Reduce space/distance between tables

Hi experts!
I just need to know how to reduce the distance between some tables.
I have 10 tables of 1 row each, and I would like to show these 10 tables as one reducing the space until they are all together.
The solution of combining with similar request it is not a solution for me.
I guess there is a file where I can change the properties of the sections where I can fill the propertie of the distance with 0.
I need to have this reduced distance just for this case, not for all the dashboards, columns and sections.

Use the validation tool below.
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.betteannesteele.com%2F
You've got a closing paragraph tag on line 81 where none is needed.
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

Reducing space/lines between tables?

Using 5.2 (1860), I have several tables on a document and more lines of spacing between each than I'd like. I place the cursor between each table and hit delete, though that does not do it. How do I do this?
Thanks.

Hi southwestform;
Select the table and make some manipulation in its Text Wrap under Move with Text tab.
By default, Text Wrap is Inline With Text.
Change it to other than Inline With Text, i.e., Above and Below and so on.
Now try to add line spaces as needed.
Regards,

What is difference between table space and shchema

what is difference between table space and shchema ?

784633 wrote:
so each user has it own space of tables - schema ?yes, but let's clarify a bit ....
The "schema" is the collection of all objects owned by a particular user. So if user SCOTT creates two tables, EMP and DEPT, and a view EMP_RPT, and a procedure GET_MY_EMP, those objects (tables, views, procedures) collectively make up the SCOTT schema.
Those objects will be physically stored in a tablespace.
A tablespace is a named collection of data files. So tablespace USERS will be made up of one or more data files. A specific datafile can belong to one and only one tablespace. If a tablespace has more than one data file, oracle will manage those files as a collection invisible to the application - much like the OS or disk subsystem handles striping across multiple physical disks.
A specific object in the SCOTT schema can exist in only one tablespace, but not all objects of the schema have to be in the same tablespace. Likewise a tablespace can contain objects from multiple schemas.
and can one user to access tables of other users?As others have said - FRED can access tables belonging to SCOTT as long has SCOTT has granted that access to FRED.

Space between tables in dreamweaver

Cellpad = 0, Cellspace = 0 and Border = 0 but there is still a space between tables. I checked in explorer and chrome, same thing. Suggestions?

This is not a DW or even a table problem - it's a 'you' problem! ;-)
What you are seeing is the space that is reserved below inline elements to accommodate text descenders. Make that image have the CSS style of "display:block" and you will see the gap vanish.

Reduce space between columns

hi all...
i want to reduce space between columns in sqlplus....
how can i?

sachinpawan wrote:
hi all...
i want to reduce space between columns in sqlplus....
how can i?Which space? Where it is coming, in some output? Whats the db version?
Aman....

Huge spaces between tables

I cannot seem to eliminate the huge space between tables. I have set the td to vertical align top but it seems to make no difference. Example: http://blandheritage.org/GENEALOGY/numberingsystem.html

There are no tables on that page. Everything is either an absolutely positioned div, or a paragraph contained within an absolutely positioned div. The huge space is caused by your (INLINE) positioning of the apDiv12 -
<div id="apDiv12" style="position: absolute; left: 10px; top: 1016px; width: 994px; height: 1452px; z-index: 10">
I count 90 such absolutely positioned elements on your page, which could be the poster child for why one shouldn't use absolute positioning as a primary layout method (http://www.apptools.com/examples/pagelayout101.php). Just use your browser text size controls to increase the browser's display of text a couple of ticks and see what happens to your layout (in Safari I just use Command-+). Two ticks, and the contents have overlapped so much that the page becomes unreadable. I recognize it my be too late to inform you of this fundamental mistake in your approach on this page, but if I were you, I'd fix it. Who would ramp up the text size like this? Anyone with vision problems who may have their browsers already set at a large text display for readability - you have no control over that....
The good news is that this is the only page I see on your site that is built this way - all other pages are table-based, and while that approach is also uber-retro, at least it doesn't suffer from this potential overlapping problem.

