Referenced masters and IPTC

Hello, I am evaluating Aperture and playing with the different possibilities.
I'd like to know if, when I am adding IPTC informations, it's possible to update the original master referenced image. I think, in fact, that Aperture only writes in its library and add IPTC only after an export.
Is it instead possible to "sync" the original master image, so that if I open it from - for example - the finder - I see the added IPTC informations?
Thanks,
Antonio

i can see why you would want something like that, it's sometimes easier to search for your images with spotlight and keywords than to wait for aperture to open and use its slower search function on the whole library. aperture, however has a philosphy of not changing original master files, probably for some very good reasons. although it would be perfectly possible and easy (i think iview media pro did it that way on the mac) to store the ipct data in the file's resource fork, and thus not changing the original, apple chose not to mess with the file at all. after all, they already write all the info to the database and a series of plist files saved in the library. a third place to write all this, and a place where the user could easily mess up the resource fork would simply complicate things.
in aperture 2 there is a way to export your masters with the info embedded into the file, and not an xmp sidecar. you could export your masters with iptc data, delete them from the library and reimport them referenced, but there would be no way to sync the info without repeating this step and you would lose all your image edits along the way.
j

Similar Messages

  • Referenced masters and automounted filesystems in Aperture 2.1

    Folks,
    I've recently set up an automount for an nfs share from my raid for use in storing masters for my aperture library. Unfortunately, Aperture doesn't seem to be fully prepared for automounted filesystems. Here's the behavior I've noticed:
    Scenario #1:
    Create an automount that mounts the nfs share under the /Volumes directory using the Directory Utility in Leopard.
    When I do this, and 'relocate masters' for a project, things seem to work acceptably, as I can navigate to the share in the referenced files manager. However, if I exit out of Aperture and immediately restart, Aperture believes the volume is offline. Only after starting the referenced files manager does aperture become aware that the filesystem is indeed mounted and available. This is less than ideal. It defeats the purpose of configuring an automount if I still have to do something special to make the mount available or convince Aperture that the mount is already there.
    Scenario #2:
    Create the automount using the 'net' option. This mounts the filesystem under /Network/Servers/<hostname>/<share>. This is completely unusable from Aperture as far as I've been able to tell as the referenced file manager can't even navigate to /Network. My initial preference would be to use the net option in the automount configuration, but at this point, I'll take anyone's suggestions as to how to integrate automounted filesystems into Aperture...
    So, my question is, does anyone have a suggestion on how to get Aperture 2.1 to play nicely with automounted filesystems under Leopard?

    Okay the [fifth|http://www.kbeat.com/Site/Blog/Entries/2008/5/8Everything_you_never_wanted_to_know_about_color_management%2C_part5....html], and final, entry in the blog series is up. I won't for one minute claim to have all the answers to all the printing problems people keep having with Aperture. I can only say that like many of you I began with prints that I was less than thrilled with on my Canon Pro9000 from Aperture. Now, after doing everything I outlined in the five blog entries, I have prints that I'm extremely happy with. They are a close match to my screen, they have deep, rich colors and have really good detail. I really hope some of you, after reading the blog, get better results.

  • Backing up Referenced Masters

    Would like some advice on what you consider the best approach to backup when using a mix of Reference Masters and Managed Masters in the library.
    My understanding is that you cant use Vault on Referenced Masters and cant use Time Machine either.
    Your advice is greatly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    LArry

    Just to be clear, all edits and adjustments, along with thumbnails and previews, regardless of managed or reference masters, are stored in Aperture Library.
    Just use Vault to backup your Aperture Library (that has managed masters and adjustments, previews and thumbnails). Your referenced master, simply needs to be backed up by duplicating the files on another drive than where is resides. I simply save may referenced masters on two separate external drives when I read them off the card on exactly same folder/directory structure. If you get a RAID drive (other than RAID 0), it will do this for you automatically.
    Many people use multiple Ap Library and is not an issue, but not typically for the reason you've brought up. Rather, one for business and another for personal, or one each for major clients.
    Cheers

