Redefining a keyword?

there seem to be some strange bugs in CS 5 Dreamweaver! The first one is that every time I add a record set it replicates the second line in the source code, which is usually the include for my connection. Next – every time I add or remove a behavior Dreamweaver will erroneously rewrite portions of the source code and even drop certain lines, usually a dim statementfor when the connection string is "reset" – I think I can get around this problem is the following is allowed:
redef dim myvar if def not def myvar then realdim myvar else do nothing
How do I code that?
And finally here's a peculiar problem: if I create a record set (call it "Fred"), then delete that record set, and then try to re-create itI get told that the name is "already in use". So this leads to some very strange names for record sets – tester11111, tester2222222222, and so forth.
any suggestions?
Thank you.
Ross

There have been other threads on this topic, it seems to affect some people more than others and as far as I know there isn't a definite fix. I'm using CS4 and occasionally experience similar issues. also, I believe there's an update for C'S 5 which may help if you have not yet already installed it. Make backup copies of working pages before adding or deleting new behaviors, just in case. For double connection includes, just delete one. when you delete a recordset, check the code for any remnants left over - it probably isn't fully deleted if you're getting a message saying the name is already tataken. lastly, there are times when the code is correct, but the behaviors panel isn't reading it and you get exclamation points. In that case, closing andnreopening the page usually solves it.

Similar Messages

Merged iPhoto and Aperture Libraries - Faces Didn't Transfer

I merged my iPhoto library into my Aperture library and non of the Faces or Keywords from my iPhoto library transfered.
Any suggestions?
(There was an error when I merged the two and it said it had to repair the database when Aperture reopened. Should I try to merge the two again?)
Thanks!

I have a similar problem with my Aperture library after the 3.3.2 update, see:
Re: Aperture 3.3.2 Update: All faces are gone from my main Aperture library
Repair Library did not help; What brought the faces back for me was to rebuild the Aperture library, not repair. But before you try a rebuild, back up the Aperture library and test, if the backup is in working condition.
After rebuilding, Aperture may hang, when rebuilding the faces.db. Give it plenty of time to finish, best over night. If you have to force quit, you will need to run a repair afterwards.
As to missing keywords - my keywords were still there, but the keywords HUD stopped working - the keywords were not found, when being entered into the search field. This was solved after rebuilding.
One big problem with keywords in the unified library format is, that iPhoto does not support nested, hierarchical keywords. If your Aperture library contains hierarchichal keywords, say "Animals > Birds > Sparrow" and your iPhoto library has keywords "Birds" and "Sparrow", you will end up with duplicate keywords for "Birds" and "Sparrow" at different levels of the hierarchie and any smart album and keyword control set using these keywords will no longer work. You will have to delete your keyword sets, and to merge the duplicate keywords again in the Keywords HUD. Then apply at least one keyword new, to force writing of the keywords to the library, quit Aperture, log off and on again, if you are using MacOS X Lion, relaunch Aperture. Then redefine your keyword control sets and smart albums that are using keywords.
Regards
Léonie

Using IN keyword in an sql query in a view criteria

Hi,
I am using jdev 11.1.1.1.0 and defined an lov query/viewobject as
select a, b, c from myTable
I now need to predefine filtering for lov search functionality and need something like the following
select a, B, c from myTable where B in ('X','Y')
I could not find a way to do it (i.e. specify the use of IN Keyword) in the Create View Criteria dialog box. I tried to define OR, but is that the best way to redefine IN as i have a long list (the above is just an example)
(( ( (UPPER(B_FLAG) = UPPER('X') ) ) OR ( (UPPER(DISPLAY_FLAG) = UPPER('Y') ) ) ))

If you know how many variables are in your "in" You can just write this in the sql query of your VO:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe11jdev/ps1/ria_application/images/t136.gif
From this tutorial:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/obe/obe11jdev/ps1/ria_application/developriaapplication_long.htm#ah1

Redefine static method?

It seems that I cannot redefine a static method in a subclass in ABAP OO, right?
Is there a reason for that? Is this like this in other languages as well?