Reports 6i: Unable to reduce the spacing between records

Hello all,
We have a report that displays tons of records in several layers of grouping. I need to reduce the (padding) space between the fields and the edge of the repeating frame they are in (in the layout model) so the total number of pages are reduced in the output report. I have the confine mode on (lock icon closed) so as to keep things in proper grouping (like a field cannot come out of its enclosing frame). The problem I have is, when moving fields near to the edge of the enclosing frame, the report would not let me move it to the edge of the enclosing frame. It would keep a (padding) distance between the field and the edge and would not move any closer. Strangely, in some of the other rdfs we have, I could move the enclosed field to completely near the edge of enclosing frame while in confine mode. I noticed no difference in the properties between the two rdfs. I also tried Tools-->Preferences-->Wizards Horizontal/Vertical Gap properties but to no avail. Please note that this problem exists for both repeating and non-repeating frames.
Thanks in advance,
Srinivas

Please try View->Snap to Grid,Unselected this property.Then test if this problem is resolved.

Diversity - Distance between Antennas

Considering both antennas are similar-type and gain the two imp criterias i read in achiveing Diversity is
1. Antennas should be placed close enough to each other so that the RF coverage area is nearly identical.
2. The receiving antennas are spaced sufficiently apart to achieve independence (no coupling) between the received signals.
So the distance between both the antenna would be important.
In a cisco doc,
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_tech_note09186a008019f646.shtml
For 2.4GHz wavelength = 12.5cm and for 5GHz wavelength = 6cm.
Hence for 2.4GHz wavelength,
Dist bet diversity Ant = 12.5cms Or 25cms or 37.5cms or 50cms
now from below POST:
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=WLAN%20Radio%20Standards&topicID=.ee6e8c2&fromOutline=&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc18267
The spacing can be in multiples but is best in multiples of odd numbers. 1x or 3x. This allows for the phase to be always 100% out for the opposing antennae. 2x could cause phase shift overlay and could result in both antennae receiving the same phase shift differentiation.
Is this true? then my choise would narrow down to "Dist bet diversity Ant=12.5cms or 37.5cms'
But from below POST iam confused regarding point 1 and 2 (I have put them pointwise just for reference)
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=WLAN%20Radio%20Standards&topicID=.ee6e8c2&fromOutline=&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.2cc0332d
1. Never should you have the antennas exactly one wavelength away from each other. For the frequency of 2400, one wavelength is 4.92"... so any distance that is not a multiple of 4.92 and no more than a multiple of 4 is recommended.
2. You should use 1/2 wavelength distances and to be safe no more than multiple of 3.
My Questions are
1. Should the distance between my Antennas for diversity be any len more than 12.5 cms and less than 25cms or more than 37.5cms and less than 50cms?
2. Is it that the distance between my Antennas for diversity should not be exactly equal to the multiple of wavelengths? (12.5cms, 25cms, 37.5cms, 50cms)
3. Is it that i have to use only odd wavelengths multiples? (12.5cms, 37.5cms) and should not use even multiples?
4. The use 1/2 wavelength distances between the antennas is diversity. Is it ok? or is the minimum 1 wavelength as specfied in the cisco doc.
Also from the below POST iam confused regarding the MAX distance:
http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Wireless%20-%20Mobility&topic=WLAN%20Radio%20Standards&topicID=.ee6e8c2&fromOutline=&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.1dd7905b
"Distance beyond 1-2 wavelengths is not critical. Since the antennas are not transmitting and/or receiving at the same time,there is no real chance of overloading the other antenna or radio front-end. "
There's not really a "max distance" as far as diversity is concerned. By placing the antennas some distance apart (the minimum, I believe, is ~one wavelength), you optimize the chance that a signal that is null (or interfered with) on one side, isn't on the other.
my question is
5. Is there a max distance between the antennas in diversity (like we read 4xwavelength) or there is no max distance? then wont there evolve a different RF coverage area for both the Antennas?
Another important question
> If my wireless card supports 5GHZ and 2.4GHZ and hence my antennas would be dual band. Then to achive antenna Diversity, what would be the distance between the two antennas? The minimum distance should be 1 wavelength, so For 2.4GHz wavelength = 12.5cm and for 5GHz wavelength = 6cm.
For a dual band antenna? how much should it be? Whats the min and max.
someone please can help me solve the huge confusion in my mind :)