  • Freeing up laptop HD - referenced masters

    I'm working with a large project of my India trip as a I travel. I have it sub-divided into albums based on different places I've visited as I visit them (chronologically).
    I'm working on my laptop so space is limited and I now want to delete some of the initial referenced masters and externally edited versions. Is relocate masters the correct way to do this? And what about relocating externally edited versions? As I'm on a slow system, I still use PS for editing.
    I backup my entire system to two external FW drives using CCC. So I already have 'relocated masters' on external storage. So all I really want to do is delete the masters/externally edited files on my laptop but I don't want to cause a break in Aperture's links. Is there a way to take advantage of these external drive files in the whole relocating/reconnecting process? Or do I need to relocate separately?
    One possible solution I can think of: Would moving the referenced masters and externally edited images to the trash and then use Manage Referenced Files to point the broken links to the equivalent images in one of my external drives be sensible? And what about the other backup drive? If the external drive whose images the aplibrary now links to failed, could I then use Manage Referenced Files to restore the path to the other backups on my second external drive?
    Thanks for any help,
    Ross

    I think you're saying you've got the images both on your internal drive as managed and on external storage. You want to delete the managed images on your internal drive, and use the images on the external drives. If I have that right, and assuming you've made all the adjustments to the images that are managed, and wish to keep those adjustments, then your best bet is to actually delete the images on the external drive then relocate your masters from your library to the external drive. That way you'll get them off your internal HD, keep all your current adjustments, and eliminate duplicates.
    As I reread your post I'm not positive I understand what you're trying to do. You can delete referenced images from within Aperture and check the box to delete the masters. This will move your images no matter where they are to the trash. If you've then got them someplace else, edited with PS, you can import those.

  • I'm trying to export my masters to use in Lightroom, can't get the ratings to export. Tried writing the IPTC to masters and exporting with an IPTC4XMP file, no luck. These are all .jpg files. The ratings export OK if I export the versions. Any suggestions

    I'm trying to export my Aperture masters to use in Lightroom, can't get the ratings to export. Tried writing the IPTC data to the masters and adding the IPTC4XMP file when exporting, neither worked. The ratings show up in Lightroom if I export the versions. These are all .jpg's that I am exporting. Any ideas on how to fix this?
    Thanks

    There are two problems here:
    1) Aperture does not modify its "original" files on export.  Meaning with the JPEG files that Aperture will NOT modify them, and it will not write IPTC data to them.  It exports the XMP sidecar files, as you're seeing.
    2) Adobe will NOT read IPTC sidecar files for non-RAW images.  So if it sees a JPEG file, it will not look for an XMP sidecar file.  It just doesn't read them, so the data won't be imported by Lightroom.
    If you are using JPEG files, then probably the solution is to check the box in Aperture to tell it to write XMP metadata to the original files.  They're not RAW files, so they're not proprietary in any way, so writing the XMP metadata to the JPEG files is probably pretty safe.

  • Referenced masters both in Ap3 and Ap2

    I have referenced masters on an external HD that I access through our wireless network. Even though I have specified where the master images are, Aperture seems to forget or not have the correct drive name available. This is inconvenient bc now I have to locate external masters and reconnect them again. It's getting pretty annoying. Is there any way to stop this behavior? Also, tonight on Aperture 3 I tried to reconnect masters but it kept selecting a PSD file and when I clicked on the associated master file, it would not ungrey the Reconnect All button and eventually Aperture crashed.

    To convert managed masters to referenced masters gp to File->Relocate Masters..
    To have imported images made referenced in the Import Window chhose the location you want the masters stored:
    Seelct a location or create a new one.

  • I want to back up my photos to disks, but if i save my masters will it save tyne edits that i have made to the referenced photos? or to i have to make 2 disks, one for masters and one for referenced?

    Hi, i just got my mac air and moved my photos from picassa to aperture. I save my masters to an external hard drive. I also back my photos up to a disk once a month. my question is if i burn the master photos to a disk will it save my edits to the versions? or do i have to make 2 disks for each month? I have had external hard drives die on me before and I just want to make sure they are backed up correctly to disks...thanks for any help!

