Reference Manager compatible with Pages?

My lab uses Reference Manager for organizing our references and I was wondering if anybody knows if this is compatible with Pages? I couldn't find any info on the Ref Manager web site so if anybody currently uses this please let me know. Thanks!

As far as I know, the response is NO.
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE vendredi 27 février 2009 21:51:30)

Similar Messages

  • Is pages 3.0.3 compatible with pages 5.2?

    Hello,
    Is Pages v 5.2 compatible with v3.0.3? I have scores of documents written in Pages v3.0.3 that I would like to open in Pages v 5.2, but cannot. The documents were composed on a 2008 iMac (which died) and transferred to a 2013 MacBook Air running Mavericks. When I try to open the documents from  version 3.o.3 in version 5.2, I get an error message telling me that the document is too old.  Thanks

    Pages v5+ (including v5.2) no longer open Pages ’08 documents. Pages ’09 v4.3 is the last version that enables you to open these documents, though Pages ’08 and Pages ’09 will work if installed on Mavericks.
    Without either of the earlier Pages applications installed, you will have no way to open your older documents and export to MS Word (.doc) format, which is compatible with Pages v5.2. Also, Pages v5+ no longer supports RTF.
    Pages ’08 v3.0.3 is the version required to work on Mavericks. If  you have that on installation media, you are good to go, and if not, Pages ’09 is available on E-bay. You will find that Pages v5.2 has far fewer features and functionality than present in either Pages ’08 or ’09.

  • Is pages 11 for iOS compatible with pages 09 on my Mac?

    Is pages 11 for iOS compatible with pages 09 on my Mac?

    There is no such thing as Pages 11 although the new versions on both the Mac & iOS could be referred to as '13.
    Pages '09 cannot open files from the new versions. If you have ugraded to Mavericks you should see an update for Pages in the Mac App Store. Post back if you need help doing that.

  • Desktop Manager compatible with Blackberry Bold 5.0 OS?

    To make a long story short, the workstation I use for Microsoft Exchange e-mail is running on the Windows 2000 server OS that was provided by the corporate office. 
    Since I currently have Desktop Manager 4.7 running without problems for my Blackberry Bold, I am wondering if it will be compatible with the upcoming Bold 9700 5.0 OS.  I only need my e-mail forwarded to the Blackberry mobile. 

    Hi and Welcome to the Forums!
    Well, in most cases, I usually advise folks to use a version of DTM that is at least as new as their device OS. But in your case, that won't work since Win2k was last supported in DTM 4.7 and is not listed as supported since DTM 5.0. But, it can't hurt too much to try (just make sure you have well saved backups first!!)...what you really want to do is to install DTM and then also install your device OS update package atop DTM so that DTM can be properly modified for your specific device OS level. If it does not work, you can always fall back to 4.7.
    Good luck!
    Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
    If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
    Join our BBM Channels
    BSCF General Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • IS Extension Manager compatible with Yosemite IMAC OS X 10.10,

    I am still having problem with downloading Adobe Acrobat XI Pro. I have disabled my firewall, turned off MACKEEPER,
    I had it installed then iy kept crashing, customer support suggested I crated ANOTHER Administrator, which I did. Slowed my computer to a snail. Not to mention all my files are located in original admin. ( I am not a computer expert just a simple artist, who has the privdledge of a professional where I worked who kept my computer working. Just me now.
    I am about to just cancel my subscription of Creative Suite, all I needed was Acrobat for Downloading and viewing PDF files, the site I had to use for whatever reason would only allow download using Licensed Acrobat??
    Needless to say, I do hope I am using this forum correctly.
    any advice thanks
    [email protected]

    According to you description, this issue is about Acrobat. It has nothing to do with Extension Manager. I suppose you will get better and quicker support at Acrobat.

  • Is VZAccess Manager compatible with Yosemite?

    Has anyone been able to get VZAccess Manager to work under Mac OS X 10.10 (Yosemite beta)?

    This is pathetic verizon. What's going to happen come December 25th when thousands of people get new macs for Christmas and find out your service won't work??? Can you say AT&T?! Spend less money on those stupid commercials and fix this issue. I now can't buy a new computer for my business because your lazy IT department can't figure out how to make the two play nice? Sorry if this sounds harsh, but this is truly unacceptable for such a large company. We are talking about an Apple product here. A very popular common sold all over the world product and it's incompatible with one of your core offerings.
    Fix this please.

  • What is new with MAX 2.0 and is it compatible with Session Manager?

