Reducing time for rebooting

Hi experts,
iam using the torch 9860 handset,it taking long time for rebooting please help me in reducing the time.
It's almost 3 to 5 mins to reboot.
Thanks &. Regards,
Karthik.m

use latest OS and dont keep tons of stuff on media card
or do like i do and Reboot it prior to going to bed and it should be fine when you wake up
Click here to Backup the data on your BlackBerry Device! It's important, and FREE!
Click "Accept as Solution" if your problem is solved. To give thanks, click thumbs up
Click to search the Knowledge Base at BTSC and click to Read The Fabulous Manuals
BESAdmin's, please make a signature with your BES environment info.
SIM Free BlackBerry Unlocking FAQ
Follow me on Twitter @knottyrope
Want to thank me? Buy my KnottyRope App here
BES 12 and BES 5.0.4 with Exchange 2010 and SQL 2012 Hyper V

Similar Messages

Reduce Time for Rman Backup

Dear Experts;
rman for 0 level backup is taking about 5:26 hours, backup size is now 312gb I have enabled block track checking & it reduces time for incremental level 1 from 2hour to almost 3 minutes.
database shows biggest tablespace is "users"
I want valuable suggestions for reducing its time or is there any way to break 0 level backup. I can allocate channels but ultimately it will take time when taking "users" tablepace backup
Right now I am taking backup at usb drive & its version is 2.0
Regards

As you are taking backup to a usb drive there is not much that can be done to improve the speed. If you are concerned about the backup being slow.. then you could think of taking the backup on local disk( which would be faster and more efficient) and then move the backups from the disk to usb drive.
This can be done in a single backup script as 2 part operation.
1) take backup to disk.
2) copy the backup to usb drive and delete the backups from the disk.
There are many additional features that u can add to enhance it thoe.
Regards,
V

Steps to reducing time for loading of data

Hi
Could any one tell me how to reduce the time for loading of records into a particular cube or Ods. For ex: iam loading some 1 lac records.It was taking for me some 5 hrs. I want to reduce the time to 3hrs or 4hrs.What are the very first steps to be considered to make fast.
Regards
Ajay

Hi Ajay,
Check the following.
1> Any routine you have in transfer rule and update rule should not fire database select more then one time in the same code.
2> Load Master data before transaction data.
3> Reduce the data pack size in infopackage.
4> Delete old PSA because you may space issue while data loading .
5> If you are loading in ODS then remove Bex check in ODS maintenance screen if you are not doing report on that ODS.
hope this will help you.
Suneel

How to reduce time for gather statistics for a table.

I have a table size 520 gb
Its one of the partition size is 38 gb
and total indexes of related table is 412 gb.
Server/instance details.
==========
56 cpu -> Hyper threading enable
280 gb ram
35 gb sga
27 gb buffer cache
4.5 gb shared pool size
25 gb pga
undo size 90gb
temp size 150 gb
Details :
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('OWNER','TAB_NAME',PARTNAME=>'PART_NAME',CASCADE=>FALSE,ESTIMATE_PERCENT=>10,DEGREE=>30,NO_INVALIDATE=>TRUE);
when i am firing this in an ideal time when there is no load that time also is is taking 28 mins to complete.
Can anybody please reply me how can we reduce the stats gather time.
Thanks in advance,
Tapas Karmakar
Oracle DBA.

Enable tracing to see where the time is going.
parallel 30 seems optimistic - unless you have a large number of discs to support the I/O ?
you haven't limited histogram collection, and most of the time spent of histograms may be wasted time - what histograms do you really need, and how many does Oracle analyse for and then discard ?
Using a block sample may help slightly
You haven't limited the granularity of the stats collection to the partition - the default is partition plus table, so I think you're also doing a massive sample on the table after completing the partition. Is this what you want to do, or do you have an alternative strategy for generating table-level stats.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

How to reduce time for replicating large tables?

Hi
Any suggestions on how to reduce the amount of time it takes to replicate a large table when it is first created?
I have a table with 150 million rows in it, and it takes forever to start the replication process even if I run it in parallel, and I cant afford the downtime.

