Reduce window size

How do I reduce the window size in Safari?

Hi mejake,
Mouse over a corner until you see the two-way arrow, then click and move in the direction you wish.
Cheers,
GB

Similar Messages

  • Mail 7.1- Reduce window size in a new email

    I'm having problems reducing the window size when writing a new email. Mail 7.1 does not let me reduce the window size once I introduce a email address.
    Thank you for your help.

    Sorry, I didn't mean maximized in the way the window is fullscreen. I have the window in a normal size 2/3 of the screen - then press CMD+H to hide it. When a mail comes in Mail goes back from hide mode to window mode - very strange. And it is only on emails on my first account. When an email on my MobileMe account arrives it stays hidden in the dock.
    Maybe it is because I installed FlagIt from http://www.tastyapps.com - a little addon to mark emails with colores and flags. Will check this.

  • How reduce window size?

    I'm using a Mac Pro, OS X 10.7.2, Picasa 3: the window can't be reduced in size and the hatch marks are behind the dock, positioned on the bottom.  How do I make the window smaller?  I've tried moving the dock to the side and still the hatch marks don't make the window smaller, when I click and hold on them and then move the mouse. 

    I've tried clicking on the green button, which makes the window bigger, and then dragging the hatch marks on the lower right of window to the smaller size I want, but it won't make the window smaller.

  • Reduce window size by Create_popup_to_confirm

    Hi Gurus,
    I need to generate a popup of reduced size in Webdynpro for ABAP. I have Netweaver 7.0.
    When I use the method Create_popup_to_confirm it generates a popup of default size even though I pass the height and width parameters. I need to reduce the size. Please tell me what are the options to do so in Netweaver 7.0
    Thanks
    Roshan

    Hi sanjay ,
    use the method set windoe size after you called the method create popup to confirm , give your size value in '%'
    data : lv_text type string_table .
    wd_comp_controller->popup_01 = lo_window_manager->CREATE_POPUP_TO_CONFIRM(
        TEXT                 = lv_text
        BUTTON_KIND          = ls_popup_properties-button_kind
    *    MESSAGE_TYPE         =
    *    CLOSE_BUTTON         = ABAP_TRUE
        WINDOW_TITLE         = 'Resized window '
    *    WINDOW_LEFT_POSITION =
    *    WINDOW_TOP_POSITION  =
    *    WINDOW_POSITION      =
    *    WINDOW_WIDTH         =
    *    WINDOW_HEIGHT        =
    *    DEFAULT_BUTTON       =
    wd_comp_controller->popup_01->SET_WINDOW_SIZE                           " popup_01 type if_wd_window
        WIDTH  = '75%'
        HEIGHT = '75%'                  
    let me know if you face any problem in this
    Regards
    chinnaiya .P

  • Reducing window size

    I need to make my parallels window smaller on my OSX desktop the tab to make it smaller is off the screen on the bottom of the screen.

    Click on the minimize gadget (middle of the three on the top left) then resize. However, if you are referring to the window size when running Windows, then change the Windows' screen resolution.

  • How Do I Reduce Window Size/Find Audio Track

    I am using Elements 4.0 and it works fine except for two issues. When I launch the software, the windows are larger than my monitor screen and I have to drag the windows around to see and access the buttons for the features. I have a 17" monitor and have it set to the highest quality (32 bit, which is 800 x 600 pixels). If I reduce the quality, this will probably interfere with editing color in the images.
    Secondly, in the Help section under audio it shows an audio bar under the thumbnails and says you can drag the audio bar to designate where to start music. I cannot find the window that displays the audio bar. It's not in the Organizer for slide shows. Can anyone help?
    Thanks ...

    Thanks. I tried that and it worked. I can now see the entire windows on my monitor screen. And the audio track now shows up in the edit window below the images. It's now possible to right click on the tracks, delete the ones I'm not satisfied with and add new ones.
    However, for others out there, the change in screen resolution reduced my desktop and other windows that I open in other programs and makes it difficult for this 66 year old man to see. So I have to toggle back and forth, in between using Elements 4.0 and other programs. But that's no big deal ... just another hoop to jump through.
    Thanks for the tip.
    Allen

  • When i use pogo, on the risk game for instance, when i click on a game room, a window pops up and immdediately reduces in size, this size only shows part of the battle screen; i have tried resetting the zoom feature, no luck.

