Reducing background image size

Hi all,
I'm working with Captivate 4 and have made a screencast of a particular process for training purposes.
The project has 80 slides - but each background image is 1800+kb. Overall the project comes out at 3 MB even with the highest possible compression in the publishing settings.
The project is to be hosted on the Web so I really don't need this kind of detail in the background images and I can't find anyway to reduce the image size apart from exporting each of the 80 backgrounds into Photoshop, reducing them in size and importing them back into Catptivate. For 80 slides this would take too long.
So, two questions:
How can the background image size be reduced within Captivate?
How can I change the settings so when capturing screenshots the image sizes are smaller in the first place?
Thanks in advance for any tips,
Neil
Is there anyway the

Thanks Lilybiri
I've bene recording at full screen (1024x768 or close enough) in order to get the largest recording space possible - and then resizing the project to 800x600 for the web production. The problem is that there is no optimise for web setting (or none that I can see). I just did another test and each background image is 3000kb - way over the top for something that will be viewed on the web.
Does this help you get a fuller picture? Any advice?
Thanks for sparing your time to answer here btw - much appreciated
Neil

Similar Messages

  • Do I need to reduce the images size in pixels before upload them to M.Me?

    Do I need to reduce the images size in pixels (actual size jpeg 5616 × 3744 pixels/766kb) before upload them from iPhoto to a Mobile Me Gallery?
    Otherwise they will be heavy or the upload process take care of that?
    It would be nice that iPhoto took care and optimize the images to display online without any more work, because I´ve 1200 images to upload and they´re jpegs 5616 × 3744 pixels. It´s just to viewing purposes. Not o download or print.
    Thanks.

    In fact no matter if I use a High or Medium compression size JPEG, the size after upload is the same.
    Starts with 1,5 MB/5600px (high) or 780kb/5600px (medium) JPEG and ends after upload in 115kb for a 1024px image.
    This means that iPhoto auto compress in order to publish to Mobile Me, even if we start with a bigger file.
    I hope this info is useful to others.
    Thanks.

  • 8851 Background Image size

    I'm having problems with the thumbnail images on a 8551 phone.
    According to the docs at www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cuipph/8811_8841_8851_8861/10_5/english/adminguide/P881_BK_A92A3B94_00_adminguide-8811_41_51_61-10_5/P881_BK_A92A3B94_00_adminguide-8811_41_51_61-10_5_chapter_01010.html the thumbnail image sizes for the 8851 are 25% of the main image size (which is 800x480 at 24 bit colour depth so the thumbnail would be 200x120) But a few lines further down, the docs say the image size should be 159x109 (which is NOT 25% of the background image size and is a different aspect ratio.)
    I tried to open a couple of the existing thumbnails from Desktops/800x480x24 on my TFTP server, but they don't appear to be regonised as image files by my computer.
    I've tried images of 159x109x24 bit colour and 200x120x24 bit colour, all PNG, but none of them work as thumbnails.
    What are the specs of the thumbnail files for the 8851 phones?
    GTG

    Take a look at this bug:
    Documentation: background image size/path for 88xx phones is 800x480x24
    CSCus27001

  • Email-to facilitate emailing a photo by gmail or AOL, I reduce the file size.  Is it better to reduce the image size or increase the jpg compression?

    To facilitate emailing a photo by gmail or AOL and avoid overwhelming the recipient's screen, I reduce the file size.  Is it better to reduce the image size or increase the jpg compression?  I have been making a duplicate image of 35 MB and reducing the image size to 8"x12" at 72 resolution giving a file size of 1.4 MB.  Then I SAVE AS a jpg of medium compression giving a  file size of about 111 KB.  Overkill?

    Go to File>save for web.
    I usually make the long side 800 px
    At the bottom of the dialog, check "constrain proportions."
    At the top, select JPEG in the dropdown for the file format.
    All the work is done for you! 72px/in is ok for web work. 240-300px/in is the recommended range for printing.