What downtime are you referring to? The primary doesn't need to be down when you're setting up replication and you're presumably still in the process of doing the initial configuration on the replicated database, so it's not really down, it's just not up yet.
Justin

Reduce time

Hi
I have records more than one one Lakh in my table.
1) i have created index for a primary key column.
2) i have used analytical functions in where condition.
so now i want to reduce time for that query .. is there any way to reduce time ...???

BluShadow wrote:
Or use a laptop and sit on a fast plane or train. The faster it goes to slower time goes. ;)You don't even need to do that!
A lesser known consequence of general relativity is that time will move slower in a stronger gravitational field. On Earth, one implication of this is that a clock on the second floor of an office building will move faster than one on the first floor. Using the ultra-precise clock setup, the NIST researchers tested this as well. One of the optical clocks was placed about a foot above the other and measurements were taken. They found a fractional frequency change of (4.1±1.6)x10-17; plugging this number back into relativity's formulas produced an equivalent height differential gave 14.5±5.9 inches, a result that nicely bracketed the 12 inch difference in the experimental setup.http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/09/einsteins-relativity-measured-in-newtons-domain.ars

Logic asks for my serial number every time I reboot the computer. Anyone know what gives? I restored the program after a hard drive crash and now I need to enter the serial number every time. Why doesn't it remember the code?

After a computer crash I had to reinstall the whole system using Migration Assistant. The User ID is NOT the same as the original computer. And now every time I reboot the computer and load Logic the program asks me to enter my Serial Number with a "Licensing" window. Why can't the copy protection see that I have already done this? Am I missing some Pref file, or is it in the wrong location? The program works fine once I enter in the number and insert my Logic XSKey (from an older update). Thanks.

Hi!
Do you run automap 4.8/4.9? If so, then the chance is that automap is the culprit for slow undos/redos on LPX 10.1. Delete the Novation controller in the LPX controller surfaces. You find it under preferences/controller surfaces. If that is the solution for you, then uninstall automap. You find the uninstaller under applications-automap.
Good luck!

My Macbook Pro *****! I have had it for 2 weeks now, got it brand new at the apple store, it freezes all the time, and reboots itself, sometimes when i start it, purple dots cover the screen and i have to hold the power button.

I have had it for 2 weeks now, got it brand new at the apple store, it freezes all the time, and reboots itself, sometimes when i start it, purple dots cover the screen and i have to hold the power button. a 2 week old computer is not supposed to do this! it wastes all its time being so flashy that it just craps out all the time. sometimes i feel like i should have stayed with my virus covered PC. at least when it shut down randomly you could turn it back on, but with the macbook pro, it just keeps restarting itself over and over. need help with this, any answers?

Here's a novel thought. Take it back to the vendor. Should have done that one week ago.

Reduce/Eliminate the start up time for a batch job

I'm looking for ideas on how I might be able to modify either my jobs, workflow or data flow in an effort to reduce the "start up" time that I'm encountering.
Currently I have a batch job we execute several hundred times a day. One of the parameters we pass to this job is a file path. The data flow reads a flat text file in this file path, processes the data through several transforms, and writes a flat text file back into the file path.
The actual processing time varies with the number of records being processed -- as one would expect.
However, even for the smallest - single record - input file the job takes between 40 and 50 seconds to complete. If I watch the trace file during this time it appears that 95% of this time is spent getting ready to run the job. The actual processing is almost instantaneous.
Is there anything that I can look at changing in order to improve the overall performance of these jobs?
I should mention that I am aware of setting up real time jobs, and how they would not require this "start up" time for each job submitted. However this jobs we process could between 1 to 1,000,000 records. Passing that many records in a single web service call does not seem reasonable. I would deal with issue on the submission side and then the potential timeout issue when waiting on the response -- which could also be quite large.

Thanks Michael --
I must admit I'm a bit lost when it comes to the issue of codepages.
Is there any documentation you could refer me to with regard to setting the correct codepage for the data sources and targets?
Also, from the trace log I see the following statement:
Changed engine runtime locale <eng_us.cp1252> to <Unicode (UTF-16)> because data flow <DF_Suppression> contains a transform that requires processing with the Unicode (UTF-16) code page.
Other than the data source and data targets I do not see any option to set, or change, the codepage within any of transforms that I am using. (URAC, Name Cleanse, Query, Case, Match transforms are used)
Right now my source and targets are set to "default", which would seem to need to be changed. Where is the "default" set?
Sorry for so many questions about this.