That's true. You cannot redefine static methods in ABAP OO.
I can add that a class that defines a public or protected static attribute shares this
attribute with all its subclasses.
Overriding static methods is possible for example in Java.
This simple piece of code illustrates this:
public class Super {
    public static String getNum(){
        return "I'm super";
     public static void main(String[] args) {
         System.out.println("Super: " + Super.getNum());
         System.out.println("Sub: " + Sub.getNum());
public class Sub extends Super{
    public static String getNum(){
        return "I'm not";
The output is:
Super: I'm super
Sub: I'm not
When overriding methods in Java you must remember that an instance method cannot override a static method, and a static method cannot hide an instance method.
In C# a static member can't be marked as 'override', 'virtual' or 'abstract'. But it it is possible to hide a base class static method in a sub-class by using the keyword 'new':
public class Super
public static void myMethod()
public class Sub: Super
public new static void myMethod()

Message no. IW056 Work center change -- default data redefined

Hi,
After EHP5 Upgrade. I am getting Message no. IW056 Work center change --> default data redefined during Maintenance Order Change (IW32). Please suggest me Is their any SAP Note or any Configuration setting to fix it.
Regards
Maheboob
Please use [Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)|Enterprise Asset Management (SAP EAM); forum for PM/CS specific topics
Edited by: Paul Meehan on Oct 25, 2011 11:56 AM

Hi Maheboob
Im glad the note worked -
To find the note , you could do a note search on the message IW056 you received and the support pack level you are on ..
For EHP5 the note is valid up to SAPKH60504.
The IW056 is listed as a keyword so if you search on it the note should be returned.
Thanks-
Enda.

(RFE) Intoduce a new keyword Self

The Self keyword represent the type of the current Class.
Example :
class A {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println(Self.class); // print A
Note that It's not equivalent to this.getClass().
The Self keyword permit to resolve two problems :
1) methods of class from API create before 1.5 that return an Object like clone()
in Date couldn't return a Date (or the current class) because it could exist
a class that inherits from Date a redefine clone().
Usage as a type :
- Self could not be used as a parameter type.
- Seft could be used as a return type.
Rules during overriding test :
- Self is a subtype of Self
- Self is equals to the greater supertypes in the class hierachy that
defined the method.
class Object {
Self clone() {...}
class Date extends Object {
Self clone() {....} // ok, Self is a subtype of Self
class MyLegacyDate extends Date {
Object clone() {...} // ok, Self is equals to Object
2) there is no way to get the current class object (Class), to initialize a logger
by example. I propose the notation "Self.class".
R�mi Forax

I choose the option 3:
the code : > Bar bar=bar.getRubbed(); won't compile because getRubbed() return a Foo. (a Self from Foo) .What about
<T extends Bar> void rub(T t) {
Bar b = t.getRubbed()
Maybe Bar should be declared abstract because it does not implement Bar getRubbed() ...
About the clone() method, it should be noted that (according to the JavaDocs) it not an absolute requirement that
o.getClass() == o.clone().getClass().
Therefor, using Self as the return type of clone() would not be appropriate.

Applescript "some" keyword

This Applescript line
open some file of folder "[folderPathName]"
displays a random-choice jpg from a folder containing only jpgs, and works well – except that it always chooses the same “random” files, starting with one particular file and then going through the exact same sequence of “random” selections every time.
Restarting the Mac resets the sequence. The first time this line is called after a restart, it begins with that same first “random” selection and goes through the same sequence.
Am I misundersanding the some keyword? Does it need a “seed” to make it fully random?
Thank you.

FIrst, try resetting the PRAM. As far as I can think, the most likely cause of this effect would be that the system is seeding its random number generator with the exact same 32/64-bit integer at startup. That speaks to something being off at a very low level, which a PRAM reset might shake loose.
If that doesn't solve the problem, could you explain precisely what you do to make this happen - i.e., give us the whole script (it it's not too long) and tell us how and when it gets launched? There are only three other ways I can think of to get this effect, and they are all far-fetched:
You run this applescript so early in the startup process that the system hasn't been fully initialized.
You've added a bad or outdated third-party scripting addition that's interfering with the way applescript works.
You're running the command in a context that has (somehow) redefined the some keyword.
I'm betting on the PRAM thing, though, because everything else is a bit crazy.

Easy way to add a single keyword to an image?

