Recording Interface Recommendations for 10.7.5?

I recently upgraded to 10.7.5 (IMax). My M-Audio recording interface does not have an upated driver (which was causing output sound issues), so I'm on the hunt for a new interface. Any recommendations for a small, desktop unit for $200 or less? I don't need a big complex rack unit, but would like quality recordings of guitar and voice. I use garage band and logic pro 9.
Thanks much!

Deleting Safari and reinstalling it will probably not solve your problem. If you have not deleted Safari yet, please do not do that!
First, just try holding down the shift key while opening Safari. This will prevent it from trying to open any pages that were open when it last quit. Your problem could be nothing more than Safari re-opening a page that was open from a previous browsing session.
If that doesn't work, see:
Eliminating browser redirects and advertisements
Go through all the tests there, and if they indicate that you may have adware installed, proceed to the adware guide it refers you to.
If you have already deleted Safari, just hold down command-R at startup to enter recovery mode, then reinstall the system. Installing right on top of your existing system will replace any items that may have been deleted or damaged, and will leave all your other apps and documents alone.

Similar Messages

Firewire Recording Interface recommendations

I'm looking for a Firewire interface to input about 8 to 12 channels from a band into Logic Pro. This Presonus Firestudio Project (8 channels for about $450 after rebate) looks reasonable but nowhere does it explicitly mention being compatible with Logic Pro.
Will it work?
Any other recommendations or better deals?

Maybe another good alternative in that price category could be the Focusrite Liquid Saffire 56 (http://www.focusrite.com/products/saffire/liquidsaffire56/). To be honest, I don't have experience with that particular device, but I own the Saffire PRO 10 (a 10 input firewire audio interface that has been removed from their current product list). It works fine in Logic 9.
Message was edited by: Jan Voortwist

Yamaha MO8 and Korg Volcas with Logic Pro X- recommendations for mixer and audio interface

I plan to use Logic Pro X to access and configure the patch list for my Yamaha MO8 workstation. The Steinberg software I downloaded previously didn't work and never allowed me to configure the sounds. From what I've heard, I was told to use a cheap mixer or a Audio/MIDI interface (like the Scarlett 2i2 or 4i4). The Yamaha MO8 will be used as a master and has MIDI IN, OUT, and THRU. I also have the Korg Volca synths to use as slaves (they only have the MIDI IN port), and plan to connect them to the MIDI THRU on the keyboard. I already have the Yamaha USB driver installed, and the Mac recognizes the device. I also have the Portmidi app and wonder if that will allow me to see the patch list (with the actual names, not numbers).
What mixer and audio/MIDI interface do you recommend to use the Yamaha MO8 and the Korg Volcas? Just to be clear, I don't want to use software synths, but would like to use the external instruments to get the audio (which I know can be selected through the Environment Panel on Logic Pro X).

Anything with 2 audio inputs and 2 MIDI outs.
-Out HP jack of Volca-1/8 to 1/4 adapter into Audio interface 1 (For any that are stereo use both 1 and 2 and use a Y splitter in addition to 1/8 to 1/4 adapters.
-Midi out from interface to Midi in of volca (Or buy a USB to MIDI interface for about $35)
-When starting up the volcas hold down the "Memory button" the LED will tell you what MIDI channel it is set to, you can change it if you wish)
-Create external MIDI track and set it to the same channel as the Volca (Only if you want to do sequencing in the DAW, if thee Volca sequencer is handling it then not necessary)
-Patch together the Volcas via the "synch out/Synch in" jacks to insure they are synched
-Record them all together or one at a time, depending on how many simultaneous tracks your interface can handle.

I need an app that allows - top notch Powerpoint accessibility. Notetaking and audio recording. AND a possible translator. Is there any appl or two that are recommended for a busy traveling executive?

My boss just purchased and IPad and needs an app that allows -
Powerpoint Editing and graphics capability/accessibility.
Notetaking and audio recording.
Japanese Translator.
Is there any appl or two that are recommended for this busy traveling executive?
Mahalo Nui Loa!

dmkimball wrote:
Japanese Translator.
Have a look at
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/google-translate/id414706506?mt=8

Recommendations for audio interface with new mac pro to avoid latency?

