Reg. Capacity levelling for the maintenance order

Hi all,
I am using SAP R3 ECC6.0.
I have created a maintenance order with order type PM01(Internal).In this order i have assigned Work Center 1 with the Work center category as Labour.And i have assigned 2 operations for this Work center in the maintenance order with the total hours of 60 HRS. and i saved this order & made the status to release.
Then i went to Tcode CM33 and there i inputed the Work center name and executed it.It opens a Graphical View.But in that view my order no is not displayed .Previous order no. which is there already for that Work center is shown there.
What could be the Reason.
As an alternate checking i went to T code CM31 order view.There i Inputed my order no. and executed it but it throws a message
"No Capacity requirements were found in the evaluation period"
"No work centers or orders were found"
What could be the reason.
Tell me how to overcome this issue.
More over i want to make dispatch in the capacity levelling.
Thanks in advance,
M.Badrinarain.

hi badri,
are you checking in the same period ? and next check ur overall profile and time profile assigned to ur overall profile .... u will find order no , operation no .... and once u dispatch operation status gets DSPT .
regards
pushpa

Similar Messages

  • How to check, when the Maintenance Order was deleted

    Hello Experts,
                          Can you please tell me of how to check for the maintenance order that when it was deleted and who has deleted that.
    If any T-Code is there or at the Table level also to check the requirement.
    Regards,
    Yawar Khan

    If you want to track when you have put deletion flag, you can track it using above mentioned techniques.
    If you archived (deleted) permanently, then using archival history only, you can check I guess.
    Check these links. While deleting maintenance order, we can hisorical order with same number. Using that creation date, you can track.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e6552462a11d189000000e8323d3a/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/8d/3e4d2f462a11d189000000e8323d3a/frameset.htm

  • Budget Process (Linked the maintenance Order into Internal Order) in EAM

    Dear Experts,
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM & FICO module live w.e.f. 2007 (PM not live)
    Process Managed thru Internal Order (Order Type: RPMT)
    Budget managed through Investment Management (IM); Budget is directly entered against the IO using transaction IM52
    Scenario for Repair & Maintenance with only MM, FICO & PM module live (PM went live in 2010)
    It was proposed to assign budget against each Maintenance Order.  Since the number of maintenance orders being used is very high, it was decided to link the MO & IO so that budget will be assigned to the IO and when the MO is settled against the IO, the budget in IO can be deducted accordingly. The proposed process to assign budget in Internal Order against each Maintenance Order are given below-:
    1.)     In EAM process one can plan/procure material and External Services only when the Maintenance Order is created & released but practically it has to be planned long before any Maintenance Activity (Maintenance Order to be linked with the estimate so that PO can be created against the estimate).
    2.)     The no. of Maintenance Order generated in EAM Module is very large as Maintenance order is created for almost each and every maintenance activity. It is cumbersome to allocate the budget to each and every maintenance order. There should be a single estimate for maintenance activity (as in MM module) and that should be linked to maintenance order so that the actual cost of Indent/Service Entry Sheet can be deducted automatically from the estimate (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    3.)      While doing return Indent the cost of return material is not being added to the maintenance order automatically (Maintenance Order is to be linked with estimate).
    4.)      If Material & External Services not planned in the maintenance order (estimate), the user must be able to do that through Internal Order (estimate), hence the Internal Order must be link to the Maintenance Order. They should able to record the planned & actual cost in the maintenance Order.
    Process followed:
    1.) Created Internal Order in KO01 for Repair & Maintenance Order Type
         Assigned budget to Internal Order thru IM52
    2.) Created PM order and assigned Internal order against Settlement Order in tab  
         u2018Locationu2019 and in Settlement Rule with 100%. In this Section attach the Internal  
         Order with selection type u2018ORDu2019. 
    3.) Released both orders and issue the Material for particular Operation and then   
         determine the Cost for material .After that performed MIGO for consumption of
         materials.
    4.) Settled the PM order in KO88.
         Settlement process was successfully saved.
    Problem faced:
    After posting the goods movement (against each Maintenance Order) and settlement of the maintenance order against IO, we still find the budget assigned to the IO is not consumed/deducted.
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
        immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
        maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly 
        added to the available budget of internal order.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by 
        maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal  
        order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    4.  It must not be allowed to create reservation from the internal order of order type
         RPMT.
    5.  In case of external service in the maintenance order, the unit of
         measure in the requisition is set to u201CD (days)u201D by default. System does not allow  
         changing the unit of measure in the requisition (it should allow to change the unit
         of measure or set the unit of measure u201CJOBu201D).
    6.) When the material is issued from  the store through reservation generated  in
         maintenance order, system does not check for budget in Internal Order  
         (estimate)/Maintenance Order while issuing material from store.
    Thanks & Regards
    Deepak Soni

