Redhat or suse linux installation on lenovo g560

Hi,
I have a linovo g560 with os window xp,now i want to install redhat linux,also tried to install suse linux on my laptop with cd.but after some screen and runnibg kernel the cd drive and hard drive detection gets failed.and the installation mode goes to manual with install driver screen.i tried every driver but cd not get detected setup always say insert cd 1 into drive press any key when ready something this type of message.there are also eject cd button but that don,t work.i tried to text mode also but same situation for that mode also.i am not having more linux experience can anyone please help and suggest me to how to install redhat on my system redhat version 4 enterprise edition i am using for installation i have another cd of suse ver 10 but none of them get install,cd drive detection get failed
thanks in advance

If you have a pendrive, you can use Universal USB Installer to copy all files into it, and install Linux.
Look this page: http://www.pendrivelinux.com/universal-usb-installer-easy-as-1-2-3/
IPnaSh
First Spanish Community Guru - Colaborador ad honorem

Similar Messages

  • Adobe AIR on RedHat and SUSE Linux

    Hi,
    I am trying to install AIR 2.5 runtime on RedHat Linux and SUSE Linux . When I try to do it on RedHat, I get the following error:
    error while loading shared libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
    Can anyone help me fix it. I assume I will get something on the same lines on SUSE as well? Also, has anyone successfully done what I am trying to do? I can see that Adobe AIR page doesn't mention RHEL and SUSE (but openSUSE) supported, but still.
    Thank you!
    -Amit

    The only version that works on RHEL 5 is 2.0.4. Check this thread for more details:
    http://www.cherpec.com/2010/12/adobe-air-2-5-1-glibc_2-7-error/
    It works as I tested on RHEL 5. But to ship AIR heelp to customers, this is for sure not a solution.

  • RedHat or Suse Linux?

    Hi.
    Our company has to choose one of the following OS:
    1. Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3
    2. Suse Enterprise Server 8
    for our new Oracle9i DB server. Can someone suggest one and explain why he choose that? Is there any web site where I can find some tests to compare this two products?
    Thanks.

    Hi
    I am using Oracle With SuSE for last 2 years .I have seen the following advantages
    SuSe have a very good Oracle on SuSE Linux forum which have lot of participants
    some very useful RPMs for automatic startup and shutdown and for setting kernel parameters during startup.
    Installation was always easy and no crashes at all .
    Currently I am running SLES8 and oracle 9iR2 (database and apps server ) with Async-IO
    The only problem I found was hyperthreading CPUs but that may generic to all distributions
    HTH
    Santhosh

