Redirect undeliverable mail to avoid backscatter?

Hi,
I'm migrating from an old Sun server "appliance" and there was a way to redirect any undeliverable messages.
We got tons of spam coming to addresses like [email protected] when there was no Fred at our company. So the messages would bounce to the fake "from" addresses and then we got flagged for spamming and blacklisted for backscatter.
So I found that I could just redirect all the meassges to an unused address and I would just dump the mail file periodically. No spam bouncing back out.
The mail settings in ML server are so minimal, I can figure out if there's a way to do this. Is the spam filtering supposed to handle this?
I'm just worried that our old problem will come back when I replace the old server with this new ML server mini.
Thanks,
Scott

I actually have a Snow leopard server where I thought this was not an issue so I tried a test on that sending a test to [email protected] and I got this back:
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients was aborted after 1 second(s):
* [email protected]
Is this a bounce or reject? Because it came back to me it seems like a bounce since if it had been sent by a spammer with my from address, it came to me like backscatter.
One thing I notice though is that it was from my ISP, not the server I sent it to:
Mail Delivery System <[email protected]>

Similar Messages

Undeliverable Mail in Postfix

I would like to redirect all undeliverable messages to another host for delivery. There are options to redirect undeliverable mail to an email address but this is not what I want. I need it to go to another mail host.
Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks.

hmmmm
I may have an answer for you, but am not totally sure of your problem.
At home, I have several e-mail addresses.. some for AOL, one for work and a few for my ISP at home, and each e-mail account has been set to use a separate outgoing mail server.
So I send an e-mail to someone from home from my work e-mail address(which is set to use my work outgoing mail server), and for some reason, it is not deliverable... Mail gives me a pop up asking if I'd like to send via another method.
So I select to send via my home ISP. This simply changes the outgoing mail server for that single message. The mail is received by the reciepent, as if it were sent from my work e-mail address, even though it went out thru my home ISP mail server.
Now perhaps you are aware of this and wish to have Mail automatically take care of this for you..but I am unaware of a way to make this happen. What you CAN do is this: If you have an outgoing mail server that doesn't "play nice" all the time, and you have a mail server that DOES, simply change the outgoing mail server on the account that is giving you problems to the "nice" mail server.
Ugh.. this sounds twisetd and mixed up.. let me know if this helps whatsoever.

Undeliverable Mail for Postfix

I would like to redirect all undeliverable messages to another host for delivery. There are options to redirect undeliverable mail to an email address but this is not what I want. I need it to go to another mail host.
Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks.

Are you trying to work around the issue of ISPs like AOL and Roadrunner blocking any mail from your postfix smtp server because your computer, that is running postfix, lives in dynamic IP space?

'Undeliverable Mail Return To Sender' spam?

As of late, we have been getting 'undeliverable mail' which appears to be spam. The long headers appear to indicate that it is indeed coming from our mail server and the body of the message goes something like this:
This is the Postfix program at host nopali.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to <postmaster>
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The Postfix program
<[email protected]>: host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.1 Message
content rejected, UBE, id=21361-04 (in reply to end of DATA command)
Reporting-MTA: dns; nopali.com
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 7260D27DAB9
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; [email protected]
Arrival-Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:10:46 -0500 (EST)
Final-Recipient: rfc822; [email protected]
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.1 Message
content rejected, UBE, id=21361-04 (in reply to end of DATA command)
From: "Ronald Myers" <[email protected]>
Date: December 23, 2006 4:11:11 AM EST (CA)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Because that is curious girdle, and Hormah, and some therefore,
...and there is generally a spamish content underneath.
Has anyone encountered this?
I thought perhaps that somehow others were able to use my mail cue, but I closed the firewall for SMTP mail to only favourable IPs. However, when I look at my mail cue, I see a bunch of things waiting to be sent out. They appear to be a bunch of spam that the server trying to return. The cue would typically have this message:
Message ID: 266692764C8
Date: Thu Dec 21 13:31:52
Size: 6742
Sender: MAILER-DAEMON
Recipient(s) & Status:
[email protected]:
connect to wc.wachovia.com[169.200.182.108]: Operation timed out
It appears that the server is trying to return spammed mail to sender and it is timing out. I am not sure, though. This would not make sense since I have spam being redirected to a separate spam_depot account.
Any ideas on how to figure this one out?