    Hi,
    1. Actual cost of maintenance is not reflected in the internal order
    immediately. We have to run cost settlement (t-code KO88) for the
    maintenance order each time the actual cost is incurred in the maintenance order.
    As per the standard system budgeting is done against the actual cost only. And until you settle your order the actual cost from
    maint order are not getting transfered to IO. Once they are transfered system is checking for the budget.
    2. Also in the case of return indent, the value of returned material is not directly added to the available budget of internal order.
    This is similar to first point, when you return goods there will be negative cost on the order, this has to be settled until that system will not compare the IO budget with maintenance order actual cost.
    3. When the material is issued from store through the reservation generated by maintenance order, system does not check for budget in the internal order/maintenance order while issuing material from the store.
    The budget you have assigned is at IO, how can system will check the budget while issueing goods for maintenance order. We may have to develop or use some user exit over here. Which will trigger checking of budget from the settlement receiver IO for that maintenance order.
    I think you may have to go for development. These are my observations from my experience.
    Regards,
    NNR

  • Tables for tracing the Maintenance Order Operation to Purchase requistion

    Hi Everyone,
    Can any one suggest appropriate table for finding the link for tracing Maintenance Order Operation to Purchase Requistion for Service Items.
    My requirement if I give the Order Number, I require Operations in it & PR Item associated if they are Service Items.
    Regards,
    MLN Prasad

    Hi got the Answer myself & thanks fro the answers given by you all.
    The exact way how I got is Pass AUFNR to AFKO and get AUFPL.
    Use this AUFPL in AFVC where we get VORNR (operation Number) also.
    You can use the AUFPL in EBKN ande can get tje PR (BANFN).
    Bye,
    MLN Prasad

  • How to create a PR for each Maintenance Order

    Dear All,
    Please guide me how to create a PR for each Maintenance Order.
    I test on Ides, I have some Maintenance Orders, all of them require the same stock material. When I run MRP, system always create one PR for all requirements. I don't know how to change.
    Regards,
    QuangDD

    Hi,
    As you planning for Stock Items, by running MRP, system will create single PR only. If it is non stock items, then it would be possible to create different PR based on Orders.
    Regards,
    Maheswaran.

  • Goods issue for plant maintenance order

    Goods issue with ref to plant maintenance order( Componenets of the order) is not possible in transaction code MIGO. Error message " MIGO is not possible for the refurbishment order".
    Goods issue for the same order can be posted with transaction MB!A.

    hi santhosh
    kindly check the order type .i think you are using MB1A for refurbishment process.but it is not possible.only maintenance order can be posted via MB1A
    follow the procedure for goods issue in refurbishment order.
    Choose Logistics ® Plant maintenance ® Maintenance processing ® Completion confirmation ® Goods movement ® Goods movement.
    The entry screen for a goods issue appears.
    Choose the pushbutton For order.
    Enter the relevant order number in the dialog box and choose Continue.
    An entry screen appears.
    Choose Copy.
    The Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box appears.
    Choose Reference document.
    Enter the order number in the Refurbishment order group box and choose Execute.
    A list appears with the planned serial numbers for the refurbishment order.
    Check the selections of serial numbers, for whose material you want to post a goods issue, and choose Copy.
    The serial numbers are copied into the Maintain Serial Numbers dialog box.
    Choose Exit window.
    The goods issue is posted.
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Route not determing automatically at sales order level for some sales order

    Dear All ,
    Route not determing automatically at sales order level  for some sales orders.We are using automatic route determination without wt group,eventhough we have configured the required settings
    I have checked all the forums but didn't find any solution for the same.
    Looking for your inputs .
    Thanks inadvance
    Regards
    Venkat

    Hi
    1. Copare the Routes which are Automatically determined and which are not automatically determined
    2. Have you mainted this route to be RELEVANT FOR TRANSPORTATION without this check route will not get picked up.
    SPRO > Logistic General > Shipping > Basic Shipping Function > Routes > Define Routes > Define Routes and stages > Select the Route and check for it's settings > CHECK MARK Relevant for Transport. Without this check the route will not get picked up as of my understanding.
    Thanks
    RB

  • VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order

    Hi All,
    I have a case where VA00 condition type not getting determined for the returns order that has been created with respect to the billing document.
    When the pricing conditions are being copied from invoice it is getting copied but later it is getting deleted in the include LV61AA42.
    Note:VA00 condition type is getting deleted from the  internal table tkomv[].
    If any one came across  this scenario can you please help me.
    Request your valuable inputs

    Hi,
    Please check the copy control setting in VTAA.
    Maintain the pricing type as "D" at item category level for the respective document type .
    Hope this will resolve your issue.
    Regards,
    Krishna O

  • Adding Variant in Header Level in the Sales Order

    Field "Card Verification Value" (CVV) is part of the Standard from Support Package SAPKH47028 onwards. But if you like you can use a variant for screen SAPMV45A4440 and set
    field "Card Verif.Code" to invisible in this variant.
    This is the reply from SAP after implementing the new support pack. Now there is an additional field in VA01 that I am trying to remove.
    I can add the variant in Table Settings but that is on Item Level in the Sales Order (VA01). How do I do it in Header Level?

