Reg :Changing the query

HI
My requirement is to make a small change in a query which is available in production with out changing in Quality .When i am trying to change i got the error message like Error :System is not set to changeable - Objects are not changeable.How to change the report with out accessing tcode se06 and scc4 .Please advise.
Regarsd
Arun

Hi Arun Kumar,
Pls follow below mentioned steps
Go to T Code Ras1---Transport Connection---Here on right hand top corner u will find Object Changability now click on that---a new window will open and search for below mentioned items and Initially u can see as Not Changable and when you double click on that it will change to Changeable Original.
BITM     BEx Web Item     Changeable Original
BTMP     BEx Web Template     Changeable Original
ELEM     Query Element     Changeable Original
QVIW     Query View     Changeable Original
XLWB     Workbook     Changeable Original
UOMT     Quantity Conversion Type     Changeable Original
Regards
Albaik
Edited by: albaik on Mar 19, 2010 1:41 PM

Similar Messages

Changing the query on a view object

I have a view object right now, based on an entity. It is the default view object, so that means the query in the view object is straight forward, it grabs all of the attributes from the table. And there is no WHERE clause.
In reality I only want to show a finite set of rows from my table. Every time a record is changed/edited in this entity and committed, a new row in the database is created with the same information (I'm using CreateWithParams) except for a few columns.
I actually don't really have update on this table, just creation of new rows. But to the user, I want it to 'look' like they are editing something in the table.
Example:
12, 11:32,Thompson, 60 (the user edits this information in an adf table, and a new row is created in the db)
12, 11:55, Thompson, 75
I have a timestamp (see above) field in the database that is used as part of my primary key, so that I know which record is the latest.
When the VO query is run, I want the user to only see the latest row from the db.
12, 11:55, Thompson, 75
So...
I went to my VO, and I changed the WHERE query to add this:
where t1.TimeStamp = (Select MAX(t2.TimeStamp) FROM rcl.x t2 where t1.uid = t2.uid);
Now, this isn't a mysql/sql question. There's actually a better query that I'd rather run, but the VO editor doesn't allow me to change the query itself....
When I save the new WHERE to my VO, run my page again, I get the expected result (showing me only the latest records).
However, when I try and sort on the table in which my data is displayed, I am now getting ORDER BY errors.
I don't want my VO to be read-only sql based. I want to be able to update my table, so I have my VO running off of the entity.
Why doesn't the VO allow me to change the query itself? (Like do a subquery, instead of having my where clause do the work)
Why are order by errors being thrown when I sort on my adf table after changing the where clause in my view?
Hopefully I wasn't too convoluted in the explanation of my problem..
Thanks in advance,
Joel

HI Joe,
Regarding your problem you can do one of the following tasks:
1- easily to tuning on your view object, I mean in the tuning page of the view you can set that only return 1 record or 2-3 record fetch not all the record.
in the order by you will order by the timestamp field and descending.
2- you can order by the timestamp descending and in the where clause only set the rownum<2 (will return the last record) you can also set rownum<5 and get the 4 last record etc.
3-editing the view query in the expert mode is not advised at all because of many consequences that you will face.
4- maybe it is not bat that you add a readonly view for the table you mentioned and every time you unpdate the entity just re-execute the read-only view.( this method maybe is good maybe is not it depends on your business logic)
Regards.
Edited by: Amir Khanof on Sep 3, 2010 11:11 PM

Precautions to be taken while changing the Query read mode in PED system

Dear Experts,
I got a task to change the Query Read mode for more No. of queries in Production system directly itself.
Request you to let me what are the steps to be followed/precautions to be taken while changing the Query Read mode in PED.
one more doubt regarding this.....If i plan to change the Read mode of Query say Q1, how can i come to know weather the Q1 is executing or not executing by that time.
Thanks in advance for valuable response.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh - Kumar

Hello,
You can change the query read mode in transaction 'RSRT', here are the steps:
1) Access transaction RSRT and enter the query name
2) Select the 'Properties' option
3) Un-check the 'Info provider' setting next to the 'Read mode' --> This enables you to change the read mode of the query --> Execute
4) Choose the option 'Generate Report' to re-generate the query program
Hope this info helps.
Thanks
Bala

