Recover cost element associated with internal orders. Tx KPF6

Hi,
I need to recover only the cost element associated with the internal orders listed in tx. KPF6. Can anyone please tell me how can I do this?, do I need to copy the entire tx to a Ztx?? or can i do this through an User Exit???
Thanks, Fiorella

Hi Fiorella,
Try using table AUFK.
It gives you the Responsible cost center as  well as the Cost center for basic Settlement for a particular internal Order.
In case you need any other information, feel free to revert.
Thanks,
Sonal
P.S. Would it be helpful if i tell you how to get Internal Orders from an Internal order Group??

Similar Messages

  • Compare the cost element of each internal order

    Hello All,
    How can we compare the cost element of each internal order?
    let me know how can we maintain the budget for each cost element for each internal order.  so that along the year, we can compare budget and actual for controlling purpose.
    Thanks
    Naveen

    Hi,
    I guess you mean comparing plan value by cost element for different IOs.
    If you want to compare those (same as actual), you could put internal orders, ranges or groups into the respecitve columns. I also did this once I think for car costs, where the manager wanted to see 10 cars next to each other and compare them (in this case it was actual figures, but same is possible with plan values).
    You just need to unselect IO on general data selection and use this as characteristic in the columns then.
    hope this helps?
    regards
    Bjoern

  • Integrate Employe with internal order other than cost center

    Dear Experts,
    Integrate Employe with internal order other than cost center
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mythili
    Edited by: Mythili.R on Jan 10, 2012 1:45 PM
    Edited by: Sikindar on Jan 10, 2012 6:23 PM

    Can use IT0027 at employee level or IT1018 at OM level

  • Finance and Controlling report in combination with Cost center, GL account, Internal Order

    Hi Members,
    Finance and Controlling report in combination with Cost center, GL account, Internal Order.
    Please provide any slandered report in all 3 dimension.
    Thanks
    Dileep Kumar

    Search this query in FI Controlling forum am sure you will get useful results there.
    This kind of reports related to Controlling are usually created using Report Writer tool.
    In fact majority of reports in Controlling component is created using Report Writer only.

  • Sales order cost objective vs OKB9  Internal order cost object.

    Hi All,
    we facing an  issue with sales order cost objective vs OKB9 cost object.
    For IC PO service material, we assigned account assignment category 4.Reasonis Service material was not showing on G\R account.
    The G\L account 7898788, we assigned to Service Item (material type DIEN)  , for G\Cost 7898788 cost element is assigned in OKB9. Combination business + order 3478787.
    Now conflict with sales order cost objective vs OKB9  internal order cost object.
    While posting intercompany IR posting system thronging below error messageu2026
    Enter only one true account assignment
    Message no. KI249
    Diagnosis
    You made assignments to several objects in CO (cost center, order, project etc.). 2 of these have been created as true objects.
    System Response
    You are allowed only one account assignment for each cost-relevant account
    How to resolve this issue.. Do I make any config changes in the system to overcome this issue?
    Or any sub account to assin in VKOA config for internal orderu2026
    Regards,
    Adi

    Hi Waman,
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Issue :  IR failed to post for wax  Sales Order -> ICPO  - Error:  Enter only one true account assignmentu2019.
    Background:
    Original setup  in  Test system   & Productionu2013 account determination for servive (DIEN) account assignment category u20184u2019 was linked to G/L Account  34444444, As part of project orange u2019, account determination was linked to account u201889710100u2019.
    Account u20188970100u2019   34444444 was replaced with 8970100 ,is not linked to any cost center & always post with reference to IC Sales Order as per config in OKB9 based on company code (US99) + cost element (89701100) + business area (9yyy). This caused a conflict while posting IR, system could not determine exact order for posting financial value.
    Conflict:  Actual Sales Order 34789343 is  linked to PO via account assignment category & IC dummy sales order (8014331) is determine via config setting. Two cost objects cannot be linked to one IR G/L account booking.
    Regards,
    Adi

  • Posting a CO document with internal order

    Hi,
    Can anybody let me know the procedure of posting a CO document with internal order?
    Regards,
    Prasad

    Hello Naga,
    The CO document will be created automaticallywhen you posta document in FICO with a cost object assignment. By cost object assignment I mean u put the internal order number in oreder field of GL line item. The GL will be a primary cost element in kost cases of expense type.
    Hope I had been able to help you. please assign points.My points had been pending with you for last query resolution also.
    Rgds
    Manish

  • Problems and Issues with Internal Order Transactions

    Hello I have a couple of problems with Internal Order Transactons.
    Its strange really, when I simulate in the development server. I do the following process:
    Assign Asset with IO -> Create PR with account assignment to an Asset -> Create PO with Reference to PR -> Create GR.
    Once this occurs, the transaction seems to reflect in particular reports such as List: Order by Cost Element, List: Budget/Actual/Commitments, etc.
    But when another user does a similar process in PRD, it doesnt seem to reflect in these reports.
    Also while, I cant seem to pass the GR if the Internal Order has not been released. The user was able to create a GR whose IO has not been released yet.
    These problems are quite striking to me. Does anyone know the possible causes of the situations at hand? Any feedback will be most helpful.
    Thank you all and good day.