Hi friends,
I have a new Mac Pro on order for editing video in FCPX, but Presonus says my older Presonus Firebox won't work with Mavericks and the new Mac Pro. Do you have a recommendation for a replacement?
I only use the interface to drive 2 powered expternal speakers and a headset, so I don't need something super sophisticated.
As I read about units, almost all come with USB 2.0 connections. But the new Mac Pro only offers USB, Thunderbolt 2, Dual Gigabit Ethernet, and HDMI 1.4 Ultra HD inputs. If I can't find a fairly inexpensive audio interface with USB 3.0, I'd have to go through another connection to get into the Mac Pro.
The key for me is to make sure and avoid latency, a critical issue for editing video.
Any advice is much appreciated. Thanks. Duncan

Thanks Mark and Smokerz,
Your point about USB2 working in USB3 ports is something I wasn't aware of. That opens a lot of doors for me. And I'll look into the Yamaha sound board as one possibility.
Thank you both for helping me.
Duncan

Recommendations for speaker systems for DVD player/recorder

I'm getting a DVD recorder soon and I hope to get some recommendations on suitable Creative speaker systems.
The room is fairly big but the TV area is rather confined..so i prefer a set whose speakers are not too big or bulky or numerous (i think i'll stop at 5.1 since i have limited space to put the speakers). Budget is flexible, but of course the cheaper the better (hopefully under $350).
The TV sounds good when watching TV programs but it reproduces an unbalanced ratio of muddy dialogue and loud sound effects when playing back DVDs. I end up having to crank up the volume so high to hear what the characters are saying, and of course, the background audio gets boosted way loud as well. So my main consideration is reproducing clear speech and dialogue and crisp (not overly loud) background audio - any recommendations for this?
Which models have an optical/coaxial input? Can i just hook up the speakers to the optical/coaxial or RCA outputs of the DVD recorder/player since most models have in-built DTS decoders? Which are the least problematic models?
Thank you.

I think I have the same question more or less. I bought a cheap Best Buy memorex speaker docking station and I need a male to female IPOD cable so that I can Play the radio and charge the IPOD at the same time as well of course have the head phone jack plugged into the Line In that acts as the antenna.
So if I had the Male to Female cable My dock would charge and the cable to the line in acts as a Antenna. I think this makes sense..

Hardware recommendations for a newbie

After many long and frustrating years at the hands of PC and MS I will soon be purchasing an iMac (it seems to be a world of bliss in comparison to my current setup!)
Soon after the iMac (2.4GHz, 1GB RAM, Mac OS X v10.4.10) I will be purchasing an audio interface and midi controller for use with GB8 and perhaps later with ProTools. I generally do home recording with guitars, mic and some midi, no more than 2-4 tracks at a time. I would like the option of portable (ie USB or Firewire for a laptop when required). Looking at keeping the spending on both items to aproximately Aust$500 (US$400) each.
Do any of you kind folks have some ideas as to stable and compatible hardware which would suit my needs and also offer the versatility of using within other applications (ProTools) at a later date?
At this stage the PreSonus Firebox has been recommended to me as a suitable Interface for my needs, the M-Audio 410 has been stated as having driver probs.
In regards to midi controllers have looked at M-Audio Axiom49, however some have stated that is not a simple plugnplay as some other options.
Would sincerely appreciate your ideas and suggestions to get me on the way.
Many Thanks

As far as Quality and just all around "Goodness", you can't go wrong with PreSonus, they make GREAT hardware (I use a FirePod). I'm not sure about being bus powered though, someone else will have to comment on that (or you'll need to do a bit more research)
Here's a jumping off point:
http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/Interfaces.html
For a Controller, check of out the first one listed here (It's the one I have), pure plug and play:
http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/MIDIControllers.html

Need a printer recommendation for a small office

hey folks, hoping someone might be able to suggest a recommendation for our business. We’ve had an OkiData color laser printer that’s lasted over 6 years but it’s been giving us some trouble over the last year and yesterday it stopped printing with an error we can’t resolve. Would have to bring a tech in to fix and we’d basically already decided that once this thing bit the dust we’d move on to something else. It’s time.
We are looking for something in the $200-$400 range, would consider going a little higher if it was clearly worth it. We want something that connects wireless, prints quickly and reliably in Snow Leopard over an Airport Extreme network, decent color print quality is important but doesn’t have to be photo quality (we have an HP Photosmart for that kind of stuff), and it needs to have reasonable printing cost per page. We don’t print a tremendous amount of stuff, but we probably go through 100-200 pages a day and it adds up.
Was looking at the HP OfficeJet Pro 8500 wireless and that looks like a nice unit except half the people who buy one hate it. Looks like HP quality control is lacking and if you get a good unit, great, but the odds are good you’ll get a lousy one.
Also looking at the Brother HL-3070CW, but reviews say it has a high consumable cost.
Basically, the more I look into this the more I head spins and now I've got myself wrapped around the axle and don’t know what to do.
Any suggestions would be GREATLY appreciated.

