Reducing PS image size for Flash

Hi,
I am importing layers from my Photoshop file to Flash to create a Flash Banner ad using CS5.  My Banner size is set-up in PS as 160x600 72DPI. Are there any tricks to getting my file size down without losing anymore resolution when importing to the flash Stage? The images seem to be my biggest problem. I am converting the type to vector when importing into Flash and this helps.
THANKYOU

If you can create any of the graphics directly in Flash instead of importing them, that can help minimize file weight.  Otherwise, the weight of the images you import will be the weight of the images borne by the Flash file, so you should do what you can to optimize before importing.

Similar Messages

  • Lightroom 1.4.1:  Reducing File/Image Size for Web/E-Mail

    This should be a simple thing.
    I need to reduce my file size to upload it into various things on the web and e-mail and what not.  Sometimes it asks for a specific size.
    Right now, I'm using the Export function to do this, which means I have to reset the Image Settings each time in order to get to the size required.
    Isn't there and easier way to do this, like just type in the image size you want and have the program reset the image proportionately?
    Is there a ratio chart for this, like 1000 x 1400 = # of bytes?
    This is a function used all the time--I can't believe it's this cumbersome.

    Banktank wrote:
    (a)     How do I know I am selecting the correct pixel size for e-mail?  Just keep hunting and pecking until I find the right mix or is there a number combination that works consistently?  And if the latter is correct, what is that number combination.
    I just can't believe that reducing the MP size to get it in shape for an e-mail "thumbprint" photo is this tough.  Even with the 'preset', I'd have to set up a preset for every picture because they vary by MP and the scaling seems to change.
    There is no "standard" size for sending images via email. Just make it small. There is a save for email preset in recent releases of Lr. You can download the demo and see what that entails.
    You don't have to create a preset for each picture. I don't know what you would say that. Yes, the amount it compress varies with the information in the image, but this has always been the case with JPEGs. You don't have to make an image that is exactly some size. You just have to make it small enough for most MTAs and MUAs to handle. Since there is no real standard for this, just make it small enough for you.
    Something like 800px on the longest side, 70-80% quality should do it to find the JPEG compression sweet-spot.

  • Do I need to reduce the images size in pixels before upload them to M.Me?

    Do I need to reduce the images size in pixels (actual size jpeg 5616 × 3744 pixels/766kb) before upload them from iPhoto to a Mobile Me Gallery?
    Otherwise they will be heavy or the upload process take care of that?
    It would be nice that iPhoto took care and optimize the images to display online without any more work, because I´ve 1200 images to upload and they´re jpegs 5616 × 3744 pixels. It´s just to viewing purposes. Not o download or print.
    Thanks.

    In fact no matter if I use a High or Medium compression size JPEG, the size after upload is the same.
    Starts with 1,5 MB/5600px (high) or 780kb/5600px (medium) JPEG and ends after upload in 115kb for a 1024px image.
    This means that iPhoto auto compress in order to publish to Mobile Me, even if we start with a bigger file.
    I hope this info is useful to others.
    Thanks.

  • Reducing background image size

    Hi all,
    I'm working with Captivate 4 and have made a screencast of a particular process for training purposes.
    The project has 80 slides - but each background image is 1800+kb. Overall the project comes out at 3 MB even with the highest possible compression in the publishing settings.
    The project is to be hosted on the Web so I really don't need this kind of detail in the background images and I can't find anyway to reduce the image size apart from exporting each of the 80 backgrounds into Photoshop, reducing them in size and importing them back into Catptivate. For 80 slides this would take too long.
    So, two questions:
    How can the background image size be reduced within Captivate?
    How can I change the settings so when capturing screenshots the image sizes are smaller in the first place?
    Thanks in advance for any tips,
    Neil
    Is there anyway the

    Thanks Lilybiri
    I've bene recording at full screen (1024x768 or close enough) in order to get the largest recording space possible - and then resizing the project to 800x600 for the web production. The problem is that there is no optimise for web setting (or none that I can see). I just did another test and each background image is 3000kb - way over the top for something that will be viewed on the web.
    Does this help you get a fuller picture? Any advice?
    Thanks for sparing your time to answer here btw - much appreciated
    Neil

  • Email-to facilitate emailing a photo by gmail or AOL, I reduce the file size.  Is it better to reduce the image size or increase the jpg compression?

    To facilitate emailing a photo by gmail or AOL and avoid overwhelming the recipient's screen, I reduce the file size.  Is it better to reduce the image size or increase the jpg compression?  I have been making a duplicate image of 35 MB and reducing the image size to 8"x12" at 72 resolution giving a file size of 1.4 MB.  Then I SAVE AS a jpg of medium compression giving a  file size of about 111 KB.  Overkill?