First, let me say that this is certainly a well-done post, good job of back-tracking the links and expressing your questions.
The next thing is that there are more than a few nuances when dealing with RF and signal transmission and propagation, so to cover a specific topic fully would frequently cover more space than provided.
With all that dancing out of the way ;-), I'll take a shot at answering your questions...
"Is there a max distance ... ?"
Well, no, not really ... but there is a max *effective* distance and a fairly specific point of diminishing returns (as mentioned in the linked posts).
The design and implementation goal is to create a sort of "binocular view" with the antennas, such that the chance of a "null" is reduced, such that the signal / pattern developed from the diverse pair of antennas will create at least one clean and clear (reduced multipath, reduced nulls, possibly better line of sight)signal to (ideally) every client in the coverage area.
Even though only one antenna is active at any given time, having any conductor within the radiated field will distort the transmission envelope, either positively (in the case of a Yagi) or negatively (in the case of a grounded conductor, like a sprinkler head).
The amount of the distortion, and the shape of the distortion are functions of the size and shape of the parasitic element. The effect is so variable that it is one of the foundations for the contention that a comprehensive site survey is not really an option, it's mandatory; it's truely the only way to see what adaptations are necessary to make the "rules of thumb" function in the specific location.
Regarding antennas handling multiple bands:
The antennas (in this case) are close to resonant multiples. The differences are such that the logical / electrical length can be adjusted by adding inductive or capacitive loads at the transmitter or feed point.
Even though the physical shape of the antennas may be different from model to model, the electrical load characteristics for a given band / antenna remain similar, so electronically compensating to make an antenna primarily designed for 2.4GHz function well for 5.6GHz is not especially difficult. Going from the longer wavelength to the shorter is more effective and easier to design than trying to go the other way.
For example, a quarter-wave 2.4GHz antenna is easily compensated to create a good half wave (or loaded 5/8) 5.6GHz antenna.
So, (finally) to provide the proper spacing for a diverse pair of multi-band antennas, figure for the longer wavelength (2.4GHz in this case) and the (roughly double) distance is likely to be acceptable for the higher wavelength. The spacing doesn't have to be exact; personally, I used to shoot for ~18" (variable with the mounting location and antenna type)and I always had pretty good luck, according to the follow-up survey.
Because of the jillions of possible variables, you can't just calculate and hang the antennas and be done ... a survey should be done to verify the installations and to make educated adjustments that will optimize the system for that specific location and environment.
The initial calculations are ideal guidelines, then you make adjustments to cover things like metal wall studs, sprinkler heads, the boss' favorite "wall o' vines" ... you will rarely get a perfect environment, adjustments are almost always required.
It's late and I'm starting to babble ... ponder the above and let us know if it helped any. There are a great bunch of experienced folks here, and I think this will be the start of a great discussion.
Good Luck
Scott

HP Envy 17t-j100 Distance between USB Slots suggestion

I intended this post as a recommandation for HP.
I have an HP Envy Touchsmart 17t-j100 and everything is excelent up until now.
The only thing that is very annoying is the distance between USB ports. PLEASE increase the distance between USB ports for the future models. I have a lot of problems tryng to connect everything I need.
Even if I try to open the DVD drive, it will stuck in my USB device. I mean how much difficult is to put a distance of 1 cm between them?
If the USB cables are the standard size, there are no problems but most of the USB devices nowadays are much more wider than a standard USB cable and I keep having problems.
I mean it's a 17" laptop, there is plenty of space on the sides. In the end, it's better to drop the DVD drive and put a VGA slot instead, but with bigger distance between USB ports.
I am planning to buy another ENVY in the future but I really want my new laptop to have USB ports with a wider distance bewtween them.
Thank you very much and I hope HP will take care of this little problem on the future models.
Have a nice day.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi @catapara89 ,
Thank you for visiting the HP Support Forums and Welcome. Thanks so much for taking the time to let us know of your suggestions on the USB slots. It is important and has been viewed.
Have a great week.
Thanks.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom to say “Thanks” for helping!

