Redundant power with UC560-T1E1-K9

Good morning,
Is there any way of having redundant power with UC560-T1E1-K9 (redundant internal power, RPS, UPS, etc..)?
Thank you very much
Best Regards
João Mendes

Hello,
In order to use Meet-Me conferencing, you have two options.
1. Conferences have to be "initiated" by an internal phone.
a) To initiate conference, pickup an internal phone handset, hit "more" button on phone menu, hit "MeetMe" option. Then dial meet-me extension (770). Now that the conference has been initiated, other phones can just dial the 770 extension to join the conference.
2. Select "Enable Meet-me Unlocked" on the CCA page for the conference configuration.
a) To initiate a conference, just dial the conference extension (770). Users can join by dialing 770 also.
Thank you,
Darren

Similar Messages

UC560 T1E1 with Direct TCP SIP

Hi,
Firstly I am new to cisco's voice setup, and have a UC560-T1E1-K9 which I need to configure as just a basic gateway. Essentially i want to setup trunk-to-trunk between ISDN PRI and TCP SIP but do not have the first idea where to start.
The main aim is to receive calls over ISDN PRI (E1 NET5) and pass the call stright through to a direct tcp sip trunk (incoming only).
Then configure FXS for a few numbers for two way calling.
Hope someone can give me a couple of pointers as the CUE is not very helpful
Thanks,
Alex.

Hi,
You have two approaches.
Option A
Use CCA to configure the unit from scratch. Configure the unit for your ISDN connection and test using the fxs ports. Manually configure a SIP dial-peer to route inbound PSTN calls to your Lync server. You'll need to tweak the configuration at various places to make it work. You therefore need to be pretty confident in understanding all the work CCA has done for you. The benefit this, is you have a local outbound dial-plan pre-configured on the unit.
Option B
Configure the unit yourself from scratch. Rough outline:
1. Configure E1 controller for voice
2. Setup the DSP modules for your region
3. configure a pots inbound dial peer to accept calls from the PSTN
4. configure an outbound SIP dial-peer to send the calls to Lync.
Lync expects calls to be prefixed with a + & E.164 and bare in mind the telco may only send you the last 6 sigits of the called number
Here's an example for UK ISDN with 30 timeslots: note module slots will be incorrect in this code, example is generic IOS and not specific to UC560.
1. Configure E1 controller for voice
card type e1 0
network-clock-participate wic 0 ! something like this, you may need to work out which slot you have
network-clock-participate slot 1 ! or something like this
network-clock-select 5 E1 1/0 ! you get the idea....
controller E1 1/0
pri-group timeslots 1-31
interface Serial1/0:15 ! do a show run to check the right interface slot number
description "use dial-peer voice 10 to reach me for outbound"
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-net5
isdn timer T309 400000
isdn incoming-voice modem
isdn T309-enable
isdn send-alerting
isdn sending-complete
no cdp enable
Your E1 card should now be up
c2821.1.hex#show controllers e1
E1 1/0 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
Cablelength is Unknown
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Version info Firmware: 20090408, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line.
CRC Threshold is 320. Reported from firmware is 320.
Data in current interval (652 seconds elapsed):
     0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
     0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
     0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Total Data (last 24 hours)
     0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations,
     0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,
     0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
2. Setup the DSP modules for your region
voice-port 1/0:15
cptone GB
bearer-cap Speech
3. configure a pots inbound dial peer to accept calls from the PSTN
I suggest at this point, you debug isdn q931 and dial in. See how many digits the telco sends you.
Configure a number translation to put this number in to E.164
In my example we take the 6 digits the telco sends us and prepend 441234
voice translation-rule 10
rule 1 /^$.+$$/ /441234\1/
voice translation-profile incomingisdn
translate called 10
in exec mode:
SOV_TAG1#test voice translation-rule 10 567890
Matched with rule 1
Original number: 567890 Translated number: 441234567890
Original number type: none      Translated number type: none
Original number plan: none      Translated number plan: none
dial-peer voice 1000 pots
description Inbound POTS dial-peer
translation-profile incoming incomingisdn
incoming called-number .+
direct-inward-dial
port 1/0:15
4. configure an outbound SIP dial-peer to send the calls to Lync. Lync expects calls to be prefixed with a + & E.164 so we're going to add a plus
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711alaw
codec preference 2 g711ulaw
codec preference 3 g729r8
codec preference 4 g729br8
voice translation-rule 20
rule 1 /$.+$/ /+\1/
voice translation-profile addaplus
translate called 20
in exec mode
#test voice translation-rule 20 123
Matched with rule 1
Original number: 123    Translated number: +123
dial-peer voice 1010 voip
description SIP Trunk to Lync
translation-profile outgoing addaplus
preference 5
destination-pattern ^441234.+ ! note this is the area code we added to make the number into E164
voice-class codec 1
voice-class sip outbound-proxy ipv4:192.168.10.10 ! ip address of lync
session target dns:lync.mydomain.net ! your lync realm
session protocol sipv2
session transport tcp
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
no vad
and that's about it apart from getting the fx0 ports sorted - one step at a time.
For outbound you added an incoming SIP dial-peer and an outgoing pots dial peer.
Adam
VoIP.co.uk