I can't tell you if this is a wise decision for your setup, you need to make that call.
You are getting into settings which stray far from the GUI and the support of Apple, venture forward carefully..
The comments within the amavisd.conf file and threads in this forum contain most/all of what you may require. Spend time reviewing the config file. all of it's options, the flow of amavis (well documented) and how amavis links to postfix...... then out of thousands of possible configurations you can make the decision of what is best for your server.
Some hints... (which were documented in an earlier thread)
The GUI sets tag2 and sakill_leveldflt the same:
$sakill_leveldeflt = $satag2_leveldeflt;
You can change this so that one set of actions is performed at tag2 and a more extreme action at the kill level. something like this works well for a well trained server:
$satag2_leveldeflt = 3.0
$sakill_leveldeflt = 6.0;
When the kill level is reached, the finalspamdestiny action is performed. If you bounce or reject, you will generate bounces in your queue. If you discard, the no bounce is generated. Even if you discard, you still have a quarantine.
The default is to quarantine the spam as files in /var/virusmails Many people never look in this folder, and it can easily fill-up. Look in your settings for something like this:
$QUARANTINEDIR = '/var/virusmails';
you can comment this to:
#$QUARANTINEDIR = '/var/virusmails';
to disable the quarantining to a directory.
You can quarantine to an email address, read the file, it's pretty clear.
Take the time to read through the file. Make changes one at a time and allow plenty of testing between changes. Make any files you change. Be sure to stop/start mail service to activate changes.
Jeff

Copy Undeliverable Mail To / luser_relay no worky?

Hi everyone,
I know it's a despised feature, but I just need it working until I'm confident everything has been migrated well. I'm of course referring to "Copy Undeliverable Mail To:". When I first turned it on, and tested in, mail was still bouncing:
Jun 7 14:07:23 server postfix/pipe[2354]: DDD381CA53F: to=<[email protected]>, relay=dovecot, delay=2180, delays=2180/0/0/0.01, dsn=4.1.1, status=SOFTBOUNCE (user unknown)
I assumed that Server Admin was just enabling luser_relay in /etc/postfix/main.cf, but it was not, Rather, it was changing /etc/MailServicesOther.plist:
<key>lmtpluserrelay</key>
<string>catchalluser</string>
<key>lmtpluser_relayenabled</key>
<true/>
I disabled it there and tried manually setting luser_relay in /etc/postfix/main.cf.
Neither solution seemed to work. Anyone successfully have this working?

OK. I can see your problem.
Well, at least users are forced to fix the faulty address immediately. By getting a bounce later most users won't
I know this is not the answer you were looking for so here you go (although I actually think user education never hurts and have not implemented this on my high traffic servers ;-):
Are your users being forced to use SMTP authentication to send? If not make sure you have this in place as the first step. This is important so that your security is not compromised.
Now look at your /etc/postfix/main.cf and towards the end look for
smtpdrecipientrestrictions = .......
You'll see something along these lines:
smtpdrecipientrestrictions = permitsaslauthenticated, rejectunauthdestination, permit_mynetworks, rejectrblclient sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, rejectrblclient relays.ordb.org, permit
See if it includes rejectunauthdestination and/or rejectunverifiedrecipient and remove those.
This should do the trick (not knowing your configuration there is always a chance something doesn't work as expected).
The drawback is that this is now true for all senders and thus mail will get accepted first and bounced later if for unknown users.
You can "finetune" this so that it applies only to your local users, but this requires quite a bit of fiddling around with your configuration and will "break" Server Admin. If you don't mind, see the following page for more info or ask again
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Alex

Suggest a feature page results in undeliverable mail

I've been trying to submit a feature request, but all I get is an email response that my submission could not be delivered. Since bug reporting doesn't seem to include bugs in their website/mail delivery, I figured posting here might get some response.
Delivery has failed to these recipients or distribution lists:
[email protected]
Your message wasn't delivered because of security policies. Microsoft Exchange will not try to redeliver this message for you. Please provide the following diagnostic text to your system administrator.
Sent by Microsoft Exchange Server 2007
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: corp.adobe.com
[email protected]
#550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized ##rfc822;[email protected]
The Actual feature request was…
*******Enhancement / FMR*********
Brief title for your desired feature: Table Sort
How would you like the feature to work?
Have a sort icon show in table headers and be able to choose multiple columns to sort the table by.
Why is this feature important to you?
Apartment directories often have the same info twice, once sorted by Apartment Number then Last Name then First Name, and a second table is used sorted by Last Name then First Name then Apartment Number.
Having to create two import files with the sort criteria and import each as a table then format each table is inefficient. Better to import single table, format, then make as many duplicates as necessary and change sorting within InDesign.