  • Reducing JPEG image size - jaggies in InDesign CC and Photoshop CC

    I have a high-res jpeg, 600ppi, 11 inches by 6.603 inches. The image is 4.21 MB, so there's plenty of data.
    I need to make it smaller to go into an InDesign document for print. I've been noticing this issue for awhile with CC. Recently I downsized a JPEG of line art in Photoshop for a poster, and it looked just awful.
    When I reduce the size to 300ppi, and 4" wide, bicubic sharper, I'm noticing that diagonals especially look really jaggy. The smaller I go, the worse the jaggies are. This is counterintuitive, because I'm reducing the size of the image.
    I have the Display Performance set to high-quality, with Allow Object-Level Display settings checked.
    When I place the CMYK reduced-size JPEG onto the page, the diagonals look jaggy. I thought it was a monitor issue, and that is contributing to it, but when I print out the page on my printer, the diagonals are still kind of jaggy. I tried placing a TIFF, and oh, my, that was twice as bad. I tried placing a PDF. Ugh.
    I've tried reducing the image to the exact size in Photoshop so I don't have to scale it in ID, then placing the image, and still jaggies.
    I've tried taking that image and dragging it from Bridge into the ID File. Still jaggies.
    I did print the image out directly from Photoshop at the smaller size, and it looks perfect.
    What could be happening? Is there a way to fix it? I'm working on a bunch of print work with some really nice photos in them (for a couple of real estate clients), and I'm afraid when the collateral gets printed, it's going to look like crap.

    Recently I downsized a JPEG of line art in Photoshop for a poster, and it looked just awful.
    When I reduce the size to 300ppi, and 4" wide,
    If it's really line art (no gray values) then 300ppi isn't enough. Line art needs to be closer to the output resolution (800-1200 ppi), and shouldn't be saved as JPEG.

  • Problems with the background image size in a photobook

    Hi there, I really need help here. When I make a photobook I want to display my images large, taking the whole page. To do that I put the image as a background and it's OK. My problem is that when I do this, iPhoto always crops it. I have to use the move tool to move the image up and down, left or right to chose a best position. I don't want to do this, I want my image to be shown perfectly from end to end. I have to resize the image in many ways, even used the book's native resolution but it still doesn't work. If I choose "fit photo to frame size" I end up with two stripes at the top and the bottom of the page.
    Please help me, what size should I resize my image to, so that iPhoto displays it as it is?
    Thank you

    Hi
    The fact you are using a Mac is why both myself and JCellini assumed you where using a pre IE7 version.
    But the code you are using to test in IE will cause a problem with any 'virtual machine' such as crossover, because it cannot reference anything outside its own assigned section of the drive, and referencing the png in the way you are would be for it an invalid reference, it also would not work in any browser when you uploaded the site.
    Change - background-image:url(file:///Macintosh  HD/Users/myname/Documents/websites/test/Test/images/test_back.png);
    To - background-image:url(images/test_back.png);
    But if the region is not editable I would suggest you temporarily make it so, externalize your css to a css file, insert a link to the external css file in your head content, then lock the region once again. This way you will always be able to edit your css without worrying about 'locked regions'.
    PZ
    www.pziecina.com

  • Resizing browser to background image size

    I am trying to redo my website and I want to have a large landscape image on the opening page and for the browser to automatically resize to the proportions of the images and for the image to change in size when the browser window is changed in size.
    To make it easier to understand I want it to work like this:-
    http://www.lachapellestudio.com/
    I don't want a 'border' to appear at any point. Does anyone know a small HTML snippet that will make this work???

    > Does a background image have to be smaller than a
    certain size in order to
    > show up as your background on a web page
    no
    -Darrel

  • Lightroom 1.4.1:  Reducing File/Image Size for Web/E-Mail

    This should be a simple thing.
    I need to reduce my file size to upload it into various things on the web and e-mail and what not.  Sometimes it asks for a specific size.
    Right now, I'm using the Export function to do this, which means I have to reset the Image Settings each time in order to get to the size required.
    Isn't there and easier way to do this, like just type in the image size you want and have the program reset the image proportionately?
    Is there a ratio chart for this, like 1000 x 1400 = # of bytes?
    This is a function used all the time--I can't believe it's this cumbersome.