Does "dual power supply" mean "redundant power supply"?

Does Cisco7301 "dual power supply" mean "redundant power supply"?
If unplug one power socket, 7301 continues operating?

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
On a 7301, I believe it does act as a redundant power supply, and this is often true for many Cisco devices with dual power supplies, but there can be exceptions. For example, on the 6500 chassis, you might use dual power supplies in combined mode, i.e. failure of a power supply would leave the chassis short of necessary power. The 3560X/3750X might also have insufficient power if a power supply fails when running on two (this issue may arise when using PoE).

Catalyst 2960G redundant power options

I am trying to come up with the best redundant power option for the Catalyst 2960G switch series. Taking the WS-C2960G-48TC-L for example, there is a RPS option (the RPS 2300) and a single internal power supply. The suggested configuration from Cisco is to use the internal power supply along with the RPS module as a backup. However, in this configuration, if the switch fails over to the RPS for any reason, the switch will need to reboot in order to switch back to its internal power supply.
In older switch series, such as the Catalyst 2924XL, we got around this limitation by powering the switches exclusively from the RPS unit, which had dual power supplies and could power all of its connected switches at once. This provided AC power supply and power feed redundancy, and no reboots were needed if a feed failed.
Is this approach still suggested with the RPS 2300? These units can only power two devices concurrently, so we'd need one RPS per two switches. That's acceptable to us, but will we be getting SNMP traps and other errors if we run the switches with their internal power supply disconnected and use the RPS for primary power?

at this point it sounds like your redundant power is not operational and no longer redundant.
you should verify the RPS is connected completely, securely and correctly to the 3458 as well as the power outlet.
if all is correct, double check the RPS to verify it is running and the fan is running. if either of these two are not operational, you should probably consider replacing it asap by contacting TAC from http://www.cisco.com/tac or 800.553.2447 (if the product is under warranty)
or if it is not under warranty, then your cisco reseller should be able to help you as well.

Redundant Power System 2300

I have to set up Redundant Power System 2300 & have the following devices.
Cisco 3550, PIX 515E & 2811 routers

Please provide me any suggestions also let me know how many connection the devi
ce can support i have two power supplies connected with it .

