Refurbishment settlement to material

Hi Experts,
I have done a Refurbishment process cycle for a material with condition based valuation type(DEF type to REP type) and I have done TECO.
Stock quantity is getting updated when I do GR (IW8W). But the Moving average price remains the same to all material in that valuation type(REP).
I want to settle the order cost (labor + components) to same material and get the moving average price to be adjusted.
Please advice me to correct this issue.
Thanks in advance,
Babu.K

Hi
Refurbishment will not happen from MM. It happens via asset management. Service/material purchase orders should be created with reference to concern asset with account assignment category A.
Regards
Antony

Similar Messages

  • Order settlement to Material

    Dear Friends,
    We have the requirement Order settlement to Material. We have check in Allocatioan structure, I could not find material object.
    Please help me.
    Regards
    Sree

    Hi,
    Please check the following
    Which order type you are using and which settlement profile is assigned to it. To check it, please use KOAL T Code. Now double click on Order Type and check which Settlement profile is assigned? Now to check that settlement profile go through the following path
    IMG > Controlling > Internal Orders > Actual Postings > Settlement > Maintain Settlement Profiles
    Click on Settlement Profile. Now check that settlement profile which is assigned to that order type.
    Now check the Default Object Type. it must be MAT and also check Valid Receivers.
    I hope you will to come how MAT comes from.
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Settlement of material on Project

    Hi
    How WBS settle on material ? as per my knowledge material can not settle on project WBS or network order and it only settle on production order. Is it right way to settle material on project or it is not possible. when I maintain settlement rule receiver as material system throw error message material receiver only in production order as in prerequisite settlement profile I maintain material as receiver. can any one focus on above issue.
    Regards

    Hi Pramila
    Thats correct... Material as settlement receiver is only possible for Prod Order.. You can not settle WBS on a material...
    You can create a prod order in relation to WBS.. All costs posted on production order... Later on when you settle the prod order, it gets settled onto material and the stock from production order gets assigned against the WBS element
    Thats the way it works....
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Variance is settling to Material

    Hi All
    This is a MTO Scenario where the difference between target cost and actual cost is settling on the material.
    Actual cost is less than the target cost - this variance is settling on the material and thus there is an increase in cost.
    Say For Eg. Target cost is Rs 50, Actual cost is Rs 30 (raw materialactivity cost). The variance of Rs 20 is again settling on material and the material is showing actual price as Rs 50 (Raw materialactivity cost+variance)
    Actual price should be 30 and not 50.
    Rs. 20 is getting posted to FI too as price gain variance.
    The settlement rule is - settle 100% to Material.
    Is this standard SAP ?  Does variance gets settled to Material ? shouldnt it be settled to cost center ?
    Material has V (Moving Average Price) Indicator.
    COPA Is not activated.
    Edited by: Khyati Patel on Nov 8, 2011 4:55 PM
    Edited by: Khyati Patel on Nov 9, 2011 7:32 AM
    Edited by: Khyati Patel on Nov 9, 2011 7:33 AM

    Hi Kyathi,
    If the M2O production/process order is for non valuated sales order stock, settlement receiver is SDI (Sales order). if COPA is active, in Sales order, settlement receiver is Profitability segment.
    If the M2O is for valuated sales order stock, my understaing is settlement receiver is MAT (material) only. if COPA is active, settlement receiver can also be Profitability segment in addition to MAT. My understanding is that Production order varinaces will not go to Sales Order in this case.  
    Let m eknow if you need any further details.
    Thanks & Regards,
    ADI

  • Settlement for Material

    Hi ,
    I have Production Order for 1 FG which is having 10 SFG in assembly line and the Production is based on MTS .
    During line assembling there was some material consumed against Rework  . When settling Production order
    the variance is settled in Variance a/c ( GL a/c ) . I dont want to settle this to G/L But want to settle to Material
    ie COGS .
    example :  Production order Qty  10
                     Cost of FG ---  10 Rs each ( standard cost )  + overheads ( x )         
                     variance Rs 20/-
                     total  Production cost Rs 120  + x
    The variance should settle to material ie COGS  ie Rs 10 + x / 10  + 2
    how to do in SAP ?
    Regards,
    Jaya

    closing

  • Rebate settlement with material insted of amount

    hi sd gurus
                   my client requirement is he want settlle rebate with material(instead of amount) how can we settle