    Banktank wrote:
    (a)     How do I know I am selecting the correct pixel size for e-mail?  Just keep hunting and pecking until I find the right mix or is there a number combination that works consistently?  And if the latter is correct, what is that number combination.
    I just can't believe that reducing the MP size to get it in shape for an e-mail "thumbprint" photo is this tough.  Even with the 'preset', I'd have to set up a preset for every picture because they vary by MP and the scaling seems to change.
    There is no "standard" size for sending images via email. Just make it small. There is a save for email preset in recent releases of Lr. You can download the demo and see what that entails.
    You don't have to create a preset for each picture. I don't know what you would say that. Yes, the amount it compress varies with the information in the image, but this has always been the case with JPEGs. You don't have to make an image that is exactly some size. You just have to make it small enough for most MTAs and MUAs to handle. Since there is no real standard for this, just make it small enough for you.
    Something like 800px on the longest side, 70-80% quality should do it to find the JPEG compression sweet-spot.

  • Fitting background image size according to link text

    I am using a list for my navigation. I have a background
    image which is shown on the LI. If the text in the link is longer
    than the width of the image then the background image is repeated.
    How can I stretch the width of the image?
    Does it look like I am putting the background image in the
    right place? Am I doing this right? Thanks a lot
    <style type="text/css">
    BODY {
    PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: small;
    PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; COLOR: #000; PADDING-TOP: 0px;
    FONT-FAMILY: "Trebuchet MS", arial, helvetica, sans-serif;
    BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; TEXT-ALIGN: center; min-width: 740px
    #navbar {CLEAR: both; MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 760px;
    bgColor=#cccccc
    #navbar LI {
    background-image: url(britishalliance/navback.gif);
    PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; DISPLAY: inline; PADDING-LEFT: 0px;
    PADDING-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px;
    LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none
    #navbar UL {
    LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none;
    #navbar A:link {
    background-image: url(britishalliance/navback.gif);
    BORDER-RIGHT: #c63 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 6px;
    PADDING-LEFT: 6px; FONT-SIZE: 12px; FLOAT: left; PADDING-BOTTOM:
    5px; COLOR: black; LINE-HEIGHT: 10px; PADDING-TOP: 5px;
    WHITE-SPACE: nowrap; TEXT-DECORATION: none
    </style>
    <DIV id=navbar>
    <UL><LI><A href="">aaaaaa aaaa
    aaaaaaaaaa</A>
    <LI><A href="">aaaaa aa aa aaaaaaaa</A>
    <LI><A href="">aaaaa aa aaaaaaaa</A>
    <LI><A href="">aaaaaaaaa</A>
    <LI><A href="">aaaaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaa</A>
    <LI><A href="">aaaaaa aa</A></LI>
    </UL></DIV>