I'm afraid sending me to the same page that I am reporting as having a problem is no solution. My fault since I didn't specify Adobe - Feature Request/Bug Report Form as where I was getting the results I mentioned, but the title of my post should have made it easy to make that connection
(Suggest a feature page results in undeliverable mail)
Yes, I used the real form on the real web page and got nothing useful for my effort… and that hasn't changed yet.

Undeliverable mail question

hi,
What does this dsn mean? And could it be spam?
the subject is "Undeliverable mail"
Message body:
Failed to deliver to '[email protected]'
SMTP module(domain yyyyy.com) reports:
yyyyy.com: no response
Two attachments came along with the message. One of them is:
Reporting-MTA: dns; mail.zzzzz.net
Original-Recipient: rfc822;<[email protected]>
Final-Recipient: rfc822;<[email protected]>
Action: failed
Status: 4.0.0
I checked mail.log_current and grepped for zzzzz.net:
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 21:16:12.76 tcp_local ims-ms E 5 rfc822;[email protected] myuser@ims-ms-daemon zzzzz.net (mail.zzzzz.net [a.b.c.d])
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 21:19:56.49 tcp_local ims-ms E 3 rfc822;[email protected] myuser@ims-ms-daemon zzzzz.net (mail.zzzzz.net [a.b.c.d])
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 21:38:36.74 tcp_local ims-ms E 3 rfc822;[email protected] myuser@ims-ms-daemon zzzzz.net (mail.zzzzz.net [a.b.c.d])
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 21:55:07.28 tcp_local ims-ms E 3 rfc822;[email protected] myuser@ims-ms-daemon zzzzz.net (mail.zzzzz.net [a.b.c.d])
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 22:42:36.60 tcp_local ims-ms E 3 rfc822;[email protected] myuser@ims-ms-daemon zzzzz.net (mail.zzzzz.net [a.b.c.d])
thx

thx for the explanation .Now things are clearer. Few
more questions if you don't mind Jay:
what about the E entries in the log:
mail.log_yesterday:07-Mar-2006 21:16:12.76 tcp_local
ims-ms E 5 rfc822;[email protected]
myuser@ims-ms-daemon swip.net (mailfe05.swip.net
[83.180.141.95]) "E" means, "Enqueue". That's when your server puts the message in the queue. Has nothing to do with sending a message. In fact, this log entry shows the message
Coming from the tcp_local channel (external to your systems),
and addressed to your user on the local store.
>
Does it mean that the my mail server was trying to
re-send the spam again?No
Also, when you said 'original address is bad', the
original address is [email protected]? and the
remote server checked that email address and found
out that it does not exist?No.
the address to: was "[email protected]", or whatever was there, before you changed it.
>
Finally, what about the aol and yahoo emails that I
found in the FROM and TO in the attached file?
Received: from d83-180-141-95.cust.tele2.es
([83.180.141.95] verified)
by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8)
with SMTP id 39743822; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 22:57:17
17 +0100
Message-ID: <000b01c63e01$377fa740$5f8db453@ppdtdv>
From:
=?Windows-1251?Q?=D2=E8=EC=EE=F4=E5=E9_=D2=E0=F0=E0=F1
=EE=E2=E8=F7_=CA=EE=ED=E4=E5=E5=E2?=
<[email protected]>
To:
=?Windows-1251?Q?=C1=EE=E3=E4=E0=ED_=C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=FC
=E5=E2=E8=F7_=CC=F3=F5=E0=EC=E5=E4=E8=ED=EE=E2?=
<[email protected]>
Those have nothing to do with the current mail itself. They're attached/forwarded/replied previously.