    Go to File>save for web.
    I usually make the long side 800 px
    At the bottom of the dialog, check "constrain proportions."
    At the top, select JPEG in the dropdown for the file format.
    All the work is done for you! 72px/in is ok for web work. 240-300px/in is the recommended range for printing.

  • Recommended Image Size for Contact Pictures?

    Hi All,
    I want to edit up some family members to attach thier images to my iPhone contacts... Does anyone know what the preferred resolution size is for the iPhone for optimal appearance?
    I've tried to do this with outlook before, and I hate the way it dithers the images to a low quality.... I'm hoping that the iPhone doesn't do this and so I wanted to experiment with how they would appear...
    But instead of making the images just any random size, I wanted to crop them to the preferred image/pixel size so that my photoshopped images look like what I expect them to show up like...
    If you could advise with the documented or known pixel resolution size used by the iPhone it would be appreciated!

    Thanks, but I don't believe that the contacts come up full screen do they?
    Usually there is a optimal image size for certain things like contact photos and I am just trying to help ensure that all my photos are the same size and don't vary...
    I might be a little carried away with how I am formatting them, but just hoping someone already knows this answer!

  • Photo image size for letterpress card

    I'm trying to create a simple card in iPhoto 11 and am having some difficulties.
    The various card themes have several layout options. Each option requires a certain size image (or sizes - some layouts are for more than one image).
    How am I supposed to know what size of image will fit in each "layout box"?
    Am I supposed to just play with the size of the image by resizing a JPG until it fits? Too time consuming - I've tried and I just can't get it to fit. Obviously I missing something simple if this is to be an "easy way to quickly make a card". I cannot find the required image size for the various layouts anywhere, so I'm clearly missing something.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1035 tells me recommended resolutions, but they are too big to fit into a card.
    NOTE: I'm not talking about cropping an image or resizing it, which I can do. 
    I just need to know the size these card layouts require! Where is this information located, or what am I doing wrong?
    Am I confusing DPI and pixels and resolution and ....?
    Thanks in advance for any help!
    Best,
    Kurt

    I'm not clear on whatyou are not clear on
    You simply drag photos to the enpty photo frames in the template - there are move and pan controls if you want to change the position of the photo - you can reight click on a photo and select "fit to frame" in most themse if the photo ratios do not match teh frame ratios and yo are losing parts of the photo
    the only "resolution" concern you have is that the photos are at least 180 DPI and if they are not you will get a warning
    "Note: A yellow warning triangle with an exclamation point in the center may appear if the resolution is too low (below 180 DPI)."
    The article you referenced gives Minimum pixel sizes for various uses - if your photo are that size or larger you are fine
    The pixel size is shown in teh info window for a photo
    LN

  • Calculating image sizes for ibookstore submission

    I have the new ipad...so all my graphics look great, but I am having a hard time finding the exact method for determining image size for a book I am submitting to ibookstore. Can anyone point me to a way to calculate the best and largest images for ibooks

    For all those who are still confused by Apples image restrictions / requirements...
    In the new Template chooser after the recent updates is "Antique". This template has a Chapter background image ( the olde world print of sailing ships in blue litho print style ). This print when opened in PS is 2771 x 1506 @72ppi. 2771x1506=4,173,126 pixels.This implies  Apple supply a book which does not comply with its own requirements!
    Higher  image resolution applied to printed photo inmages, make the image sharper. If for example you wanted to print a wall poster 45inches  wide, the  image needs needs a higher resolution to cater for the size, BUT the same image used for a 45" poster will print 4.5" wide print on your own printer!
    iBA full page is deemed to be 1024 x 748. resolution from Apple is 72ppi. An image with those specifications will be OK in iPad & iPad 2 - but not so sharp on a Retina display especially if zoomed larger on screen
    Now it seems 2048 x 1496 - double the original image size is suggested for Retina.
    You  can change an image in PS i.e. 1024 x 748 and change resolution to 144. PS will double the pixel size as you change the resolution. OK, just change pixel sizes back to 1024 x 748 and reolution is now 144.
    That indicates a sharper image which will be suitable for retina display and in fact all current iPad models.
    Today my 11th photo book was notified as available  in the iBook Store, all my images were pre-formatted at 2048 x 1496 @ 150ppi.   ( 2048 x 1496 = 3.063,808 pixels!)
    During delivery there were no issues flagged and after delivery no tickets.
    So I suggest all those folk pondering images sizes follow my example, which  is now proved to be accepatble!
    One thing puzzles me though, I dont use all images as full page and  they can  be masked down to - say - 250 x 200.  Should  just  make an image to fit the size I  want to display ??