    > How can I stretch the width of the image?
    You cannot. But you can prevent it from tiling with CSS.
    > Does it look like I am putting the background image in
    the right place?
    It's not necessary to have it on both the <a> and the
    <li> tags.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "Hydrowizard" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    >I am using a list for my navigation. I have a background
    image which is
    >shown
    > on the LI. If the text in the link is longer than the
    width of the image
    > then
    > the background image is repeated. How can I stretch the
    width of the
    > image?
    > Does it look like I am putting the background image in
    the right place? Am
    > I
    > doing this right? Thanks a lot
    >
    > <style type="text/css">
    > BODY {
    > PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 0px; FONT-SIZE: small;
    PADDING-BOTTOM:
    > 0px;
    > MARGIN: 0px; COLOR: #000; PADDING-TOP: 0px; FONT-FAMILY:
    "Trebuchet MS",
    > arial,
    > helvetica, sans-serif; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff;
    TEXT-ALIGN: center;
    > min-width:
    > 740px
    > }
    > #navbar {CLEAR: both; MARGIN: 0px; WIDTH: 760px;
    bgColor=#cccccc
    > }
    > #navbar LI {
    > background-image: url(britishalliance/navback.gif);
    > PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; DISPLAY: inline; PADDING-LEFT: 0px;
    PADDING-BOTTOM:
    > 0px;
    > MARGIN: 0px; PADDING-TOP: 0px; LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none
    > }
    > #navbar UL {
    > LIST-STYLE-TYPE: none;
    > }
    > #navbar A:link {
    > background-image: url(britishalliance/navback.gif);
    > BORDER-RIGHT: #c63 1px solid; PADDING-RIGHT: 6px;
    PADDING-LEFT: 6px;
    > FONT-SIZE: 12px; FLOAT: left; PADDING-BOTTOM: 5px;
    COLOR: black;
    > LINE-HEIGHT:
    > 10px; PADDING-TOP: 5px; WHITE-SPACE: nowrap;
    TEXT-DECORATION: none
    > }
    > </style>
    >
    >
    > <DIV id=navbar>
    > <UL><LI><A href="">aaaaaa aaaa
    aaaaaaaaaa</A>
    > <LI><A href="">aaaaa aa aa
    aaaaaaaa</A>
    > <LI><A href="">aaaaa aa aaaaaaaa</A>
    > <LI><A href="">aaaaaaaaa</A>
    > <LI><A href="">aaaaaaaaaaaaa
    aaaaaaaaa</A>
    > <LI><A href="">aaaaaa
    aa</A></LI>
    > </UL></DIV>
    >

  • Ipad background image size

    I would like to use a background image that I have in my Photos File on my iPad. I selected it and can not resize it to fit the screen. It is currently 216 x 540 @ 72 dpi; 61kb. Does it need to be smaller? I have the same image on my iPhone 5 and it fits the screen perfectly.

    Apparently you need to turn off reduce motion. I cant look at where that is exactly because I'm on my old iPad right now, but that will put back the move and scale

  • Background Image Size

    Hello! First time poster :)
    Is there any way to compress background images in Captivate
    3? I'm creating a tutorial on how to use the admin side of a
    website that will be uploaded for people to log in and view. When
    all is said and done, there will be about 300 slides and 45 minutes
    of audio broken up over those slides. I'm editing MP3s outside of
    the program to keep their size low, but the background screen shots
    are killing me. In order to fit the entire browser into the shot,
    the slides had to be 920 x 695 pixels and each shot is about 2.5MB,
    making my .cp file size a cumbersome 800+MB. I'm worried that the
    size of the published file is going to be too large for most people
    to view easily.
    I feel pretty comfortable with this program, but as a first
    time user, I'm worried that there are things I should be doing
    differently to avoid such large file sizes. Any suggestions on ways
    to decrease my file size?
    Thanks so much!

    Thanks for your quick reply! Having only used Captivate in
    tutorials, I wasn't sure what its capabilities were as far as how
    much you should put in one file. I have the slides divided into
    sections that I could easily save out as separate projects, but
    here is my concern. I need the tutorial to work as one cohesive
    piece. Ideally, the user needs to be able to watch it once all the
    way through, but have the option of skipping to various sections
    they'd like to view again. I was planning on doing this via a
    button appearing on each slide that would take them to a single
    slide that would navigate them to whatever section they needed. Is
    there any way to split up the files, yet still make a singular
    published file (or at least something functioning as like a
    singular published file)? What are your recommended limits for
    Captivate projects?
    Any suggestions are welcome as I'm running into a time
    crunch. Let me know if my explanation is at all unclear.
    THANKS!!