  • Unable to boot new Linux installation on Lenovo G400

    I am having problems installing Linux Mint 16 to a Lenovo G400 that I recently purchased here in China. I have an older Lenovo that I have had for several years, and have been quite pleased with it so I thought I would get another. I gave up on Windows several years ago, and have been running exclusively Linux, mostly Ubuntu or Mint, ever since. I have heard and read things about how Microsoft seems to be fighting back to restrict the spread of Linux, so I took a Live USB stick of Linux Mint 16 so I could see if start it with any machine that I was interested in.
    The machine I tested my USB stick on worked fine, so I sent them to the warehouse to get a fresh one in a box. My problems started when they came back from the warehouse with another model, newer, with a faster processor, and pre-installed Linux. I entered the data required to complete the setup, and played around with the Linpus OS a bit before deciding to take that machine instead of the other. My thinking was that I could replace Linpus with Mint later. I did not try booting from my USB stick before agreeing to take this machine.
    Later, after trying out Linpus and deciding I had a strong preference for a Debian derivative, I had trouble setting the boot order, but resolved that by finding a copy of the user guide in English. When I tried to boot from the USB, the first thing I noticed was that anything I tried to run from a Live USB stick would not function in standard or default mode. The menu would come up, I would select the default or standard mode, and the system would start to load but a few seconds later the screen would go black. The USB continued to flash for a while but the screen stays black.
    At first I noticed this problem with Gparted, which would not run in default or failsafe mode, but does run in safe graphic mode. Similarly, with Mint 16, the live USB will only start in compatibility mode. Later there were several other live systems that I have tried with similar results. Almost all of the live systems I tried ran in their equivalent of the compatibility mode. The one exception to that was Boot-Repair-Disk, which I could not get to work at all in the 64-Bit edition. The 32-Bit edition did work, in their equivalent of compatibility mode, but it told me I needed the 64-Bit Edition because EFI was detected.
    When I succeeded in getting the Gparted and Mint 16 live USBs to function in non-default modes I decided to go ahead with my repartitioning and installation plans. This may have been my second mistake. Maybe I should have taken this machine back, but I didn't.
    With my Live USB of Gparted running in Safe Graphic mode, I found 6 partitions on the HDD: sda1 is FAT 32 and labeled boot; sda2 is an unknown file system and labeled bios_grub. Both of these partitions are 500 Mb, and I left them alone. I also left sda3 untouched, which is labeled linux-swap. Sda4, sda5 and sda6 I re-sized and re-formated to use as two / partitions and a shared /home.
    I then installed Mint 16 in sda4 with sda6 as home. I left the GRUB intallation in the default setting, sda. The installation seemed to go alright, but when I try to boot I just see Lenovo and then the screen goes black. It does seem like the system may be loading and I just can't see it, but that is only a guess. I don't see anything that looks like the GRUB screen and so there is no way to use compatibility mode. Using Gparted from a Live USB suggests that the installation worked and there are files there.
    I have searched on the web and have been unable to find anything that helps. Obviously, I am not an expert, but I have installed Linux quite a few times and never experienced anything like this. But then I am used to starting from a clean disk.
    I am very tempted to delete the two partitions that I left in place and try an installation like I am used to doing. But I do not know anything about EFI, and my hard drive is listed in BIOS setup as an EFI HDD Device, so I don't know if my machine would still work if I delete these partitions.
    So I am very much in need of some advice on this and I wonder if anyone can please offer me some guidance. And perhaps I should add a few more details, such as: USB Legacy is enabled; Boot Mode is set at Legacy Support ; Boot Priority is Legacy First ; USB Boot is Enabled; and my BIOS Version is 78CN25WW(V2.03).
    I am sorry to go on so long, but I have tried to be thorough, thank you.

    Hi, the W520 has ACPI and powermanegement issues on kernels < 2.6.39 without specific patches. Two questions:
    What version of (K)Ubuntu are you trying to run?
    What is the setting of your graphics system in the BIOS? Most of the time, setting it to Integrated just works fine, the open source Intel driver is quite good. When setting it to Discrete, you can either use the open source Nouveau drivers for the Nvidia card or the Nvidia proprietary binary drivers, all with varying success. At the moment I would not recommend setting it to Optimus, since support with Bumblebee is work in progress and quite tricky to handle. I am not sure what the Live CD is trying to do, but test it with graphics set to integrated first. Because of all the manual tweaking necessary two month ago I switched from Ubuntu to Gentoo, rolled a new kernel and never looked back. See my thread about HowTo Running Linux on the W520:
    http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Linux-Discussion/HowTo-Running-Linux-on-W520/td-p/453327
    W520|4282-W16|2720QM|16GB|Q1000M|FHD|500GB|UMTS|BIOS 1.26|Gentoo Linux/2.6.39-r3|Win7-64-Prof|

  • Connection problem in Linux systems: redhat and suse

    I install Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition 9.0 in RedHat and SuSE linux in my intranet with wondows XP.
    The servers run correctly in both RedHat and SuSE systems. That means in each system, I can use: http://localhost:8080 or their ip address to access the servers, for example, http://192.168.0.5:8080.
    However, in the windowsXP computers, I cannot access the servers running in both Linux systems by using their ip address (for example, http://192.168.0.5:8080). In addition, in RedHat, I cannot access the application server running in SuSE and vice versa.
    The network works correctly as I can use SSH to log in both RedHat and SuSE linux by using their ip address.
    And in both RedHat and SuSE, I can access the application server running in windows XP computer.
    I thought the problem came from the configuration of the linux. But I donot how to solve it.
    Could anyone give me some suggestions?
    Thanks a lot.
    Kevin

    iliasver wrote:
    Hello. I have huge problem with my blackberry z10 device. I bought my device six months ago from Greece which mostly I live there and they told me that this device is unlocked. I used my device with most of all three mobile networks in Greece and it works just perfect. Now that I am in Canada fro work and I must stay a lot, my device does not work on any mobile network of Canada. Specifically I'm at manitoba province and I have not find yet some a one to help me about my problems. Every mobile network I test does not work properly. From the most of them they tell me that my device does not use the frequency band that use north American, and some of them tells me that my device is not fully unlocked. Is that possible? My device have fully unlocked, medium unlocked and fully locked systems? Does anybody knows what to do to fix it? And how you figure this out that my device is locked or unlocked, cause every single video I saw it seems to me that my device is unlocked. Thanks and hope someone to give an answer to my problem.
    Can't be used, wrong frequency. Canada, North America and half of South America use GSM 850 / 1900 MHz.
    Rest of the world use GSM 900 / 1800 MHz.