  • Reducing JPEG image size - jaggies in InDesign CC and Photoshop CC

    I have a high-res jpeg, 600ppi, 11 inches by 6.603 inches. The image is 4.21 MB, so there's plenty of data.
    I need to make it smaller to go into an InDesign document for print. I've been noticing this issue for awhile with CC. Recently I downsized a JPEG of line art in Photoshop for a poster, and it looked just awful.
    When I reduce the size to 300ppi, and 4" wide, bicubic sharper, I'm noticing that diagonals especially look really jaggy. The smaller I go, the worse the jaggies are. This is counterintuitive, because I'm reducing the size of the image.
    I have the Display Performance set to high-quality, with Allow Object-Level Display settings checked.
    When I place the CMYK reduced-size JPEG onto the page, the diagonals look jaggy. I thought it was a monitor issue, and that is contributing to it, but when I print out the page on my printer, the diagonals are still kind of jaggy. I tried placing a TIFF, and oh, my, that was twice as bad. I tried placing a PDF. Ugh.
    I've tried reducing the image to the exact size in Photoshop so I don't have to scale it in ID, then placing the image, and still jaggies.
    I've tried taking that image and dragging it from Bridge into the ID File. Still jaggies.
    I did print the image out directly from Photoshop at the smaller size, and it looks perfect.
    What could be happening? Is there a way to fix it? I'm working on a bunch of print work with some really nice photos in them (for a couple of real estate clients), and I'm afraid when the collateral gets printed, it's going to look like crap.

    Recently I downsized a JPEG of line art in Photoshop for a poster, and it looked just awful.
    When I reduce the size to 300ppi, and 4" wide,
    If it's really line art (no gray values) then 300ppi isn't enough. Line art needs to be closer to the output resolution (800-1200 ppi), and shouldn't be saved as JPEG.

  • Optimum Image Sizes for iWeb 08?

    I'm trying to find an optimum size for images for an online portfolio. . I have the photos in their native resolution, and I'm wondering what size should I downsize them to for the slideshow view. . . any and all suggestions are welcome and appreciated.

    It really depends on how many photos you want to load and what quality you need.
    You have to trade of these against the download speed of your webpage.
    The iWeb Photos or Albums pages are not the best way to present your work.
    Have a look at flash.....
    http://www.airtightinteractive.com/viewers/
    http://jalbum.net/

  • I need help reducing the image size...PSE8

    I have some photos that I won't be enlarging/editing (just want to keep them in catalog) that are large MB size files. I want to reduce the size of these photos and still see them large on the screen. Can anyone tell me what resolution I should enter to do that?
    For example what ratio would I enter for this photo:
    I have a photo that is 3.55 MB (JPG), PSE8 says my file is 55.556 inches x 41.667 inches at 72 dpi.
    When I open the resize Image option it says my pixel dimensions are 34.3M showing the width at 4000 and the Height at 3000
    This photo is one that I don't plan to edit - I just want to keep in my catalog at a smaller size for screen viewing. When I have tried to reduce the size it shows up small on the screen (at 100%).Or chosing smaller inches still keeps the file in large MB size.
    Why is it you can send an email in KB sizes that show up full screen but I can't get this reduced and it show up even be that big when it still says MB size?
    I hope this makes sense, I am new to PSE8 and not sure if I explained this well enough.
    I appreciate any help!,
    Thank you,
    Angela

    At the bottom of the screen, turn on Resample Image. Then enter a size in pixels for the longer of the two sides (figure this based on your monitor's pixel dimensions).
    I wouldn't do this to an original unless you have a copy elsewhere.

  • Best way to increase image size for print

    I have a jpeg of an image that I will have to increase roughly 140% for a final print size of 16"x20". I am creating the final design in InDesign, but am editing the image in Photoshop first. My question is what's the best way to increase the size of the jpeg first in Photoshop (I assume) so that when I bring it into InDesign it is maximized in terms of resolution but not so large that the file size prohibitive for sending.
    I've already cropped the image, but haven't adjusted any of the sizes. The dimensions are currently: 3233 pixels x 2586 pixels, and 10.777 in x 8.62 in at 300 pixels per inch.
    Do I bring it into InDesign this way or increase the document size first in Photoshop? I assume the latter.
    If I increase the size in Photoshop, I assume I should resample the image. If I do, that increases the pixel dimensions and file size to over 82.4M. Is there a way to keep the 300 ppi resolution while reducing the file size?