How to calculate the percentage of free space for a table in Oracle

okay, I am a little confused here. I have been searching the web and looking at a lot of documents. What I basically want to find out is this, how do I calculate the difference between the number of bytes a table is using and the total bytes allocated to a table space (going that way to get percent free for a particular table). So I need a byte count of a table and total table space and the percentage difference. I have been looking at the DBA_TABLES DBA_TABLESPACES and DBA_SEGMENTS views. I have tried to calculated the space as num_rows * avg_row_len (if I am wrong, let me know). I have been trying to compare that calculation to the number in DBA_TABLESPACES and DBA_SEGMENTS. I am just looking for the total space allocated to the table space that the table sits in (seem logical right now) to make the percentage value work. Thus I want to be able to track the table as it grows as compated to the table space it sits in to see a value as it changes over time (days, weeks, etc.) each time I run this script I am working on.
Can someone get me straight and help me to find out if I am looking in the right places. Any advice would help.
Edward

You can use a little modified version of dbms_space from Tom, show_space. Have a look,
SQL> create table test222 as select * from all_objects;
Table created.
SQL> delete from test22 where rownum<=100;
delete from test22 where rownum<=100
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
SQL> delete from test222 where rownum<=100;
100 rows deleted.
SQL> analyze table test222 compute statistics;
Table analyzed.
SQL> create or replace procedure show_space
2 ( p_segname in varchar2,
3    p_owner   in varchar2 default user,
4    p_type    in varchar2 default 'TABLE',
5    p_partition in varchar2 default NULL )
6 -- this procedure uses authid current user so it can query DBA_*
7 -- views using privileges from a ROLE and so it can be installed
8 -- once per database, instead of once per user that wanted to use it
9 authid current_user
10 as
11      l_free_blks                 number;
12      l_total_blocks              number;
13      l_total_bytes               number;
14      l_unused_blocks             number;
15      l_unused_bytes              number;
16      l_LastUsedExtFileId         number;
17      l_LastUsedExtBlockId        number;
18      l_LAST_USED_BLOCK           number;
19      l_segment_space_mgmt        varchar2(255);
20      l_unformatted_blocks number;
21      l_unformatted_bytes number;
22      l_fs1_blocks number; l_fs1_bytes number;
23      l_fs2_blocks number; l_fs2_bytes number;
24      l_fs3_blocks number; l_fs3_bytes number;
25      l_fs4_blocks number; l_fs4_bytes number;
26      l_full_blocks number; l_full_bytes number;
27
28      -- inline procedure to print out numbers nicely formatted
29      -- with a simple label
30      procedure p( p_label in varchar2, p_num in number )
31      is
32      begin
33          dbms_output.put_line( rpad(p_label,40,'.') ||
34                                to_char(p_num,'999,999,999,999') );
35      end;
36 begin
37     -- this query is executed dynamically in order to allow this procedure
38     -- to be created by a user who has access to DBA_SEGMENTS/TABLESPACES
39     -- via a role as is customary.
40     -- NOTE: at runtime, the invoker MUST have access to these two
41     -- views!
42     -- this query determines if the object is a ASSM object or not
43     begin
44        execute immediate
45            'select ts.segment_space_management
46               from dba_segments seg, dba_tablespaces ts
47              where seg.segment_name      = :p_segname
48                and (:p_partition is null or
49                    seg.partition_name = :p_partition)
50                and seg.owner = :p_owner
51                and seg.tablespace_name = ts.tablespace_name'
52               into l_segment_space_mgmt
53              using p_segname, p_partition, p_partition, p_owner;
54     exception
55         when too_many_rows then
56            dbms_output.put_line
57            ( 'This must be a partitioned table, use p_partition => ');
58            return;
59     end;
60
61
62     -- if the object is in an ASSM tablespace, we must use this API
63     -- call to get space information, else we use the FREE_BLOCKS
64     -- API for the user managed segments
65     if l_segment_space_mgmt = 'AUTO'
66     then