    Read the User Manual chapter on Backing Up.  The User Manual is good: logically presented, easy to search, and concise.  It should be the first resource you turn to in searching for answers.
    Your Library contains your Images' Versions (these are just text files -- a detail that can be ignored for the time being).  Since your Images' Masters are Referenced (= stored outside the Aperture Library package), you must back up both your Library and your Referenced Masters in order to have a complete back up of your work.
    Search the forum for some helpful comments re: backing up to plastic media v. to hard drives.  The consensus is that one's time and money are better spent backing up to hard drives at present.
    Since your Referenced Masters plus your Library makes one complete back-up, there is no reason not to put them on the same drive.
    I recommend keeping 3 copies of your work.  The active copy, and two back-ups, with one kept off-site all times (never have all three in the same location).  I also recommend keeping screen-size Previews of all Images, just in case there is some corruption or other reason that makes it impossible to create new full-size Images from your Versions (again, Versions are just text files -- they are not image-format files).

  • Importing old pictures with wrong date stamp. After adjusting date they are landing in the correct folder of referenced masters.

    I was thrilled to learn that with Aperture I could have one big library and using referenced masters, I can organize the pictures by date so I know where everything is and can backup to the cloud.  I started importing really old photos that were taken with god knows what camera and the date is wrong.  Since I had all these in date structured folders I could make a best guess on the date - not needing it to be exact, just so it shows up close enough in projects and the original lands in the right folder for future use & backup. I have come to learn that changing the metadata is only referring to how Aperture sees it.  In other words, images that were taken on 10/31/04 are still landing in the referenced masters folder on the date the camera said.  I now understand that the metadata date is not the date Aperture needs fixed.  Is the best way to fix this to delete the images from Aperture, find some tool that will adjust to the approximate real date, then reimport.  If so, can someone recommend a utility that does this? If I can fix this inside of Aperture, even better.  I saw on one of the discussions: "it's all about the Exif and IPTC and not about the file metatata."  Please feel free to learn me on that.  Cheers.

    That answers some of it - the relocate files.  That will allow me to put the files in the right year/month folder.  I imported full folders into Aperture so need to edit the metadata date for multiple pictures at the same time.  I understand when you select multiple pictures and then ajust time, it adjusts in relation to the first picture.  In my case these things were taken by all sorts of crappy cameras & re-edited years later (2003 data).  So pictures taken on the same day have 2001, 2003 & 2007 dates. I really do just wnt to set all of them to the same (ballpark) date. 
    So my goals are:
    1) have the pictures land in the right referenced folder - answered
    2) do a mass adjust time to the same date for a folder of images
    3) have the projects then land chronologically inside Aperture - not sure about this one yet
    Thanks for your help, it's very much appreciated.

  • Import photos from SD Card into a library with referenced masters

    I have the following problem:
    I would like to migrate from Aperture (that I used for the past couple of years) to Photos for OS X. (Well, let's say I feel kind of forced to  by Apple's decision to abandon Aperture and since I do not like to switch to Lightroom (which I fear will soon be available via Adobe's Cloud system!)). I successfully migrated my Aperture library to Photos. My library is a 'referenced library', i.e. a library where the original photos ('masters') are NOT inside the library but stored in a separate location. In my case the original photos are stored on a NAS. Photos recognizes all my photos and by right-clicking on a photo I can select the 'Show in Finder' option and Photos correctly shows then the location of the corresponding photo on the NAS. So far so good.
    The  problem arises when I want to import new photos from the camera (or its SD card). I plugin the SD card into the Mac and fire up Photos. Then I click on 'Import'. I do not succeed in importing the photos from the SD card in a way that the original files (masters) are copied to the NAS (the place where I keep my masters). In fact when I import then everything (also the master files) are copied into the library (which is located on the Mac's internal SSD.) This happens despite I have deselected "Copy objects into photo library" in the Photos app Preferences.
    (Another problem is that, with Aperture, I could import photos from the SD card in a way that the originals were copied to the NAS, renamed appropriately (e.g. <date>-<time>.JPG and put automatically in an Aperture-created folder structure (year/month/day). I fear that the only way to keep on working with 'referenced' masters will be by NOT using Photos' Import function directly for the import from the SD card, but first to copy 'manually' (using the Finder) the photos from the SD card to the NAS (after having created year, month, day folders manually) and then to use Photos Import function. Is this really the sad truth?
    Another problem is: When I delete a photo from the library, it will NOT be deleted from the masters! :-(
    Has anybody experienced the same problems?
    Cheers
    Rainer

    The SanDisk website has a PDF owner's guide that says the following;
    Macintosh Disk Icons: When you connect the MicroMate Reader/Writer on a Macintosh operating system, a removable disk icon labeled
    “untitled” representing the MicroMate Reader/Writer will show on the desktop when a card is inserted.
    It also has directions to drag the removable disk icon labeled “untitled” to the trash to remove the disk. There is also a support link to a ebox page on a secure site that won't let me go farther (I think I need a newer browser), so I can't find drivers.
    My problem is that the icon doesn't show up and I can't find it in any applications I try. I know the Disney camera is a toy, its for my 5 year old, but I am having the identical problem with both the Disney camera and SanDisk.