    Photoshop CC now has Preserve Details as well as Bicubic smoother for enlargements.
    140% is not asking much for enlargements. Photoshop may suffice.
    You mention 300 ppi. Is it  really necessary? In the days of offset presses,that was the standard, but what is it for a photo inkjet or the printer you use? You may not need 300.
    Personally when I enlarge, I like Photozoom Pro. I have it on my Mac and PC and find it better than stock enlargement in Photoshop. Of course it's $99-$199 depending if it's on sale.
    Here's a bit more about digital enlargement in this Sydney Morning Herald article
    http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/cameras/how-to-enlarge-images-without-pixelation-201306 26-2ovts.html
    Of course Photoshop is for preparing photos for print and the web, so you would want to finish your photos there before moving them to InDesign.
    Trevor Dennis, Noel Carboni and many other professionals can give better answers on the subject of enlargement and printing so I hope they will post advice as well.
    I can't answer the last one honestly, I've never prepared prints for room exhibit, so I can't say what works best.
    Good luck. I hope you can get it sorted out.
    Gene

  • Skinning and Image size for android devices

    I am building a mobile application for both Android and iOS devices. I am using images in 3 different resolutions sets.
    The images have been made in such a way that the complete all screens were first designed for 640x960 resolution with 320 dpi. Then I created 3 different sets of images where the images were reduced to 75% and 50% of the 640x960 image size. The images I have now work fine for iPhone 3GS and iPhone 4 and 4S devices. But the 75% one's don't work correctly. This is because the size of say background of view at 75% would be 720 pixels while the size of the Android device's screen is 854px or 800px.
    How can I address this issue?

    Any help on this?

  • Reducing MP4 File Size for online upload

    I have a short HD video almost 1 GB in size (impossible to upload online). Is there an easy way to reduce the file size using IMovie or another program that I don't have to go out and buy?

    I don't think you'll have too much success with this. Mpegs are already compressed files, so there's no real benefit to trying for further reduction. In some cases using compression software will make the resulting file larger than the original.
    There are utilities that can be used to slice up a file into smaller parts that can then be reassembled. For example, Movie Cutter, SplitFuse, Split&Concat, MacAppStuff Pieces are a few. Look for them at VersionTracker or MacUpdate. Stuffit Deluxe is a commercial product that includes the ability to split and join multiple pieces of a file archive and has the benefit of being available on both Macs and PCs.
    You can then split a large file into several smaller files to send via email or to upload to file server sites. Of course the recipient will need a compatible utility to join the pieces.

  • How to set image size for importing photos from a digital camera

    I'm using Iphoto 6 and am a novice user of my new digital camera. The camera is set to HQ image quality. Initially when I imported photos from the camera into IPhoto, the images were very large (over 1 meg) and produced good quality 4X6 prints. Now when I import photos from the same camera still set to HQ image quality, the photos are very small (less than 100 kb) after being imported into IPhoto. I think I must have changed some kind of setting in IPhoto that affects the size of an imported image, but I can't find where that is or how to change it back so that the size is not changed when imported. Can someone please help me with this? Thanks!
    IMAC G5   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   my other computer is a Dell Dimension L500CX running Windows XP Pro

    Dave, thanks for clarifying Toad's response for me - I was just too ignorant to connect the dots from his responses. As you said, there were 2 versions - 1 in the original folder and 1 in data; the original folder had the photos that were 1 mb. We must have pulled from that folder previously to print photos not realizing they existed in 2 places. So when we found these thumbnail photos, we just thought they were the real thing. Where can you go to learn about the struction and hierarchy of the photos in terms of what Iphoto does to an image when you import it? Is it in Iphoto help somewhere? Thanks so much for your help with this, and you too Toad for leading me down the path.
    If you're getting the size from Finder, I think Old
    Toad's question makes a lot of sense. Is the file
    you're looking at, somewhere in a folder called
    "Data" in iPhoto Library? That 56k sounds about the
    right size for a thumbnail.
    If you do a search for the image name, both the
    actual photo and the small thumbnail are stored with
    the same image, e.g. abc.jpg
    IMAC G5   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   my other computer is a Dell Dimension L500CX running Windows XP Pro

Maybe you are looking for

  • I tried to empty the trash, full of back up file from my hard disk and it just says: "The operation can't be completed because an unexpected error occurred (error code -8003)"

    I have an external hard disk of 319.73 GB that I use as back up memory and where I put all the movies and other files that I can't leave on the computer as they occupy too much memory space . One day I was deleting all the previous dated back up to h

  • C++ coding (void) how to use it in Xcode .

    hi . im not a developer. i just a student. im trying to compile my coding in c++ via Xcode in my #MAC . but my coding got stucked . this :: >>      void setData(int value); BubbleSort (dataType[], int listSize) the error appear [Expected '.' after to

  • JSF & JavaScript

    Hello In some .jspx source i have: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='windows-1251'?> <jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.0" xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html" xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"> <jsp:output omit-xml-decl

  • All Adobe Products Render Crash!

    I have a problem with Adobe Media Encoder, After Effects, and Premiere Pro (All CS6) when rendering. I get around the halfway mark on any length of video (From 2 to 20 minutes I have tried) and it will crash, and present me with this error The detail

  • Extended size options on Export

    The current Export dialog allows one to constrain dimensions for the output files. It appears to treat the constraints as a request to downsize, if larger (which is fine), or upsize if smaller (which is not for me the desired behavior). I am not sure