I would steer clear of the 500 express. Since you seem to be new to cisco products, I would use the opportunity and buy what most of your potential customers already have. Get yourself a pix/asa and a 2900 series switch as first poster suggested. If you are interested in certifications, you will need to learn the command line interface. The 500 express will do you no good as it is all gui. This is only my opinion of course. Oh, and did I see not expensive and cisco in the same sentence. :)

Journal Import finds no records in GL_INTERFACE for processing.

Hi,
I'm using the Oracle Web ADI (11i) to upload journal entries form a spreedsheat to GL.
When the request is finished, this message is shown on the out put :
Journal Import finds no records in GL_INTERFACE for processing.
Check SET_OF_BOOKS_ID, USER_JE_SOURCE_NAME, and GROUP_ID of import records.
If no GROUP_ID is specified, then only data with no GROUP_ID will be retrieved. Note that most data
from the Oracle subledgers has a GROUP_ID, and will not be retrieved if no GROUP_ID is specified.
Can you help me to reslove it.
Thx.

Hi Msk;
You have below errors,
LEZL0008: Found no interface records to process.
LEZL0009: Check LEDGER_ID, GROUP_ID, and USER_JE_SOURCE_NAME of interface records.Journal Import Finds No Records in gl_interface for Processing [ID 141824.1]
Journal Import Finds No Records in GL_INTERFACE For Processing For AX and AP Sources [ID 360994.1]
GLMRCU does not populate GL_INTERFACE to produce journal for reporting sob [ID 1081808.6]
Regards
Helios

IPad recording interface with built in speaker

Are there any simple recording interfaces for iPad like iRig that have a built in speaker? I hate using headphones and I want something simple, not a professional setup (like an track dock where I have to connect powered speakers,etc)-I can do that on my iMac. Something that is portable that is simple to plug a guitar into.

Hi Bellet & Welcome to Apple Discussions,
The easiest way I know how to record simple audio (of the types you describe) through your PowerBook's internal microphone is to download and install a free app called Audio Recorder.
-- JDee

Records Management: Model for customer - project - records hierarchy

Hello,
starting with RM I just created a static structure for customer data. This works pretty well at the beginning level.
Now I would like to add a hierarchy to the customer data. The next level in the structure should be projects with the project that are associated with the customer. The projects are managed with PS. So every time a PSP element is created on a special level will automatically create some model nodes with elements (offer, order, .. ). Under the level of the projects there should be records like offer, order, ..
Could someone could give me some hints how to solve this, please? What is the best practice for something like that?
Is this the right forum for this question?
Thanks a lot,
Vanessa

Dear Vanessa,
Unfortunately, we have not been able to get an exclusive forum for RM hence, a post anywhere with Records Management or Case Management will be good(I generally search for questions on these keywords).
For your question - adding a new sub-structure to the same record or case everytime there is a project etc is created is technically not feasible. Even if you make this feasible by programming it will be very difficult to maintain. I would recommend to have an object(record or case) for every sub-structure that needs to be created with a separate record model for the sub-structure.
For eg - if you need to create & add a new sub-project to a main project every time for an event, then instantiate an object(record/case) & then add it to the project record.
Some points to consider - recommendation is to not to have more than 1000 objects linked to any one folder as after that time consumed to expand the folder becomes visibly high for the user.
Hope this helps...
Best Regards,
Pragya

Recommendations for Analog to Digital conversion

I am seeking the help of all the Pros out there. I am moving my extensive analog music collection (LP/Cassette) to the digital world. Are there any recommendations for creating a CD-quality sound/volume level. I am currently using the standards (click/pop/hiss reduction, compressor and/or hard limiting). I am recording at 44.1/16 Bit and saving files in mp3 PRO-320 kbps for sake of storage. I welcome any assistance in regard to Plug-ins, equalization or other suggestions.
Thank you in advance
Paddy 41
Pentium 4/3.2 GHz, 2.0 MB Ram, Soundblaster X-Fi Elite Pro, Windows XP PRO SP3, Adobe Audition 3.0, Sony PS-LX250H Turntable, Denon DRM-600 Cassette.