    We added non-IVI instrument information in, basically the same structure as for IVI instruments,
    into the ivi.ini file to keep all instrument information in the same place. Using MAX Version 1.1 caused no problems whatsoever and the system worked fine. With the advent of MAX 2.0 you seem to use ivi.ini as well as config.mxs to store instrument information. What we have found now is that given a working ivi.ini file from MAX 1.1, we end up with 2 or 3 copies of all the devices in the IVI Instruments->Devices section! When the duplicate entries are deleted and the application exited, the
    ivi.ini file is updated minus the [Hardware->] sections which contain the resource descriptors that our appl
    ications look for. As an added complication, under MAX 2.1 (From an evaluation of the Switch Executive) It behaves the same, except that it almost always crashes with one of the following errors. 'OLEChannelWnd Fatal Error', or 'Error#26 window.cpp line 10028 Labview Version 6.0.2' Once opened and closed MAX 2.1 will not open again! (Note we do not have LabVIEW on the system.) What is the relationship between the config.mxs and ivi.ini now? Also, your Session Manager application (for use with TestStand) extracts information from ivi.ini and may expect entries to be manually entered into ivi.ini (e.g. NISessionManager_Reset = True) i.e. Is the TestStand Session Manager compatible with MAX 2.0?

    Brian,
    The primary difference between MAX 1.1 and 2.x is that there is a new internal architecture. MAX 2.x synchronizes data between the config.mxs and the ivi.ini. The reason you're having trouble is that user-editing of the ivi.ini file is not supported with MAX 2.x.
    Some better solutions to accomplish what you want:
    1. Do as Mark Ireton suggested in his answer
    2. Use the IVI Run-Time Configuration functions. They will allow you to dynamically configure your Logical Names, Virtual Instruments, Instrument Drivers, and Devices. You can then use your own format for storing and retrieving that information, and use the relevant pieces for each execution. You can find information on these functions in the IVI CVI Help file located in Start >> National I
    nstruments >> IVI Driver Toolset folder. Go to the chapter on Run-time Initialization Configuration.
    I strongly suggest #2, because those functions will continue to be supported in the future, while other mechanisms may not be.
    --Bankim
    Bankim Tejani
    National Instruments

  • Is there anyway I can continue to work with Pages 09 on Yosemite??

    I do not want to use the new pages. I depend on linked text boxes, and without this feature, most of my documents are useless.
    I've read that (and experienced) that Pages 09 will not open in Yosemite.
    What can I do?? I format books and CD labels on pages. If it is no good anymore, what program is comparable? Will I be able to edit my old pages documents on other optional programs?
    I have 4 years of work, all in Pages.
    Help!!

    You do need to make sure that any files created in or last saved in Pages 5 are exported as a file compatible with Pages 4. Pages 5 will pretty much destroy files from Pages 4, so it would be best to revert to a version last saved in Pages 5. It would probably be better to export any Pages 5 files as Word for best compatibility.
    It is possible to keep both Pages 4 & 5 & have Pages 4 be the default, but removing Pages 5 is easiest. You just have to contend with the constant urging to "upgrade" to Pages 5.

  • Are documents 5.2 compatible with 5.5?

    Simple question!
    I have this big doc like a book full of tables and images.
    Is it fully compatible with pages 5.5?
    If not is there a way to open it with pages 5.2 ? Does the update uninstall the previous version ? (as it was possibile with 4.3...)
    Thanks a lot!

    You're mistaken, applefans. It is very much true that files created in Pages 5.5.x are incompatible with Pages 5.2.x. I have this issue and I have yet to read anyone here or elsewhere who doesn't.
    As you said yourself, to use files created in Pages 5.5 in Page 5.2, you first need to convert the file's format on the machine that has Pages 5.5. That means they're incompatible by default, and apparently you have to extra steps every time you save a new document if you want to force compatibility with the previous version of Pages (for example, my laptop has Yosemite but my work computer has Mavericks).
    Thank you VikingOSX for explaining the situation and a work-around (as well as another thread: Possible to downgrade to Pages 5.2?)
    It's unacceptable that Pages 5.2, only a few months old, can't open native Pages 5.5 files. Who would think going from 5.2 to 5.5 would break compatibility? People on Mavericks should at least be able to update to Pages 5.5 so they can open the files.
    On another website, I also saw someone suggest opening the file on icloud.com on the machine that has Mavericks / Pages 5.2.x. Haven't tried it yet myself, but it makes sense that this should work to at least be able to access a file that otherwise won't open at all on Mavericks.