    i have seen this before on my home PC (on a lap top now) it is impossible for me to correct so i have to use IE to play pogo (i dont like IE it is slower) i click on a game, i go to a game room, and a window normally pops up showing the tables. normally i click on a seat and it takes me to a new window and the game board. NOW, when this first window pops up, it is aboout 1/4 size of my screen, but immediately reduces in size to about 1/6 of my screen. wnen the game loads, i cannot view the whole screen only part of the screen, as if it is zoomed in. I tried your suggestion and reset the zoom, no help.... i changed the zoom level manally.... no help.
    this also happens in scrabble and most other games. it is related to the java i am sure, but it only happens on firefox. How do i correct this. I have uninstalled, and reinstalled firefox. i have had this happen on the older version of firefox. it happens on multiple computers so it isnt just one computer.
    HELP!!!!!
    please

    I should have explained further. The game opens in a new window over to the upper left of my screen, leaving the original page underneath. I tried minimizing it so that I could get to my toolbar and did the View > Zoom > Reset. This has no effect. The lower portion of the game is still not showing. Using other browsers the window or frame of the game is much larger, therefore everything shows.

  • How to reduce the size of winsxs in windows 7 ultimate x64

    Ok so first off there are some caveats to responding to this question
    1.) Im on windows 7, so DONT refer to some "winsxs is important" vista link...
    2.) i am well aware of what windows side by side is for, and appreciate dll ____ must be bad for some... but lets be honest, professional people like me know how to keep a system in shape and not remove DLL files willy nilly and should have some kind of
    "i know what im doing" option
    3.) i know its important system files blah blah blah
    4.) i know it MUST be possible to trim this... vsp1cln.exe and compcln.exe from vista sp1 and sp2 respectively shows it CAN be done
    so in light of that, as there is no vsp1cln.exe or compcln.exe included on windows 7 i need to know if they are compatible with windows 7 if i just pull down a version from vista.
    if not, there must be some kind of method to reduce winsxs size... mine is currently at 6.2GB and that... frankly... is too big, i can understand a few GB worth, but 6! thats a whole windows xp installation!
    now, if a utility could be written that would be detrimental to compatibility but acceptable in terms of limited damage then that would be good, perhaps removing the ability to uninstall updates if for example, your system has been stable since february
    i know i wont have problems and have the retail disk if it gets fubar.
    I cant see what all that folder is for... i mean if you dont want such compatibility or the ability to install extra components without finding the disk then you should be able to remove that... i dont use a lot of the server side components, so why cant
    i remove those.
    also winsxs uses a lot of hardlinks and junctions that are reporting hard drive usage that isnt actually used as explorer counts these files repeatedly, there must be a way to tell explorer not to count those files... it might be all well and good to say
    theres 2gb not actually being used, but if windows is throwing a fit because it thinks im out of space then those 2gb might as well be 2 TB for all the use they are to me.
    lets take for example the winsxs/backup folder, there are about 60% of that taken up with FONT BACKUPS... i mean SERIOUSLY! ... you backed up the FONTS!?
    WHY!?!?
    There must be more things like those that could go
    perhaps someone could get back in touch and explain why microsoft windows is the ONLY operating system that seems to think that if it doesnt have 80 hundred million backups and spares it wont work... linux does not have this side by side thing, nor does
    macosx