  • Aperture 3 Backing Up Referenced Masters

    I am trying to develop my workflow better.
    I shoot images into the field and download them to my laptop. I then transfer them back to my iMac when I get home. I use Aperture 3 for my pictures.
    In Aperture, I have all of my files referenced to a external drive. I want to back these photos up overnight using a Drobo or Synology NAS drive.
    Does anyone have any experience on which would be better?
    I could also implement a workflow in which the files will be referenced on the Drobo or NAS and then backed up overnight. I will be backing up the referenced just in case something were to happen to it.
    Anyone have opinions on this?

    Aperture 3 added a "Trash".
    The deleted versions go into the trash, and you have to empty the trash to truly delete them. At this point it will ask if you want to delete the referenced masters as well.
    As a pro, I'd rather not have a trash... But oh well, gotta appease the newbies.
    Message was edited by: Matthew Bergsma

  • Vault + Time Machine w/ Referenced Masters

    I know this general question has been asked several times, but I can't find a solution that matches my specific setup. I'm running Aperture off my MBP, so I have set up one external drive to hold my referenced masters. My internal drive has my aperture library with previews, etc. I also have one other external drive that is my dedicated Time Machine backup drive. How should I approach backing up? If I have Time Machine backup the aperture library and referenced masters, is there any advantage of adding a vault as well? Thanks for any help!

    Gerry,
    This ain't hard, just a bit complex.
    To answer you first question: At this point, a Vault is of little value; Time Machine does everything you need and does it automagically. (Unless you leave Aperture running all of the time.) Time Machine is much better if you use referenced masters as the Vault does not back them up.
    Time Machine is great as it creates images of your disk every hour - wonderful if you delete something by accident. People worry about filling their Time Machine disk. Don't. As long as your disk is large enough for one full back up the extra space only gets you time - that is you can go further back. For most of us, one month is all the history we will ever need. And when your disk fills, Time Machine diligently deletes the oldest data to assure that you always have a current backup. Nice.
    A clone, on the other hand, is just that, an exact (usually bootable) copy of your disk. Normally, when you update a clone it adds what you have added but it also deletes what you have deleted. Delete something by mistake two days ago and last night's backup will delete it as well. On the other hand, have your Mac die (as mine did, 3,000 miles from the nearest Apple Store) and you can plug your clone into any other Mac and you are good to go. Slick.
    Finally, off site is just that. What happens if your house burns or is robbed? You could lose your mac and all of your backups as well. There are many ways to do off site, from a hard disk that you sneaker net to your neighbor to a commercial service like Crashplan or Carbonite.
    Hope this helps.

  • Aperture thinks a project has offline referenced masters - but it doesn't!

    I've just been consolidating two Aperture libraries by exporting projects from one library and importing them into another. For the most part this has gone smoothly, but in one project all the images have the little badge with the red slash through it, to indicate that the referenced masters are offline.
    But they're not! The project itself is 2.2 GB - so all the photos are actually in it - and when I click 'consolidate masters' for that project, Aperture tells me there are no referenced masters for this project. For every image that's missing a master (if that makes sense) there's a version that's NOT missing a master. So the data's there and I can work with the image - I'm just a bit worried about making radical moves without knowing exactly what's going on
    I've tried deleting the project and reimporting it, but to no avail - also, when I delete the project, it tells me referenced masters are offline and can't be moved to the trash.