Problem while changing the query of the field in Oracle apps 11.5.10

Hello All,
Requirement:
User want to change the query of the LOV attached to Ordered item field on Line items tab on the Sales order form in Order managment
Block name = 'LINE'
Field name = 'ORDERED_ITEM_DSP'
LOV attached to this field in FMB: ITEMS
LOV attached to this field in front end: ENABLE_LIST_LAMP
Problem: Following code is firing at all points (Debug messages are appearing at all points) but Query of the LOV attached to item is still same.
How can in FMB LOV is "ITEMS" and in front end "ENABLE_LIST_LAMP"
My guess is there is some problem with the LOV name which we are passing in the code below. Because LOV name attached to item are different in front end and FMB. There is no LOV in FMB which has “SYSTEM ITEMS Description” kind of structure.
I have written following code in custom.pll (l_chr_rg_query is query taken from the record group attached to “ITEMS” named LOV with some modifications ex: rownum<6 so that it will show only 6 records in LOV if it is really firing our query for LOV)
IF ( form_name = ‘OEXOEORD’
AND block_name = ‘LINE’
AND field_name = ‘ORDERED_ITEM_DSP’
AND event_name = ‘WHEN-NEW-ITEM-INSTANCE’
THEN
MESSAGE (‘message1’);
l_chr_rg_name := ‘XXLION_UNIFORM_CODE_RG’;
l_chr_rg_query :=
‘SELECT item, item_id, item_description, inventory_item_id,item_identifier_type,null item_identifier_type_meaning, ‘
|| ‘inventory_item, address, cust_address, item_definition_level ‘
|| ‘FROM oe_return_items_v ‘
|| ‘WHERE (sold_to_org_id = :parameter.lov_num_param1 OR sold_to_org_id IS NULL)’
|| ‘ and rownum < 6 ORDER BY item’;
MESSAGE (‘message2’);
l_rg_id := FIND_GROUP (l_chr_rg_name);
MESSAGE (‘message3’);
IF ID_NULL (l_rg_id)
THEN
MESSAGE (‘Creating record group here’);
l_rg_id :=
CREATE_GROUP_FROM_QUERY (l_chr_rg_name, l_chr_rg_query);
END IF;
errcode := POPULATE_GROUP (l_rg_id);
MESSAGE (‘ERROCODE is : ‘ || errcode);
L_lov_id := FIND_LOV (‘ITEMS’); --My guess is this LOV name is the source of problem.
MESSAGE ('Error code is4');
SET_LOV_PROPERTY (l_lov_id, group_name, l_rg_id);
MESSAGE ('Error code is5');
SET_ITEM_PROPERTY ('LINE.ORDERED_ITEM_DSP', lov_name, 'ITEMS');
END IF;

I found that there is no problem with code. My problem is not technical, its a functional problem.
It is related to Inventory's "System Items" KFF.
Can anybody tell me, to this "System Items" KFF, one value set is assigned. but it is of none type of value set. so from where the values in LOV are coming?

Error when trying to change the Query in Bex??

Hi Gurus,
I have a query based on infocube. When I am trying to change the query, its giving me the error "This component was edited with a more recent version of Editor. You also have to use the more recent version to edit further. Further processing not possible. Update your front end".
Please help with this.

Hi, I am actually stuck here. Can you please let me know which among these is the higher version.
1) Final Release 3.50
Version 3500.3.016
2) Final Release 3.50
Version (Revision 481)
Because it is working fine in the 1st one whereas its throwing that error pop-up in 2nd one(as soon as we select the Change query global definition option) .

How to change the query of detailVO,

Hi,
I have 2 VOs, say HeaderVO and LinesVO, these VOs are used to create a view link - HeaderToLinesVL - HeaderVO is Master VO and LinesVO is DetailVO. These VOs and VL are used in HGrid. Depending on the search criteria entered by user I have to change the query of HeaderVO and LinesVO. I am able to change query of HeaderVO using setQuery, but when setQuery used on LinesVO, it is throwing an exception saying Query can't be changed because it is detail VO. Is there any other way to change the query. Or any other idea to implement this functionality.
Thanks
Shaneed

Hi,
I have 2 VOs, say HeaderVO and LinesVO, these VOs are used to create a view link - HeaderToLinesVL - HeaderVO is Master VO and LinesVO is DetailVO. These VOs and VL are used in HGrid. Depending on the search criteria entered by user I have to change the query of HeaderVO and LinesVO. I am able to change query of HeaderVO using setQuery, but when setQuery used on LinesVO, it is throwing an exception saying Query can't be changed because it is detail VO. Is there any other way to change the query. Or any other idea to implement this functionality.
Thanks
Shaneed