    Okay maybe some background on the root of the problem would help.
    Windows XP (and Windows 2000) used a fast and great mechanism called Hotfix Installer (Update.exe) to install updates. Updates installed in very little time. If you wanted to further reduce update times on Windows XP, you could just temporarily stop the
    System Restore service and updates would install at crazy speeds. Note that this is not recommended for novice users who don't know advanced recovery methods, as some updates can sometimes cause your system to stop booting so you cannot even uninstall them.
    The method the Hotfix Installer used was simple, it just installed a new version of files to be updated at %windir%\system32 and %windir%\system32\dllcache (the Windows File Protection cache). For files that were in use, a restart copied them from dllcache
    to the system32 folder. This is simple file-based servicing. The hotfix installer (Update.exe) also supported various command line switches like /nobackup which means not to backup files it patches. Again, this is not recommended for novice users as some updates
    can screw your system even after the comprehensive testing Microsoft does before releasing them. But if you won't be uninstalling any updates (usually one only requires uninstalling updates if they cause problems), you could save a ton of disk space by not
    backing up the files it patched. The Hotfix Installer backed up files to C:\Windows\$Uninstall$KBxxxxxx folders so even if you did back up the files at install time, they could be safely deleted after a few days if no stability issues were found after using
    Windows with the newest updates applied. Update.exe also supported the very important and convenient ability to slipstream a service pack or update into the original Windows setup files using the /s switch.    
    When Microsoft was developing Windows Vista, they realized that components had gotten too many interdepencies on each other and to service each file reliably without breaking another component that relied on it, Microsoft introduced what they called as Component
    Based Servicing (CBS). You can read all about it in a much more technical way at The Servicing Guy's blog. What CBS does basically is it installs all files of the entire operating system, including all languages into C:\Windows\WinSxS and then it hard-links
    files from there to C:\Windows\system32. This has the benefit of not having to insert the OS disc to add or remove any components, and some other advantages as well like offline servicing of a Windows Vista or Windows 7 image. But the design introduces a major
    disadvantage of taking up a lot of hard disk space. Whenever an update is installed, it no longer installs it to C:\Windows\system32 and C:\Windows\system32\dllcache like Windows XP's hotfix installer (Update.exe) did. Instead, it updates the files in C:\Windows\WinSxS.
    Now, Windows keeps multiple copies of the same file but with different version in WinSxS if it is used by more than one Windows component. The higher the number of components, that many number of times the file exists in C:\Windows\WinSxS. When a Windows Vista
    update (.MSU) is installed, the components get updated, each and every one, instead of the files and the worst part is it still maintains the older superseded previous versions of components in WinSxS so the user would be able to uninstall updates. Microsoft
    does say that some sort of "scavenging" or deleting older copies of components takes place but is scarce on the details. The scavenging seems to take place automatically at certain intervals in Windows 7 but not in Windows Vista. In Windows Vista, you have
    to add or remove any Windows component for the scavenging to take place. And Microsoft says the scavenging will free up some disk space but in practice, on my system, I see my free disk space only decreasing on Vista as I remove or add any component. Windows
    does not give the user an option to not backup the earlier versions of components like Windows XP's /nobackup switch in Hotfix Installer did. As as you install more and more updates on your system, they will take more and more disk space. This is one of the
    primary reasons Windows Vista and Windows 7 are so bloated. Another reason for them being so bloated is the DriverStore that these OSes store. All drivers that are shipped with the OS and the OEM ones which you download and which are installed for a particular
    system are staged in C:\Windows\System32\DriverStore. But let's not go there for now.
    Now, an important thing to note is that the size of the WinSxS folder is not what Explorer or the dir command report, it is far less but is misreported by Explorer because it counts the hard links more than once when calculating size. That does not mean,
    the size of WinSxS is not causing real-world disk space problems on numerous Windows Vista/7 systems in use today. Microsoft's ingenious recommendation to this problem of ever growing disk consumption is to install fewer updates to keep the size of the servicing
    store under control. Of course, users cannot deny installing security updates and leave their system open to security holes. What they can do is install less optional updates, the ones that Microsoft releases on the fourth Tuesday of every month and also install
    less of the hotfixes that are available by request from a Knowledge Base article. In short, you have to trade the number of bugs fixed in the OS by installing hotfixes at the cost of enormous amounts of disk space. The whole servicing stack is a total downgrade
    to Windows XP's update.exe method. It causes heavy disk thrashing and slow logoffs/logons while Windows configures these updates at the Welcome Screen. Many systems are unable to boot because of failed updates. Another disadvantage of the "new" servicing stack