'Undeliverable Mail' SPAM

I have recently started to get a fair amount of 'Undeliverable Mail' SPAM.
Anyone else getting this?
imac G5 20; 1gig RAM; 160HD; airport; bluetooth keyboard & mouse; bose companion 3 speakers Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I've received the same before as have many others which is an indication a spammer has used your email address to appear as the sending email address for a bulk spam mailing.
Spammers do not provide a valid sending or return email address which is constantly changed and some spammers use a valid email address pulled from their list of "known good" email addresses.
This is likely what has occurred and if so, there isn't much if anything you can do about it.

Undeliverable mail - error message

When I try to send mail, I get an Undeliverable mail error message/response. I don't know if it makes a difference if I select the me.com or mac.com as my outgoing server. I also work at a university, but I don't think that should be a problem since this just surfaced today. I've posted some additional technical details below. Has anyone else experienced this problem recently?
Error message details:
SMTP module(domain mac.com) reports:
host smtp-mx2.mac.com says:
550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias
Reporting-MTA: dns; regor.[myuniversity].edu

First of all test the other mail host. Do nslookup on the mx record for the domain. Maybe also check it from somewhere else on the internet to make sure your dns server doesnt still have an old entry cached. Once you know dns is going to the right server, try to telnet to port 25 on that server to see if you can connect to the other mail server and get a header back. If you want you could go a step further and send a message via command line but not usually necessary.
If that server seems fine, look at your own mail server. Check dns, delivery to other addresses etc..

Can't copy Undeliverable Mail

I am running Mail on a Mac OS 10.4.2 xServer and find that the GUI setting "Copy undeliverable messages to" does not work as explained in the manual. When I check this option and enter the postmaster account, it does not copy but forwards all undeliverable messages to the postmaster's account. When I check the file /etc/postfix/mail.cf the line is added luser_relay = postmaster.
On page 70 of Apples Mail Service Administration Manual, it indicates that the /etc/postfix/mail.cf file needs to be modified to add luser_relay = postmaster "To set up forwarding of undeliverable incoming mail;" not copy.
The problem is if I forward undeliverable mail to the postmaster, the user does not get a message like they did on a 10.2 server indicating the message was not delivered.
Does anyone know how I can get the message to bounce back to the original sender and have a copy go to the postmaster at the same time?

OK. I can see your problem.
Well, at least users are forced to fix the faulty address immediately. By getting a bounce later most users won't
I know this is not the answer you were looking for so here you go (although I actually think user education never hurts and have not implemented this on my high traffic servers ;-):
Are your users being forced to use SMTP authentication to send? If not make sure you have this in place as the first step. This is important so that your security is not compromised.
Now look at your /etc/postfix/main.cf and towards the end look for
smtpdrecipientrestrictions = .......
You'll see something along these lines:
smtpdrecipientrestrictions = permitsaslauthenticated, rejectunauthdestination, permit_mynetworks, rejectrblclient sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org, rejectrblclient relays.ordb.org, permit
See if it includes rejectunauthdestination and/or rejectunverifiedrecipient and remove those.
This should do the trick (not knowing your configuration there is always a chance something doesn't work as expected).
The drawback is that this is now true for all senders and thus mail will get accepted first and bounced later if for unknown users.
You can "finetune" this so that it applies only to your local users, but this requires quite a bit of fiddling around with your configuration and will "break" Server Admin. If you don't mind, see the following page for more info or ask again
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html
Alex