    There is a special subforum for the Android version of Reader:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/adobe_reader_forums/android?view=discussions

  • Can't reconnect Missing Referenced Masters

    I have a library which is a mixture of Managed and Referenced Masters.  Library on SSD and Referenced Masters on HDD.
    A very small number of Masters have gone AWOL and I can't reconnect them.  Using Spotlight, I can locate the actual Masters with Finder - they are just where I expect them to be, in a subfolder in a Folder called "Aperture Masters" on my HDD.
    Here is an example
    The badge on this image looks like this
    When I choose Update from Master, I get this message
    So then I try to reconnect via "Locate Referenced Files..." and get this message
    These images are findable by filtering on "Missing" or "Offline"
    All but one have the badge with the arrow and the yellow triangle.
    One has a badge like this (a kind of inverted MobileMe sourced badge
    Any ideas on how to reconnect?

    Interesting.  The User Manual I was reading is a PDF and it defines the badge as this.  Note that the badge is flipped in the two versions and the PDF doesn't mention FaceBook or Flickr.
    Seems I should re-download the User Manual

  • Aperture 3 not deleting referenced masters

    I have upgraded to Aperture 3 and unfortunately it does not delete the (newly imported) referenced master file.
    Aperture 2 always asked whether I also wanted to delete the master or not, when deleting a version. Aperture 3 has not asked me this question yet. Is this by design or is something not working?
    When a version is selected in an album and I select "File>Delete master and all versions" the versions are deleted, but when I go to the folder where the reference masters are located the file is still there. The files are in a folder on my Mac book pro.
    Thanks for any thoughts/solutions

    Aperture 3 added a "Trash".
    The deleted versions go into the trash, and you have to empty the trash to truly delete them. At this point it will ask if you want to delete the referenced masters as well.
    As a pro, I'd rather not have a trash... But oh well, gotta appease the newbies.
    Message was edited by: Matthew Bergsma

  • Referenced masters:  How can you tell where a photo's master is?

    After reading many recommendations on this site, I have set up my main library on my internal HD with referenced masters on an external HD.
    Now I need to import a job which I shot out of state and which was saved as a managed library on my MBP. So I copied it to an external drive and then Imported it into the main A3 library. That worked just fine but it seems like it copied all the masters as well as the versions from that new library into the main one.
    Before I try to relocated them, how can I tell where the master for a particular photo is located?
    Thank you very much.
    Bo

    Versions are always in the Library (they are text instructions saved to a file and applied on-the-fly to the Master in order to produce the image on screen (mostly)). Masters are either in the Library (in which case they are "Managed"), or not in the Library (in which case they are "Referenced"). The Library is a "package". A package is a container of files which shows as a single file to the user.
    Badges tell you the status of the Master on which the Version is based. No badge = Managed. Referenced Masters show a badge. Off-line Referenced Masters show a modification of this badge. Versions with Missing Masters show yet another version of this badge.
    Badges can be toggled to show or not via the Metadata Overlays. All seven of the Metadata Overlays can be customized.
    Use the filter Rule "File Status" to filter for "Managed", "Referenced", "On-line", "Off-line", and "Missing".
    If you want to move all Manage Masters to your external drive, in Photos view filter using the "File Status" Rule set to "Managed", then select all and "File→Relocate Master".

Maybe you are looking for

  • Airplay over ethernet connected Apple TV does not work

    Hey guys, I really appreciate your help! So here is my problem: I cannot use Airplay from my iPad/iPhone or my Macbook (iTunes + AirPlay Mirroring) while the AppleTV connection is via ethernet. If I disconnect the ethernet cable and activate wifi, th

  • Server does not send mails

    I have a problem with the mail server. He sends some mails not to other mail servers. I get back the message with the error: host mail.domain.de [...IP...] said: 554 5.7.1 <unknown [...IP...]>: Client host rejected: <-- please use SMTP-AUTH for mail

  • Import & Export of Internal table

    Hello All, In my requirement I need to call the MB5B program RM07MLBD. I used the code like this. SUBMIT rm07mlbd AND RETURN             WITH matnr   IN  so_matnr             WITH werks   IN  so_werks             WITH datum   IN  so_budat. Now from t

  • Export or "Save As" PDF - missing shapes in final created PDF

    Hello, I am using Illustrator CS5. I created a brochure with some images, shapes and text with minimal effects (some drop shadow). When I export or do a "save as" pdf, four of my shapes do not appear in the created pdf. What type of reasons would cre

  • Problem with News widget embedded video

    I have embedded a video in a news widget item and it plays but then if I move the cursor off the screen it stopped playing and if the cursor happens to scroll over another news event even though I haven't clicked on another event. This is quite annoy