    (and the redesigned Setup mechanism of Windows Vista) is the inability to do a true slipstream of service packs and hotfixes.
    The time it takes to actually install these hotfixes online compared to Windows XP is also completely unacceptable. When you start installing an MSU update, it spends a lot of time determining whether the update applies to your system. Then, the update itself
    takes much longer to install compared to Windows XP's Update.exe (hours instead of minutes if you are installing dozens of updates through a script). Finally, that post-installation process ("Configuring updates... Do not turn off your computer") takes several
    minutes before shut down followed by a second post-installation process (configuration) upon restart before logon that also takes also several minutes and thrashes the disk.
    I can install the entire SP3 for Windows XP in about 10 minutes after downloading the full installer. I can also install a slipstreamed-with-SP3 copy of Windows XP is about 45 minutes on a modern fast PC. In contrast, Windows Vista or Windows 7 do install
    relatively quickly (in just about 15-20 minutes) on a modern PC but installing the service packs and updates takes more time than anything on XP did. Not only can service packs not be slipstreamed, but Vista Service Packs are not even cumulative, which means
    if you clean install Windows Vista today, you have to install SP1 first which takes about 90 minutes, then SP2 which takes less time, then all the post-SP2 updates which do take hours to install. If you really HAVE to use Windows 7 or Windows Vista, you are
    stuck with this slow update non-sense as Microsoft does not even acknowledge that there is any slowdown or loss of functionality in the new servicing mechanism. The fact remains: MSU updates are slow as **** and take too much time and as Windows 7/Vista get
    older and Microsoft stops producing service packs, a clean install is going to take longer and longer to bring it up-to-date with all patches installed. Is is worth wasting your time on an OS whose servicing mechanism Microsoft completely screwed up? I once
    again recommend you read more about the servicing stack and how it operates at The Servicing Guy's blog:http://blogs.technet.com/b/joscon/. To fix this messed up servicing stack, Microsoft also offers a tool
    called CheckSUR for your system if it finds “inconsistencies in the servicing store”.
    Microsoft's Windows Vista and Windows 7 products are not engineered with disk space in mind. It causes a problem, especially for SSDs which are still low capacity and very expensive. The only hope is that Microsoft again completely redesigns this servicing
    mechanism in a future Windows release so it would not cause this growing disk space consumption issue, speed up installation of updates by an order of magnitude, not slow down logon and logoff, not prevent systems becoming unusable because of failed updates
    being stuck at a particular stage and allow true slipstreaming.
    Microsoft's response to this is vague - they simply state "Windows 7's servicing is more reliable than Windows XP" but they cannot acknowledge it is a million times slower and still unreliable...slow to the point of being unusable and sometimes leaving systems
    in an unbootable damaged state. Of course they know all this too but can't admit it since it makes their latest OSes look poor. Moving from a very simple and fast update mechanism that worked to a complex one that requires endless “configuring” and repair
    through CheckSUR is a product engineering defect.
    Take a look at servicing-related complaints in Microsoft's own forums:
    1.
    Very slow install of updates to Windows 7
    2.
    Windows 7 - Updates are very slow
    3.
    Windows 7 Ultimate, it takes long time configuring updates
    4.
    "Preparing To Configure Windows. Please Do Not Turn Off Your Computer"
    5.
    Very slow update install at shutdown (Windows 7 Home Premium)
    6.
    Why does my computer run so slow when installing updates?
    7.
    Every time the computer is shut down, it always says installing update do not turn off your computer
    8.
    Computer is working slow and wants to do windows updates all the time
    9.
    Windows 7 Update install time taking a very long time
    10.
    Windows wants to install 6 updates every time I log off or put the computer in sleep mode
    11.
    Problem In Configuring Windows Updates at the time of Startup
    12.
    Computer really slow after latest updates
    13.
    Windows hangs up in "configuring updates"
    14.
    Why can't windows 7 install updates?
    15.
    Every time computer is shut down, receive Installing updates, do not shut off....
    16.
    How long does it take for the Windows 7 Home Premium updates take?
    17.
    Windows 7 "Installing Update 2 of 2" for 12 hours now
    18.
    Updates causes endless reboots
    19.
    Updates stuck installing for over 24 hrs. Computer does not boot
    20.
    Cannot load Windows 7 after installing 2 critical updates
    A proper solution to this problem would be to completely re-engineer and rewrite the servicing mechanism so it operates with the speed, reliability and pain-free operation of the XP servicing mechanism.
    I don't see this situation improving in Windows 8 either. Good luck with your Windows tablet taking hours to install service packs and updates. Now, do iPads take that long to install updates?
    So fact is Microsoft understates or conveniently hides the real system requirements to keep a Windows 7/Vista system running. System requirements are install time may be 15 GB of free disk space but over time, this number increasing is unacceptable, especially
    for people's SSDs which are running out of disk space!