I just organized a bunch of photos I took at a birthday party, and ran into some awkwardness when keywording. Hopefully it's just user ignorance, but if not, maybe someone can offer a workaround. I did the import with no keywords, because I wasn't thinking. Once I'd done that, I selected all images in the "Last Import", hit Ctrl-K, and typed Birthday (which is one of my standard keywords). Then I deselected all images and started doing selective keywording. That's where it started getting awkward. I had several shots that had my son in them, so I selected all of them and hit Ctrl-K. This put my cursor in the keyword box in the right-side panel, with Birthday highlighted. I hit <End>, then typed comma and MySonsName. No problem so far. I delselected the shots and selected the ones that had my daughter in them. The right-side keyword panel now showed something like "Birthday*, MySonsName*". I wasn't sure whether I could just add MyDaughtersName to the images without actually adding MySonsName to all selected images (even those without my son in them). That's the awkward part. What I found was that in order to add a single keyword to a bunch of images at once, I had to enable Keyword Stamping and use that. An alternative was to "Set Keyword Shortcut", enter the keyword, select the images I wanted, and then use "K" to add the shortcutted keyword to the images. Is there any way to simply say "add this keyword to all selected images" in one atomic action? In other words, hit a keystroke, type the keyword, hit Enter, and it's now applied to all selected images. -- Rob Freundlich "Males ae biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes." - Newt Gingrich "Some folks you don't have to satirize, you just quote 'em." - Tom Paxton

<[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected].. > In the right hand keyword pane the list should show something like "birthday, > *sonsname". The * means that the keyword isn't >applied to all the images. > > To add your daughter's name to the selected images, just add it to the end of > the list and press return. As long as you don't >remove the * you won't apply your son's name to all the images. if you do >remove the *, then you will. Sweet. I'm a programmer, so I thought the * meant multiple images, not "not all images", so I didn't even think of trying that. Works like a charm, though. Thanks! -- Rob Freundlich "Males ae biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes." - Newt Gingrich "Some folks you don't have to satirize, you just quote 'em." - Tom Paxton

Lightroom Upgrade at a client - sucess? - keyword problem deal breaker

Hi
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went.
Background: The client is a professional photographer specialized on garden photography. Her customers are gardening and lifestyle magazines who publish her photos regularly as illustrations to various articles. She has a professional Canon EOS 1Ds MK III equipment and shoots exclusively raw. In a shoot around 300 to 1000 images are shot. The Lightroom catalog has around 20,000 images currently.
In Lightroom she uses mostly DAM and some basic development features, images are delivered either as raw of as JPEG images to the clients. Keywording is especially important. She has an extensive hierarchical list of plants most of them multiword keywords with spaces, and lots of other keywords indicating if images were sent to clients and other stuff.
The upgrade went just very well. I exported the catalog to a new intermediate catalog without previews, installed LR3 and imported this intermediate catalog into LR3 generating new previews from scratch. The hardware is modest, and some functional tests (especially switching images in develop, spot tool, and adjustment brushes) revealed that everything performs well enough.
Then she asked me where she would have benefits from using the new version. And then I told the whole benefit story, which can be read everywhere.
- New process version, better details and noise reduction. She asked where she can see it? Hmm, I switched to 1:1 view changing the process versions, not really much to see on Canon 1Ds Mk III files. Even with noisier files, it was hard to tell, what has actually changed. So only a 4:1 view very tiny changes were visible. The impact on her business? Near to nothing as she does not print large. The differences would hardly be seen in the magazine prints.
- Lens corrections and perspective control: does not really matter in garden photography, but she could see some occasional usefullness.
- Publish services: no real need for it
- Print packages: nope
- Slightshow improvements: no use for it
- Performance improvements: nothing visible
- Effects: completely superfluous
- New import dialog: at first glance a hindereance, as she has to get used to it
Then she asked: did they correct the keyword handling, when entering keywords witrh spaces? (You know the nasty bug, where keyword completion is broken at keywords with spaces). We checked (I knew it wasn't fixed), and of course she was heavily disappointed. Thus, after 2 years of development nothing new for her, keyword bug not fixed? Of course she said, that I should tell her, when keyword completion works, then and only then would she consider an upgrade.
So, despite all the bells and whistles about the new version, I doubt that for many photographers the benefits are really so overwhelming in the real world. It is a pitty that Adobe continues to neglect the DAM features (some fresh ideas for client management would be great), that existing features aren't consequently implemented (esp. the possibilities to query the catalog, and keywording), and that existing bugs are constantly ignored and not fixed.
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend useless. Please listen!
Disclaimer: As I am not a professional for me the situation is not the same. I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher, who needs a proper asset management. I recommended Lightroom to her because of the overall package (she moved from Cumulus), so I feel a little obliged to help her in this issue. In my case, as a user of a modest Lumix G camera system, I would consider the IQ benefits more signifcant. I don't know, if this is a general observation.
Kind regards
Thomas