How to reduce the time for each clips up to 0,04 seconds?

Hi, I'm trying to realize my first time laps. I've need to reduce the time for each clips up to 0,04 seconds, but it seems that the minimum time is 0,1 second. There's a solution?

And use a zip file. Many people can't open RARs.
There are only two ways to tell somebody thanks: Kudos and Marked Solutions
Unofficial Forum Rules and Guidelines

Reducing time required for ABAP-only copyback (system copy) process

Our company is investigating how to reduce the amount of time it takes to perform a copyback (system copy) from a production ABAP system to a QA system. We use a similar process for all ABAP-only systems in our landscape, ranging from 3.1h systems to ECC6.0 ABAP-only systems on both DB2 and Oracle database platforms, and the process takes approximately two weeks of effort from end-to-end (this includes time required to resolve any issues encountered).
Here is an overview of the process we use:
u2022     Create and release backup transports of key system tables and IDu2019s (via client copy) in the QA system to be overwritten (including RFC-related tables, partner profile and IDOC setup-related tables, scheduled background jobs, archiving configuration, etc.).
u2022     Reconfigure the landscape transport route to remove QA system from transport landscape.
u2022                    Create a virtual import queue attached to the development system to capture all transports released from development during the QA downtime.
u2022     Take a backup of the target production database.
u2022     Overwrite the QA destination database with the production copy.
u2022     Localize the database (performed by DBAu2019s).
u2022     Overview of Basis tasks (for smaller systems, this process can be completed in one or two days, but for larger systems, this process takes closer to 5 days because of the BDLS runtime and the time it takes to import larger transport requests and the user ID client copy transports):
o     Import the SAP license.
o     Execute SICK to check the system.
o     Execute BDLS to localize the system.
o     Clear out performance statistics and scheduled background jobs.
o     Import the backup transports.
o     Import the QA client copy of user IDu2019s.
o     Import/reschedule background jobs.
o     Perform any system-specific localization (example: for a CRM system with TREX, delete the old indexes).
u2022     Restore the previous transport route to include the QA system back into the landscape.
u2022     Import all transports released from the development system during the QA system downtime.
Our companyu2019s procedure is similar to the procedure demonstrated in this 2010 TechEd session:
http://www.sapteched.com/10/usa/edu_sessions/session.htm?id=825
Does anyone have experience with a more efficient process that minimizes the downtime of the QA system?
Also, has anyone had a positive experience with the system copy automation tools offered by various companies (e.g., UC4, Tidal)?
Thank you,
Matt

Hi,
> One system that immediately comes to mind has a database size of 2TB. While we have reduced the copyback time for this system by running multiple BDLS sessions in parallel, that process still takes a long time to complete. Also, for the same system, importing the client copy transports of user ID's takes about 8 hours (one full workday) to complete.
>
For BDLS run, I agree with Olivier.
> The 2 weeks time also factors in time to resolve any issues that are encountered, such as issues with the database restore/localization process or issues resulting from human error. An example of human error could be forgetting to request temporary ID's to be created in the production system for use in the QA system after it has been initially restored (our standard production Basis role does not contain all authorizations required for the QA localization effort).
>
For the issues that you encounter because of system copy, you can minimize this time period as you would be doing it on periodic basis (making some task list) and you can make a note of issues that you faced in previous run. So, normally i don't count it as system copy time
Thanks
Sunny

Can I reduce the execution time for a step in a TestStand ?

Hi,
I calculated the a single step execution time for TestStand Ver 2.0. It comes to around 20 milliseconds/step. Can I reduce this excution time ?
Are there any settings available for configuring execution time parameters except result logging and exception handlings to reduce the execution time ?