Multi Provider Changes - The Query cannot be executed

Hello,
I added a new characteristic to an existing multiprovider on which queries already exist.
I changed one of the existing queries adding that newly added characteristic.
Now the query cannot be executed. Please see the log...
I could successfully execute the query in RSRT....
Diagnosis
Characteristic 0BILL_TYPE is used in the Query Designer, but was deleted from the InfoProvider.
System response
The query cannot be executed.
Procedure
Characteristic 0BILL_TYPE is used in the query to be executed even though it was deleted from the InfoProvider. The problem can be solved by changing the query in the Query Designer. Here, you get a repair proposal, which removes the missing InfoObject from the query. Afterwards, check whether or not the query was defined correctly.
You can also delete the query.
Additional technical information:
IOBJNM = 0BILL_TYPE
ELTUID = Sell-In Qty
ELTTP = SEL
Notification Number BRAIN 407
Close
Any siggestions of how to adjust the multiprovider.
Thanks,
Vish

The check in query designer says that query is correct.
Only when I try to execute using the web it says that Char doesn't exist in infocube.
The query works fine in Analyzer & RSRT....I guess something got to do with the Browser or web..
Thanks,
Vish

How to change the query ?

Gurus,
Please clarify this
Select ils.item,(nvl(sum(decode(tdh.loc_type,'S',decode(tdh.tran_code, 1,tdh.units,0),
'W',decode(tdh.tran_code,30,0,31,0,32, tdh.units,33, tdh.units,37,0,38, tdh.units,20,0,1,0))),0))"result"
from tran_data_history tdh, item_loc_soh ils
where tdh.item = ils.item
and ils.item in('100002513','100002484')
and trunc(tdh.TRAN_DATE)
between (*select first_date from (select item,min(trunc(first_received)) first_date From Item_loc_soh*
where item in('100002513','100002484') and first_received is not null
group by item ))
and trunc(sysdate)
group by ils.item
Problem with this query is, the block mentioned in BOLD is returning two rows, and I am writing between and clause .. since the query in bold is returning more than one row, it is throwing error stating that single query returns more than one row .. Requirement is, whatever date which is returned with value 100002513 should be compared with sysdate, and other value 100002484 should be compared with sysdate .. Irrespective of number of items (whether 1 or more than 1) should simultaneously be compared with sysdate
How to change my query
Regards

Inner query
Select First_Date From (Select Item, Min(Trunc(First_Received)) First_Date
                                    From Item_Loc_Soh *
                                    Where Item In ('100002513', '100002484')
                                    And First_Received Is Not Null
                                    Group By Item)
this will return 2 rows for each of the item id 2513 and 2484 because you write query for this 2 rows
and select min date
which means
item id 2513 min date
item id 2482 min date
if you want to compare just a date to sysdate then do it directly,
Select Ils.Item,
       (Nvl(Sum(Decode(Tdh.Loc_Type,
                       'S',
                       Decode(Tdh.Tran_Code, 1, Tdh.Units, 0),
                       'W',
                       Decode(Tdh.Tran_Code,
                              30,
                              0,
                              31,
                              0,
                              32,
                              Tdh.Units,
                              33,
                              Tdh.Units,
                              37,
                              0,
                              38,
                              Tdh.Units,
                              20,
                              0,
                              1,
                              0))),
            0)) "result"
From Tran_Data_History Tdh, Item_Loc_Soh Ils
Where Tdh.Item = Ils.Item
   And Ils.Item In ('100002513', '100002484')
   And Trunc(First_Received) = Sysdate;
however i dont understand importance of Tdh.Tran_Date and which date you exactly want to compare
hope this helps,
if not plz clarify more on the questionsEdited by: Nicloei W on Sep 24, 2008 11:51 PM

Problem in Changing the Query of LOV using Forms Personalisation

Hi all,
I have a problem while trying to change the LOV of job field in the people--> assignment form. I am trying to do through forms personalisation. I defined all the rquired fields:
Following are the description of fields Idescribed in the form Personalisation:
Trigger Event: WHEN-NEW-FORM-INSTANCE
in actions tab:
10-- Built In--Create Record Group With Query
11-Property----LOV
Target Object--JOBS
Property Name--GROUP_NAME
vALUE--jobs(rECORD gROUP NAME created above)
It is validated successfully,
but when trying to open the form it is giving an error 'cannot create record group jobs'..
Can anybody help me with this..
Thanks and Regards
Raj

I found that there is no problem with code. My problem is not technical, its a functional problem.
It is related to Inventory's "System Items" KFF.
Can anybody tell me, to this "System Items" KFF, one value set is assigned. but it is of none type of value set. so from where the values in LOV are coming?