W.W. Webster wrote:
tgutgu wrote:
Just a small report, on how upgrading a client's LR 2 catalog went ...
So, please Adobe, get keyword completion fixed for keywords with spaces immediately !!! This is what professionals need. A catalog without reliable DAM features, renders the catalog concept to a great extend (sic) useless. Please listen!
I just report my experience I had, with a photgrapher (sic), who needs a (sic) proper asset management.
So the over-riding conclusion from your experience with just one photographer is that Lightroom is 'useless', and this compels you to demand, in bold type, that Adobe must listen?
That Lightroom has issues and areas for ongoing development is obvious, and Adobe won't dispute this. But rants like yours add nothing and are unhelpful. Julie's response is extremely tactful and far more moderate than your post deserves.
Dear Mr. Webster
I think when you post, you should definitely change your tone. Julie simply answered my original post by acknowledging the problem, your accusation that I did not use appropriate "netiquette" is ridiculous. Posts like yours are a real problem of this forum.
I simply gave a user story example to show that not for everybody the shiny advertised new features provide real benefits and that paying attention to a thorough implementation of features can be equally important. I think Julie has recognized this. And the issue is nothing for ongoing developments. Lightroom supports keywords with spaces, so it has to be done consequently. Keywording is essential for DAM. If keywording gets too tedious or leads to wrong keyword assignments, then DAM is really pointless.
The intention of my post was to point Adobe to an apparently small problem, which has quite a big impact to people, who depend on good DAM features. The issue is nothing new, existed since the first release of Lightroom, but nothing was done about it, unfortunately. Now that Lightroom addressed keywords with spaces even with a new preference setting, it was fair to assume, that they had done something about it with care. This isn't so obviously. The issue was discussed in previous threads, but did not get any visible notice from Adobe. I am glad that this has changed now with Julie's post.
In no way did I say that Lightroom is useless or even that I regard it to be so. I merely said that the catalog concept is to a great extend (not completely) useless, if its implementation is sloppy. DAM starts with data entry and only after doing this, you can use it to your benefit. Therefore it has to be efficient, which currently is not. Lightroom is criticized by a large number of users that it is forcing them into a catalog system instead of just providing access to the file system. Long existing bugs like this, likely proves them right in their view.
The competition (I mean complete workflow solutions) is not really better than Lightroom with respect to DAM features, however, my take is, that the developers should be equally ambitious with the quality of the catalog system as they are with IQ, especially if the achievements in IQ are apparently less relevant to owners of high end camera systems. (I could be wrong with the last statement, but it would be interesting to hear if others have similar observations).
Kind regards
Thomas
Thomas

Does Bridge only Filter/Search Keywords in one folder at a time?

It seems the "Filter" feature in CS6 Bridge will only search keywords in a single opened folder. What if I have multiple folders for image downloads, one per day, in a parent folder for the month, or even a year? Can I use Bridge to filter images in a folder containing other folders?
If not, is there another search strategy I can use to quickly filter images in multiple folders? Thanks.

You can select a root folder, and then select Show Items from Subfolders from the View menu. That adds all contained files to the Content panel, from which you can filter.
If you need more control, you can use Find instead, where you can also do AND/OR operations too, but takes a little more patience.

How can I integrate metadata and keywords in Lightroom with those in Photoshop, Bridge, and Photoshop Elements? In other words, is there a way to retrieve common metadata templates from all modules? Thanks!

Keyword and Metadata Integration throughout Adobe Modules

Thanks! That's helpful.
What I mean by "common metadata", is a unified, updated, most current metadata, which I could update in each program. That is without overwriting the metadata, but appending new keywords to the metadata I created in the previous program.
I use Bridge, then Lightroom and finally Photoshop. That's the regular workflow: Bridge for preliminary sorting and and adding some keywords; Lightroom for organizing and picking the best images; finally, Photoshop for processing. I got Photoshop Elements on trial. Doesn't work for my purposes.
I need to share and update the metadata / keywords when I go from one program into another. Can't retrieve metadata I set up in Bridge into Lightroom. Same happens with Photoshop, where I can't retrieve keywords I add in Lightroom. It's tedious to write up the keywords again.
Thanks for your efforts!