Monitoring 3750x and 3560x Redundant Power Supply and Fans

I need help for monitoring the redundant power supply of my switches (3750x and 3560x)
I have configured my snmp on my switches and is able to monitor interfaces, temperature and etc.
The problem is when I am monitoring the redundant power supply and fans.
I am using two Cisco C3KX-PWR-350WAC Modular Power Supply per switch.
The OID I use to monitor the PSU are the following:
Power Supply 1
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.5.1.3 Instance: 1003
Power Supply 2
.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.5.1.3 Instance: 1004
When I do an SNMP walk, the value is showing (1) which means normal.
When I simulate a power outage on power supply 1 or 2 by unplugging the power source, the value doesn't change and is still (1).
Values: normal(1), warning(2), critical(3), shutdown(4), notPresent(5)
As for the Fans:
When I remove the fan module, I am able to get a notification that the fans are down, but when I plug back the fan module it is now using a different instance.
Below is my config for SNMP:
snmp-server community XXXXXXXXXXXXXX RO
snmp-server location XXXXXX
snmp-server contact XXXXXX
snmp-server chassis-id Cisco3560X
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps transceiver all
snmp-server enable traps tty
snmp-server enable traps license
snmp-server enable traps cpu threshold
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps vlancreate
snmp-server enable traps vlandelete
snmp-server enable traps port-security
snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature status
snmp-server enable traps errdisable
snmp-server enable traps vlan-membership
snmp-server host X.X.X.X version 2c XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Note: This problem is the same for all of my 3560X switches and 3750X switches. I am not sure if I am monitoring the wrong OID.
Thanks in advance

Hi ,
You are running an old IOS code , definitely you are hitting a BUG .
there is no workaround or I would say unfirtunetely you will not be able to get the correct power supply status via SNMP.
you need to use command line for this.
I mean "show env all "
**** if you want to know the Excat BUG that your code is hitting ,please contact TAC.
Thanks-
Afroz
**Ratings Encourages Contributors ****

How do you manage power with Openbox on laptop?

What do you use to check the battery power with Openbox. On other distros, there is generally a popup when the battery has reached a low level.
I would like to know how other people manage it. Do you try to reproduce other distro's behavior?
Last edited by Gradient (2013-05-19 22:58:15)

For the extra lazy you could always just use xfce4-power-manager and some kind of taskbar with a tray. Though I think this kind of goes against the whole idea of setting things up in manually in a customized way.
I use i3, and the default i3status (the program that feeds info the i3bar) has an option for battery levels. I made it so that it turns blood red when I get to a certain percentage. In terms of a total WM agnostic solution, you could always just have a cronjob run a script that checks the level, then throws up an xdialog box telling you about low battery levels, and then even have it shutdown/hibernate/suspend at a certain level.

%PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode

Hi All,
We are getting the below error on our Cisco 3560 Switch and the device is running on the image ":c3560-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE4.bin".
010790: Mar 2 00:19:35 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010791: Mar 2 00:24:35 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010792: Mar 2 00:29:35 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010793: Mar 2 00:34:35 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010794: Mar 2 00:39:36 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010795: Mar 2 00:44:36 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010796: Mar 2 00:49:37 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
010797: Mar 2 00:54:37 PDT: %PLATFORM_ENV-1-PWR_RPS: Redundant power supply faulty or in standby mode
DCSW#sh env all
FAN is OK
TEMPERATURE is OK
SW PID Serial# Status Sys Pwr PoE Pwr Watts
1 Built-in Good
SW Status RPS Name RPS Serial# RPS Port#
1 Standby <>
Kindly help me on how to fix this issue and what to do next?

Hi Senthil,
What are the LED status on RPS. It looks like RPS may have gone faulty. How many switches are connected to it? Possibly a reset of RPS could fix this issue, else replace it.
Thanks,
M

N7k as redundant core with vpc to 4510/3750 as distribution switch

Hi - basic question here
Got 2 qty N7k as redundant core with vpc to 4510 and 3750 as redundand distribution switch running MST. I got stuck with some bad cabling design from our IDF to Datacenter so have 2 access switch whereby each one will have a etherchannel to both distribution 4510 and 3750. My question is this is a doable design as I am not sure about the vpc upstream on how it effects etherchannel with MST for my distribution and access.
Thanks

vPC will be considered as one logical link by both upstream and downstream connected devices
the question here are you going to run L3 between the distribution and Core devices ? ( this is recommended design ) if yes, then you do not need to worry about MST and VPC if you going to have it L3 from distribution devices up to the Core
one thing to consider is the distribution switch in your design has big difference in terms of backplane throughput i mean between the 4500 and 3750 !
if you can have both as 4500 will be better and more consistent design
Good luck
if helpful Rate