  • Linux installation problem on D20

    Hi, guys,
    I am trying to install Redhat Linux x86_64 5.3 on D20 with a Marvell 88SE63xx/64xx SAS controller. As the Linux installer cannot recognize the SAS controller, I download a driver of Marvell mv64xx for Redhat x86_64 5.2 from Lenovo driver matrix website. Unfortunately, no matter how I follow the instruction to load the driver, the so-called mv64xx doesn't drive the Marvel 88SE63xx/64xx SAS controller in D20, so that the Redhat 5.3 Linux installer cannot find any hard drive. This is ridiculous and ironic because I got 5 SAS 15rpm hard drives in D20. Does anyone know how to resolve this problem and get Redhat Linux 5.3 installed on D20 with SAS drives?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    hello, good news everyone
    today i tested the upcoming kernel 2.6.31-1 with ubuntu server x64  (9.10 / karmic)
    and what can i say?
    [    2.536365] mvsas 0000:01:00.0: mvsas: driver version 0.8.2
    [    2.536374] mvsas 0000:01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
    [    2.536379] mvsas 0000:01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
    [    2.537283] mvsas 0000:01:00.0: mvsas: PCI-E x4, Bandwidth Usage: 2.5 Gbps
    [    7.769579] scsi7 : mvsas
    [    7.769954] /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c 380hy 2 byte dmaded.
    [    7.770674] /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/drivers/scsi/mvsas/mv_sas.c 1365:found dev[0:5] is gone.
    [    7.778539] ata7.00: ATA-7: WDC WD5000AAKS-00TMA0, 12.01C01, max UDMA/133
    [    7.778543] ata7.00: 976773168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48 NCQ (depth 31/32)
    [    7.779378] ata7.00: configured for UDMA/133
    [    7.779426] scsi 7:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      WDC WD5000AAKS-0 12.0 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
    the kernel included the mvsas module and its dependant, and ran out of the box doing anything. and yes, it's a software raid, the bios offers raid 5 and 10, but they are greyed out. okay, my graphic is now broken with 2.6.31-1, but hey, the 5 port's are working i almost forgot where i have put the 500gb disk. hdparm -tT showed 7.8gb/s buffered and 77mb/s normal read, which is normal for the drive. 
    because of the nature of a module, i believe you have to compile a kernel with support of mvsas on your own to boot linux from it, or you use the ich10 - only for optical drives - sata port, which works fine with the intel x25-m ssd.
    Message Edited by docc on 07-02-2009 12:06 AM