Using iPhote Keywords with PS Elements and visa-versa

Howdy,
Does anyone know if you can xfer (import/export) iPhoto keywords to PS Elements 4 or Photo Bridge and visa-versa?
Or do you have to create a new Keyword list with Photo Bridge and PS Elements 4

MV:
You can use iView MediaPro in the Demo mode to catalog your iPhoto LIbrary and then sync (write) the keywords back to the original file. That will permit other applications to read those annotations in the source file. Check out Tutorial #1 here. The methodology is there to do what you want even though it's geared for a different issue.
G5 Dual Core 2G, 2G RAM, 22 Display, 250G HD, 250G FW HD, QT 7.0.4P Mac OS X (10.4.5) Canon S400, i850 & LIDE 50, Epson R200, 2G Nano

In Adobe Bridge, how can I display keywords in their hierarchy, do an "aka" keyword assignment, and perform multi-value keyword searches?

Hi Bridge Geniuses!
I need your help. I am using Bridge to sort and keyword a pretty big photo archive. I have created a pretty long nested hierarchy (4 layers deep, max) and, for a few reasons, would like the parent tags to be automatically included when I indicate a sub-tag. The problem I have now is that the keyword list is distractingly long and organized alphabetically. My first question is this: is there a preference setting in Bridge that will ask the program to display the keywords in their hierarchy? That is, will Bridge present the list as, for example, cars à hybrids à Toyotas à Prius.
My second question is: if I have two or more names that represent the same keyword, is there an “aka” function in this program that will allow me to direct searches for two or more different words to the same keyword entry? (For example, if I want my searches for “Bruce Wayne” to also show entries marked as “Batman.”)
Finally, I would like to know if Bridge will perform keyword searches for more than one word at a time. So far, I have tried entering two keywords with overlap at a time, separated by a space or a comma or a semicolon, and the search comes up empty.
Thank you very much for your help!

I reset my custom workspace and all seems to be well now. My keywords now show, the number of photos each applies to and I can again search.
Thank you.

Images not displaying at their normal size, and not all keywords displaying, why?

Not sure what's going on inside Adobe Bridge CC 2014.1, but why is it that my images are not displaying at full size. Bridge says they're displaying at 100% but I know that's not the case, because when I open the same images in Mac OS Preview (OS 10.10.1 Yosemite) at 100% they're much bigger. Is there a viewing preference setting I'm missing?
Also, I use Bridge and Photoshop on two mac pro desktops: one at my office and one at home.
At work, I created more than 30 keywords in Bridge for several hundred images that reside on my external thunderbolt hard drive. But when I take that hard drive home and connected it to my home mac and then open Bridge, only a handful of keywords appear. I don't see the full list of keywords that I created at work. But in Bridge, I didn't see any option to save or export keywords as a file.
Although the image metadata does appear, because whatever keyword i assigned to an image at work does display on the home mac, I just don't see the entire keyword list.
Can or should Bridge therefore only be used on one computer? Is it not possible to transfer the entire Bridge keyword list from one mac to another?
Thanks in advance for any help feedback with this.

Hi Zenos,
I've discovered what is causing the problem, but I still need a way to fix it, if possible.
The cause of the problem is that in Windows 7 Control Panel > Display I have set the size of "text and other items" to 150% (otherwise everything is much too small too read on my screen's recommended resolution of 1920×1080).
I discovered that Irfan Viewer was also displaying at the incorrect resolution, but I managed to solve that problem by right-clicking on the IrfanView.exe icon and following Properties > Compatibility and selecting "Disable display scaling on high DPI settings".
I tried the same procedure with Thunderbird, but it made no difference. It is still displaying at the incorrect resolution.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Catsix

Keywords in Adobe Bridge CC and Lightroom 5 not working

I recently upgraded to Adobe CC. We use Bridge and Lightroom regularly to tether while shooting, batch process and search for images. I have noticed that files I have keyworded in Bridge will randomly lose the keywords attributed with them. When we shoot tethered to lightroom we will keyword as we shoot but those keywords do not show up in Bridge. This is a huge issue for us. We have thousands of images and plan on using bridge as a tool for our designers and marketing team to search seamlessly for photos based on keywords. If they are randomly disappearing or not carrying through from Lightroom to Bridge it becomes completely unmanageable and completely out of our hands. And a completely useless tool. Any suggestions?

Keyword list in Adobe system, bridge and lightroom, need standardizing. That's what I feel.

Redefining a keyword?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for