    Ok never mind, seems I found the culprit (though the reason gives more questions than answers)! Thanks anyways

  • Freegoods issue with internal order CO

    Dear Experts,
    I am facing a Problem with free goods issue,
    When I am doing sales order VA01 I am entering internal order number, once I complete the process flow it is crediting stock account (24240000) and debiting the COGS FG (50014000) account.
    When I am doing sales order VA01 without internal order once I complete the process flow it is crediting Stock account (24240000)  and Debiting the Free goods expenses account(60014010) (as per business process it is correct)
    With internal order also it should post to free goods expenses account.
    Kindly help me on this I am not able to trace.

    Hi
    Please check item category TANN settings.Also check in VTLA copy control  there is a feild "Update Cost", tick the feild.
    Please go through the links which may help you
    PGI accounting
    Regards
    Srinath

  • Cost center v/s Internal Order

    Hi
    What is the difference between a cost center & Internal Order
    Regards
    Samir

    Hi Samir,
    Cost Center is an Organizational unit within a controlling area that represents a clearly delimited location where costs occur. You can make organizational divisions on the basis of functional, settlement-related, activity-related, spatial, and/or responsibility-related standpoints.
    Cost Center is a CO Object maintained on long-term basis to capture costs related to particular type of cost based on functionality, nature of cost etc.
    An internal order is used to monitor parts of the costs, and under certain circumstances, the revenues of the organization.
    Internal Order is a CO Object maintained to capture the costs of specific purpose (like campaigns, events etc) which is of short-term purpose.
    Let us understand the difference with the following example...
    If you have a Cost Center "HR Department", whenever some expenditure is incurred for HR Dept, that cost will be booked to HR Dept Cost Center.
    Let us assume that your company is about to take up a Recruitment Campaign (like campus placements) for about 3 months all over the country.
    So, you can create an Internal Order "Recruitment Campaign". The Internal Order can be "Real" and "Statistical".
    If you create the Internal Order as a "Real" object, then, at the time of booking the expenses relating to Recruitment Campaign, all costs will flow to the Internal Order and then, costs will be settled to your "HR Department" Cost Center at the period-end.
    If you create the Internal Order as a "Statiscal" object, then, at the time of booking the expenses, you can select your "HR Department" Cost Center as well as your "Recruitment Campaign" Internal Order as CO objects. In this case, real postings will happen to Cost Center and statistical postings will happen to Internal Order. There will not be any requirement to settle the Internal Order to Cost Center. Here, this statiscal internal order will be information purposes only...
    Hope this is clear, pls revert back for further explanation...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Profit center substitution with internal order when generating GL doc from

    Profit center substitution with internal order when generating GL doc from MM
    Dear expert,
    Please advise how to substitute successfully the profit center by which user-exit via FI substitution function.
    Substitutions have been set for profit centers in FI via t-code OBBH, but  the profit center will always be determined from the internal order when posting from MM subcon goods receipt
    Thanks
    James
    Edited by: Yun-Chung Yung on Jun 3, 2010 10:46 PM

    Hi,
    SAP give note 539421 - Dummy profit center with cost center
    account assignment. Looks applicable for your case.
    Solution:
    With the attached modification, you can restore the function from Release
    3.1: The directly assigned profit center remains and is not overwritten
    with the dummy profit center of the cost center.
    The problem is not caused by a program error in this case. The profit
    center is always derived from the existing CO account assignment even if
    this is the dummy profit center (see also Note 62417).
    This note applicable from release 40 until 605
    I hope this can help you. FYI, in my case, i do not create dummy profit centre, then profit centre working as sap priority.
    Regards,
    Dewi

  • Posting of Perks with internal order

    Hello
    We have maintained cost distribution infotype with subtype 01 for all employees. The regular salary as well as perks are posted using this distribution. Now we have a requirement to post mobile expenses with internal order. In FI Side profit centre is maintained in internal order master, one to one relationship. In IT 27 multiple cost centres are maintained, each cost centre is having separate profit centres, So when we are trying to maintain the internal order in It 27, system is restricting us.
    If we maintain another record in It 27 with custom subtype with internal order and one cost centre which is being maintained in internal order master.How to link one particular wagetype with custom subtype of IT27, so that it will get posted with internal order.
    Thanks
    Swapna

    Thank you.
    Customizing in ACSET  was missing.
    It is working fine now

  • Cost Break Up of Internal Orders-Overhead

    Hi mates,
    I have created an internal order with an object class: u2018Over Headsu2019, for which costs were pooled and finally internal orderu2019s balances, are to be settled against the FG material.
    I want to see the cost components breakup for the costs incurred in the internal order.
    Can anybody help as how and where to link the cost component structure to the internal order, so that I could see the cost break up and also request to give the areas of integration between Project System and Controlling
    Thanks in advance
    KS

    Hi,
    Report S_ALR_87012996 will be of help to you. For settlements, you look in the config for Allocation structure & settlement profile that your order/order type is assigned to.
    Thanks
    Jagdish

  • Exit / badi for individual service line item detail with internal orders.