  • Oracle 10g Installation Problem on SUSE Linux 10

    Hello Friends,
    I want to install SAP Solution Manager 7.0 with Oracle 10g on SUSE Linux 10.0.
    But, while starting the Installation i am getting following Errors.
    Starting Oracle Universal Installer...
    Checking installer requirements...
    Checking operating system version: must be redhat-3, SuSE-9, redhat-4, UnitedLinux-1.0, asianux-1,
    asianux-2 or SuSE-10
                                          Passed
    All installer requirements met.
    Preparing to launch Oracle Universal Installer from /tmp/OraInstall2009-04-22_03-59-38PM. Please wait ...
    Error in writing to directory /tmp/OraInstall2009-04-22_03-59-38PM. Please ensure that this directory is
    writable and has atleast 60 MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue.
    : Success
    I have checked the Permissions and the Size of /tmp Directory, which is as followed:
    drwxr-xr-x  11 root root    0 2009-04-22 21:19 sys
    drwxrwxrwt  52 root root 1824 2009-04-22 16:00 tmp
    drwxr-xr-x  15 root root  408 2009-04-19 14:43 usr
    Filesystem           1K-blocks      Used Available Use% Mounted on
    /dev/sda10             2104376     73112   2031264   4% /tmp
    I am starting the Oracle 10g Installation within orasm7 User which is a member of dba, users, disk groups.
    The directories which are created upon starting the Oracle Installation in /tmp directory are having the situations as followed:
    drwxr-xr-x 3 orasm7   dba          128 2009-04-21 18:41 OraInstall2009-04-21_06-41-14PM
    drwxr-xr-x 3 orasm7   dba          128 2009-04-21 18:41 OraInstall2009-04-21_06-41-25PM
    drwxr-xr-x 3 orasm7   dba          128 2009-04-22 15:59 OraInstall2009-04-22_03-59-38PM
    The Oracle Installation log is as follwoed:
    Using paramFile: /home/MyData/51031676/database/install/oraparam.ini
    Checking installer requirements...
    Checking operating system version: must be redhat-3, SuSE-9, redhat-4, UnitedLinux-1.0, asianux-1, asianux-2 or SuSE-10
                                          Passed
    All installer requirements met.
    The commandline for unzip:
    /home/MyData/51031676/database/install/unzip -qqq ../stage/Components/oracle.swd.jre/1.4.2.0.8
    /1/DataFiles/\*.jar -d /tmp/OraInstall2009-04-22_03-59-38PM
    I have set DISPLAY variable in this way before starting Installation:
    DISPLAY=$HOSTNAME:0.0
    export DISPLAY
    I tried to search the solution over the internet for this kind of problem, but i am not able to find its solution. Even i tried to start the Orale installation using this parameter: ./runInstaller ignoreSysPrereqs, but still it is giving the same unexpected error.
    I have a doubt on File/Directory permissions which are created for Installation in /tmp. The umask setiing of the system is 0022.
    Please, help me for this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Bhavik G. Shroff

    Hi Markus,
    How are you ?
    Thank you very much for your reply.
    I was executing wrong runInstaller file. RUNINSTALLER is right file for starting the execution. But still i am facing the same error, which is as followed.
    Preparing response files. Please wait:
    ======================================
    Working on /home/MyData/51031676/database/SAP/SVRCUSTOM.RSP
    /home/MyData/51031676/database/SAP/SVRCUSTOM.RSP --> /tmp/.orainst_rsp.27450: Done
    Starting Oracle Universal Installer...
    Checking installer requirements...
    Checking operating system version: must be redhat-3, SuSE-9, redhat-4, UnitedLinux-1.0, asianux-1, asianux-2 or SuSE-10
                                          Passed
    All installer requirements met.
    Preparing to launch Oracle Universal Installer from /home/orasm7/tmpora/OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM. Please wait ...
    Error in writing to directory /home/orasm7/tmpora/OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM. Please ensure that
    this directory is writable and has atleast 60 MB of disk space. Installation cannot continue.
    : Success
    SHROFF:~ # cd /home/orasm7/tmpora/
    SHROFF:/home/orasm7/tmpora # ll
    total 0
    drwxr-xr-x 3 orasm7 dba 128 Apr 22 17:25 OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM
    SHROFF:/home/orasm7/tmpora # cd OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM/
    SHROFF:/home/orasm7/tmpora/OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM # ll
    total 4
    drwxr-xr-x 2 orasm7 dba 304 Apr 22 17:25 images
    -rwxr-xr-x 1 orasm7 dba 504 Apr 22 17:25 installActions2009-04-22_05-25-26PM.log
    SHROFF:/home/orasm7/tmpora/OraInstall2009-04-22_05-25-26PM #
    I have a doubt on tmp_netca_file & tmp_dbca_file variable.
    Please give your suggestion for the same.
    Regards,
    Bhavik G. Shroff
    Edited by: Bhavik G. Shroff on Apr 22, 2009 2:10 PM

  • Error while Oracle 10g  Installation suse linux

    Hi,
    All i am facing issue while installing Oracle 10g release 2 on open suse.
    All test are getting passed but getting a error reltated to ip address as follows.
    INFO: Checking DetectIfDHCPAssignedIP
    This is a prerequisite condition to test whether the primary IP address of the system is DHCP-assiged or static.
    INFO: Detecting the IP.....:10.31.215.64
    INFO: Checking the network interface display name.... :eth0
    INFO: Checking the network reference name..... :eth0
    INFO: Checking the platform .......46
    INFO: Checking the LINUX vendor .... :SuSE
    INFO: Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Not executed <<<<
    Also while installing getting error as,
    Checking Network Configuration requirements ...
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Not executed <<<<
    Recommendation: Oracle supports installations on systems with DHCP-assigned public
    IP addresses. However, the primary network interface on the system should be
    configured with a static IP address in order for the Oracle Software to function
    properly. See the Installation Guide for more details on installing the software
    on systems configured with DHCP.
    Please help me to resolve issue.
    BR,
    Rajesh
    Edited by: Rajesh.Rathod on Dec 20, 2010 12:52 AM