>I am recording at 44.1/16 Bit and saving files in mp3 PRO-320 kbps for sake of storage. I welcome any assistance in regard to Plug-ins, equalization or other suggestions.
You shouldn't save files as MP3s until all the processing you want to do has been done - this is a lossy format, and every time you open a file saved like this it gets re-decoded, and then re-encoded when you do a save. And the quality degeneration is progressive. And unfortunately, recording your files as 16-bit is also not going to be quite the thing to do if you are going to do any sort of amplitude processing at all, either, especially if you are recording at a lower-than-optimum amplitude, which is usually the case. 44.1k is fine, though!
So, to get over the potential problems, the thing to do is to digitise your files as 44.1k 32-bit floating point, and until all processing is done, store them as Windows PCM wav files in this format, because that is uncompressed, which is what you need.
If you want to reduce noise on cassette recordings, it's worth using a fairly high FFT setting, even though it takes longer to do the processing. Since most of the noise is not LF, this tends to work better, although there is also a case for doing the NR twice, once with a lower FFT setting and once with a higher one, but not trying to take out too much in one go.
As for click reduction - well, you have to experiment. But letting the software determine all of the levels tends to give you a pretty good starting point. Another trick that's sometimes worth it is to transform your files temporarily to M-S stereo instead of L-R, and treat each channel separately - you generally get different levels of clicks in each, usually more in the S signal, whilst the M cancels out quite a few. And in general, the less clicks you can get away with processing, the better.
Hard limiting? Never used it on a conversion like that at all, and wouldn't even consider it - transients are already likely to be distorted, and hard limiting them further seems like a
very strange thing to do...
Other tools that are useful, especially on cassettes are iZotope's Ozone (some of which is already in Audition) and HarBal. You can restore usually distorted frequency responses with the latter, and get a good average value automatically and easily. And judicious use of Ozone's enhancer can make them seem a lot less like the results came from a cassette...
One of the useful things you can do with Ozone is to selectively widen parts of the spectrum. Since most records of music tend (for reasons of tracking) to have had the bass forced to be virtually mono, with subsequent similar consequences for other instruments with substantial LF content, it's worth expanding just about everything under about 250Hz, possibly by more than you might think.
Generally, 'normal' EQ doesn't have a lot of use when processing vinyl, if it's relatively recent. And that generally means anything from the 60's onwards. If you think things are seriously wrong, the chances are that it's your monitors and environment that are misleading you. Just bear in mind that when this stuff was produced, it was all monitored in a professional environment - more so than it might be today, even.
No doubt there will be a few other responses - I don't think that the foregoing is anything like complete, but is at least a start.

Enhanced Interface Determination for IDOCs

Hi All,
I've a query on the usage of Enhanced Interface Determination for IDocs.
I've to create IDocs based on the condition in the Message Mapping i.e. say if recordtype in the source is A then IDoc1 should be created and if recordtype is B then IDoc2 should be created.
Is it possible to use Enhanced Interface Determination to achieve this??.. Because I was told by someone that Enhanced Interface Determination can't be used for IDoc based scenarios though am using External Definitions for the mapping purpose. Please clarify.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Joe.

Hi Sridhar/ Bhavesh,
Thanks for your prompt reply. I think I wasn't clear in my previous post.
The scenario is the input file has three different record types (3 different structures) and the IDocs should be created based on the record type. I don't think I can use the condition based scenario as the record types are totally different. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Joe.

I need a recommendation for SAN (Actually NAS) ethernet switches.