  • I am on a Windows 7 OS attempting to reduce pdf size with my Adobe Acrobat Standard XI & Pro.  The application keeps timing out and  at the Subsetting embedded fonts portion and the application gives "Adobe Acrobat has stopped working" and then closes.  T

    I am on a Windows 7 OS attempting to reduce pdf size with my Adobe Acrobat Standard XI & Pro.  The application keeps timing out and  at the Subsetting embedded fonts portion and the application gives "Adobe Acrobat has stopped working" and then closes.  The document is 275 pages.  Is there something I can do to stop this?

    Hi Ricci,
    Since when are you facing this issue? Did you tried system restore to a date before this problem occured.
    Does acrobat stop working when you open this specific pdf file or with any pdf file that you open?
    Regards,
    Rahul

  • Reduce Popup Window Size

    Hello Experts,
    I have one popup window, the height and width of popup window is being displayed too large.
    I am using method window set_window_size() and passing the parameter u2018Width = 20%u2019 and u2018Height = 30%' but it doesnu2019t work. How to reduce Popup Window Size?
    Could you please suggest me?
    Thanks.

    Check out this post POPUP WINDOW .
    I think the popup size will work in later SP level, instead of work on height and width of the popup specify the size of the called UI  container.
    Sergio

  • On a certain website the window size has become so huge I cannot use certain features and am unable to reduce the window size myself. It went huge as I was moving the cursor and I have been unable to ajust this. How do I alter screen size manually?

    Sometimes when moving the cursor the window size on certain sites reduces or increases. This happens randomly and I am not able to make it happen to change the size of the screen to my choice. The window on a particular site is now so huge I am unable to use features on there as they do not come into view on my window at all. Please help me on how to control this feature or in other words how do I increase or decrease the window size manually.

    See "Resizing oversize window" - MozillaZine Knowledge Base
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Resizing_oversize_window
    There are a couple of extensions tat could also be involved
    <br><small>Please mark "Solved" one answer that will best help others with a similar problem -- hope this was it.</small>

  • How to reduce the size of the confirmation pop up window?

    Hello All.
    In my application I have used confirmation pop up, for updating the users about the actions they have performed.
    But the size of the pop up window is too big.
    I want to reduce the size of the pop up window.
    How can I achieve this?
    Regards,
    SampathKumar.

    >
    Thomas Jung wrote:
    > The popup automatically resizes to its inner content. If you are reusing one of the standard SAP-Provided confirmation popups, then you really can't control the size.
    Hi Thomas!
    Yes, it is true, but in our HR system after an SP upgrade it dosn't works.
    Look at my thread, you can see an image 'BEFORE and AFTER' !
    [Popup size error in Webdynpro for ABAP|Popup size error in Webdynpro for ABAP]
    Thanks.

  • How do I get things to expand/contract with window size?

    RE: www.hawaiihosa.org
    I'm working on a website for my organization...and it looks
    alright when the windows of internet explorer and firefox are
    expanded...but when the windows are smaller, the heading remains
    the same size, and the text moves behind my vertical menu bar on
    the left.
    Is there a way to make it so that the header is the same
    width (with proportional height) as the width of the white area? I
    think the white area is set to a width of 80 percent or something.
    When windows are smaller, is there a way to make it so that
    the text in the body of the pages stays where they originally were
    (to the right of the menu bar...and not behind)?
    Another thing not related to window size...how do I get the
    text to be vertically in line on one side? Whenever write anything
    and it extends below the menu bar, it uses the full white space. I
    want it to have the same width of writing space as the rest of the
    page. In other words, I want it to be constricted to the right of
    the menu bar with the text being justified to the left.
    Hopefully someone can halp us with this.
    Thank you very much!
    Maurice Nakamura
    If you didn't get the url...its
    www.hawaiihosa.org