    Hi,
    I tried to follow each step of oracle documentation but network configuration requirement is failing.
    please find following log.
    Checking operating system requirements ...
    Expected result: One of redhat-3,redhat-4,SuSE-9
    Actual Result: SuSE-9
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking operating system package requirements ...
    Checking for make-3.79; found make-3.81-128.14.     Passed
    Checking for binutils-2.14; found binutils-2.19.51-10.26.4.     Passed
    Checking for gcc-3.2; found gcc-4.4-4.2.     Passed
    Checking for libaio-0.3.96; found libaio-0.3.104-144.2.     Passed
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking kernel parameters
    Checking for semmsl=250; found semmsl=1250.     Passed
    Checking for semmns=32000; found semmns=32000.     Passed
    Checking for semopm=100; found semopm=100.     Passed
    Checking for semmni=128; found semmni=256.     Passed
    Checking for shmmax=536870912; found shmmax=3294967296.     Passed
    Checking for shmmni=4096; found shmmni=4096.     Passed
    Checking for shmall=2097152; found shmall=2097152.     Passed
    Checking for file-max=65536; found file-max=131072.     Passed
    Checking for VERSION=2.6.5-7.201; found VERSION=2.6.31.5-0.1-desktop.     Passed
    Checking for ip_local_port_range=1024 - 65000; found ip_local_port_range=1024 - 65000.     Passed
    Checking for rmem_default=262144; found rmem_default=4194304.     Passed
    Checking for rmem_max=262144; found rmem_max=4194304.     Passed
    Checking for wmem_default=262144; found wmem_default=262144.     Passed
    Checking for wmem_max=262144; found wmem_max=262144.     Passed
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking Recommended glibc version
    Expected result: ATLEAST=2.3.3-98.28
    Actual Result: 2.10.1-10.4
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking physical memory requirements ...
    Expected result: 922MB
    Actual Result: 5460MB
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking available swap space requirements ...
    Expected result: 5460MB
    Actual Result: 10244MB
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking Network Configuration requirements ...
    Actual Result: :java.lang.NullPointerException:Exception/Error Occurred
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Not executed <<<<
    Recommendation: Oracle supports installations on systems with DHCP-assigned public IP addresses. However, the primary network interface on the system should be configured with a static IP address in order for the Oracle Software to function properly. See the Installation Guide for more details on installing the software on systems configured with DHCP.
    =======================================================================
    Validating ORACLE_BASE location (if set) ...
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking Oracle Home path for spaces...
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking for proper system clean-up....
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking for Oracle Home incompatibilities ....
    Actual Result: NEW_HOME
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Passed
    =======================================================================
    Checking Network Configuration requirements ...
    Actual Result: :java.lang.NullPointerException:Exception/Error Occurred
    Check complete. The overall result of this check is: Not executed <<<<
    Recommendation: Oracle supports installations on systems with DHCP-assigned public IP addresses. However, the primary network interface on the system should be configured with a static IP address in order for the Oracle Software to function properly. See the Installation Guide for more details on installing the software on systems configured with DHCP.
    =======================================================================
    Please suggest how to resolve.