It's difficult to tell how you what time you are reporting for your step. Clearly we don't have control of the time it takes your code to execute. However, we are constantly working on reducing the overhead of calling the code. In addition, you don't mention the type of step you are calling. One way to have a common reference is to use the example \Examples\Benchmarks\Benchmarks.seq. Below have have posted the results of running this sequence with both tracing and result collection enabled and then disabled. I have a 700 MHz, 128 MB RAM, Dell PIII laptop. In this example there is no code within the code modules. You notice that calling a DLL has the least overhead with a minimum of 7.459 ms with tracing and results enabled and 0.092 ms with tracing and results disabled. Although not included below, if I enable results be disable tracing I get a minimum time of 0.201 ms, a 100x improvement on your time.
With Results and Tracing enabled.
7.578 milliseconds per step for CVI Standard Prototype - Object File
7.579 milliseconds per step for CVI Standard Prototype - DLL
7.459 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype
8.589 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit
9.563 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit with Precondition
10.015 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit with Precondition and 4 Parameters
7.868 milliseconds per step for ActiveX Automation
8.892 milliseconds per step for LabVIEW Standard Prototype
With tracing and results disabled.
0.180 milliseconds per step for CVI Standard Prototype - Object File
0.182 milliseconds per step for CVI Standard Prototype - DLL
0.092 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype
0.178 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit
0.277 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit with Precondition
0.400 milliseconds per step for DLL Flexible Prototype Numeric Limit with Precondition and 4 Parameters
0.270 milliseconds per step for ActiveX Automation
1.235 milliseconds per step for LabVIEW Standard Prototype

How to reduce download time for intial swf?

How to reduce download time for intial swf?
There are a number of RPC calls but most of the data is cached at server end but still swf takes a lot of time to download completely.
What all are the ways by which i can reuce the inital load time of my application?

Reduce the size of the SWF by moving code and assets not needed for the
first screen out into modules.

Upgraded to 7.o.1(x86en-us) will not load asks for reboot i have rebooted over 10 times still will not load same message tryed to reinstall still asking for reboot still does not load

Question
upgraded to 7.o.1(x86en-us) will not load asks for reboot i have rebooted over 10 times still will not load same message tried to reinstall still asking for reboot still does not load
what can i do cannot uninstall either
thank you

Question
upgraded to 7.o.1(x86en-us) will not load asks for reboot i have rebooted over 10 times still will not load same message tried to reinstall still asking for reboot still does not load
what can i do cannot uninstall either
thank you

Best practices to reduce downtime for Database releases(rolling changes)

Hi,
What are best practices to reduce downtime for database releases on 10.2.0.3? What DB changes can be rolling and what can't?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
RJiv.

I would be very dubious about any sort of universal "best practices" here. Realistically, your practices need to be tailored to the application and the environment.
You can invest a lot of time, energy, and resources into minimizing downtime if that is the only goal. But you'll generally pay for that goal in terms of developer and admin time and effort, environmental complexity, etc. And you generally need to architect your application with rolling upgrades in mind, which necessitates potentially large amounts of redesign to existing applications. It may be perfectly acceptable to go full-bore into minimizing downtime if you are running Amazon.com and any downtime is unacceptable. Most organizations, however, need to balance downtime against other needs.
For example, you could radically minimize downtime by having a second active database, configuring Streams to replicate changes between the two master databases, and configure the middle tier environment so that you can point different middle tier servers against one or the other database. When you want to upgrade, you point all the middle tier servers against database A other than 1 that lives on a special URL. You upgrade database B (making sure to deal with the Streams replication environment properly depending on requirements) and do the smoke test against the special URL. When you determine that everything works, you configure all the app servers to point at B and have Streams replication process configured to replicate changes from the old data model to the new data model), upgrade B, repeat the smoke test, and then return the middle tier environment to the normal state of balancing between databases.
This lets you upgrade with 0 downtime. But you've got to license another primary database. And configure Streams. And write the replication code to propagate the changes on B during the time you're smoke testing A. And you need the middle tier infrastructure in place. And you're obviously going to be involving more admins than you would for a simpler deploy where you take things down, reboot, and bring things up. The test plan becomes more complicated as well since you need to practice this sort of thing in lower environments.
Justin

Reducing time for rebooting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for