  • Is there a way to get the Mendeley references manager to work with pages?

    Is there a way to get the Mendeley references manager to work with pages?  If not, what is the best reference manager to use with Pages?  I hate "Endnote" and, while I like "Papers", it does not have much support for shared libraries (with collaborators--their Livfe option only permits 50 shared papers and does not work well) or synching a single library across multiple Macs (i.e. home+work).  I need a good reference manager that supports 1) synching across multiple Macs, 2)working with collaborators and 3) has no problem importing different reference styles.  I don't want to use Word or Endnote unless I absolutely must--Pages is much better for everything else I do.  This is for use in preparing scientific manuscripts and grant applications.  Thanks.

    H Roth wrote:
    Is there a way to get the Mendeley references manager to work with pages? 
    If you have not done so already, make sure you also ask the people who make it:
    http://support.mendeley.com/

  • Cannot publish Webpart - "Invalid SPlistItem. The SPListItem provided is not compatible with a Publishing Page"

    Hello All,
    I have seen this error message discussed in other posts on the forums here but the solution of deactivating and reactivating server publishing/infrastructure are not working for me. In fact I encountered additional errors when reactivating publishing at
    the site level. Powershell was necessary to reactivate site level server publishing.
    Here is detail of the error I get when attempting to publish:
    Event code: 3005
    Event message: An unhandled exception has occurred.
    Event time: 18/11/2014 08:59:05
    Event time (UTC): 18/11/2014 08:59:05
    Event ID: e2e43649e2164e399fe0aa85892a002c
    Event sequence: 165799
    Event occurrence: 17
    Event detail code: 0
    Application information:
    Application domain: /LM/W3SVC/1827921427/ROOT-1-130607489469090399
    Trust level: WSS_Custom
    Application Virtual Path: /
    Application Path: C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\VirtualDirectories\portal.cooperstc.com443\
    Machine name: CTCSP2
    Process information:
    Process ID: 7392
    Process name: w3wp.exe
    Account name: COOPERS\svcSPPortalAppPool
    Exception information:
    Exception type: ArgumentException
    Exception message: Invalid SPListItem. The SPListItem provided is not compatible with a Publishing Page.
    Request information:
    Request URL: https://portal.cooperstc.com:443/CLG/Student/Videos/Pages/Test101.aspx
    Request path: /CLG/Student/Videos/Pages/Test101.aspx
    User host address: 10.33.50.119
    User: COOPERS\yangro
    Is authenticated: True
    Authentication Type: Negotiate
    Thread account name: COOPERS\svcSPPortalAppPool
    Thread information:
    Thread ID: 41
    Thread account name: COOPERS\svcSPPortalAppPool
    Is impersonating: False
    Stack trace:    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.PublishingPage.GetPublishingPage(SPListItem sourceListItem)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.Internal.WebControls.PublishingPageStateControl.RaisePostBackEventForPageRouting(String eventArgument, SPRibbonCommandHandler control, RaisePostBackEventDelegate raisePostBackEventDelegate)
    at Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.Internal.WebControls.PublishingPageSaveAndStopEditHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument)
    at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument)
    at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)

    DeActive and then ReActivate Sharepoint Site Publishing Infrastructure feature at both Site And Web level Scope.
    To Deactivate at web level, Open SharePoint Site. Click on Site Actions -> Site Settings, then click on Manage site features and then Deactivate Publishing Infrastructure feature.
    Similarly you can deactivate at site level, Open SharePoint Site. Click on Site Actions -> Site Settings, then Site collection administration and then go to Site collection features. there deactivate Publishing Infrastructure feature.
    To Reactivate again the feature, follow the above steps.
    http://www.c-sharpcorner.com/Blogs/15338/invalid-splistitem-the-splistitem-provided-is-not-compatibl.aspx
    1.The simple thing is to try deactivate and reactive the publishing features both at site collection and site level.
    2. If the above doesn't work then proceed to below PowerShell script.
     $site = Get-SPSite "http://www.mysites/  "
    $web = $site.openweb()
     $correctId = $web.Lists["Pages"].ID $web.AllProperties["__PagesListId"] = $correctId.ToString()
    $Web.AllProperties["__PublishingFeatureActivated"]="True" 
    $web.Update()
    3. The key point is PublishingFeatureActivated bag which has to be true .
    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:5xpx-C9kKgsJ:nagendra-gunaga.blogspot.com/2013/11/the-splistitem-provided-is-not.html+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
    If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered. You can reach me through http://itfreesupport.com/

  • Are there any reference manager systems that allow inserting citations into pages other than endnote?