  • NetWeaver 2004s installation problem on Suse Linux

    Hi,
    I downloaded NetWeaver 2004s 90 days version from SDN and installed on Suse linux. I am not able to execute command to get the license after installation. Here is the line I executed
    add user n4sadm
    unpacking adm_env.tar.bz2
    Changing password for n4sadm.
    New Password:
    Bad password: it is based on a dictionary word
    Reenter New Password:
    Password changed.
    add user sdb
    Changing password for sdb.
    New Password:
    Bad password: it is based on a dictionary word
    Reenter New Password:
    Password changed.
    add user sqdn4s
    unpacking sqd_env.tar.bz2
    Changing password for sqdn4s.
    New Password:
    Bad password: it is based on a dictionary word
    Reenter New Password:
    Password changed.
    unpacking /mnt/iso/server/TAR/x86_64/SAPDB_I.tar.bz2
    unpacking /mnt/iso/server/TAR/x86_64/SAPDB_II.tar.bz2
    unpacking /mnt/iso/server/TAR/x86_64/SAPDB_III.tar.bz2
    unpacking /mnt/iso/server/TAR/x86_64/SAPN4S.tar.bz2
    Service visinet-gui on port 3601/tcp was deactivated...
    Service cpq-tasksmart on port 3201/tcp was deactivated...
    Service netxms-mgmt on port 4701/tcp was deactivated...
    Service iwec on port 4801/tcp was deactivated...
    Service tick-port on port 3200/tcp was deactivated...
    Service netxms-agent on port 4700/tcp was deactivated...
    Service iims on port 4800/tcp was deactivated...
    Update the necessary information in sysctl.conf:
    kernel.shmmax = 23136829430
    kernel.shmall = 5242880
    kernel.msgmni = 1024
    fs.file-max = 32768
    kernel.sem = 1250 256000 100 1024
    Found interface: eth0 . Alias is eth0:0
    ifconfig eth0:0 192.168.155.1 up
    Ok
    n4shost:n4sadm 35> /usr/sap/N4S/SYS/exe/run/saplicense -get
    /usr/sap/N4S/SYS/exe/run/saplicense: Exec format error. Binary file not executable.
    Can any one help me to complete the installation and execute the server successfully. I am very new to linux. Do i need to execute any other commands to complete my installation.

    Dear Rajasekhar,
    this error simply comes, because the architecture of your computer is not the same as the one from the test drive. As I'm not sure, which architecture the N4S test drive uses, we simply have one of the following situations here. Either
    your machine is x86_64 and the N4S is i386 or
    your machine is i386 and the N4S is x86_64.
    Please check!
    Thanks,
      Hannes

  • 9i and 9ias installation on SuSE linux 7.3

    Hi,
    Are there any known issues involved in installation of 9i
    and 9ias on SuSE linux 7.3 ??
    Also please let me know what are the workarounds for those
    problems and where the patches may be downloaded from ??
    I am asking this question because SuSE 7.3 is not yet
    certified by oracle.
    Thanks,

    For the database, look at
    http://www.suse.com/en/support/oracle/db/9i_73.html

  • Oracle9i Installation on SuSe Linux 7.3 Professional Edition

    Hi,
    I'm trying to Install Oracle 9i Database server on SuSe Linux 7.3 Professional Edition. I have gone throgh the Oracle 9i release notes for the Linux version. In the release notes document, in the OS Software Requirement section ( the following statement is mentioned as below ):
    "The following executables must present in the /usr/bin directory : make, ar, ld, nm"
    But after the Linux insalltion I found that only make executable is present and other doesn't. My doubt is, if I continue with the Oracle Installtion without these files does the installer cause any problems? If so how do I get these executables, as these executables doesn't exist in the "Software Installation" listing of SuSe 7.3 Professional edition?
    Another doubt is, Does SuSe 7.3 Professional edition suitable for Oracle 9i Database server? I checked the Kernal version, it seems to be OK.
    Please help.
    Thanks in advance
    Sriram Subbiah

    Hi,
    I'm trying to Install Oracle 9i Database server on SuSe Linux 7.3 Professional Edition. I have gone throgh the Oracle 9i release notes for the Linux version. In the release notes document, in the OS Software Requirement section ( the following statement is mentioned as below ):
    "The following executables must present in the /usr/bin directory : make, ar, ld, nm"Thats compiler, linker and linktool, install "binutils"!
    Sincerly,
    Christine

  • Developer 6i on suse linux 7.3 INSTALLATION gives me 'rdbms' error ? what can i do ?

    hi
    i am trying to install developer6i release 2 on suse linux 7.3 and before installation get the following error :
    rdbms' software is not available in the current
    distribution source and has not been installed.
    You must obtain and install 'rdbms' software from
    some other source first.
    Note: You may also get this error if the Installer
    registry file has been overwritten
    what can i do to fix this ???

    hi
    i am trying to install developer6i release 2 on suse linux 7.3 and before installation get the following error :
    rdbms' software is not available in the current
    distribution source and has not been installed.
    You must obtain and install 'rdbms' software from
    some other source first.
    Note: You may also get this error if the Installer
    registry file has been overwritten
    what can i do to fix this ???

  • Lenovo G560 and Office 2013 installation problems.