    Hi,
    001                Customer/material                      BO01
                           % rebate)
                         Customer/rebate group                 BO01
                           (% rebate)
    002                Customer/material                      BO02
                         (Quantity Dependent)
    Along with the rebate agreements mentioned here also please check this on how to settle rebates based on customer, material ( your requriement) in the following link.
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4a/ac853478616434e10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm">Rebate settlements</a>
    Hope it helps. Please reward if useful.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sadhu Kishore

  • Settlement of Material

    Hi All,
    Should material used in PM orders settle to a Primary or secondary cost element?
    I had a disagreement with the MM consultants and want to know what is the right way of doing this.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think you are talking about settlement of  the actual cost incurred when you consume a material using a PM order.
    Generally PM orders are settle to the receiver as cost center , which is the CO process. However you can settle to G/L a/c, WBS , Orders etc.  So when a cost element carries cost with in CO is secondary cost element and  when a cost element carries cost between FI and CO are primary cost element.
    Hope I think It may be helpful to you.
    Regards
    DP

  • Settlement for Material that has Co-Product

    Hi people,
    I have a main material that has 3 co-products.
    In the transaction: COR2 in settlement rule, we have put the % for each product (for the main product and his co-products).
    When I execute the transaction CO8B to (preliminary settlement for co-procuts) the system run ok, but until this time, nothing was to the inventory.
    So I thought that when we executed the transaction KO88, the amount will go to the inventory in the main produtc, but it didn´t happened.
    Maybe i did some thing wrong.
    Could you help me how I can make the settlement to show the value in the main material?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Check the Apportionment structure in the Main material master, I think you should have given Equivalence number for the main and all the 3 co products.
    Same ratios will be taken up in the Process order too. you are not required to give %.
    Just check whether this is in place.
    CO8B is the transaction code to divide the cost on the Process order  in the ratio mentioned to all the Products. But this will not flow the cost to the Inventory.
    Once you do the above transaction, then the cost on the Process order is divided among the Main and Co products.
    Then you execute KO88, it only settles either the WIP or the variance on the order to FI. But Inventory is increased when you do GR
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ravi

  • Settlement to Material Based on Grade

    Hi guys,
    Our client has the following requirement:
    Suppose that they have 2 material code: X and Y, both are the same material, but are separated based on grade (quality).
    Both use the same BOM and routing. Initially, when creating production order, material X will be created.
    Now, their requirement is that they want the FOH to be allocated only for material X (first grade material), and the material Y will not get any FOH.
    How can we achieve this in controlling?
    I am thinking of utilizing source structure for this, but to my knowledge it is only available in CRM.
    Please kindly suggest
    Thank you very much in advance
    BR, Erwin

    Hi,
    That is interesting, but that means that we have to create a material number for Y.
    Actually, when we approach the by product concept, i am thinking of using the fixed by-product cost feature.
    Variance and cost wise, i think this fixed by product cost feature is good enough, but i think that it will still need further testing.
    However, i still am not sure about the impact of by product to material ledger since material ledger with price determination 3 is active in our client.
    Thank you for your response
    Best Regards,
    Erwin

  • SES Cost not settling on REFURB Material in Refurbishment Process.

    Hi Experts
    I carried out a Refurbishment Process with Valuation Types. On the last part when i do a SES the cost of the SES is not settling to material wich has a valuation type REFURB.
    For the above one i created a material code with 3 valuation type as New / Defect / Refurb. The cost of Defect was set to 0 and cost of REFURB was also set to 0. Should i do any changes while creating the REFURB Valuation type.
    Can any one help me out....
    Regards
    Venkat.

    hi
    where the cost is settling to. whether any actual cost is there
    also refer the following link
    Doubt related to Refurbishment process
    also refer  http://www.scribd.com/doc/49382166/X72-Scen-Overview-EN-AU-Rotables-Management
    regards
    thyagarajan
    Edited by: thyagarajan krishnamurthy on Jul 18, 2011 1:05 PM