How do u close the apps when done with them to save power with iOS 7

How do u close the apps when done with them to save power with iOS 7

To close out apps, simply double click the home button and instead of holding down the app icons and clicking on the X mark in older versions, you have to swipe the app window up and away.
Also you can save on battery by turning of background app refresh from settings .... See this article for details , http://nyacomputing.com/how-to-close-out-background-apps-in-ios-7-and-save-on-ba ttery/

Redundant installation with 4200 sensors

Hi
We are in a process of starting to work on a design with several IPS 4270. The demand is to make the design redundant and with high availability.
As I am aware of there no redundant support (e.g. no protocol support like HSRP) within the IPS itself but several ways to make a redundant installation. I'm looking for white papers, case studies or design suggestions involving a redundant installation. Could you please guide me where to find such information?
Thanks
Johan Kellerman

Hi,
See the following white paper:
"IPS Deployments in Enterprise Data Centers"
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps5729/ps5713/ps4077/prod_white_paper0900aecd806e724b.html
Regards,

Replacement product for redundant power supply RPS1000

Hi,
i would like to know what's the replacement product for RPS1000, i tried in cisco web page but no results.
Please help me.
Thanks

Hello,
Unfortunately there is no replacement product for the redundant power supply RPS1000.
Regards,
Cindy Toy
Cisco Small Business
Community Manager

3845 Router redundant power supply question

Is it possible to swap out a bad redundant power supply on a 3845 router without powering down the router?

The FAQ at this URL indicates that they ARE in fact hot-swappable. Please review it here, under "System Power (AC/DC)".

Adding Redundant Power Supply

Hi,
I was wondering if I am able to add a redundant power supply to an asr 1001 router that is in production without losing connectivity or causing any diruption to the Users - is it hotswappable?
Thank you, Pat.

Hi Pat,
Yes, the power supplies are indeed hot swappable. Check out the quote from the following link :
"All system components are hot-swappable. They are designed to be removed and replaced while the
system is operating without presenting an electrical hazard or damage to the system."
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/asr1000/install/guide/asr1routers/asr1higV8.pdf
Hope that helps,
- Dave Kosich
Cisco
Posted by WebUser David Kosich from Cisco Support Community App

CNA & "switch redundant power supply"

Just configured trunking between these switches:
2950T-48-SI
3508G-XL
3548-XL
The traffic appears to be flowing correctly through both the default VLAN and also my additional VLAN.
Now, ALL of the 2950 switches on my network display this message: "switch redundant power supply failed" when I connect to them using the Cisco Network Assistant.
Seems like the error message must be related somehow to the VLAN configuration I did.
In a nutshell, I configured all connected Gigabit ports this way:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
I only configured SOME of my switches for the trunking and additional VLAN - must all of them be configured the say way, even if I don't anticipate needing the additional VLANS on those switches?
Thanks, Susan

Hi Susan,
Do you have redundant power supplies connected to the 2950s?
If not, you are probably running into a cosmetic bug, CSCee96721.
We can confirm this by issuing a "show env" in the CLI.
You should see something like this:
"switch#sho env all
FAN is OK
Internal POWER supply is OK
RPS is NOT present
RPS is FAULTY"
Note that the last line indicates that the RPS is faulty, even though the line above it indicates that no RPS is present.
If that applies to you as well, then you are hitting this bug. CNA is polling the same information, which is why you are seeing "switch redundant power supply failed" in CNA.
The fix is in 12.1(22)EA3 and later.
HTH,
Bobby
*Please rate helpful posts.

Redundant power with UC560-T1E1-K9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for