    Hi,
    Go to SHD0 ,write down the Transaction code , transaction variant then go to Tab " With Processing'.
    Now you will be in T Code VA01 ,press enter and you will get all the variants maintained in Header Level.
    Now you can activate / deactivate as per your requirement.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • Origin Object Type for Plant Maintenance Orders in Profit Center Accounting

    Hi,
    I want to make a selection for plant maintenance orders in transaction KE5Z, report for line items in Profit Center Accounting. When checking possible input options for the selection field <b></b>Origing Object Type<b></b> the system shows value 15 for Maintenance Orders. However I discovered in our system the maintenance orders are reported as Origing Object Type 03, which is Overhead Orders according to the selection list. So I cannot distinguish between overhead orders and maintenance orders in this report.
    What is the cause our maintenance orders are assigned to Origin Object Type 03 in stead of 15 and what is the customizing transaction to correct this ?

    Looks like, this is no longer supported. Refer to note 168004 and  102434.
    Cause and prerequisites
    These functions were not programmed to meet the above requirements.
    As of Release 4.0, the object type is transferred directly.
    Solution
    Once you have implemented the advance correction. the origin object type 'Overhead cost order' (03) is assigned irrespective of what is the SCOPE for orders.
    As a result of implementing this note or as of Release 4.6B, the order category distinguishes between overhead cost orders and production orders in the origin object type. In this case, the following origin object types result (as described above in 1.):
    Order category 04 to 10, 40 => 04 (production order)
    All other order categories => 03 (overhead cost order)
    The logic that the origin object type was set depending on the object class (as described above in 2.) is no longer supported. The object class can be evaluated separately in Reporting. -
    The corrections of this note refer in Release 4.0B to the corrections from Note 102434.

  • Bapi's for creating Maintenance order in IW31 with notification

    Hi All,
       Is there any bapi's for creating Maintenance order with Notification number in the transaction iw31.
      Also is there any bapi's for creating measurement document.
    Points will be awarded.
    Regards,
    vinoth

    RFC MeasDocument: Individual Processing, Create
    MEASUREM_DOCUM_RFC_SINGLE_001
    RFC MeasDocument: Individual Processing, Change/Display or Read
    MEASUREM_DOCUM_RFC_SINGLE_002

  • Set as default value the Item Category in the Maintenance Order

    Hello everyone,
    We are trying to find a user exit in order to set as default value the item category in the Maintenance Order once the Material has been introduced (Tag Components).
    SAP Customizing let the user set the Item Category automatically per Material Type, but we need to set different Item Categories to materials belonging to the same material type.
    We would really appreciate any help relating this issue.
    Thank you very much,
    Víctor Liedo

    Dear Paul,
    Thank you very much for your response.
    I had already tried customizing mentioned by Pithan, but it did not work because we need to set different Item Categories for Materials with same Material Type.
    We have been searching for exits which may let us set Item Category in the Maintenance Order, but it does not seem to be possible.
    What you say about adding some custom validation through user exit, not to set item category as default value, but to check if the one entered is valid, sounds the best way of achieving our commitments.
    I have tried to look for CNEX0037 & CNEX0038, by using transactions SE37 and SE38, search for programs and functions modules, but it did not work. Could you please tell us what kind of objects are?
    Thank you very much in advance.
    Víctor Liedo

  • One Purchase Requisition for One Maintenance Order

    Dear Consultants,
    We have implemented mySAP ECC 6.0.   We have more than 20 line items in one Maintenance order for  Item category N. Curently system is generating Purchase requisitions by line itemwise for Item category N(Non-stock items). Our client requires only one purchase requisition for every Maintenance Order. Is it possible to generate one PR for one Maintenance Order? If possible please give us the solution.
    Thanks,
    Dev

    Dear Pete Atkin,
    With your help my issue has been resolved. Thank you very much.
    With Best Regards,
    Dev

  • Controlling Level At The Production Order Level

    Hi,
    I want to set the ML controlling level to the production order level because I want to see the actual BOM used for each production order at the production order level. Since a different BOM may have been used for each production order (although the FG is the same) i must be able to see the actual BOM for each production order at the CKM3N screen.
    However in the controlling level setting there is no way to set the controlling level up to the production order level. May i know why?

    hi
    check this link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/b2/6d118acb0a11d28a150000e83234f3/content.htm
    check whether production order level is possible. i dont thinks so.but it highly affects your system performance.
    krishna

  • Set deletion flag in the maintenance order

    Hi all,
    Am not able to set the deletion flag from the maintenance order, the :set: button is not active. can anyone help me in this regards?
    Or is there any tcode for setting deletion flag to maintenance orders?
    Thanks
    Anish

    hi
    i think it is probably authorization issue ie you don't have the authorization to put the deletion flag
    or check whether you have technically completed the order ,if not try to TECO and then try
    regards
    thyagarajan

Maybe you are looking for