Cannot redirect voice mails: Unable to relay

Hi,
we recently subscribed to office365. Some of our users prefer to redirect their mails to their own email address via a simple redirect rule that applies to all messages. For the most part, it works fine, except that all voicemails are not being
redirected and they bounce back with a '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay' error.
Any advice?
The following is a sample of the exact error message, except, email addresses, dns names, and IP's are fictional:
mail.domain.com rejected your message to the following email addresses:
[email protected]
mail.domain.com gave this error:
Unable to relay
Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept email from certain senders, or another restriction may be
preventing delivery.
Diagnostic information for administrators:
Generating server: CO1PR05MB298.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
[email protected]
mail.domain.com
Remote Server returned '550 5.7.1 Unable to relay'
Original message headers:
Received: from CO1PR05MB330.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.69.15) by CO1PR05MB298.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.70.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.9;
Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:21:09 +0000 Received: from CO1PR05MB329.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.69.25) by CO1PR05MB330.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.69.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.913.9; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:21:02 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB329.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([127.0.0.1]) by CO1PR05MB329.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.15.35]) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.00.0898.005; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:20:56 +0000 From: 5555555555 To: John Doe
<[email protected]> Subject: Voice Mail (1 second) Thread-Topic: Voice Mail (1 second) Thread-Index: AQHPUzXA/cqBNK6DZkO6hLItkicVSw== Sender: Microsoft Outlook <[email protected]icrosoft.com>
Content-Class: voice X-CallingTelephoneNumber: 5555555555 X-VoiceMessageDuration: 1 X-VoiceMessageSenderName: X-AttachmentOrder: 5555555555 (1 second) Voice Mail.mp3 X-CallID:
[email protected] Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 14:20:39 +0000 Message-ID: <[email protected]ok.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-MS-Exchange-Inbox-Rules-Loop: [email protected] X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:SKI;SFS:;DIR:INB;SFP:;SCL:-1;SRVR:CO1PR05MB329;H:CO1PR05MB329.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;LANG:;SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019001)(428001)(189002)(199002)(558084003)(56776001)(47446002)(69226001)(46552001)(76176001)(76576001)(2171001)(97186001)(89836001)(95666003)(59766001)(81542001)(85306002)(83322001)(74662001)(97336001)(56816005)(76796001)(99396002)(31966008)(74876001)(54356001)(54316002)(98676001)(87266001)(95416001)(81342001)(2656002)(90146001)(76786001)(83072002)(47736001)(49866001)(85852003)(74316001)(4396001)(75432001)(47976001)(50986001)(94316002)(93136001)(33646001)(65816001)(81816001)(80976001)(20776003)(93516002)(79102001)(74706001)(87936001)(46102001)(63696002)(74366001)(16236675002)(92566001)(81686001)(53806001)(94946001)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:CO1PR05MB330;H:CO1PR05MB329.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:5C05F2A6.11BB5411.1D618B26.DE60A428.2009E;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;A:1;LANG:;
Resent-From: <[email protected]> x-ms-exchange-parent-message-id: <[email protected]utlook.com> auto-submitted:
auto-generated x-ms-exchange-generated-message-source: Mailbox Rules Agent x-forefront-prvs: 017589626D received-spf: None (: domain.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="_004_9bc7a70bd0e846d0a76f63bdcd4371d2CO1PR05MB329namprd05pro_" MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path:
[email protected] X-OriginatorOrg: companyname.onmicrosoft.com

Hi,
Since you are able to send emails to internal domain i assume the application server IP address already allowed into Receive Connector.
To relay application emails to external domain you should enable Externally Secured box in the Authentication Tab of the particular Receive Connector.
Kottees :My Blog Please mark it as an answer if it really helps you.

How do I configure Server 3.0 to deliver "undeliverable" mail to a specific "catchall email address?

How do I configure Server 3.0 to deliver "undeliverable" mail to a specific "catchall email address?
I had this working in Server 2.0 dunno why it doesn't now, but I can't find the config.

It's fairly straight forward and there is a GUI option to help you.
In the Server app, go to Users. Select the User you want to create email aliases for. Right click, or hold down Shift-Ctrl and click on the name. Select 'Advanced Options...' from the menu. You can then enter as many aliases as you want in the 'Aliases'.
For example: [email protected], @xyz.co.uk, [email protected]
My example is overkill as I only really needed to add '@xyz.co.uk' as a catch all get everything sent to that domain delivered to that users email address.