    Are there any reference manager systems that allow inserting citations into pages other than endnote?

    Only Endnote is integrated with Pages. How other reference manager systems work, i do not know but that are not integrated with Pages.

  • Add management server: Setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0

    I want to add another management server to our existing SCOM environment. But whenever I run this setup on a new server I get stuck in the window for selecting the OperationsManager database. The database field stays blank and in the OpsMgrSetupWizard log
    there are lines that the setup version is not compatible with the database version. But I use the same installer as when I installed the other management servers a year ago.
    Maybe there is a newer setup installer? But I can't find it.
    [10:42:54]: Error:
    :Error:setup version: 7.0.9538.0 is not compatible with database version: 7.1.10226.0
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:isOMDatabase:  Read returned true.  so far, this is OM DB, not an empty DB
    [10:42:54]: Debug:
    :Connection was not open.  We will try to open it.
    [10:42:54]: Debug:
    :SqlConnectionReady returned True.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:isOMDatabase:  Read did not return true.  The MG is missing. This is not OM DB
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:Using DB command timeout = 1800 seconds.
    [10:42:54]: Always:
    :Azman store table not found in OperationsManagerDW table, assuming this is an not a valid OMDB for empty DB scenario.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.
    [10:42:54]: Info:
    :Info:DatabaseConfigurationPage: DB connection attempt completed.

    Never mind, found it!
    Apparently there was a newer version of SCOM setup in msdn and someone upgraded our existing SCOM environment. Downloaded the new setup, new report viewer controls and a System
    CLR Types for Microsoft® SQL Server® 2012 and now it works!! 

  • Firefox 5.0.1 would cause my Free Download Manager to be disabled because it is not compatibl with the new version. What ones are compatible and free?

    I have received a pop-up advisory from Firefox several times, saying that my Free Download Manager is not compatible with the recommended 5.0.1 upgrade and wold have to be disabled until the compatibility problem was corrected.
    (I think that I did download it, and that was when I got the first warning. I visited my download m manager shortly afterward, and all my download history had disappeared. I think that I then reversed the upgrade.)
    Since then, my emails will load only in Basic HTML, which I have several problems with. I don't know if that is a Google or a Firefox problem.
    So, my initial problem is that I need a reliable and easy to use free downloader before I can upgrade and get my Standard HTML back.
    What free Download Managers are compatible with Firefox 5.0.1?
    While we're at it, is 5.0.1 Beta? And what is Beta?

    Solution: (Free Download Manager)
    Go here: http://codecpack.co/download/Free_Download_Manager.html and download Free Download Manager 3.8.1067 Beta 3, it works perfectly with Firefox 5.0.1
    Solution: (to Google mail aka Gmail)
    I have had this problem for a while since I did a previous Firefox update, where I had to force Gmail to load in Basic HTML else it's next to impossible to use it. The solution is this: simply update your Java, and Gmail will work without a problem using Standard HTML. To update your Java go here: http://www.java.com/en/ and select "Free Java Download".
    And beta normally, universally, means "the not quite there yet version of the version we're aiming for" NORMALLY used during production and testing of a type of software.

  • Unable to refresh the schema of FIM MA.Getting an error in Event viewer ""the current version of database is not compatible with the one expected by Forefront Identity Manager service. The current version of database is : 1116. The expected version is :1"

    Hi,
    We have installed FIM MA with an account that have all the sufficient rights.It got created successfully and worked for Full Import and Full Sync. But, due to some version incompatabilities, we have installed a patch.PFB link for the patch.
    http://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2969673/en-us
    Now, we are trying to refresh the schema of FIM MA. While doing that we are facing an error "Failed to connect to database". The user account with which we are connecting has read and write permissions on DB.In the event viewer some errors are
    logged like  "the current version of database is not compatible with the one expected by Forefront Identity Manager service. The current version of database is : 1116. The expected version is :1122" with event ID 3. PFB images for more detailed
    view.
    Please advice how to fix the issue.
    Thanks
    Prasanthi.

    Hello,
    seems to me that you maybe only updated the syncengine but not portal/webservice.
    I had that error once after an recovery from scratch and forgot one of the hotfixes to apply to all services.
    -Peter
    Peter Stapf - ExpertCircle GmbH - My blog:
    JustIDM.wordpress.com

Maybe you are looking for