above continue until Exchange eventually manages to mount the database:
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:56 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 1000 General Attempting to start the Information Store "Mailbox-DB-02".
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:56 ESE 102 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine (14.03.0162.0000) is starting a new instance (4).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:56 ESE 105 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine started a new instance (4). (Time=0 seconds)
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:57 ESE 326 General "Information Store (3720) Mailbox-DB-02: The database engine attached a database (5, S:\Mailbox-DB-02\Database\Mailbox-DB-02.edb). (Time=0 seconds)
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:57 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 10056 General Patch all ID counters for database Mailbox-DB-02.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:57 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 1133 General Allocating message database resources for database "Mailbox-DB-02".
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:58 MSExchangeIS Mailbox Store 9523 General "The Microsoft Exchange Database ""Mailbox-DB-02"" has been started.
Database File: S:\Mailbox-DB-02\Database\Mailbox-DB-02.edb
Transaction Logfiles: R:\Mailbox-DB-02\Logs\
Base Name (logfile prefix): E03
System Path: R:\Mailbox-DB-02\Logs\
(Start Duration=00:00:01.844) "
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:15:58 MSExchangeRepl 3156 Service Active Manager successfully mounted database Mailbox-DB-02 on server DAG-NODE-B.company.corp.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:16:06 MSExchange Assistants 9001 Assistants Service MSExchangeMailSubmission. Started to process mailbox database Mailbox-DB-02 (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:16:09 MSExchange Assistants 9001 Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Started to process mailbox database Mailbox-DB-02 (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:16:12 MSExchange Assistants 9017 Assistants Service MSExchangeMailboxAssistants. Managed Folder Mailbox Assistant for database Mailbox-DB-02 (xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) is entering a work cycle. There are 125 mailboxes on
this database.
==================================================================================
DAG-NODE-B, Application Log:
Information DD/MM/2014 12:16:30 MSExchange Search Indexer 108 General Exchange Search Indexer has enabled indexing for the Mailbox Database Mailbox-DB-02 (GUID = xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).
==================================================================================
If you used the steps outlined in this TechNet article - http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd979782.aspx - then you should have been OK. I will say that I read one
article that said to work one database at a time, then when you are sure it is operational to go back and do the next, etc.
(I also assume by your shorthand at the beginning of this document that you performed the tasks on the active node when you did this work. If so, that's the best way to do it, so if it failed, it wasn't because you used the wrong steps or did them
on the wrong system.) -
How to handle BULK error IN Session
HI Lets take a scenario
I am uploading data of 1000 records in those I uploaded 400 records successfully
600 were failed, ( In case of less error records I will go to sm35 There I will process corresponding error session and I will do check I will upload this one I know)
what I have to do in bulk record failure case plz tell me
Point will rewarded
Thanks
Durga Prasad.Hi,
In the case of bulk error also same process of selecting your session in sm35 and press PROCESS.
Thanks and regards,
shyla -
How to show the errors in browser from servlet?
con=dataSource.getConnection();
System.out.println("before..............");
System.out.println("1.the mag value is:"+req.getParameter("mag"));
System.out.println("2.the bu value is:"+req.getParameter("bu"));
System.out.println("3.the description value is:"+req.getParameter("description"));
cStmt=con.prepareCall("{ call PKG_MAG.SP_Insert(?,?,?,?)}");
cStmt.setString(1, req.getParameter("mag"));
cStmt.setString(2, req.getParameter("bu"));
cStmt.setString(3, req.getParameter("description"));
cStmt.setString(4, "nagireddy");
result=cStmt.execute();
System.out.println("after...............");
if(result){
con.setAutoCommit(true);
System.out.println("the procedure executed successfully");
req.setAttribute("getResult","Record failure........");
else
con.rollback();
System.out.println("the procedure failed ");
req.setAttribute("getResult","Record added successfully");
rs.close();
cStmt.close();
con.close();
RequestDispatcher rDispatcher=req.getRequestDispatcher("MagView.jsp");
rDispatcher.forward(req,resp);
} catch (SQLException e) {
resp.setContentType("text/html");
PrintWriter out=resp.getWriter();
out.println("<html><head><title>ERROR Page</title></head><body>");
e.printStackTrace();
out.println("</body></html>");
out.close();
}e.printStackTrace() will send the stacktrace to the System.out, which will most likely end up in a logfile. One way to get the error to show up in the browser would be to rethrow the exception as a ServletException:
try{
} catch(Exception e) {
ServletException se = new ServletException(e.getMessage());
se.setStackTrace(e.getStackTrace());
throw se;
}Bit of a hack solution. You could also try this:
try{
} catch(Exception e) {
throw new ServletException(e);
}This will set your original exception as the cause of the ServletException. Tomcat (assuming you are using Tomcat) always prints a root cause, so I think it will display the exception correctly. -
I am transfering the data from Mysql database to Oracle 11gR2. I using a control table( here temp_tab ) to maintain the details of the source and target table and dblink info.
Also p1 is the procedure used for data transfer. My problem is
1) I am not able to move data for some of the MSQL tables as they have text columns. The text columns cannot be queried and inserted in oracle database. tables The whole insert
fails. The work around can be to use column names in select through which i am inserting data ( i can give null as <columnname> ) so that i can get text field as null for now.
But the problem is if i hard code the values in select dynamic character of code is destroyed.
2) I wanna use bulk collect in my code so that if one records fails the whole data of table doesnot fail. So that save exception can be used for record failure.
Can anyone suggest a work aroung in this code.
temp_tab
================================
source_tab target_tab dblink
aaa@dblink aaa1 dblink name
bbb@dblink bbb1 dblink name
ccc@dblink ccc1 dblink name
procedure p1 is
cursor cursor_tab is select * from temp_tab;
begin
for cur in cursor_tab
loop
begin
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'insert into ' || cur.target_tab || ' select * from ' || cur.source_tab;
exception
when other then
dbms_output.put_line(' the error is :: ' || sqlerrm(sqlcode));
end;
end loop;
end p1;What in your code is dynamic and requires native dynamic SQL?
Cursor FOR Loops have been obsolete in the Oracle database for more than 12 years ... why are you using one and why are you using a loop at all?
It appears that all you have, and require, is INSERT INTO ... SELECT * FROM.
You source table definition does not reference or use a database link. Why?
Maybe you are looking for
-
ok, so i set up an email account on my ipod so i don't have to go onto my pc to access emails from that account. but recently i needed to make a new email for use with other things and want to use the new email rather than the old one. how do i erase
-
Getting error while creating the user in user administration in portal
Hi folks, i am unable to create the user in user administration in portal due to the following error, could you please help regarding this issue "Current user has user creation permissions in the UME, but cannot create users in the back-end syst
-
HP Omni 220-1050xt Monitor goes blank at random times and will not light up.
Recently my computer screen starting going blank without any warning. One minute it is fine and I am working away, then the screen turns black and no key sequence will bring it back. I have selected a power scheme that has never, never, never set i
-
After following the instructions to reset my ipod classic i am confronted with a red cross. Does anyone know how to remove this?
-
I was updating firmware with OviSuite (ver.3). Then I got halfway the message: Something went wrong start all over again. But the phone does nothing. When I push startbutton the text testmode is on the screen for some time but that's all. What shold