    I recently acquired a copy of Office 2013 and I upgraded my office 2010 to 2013. However, I get a response that some office packages could not open because set up could not find or validate an installition file. Please try reinstalling office from the installation source, or if you installed from a downloaded package, please redownload and reinstall. I have tried severally to reinstall but still facing the same problem. The only Office 15 package that work is Powerpoint. Im running Office on a Lenovo G560 core i3 processer, 3GB RAM and 320 HDD. The Office 15 package is OFFICE 2013 VL. Please help. I am desperate. Please help.

    hi  onyanchaerick,
    If the above procedure doesn't work, you can also try to:
    1. Fully remove MS Office 2010 by following this or this guide.
    2. If you have an Office Professional Plus 2013, download a trial version here, then activate it with your full version product key.
    Goodluck!
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"! This will help the rest of the Community with similar issues identify the verified solution and benefit from it.
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!

  • Installation ColdFusion MX 7.02 on SUSE Linux 10

    I tried to install ColdFusion MX 7.02 on SUSE Linux 10 with
    Apache 2 web server and I have this very unusual error. ..
    ./coldfusion-702-lin.bin
    Preparing to install...
    Extracting the JRE from the installer archive...
    Unpacking the JRE...
    Extracting the installation resources from the installer
    archive...
    Configuring the installer for this system's environment...
    awk: error while loading shared libraries: libdl.so.2: cannot
    open shared object file: No
    such file or directory
    dirname: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6:
    cannot open shared object file:
    No such file or directory
    /bin/ls: error while loading shared libraries: librt.so.1:
    cannot open shared object file
    : No such file or directory
    basename: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6:
    cannot open shared object file
    : No such file or directory
    dirname: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6:
    cannot open shared object file:
    No such file or directory
    basename: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6:
    cannot open shared object file
    : No such file or directory
    Launching installer...
    grep: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot
    open shared object file: No
    such file or directory
    /tmp/install.dir.25814/Linux/resource/jre/bin/java: error
    while loading shared libraries:
    libpthread.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such
    file or directory
    Any ideas why it might be are really appreciated.

    Take a look at
    this
    thread on Steve Erat's blog.

  • Installation: Oracle 10g on SUSE Linux 10.1

    Can this be? I sat for hours preparing my all new clean SUSE Linux 10.1 server for the installation of Oracle 10g (Standard Edition)... and when running the installer it simply tells me that SUSE 9 is needed...
    I've found others here in the forum having experienced the same.
    Maybe I just downloaded the wrong version of Oracle?
    The main download page is at:
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/index.html
    I selected entry "Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Linux x86" (the one directly below the Windows version):
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/htdocs/10201linuxsoft.html
    The size of the file^^ is 668,734,007 bytes.
    Or should i have downloaded entry "Oracle Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.2) for z/Linux":
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/oracle10g/htdocs/10202zlinuxsoft.html
    The size of the file^^ is 838,518,746 bytes.
    By the way, all these versions on the main page should have some kind of description, something like "This is the Linux Version for most standard 32Bit single and multiprocessor Intel compatible servers."
    Well, since I'm completely stuck now with SUSE 10.1, is there any way to make the Oracle installer go on that SUSE version? Maybe SUSE can pretend to be version 9... but how do I achieve something freaky as this?
    Thanks for any help, comments, suggestions...
    Karsten

    BTW, I think it's bad practice by Oracle not supporting SUSE 10.1.Actually, I think it is good practise for Oracle not to certify the public beta versions of an operating system.
    Please remember that Fedora and SuSE Linux are cycled every 6-8 months, making then truly unstable for commercial purposes. IN addition, they are often desupported by the comminuty within 2-3 years, forcing upgrades. And finally, Both Red Hat and SuSE/Novell publically state that these are 'proving grounds for new features' (meaning they are beta).
    Certification means that Oracle will invest heavily and train people on the specific operating system and work with the operating system supplier, 24x7 if needed, to make sure that customers will continue in production. I am not aware that the SuSE Linux or Fedora supporters are willing to put in 24x7 support they way the Red Hat and SuSE Enterprise groups are.
    This does not imply the public OSs are bad. It just means that Oracle (and I) believe they are unsuited for commercial, business mission critical, immediate support required, environments.
    By the way, I have the combination of Oracle10g and SuSE Linux 10.1 working, and it works well. However, I did need to make sure that the libraries to which Oracle10g was compiled are available in the OS.
    Or maybe Sybase does better.... ;-pNot if the [glibc] libraries are incompatible. Nor does PostgreSQL nor MySQL.

Maybe you are looking for