67       dbms_space.space_usage
68       ( p_owner, p_segname, p_type, l_unformatted_blocks,
69         l_unformatted_bytes, l_fs1_blocks, l_fs1_bytes,
70         l_fs2_blocks, l_fs2_bytes, l_fs3_blocks, l_fs3_bytes,
71         l_fs4_blocks, l_fs4_bytes, l_full_blocks, l_full_bytes, p_partition);
72
73       p( 'Unformatted Blocks ', l_unformatted_blocks );
74       p( 'FS1 Blocks (0-25) ', l_fs1_blocks );
75       p( 'FS2 Blocks (25-50) ', l_fs2_blocks );
76       p( 'FS3 Blocks (50-75) ', l_fs3_blocks );
77       p( 'FS4 Blocks (75-100)', l_fs4_blocks );
78       p( 'Full Blocks        ', l_full_blocks );
79    else
80       dbms_space.free_blocks(
81         segment_owner     => p_owner,
82         segment_name      => p_segname,
83         segment_type      => p_type,
84         freelist_group_id => 0,
85         free_blks         => l_free_blks);
86
87       p( 'Free Blocks', l_free_blks );
88    end if;
89
90    -- and then the unused space API call to get the rest of the
91    -- information
92    dbms_space.unused_space
93    ( segment_owner     => p_owner,
94      segment_name      => p_segname,
95      segment_type      => p_type,
96      partition_name    => p_partition,
97      total_blocks      => l_total_blocks,
98      total_bytes       => l_total_bytes,
99      unused_blocks     => l_unused_blocks,
100      unused_bytes      => l_unused_bytes,
101      LAST_USED_EXTENT_FILE_ID => l_LastUsedExtFileId,
102      LAST_USED_EXTENT_BLOCK_ID => l_LastUsedExtBlockId,
103      LAST_USED_BLOCK => l_LAST_USED_BLOCK );
104
105      p( 'Total Blocks', l_total_blocks );
106      p( 'Total Bytes', l_total_bytes );
107      p( 'Total MBytes', trunc(l_total_bytes/1024/1024) );
108      p( 'Unused Blocks', l_unused_blocks );
109      p( 'Unused Bytes', l_unused_bytes );
110      p( 'Last Used Ext FileId', l_LastUsedExtFileId );
111      p( 'Last Used Ext BlockId', l_LastUsedExtBlockId );
112      p( 'Last Used Block', l_LAST_USED_BLOCK );
113 end;
114
115 /
Procedure created.
SQL> desc show_space
PROCEDURE show_space
Argument Name                  Type                    In/Out Default?
P_SEGNAME                      VARCHAR2                IN
P_OWNER                        VARCHAR2                IN     DEFAULT
P_TYPE                         VARCHAR2                IN     DEFAULT
P_PARTITION                    VARCHAR2                IN     DEFAULT
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> exec show_space('TEST222','SCOTT');
BEGIN show_space('TEST222','SCOTT'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.SHOW_SPACE", line 44
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> conn / as sysdba
Connected.
SQL> grant sysdba to scott;
Grant succeeded.
SQL> conn scott/tiger as sysdba
Connected.
SQL> exec show_space('TEST222','SCOTT');
BEGIN show_space('TEST222','SCOTT'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00201: identifier 'SHOW_SPACE' must be declared
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
SQL> exec scott.show_space('TEST222','SCOTT');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set serveroutput on
SQL> exec scott.show_space('TEST222','SCOTT');
Unformatted Blocks .....................               0
FS1 Blocks (0-25) .....................               0
FS2 Blocks (25-50) .....................               1
FS3 Blocks (50-75) .....................               0
FS4 Blocks (75-100).....................               1
Full Blocks        .....................             807
Total Blocks............................             896
Total Bytes.............................       7,340,032
Total MBytes............................               7
Unused Blocks...........................              65
Unused Bytes............................         532,480
Last Used Ext FileId....................               4
Last Used Ext BlockId...................           1,289
Last Used Block.........................              63
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:5350053031470
I use this to find the space allocations.
Just read your post again,this is not going to show you the percentage of the free/used space. This is going to be the number of blocks which are free/used. For the growth trend, you can look at (in 10g) Oracle EM. It has added now,Segment Growth Trend report which can show you for each object,comparing to the allocated space to the object,how much space is being used by it.
HTH
Aman....