Bica: change the query cause error in the pas model

Dear friends,
We have very simple scenario: one query 'SSM_SQL_KPI_MAY'' for feeding the pas model- 2 demensions and 2 measures. With this query I load the schema and data to the pas model.Everithing was fine. After that we added new dimension to the query.Ichanged the existing query and load the data with bica.But when I try to open the model I get the next error every time
DAT316:
No internal Dimenson unique name to position cache exists for 'EZOR_KEY' on Linkid 'BI' Cube 'SSMKPI/SSM_SQL_KPI_MAY'
We try to resolve the issue by deleting data and schema but every time I get the same error.
How is it possible to resolve this issue?
What is a best practice in the case of changing queries working with bica?
Thanks.
Best regards,Orit.

Dear Orit,
Keep in mind that dimensions provided by a BICA query connection must have a HIERARCHY associated to the base characteristic in BW. PAS uses this hierarchy to define the "Result" (rollup) levels of the dimension. Check your BW query and verifiy that all the included dimensions have associated hierarchies in use. I'm guessing this is the issue with your new dimension.
You can also check the dimensions in PAS by selecting your model, then "Dimensions" and right-clicking on the affected dimension name and then the "View" option (or "List" or something related to displaying the dimension definition). You should see a PAS script that describes the dimension, including the dimension member IDs, descriptions and rollup levels. This should be consistent with your query results and hierarchies).
Also, from the same menú you may also choose to "Delete" a dimension.
Good luck!
Regards

Changing the Query Names

Hello,
I have created a query on an info provider and now I want to change the description as well as the technical name of this query. Is there a way to achievce this? I know I can copy the query rename there. But is there any other way to do this task?
Thanks in advance...

Hi,
you can use the save as function to store the query under a new technical name. The text/description can be changed at any time but not the technical name. The only solution for that is what I mentioned at the beginning. After doing that, delete the 'old' query.
regards
Siggi

Changing the Query in Production

HI
My requirement is to make a small change in a query which is available in production with out changing in Quality .When i am trying to change i got the error message like Error :System is not set to changeable - Objects are not changeable.How to change a single report with out accessing tcode se06 and scc4 .Please advise.
Regarsd
Arun

Hi there,
No it isn't with a not changeable system. The only option is the one I've mentioned, which is make the query elements changeable even if you have a not changeable system, but this will be for all the queries and not a single one.
Diogo.

Programmatically change the query used to generate Oracle Reports

I have two queries. Depending on some parameter value, I would like to use one of these queries to generate my report. Is it possible to programmatically change the SQL query used to generate the Oracle Report.
Thanks

There are two options:
- The easy way
In the report paper layout create two frames, one for each query , and at runtime
display only one based on your parameters. (using format triggers on the frames)
- the not so easy way (but more elegant)
create the query at runtime using xml customizations using the examples from
the following documentation:
http://download-
uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14099_17/bi.1012/b14048/pbr_xml.htm#i1006734
16.3 Creating XML Data Models
16.4.1.3 Applying an XML Report Definition in PL/SQL
16.4.1.3.2 Applying an XML Definition Stored in Memory
Regards and Good Luck
Ionut S

JPA/Toplink changes the query logic

Hi,
Iam currently using JPA with Toplink implementation , i guess that toplink has its own way of optimizing the provided JPA query ; on another words , toplink sometimes changes the way you are using joins and exists statement to what looks optimized , but unfor. this caused me troubles tracking a query that should work on a certain way but its not cause the generated query by Toplink ( can be captured on the log ) does not represent the same logic , is this a known issue or do i have to write my JPA query on a way on which can be translated correctly by toplink , i know i should provide the query it self , but the model structure is too complex.
Thanks in advance

Hello,
JPQL does not directly translate to SQL, so there might be some differences in what you may be expecting due to JPA requirements on the results that are returned. If there is a problem with specific queries, please let us know and file a bug if it is not behaving the way it should. A workaround would be to use a native SQL query directly.
Best Regards,
Chris

How do I change the query based on parameter value

hi,
Based on parameter value I want to change my query. If paramter value is 'O' i want the 'order by depno' in query if the value is null i don't want the order by clause.
How do I achieve this.
Thanks
Ram

U can use lexical parameter
i.e u create one user parameter and in query
u use this parameter with &param_name
ex.
select val,prize from stock where sr_no > :srno
orderby &ord_by
here ord_by is lexical parameter
and set its intial value to 'sr_no'
so u can get result order by sr_no
this parameter is set from form so u will give condition in form and depending
on condition u will pass this parameter from form.

Reg :Changing the query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for