  • Refurbish work order get settled before this refurbished material returned

    Hello guy, can somebody help to analyze the problem I have in our production system.
    the problem is that I found a strange thing that one of the refurbishment work order get settlem and the refurbished material is not yet returned back to stock.
    And I check the cost report of this work order, and found this cost receiver is material, which means this cost is already posted against material.
    I have no idea why  this can be settled?
    However it is impossible to settle refurbishment work order before refurbished material returning back to stock in my opinion.
    Can any one help me, many thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    The refurbishment order can be settled to material when if it is in System status
    DLV- delivered, after GR has been done or
    TECO - If the order status is Technically completed
    So in your case the order status may be in Teco status so that the cost is settled to Material before u do GR.
    So check the System status of the maintenance order.
    Reverse the settlement & do GR & settle again to material.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Can we settle refurbishment order periodically

    Hi All
    our client want to settle refurbishment order periodically to material.
    In standard SAP will allow this after TECO.
    They r taking more time to complete these orders and costs are setteled in Orders and not reflecting in monthly cost balance sheet.
    can we settele initially to one separate cost center and tranfer cost (oder wise ) to material after teco.
    It should reflect that the cost should be reduced in cost center and updated in material

    Hi,
    Please note that in refurbishment case cost is settled to material and this settlement need to be periodic.
    You can do settlement after TECO. TECO is technical completion and settlement can be done after TECO also.
    However as you said cost are settled to cost centre ,but how it is possible coz settlement receiver is material and not cost centre for refurbishment.They may not able to see correct costs in respective period but cost will always get settled to material(means added to inventory accounts after settlement).
    It is advisable to settle incurred costs on refurbishment order as early as possible,so costs will reflect into inventory accounts and within correct period and this is standard practice also.
    regds,
    atul
    Edited by: Atul Mali on Apr 15, 2009 1:52 PM

  • Settlement of order to Material

    Hi group
    if by any way we can settle normal order( non refurbishment order ) to material
    i am using normal order for workshop activity and want to settle cost to Material
    Thank
    Ajay

    HI
    go to spro GO TO PM & CS NODE
    Maintenance & Servcie Processing -BASIC Settings -GENERAL order Settlement -Maintain settlement profiel -select your settlement profile -Default object type -Set Material as object type then save
    your order will content material as default
    then in option you can maintain other settlement receivers also
    Regards
    pratap

  • Settling production variances when the price control of the material is "V

    Hi,
    Scenario: 1) Materials are maintained at moving average price.
                    2) Production variances need to settle to material and MAP need to be adjusted.
    Issue:  When the closing stock of the material is less than the negative variance need to be settled from the production order   the system is giving the message "Moving average price for material is negative"
    Questions: 1) What is the solution for settlement of negative variance to material when there is no stock?
                       2) Is there is any way to settle these variances to price difference account only when the stock is not available. if stock is available the variance has to adjust the stock, if not settle to the price difference account. Is there anys standard settling for this?
    Advance thanks for your help
    Regards
    Koteswararao Padarti

    Hi Rao
    You should never have Price Control V for In House made material...
    That will ruin your inventory valuation forever.. Consider the eg below if your price control is V
    1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and at period end if Qty is lying in stock, 10 variance will also be inventorized
    BUT, now consider this
    1. 1. Your moving price in mat master is 100 USD
    2. You Mfr on Jan 1 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    3. You Mfr on Jan 10 @ Actual cost = 110 in Prod order and Qty = 1.
    Upon GR, GR will happen @ 100 and variance lying is 10 in prod order
    4. On jan 15, you consume Qty 1 and qty lying in stock is 1
    5. In period end, when you do settlement, following will happen
    a. For prod order 1: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price will shoot upto 110
    b. For prod order 2: Qty Mfd 1 and Qty lying in stock 1 - Result: variance 10 will be inventorized.
    Mvg Avg price (MAP) will shoot upto 120
    System wont check whether the qty lying in stock pertains to prod order 1 or 2... It will simply check if the Qty of prod order matches with qty lying in stock. hence, it will keep on inventorizing variance in this case.... and your MAP will touch the sky
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Settlement of WBS into Material

    Dears,
    How to WBS settle in Material i.e. Finished Goods and  when I execute transaction CJ88, processing category gives status no  change in stead of Settlement Executed.
    Please give reply
    Regards
    Kalpik

    Hi,
    Please check the following details for settlement of project for recevier i.e. Materials in your case.
    1. Configuration of Settlement for the project with necesary settings
    2. Allocation structure need to be configured properly with assignment of all cost elements
    3. Settlement rule to be maintained for the WBSE / Project defition with valid receiver of the cost from WBSE.
    4. Cost should be incurred in the sender WBSE
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

Maybe you are looking for