    Hello guys,
    <b>Issue 1.</b>as per our scenario we want to get the individual service line item details with Internal Orders.
    Please provide me any exit/badi with each item level with individual service line item Internal Orders.
    <b>Issue 2:</b> Remain same for issue 3 for blocking status. We want to delete item level for particular line what about the service rows which assigned in particular item.
    point will be rewarded for the suitabel answers.
    please give me response  ASAP.
    With Regards
    yogesh

    Hey Yogesh,
    I have the same scenario... Could you please drop a mail to [email protected] with the details of BADI and other details that you implemted for the same.
    Thanks a lot in advance.

  • Employee cost should hit to Internal order

    Dear Friends,
    We started new plant and  hired employers ,cost center profit center not ready yet( we created one Internal order as over head order ).
    Employee Cost through Payroll  so HR People has already created a new Organizational Unit and we have tagged it to an Internal Order.  We have hired some test employees and have run payroll for this newly hired employees.
    So the system is throwing the following errors.
    Error 1)*Account assignment objects are incorrect. No substitution is possible.*
    *Message no. 3G209*
    *Diagnosis*
    *The account assignment object check showed that, from the point of view of CO, the specified account assignment is not valid, and cannot be replaced by the employee's master cost center or a substitute cost center. This item cannot be posted.*
    Error 2)Internal error: No valid return value for segment found
    Message no. 3G330
    Diagnosis
    No valid value was returned as a result of the segment check. The Customizing settings for the general ledger, however, request a value for the account assignment of the segment.
    Error 3)No segment found
    Message no. FAGL_ORG_UNITS007
    Diagnosis
    No segment could be derived for the current line.
    However, in the Customizing settings for General Ledger Accounting, you have selected the segment as a mandatory balancing field. This means that a segment must be assigned in each line item.
    System Response
    The posting is rejected.
    Procedure
    Edit your segment derivation or make changes to the Customizing settings for document splitting.
    Kindly suggest me onthis its very urgent.
    Regards,
    Sudha.

    Dear Raviteja,
    Thanks for your Reply ,
    Allready i checked the link which you have provided but our case is different.
    Actually the Employee Cost should hit to Internal order not  to cost center.(that is our requirement)
    While creating internal order i didnt maintain  any profit center bcoz cost center and profit centers are not ready yet for time being we are planning to move Employee cost to internal order later we will settle to Cost centers once its ready.
    Thanks & regards,
    Swapna.
    Edited by: swapnasudha chowdary on Jan 24, 2012 11:59 AM

  • Archive PO associated with Maintenance Order

    We have maintenance orders back to 2004 that have never been closed or had the delete flag set.  We would like to get these cleaned up.  Many of them have purchase orders attached to them.
    I ran MEMASSPO to set the final invoice indicator on the purchase orders that were hanging out there but when I tried to then close the orders and set the deletion flag I couldn't.  I would get an error that the PO still existed.  With production orders I would run RM06EV47 to set the delete flag on the PO then I would be able to close the production order.  This doesn't seem to be the case with maintenance orders.
    When I run RM06EV47 on the purchase orders that are associated with maintenance orders I get the message "Archive Run only flags Production Order POs. See BADI."
    I haven't been able to find anything regarding how to set the delete flag on these POs.  Can someone tell me what the process is?
    Thanks much,
    Andrea

    There is no relation between archiving PM Order & PO existence.
    When you make TECO & Business Completion of those orders, corresponding PR will get deletion flag.
    You can run SARA for Purchase Order as well as Maintenance Order archival which will set Deletion flag as well as archive those documents.
    Archive Purchase Orders
    Archiving Object for PO - MM_EKKO
    Archiving Object for Maintenance Order - PM_ORDER

Maybe you are looking for

  • My Windows 7 met some virus!!!!

    Hello, I am Zhaoguang Chang. At Canadian Boxing day in 2011, I bought Acer laptop. The operation syatem is windows 7. I like it very much. But recently my computer met some problems with virus. The internet explorer run very slowly. Now it can not ru

  • Compiling a CSS into SWF without merged SDK and dynamically loading

    I have a flex application that is built with the SDK merged in (for my own good reasons). This application dynamically loads a style SWF that was built without the SDK merged. Unfortunately, it seems that the loaded SWF fails to resolve its reference

  • Alarms not working in iOS8

    My weekday morning Wake-Up Alarms are not working.  I have 2 alarms set for 5:00AM and 5:20AM, both set to only go off on Weekdays. I am wondering if it is because of the Do Not Disturb from 11PM - 6 AM feature, that is on, but it worked fine on iOS

  • Hp130nr MAC os10.8.5

    I have a HP130nnr that is on an ethernet system that I use with a EFI RIP to print proofs.  I tried to install on my main MAC that is running OS 10.8.5.  Got an error message that the software is   not currently avaialable from he Software Update ser

  • An EDIFACT to XML Converter

    Hello, we are looking for an EDIFACT to XML Converter or an EDIFACT Converter which works against an Oracle 8i DB. We have to tranform an EDIFACT-Message either to XML and then put it into the DB or to a format that we can bring via PL/SQL into the D