    I would set the page to adhere to a minimum width. Add
    min-width: 610px;
    to your css as shown below. (this won't work in IE browsers
    prior to 7
    so if you want to support that google min-width for IE6)
    .twoColLiqLtHdr #container {
    width: 80%; /* this will create a container 80% of the
    browser width */
    background: #FFFFFF;
    min-width: 610px;
    margin: 0 auto; /* the auto margins (in conjunction with a
    width)
    center the page */
    border: 1px solid #000000;
    text-align: left; /* this overrides the text-align: center
    on the body
    element. */
    To have the text vertically inline on one side as you put it
    try adding
    this to your css stylesheet:
    #container p {
    margin-left: 190px;
    Instead of the width for the side bar being 24% make it 170px
    as shown
    below:
    .twoColLiqLtHdr #sidebar1 {
    float: left;
    width: 170px; /* since this element is floated, a width must
    be given */
    background: #FFFFFF; /* the background color will be
    displayed for the
    length of the content in the column, but no further */
    padding: 15px 0; /* top and bottom padding create visual
    space within
    this div */
    You cant really make your header img grow/reduce in size as
    the page is
    enlarged or narrowed because it would distort. What you need
    to do is
    find a place to slice it into sections wherebay you can have
    part of it
    as a repeating background image i.e., the left and right side
    of the
    image remains on the left and right but the bit in the middle
    repeats
    itself as the browser window is widened and narrowed.
    This needs to be taken into account when designing a liquid
    page.
    MauriceNakamura wrote:
    > RE: www.hawaiihosa.org
    >
    > I'm working on a website for my organization...and it
    looks alright when the
    > windows of internet explorer and firefox are
    expanded...but when the windows
    > are smaller, the heading remains the same size, and the
    text moves behind my
    > vertical menu bar on the left.
    > Is there a way to make it so that the header is the same
    width (with
    > proportional height) as the width of the white area? I
    think the white area is
    > set to a width of 80 percent or something.
    > When windows are smaller, is there a way to make it so
    that the text in the
    > body of the pages stays where they originally were (to
    the right of the menu
    > bar...and not behind)?
    > Another thing not related to window size...how do I get
    the text to be
    > vertically in line on one side? Whenever write anything
    and it extends below
    > the menu bar, it uses the full white space. I want it to
    have the same width of
    > writing space as the rest of the page. In other words, I
    want it to be
    > constricted to the right of the menu bar with the text
    being justified to the
    > left.
    >
    > Hopefully someone can halp us with this.
    >
    > Thank you very much!
    > Maurice Nakamura
    >
    > If you didn't get the url...its
    http://www.hawaiihosa.org
    >

  • OCR and Reducing file size

    I have a large document (a book) that I am trying to scan. I will be scanning it chapter by chapter. The book was printed in grayscale, so I don't have a pure BLACK AND WHITE document. I would like to optimize the file size, but I have a few questions about that.
    Currently running:
    Windows 7
    Acrobat Pro X
    Epson GT-S80 High-speed scanner
    1. What is a good typical workflow? I have tried scanning the documents to PDF using the scanner's software then opening them up in Acrobat to OCR them. I have tried using Acrobat's Scan feature with OCR being one of the steps in the scanning process. I have tried letting both softwares do their own color mode detection, where they will mix black and white and grayscale to reduce the file size, but have typically told it to stick with grayscale because that gives me the cleanest and clearest document. Does anyone have any recommendations on getting a good quality image and using a mix of black and white, as well as grayscale, or should I keep using just grayscale?
    2. I am having some trouble, I think, with the file size. I have a 12 page document I believe was either scanned at 300 dpi or was scanned at full resolution because I used CLEARSCAN, and downsampled everything to 300 dpi. I don't remember exactly, but that file is about 2.20 MB in size, and I think that runs about 185K per page. I would think there could be a way to get a smaller file.
    3. For text recognition purposes, this document is not ideal because it is a collection of powerpoint slide sheets (2 - 3 slides per page), and in some cases there is text on top of image in the slides, and it seems very hard to discern.
    4. Once a document has been scanned, and OCR has been run on it, I was under the impression that the OCR is in a separate layer, and that (if Searchable Text is chosen), you basically have a scanned image with another layer of searchable text. Because the OCR'd text is "there somewhere", is it possible to remove the scanned image text, and have just the raw recognized text, similar to if I created the document in Word, and created a PDF?
    5. Sort of back to number 1, suppose I am stuck with leaving the scanned image behind, and just running OCR, what is the optimal way to reduce the file size of the PDF? I had read that running your scan at 600 dpi may help with the text recognition. The same article suggested doing the higher resolution scan and using the ClearScan because it would  a) recognize the text better and  b) convert the text image to actual text and reduce the file size. From there, should I then just run the PDF optimizer to downsample the images to a certain DPI to further reduce the size?
    Hopefully you all can understand what I am saying and help fill in some gaps.
    Thanks,
    Ian

    Let us know if this tutorial helps you with your workflow Acrobat X: Taking the guesswork out of scanning to PDF.

  • How do I lock in a reduced screen size, so whenever FF starts, the reduced screen size appears?

    How do I "lock in" a reduced screen size (that I made by dragging the screen edges) so that whenever I start FF the reduced screen size always appears?

    Make sure that you do not start Firefox maximized.
    You can check that in the Properties of the (desktop) shortcut.
    Firefox should reopen with the window size with which it was closed the previous time.

Maybe you are looking for