Cannot Redirect Incoming mail Using a Rule

I can no longer redirect mail using a rule (it worked the first few times, but no longer.) I have tried setting up a new user account, the mail will still not redirect using a rule.
Has anyone found a solution to this problem?
Macpro 2.0mhz Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Michael,
If there is specific information you are after, then
it would be helpful to request that information
instead of just being short and snide.
You're assuming too much here. I don't know what the problem really is, not even whether there is a solution. To express in your own terms a different way to look at the situation, if there is a specific solution anyone here is after, then it would be helpful to provide all the relevant information instead of assuming that people willing to help is going to be able to guess what the problem really is...
And I don't need you to give me permission to believe what I want.
I haven't. Actually, what I've done is precisely acknowledging that.
His post was basically saying "Is anyone else out there having
trouble redirecting mail with a rule? If so... is there a solution?"
In other words, since I don't have that problem, and I don't even know what the problem really is, I should rather not have asked, right?
If I had other rules doing things with the messages that MIGHT
interefere with the process, I would have mentioned that.
Glad to know. Problem is, I'm confused now. What you said above made me believe that I should ask any specific questions I might have. Now, you seem to be saying that if no additional information was provided, that means I should assume that there is nothing else that could be relevant to the problem, and hence I shouldn't ask obviously redundant and unnecessary questions. Could you please clarify this?
Also, how was I supposed to know that this was the case? Should I assume that for every user that posts about a problem or only for you? If the latter, did I miss something that should have made me realize that was the case for you?
I'm not sure how to proceed now. I can honestly tell you that I still don't know what the problem is, nor whether it can be fixed. There is something about the fact that you're using a Gmail account that makes me wonder, but you've clearly stated below that I should go somewhere else if the information already provided isn't enough, so it seems the right thing to do here is to avoid wasting your time with stupid questions.
If this is not enough information for you...
then help someone else with their problem.
That's what I do, each and every day...
But just because you assume user error, doesn't mean
someone else hasn't found a solution to the problem that
3 of us have explained.
I'm not assuming anything. That's what I'm trying to tell you, that I don't really know what's going on. I'm just trying to understand the problem in case I or someone else that, as a result of the discussion, finds a better description of what the problem really is, can help. If you feel that's not appropriate and I should have tried to help only if I already knew what the problem is and how to fix it, I apologize for having wasted your time.
Oh! And I'm not sure the problem is the same in all the cases being discussed here either.
Regards.

Receiver Mail Adapter - Avoid attachment

Hello
Could anyone please let me know, how to prevent a mail attachment with a Receiver Mail Adapter. I have chosen XIPAYLOAD as Message Protocol. When the mail is received there is no mail body, instead only the attachment contains the message.
Thanks
John Jeyaraj

Hi,
Use Mail XSD as target structure in your mapping and enable use Mail package in your receiver channel...
for avoiding attachments..
HTH
Rajesh

Undeliverable mail by MS Exchange server

I'm the dark horse trying to use Mail on an Exchange server at work. I spent yesterday getting the connection together, and it's all working fine except for this one thing.
Everything I send bounces back to me as undeliverable with the following message:
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
Subject: Re:test
Sent: 6/26/2007 9:34 AM
The following recipient(s) could not be reached:
  Legitimate internal email addy on 6/26/2007 9:34 AM
  The e-mail account does not exist at the organization this message was sent to. Check the e-mail address, or contact the recipient directly to find out the correct address.
  server01.DOMAIN.local
I rarely see this notification in Mail--it shows up in my Outlook Web Access inbox. The messages I'm sending (the ones that are supposedly undeliverable) do reach their addressees, but they go straight into the user's Exchange server's automatically created "SpamEmail" folder.
I feel like something of a hero having navigated the pitfalls involved in setting this up so far, so I don't want to give up. Also, my option is to use Entourage, which was drastically slowing my quad core Mac Pro every time it checked to "Now update" somesuch thing or another--which was always, no matter how I had the "schedules" scheduled. I don't want to go back. (And webmail is o.k. for remote access, but not for daily office work.)
Thanks
Core Duo iMac 24", G4 PB, Mac Pro Mac OS X (10.4.10) Airport Extreme network with a Cranky Ethernet drive
Core Duo iMac 24", G4 PB, Quad Core Mac Pro Mac OS X (10.4.10) Airport Extreme network with a Cranky Ethernet drive

Without seeing the full header of one of those messages, its nearly impossible to say what's wrong and even with the full header, its not an easy issue to diagnose without more info. Your best option is to report this problem to your Exchange server's administrator and ask him or her to look at the Exchange server's log files for any issues.

Redirect undeliverable mail to avoid backscatter?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for