Hi, we have one Dell blade chassis with 8 servers ---- connected to stacked switches (3750) with EtherChannels ---- to NetApp (Controller 1 and 2 accordingly). Unfortunately, Dell blade servers only supports 1Gbps for port and NetApp also supports 1Gbps for each port (ports are all ethernet, not FC)
Questions
1) What kind of switch do you recommend? I know that it is not popular to use ethernet in SAN I just recognized that we have NAS, what do you recommend switches for NAS?
not SAN, so any MDS 9000 series don't work because it supports limited ethernet ports (many FC ports). I need many ethernet ports at least 48 ports from each switch. I know Nexus is one of candidates, but want to double check.
2) Most of vendors ask what kind of connection I have. I said usually just ethernet, not FC, not FCoE. Is it right? I believe that since I found NAS, it is "Ethernet"
3) The reason that I am looking for different switches is there are huge packet dropped (outbound) in switches (outgoing toward both dell servers and netapp; incoming is ok) We recently moved PtoV so, it is possible that traffic volume was increased. But output doesn't give me lot of information like below. Do you have any recommendation for further t-shoot?
(connected interface to Dell)
GigabitEthernet2/0/34 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 580a.20f1.db22 (bia 580a.20f1.db22)
Description: Chassis8
MTU 9000 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 00:00:57, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 32453861
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 3853000 bits/sec, 364 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 2275000 bits/sec, 368 packets/sec
15864561667 packets input, 16858567695886 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 4347 broadcasts (6 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 6 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
47326292220 packets output, 62942914503089 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures
(connected to NetApp)
Port-channel2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 2c3e.cfaa.af03 (bia 2c3e.cfaa.af03)
MTU 9000 bytes, BW 3000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is unknown
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
Members in this channel: Gi1/0/3 Gi2/0/1 Gi2/0/2
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 3316452
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 6693000 bits/sec, 2048 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 30028000 bits/sec, 2773 packets/sec
107334585357 packets input, 140120529103340 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 5609191 broadcasts (407218 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 407218 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
38961062194 packets output, 40437523739199 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Thanks.

Hi, we have one Dell blade chassis with 8 servers ---- connected to stacked switches (3750) with EtherChannels ---- to NetApp (Controller 1 and 2 accordingly). Unfortunately, Dell blade servers only supports 1Gbps for port and NetApp also supports 1Gbps for each port (ports are all ethernet, not FC)
Questions
1) What kind of switch do you recommend? I know that it is not popular to use ethernet in SAN I just recognized that we have NAS, what do you recommend switches for NAS?
not SAN, so any MDS 9000 series don't work because it supports limited ethernet ports (many FC ports). I need many ethernet ports at least 48 ports from each switch. I know Nexus is one of candidates, but want to double check.
2) Most of vendors ask what kind of connection I have. I said usually just ethernet, not FC, not FCoE. Is it right? I believe that since I found NAS, it is "Ethernet"
3) The reason that I am looking for different switches is there are huge packet dropped (outbound) in switches (outgoing toward both dell servers and netapp; incoming is ok) We recently moved PtoV so, it is possible that traffic volume was increased. But output doesn't give me lot of information like below. Do you have any recommendation for further t-shoot?
(connected interface to Dell)
GigabitEthernet2/0/34 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is Gigabit Ethernet, address is 580a.20f1.db22 (bia 580a.20f1.db22)
Description: Chassis8
MTU 9000 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, media type is 10/100/1000BaseTX
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 00:00:57, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 32453861
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 3853000 bits/sec, 364 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 2275000 bits/sec, 368 packets/sec
15864561667 packets input, 16858567695886 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 4347 broadcasts (6 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 6 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
47326292220 packets output, 62942914503089 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 1 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures
(connected to NetApp)
Port-channel2 is up, line protocol is up (connected)
Hardware is EtherChannel, address is 2c3e.cfaa.af03 (bia 2c3e.cfaa.af03)
MTU 9000 bytes, BW 3000000 Kbit/sec, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 2/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive set (10 sec)
Full-duplex, 1000Mb/s, link type is auto, media type is unknown
input flow-control is off, output flow-control is unsupported
Members in this channel: Gi1/0/3 Gi2/0/1 Gi2/0/2
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output 00:00:01, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 3316452
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 6693000 bits/sec, 2048 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 30028000 bits/sec, 2773 packets/sec
107334585357 packets input, 140120529103340 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 5609191 broadcasts (407218 multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
0 watchdog, 407218 multicast, 0 pause input
0 input packets with dribble condition detected
38961062194 packets output, 40437523739199 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 collisions, 2 interface resets
0 unknown protocol drops
0 babbles, 0 late collision, 0 deferred
0 lost carrier, 0 no carrier, 0 pause output
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
Thanks.

Error when writing to interface table for HR

We recently did a client copy from Production to our User Testing client. User was trying to enter time via transaction CAT2 but received the following message when attempting to save the timesheet:
"Error when writing to interface table for HR"
Does anyone have advice on how to resolve this issue?
Thanks as always!

Hi,
We have the same problem.
We tried to add many records to HR via a job but it result with en error message LR036 (Error when writing to interface table for HR)
Did you find a solution since your problem appear ?

Recording Interface Recommendations for 10.7.5?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for