How do I reduce the spacing between icons in Finder windows?

Hi,
I have recently changed the size of my icons to 32x32, and the icon text down to size 10 (default icon sizes looked way too big for my taste).
What seems to be happening though is that all icons are spaced at the same distance than when they were the default size (48x48?) leaving vasts amount of white space in between them.
Is there a way I can change that setting so all icons are closer to each other, not wasting so much empty space?
Thanks,
Julian

In the Format panel under the Text Style tab, there is a ▸ Spacing category. Click it to open, and you will have a selector that defaults to Lines, and to the right, the ability to set your spacing in decimal values. In addition to Lines, you also have At Least, Exactly, and Between capability. You can even set exact line height in points. Check that your Before Paragraph, and After Paragraph settings are correct for your needs.

How to maintain gap between table and graph in a report

HI,
I have a report in which a graph is placed below a table and data in the table gets increased with time , then how to maintain the gap as constant between table and the graph ?? Like i have 50 rows in a table and then next day 10 rows are added but then i want maintain same gap between the table and graph???

>Right click on chart.
>Open the property and go to the relative position.
>Select the distance of the upper left point of the chart in relation to another report element by entering - the number of pixels; the part of the tavfrom which youble want to measure the pixels (in the first drop-down list); the report element from which you want to measure the pixels (in the second drop-down list).
>Repeat this for the distance of the lower left point of the chart.
Hope this will help you out.

Report format - distance between rows

Hi,
After formatting a output(report), the distance between rows is much bigger than on output w/o format.
What parameter controls the distance between rows?
How to make the output/report more dense in row sense?
Thx,

Use BREAK ON column-name SKIP n
where n is how many lines to skip:
sql>create table t (one varchar2(3), two number );
Table created.
sql>insert into t values ('aaa', 1 );
1 row created.
sql>insert into t values ('aaa', 2 );
1 row created.
sql>insert into t values ('bbb', 3 );
1 row created.
sql>break on one skip 2;
sql>select * from t;
ONE TWO
aaa 1
2
bbb 3
(note: this doesn't display in "preview" with correct formatting so just try it and you'll see)

PDF TEMPLATES ISSUE...DISTANCE BETWEEN LINES

Hello People... after a read the manual i tried to do a pdf template based on a legal asset map.
in Manual i read this
'Note: The placement of this field in relationship to the
BODY_START tag defines the distance between the repeating rows
for each occurrence. See Placement of Repeating Fields, page 8-15.'
My template have fixed lines and what i want to do is for each ocurrence put the data inside of line of the template. i tried to adjust commanding the space of start body form field and the repeating group field. Some rows stay's inside of the lines of my template but some rows don't. someone know's a way to do this? i dont understand why the distance between the rows have variations and dont stay always at the same distance of the previous line. I can send my output to anyone.
Tks in advance.

Kenoli,
The objects are interacting because they are Inline (Moves with Text) and/or you have "Causes Wrap" turned on.
With the object selected, go to the Format Pane and the Arrange Tab, set the Object Placement the way you want it and adjust Text Wrap to None.
Jerry

27" iMac: distance between stand base and screen glass?

I searched high and low, but can't find this info anywhere..
On photos of new 27" iMacs, it looks like the front bottom aluminum part of the screen (with Apple logo on it), became narrower comparing to 24" iMacs. Meaning that screen itself is probably positioned lower than on 24" iMacs (which would be terrific)
I wonder if any of 27" iMac owners could be so kind to put their display in vertical 90 degree position and measure the distance between stand base (the top of the table) and the screen glass? I have attached the picture of the measurement I need.
http://img.skitch.com/20091113-r8w77fdkp3aeetukcnw95g44ya.png
Thanks in advance!

I think the answer is 16.3cm. It's the same distance as on the new 21.5" iMacs. I already started a topic myself, asking the same question:
http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10532444#10532444

Reduce space/distance between tables

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for