  • Menu background image size

    Hi...if I follow this link http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/6.0/en/17.html and the instructions for preparing menu background images. My images still get cropped. Does anyone know the real sizes that will fit perfectly?
    From the Apple link:
    "If you want your images to fit the DVD window exactly, use an image-editing application to crop and resize the images to the following dimensions:
    720 x 540 pixels for standard video in NTSC format
    854 x 480 pixels for widescreen in NTSC format
    768 x 576 pixels for standard video in PAL format
    1024 x 576 pixels for widescreen in PAL format"
    Many thanks in advance

    Shingy,
    Today there is an update to iDVD (as well as other iApps) that you should make.
    After doing the update this is what I found:
    I'm not sure if the things I'm seeing are a result of the update, but after updating I have further defined the problem.
    The problem now seems to be in figuring out the proper background size when using a widescreen theme converted to 4:3
    Widescreen as widescreen and 4:3 as 4:3 work as expected in PAL.
    So, if you stick with the originally discussed image sizes for PAL you will be OK AS LONG AS you don't try to use a widescreen theme as a 4:3 theme. (I didn't try using a 4:3 theme as widescreen.)

  • Background image size smaller but same quality?

    Hi guys,
    I just released www.cloudformz.com, It's an advanced formbuilder (Dutch) and the whole theme is that it's a cloud service.
    So,how surprising, I use a cloud background (1920 x 1080). My question is, how can I get the filesize smaller, but the same quality.
    I am aware of the quality slider when exporting for web, but that decreases the quality sow much that you see artifacts.
    Thanks in advance.
    online formulieren maken

    Internet users expecting to use "cloud" services would normally be fairly well connected to the Internet, no?
    Your background image, http://www.cloudformz.com/img/bg.jpg, is only 64 kbytes.  That's already almost inconsequentially small for an image that size...  It's a fairly highly compressed JPEG with no color profile info or metadata in it.  I don't think you're going to get it much smaller than that without seeing quality loss.
    However, one thing to try, with a large graphic containing open spaces and pure, solid colors, would be to save as a PNG, which can be very efficient for such files.  However, any noise or gradients in the image at all will cause a big increase in size.
    -Noel

  • I cannot reduce the images size on my ipad2 has anyone had this problem before ?

    I have been unable to reduce all images on my Ipad2 screen. Any suggestions ? I was in an app called Bamboo Paper and the size blew up.Nothing I do works.

    Double tap your screen with 3 fingers and the image should go back to normal size.  You may also go into your settings and see if zoom is turned on.  If it is turn zoom off.

  • PAL background image size requirement

    I'm trying to help Shingy who asked a question about a background image problem (see the message thread at http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=475370&tstart=0).
    Background images for NTSC projects (for at least the themes I've checked) seem to workout at the 'standard' image sizes: 720x540 pixel for standard and 854x480 pixels for widescreen.
    With PAL, using the PAL 'standard' image sizes: 768x576 pixel for standard and 1024x576 pixels for widescreen - results in images far larger than the background.
    Any suggestions to help Shingy?

    Fred,
    I don't know much about pic sizes, but maybe Karl's tables can help:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2090899&#2090899
    mish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Delete a file

    Hi Which API can I use to delete a file from a specific directory (folder)? Please advise Thanks alot

  • MacBook Pro - Set of issues

    They always come in a set of 3 for me. I'll put a little bit of history in for you to understand/follow. I had a MBP and sent it in 4 times for the same problem, then they finally replaced it. This replacement Mac was perfect till 6 months in. I expe

  • I'm getting error code -54 when trying to connect to iTunes store...

    Hello, I have been receiving the following message code all week when trying to connect to the store: "iTunes could not connect to the iTunes Store, An unknown error occurred (-54). Make sure your network connection is active and try again" My intern

  • Lightroom won't load catalog, application won't launch

    After using my Lightroom catalog and images on an external drive for several years, suddenly the application won''t load either today. Instead, I get this error message: "...Lightroom Catalogs can not be opened on network volumes, removable storage,

  • Seeking a better (more cost effective) family plan

    We currently have 5 lines on the Nationwide Talk & Text Share 700 (mins) plan, which costs $80/month, plus $10 (x 5) for each line. Three of the phones have a $30/month charge for (2gb each) data plan. So after taxes I am paying over $240/month for w